2 x AMD EPYC 7742 vs. 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Add another performance-per-dollar value in the table above to see customized performance-per-dollar graphs.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 338 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core had the most wins, coming in first place for 58% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core) was 1.133x the speed of the slowest (2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280).

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: OpenSSL (Algorithm: SHA256) at 7.87x, PostgreSQL pgbench (Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency) at 4.476x, PostgreSQL pgbench (Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write) at 4.465x, Tungsten Renderer (Scene: Volumetric Caustic) at 3.548x, Stress-NG (Test: Vector Math) at 3.097x, Himeno Benchmark (Poisson Pressure Solver) at 2.716x, Stress-NG (Test: Crypto) at 2.58x, Stress-NG (Test: CPU Stress) at 2.542x, m-queens (Time To Solve) at 2.435x, Kvazaar (Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast) at 2.382x.

338 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread