WebP Image Encode

This is a test of Google's libwebp with the cwebp image encode utility and using a sample 6000x4000 pixel JPEG image as the input.

To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark webp.

Test Created

22 September 2020

Test Maintainer

Michael Larabel 

Test Type

Processor

Average Install Time

27 Seconds

Average Run Time

1 Minute, 27 Seconds

Test Dependencies

C/C++ Compiler Toolchain + JPEG Library

Supported Platforms


Public Result Uploads *Reported Installs **Reported Test Completions **Test Profile Page Views ***OpenBenchmarking.orgEventsWebP Image Encode Popularity Statisticspts/webp2020.092020.102020.112020.122021.012021.022021.032021.042021.052021.067001400210028003500
* Uploading of benchmark result data to OpenBenchmarking.org is always optional (opt-in) via the Phoronix Test Suite for users wishing to share their results publicly.
** Data based on those opting to upload their test results to OpenBenchmarking.org and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform.
*** Test profile page view reporting began March 2021.
Data current as of 15 June 2021.
Default17.5%Quality 100, Lossless21.9%Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression20.8%Quality 100, Highest Compression21.3%Quality 10018.5%Encode Settings Option PopularityOpenBenchmarking.org

Revision History

pts/webp-1.0.0   [View Source]   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 15:36:31 GMT
Initial libwebp cwebp benchmark.

Suites Using This Test

Imaging

Creator Workloads


Performance Metrics

Analyze Test Configuration:

WebP Image Encode 1.1

Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless

OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 877 public results since 22 September 2020 with the latest data as of 2 June 2021.

Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.

Component
Percentile Rank
# Compatible Public Results
Encode Time - Seconds (Average)
95th
10
12.9 +/- 0.1
92nd
34
13.1 +/- 0.4
92nd
54
13.1 +/- 0.4
90th
14
13.3 +/- 0.1
86th
17
14.2 +/- 1.1
86th
6
14.2 +/- 1.0
84th
24
14.8 +/- 0.2
82nd
12
14.9 +/- 0.3
81st
3
15.1 +/- 0.6
80th
10
15.1 +/- 0.3
80th
5
15.1 +/- 0.4
77th
10
15.3 +/- 0.1
77th
7
15.4 +/- 0.1
76th
4
15.4 +/- 0.1
Mid-Tier
75th
> 15.5
73rd
3
15.7 +/- 0.1
72nd
7
15.8 +/- 0.4
71st
3
15.8 +/- 0.1
71st
10
15.9 +/- 0.2
71st
3
16.0 +/- 0.1
69th
5
16.1 +/- 0.1
67th
7
16.4 +/- 0.4
66th
12
16.8 +/- 0.5
64th
3
17.0 +/- 0.3
63rd
9
17.2 +/- 0.3
63rd
3
17.2
63rd
4
17.4 +/- 1.0
61st
3
17.5 +/- 0.2
60th
10
17.8 +/- 0.2
60th
3
17.8 +/- 0.1
60th
10
17.9 +/- 0.3
58th
3
18.1 +/- 0.1
56th
6
18.3 +/- 0.3
55th
20
18.6 +/- 1.0
54th
3
18.7 +/- 0.1
54th
3
18.7 +/- 0.1
54th
8
18.8 +/- 0.3
53rd
14
18.8 +/- 0.3
53rd
3
18.9 +/- 0.1
52nd
7
18.9 +/- 0.3
51st
5
19.0 +/- 0.2
Median
50th
19.0
49th
3
19.0 +/- 0.1
47th
5
19.3 +/- 0.2
46th
3
19.3 +/- 0.1
44th
3
19.6 +/- 0.3
43rd
3
19.8 +/- 0.1
43rd
6
19.8 +/- 0.2
42nd
3
20.1 +/- 0.2
39th
4
20.3 +/- 0.1
39th
6
20.3 +/- 0.4
38th
5
20.5 +/- 0.2
35th
6
20.8 +/- 0.1
35th
6
20.8 +/- 0.3
35th
6
20.8 +/- 0.2
32nd
8
20.9 +/- 0.2
32nd
3
21.0 +/- 0.1
32nd
6
21.0 +/- 0.1
31st
6
21.0 +/- 0.1
30th
6
21.0 +/- 0.1
29th
6
21.1 +/- 0.1
29th
5
21.1 +/- 0.1
28th
6
21.2 +/- 0.1
26th
7
21.4 +/- 0.2
26th
3
21.4 +/- 0.2
26th
3
21.5 +/- 0.1
Low-Tier
25th
> 21.5
25th
5
21.6 +/- 2.9
24th
6
21.7 +/- 0.1
24th
3
21.7 +/- 0.1
23rd
16
21.7 +/- 0.2
23rd
4
21.7 +/- 0.3
23rd
3
21.8 +/- 0.2
17th
3
22.6 +/- 0.1
17th
3
22.7 +/- 0.1
17th
3
22.8 +/- 0.1
17th
10
22.9 +/- 0.7
16th
10
23.2 +/- 0.9
13th
6
23.7 +/- 0.2
12th
7
24.3 +/- 0.7
11th
3
24.5 +/- 0.1
9th
3
25.1 +/- 0.1
9th
3
25.1 +/- 0.1
8th
3
25.8 +/- 0.2
8th
3
25.8 +/- 2.5
5th
4
30.3 +/- 0.4
5th
3
32.2 +/- 0.1
4th
3
33.6 +/- 0.1
4th
4
35.6 +/- 0.1
3rd
6
37.6 +/- 0.2
2nd
7
88.0 +/- 5.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgDistribution Of Public Results - Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless877 Results Range From 12 To 615 Encode Time - Seconds123762871121371621872122372622873123373623874124374624875125375625876126372004006008001000

Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (WebP Image Encode 1.1 - Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless) has an average run-time of 2 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 3 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMinutesTime Required To Complete BenchmarkEncode Settings: Quality 100, LosslessRun-Time3691215Min: 1 / Avg: 1.18 / Max: 8

Based on public OpenBenchmarking.org results, the selected test / test configuration has an average standard deviation of 0.3%.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterAverage Deviation Between RunsEncode Settings: Quality 100, LosslessDeviation246810Min: 0 / Avg: 0.34 / Max: 2

Does It Scale Well With Increasing Cores?

No, based on the automated analysis of the collected public benchmark data, this test / test settings does not generally scale well with increasing CPU core counts. Data based on publicly available results for this test / test settings, separated by vendor, result divided by the reference CPU clock speed, grouped by matching physical CPU core count, and normalized against the smallest core count tested from each vendor for each CPU having a sufficient number of test samples and statistically significant data.

AMDIntelOpenBenchmarking.orgRelative Core Scaling To BaseWebP Image Encode CPU Core ScalingEncode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless4681216243248640.69581.39162.08742.78323.479

Recent Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.org Results Compare

1 System - 24 Benchmark Results

1 System - 372 Benchmark Results

2 x AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core - AMD DAYTONA_X - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.13.0-051300rc4-generic - X Server 1.20.11

12 Systems - 214 Benchmark Results

2 x AMD EPYC 7343 16-Core - AMD DAYTONA_X - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.13.0-051300rc4-generic - X Server 1.20.11

1 System - 369 Benchmark Results

2 x AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core - AMD DAYTONA_X - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.13.0-051300rc4-generic - X Server 1.20.11

4 Systems - 214 Benchmark Results

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 - Intel M50CYP2SB2U - Intel Device 0998

Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.13.0-051300rc4-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.4

3 Systems - 214 Benchmark Results

Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 - Intel M50CYP2SB2U - Intel Device 0998

Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.13.0-051300rc4-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.4

1 System - 485 Benchmark Results

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 - Intel M50CYP2SB2U - Intel Device 0998

Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.13.0-051300rc4-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.4

5 Systems - 148 Benchmark Results

ARMv8 Cortex-A72 - BCM2835 Raspberry Pi 4 Model B Rev 1.1 - 2048MB

Debian 10 - 5.4.51-v8+ - LXDE 0.10.0

1 System - 206 Benchmark Results

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 - Intel M50CYP2SB2U - Intel Device 0998

Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.13.0-051300rc4-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.4

11 Systems - 454 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.12.0-051200rc3daily20210315-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.3

1 System - 21 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-3615QM - Apple MacBook Pro - Intel 7

macOS 10.15.7 - 19.6.0 - Clang 12.0.0 + GCC 12.0.0

Most Popular Test Results

Find More Test Results