Tungsten Renderer

Tungsten is a C++ physically based renderer that makes use of Intel's Embree ray tracing library.

To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark tungsten.

Project Site

benedikt-bitterli.me

Test Created

12 August 2019

Test Maintainer

Michael Larabel 

Test Type

Processor

Average Install Time

1 Minute, 21 Seconds

Average Run Time

1 Minute, 15 Seconds

Test Dependencies

C/C++ Compiler Toolchain + CMake

Accolades

5k+ Downloads

Supported Platforms

Public Result Uploads *Reported Installs **Reported Test Completions **Test Profile Page Views ***OpenBenchmarking.orgEventsTungsten Renderer Popularity Statisticspts/tungsten2019.082019.092019.102019.112019.122020.012020.022020.032020.042020.052020.062020.072020.082020.092020.102020.112020.122021.012021.022021.032021.042021.052021.064K8K12K16K20K
* Uploading of benchmark result data to OpenBenchmarking.org is always optional (opt-in) via the Phoronix Test Suite for users wishing to share their results publicly.
** Data based on those opting to upload their test results to OpenBenchmarking.org and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform.
*** Test profile page view reporting began March 2021.
Data current as of 20 June 2021.
Non-Exponential21.6%Hair31.0%Water Caustic27.1%Volumetric Caustic20.3%Scene Option PopularityOpenBenchmarking.org

Revision History

pts/tungsten-1.0.0   [View Source]   Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:26:48 GMT
Initial commit of Tungsten renderer benchmark.

Suites Using This Test

C/C++ Compiler Tests

Multi-Core

Intel oneAPI

Creator Workloads

Renderers


Performance Metrics

Analyze Test Configuration:

Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2

Scene: Hair

OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 1,211 public results since 12 August 2019 with the latest data as of 8 June 2021.

Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.

Component
Percentile Rank
# Compatible Public Results
Seconds (Average)
2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core
98th
50
6
2 x AMD EPYC 7642 48-Core
95th
14
6
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core
93rd
25
6
2 x AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core
93rd
4
6
2 x AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core
92nd
4
6
2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380
92nd
11
6 +/- 1
2 x AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core
91st
8
7
2 x AMD EPYC 7532 32-Core
90th
8
7
2 x AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core
90th
12
7
AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core
89th
15
7
2 x AMD EPYC 7452 32-Core
86th
4
7
AMD EPYC 7702 64-Core
85th
13
7
AMD EPYC 7662 64-Core
85th
10
7
2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6258R
85th
5
7
2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
84th
26
8
2 x AMD EPYC 7402 24-Core
83rd
8
8
2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core
80th
8
8
2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core
79th
6
8
AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core
78th
9
8
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core
78th
20
8 +/- 1
AMD EPYC 7642 48-Core
77th
34
8
2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8272CL
77th
4
9
Mid-Tier
75th
> 9
2 x AMD EPYC 7352 24-Core
75th
7
9
2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6230R
74th
3
9
2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8259L
73rd
5
9
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380
73rd
6
9
AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core
72nd
7
9
2 x AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core
72nd
8
10
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core
71st
13
10 +/- 1
AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core
68th
9
10
AMD EPYC 7502P 32-Core
68th
14
10
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core
68th
6
10
2 x AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core
68th
5
10
AMD EPYC 7532 32-Core
67th
9
10
2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6226R
67th
3
10
AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core
66th
9
11
2 x Intel Xeon Gold 5220R
65th
12
11
2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6138
64th
9
11
AMD EPYC 7402P 24-Core
63rd
12
12
AMD EPYC 7402 24-Core
62nd
7
12
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
61st
10
12
2 x AMD EPYC 7272 12-Core
60th
4
12
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24-Core
60th
4
13
AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core
59th
6
13
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core
57th
10
13
AMD EPYC 7352 24-Core
57th
6
13
2 x Intel Xeon Silver 4216
57th
4
13
AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core
57th
3
13
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core
56th
27
14
AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core
56th
11
14 +/- 1
2 x AMD EPYC 7F32 8-Core
53rd
5
14
Intel Core i9-10980XE
53rd
17
14 +/- 1
2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6250
53rd
5
14
Intel Xeon Gold 6230R
52nd
3
15 +/- 1
2 x Intel Xeon Silver 4214R
51st
4
15
Median
50th
15
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core
50th
12
16
2 x AMD EPYC 7262 8-Core
49th
5
16
AMD EPYC 7302P 16-Core
49th
14
16 +/- 1
AMD EPYC 7401P 24-Core
48th
3
16
AMD EPYC 7302 16-Core
47th
9
16
2 x AMD EPYC 7252 8-Core
45th
5
17
Intel Core i9-7960X
45th
5
17
AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core
45th
10
17 +/- 1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core
45th
6
17 +/- 1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core
43rd
42
18
2 x Intel Xeon Silver 4215R
43rd
4
18
2 x Intel Xeon Silver 4210R
42nd
3
18
Intel Xeon Gold 6226R
40th
9
18
Intel Xeon Gold 5220R
39th
4
18 +/- 1
2 x Intel Xeon Silver 4210
39th
4
19
Intel Xeon Gold 6138
39th
5
19
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 12-Core
37th
3
20
Intel Core i9-10900K
37th
18
20
AMD EPYC 7272 12-Core
36th
7
21 +/- 1
Intel Xeon Gold 5218
35th
15
22
Intel Xeon W-2295
34th
3
22
Intel Xeon Silver 4216
33rd
13
23 +/- 1
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-Core
31st
6
24
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
31st
6
25 +/- 1
Intel Xeon Platinum 8253
31st
6
25 +/- 1
AMD EPYC 7F32 8-Core
29th
11
26 +/- 1
Intel Xeon Silver 4214R
29th
5
26
Intel Xeon Gold 6250
28th
3
27 +/- 1
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core
27th
4
27
Intel Core i9-9900KS
27th
8
28 +/- 2
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Eight-Core
27th
5
28 +/- 2
Intel Core i9-9900K
27th
10
28 +/- 1
Low-Tier
25th
> 29
AMD EPYC 7262 8-Core
25th
6
30 +/- 1
AMD EPYC 7252 8-Core
24th
4
31 +/- 1
AMD EPYC 7232P 8-Core
24th
14
32 +/- 1
Intel Xeon Silver 4215R
22nd
5
33
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
22nd
4
33 +/- 1
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core
22nd
4
33 +/- 1
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6-Core
21st
10
34 +/- 1
Intel Xeon Gold 5217
20th
10
35 +/- 1
Intel Core i5-10600K
19th
13
36
Intel Core i7-5960X
18th
13
38 +/- 3
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3
17th
4
39 +/- 1
AMD EPYC 7251 8-Core
16th
5
40
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core
16th
5
41 +/- 1
Intel Core i5-9400F
14th
4
54 +/- 1
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
14th
4
55 +/- 1
Intel Core i7-9750H
14th
4
55 +/- 2
Intel Core i7 990X
13th
9
59 +/- 1
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v6
12th
6
60 +/- 1
Intel Core i7-4790K
11th
4
65 +/- 8
Intel Core i7-1165G7
10th
6
71 +/- 11
Intel Core i5-7600K
9th
5
82 +/- 1
Intel Core i5-2500K
5th
4
103 +/- 12
Intel Core i7-8550U
5th
6
106 +/- 8
Intel Core i5-8265U
5th
3
109 +/- 1
Intel Core i7-5600U
3rd
3
177 +/- 4
AMD A10-7850K APU
2nd
3
182 +/- 2
Intel Core i5-2520M
2nd
3
190
OpenBenchmarking.orgDistribution Of Public Results - Scene: Hair1211 Results Range From 5 To 24761 Seconds550199714931989248529813477397344694965546159576453694974457941843789339429992510421109171141311909124051290113397138931438914885153811587716373168691736517861183571885319349198452034120837213332182922325228212331723813243092480530060090012001500

Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - Scene: Hair) has an average run-time of 2 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 3 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMinutesTime Required To Complete BenchmarkScene: HairRun-Time1020304050Min: 1 / Avg: 1.8 / Max: 49

Based on public OpenBenchmarking.org results, the selected test / test configuration has an average standard deviation of 0.2%.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterAverage Deviation Between RunsScene: HairDeviation246810Min: 0 / Avg: 0.16 / Max: 2

Does It Scale Well With Increasing Cores?

Yes, based on the automated analysis of the collected public benchmark data, this test / test settings does generally scale well with increasing CPU core counts. Data based on publicly available results for this test / test settings, separated by vendor, result divided by the reference CPU clock speed, grouped by matching physical CPU core count, and normalized against the smallest core count tested from each vendor for each CPU having a sufficient number of test samples and statistically significant data.

IntelAMDOpenBenchmarking.orgRelative Core Scaling To BaseTungsten Renderer CPU Core ScalingScene: Hair46812161820243248642.344.687.029.3611.7

Recent Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.org Results Compare

12 Systems - 214 Benchmark Results

2 x AMD EPYC 7443 24-Core - AMD DAYTONA_X - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.13.0-051300rc4-generic - X Server 1.20.11

1 System - 240 Benchmark Results

2 x Intel Xeon - OpenStack Foundation Nova v21.0.0 - Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-74-generic - GCC 9.3.0

1 System - 241 Benchmark Results

2 x Intel Xeon - OpenStack Foundation Nova v21.0.0 - Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-74-generic - GCC 9.3.0

1 System - 56 Benchmark Results

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 - Supermicro X10DRG-O+-CPU v1.00 - Intel Xeon E7 v4

Ubuntu 16.04 - 4.15.0-142-generic - X Server 1.19.6

4 Systems - 214 Benchmark Results

Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 - Intel M50CYP2SB2U - Intel Device 0998

Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.13.0-051300rc4-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.4

3 Systems - 214 Benchmark Results

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 - Intel M50CYP2SB2U - Intel Device 0998

Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.13.0-051300rc4-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.4

1 System - 485 Benchmark Results

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 - Intel M50CYP2SB2U - Intel Device 0998

Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.13.0-051300rc4-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.4

1 System - 206 Benchmark Results

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 - Intel M50CYP2SB2U - Intel Device 0998

Ubuntu 21.04 - 5.13.0-051300rc4-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.4

2 Systems - 58 Benchmark Results

2 x Intel Xeon Silver 4214 - GIGABYTE MR91-FS0-A1 v01000100 - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers

Ubuntu 16.04 - 4.4.0-131-generic - GCC 5.4.0 20160609

1 System - 57 Benchmark Results

AMD EPYC 7402P 24-Core - GIGABYTE MZ22-G20-00 v01000100 - AMD Device 1480

Ubuntu 16.04 - 4.15.0-142-generic - Unity 7.4.5

1 System - 58 Benchmark Results

AMD EPYC 7402P 24-Core - GIGABYTE MZ22-G20-00 v01000100 - AMD Device 1480

Ubuntu 16.04 - 4.15.0-142-generic - Unity 7.4.5

13 Systems - 119 Benchmark Results

Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C - Supermicro X12DPi-N6 v1.00 - Intel Device 0998

Ubuntu 19.10 - 5.3.0-64-generic - GNOME Shell 3.34.1

Most Popular Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.org Results Compare

3 Systems - 268 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i5-2520M - HP 161C - Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM

Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.18.0-20-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.3

16 Systems - 119 Benchmark Results

Intel Xeon Platinum 8259L - ASRockRack EP2C621D16-4LP - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers

Ubuntu 19.10 - 5.3.0-64-generic - GNOME Shell 3.34.1

11 Systems - 217 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-Core - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.9.0-050900-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

12 Systems - 593 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.8.0-050800daily20200622-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.2

8 Systems - 360 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i9-10980XE - Gigabyte X299X DESIGNARE 10G - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers

Ubuntu 19.10 - 5.4.0-999-generic - GNOME Shell 3.34.1

3 Systems - 301 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i5-4670 - MSI B85M-P33 - Intel 4th Gen Core DRAM

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-40-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.3

3 Systems - 173 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core - ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-37-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.2

12 Systems - 229 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.9.0-050900-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

12 Systems - 27 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-6700HQ - Apple Mac-A5C67F76ED83108C - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-33-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.2

18 Systems - 115 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 16-Core - MSI MEG X399 CREATION - AMD 17h

Ubuntu 19.10 - 5.3.0-19-generic - GNOME Shell 3.34.1
Find More Test Results