Add Processor To Compare:

 
Intel Core i9-10900K  
Core Count
10
Thread Count
20
CPU Clock *
5.3 GHz
Core Family
Comet Lake
First Appeared
2020
Overall Percentile
60th
Total OpenBenchmarking.org Results
25,433
Qualified Test Combinations
667
Performance Per Dollar
Affiliate Shopping Links *
Amazon
More Details On OpenBenchmarking.org
Remove From Comparison
* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.


Of the components selected for comparison, there were 667 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

667 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread

OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 16.02Compress Speed TestIntel Core i9-10900K14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 785.24, N = 4364201
OpenBenchmarking.orgGFLOP/s, More Is BetterACES DGEMM 1.0Sustained Floating-Point RateIntel Core i9-10900K1.17472.34943.52414.69885.8735SE +/- 0.051, N = 125.220
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterAI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2Device Inference ScoreIntel Core i9-10900K30060090012001500SE +/- 17.41, N = 101420
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterAI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2Device Training ScoreIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 16.08, N = 101133
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterAI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2Device AI ScoreIntel Core i9-10900K5001000150020002500SE +/- 33.44, N = 102553
OpenBenchmarking.orgk/s, More Is BetterAircrack-ng 1.7Intel Core i9-10900K10K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 6.29, N = 346755
OpenBenchmarking.orgFigure Of Merit, More Is BetterAlgebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2Intel Core i9-10900K50M100M150M200M250MSE +/- 4492212.93, N = 9216473059
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache Benchmark 2.4.29Static Web Page ServingIntel Core i9-10900K8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 1219.15, N = 2137473
OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterApache Cassandra 4.0Test: WritesIntel Core i9-10900K30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 108.59, N = 3127007
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaScene: EmilyIntel Core i9-10900K70140210280350SE +/- 0.56, N = 19302
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaScene: Disney MaterialIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 0.31, N = 21177
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaScene: Material TesterIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 0.50, N = 23167
OpenBenchmarking.orgMillion Grid Points Per Second, More Is BetterASKAP 1.0Test: tConvolve MT - GriddingIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 0.93, N = 71032
OpenBenchmarking.orgMillion Grid Points Per Second, More Is BetterASKAP 1.0Test: tConvolve MT - DegriddingIntel Core i9-10900K400800120016002000SE +/- 3.11, N = 71765
OpenBenchmarking.orgMpix/sec, More Is BetterASKAP 1.0Test: tConvolve MPI - DegriddingIntel Core i9-10900K5001000150020002500SE +/- 8.98, N = 32509
OpenBenchmarking.orgMpix/sec, More Is BetterASKAP 1.0Test: tConvolve MPI - GriddingIntel Core i9-10900K5001000150020002500SE +/- 12.32, N = 32173
OpenBenchmarking.orgMillion Grid Points Per Second, More Is BetterASKAP 1.0Test: tConvolve OpenMP - GriddingIntel Core i9-10900K30060090012001500SE +/- 38.56, N = 71310
OpenBenchmarking.orgMillion Grid Points Per Second, More Is BetterASKAP 1.0Test: tConvolve OpenMP - DegriddingIntel Core i9-10900K5001000150020002500SE +/- 59.54, N = 72323
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Second, More Is BetterASKAP 1.0Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMPIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 0.74, N = 7187
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes/second, More Is BetterasmFish 2018-07-231024 Hash Memory, 26 DepthIntel Core i9-10900K8M16M24M32M40MSE +/- 198052.47, N = 2939554747
OpenBenchmarking.orgMT/s, More Is BetterASTC Encoder 4.0Preset: FastIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 0.20, N = 3189
OpenBenchmarking.orgMT/s, More Is BetterASTC Encoder 4.0Preset: ThoroughIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.006, N = 38.880
OpenBenchmarking.orgMT/s, More Is BetterASTC Encoder 4.0Preset: ExhaustiveIntel Core i9-10900K0.2040.4080.6120.8161.02SE +/- 0.0003, N = 30.9100
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBasis Universal 1.12Settings: ETC1SIntel Core i9-10900K1020304050SE +/- 0.39, N = 2843.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBasis Universal 1.12Settings: UASTC Level 3Intel Core i9-10900K1122334455SE +/- 0.09, N = 3346.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBasis Universal 1.13Settings: ETC1SIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.13, N = 1121.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBasis Universal 1.13Settings: UASTC Level 2Intel Core i9-10900K612182430SE +/- 0.08, N = 1125.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBasis Universal 1.13Settings: UASTC Level 3Intel Core i9-10900K1122334455SE +/- 0.20, N = 1146.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.82Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 0.40, N = 16115
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.82Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K70140210280350SE +/- 0.92, N = 17339
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.82Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 0.86, N = 15180
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.82Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K100200300400500SE +/- 2.10, N = 17475
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.82Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K90180270360450SE +/- 2.27, N = 14430
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.92Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 1.72, N = 10120
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.92Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K80160240320400SE +/- 0.96, N = 5365
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.92Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K100200300400500SE +/- 0.28, N = 3481
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 3.0Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 0.41, N = 3112
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 3.0Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K70140210280350SE +/- 0.65, N = 3318
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 3.0Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 0.09, N = 3156
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 3.0Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K90180270360450SE +/- 0.51, N = 3393
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 3.0Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K30060090012001500SE +/- 58.20, N = 41331
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 3.3Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.30, N = 3111
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 3.3Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K70140210280350SE +/- 1.35, N = 3324
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 3.3Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 0.23, N = 3152
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 3.3Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K30060090012001500SE +/- 3.20, N = 31260
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 3.3Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K90180270360450SE +/- 0.87, N = 3401
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterBotan 2.17.3Test: KASUMIIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 0.99, N = 4116
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterBotan 2.17.3Test: KASUMI - DecryptIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 0.92, N = 4112
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterBotan 2.17.3Test: AES-256Intel Core i9-10900K11002200330044005500SE +/- 5.74, N = 44907
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterBotan 2.17.3Test: AES-256 - DecryptIntel Core i9-10900K11002200330044005500SE +/- 6.65, N = 44904
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterBotan 2.17.3Test: TwofishIntel Core i9-10900K100200300400500SE +/- 3.59, N = 4451
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterBotan 2.17.3Test: Twofish - DecryptIntel Core i9-10900K100200300400500SE +/- 3.62, N = 4453
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterBotan 2.17.3Test: BlowfishIntel Core i9-10900K120240360480600SE +/- 0.67, N = 4556
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterBotan 2.17.3Test: Blowfish - DecryptIntel Core i9-10900K120240360480600SE +/- 0.64, N = 4552
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterBotan 2.17.3Test: CAST-256Intel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 0.10, N = 4176
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterBotan 2.17.3Test: CAST-256 - DecryptIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 0.12, N = 4176
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterBotan 2.17.3Test: ChaCha20Poly1305Intel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 8.09, N = 4933
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterBotan 2.17.3Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - DecryptIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 7.91, N = 4927
OpenBenchmarking.orgVGR Performance Metric, More Is BetterBRL-CAD 7.32.6VGR Performance MetricIntel Core i9-10900K40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 242.44, N = 3190858
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBuild2 0.12Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 1.42, N = 2288
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBuild2 0.13Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 1.28, N = 11113
OpenBenchmarking.orgLPS, More Is BetterBYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6Computational Test: Dhrystone 2Intel Core i9-10900K11M22M33M44M55MSE +/- 178076.44, N = 1251422641
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: ReadIntel Core i9-10900K9001800270036004500SE +/- 104.93, N = 54427
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: WriteIntel Core i9-10900K8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 34.50, N = 536175
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: Read / Modify / WriteIntel Core i9-10900K12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 39.78, N = 555859
OpenBenchmarking.orgKsamples, More Is BetterChaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07Mode: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 65.70, N = 1819665
OpenBenchmarking.orgvsamples, More Is BetterChaos Group V-RAY 5.02Mode: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 32.59, N = 313593
OpenBenchmarking.orgIPS, More Is BetterChia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7Test: Square Plain C++Intel Core i9-10900K30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 185.59, N = 3160867
OpenBenchmarking.orgIPS, More Is BetterChia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7Test: Square Assembly OptimizedIntel Core i9-10900K50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 2259.06, N = 3239700
OpenBenchmarking.orgSpeedup, More Is BetterCLOMP 1.2Static OMP SpeedupIntel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.20, N = 99.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterCloverLeafLagrangian-Eulerian HydrodynamicsIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 1.69, N = 8191
OpenBenchmarking.orgns, Fewer Is BetterCore-LatencyAverage Latency Between CPU CoresIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 4.47, N = 4105
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations/Sec, More Is BetterCoremark 1.0CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per SecondIntel Core i9-10900K110K220K330K440K550KSE +/- 5896.18, N = 34508871
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterCppPerformanceBenchmarks 9Test: Stepanov VectorIntel Core i9-10900K1632486480SE +/- 2.07, N = 972
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterCppPerformanceBenchmarks 9Test: Function ObjectsIntel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.32, N = 911.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterCppPerformanceBenchmarks 9Test: Stepanov AbstractionIntel Core i9-10900K714212835SE +/- 0.66, N = 928.30
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterCppPerformanceBenchmarks 9Test: Random NumbersIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 18.17, N = 9904
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterCrafty 25.2Elapsed TimeIntel Core i9-10900K2M4M6M8M10MSE +/- 37798.62, N = 3710211193
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Second, More Is BetterCryptsetupPBKDF2-whirlpoolIntel Core i9-10900K200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 1071.31, N = 17880510
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Second, More Is BetterCryptsetupPBKDF2-sha512Intel Core i9-10900K400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 4966.17, N = 132087294
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterCryptsetupAES-XTS 256b EncryptionIntel Core i9-10900K10002000300040005000SE +/- 22.61, N = 134471
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterCryptsetupAES-XTS 256b DecryptionIntel Core i9-10900K10002000300040005000SE +/- 21.28, N = 134481
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterCryptsetupSerpent-XTS 256b EncryptionIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 14.09, N = 13932
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterCryptsetupSerpent-XTS 256b DecryptionIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 10.07, N = 13921
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterCryptsetupTwofish-XTS 256b EncryptionIntel Core i9-10900K110220330440550SE +/- 3.97, N = 13521
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterCryptsetupTwofish-XTS 256b DecryptionIntel Core i9-10900K110220330440550SE +/- 3.64, N = 13521
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterCryptsetupAES-XTS 512b EncryptionIntel Core i9-10900K8001600240032004000SE +/- 14.53, N = 133652
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterCryptsetupAES-XTS 512b DecryptionIntel Core i9-10900K8001600240032004000SE +/- 14.37, N = 133651
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterCryptsetupSerpent-XTS 512b EncryptionIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 13.81, N = 13933
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterCryptsetupSerpent-XTS 512b DecryptionIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 9.93, N = 13921
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterCryptsetupTwofish-XTS 512b EncryptionIntel Core i9-10900K110220330440550SE +/- 3.82, N = 13521
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterCryptsetupTwofish-XTS 512b DecryptionIntel Core i9-10900K110220330440550SE +/- 3.71, N = 13521
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterCython Benchmark 0.29.21Test: N-QueensIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.18, N = 719.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: JythonIntel Core i9-10900K7001400210028003500SE +/- 10.43, N = 393341
OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: TradesoapIntel Core i9-10900K6001200180024003000SE +/- 12.10, N = 362935
OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: TradebeansIntel Core i9-10900K5001000150020002500SE +/- 12.88, N = 312443
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 3.0.1Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-onlyIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.24, N = 1614.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is Betterdav1d 0.6.0Video Input: Summer Nature 4KIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 0.18, N = 5178
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is Betterdav1d 0.9.2Video Input: Chimera 1080pIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 3.63, N = 3830
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is Betterdav1d 0.9.2Video Input: Summer Nature 4KIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 0.15, N = 5196
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is Betterdav1d 0.9.2Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bitIntel Core i9-10900K110220330440550SE +/- 1.29, N = 3512
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterdcrawRAW To PPM Image ConversionIntel Core i9-10900K714212835SE +/- 0.15, N = 931.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDeepSpeech 0.6Acceleration: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.28, N = 2579
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDolfyn 0.527Computational Fluid DynamicsIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.09, N = 1516.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterDragonflydb 0.6Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1Intel Core i9-10900K800K1600K2400K3200K4000KSE +/- 3672.88, N = 33562114
OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterDragonflydb 0.6Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5Intel Core i9-10900K800K1600K2400K3200K4000KSE +/- 19609.80, N = 33892735
OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterDragonflydb 0.6Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1Intel Core i9-10900K800K1600K2400K3200K4000KSE +/- 30387.06, N = 33512191
OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is BetterDragonflydb 0.6Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5Intel Core i9-10900K800K1600K2400K3200K4000KSE +/- 13728.28, N = 33674544
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.13Binary: Pathtracer - Model: CrownIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.08, N = 514.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.13Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: CrownIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.04, N = 515.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BettereSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907Text-To-Speech SynthesisIntel Core i9-10900K612182430SE +/- 0.17, N = 1725.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000Intel Core i9-10900K12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 3070.87, N = 358253
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.88, N = 317.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000Intel Core i9-10900K12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 3363.05, N = 357835
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.95, N = 317.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000Intel Core i9-10900K12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 3521.11, N = 354653
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 1.14, N = 318.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 1.42, N = 317.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests/sec, More Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000Intel Core i9-10900K12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 4087.38, N = 357733
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 1.15, N = 318.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is Betteretcd 3.5.4Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 1.57, N = 319.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgMpx/s, More Is BetterEtcpak 1.0Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2Intel Core i9-10900K6001200180024003000SE +/- 17.89, N = 32787
OpenBenchmarking.orgMpx/s, More Is BetterEtcpak 1.0Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2Intel Core i9-10900K60120180240300SE +/- 3.25, N = 3271
OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterFacebook RocksDB 6.3.6Test: Random ReadIntel Core i9-10900K15M30M45M60M75MSE +/- 649736.54, N = 2470844842
OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterFacebook RocksDB 6.3.6Test: Sequential FillIntel Core i9-10900K300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 21586.63, N = 221451773
OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterFacebook RocksDB 6.3.6Test: Read While WritingIntel Core i9-10900K600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 54755.79, N = 242888622
OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterFacebook RocksDB 7.5.3Test: Random FillIntel Core i9-10900K200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 3396.18, N = 3929768
OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterFacebook RocksDB 7.5.3Test: Random ReadIntel Core i9-10900K13M26M39M52M65MSE +/- 129278.73, N = 359222983
OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterFacebook RocksDB 7.5.3Test: Update RandomIntel Core i9-10900K110K220K330K440K550KSE +/- 779.44, N = 3531113
OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterFacebook RocksDB 7.5.3Test: Sequential FillIntel Core i9-10900K300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 9999.87, N = 31313691
OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterFacebook RocksDB 7.5.3Test: Read While WritingIntel Core i9-10900K500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 33638.14, N = 32533907
OpenBenchmarking.orgOp/s, More Is BetterFacebook RocksDB 7.5.3Test: Read Random Write RandomIntel Core i9-10900K400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 4055.18, N = 32011218
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterFFmpeg 4.0.2H.264 HD To NTSC DVIntel Core i9-10900K1.0262.0523.0784.1045.13SE +/- 0.02, N = 154.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterFFTW 3.3.6Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096Intel Core i9-10900K15003000450060007500SE +/- 120.01, N = 217229
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterFFTW 3.3.6Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096Intel Core i9-10900K6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 263.61, N = 2227469
OpenBenchmarking.orgKpos / sec, More Is BetterFhourstones 3.1Complex Connect-4 SolvingIntel Core i9-10900K4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 76.62, N = 517500
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterFinanceBench 2016-07-25Benchmark: Repo OpenMPIntel Core i9-10900K7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 152.64, N = 1230898
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterFinanceBench 2016-07-25Benchmark: Bonds OpenMPIntel Core i9-10900K9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 170.69, N = 1243934
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterFLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2WAV To FLACIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.159, N = 367.750
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterFLAC Audio Encoding 1.4WAV To FLACIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.05, N = 314.30
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterG'MICTest: 2D Function Plotting, 1000 TimesIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.70, N = 1788
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterG'MICTest: Plotting Isosurface Of A 3D Volume, 1000 TimesIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.06, N = 2116.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterG'MICTest: 3D Elevated Function In Random Colors, 100 TimesIntel Core i9-10900K1224364860SE +/- 0.19, N = 1554.80
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGcrypt Library 1.9Intel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 0.46, N = 9175
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGEGLOperation: CropIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.057, N = 197.150
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGEGLOperation: CartoonIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.25, N = 679
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGEGLOperation: ReflectIntel Core i9-10900K612182430SE +/- 0.23, N = 1625.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGEGLOperation: AntialiasIntel Core i9-10900K714212835SE +/- 0.13, N = 1032.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGEGLOperation: Tile GlassIntel Core i9-10900K612182430SE +/- 0.15, N = 625.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGEGLOperation: Wavelet BlurIntel Core i9-10900K1224364860SE +/- 0.36, N = 652.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGEGLOperation: Color EnhanceIntel Core i9-10900K1122334455SE +/- 0.66, N = 1648.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGEGLOperation: Rotate 90 DegreesIntel Core i9-10900K714212835SE +/- 0.19, N = 2031.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.18Test: resizeIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.058, N = 326.630
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.18Test: rotateIntel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.07, N = 3410.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.18Test: auto-levelsIntel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.06, N = 2910.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.18Test: unsharp-maskIntel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.07, N = 2912.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGitTime To Complete Common Git CommandsIntel Core i9-10900K1020304050SE +/- 1.02, N = 3542.80
OpenBenchmarking.orgnanoseconds, Fewer Is Betterglibc bench 1.0Benchmark: sinIntel Core i9-10900K918273645SE +/- 0.36, N = 1037.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgnanoseconds, Fewer Is Betterglibc bench 1.0Benchmark: sqrtIntel Core i9-10900K0.34690.69381.04071.38761.7345SE +/- 0.02756, N = 101.54000
OpenBenchmarking.orgnanoseconds, Fewer Is Betterglibc bench 1.0Benchmark: sincosIntel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.05, N = 1012.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgGMPbench Score, More Is BetterGNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1Total TimeIntel Core i9-10900K14002800420056007000SE +/- 9.63, N = 36459
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGNU Octave Benchmark 5.2.0Intel Core i9-10900K1.34372.68744.03115.37486.7185SE +/- 0.046, N = 245.970
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterGNU RadioTest: Five Back to Back FIR FiltersIntel Core i9-10900K30060090012001500SE +/- 15.17, N = 81269
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterGNU RadioTest: Signal Source (Cosine)Intel Core i9-10900K7001400210028003500SE +/- 7.51, N = 63220
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterGNU RadioTest: FIR FilterIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 28.36, N = 8792
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterGNU RadioTest: IIR FilterIntel Core i9-10900K140280420560700SE +/- 2.04, N = 8664
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterGNU RadioTest: FM Deemphasis FilterIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 3.23, N = 8917
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterGNU RadioTest: Hilbert TransformIntel Core i9-10900K130260390520650SE +/- 1.03, N = 6615
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGnuPG 1.4.222GB File EncryptionIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.069, N = 58.120
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGnuPG 2.2.272.7GB Sample File EncryptionIntel Core i9-10900K1224364860SE +/- 0.18, N = 653.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: jsonIntel Core i9-10900K700K1400K2100K2800K3500KSE +/- 10324.82, N = 53084212
OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: buildIntel Core i9-10900K3000M6000M9000M12000M15000MSE +/- 87502663.33, N = 315685179662
OpenBenchmarking.orgVoices, More Is BetterGoogle SynthMark 20201109Test: VoiceMark_100Intel Core i9-10900K170340510680850SE +/- 15.53, N = 13767
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGPAW 22.1Input: Carbon NanotubeIntel Core i9-10900K70140210280350SE +/- 0.13, N = 3323
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.33Operation: RotateIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 12.71, N = 32914
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.38Operation: SwirlIntel Core i9-10900K110220330440550SE +/- 3.51, N = 3511
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.38Operation: RotateIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 47.08, N = 3883
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.38Operation: SharpenIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 0.33, N = 3171
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.38Operation: EnhancedIntel Core i9-10900K60120180240300SE +/- 1.00, N = 3268
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.38Operation: ResizingIntel Core i9-10900K30060090012001500SE +/- 13.20, N = 31212
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.38Operation: Noise-GaussianIntel Core i9-10900K70140210280350SE +/- 2.00, N = 3326
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.38Operation: HWB Color SpaceIntel Core i9-10900K30060090012001500SE +/- 32.13, N = 31203
OpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Day, More Is BetterGROMACS 2022.1Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bareIntel Core i9-10900K0.21580.43160.64740.86321.079SE +/- 0.004, N = 30.960
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGzip CompressionLinux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gzIntel Core i9-10900K714212835SE +/- 0.47, N = 1029.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 16 - Type: ProcessIntel Core i9-10900K612182430SE +/- 1.06, N = 726.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 2 - Type: ThreadIntel Core i9-10900K1.09152.1833.27454.3665.4575SE +/- 0.296, N = 54.850
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 1 - Type: ProcessIntel Core i9-10900K0.48940.97881.46821.95762.447SE +/- 0.109, N = 72.180
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 32 - Type: ProcessIntel Core i9-10900K1224364860SE +/- 1.72, N = 953.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHelsing 1.0-betaDigit Range: 14 digitIntel Core i9-10900K80160240320400SE +/- 0.52, N = 9383
OpenBenchmarking.orgQUIPs, More Is BetterHierarchical INTegration 1.0Test: FLOATIntel Core i9-10900K110M220M330M440M550MSE +/- 6348099.94, N = 14494509963
OpenBenchmarking.orgGFLOP/s, More Is BetterHigh Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1Intel Core i9-10900K0.98121.96242.94363.92484.906SE +/- 0.00327, N = 144.36000
OpenBenchmarking.orgMFLOPS, More Is BetterHimeno Benchmark 3.0Poisson Pressure SolverIntel Core i9-10900K9001800270036004500SE +/- 85.17, N = 444297
OpenBenchmarking.orgGUP/s, More Is BetterHPC Challenge 1.5.0Test / Class: G-Random AccessIntel Core i9-10900K0.01140.02280.03420.04560.057SE +/- 0.00229, N = 40.05000
OpenBenchmarking.orgusecs, Fewer Is BetterHPC Challenge 1.5.0Test / Class: Random Ring LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K0.06040.12080.18120.24160.302SE +/- 0.00044, N = 40.27000
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHuginPanorama Photo Assistant + Stitching TimeIntel Core i9-10900K918273645SE +/- 0.17, N = 2338.80
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.4Acceleration: CPU - Scene: BedroomIntel Core i9-10900K0.54021.08041.62062.16082.701SE +/- 0.005, N = 92.400
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.4Acceleration: CPU - Scene: SupercarIntel Core i9-10900K1.2652.533.7955.066.325SE +/- 0.013, N = 95.620
OpenBenchmarking.orgval/sec, More Is BetterInfluxDB 1.8.2Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000Intel Core i9-10900K400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 18626.09, N = 191740342
OpenBenchmarking.orgval/sec, More Is BetterInfluxDB 1.8.2Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000Intel Core i9-10900K400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 25969.59, N = 191827825
OpenBenchmarking.orgval/sec, More Is BetterInfluxDB 1.8.2Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000Intel Core i9-10900K400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 9621.75, N = 81852465
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterInkscapeOperation: SVG Files To PNGIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.04, N = 1619.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/s, More Is BetterJava JMHThroughputIntel Core i9-10900K5000M10000M15000M20000M25000MSE +/- 6534750.63, N = 323979710466
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: CompositeIntel Core i9-10900K7001400210028003500SE +/- 11.59, N = 103063
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-RelaxationIntel Core i9-10900K400800120016002000SE +/- 6.89, N = 102001
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte CarloIntel Core i9-10900K30060090012001500SE +/- 4.42, N = 101262
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier TransformIntel Core i9-10900K400800120016002000SE +/- 6.74, N = 101938
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix MultiplyIntel Core i9-10900K6001200180024003000SE +/- 10.10, N = 102791
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix FactorizationIntel Core i9-10900K16003200480064008000SE +/- 31.70, N = 107325
OpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1Test: BlowfishIntel Core i9-10900K5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 218.80, N = 3922570
OpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1Test: MD5Intel Core i9-10900K300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 11959.26, N = 271344380
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0Settings: UASTC 3Intel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.04, N = 710.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0Settings: Zstd Compression 19Intel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.09, N = 715.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0Settings: UASTC 3 + Zstd Compression 19Intel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.05, N = 714.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0Settings: UASTC 4 + Zstd Compression 19Intel Core i9-10900K60120180240300SE +/- 0.59, N = 7263
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterKvazaar 2.1Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very FastIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.17, N = 820.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterKvazaar 2.2Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: SlowIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.05, N = 38.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterKvazaar 2.2Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: MediumIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.05, N = 38.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgns/day, More Is BetterLAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022Model: 20k AtomsIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.006, N = 38.320
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterLeelaChessZero 0.28Backend: BLASIntel Core i9-10900K90180270360450SE +/- 2.67, N = 3429
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterLeelaChessZero 0.28Backend: EigenIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 7.86, N = 3820
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Sequential FillIntel Core i9-10900K1122334455SE +/- 0.62, N = 2749.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds Per Op, Fewer Is BetterLevelDB 1.22Benchmark: Sequential FillIntel Core i9-10900K1020304050SE +/- 0.66, N = 2745.80
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterlibavif avifenc 0.10Encoder Speed: 2Intel Core i9-10900K1632486480SE +/- 0.12, N = 370
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterlibavif avifenc 0.10Encoder Speed: 6, LosslessIntel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.04, N = 312.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is Betterlibgav1 0.16.3Video Input: Chimera 1080pIntel Core i9-10900K50100150200250SE +/- 0.54, N = 5241
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is Betterlibgav1 0.16.3Video Input: Summer Nature 4KIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.20, N = 581
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is Betterlibgav1 0.16.3Video Input: Summer Nature 1080pIntel Core i9-10900K70140210280350SE +/- 0.29, N = 5325
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is Betterlibgav1 0.16.3Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bitIntel Core i9-10900K1632486480SE +/- 0.01, N = 574.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is Betterlibgav1 0.17Video Input: Chimera 1080pIntel Core i9-10900K50100150200250SE +/- 0.34, N = 6236
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is Betterlibgav1 0.17Video Input: Summer Nature 4KIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.16, N = 681
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is Betterlibgav1 0.17Video Input: Summer Nature 1080pIntel Core i9-10900K70140210280350SE +/- 0.34, N = 6318
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is Betterlibgav1 0.17Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bitIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.54, N = 675
OpenBenchmarking.orgMegapixels/sec, More Is Betterlibjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.1.0Test: Decompression ThroughputIntel Core i9-10900K50100150200250SE +/- 3.73, N = 9244
OpenBenchmarking.orgMpix/sec, More Is BetterLibRaw 0.20Post-Processing BenchmarkIntel Core i9-10900K1020304050SE +/- 1.34, N = 2142.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterlibrsvgOperation: SVG Files To PNGIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.17, N = 1916.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterLuaJIT 2.1-gitTest: CompositeIntel Core i9-10900K400800120016002000SE +/- 5.66, N = 81876
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterLuaJIT 2.1-gitTest: Monte CarloIntel Core i9-10900K140280420560700SE +/- 4.09, N = 3637
OpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterLuaJIT 2.1-gitTest: Dense LU Matrix FactorizationIntel Core i9-10900K10002000300040005000SE +/- 36.74, N = 34499
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterLuaRadio 0.9.1Test: Five Back to Back FIR FiltersIntel Core i9-10900K30060090012001500SE +/- 9.83, N = 81335
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterLuaRadio 0.9.1Test: FM Deemphasis FilterIntel Core i9-10900K120240360480600SE +/- 2.32, N = 8555
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterLuaRadio 0.9.1Test: Hilbert TransformIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.29, N = 891
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterLuaRadio 0.9.1Test: Complex PhaseIntel Core i9-10900K160320480640800SE +/- 4.93, N = 6761
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender 2.3Scene: DLSCIntel Core i9-10900K0.49280.98561.47841.97122.464SE +/- 0.01, N = 332.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender 2.3Scene: Rainbow Colors and PrismIntel Core i9-10900K0.55581.11161.66742.22322.779SE +/- 0.01, N = 332.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender 2.6Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K0.4950.991.4851.982.475SE +/- 0.02, N = 32.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender 2.6Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K0.36450.7291.09351.4581.8225SE +/- 0.04, N = 31.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender 2.6Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K0.78751.5752.36253.153.9375SE +/- 0.01, N = 34.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender 2.6Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K0.41180.82361.23541.64722.059SE +/- 0.01, N = 31.80
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender 2.6Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.11, N = 39.80
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLZ4 Compression 1.9.3Compression Level: 1 - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 11.48, N = 128635
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLZ4 Compression 1.9.3Compression Level: 1 - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 36.59, N = 1010487
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLZ4 Compression 1.9.3Compression Level: 3 - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K1428425670SE +/- 0.28, N = 1261.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLZ4 Compression 1.9.3Compression Level: 3 - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 15.53, N = 1210298
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLZ4 Compression 1.9.3Compression Level: 9 - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K1326395265SE +/- 0.27, N = 1259.80
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterLZ4 Compression 1.9.3Compression Level: 9 - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 16.63, N = 1210305
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is Betterlzbench 1.8Test: XZ 0 - Process: CompressionIntel Core i9-10900K1122334455SE +/- 0.89, N = 950
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is Betterlzbench 1.8Test: XZ 0 - Process: DecompressionIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 2.53, N = 9136
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is Betterlzbench 1.8Test: Zstd 1 - Process: CompressionIntel Core i9-10900K130260390520650SE +/- 12.02, N = 9611
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is Betterlzbench 1.8Test: Zstd 1 - Process: DecompressionIntel Core i9-10900K400800120016002000SE +/- 77.13, N = 91869
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is Betterlzbench 1.8Test: Zstd 8 - Process: CompressionIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 1.91, N = 9105
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is Betterlzbench 1.8Test: Zstd 8 - Process: DecompressionIntel Core i9-10900K400800120016002000SE +/- 85.72, N = 91999
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is Betterlzbench 1.8Test: Crush 0 - Process: CompressionIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 1.89, N = 9131
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is Betterlzbench 1.8Test: Crush 0 - Process: DecompressionIntel Core i9-10900K130260390520650SE +/- 12.00, N = 9607
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is Betterlzbench 1.8Test: Brotli 0 - Process: CompressionIntel Core i9-10900K120240360480600SE +/- 10.73, N = 9545
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is Betterlzbench 1.8Test: Brotli 0 - Process: DecompressionIntel Core i9-10900K170340510680850SE +/- 13.01, N = 9770
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is Betterlzbench 1.8Test: Brotli 2 - Process: CompressionIntel Core i9-10900K50100150200250SE +/- 3.70, N = 9229
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is Betterlzbench 1.8Test: Brotli 2 - Process: DecompressionIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 15.19, N = 9892
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is Betterlzbench 1.8Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: CompressionIntel Core i9-10900K60120180240300SE +/- 5.50, N = 9289
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is Betterlzbench 1.8Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: DecompressionIntel Core i9-10900K30060090012001500SE +/- 36.24, N = 61443
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterm-queens 1.2Time To SolveIntel Core i9-10900K1326395265SE +/- 0.07, N = 1659.80
OpenBenchmarking.orgOps/sec, More Is Bettermemtier_benchmark 1.4Protocol: Redis - Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10Intel Core i9-10900K500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 29973.12, N = 32382299
OpenBenchmarking.orgCG Mflops, More Is BetterminiFE 2.2Problem Size: SmallIntel Core i9-10900K9001800270036004500SE +/- 18.40, N = 64258
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMinion 1.8Benchmark: GracefulIntel Core i9-10900K1020304050SE +/- 0.24, N = 1743.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMinion 1.8Benchmark: SolitaireIntel Core i9-10900K1326395265SE +/- 0.84, N = 1756.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMinion 1.8Benchmark: QuasigroupIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.71, N = 1795
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMlpack BenchmarkBenchmark: scikit_svmIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.07, N = 1820.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMlpack BenchmarkBenchmark: scikit_icaIntel Core i9-10900K1122334455SE +/- 1.80, N = 1449.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMlpack BenchmarkBenchmark: scikit_linearridgeregressionIntel Core i9-10900K0.90681.81362.72043.62724.534SE +/- 0.00, N = 134.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMlpack BenchmarkBenchmark: scikit_qdaIntel Core i9-10900K1428425670SE +/- 0.16, N = 1563
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterMobile Neural Network 2.1Model: nasnetIntel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.275, N = 39.170
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterMobile Neural Network 2.1Model: mobilenetV3Intel Core i9-10900K0.3310.6620.9931.3241.655SE +/- 0.085, N = 31.470
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterMobile Neural Network 2.1Model: squeezenetv1.1Intel Core i9-10900K0.61881.23761.85642.47523.094SE +/- 0.01, N = 32.80
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterMobile Neural Network 2.1Model: resnet-v2-50Intel Core i9-10900K714212835SE +/- 0.13, N = 328.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterMobile Neural Network 2.1Model: SqueezeNetV1.0Intel Core i9-10900K0.96011.92022.88033.84044.8005SE +/- 0.017, N = 34.270
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterMobile Neural Network 2.1Model: MobileNetV2_224Intel Core i9-10900K0.61361.22721.84082.45443.068SE +/- 0.099, N = 32.730
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterMobile Neural Network 2.1Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0Intel Core i9-10900K0.73241.46482.19722.92963.662SE +/- 0.040, N = 33.260
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterMobile Neural Network 2.1Model: inception-v3Intel Core i9-10900K612182430SE +/- 0.39, N = 327.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMonkey Audio Encoding 3.99.6WAV To APEIntel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.030, N = 119.970
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMontage Astronomical Image Mosaic Engine 6.0Mosaic of M17, K band, 1.5 deg x 1.5 degIntel Core i9-10900K1530456075SE +/- 0.34, N = 1066
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterN-Queens 1.0Elapsed TimeIntel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 1610.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgdays/ns, Fewer Is BetterNAMD 2.13ATPase Simulation - 327,506 AtomsIntel Core i9-10900K0.27060.54120.81181.08241.353SE +/- 0.00071, N = 131.20000
OpenBenchmarking.orgdays/ns, Fewer Is BetterNAMD 2.14ATPase Simulation - 327,506 AtomsIntel Core i9-10900K0.28240.56480.84721.12961.412SE +/- 0.00962, N = 281.26000
OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4Test / Class: BT.CIntel Core i9-10900K6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 57.58, N = 926300
OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4Test / Class: CG.CIntel Core i9-10900K12002400360048006000SE +/- 23.66, N = 35580
OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4Test / Class: EP.CIntel Core i9-10900K400800120016002000SE +/- 5.80, N = 151787
OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4Test / Class: EP.DIntel Core i9-10900K400800120016002000SE +/- 14.83, N = 111785
OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4Test / Class: FT.CIntel Core i9-10900K3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 295.79, N = 911679
OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4Test / Class: LU.CIntel Core i9-10900K6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 318.09, N = 326546
OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4Test / Class: MG.CIntel Core i9-10900K2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 127.38, N = 911066
OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4Test / Class: SP.BIntel Core i9-10900K11002200330044005500SE +/- 30.41, N = 95268
OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4Test / Class: SP.CIntel Core i9-10900K11002200330044005500SE +/- 30.25, N = 35009
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterNatron 2.4.3Input: SpaceshipIntel Core i9-10900K0.721.442.162.883.6SE +/- 0.13, N = 33.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterNGINX Benchmark 1.9.9Static Web Page ServingIntel Core i9-10900K10K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 1018.71, N = 1246569
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterNgspice 34Circuit: C2670Intel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 3.81, N = 10100
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterNgspice 34Circuit: C7552Intel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 2.76, N = 1084
OpenBenchmarking.orgruns/s, More Is BetterNode.js V8 Web Tooling BenchmarkIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.06, N = 1214.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterNumenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1Detector: Relative EntropyIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.08, N = 1616.80
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterNumenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1Detector: Windowed GaussianIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.10, N = 168.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterNumenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1Detector: Earthgecko SkylineIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.34, N = 1692
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterNumenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1Detector: Bayesian ChangepointIntel Core i9-10900K816243240SE +/- 0.49, N = 1634.30
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterNumpy BenchmarkIntel Core i9-10900K100200300400500SE +/- 7.63, N = 20443
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOCRMyPDF 9.6.0+dfsgProcessing 60 Page PDF DocumentIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.02, N = 1119.80
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOgg Audio Encoding 1.3.4WAV To OggIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.02, N = 316.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOpenJPEG 2.4Encode: NASA Curiosity Panorama M34Intel Core i9-10900K12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 71.94, N = 456699
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenSCADRender: PistolIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 1.14, N = 592
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenSCADRender: Retro CarIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.15, N = 316.30
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenSCADRender: Mini-ITX CaseIntel Core i9-10900K918273645SE +/- 0.25, N = 539.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenSCADRender: Leonardo Phone Case SlimIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.05, N = 516.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgSigns Per Second, More Is BetterOpenSSL 1.1.1RSA 4096-bit PerformanceIntel Core i9-10900K8001600240032004000SE +/- 67.21, N = 343530
OpenBenchmarking.orgbyte/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: SHA256Intel Core i9-10900K900M1800M2700M3600M4500MSE +/- 94399691.60, N = 74052111348
OpenBenchmarking.orgsign/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: RSA4096Intel Core i9-10900K8001600240032004000SE +/- 72.31, N = 73571
OpenBenchmarking.orgverify/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: RSA4096Intel Core i9-10900K50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 5336.37, N = 7235326
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K0.72451.4492.17352.8983.6225SE +/- 0.01, N = 33.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K30060090012001500SE +/- 3.16, N = 31545
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K0.4230.8461.2691.6922.115SE +/- 0.01, N = 31.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K6001200180024003000SE +/- 14.31, N = 32655
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K0.42530.85061.27591.70122.1265SE +/- 0.01, N = 31.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K6001200180024003000SE +/- 14.99, N = 32634
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 0.34, N = 3135
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K816243240SE +/- 0.09, N = 336.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.01, N = 37.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K150300450600750SE +/- 1.12, N = 3714
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K90180270360450SE +/- 3.88, N = 3421
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.11, N = 311.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K70140210280350SE +/- 0.43, N = 3323
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.02, N = 315.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K714212835SE +/- 0.12, N = 331.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 0.59, N = 3158
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K150300450600750SE +/- 0.50, N = 3710
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.01, N = 314.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K60120180240300SE +/- 1.83, N = 3287
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.11, N = 317.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 11.45, N = 310439
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K0.21380.42760.64140.85521.069SE +/- 0.00, N = 31.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 36.00, N = 318468
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOpenVINO 2022.2.devModel: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K0.12150.2430.36450.4860.6075SE +/- 0.00, N = 30.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOSPray 1.8.5Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVisIntel Core i9-10900K612182430SE +/- 0.08, N = 2023.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOSPray 1.8.5Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path TracerIntel Core i9-10900K0.44780.89561.34341.79122.239SE +/- 0.01, N = 142.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOSPRay Studio 0.11Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path TracerIntel Core i9-10900K30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 294.74, N = 3130630
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOSPRay Studio 0.11Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path TracerIntel Core i9-10900K50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 176.97, N = 3254455
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOSPRay Studio 0.11Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path TracerIntel Core i9-10900K30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 36.25, N = 3135146
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOSPRay Studio 0.11Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path TracerIntel Core i9-10900K60K120K180K240K300KSE +/- 299.94, N = 3263487
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOSPRay Studio 0.11Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path TracerIntel Core i9-10900K30K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 252.17, N = 3157917
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOSPRay Studio 0.11Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path TracerIntel Core i9-10900K70K140K210K280K350KSE +/- 276.53, N = 3309376
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOSPRay Studio 0.11Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path TracerIntel Core i9-10900K400800120016002000SE +/- 1.15, N = 31946
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOSPRay Studio 0.11Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path TracerIntel Core i9-10900K5001000150020002500SE +/- 4.91, N = 32390
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOSPRay Studio 0.11Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path TracerIntel Core i9-10900K7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 57.14, N = 331242
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOSPRay Studio 0.11Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path TracerIntel Core i9-10900K15K30K45K60K75KSE +/- 64.12, N = 368764
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOSPRay Studio 0.11Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path TracerIntel Core i9-10900K8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 54.05, N = 338161
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterOSPRay Studio 0.11Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path TracerIntel Core i9-10900K20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 52.00, N = 382700
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterParallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.13FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img CompressionIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.102, N = 36.890
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterParboil 2.5Test: OpenMP LBMIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 0.84, N = 4166
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterParboil 2.5Test: OpenMP StencilIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.13, N = 416.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterParboil 2.5Test: OpenMP MRI GriddingIntel Core i9-10900K1224364860SE +/- 0.26, N = 455.30
OpenBenchmarking.orgHydro Cycle Time - Seconds, Fewer Is BetterPennant 1.0.1Test: sedovbigIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.15, N = 496
OpenBenchmarking.orgHydro Cycle Time - Seconds, Fewer Is BetterPennant 1.0.1Test: leblancbigIntel Core i9-10900K1632486480SE +/- 0.08, N = 471
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: Pod2htmlIntel Core i9-10900K0.02190.04380.06570.08760.1095SE +/- 0.00065, N = 180.10000
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: InterpreterIntel Core i9-10900K0.00020.00040.00060.00080.001SE +/- 0.00001, N = 18
OpenBenchmarking.orgResponses Per Second, More Is BetterPJSIP 2.11Method: INVITEIntel Core i9-10900K12002400360048006000SE +/- 0.48, N = 45428
OpenBenchmarking.orgResponses Per Second, More Is BetterPJSIP 2.11Method: OPTIONS, StatefulIntel Core i9-10900K2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 2.50, N = 49826
OpenBenchmarking.orgResponses Per Second, More Is BetterPJSIP 2.11Method: OPTIONS, StatelessIntel Core i9-10900K11K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 229.22, N = 449283
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterPlaidMLFP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.15, N = 1318.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterPlaidMLFP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPUIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.01, N = 137.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPolyhedron Fortran BenchmarksBenchmark: acIntel Core i9-10900K0.9721.9442.9163.8884.86SE +/- 0.02, N = 54.30
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 12.0Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K60K120K180K240K300KSE +/- 12825.57, N = 9295118
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 247.61, N = 731583
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K0.00720.01440.02160.02880.036SE +/- 0.000, N = 70.030
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read WriteIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 26.50, N = 7777
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K0.29180.58360.87541.16721.459SE +/- 0.043, N = 71.300
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K80K160K240K320K400KSE +/- 850.28, N = 7381185
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K0.02950.0590.08850.1180.1475SE +/- 0.000, N = 70.130
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K80K160K240K320K400KSE +/- 1118.26, N = 4364725
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K0.06190.12380.18570.24760.3095SE +/- 0.001, N = 40.280
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K70K140K210K280K350KSE +/- 1183.40, N = 4343166
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K0.1640.3280.4920.6560.82SE +/- 0.002, N = 40.730
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read WriteIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 26.19, N = 7793
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K1428425670SE +/- 2.11, N = 764
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 175.83, N = 527887
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K0.00810.01620.02430.03240.0405SE +/- 0.000, N = 50.040
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read WriteIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 11.80, N = 4867
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 1.64, N = 4116
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K70K140K210K280K350KSE +/- 1809.50, N = 7314573
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K0.03580.07160.10740.14320.179SE +/- 0.001, N = 70.160
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K70K140K210K280K350KSE +/- 1635.11, N = 3313100
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K0.0720.1440.2160.2880.36SE +/- 0.00, N = 30.30
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K60K120K180K240K300KSE +/- 6572.87, N = 3272008
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K0.2070.4140.6210.8281.035SE +/- 0.02, N = 30.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read OnlyIntel Core i9-10900K60K120K180K240K300KSE +/- 3652.16, N = 3272928
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K0.04140.08280.12420.16560.207SE +/- 0.002, N = 30.180
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read WriteIntel Core i9-10900K2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 156.78, N = 39155
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.19, N = 311.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read WriteIntel Core i9-10900K2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 47.18, N = 39148
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 13.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average LatencyIntel Core i9-10900K612182430SE +/- 0.12, N = 327.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPOV-Ray 3.7.0.7Trace TimeIntel Core i9-10900K816243240SE +/- 0.34, N = 2135.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPrimesieve 7.41e12 Prime Number GenerationIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.06, N = 1117.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPrimesieve 7.71e12 Prime Number GenerationIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.08, N = 317.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPrimesieve 8.0Length: 1e12Intel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.10, N = 316.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPrimesieve 8.0Length: 1e13Intel Core i9-10900K50100150200250SE +/- 1.19, N = 3216
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPyHPC Benchmarks 3.0Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral MixingIntel Core i9-10900K0.00160.00320.00480.00640.008SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.010
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPyHPC Benchmarks 3.0Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 65536 - Benchmark: Equation of StateIntel Core i9-10900K0.00320.00640.00960.01280.016SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.010
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPyHPC Benchmarks 3.0Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 16384 - Benchmark: Isoneutral MixingIntel Core i9-10900K0.00110.00220.00330.00440.0055SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.010
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPyHPC Benchmarks 3.0Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of StateIntel Core i9-10900K0.00270.00540.00810.01080.0135SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.010
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPyHPC Benchmarks 3.0Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral MixingIntel Core i9-10900K0.01440.02880.04320.05760.072SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.060
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPyHPC Benchmarks 3.0Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral MixingIntel Core i9-10900K0.02570.05140.07710.10280.1285SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.110
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPyHPC Benchmarks 3.0Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Equation of StateIntel Core i9-10900K0.00380.00760.01140.01520.019SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.020
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPyHPC Benchmarks 3.0Device: CPU - Backend: Aesara - Project Size: 262144 - Benchmark: Isoneutral MixingIntel Core i9-10900K0.01820.03640.05460.07280.091SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.080
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPyHPC Benchmarks 3.0Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral MixingIntel Core i9-10900K0.06530.13060.19590.26120.3265SE +/- 0.00, N = 30.30
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPyHPC Benchmarks 3.0Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of StateIntel Core i9-10900K0.04520.09040.13560.18080.226SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.200
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPyHPC Benchmarks 3.0Device: CPU - Backend: Numba - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Isoneutral MixingIntel Core i9-10900K0.27020.54040.81061.08081.351SE +/- 0.000, N = 31.200
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPyHPC Benchmarks 3.0Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Equation of StateIntel Core i9-10900K0.0560.1120.1680.2240.28SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.250
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPyHPC Benchmarks 3.0Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 1048576 - Benchmark: Isoneutral MixingIntel Core i9-10900K0.11540.23080.34620.46160.577SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.510
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPyHPC Benchmarks 3.0Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of StateIntel Core i9-10900K0.28510.57020.85531.14041.4255SE +/- 0.000, N = 31.270
OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: goIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 2.90, N = 19195
OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: 2to3Intel Core i9-10900K60120180240300SE +/- 1.94, N = 19255
OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: chaosIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 1.56, N = 2084
OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: nbodyIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 1.44, N = 2695
OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: pathlibIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.12, N = 3214.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: raytraceIntel Core i9-10900K80160240320400SE +/- 6.55, N = 23367
OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: crypto_pyaesIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 1.40, N = 2785
OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: pickle_pure_pythonIntel Core i9-10900K70140210280350SE +/- 5.00, N = 19340
OpenBenchmarking.orgMFLOPS, More Is BetterQuantLib 1.21Intel Core i9-10900K6001200180024003000SE +/- 40.19, N = 93000
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterQuantum ESPRESSO 7.0Input: AUSURF112Intel Core i9-10900K150300450600750SE +/- 11.59, N = 6704
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRadiance Benchmark 5.0Test: SerialIntel Core i9-10900K130260390520650SE +/- 1.79, N = 18582
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRadiance Benchmark 5.0Test: SMP ParallelIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 0.26, N = 17184
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRAR Compression 6.0.2Linux Source Tree Archiving To RARIntel Core i9-10900K918273645SE +/- 0.15, N = 441.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRawTherapeeTotal Benchmark TimeIntel Core i9-10900K1224364860SE +/- 0.21, N = 4054.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgmrays/s, More Is Betterrays1bench 2020-01-09Large SceneIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.17, N = 1481
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 5.0.5Test: LPUSHIntel Core i9-10900K500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 22380.76, N = 42224637
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 50Intel Core i9-10900K700K1400K2100K2800K3500KSE +/- 197480.17, N = 33361169
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50Intel Core i9-10900K500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 118750.97, N = 32439227
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500Intel Core i9-10900K700K1400K2100K2800K3500KSE +/- 8463.29, N = 33260122
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50Intel Core i9-10900K600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 61662.45, N = 33011218
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500Intel Core i9-10900K600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 16661.50, N = 32647115
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000Intel Core i9-10900K600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 39934.28, N = 33026468
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50Intel Core i9-10900K500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 20681.52, N = 32142131
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500Intel Core i9-10900K600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 25142.46, N = 32943954
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000Intel Core i9-10900K500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 157384.42, N = 32464494
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000Intel Core i9-10900K500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 21470.41, N = 32293364
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500Intel Core i9-10900K500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 66253.09, N = 32223189
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000Intel Core i9-10900K600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 43531.49, N = 32981447
OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 7.0.4Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000Intel Core i9-10900K500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 82388.57, N = 32195364
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.10.0Test: Scala DottyIntel Core i9-10900K30060090012001500SE +/- 45.74, N = 131206
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.10.0Test: Twitter HTTP RequestsIntel Core i9-10900K400800120016002000SE +/- 20.58, N = 221987
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.10.0Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + FuturesIntel Core i9-10900K30060090012001500SE +/- 7.67, N = 141246
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRNNoise 2020-06-28Intel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.07, N = 1420.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 2.4Test: OpenMP CFD SolverIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.24, N = 718.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 2.4Test: OpenMP StreamclusterIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.25, N = 517.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 2.4Test: OpenMP LavaMDIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.09, N = 721.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 3.1Test: OpenMP LavaMDIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 1.90, N = 25176
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 3.1Test: OpenMP HotSpot3DIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.19, N = 1984
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 3.1Test: OpenMP LeukocyteIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.26, N = 2085
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 3.1Test: OpenMP CFD SolverIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.22, N = 2518.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 3.1Test: OpenMP StreamclusterIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.43, N = 1718.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRust MandelbrotTime To Complete Serial/Parallel MandelbrotIntel Core i9-10900K918273645SE +/- 0.36, N = 339.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterScikit-Learn 0.22.1Intel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.039, N = 108.680
OpenBenchmarking.orgmarks, More Is BetterSecureMark 1.0.4Benchmark: SecureMark-TLSIntel Core i9-10900K70K140K210K280K350KSE +/- 1330.56, N = 6305495
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: FirefoxIntel Core i9-10900K816243240SE +/- 0.60, N = 3237.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgRuns Per Minute, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Speedometer - Browser: FirefoxIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 1.55, N = 32113
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google ChromeIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.21, N = 1916.30
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Google ChromeIntel Core i9-10900K60120180240300SE +/- 5.04, N = 12275
OpenBenchmarking.orgRuns Per Minute, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google ChromeIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 4.51, N = 22148
OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Octane - Browser: Google ChromeIntel Core i9-10900K13K26K39K52K65KSE +/- 1019.83, N = 1558683
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: FirefoxIntel Core i9-10900K50100150200250SE +/- 5.67, N = 23240
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google ChromeIntel Core i9-10900K60120180240300SE +/- 4.34, N = 13280
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: FirefoxIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 1.85, N = 38107
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google ChromeIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 2.41, N = 23165
OpenBenchmarking.orgRuns / Minute, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: StyleBench - Browser: FirefoxIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 2.56, N = 31112
OpenBenchmarking.orgRuns / Minute, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google ChromeIntel Core i9-10900K918273645SE +/- 0.56, N = 2338
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google ChromeIntel Core i9-10900K160320480640800SE +/- 10.11, N = 27751
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: FirefoxIntel Core i9-10900K612182430SE +/- 0.14, N = 3627.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: FirefoxIntel Core i9-10900K90180270360450SE +/- 1.27, N = 34418
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google ChromeIntel Core i9-10900K70140210280350SE +/- 1.97, N = 26339
OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is Bettersimdjson 2.0Throughput Test: KostyaIntel Core i9-10900K0.69751.3952.09252.793.4875SE +/- 0.00, N = 33.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is Bettersimdjson 2.0Throughput Test: TopTweetIntel Core i9-10900K1.13182.26363.39544.52725.659SE +/- 0.01, N = 35.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is Bettersimdjson 2.0Throughput Test: LargeRandomIntel Core i9-10900K0.24980.49960.74940.99921.249SE +/- 0.00, N = 31.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is Bettersimdjson 2.0Throughput Test: PartialTweetsIntel Core i9-10900K1.0172.0343.0514.0685.085SE +/- 0.01, N = 34.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is Bettersimdjson 2.0Throughput Test: DistinctUserIDIntel Core i9-10900K1.17232.34463.51694.68925.8615SE +/- 0.01, N = 35.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSmallpt 1.0Global Illumination Renderer; 128 SamplesIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.091, N = 357.880
OpenBenchmarking.orgusec, Fewer Is BetterSockperf 3.4Test: Latency Ping PongIntel Core i9-10900K0.69571.39142.08712.78283.4785SE +/- 0.078, N = 133.090
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite Speedtest 3.30Timed Time - Size 1,000Intel Core i9-10900K1122334455SE +/- 0.22, N = 4446.30
OpenBenchmarking.orgSamples / Second, More Is BettersrsRAN 22.04.1Test: OFDM_TestIntel Core i9-10900K30M60M90M120M150MSE +/- 808977.41, N = 3132433333
OpenBenchmarking.orgeNb Mb/s, More Is BettersrsRAN 22.04.1Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAMIntel Core i9-10900K90180270360450SE +/- 1.88, N = 3435
OpenBenchmarking.orgUE Mb/s, More Is BettersrsRAN 22.04.1Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 64-QAMIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 0.59, N = 3139
OpenBenchmarking.orgeNb Mb/s, More Is BettersrsRAN 22.04.1Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAMIntel Core i9-10900K100200300400500SE +/- 4.11, N = 3444
OpenBenchmarking.orgUE Mb/s, More Is BettersrsRAN 22.04.1Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 64-QAMIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 1.30, N = 3172
OpenBenchmarking.orgeNb Mb/s, More Is BettersrsRAN 22.04.1Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAMIntel Core i9-10900K100200300400500SE +/- 0.95, N = 3472
OpenBenchmarking.orgUE Mb/s, More Is BettersrsRAN 22.04.1Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB MIMO 256-QAMIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 0.57, N = 3152
OpenBenchmarking.orgeNb Mb/s, More Is BettersrsRAN 22.04.1Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAMIntel Core i9-10900K100200300400500SE +/- 2.94, N = 3472
OpenBenchmarking.orgUE Mb/s, More Is BettersrsRAN 22.04.1Test: 4G PHY_DL_Test 100 PRB SISO 256-QAMIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 1.03, N = 3180
OpenBenchmarking.orgeNb Mb/s, More Is BettersrsRAN 22.04.1Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAMIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 1.04, N = 3137
OpenBenchmarking.orgUE Mb/s, More Is BettersrsRAN 22.04.1Test: 5G PHY_DL_NR Test 52 PRB SISO 64-QAMIntel Core i9-10900K1530456075SE +/- 0.03, N = 368
OpenBenchmarking.orgRender Ratio, More Is BetterStargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 512Intel Core i9-10900K0.82241.64482.46723.28964.112SE +/- 0.00714, N = 33.66000
OpenBenchmarking.orgRender Ratio, More Is BetterStargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 512Intel Core i9-10900K0.60241.20481.80722.40963.012SE +/- 0.0087, N = 32.6800
OpenBenchmarking.orgRender Ratio, More Is BetterStargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 512Intel Core i9-10900K0.4160.8321.2481.6642.08SE +/- 0.00349, N = 31.85000
OpenBenchmarking.orgRender Ratio, More Is BetterStargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9Sample Rate: 44100 - Buffer Size: 1024Intel Core i9-10900K0.84131.68262.52393.36524.2065SE +/- 0.00701, N = 33.74000
OpenBenchmarking.orgRender Ratio, More Is BetterStargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 512Intel Core i9-10900K0.78461.56922.35383.13843.923SE +/- 0.00860, N = 33.49000
OpenBenchmarking.orgRender Ratio, More Is BetterStargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9Sample Rate: 96000 - Buffer Size: 1024Intel Core i9-10900K0.61661.23321.84982.46643.083SE +/- 0.00234, N = 32.74000
OpenBenchmarking.orgRender Ratio, More Is BetterStargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9Sample Rate: 192000 - Buffer Size: 1024Intel Core i9-10900K0.42550.8511.27651.7022.1275SE +/- 0.00319, N = 31.89000
OpenBenchmarking.orgRender Ratio, More Is BetterStargate Digital Audio Workstation 21.10.9Sample Rate: 480000 - Buffer Size: 1024Intel Core i9-10900K0.80451.6092.41353.2184.0225SE +/- 0.00197, N = 33.58000
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterStockfish 13Total TimeIntel Core i9-10900K7M14M21M28M35MSE +/- 531376.44, N = 1234136846
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterStockfish 15Total TimeIntel Core i9-10900K6M12M18M24M30MSE +/- 605936.24, N = 830153257
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterStockfish 9Total TimeIntel Core i9-10900K7M14M21M28M35MSE +/- 487767.20, N = 3334987625
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: CryptoIntel Core i9-10900K6001200180024003000SE +/- 0.76, N = 52625
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: ForkingIntel Core i9-10900K14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 2749.54, N = 366062
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: SENDFILEIntel Core i9-10900K50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 11445.44, N = 5223099
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: CPU CacheIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 3.44, N = 4164
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: CPU StressIntel Core i9-10900K5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 533.18, N = 525396
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: Vector MathIntel Core i9-10900K10K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 1947.48, N = 545777
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: Socket ActivityIntel Core i9-10900K2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 116.85, N = 38760
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: System V Message PassingIntel Core i9-10900K2M4M6M8M10MSE +/- 7060.72, N = 39355010
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: MMAPIntel Core i9-10900K70140210280350SE +/- 0.09, N = 3328
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: NUMAIntel Core i9-10900K60120180240300SE +/- 2.94, N = 3269
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: MEMFDIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 7.03, N = 31099
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: AtomicIntel Core i9-10900K40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 4382.15, N = 3185418
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: CryptoIntel Core i9-10900K3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 11.17, N = 315816
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: MallocIntel Core i9-10900K3M6M9M12M15MSE +/- 15225.01, N = 311938005
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: ForkingIntel Core i9-10900K20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 663.89, N = 378460
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: IO_uringIntel Core i9-10900K10K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 201.19, N = 347375
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: SENDFILEIntel Core i9-10900K40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 188.08, N = 3194763
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: CPU CacheIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 3.21, N = 3140
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: CPU StressIntel Core i9-10900K6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 225.43, N = 327496
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: SemaphoresIntel Core i9-10900K500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 5237.53, N = 32101298
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: Matrix MathIntel Core i9-10900K14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 202.91, N = 363136
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: Vector MathIntel Core i9-10900K11K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 80.43, N = 350275
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: Socket ActivityIntel Core i9-10900K15003000450060007500SE +/- 33.39, N = 37002
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: Context SwitchingIntel Core i9-10900K500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 87889.11, N = 32540289
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: Glibc C String FunctionsIntel Core i9-10900K400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 110540.16, N = 31683364
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: Glibc Qsort Data SortingIntel Core i9-10900K50100150200250SE +/- 0.33, N = 3223
OpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.14Test: System V Message PassingIntel Core i9-10900K2M4M6M8M10MSE +/- 9334.57, N = 310825617
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSudokut 0.4Total TimeIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.138, N = 88.860
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSunflow Rendering System 0.07.2Global Illumination + Image SynthesisIntel Core i9-10900K0.17890.35780.53670.71560.8945SE +/- 0.004, N = 160.800
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.8Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080pIntel Core i9-10900K0.9811.9622.9433.9244.905SE +/- 0.03, N = 344.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.8Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080pIntel Core i9-10900K918273645SE +/- 0.29, N = 3439.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 1.2Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4KIntel Core i9-10900K918273645SE +/- 0.39, N = 338.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 1.2Encoder Mode: Preset 10 - Input: Bosphorus 4KIntel Core i9-10900K1632486480SE +/- 1.17, N = 374
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.5.0Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 1080pIntel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.05, N = 1310.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.5.0Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 4KIntel Core i9-10900K0.5671.1341.7012.2682.835SE +/- 0.00, N = 32.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.5.0Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 4KIntel Core i9-10900K1122334455SE +/- 0.02, N = 346.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.5.0Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 4KIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.31, N = 381
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.3Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4KIntel Core i9-10900K1224364860SE +/- 0.20, N = 352.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.3Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4KIntel Core i9-10900K1224364860SE +/- 0.22, N = 355.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.3Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 4KIntel Core i9-10900K1224364860SE +/- 0.15, N = 352.30
OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterSwet 1.5.16AverageIntel Core i9-10900K200M400M600M800M1000MSE +/- 7303503.66, N = 7956572868
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTachyon 0.99.2Total TimeIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 0.07, N = 4117
OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds, Fewer Is BetterTensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18Model: SqueezeNetIntel Core i9-10900K5001000150020002500SE +/- 4.88, N = 32308
OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds, Fewer Is BetterTensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18Model: Inception V4Intel Core i9-10900K8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 150.00, N = 338740
OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds, Fewer Is BetterTensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18Model: NASNet MobileIntel Core i9-10900K2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 8.71, N = 38763
OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds, Fewer Is BetterTensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18Model: Mobilenet FloatIntel Core i9-10900K400800120016002000SE +/- 22.52, N = 31901
OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds, Fewer Is BetterTensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18Model: Mobilenet QuantIntel Core i9-10900K6001200180024003000SE +/- 18.82, N = 32958
OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds, Fewer Is BetterTensorFlow Lite 2022-05-18Model: Inception ResNet V2Intel Core i9-10900K7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 93.40, N = 332672
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTesseract OCR 4.1.1Time To OCR 7 ImagesIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.10, N = 2319.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Apache Compilation 2.4.41Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.23, N = 3717.80
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed CPython Compilation 3.10.6Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO OptimizedIntel Core i9-10900K50100150200250SE +/- 0.80, N = 3243
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K1530456075SE +/- 1.34, N = 1465
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Erlang/OTP Compilation 23.2Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 2.75, N = 1098
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.11, N = 382
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K1122334455SE +/- 0.05, N = 348.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed GCC Compilation 11.2.0Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 3.19, N = 4872
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed GCC Compilation 9.3.0Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K160320480640800SE +/- 10.89, N = 27735
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K1326395265SE +/- 0.15, N = 356.30
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.93, N = 2378
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Gem5 Compilation 21.2Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K80160240320400SE +/- 0.25, N = 3356
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 1.93, N = 10107
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed HMMer Search 3.3.1Pfam Database SearchIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.15, N = 1496
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed HMMer Search 3.3.2Pfam Database SearchIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.09, N = 5107
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K612182430SE +/- 0.38, N = 2425.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.10.20Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K1530456075SE +/- 1.27, N = 869
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K1632486480SE +/- 0.75, N = 871
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.18Build: defconfigIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.09, N = 376
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.18Build: allmodconfigIntel Core i9-10900K2004006008001000SE +/- 0.17, N = 3922
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K1428425670SE +/- 0.27, N = 4363
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1Build: defconfigIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 2.81, N = 588
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed LLVM Compilation 10.0Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K110220330440550SE +/- 7.43, N = 38520
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed LLVM Compilation 12.0Build System: NinjaIntel Core i9-10900K130260390520650SE +/- 0.12, N = 4579
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed LLVM Compilation 13.0Build System: NinjaIntel Core i9-10900K130260390520650SE +/- 0.15, N = 3584
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed LLVM Compilation 13.0Build System: Unix MakefilesIntel Core i9-10900K130260390520650SE +/- 11.43, N = 5591
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed MAFFT Alignment 7.471Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNAIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.041, N = 198.530
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Mesa Compilation 21.0Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K1020304050SE +/- 0.51, N = 944.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed MPlayer Compilation 1.5Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K714212835SE +/- 0.10, N = 629.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7Primate Phylogeny AnalysisIntel Core i9-10900K1428425670SE +/- 0.25, N = 2564
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7Primate Phylogeny AnalysisIntel Core i9-10900K20406080100SE +/- 0.20, N = 597
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Node.js Compilation 15.11Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K80160240320400SE +/- 6.68, N = 7380
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Node.js Compilation 18.8Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K120240360480600SE +/- 0.32, N = 3549
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed PHP Compilation 7.4.2Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K1122334455SE +/- 1.06, N = 3448.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Wasmer Compilation 2.3Time To CompileIntel Core i9-10900K1326395265SE +/- 0.24, N = 357.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterTNN 0.3Target: CPU - Model: DenseNetIntel Core i9-10900K6001200180024003000SE +/- 21.58, N = 42847
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterTNN 0.3Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2Intel Core i9-10900K60120180240300SE +/- 3.88, N = 5279
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterTNN 0.3Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1Intel Core i9-10900K60120180240300SE +/- 1.76, N = 5259
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BettertoyBrot Fractal Generator 2020-11-18Implementation: OpenMPIntel Core i9-10900K7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 131.46, N = 633484
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BettertoyBrot Fractal Generator 2020-11-18Implementation: C++ TasksIntel Core i9-10900K7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 18.69, N = 633240
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BettertoyBrot Fractal Generator 2020-11-18Implementation: C++ ThreadsIntel Core i9-10900K7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 87.79, N = 633019
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterTTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3bPhong Rendering With Soft-Shadow MappingIntel Core i9-10900K150300450600750SE +/- 4.60, N = 19711
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Scene: HairIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.09, N = 1620
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Scene: Water CausticIntel Core i9-10900K612182430SE +/- 0.24, N = 1624.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Scene: Volumetric CausticIntel Core i9-10900K246810SE +/- 0.048, N = 156.890
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterUnpacking Firefox 84.0Extracting: firefox-84.0.source.tar.xzIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.04, N = 1115.30
OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is BetterViennaCL 1.7.1Test: CPU BLAS - sCOPYIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.03, N = 322.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is BetterViennaCL 1.7.1Test: CPU BLAS - sAXPYIntel Core i9-10900K816243240SE +/- 0.09, N = 333.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is BetterViennaCL 1.7.1Test: CPU BLAS - sDOTIntel Core i9-10900K816243240SE +/- 0.03, N = 336.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is BetterViennaCL 1.7.1Test: CPU BLAS - dCOPYIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.03, N = 320.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is BetterViennaCL 1.7.1Test: CPU BLAS - dAXPYIntel Core i9-10900K714212835SE +/- 0.00, N = 329.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is BetterViennaCL 1.7.1Test: CPU BLAS - dDOTIntel Core i9-10900K714212835SE +/- 0.00, N = 332.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is BetterViennaCL 1.7.1Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-NIntel Core i9-10900K918273645SE +/- 0.00, N = 340.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgGB/s, More Is BetterViennaCL 1.7.1Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMV-TIntel Core i9-10900K1020304050SE +/- 0.03, N = 342.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgGFLOPs/s, More Is BetterViennaCL 1.7.1Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NNIntel Core i9-10900K918273645SE +/- 0.09, N = 337
OpenBenchmarking.orgGFLOPs/s, More Is BetterViennaCL 1.7.1Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-NTIntel Core i9-10900K816243240SE +/- 0.12, N = 335.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgGFLOPs/s, More Is BetterViennaCL 1.7.1Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TNIntel Core i9-10900K918273645SE +/- 0.03, N = 338.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgGFLOPs/s, More Is BetterViennaCL 1.7.1Test: CPU BLAS - dGEMM-TTIntel Core i9-10900K816243240SE +/- 0.03, N = 336.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterVOSK Speech Recognition Toolkit 0.3.21Intel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.07, N = 416
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterWavPack Audio Encoding 5.3WAV To WavPackIntel Core i9-10900K3691215SE +/- 0.05, N = 1112.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgEncode Time - Seconds, Fewer Is BetterWebP Image Encode 1.1Encode Settings: Quality 100, LosslessIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.06, N = 2814.80
OpenBenchmarking.orgEncode Time - Seconds, Fewer Is BetterWebP Image Encode 1.1Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest CompressionIntel Core i9-10900K714212835SE +/- 0.09, N = 2430.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgMP/s, More Is BetterWebP Image Encode 1.2.4Encode Settings: Quality 100, LosslessIntel Core i9-10900K0.3870.7741.1611.5481.935SE +/- 0.03, N = 31.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgMP/s, More Is BetterWebP Image Encode 1.2.4Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest CompressionIntel Core i9-10900K0.1530.3060.4590.6120.765SE +/- 0.00, N = 30.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgMP/s, More Is BetterWebP2 Image Encode 20220823Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7Intel Core i9-10900K0.03380.06760.10140.13520.169SE +/- 0.00, N = 30.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgMP/s, More Is BetterWebP2 Image Encode 20220823Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7Intel Core i9-10900K0.01580.03160.04740.06320.079SE +/- 0.00, N = 30.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgMP/s, More Is BetterWebP2 Image Encode 20220823Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless CompressionIntel Core i9-10900K0.00450.0090.01350.0180.0225SE +/- 0.00, N = 3
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterWireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress TestIntel Core i9-10900K4080120160200SE +/- 1.24, N = 33175
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2019-12-17H.264 Video EncodingIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 1.57, N = 18125
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2022-02-22Video Input: Bosphorus 4KIntel Core i9-10900K816243240SE +/- 0.06, N = 432.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2022-02-22Video Input: Bosphorus 1080pIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 0.55, N = 4138
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx265 3.4Video Input: Bosphorus 4KIntel Core i9-10900K510152025SE +/- 0.10, N = 2118.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx265 3.4Video Input: Bosphorus 1080pIntel Core i9-10900K1632486480SE +/- 0.10, N = 1671
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterXcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per DirectionIntel Core i9-10900K918273645SE +/- 0.36, N = 740.50
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterXcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per DirectionIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 0.32, N = 7146
OpenBenchmarking.orgH/s, More Is BetterXmrig 6.12.1Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1MIntel Core i9-10900K5001000150020002500SE +/- 2.27, N = 52140
OpenBenchmarking.orgH/s, More Is BetterXmrig 6.12.1Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1MIntel Core i9-10900K10002000300040005000SE +/- 37.80, N = 74527
OpenBenchmarking.orgLookups/s, More Is BetterXsbench 2017-07-06Intel Core i9-10900K600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 5375.00, N = 32634205
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterXZ Compression 5.2.4Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9Intel Core i9-10900K612182430SE +/- 0.49, N = 2723.60
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterYafaRay 3.5.1Total Time For Sample SceneIntel Core i9-10900K306090120150SE +/- 0.26, N = 3112
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd CompressionCompression Level: 3 - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K5001000150020002500SE +/- 0.00, N = 32519
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd CompressionCompression Level: 3 - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K9001800270036004500SE +/- 0.00, N = 33990
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd CompressionCompression Level: 8 - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K70140210280350SE +/- 0.00, N = 3300
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd CompressionCompression Level: 8 - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K9001800270036004500SE +/- 0.00, N = 34080
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd CompressionCompression Level: 19 - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K816243240SE +/- 0.00, N = 337.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd CompressionCompression Level: 19 - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K8001600240032004000SE +/- 0.00, N = 33674
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd CompressionCompression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K110220330440550SE +/- 0.00, N = 3490
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd CompressionCompression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K9001800270036004500SE +/- 0.00, N = 34260
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd CompressionCompression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K90180270360450SE +/- 0.00, N = 3402
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd CompressionCompression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K9001800270036004500SE +/- 0.00, N = 34366
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd CompressionCompression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K48121620SE +/- 0.00, N = 315.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd CompressionCompression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K8001600240032004000SE +/- 0.00, N = 33772
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.4.9Compression Level: 3 - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K5001000150020002500SE +/- 7.47, N = 32325
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.4.9Compression Level: 8 - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K60120180240300SE +/- 1.54, N = 5281
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.4.9Compression Level: 8 - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K9001800270036004500SE +/- 8.46, N = 74412
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.4.9Compression Level: 3 - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K9001800270036004500SE +/- 11.36, N = 34366
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 3 - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K5001000150020002500SE +/- 77.21, N = 42384
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 3 - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K9001800270036004500SE +/- 33.72, N = 44235
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 8 - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K9001800270036004500SE +/- 42.13, N = 64277
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 19 - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K816243240SE +/- 1.15, N = 634.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 19 - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K8001600240032004000SE +/- 23.17, N = 53828
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K30060090012001500SE +/- 5.84, N = 41318
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K10002000300040005000SE +/- 17.46, N = 44546
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K120240360480600SE +/- 17.40, N = 4551
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K10002000300040005000SE +/- 6.50, N = 44656
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K714212835SE +/- 0.88, N = 530.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression SpeedIntel Core i9-10900K8001600240032004000SE +/- 10.55, N = 53848