WebP2 Image Encode

This is a test of Google's libwebp2 library with the WebP2 image encode utility and using a sample 6000x4000 pixel JPEG image as the input, similar to the WebP/libwebp test profile. WebP2 is currently experimental and under heavy development as ultimately the successor to WebP. WebP2 supports 10-bit HDR, more efficienct lossy compression, improved lossless compression, animation support, and full multi-threading support compared to WebP.

To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark webp2.

Project Site

chromium.googlesource.com

Test Created

26 January 2021

Last Updated

26 January 2021

Test Maintainer

Michael Larabel 

Test Type

Processor

Average Install Time

1 Minute, 7 Seconds

Average Run Time

23 Minutes, 8 Seconds

Test Dependencies

C/C++ Compiler Toolchain + JPEG Library + CMake

Supported Platforms

Public Result UploadsReported Installs*Test Completions*OpenBenchmarking.orgEventsWebP2 Image Encode Popularity Statisticspts/webp22021.012021.022021.03400800120016002000
* Data based on those opting to upload their test results to OpenBenchmarking.org and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform.
Data current as of Wed, 03 Mar 2021 08:15:45 GMT.
Quality 95, Compression Effort 722.3%Default19.0%Quality 75, Compression Effort 723.0%Quality 100, Compression Effort 521.3%Quality 100, Lossless Compression14.5%Encode Settings Option PopularityOpenBenchmarking.org

Revision History

pts/webp2-1.0.0   [View Source]   Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:59:31 GMT
Add initial WebP2 test profile for experimental libwebp2. https://github.com/phoronix-test-suite/test-profiles/issues/185

Suites Using This Test

Imaging

Creator Workloads


Performance Metrics

Analyze Test Configuration:

WebP2 Image Encode 20210126

Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7

OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 357 public results since 26 January 2021 with the latest data as of 3 March 2021.

Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.

Component
Percentile Rank
# Matching Public Results
Seconds (Average)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core
99th
5
110
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core
98th
3
112
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core
97th
8
117 +/- 1
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core
95th
4
119
2 x AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core
94th
5
125 +/- 1
2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
92nd
9
132 +/- 3
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core
92nd
3
133
2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core
86th
6
137
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core
86th
3
137
AMD EPYC 7502P 32-Core
86th
3
137
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core
86th
9
137 +/- 1
AMD EPYC 7642 48-Core
83rd
3
138
AMD EPYC 7402P 24-Core
83rd
3
138
AMD EPYC 7702 64-Core
81st
8
139
AMD EPYC 7662 64-Core
78th
3
140
AMD EPYC 7552 48-Core
78th
3
140
AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core
78th
6
140 +/- 1
Mid-Tier
75th
> 141
AMD EPYC 7532 32-Core
75th
3
142
2 x Intel Xeon Gold 5220R
74th
4
143 +/- 1
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24-Core
73rd
3
146 +/- 1
Intel Core i9-10980XE
72nd
4
148 +/- 1
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 16-Core
71st
3
152
Intel Core i9-7980XE
70th
5
156 +/- 1
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core
68th
4
159 +/- 1
Ampere Altra ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 160-Core
68th
5
160 +/- 1
AMD EPYC 7302P 16-Core
65th
3
165
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core
65th
3
166 +/- 1
Intel Core i9-10900K
64th
3
170 +/- 1
AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core
63rd
3
174
2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core
62nd
3
177 +/- 3
Intel Xeon Gold 6226R
62nd
3
179 +/- 2
AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core
61st
3
187 +/- 1
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core
60th
3
195 +/- 1
AMD EPYC 7272 12-Core
59th
3
200
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-Core
58th
3
207
Intel Xeon Silver 4216
57th
3
211 +/- 1
AMD EPYC 7F32 8-Core
57th
3
227
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core
57th
3
227
Intel Core i9-9900KS
55th
3
250 +/- 1
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core
54th
3
251 +/- 1
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Eight-Core
53rd
3
265 +/- 1
Intel Core i9-9900K
53rd
3
270
Intel Xeon E-2288G
52nd
4
275 +/- 2
Median
50th
278
AMD EPYC 7232P 8-Core
50th
3
278
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Eight-Core
49th
3
292
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT 6-Core
49th
3
292
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3
47th
3
299
Intel Core i5-10600K
46th
3
301 +/- 1
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core
46th
3
311 +/- 1
Intel Core i7-8086K
45th
4
325
Intel Core i7-8700K
44th
3
326
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3
43rd
3
336 +/- 1
Ampere eMAG ARMv8 32-Core
42nd
3
360 +/- 1
Intel Xeon E-2278GEL
41st
5
393 +/- 1
Intel Core i5-9400F
40th
3
402 +/- 3
Intel Core i5-8400
39th
3
410 +/- 1
Intel Core i7-6800K
38th
3
422 +/- 2
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 4-Core
38th
3
423 +/- 1
Intel Core i7-7740K
37th
3
428 +/- 1
Intel Core i7-4960X
35th
3
436 +/- 1
Intel Core i7-10700T
34th
4
437 +/- 2
Intel Core i7-7700K
32nd
3
463
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
31st
3
480
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
30th
4
483 +/- 8
Intel Core i3-10100
29th
3
493
Intel Core i7-9750H
29th
8
501 +/- 24
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v6
27th
3
524 +/- 4
Intel Core i7-4790K
26th
3
560 +/- 30
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
26th
3
566 +/- 1
Low-Tier
25th
> 566
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
24th
3
581
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
23rd
3
586 +/- 1
Intel Core i5-7600K
23rd
3
591
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
22nd
3
601 +/- 1
Intel Core i7-5775C
21st
3
602 +/- 1
Intel Core i3-8100
20th
3
639
Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
19th
3
641 +/- 1
Intel Core i7-4770K
18th
3
652
Intel Core i7-3770K
18th
3
654
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
16th
4
673 +/- 2
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core
15th
4
676 +/- 3
Intel Core i5-4670
14th
3
697 +/- 1
Intel Core i5-6500
13th
3
702
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
13th
3
709 +/- 12
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4
11th
3
733 +/- 7
Intel Core i7-1165G7
11th
4
759 +/- 18
Intel Core i7-8550U
9th
4
787 +/- 23
Intel Xeon E3-1235L v5
8th
3
856
Intel Core i7-8565U
7th
4
859 +/- 41
Intel Core i5-3470
6th
3
906 +/- 4
Intel Core i7-1065G7
6th
7
911 +/- 35
Intel Core i3-7100
4th
3
1086 +/- 19
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
3rd
3
1418 +/- 5
Intel Core i7-5600U
2nd
3
1698
ARMv8 Cortex-A72 4-Core
1st
4
2518 +/- 5
OpenBenchmarking.orgDistribution Of Public Results - Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7357 Results Range From 109 To 2526 Seconds10915820725630535440345250155059964869774679584489394299110401089113811871236128513341383143214811530157916281677172617751824187319221971202020692118216722162265231423632412246125102559306090120150

Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 - Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7) has an average run-time of 19 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 3 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMinutesTime Required To Complete BenchmarkEncode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7Run-Time1632486480Min: 5 / Avg: 18.58 / Max: 85

Based on public OpenBenchmarking.org results, the selected test / test configuration has an average standard deviation of 0.1%.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterAverage Deviation Between RunsEncode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7Deviation246810Min: 0 / Avg: 0.13 / Max: 2

Does It Scale Well With Increasing Cores?

Yes, based on the automated analysis of the collected public benchmark data, this test / test settings does generally scale well with increasing CPU core counts. Data based on publicly available results for this test / test settings, separated by vendor, result divided by the reference CPU clock speed, grouped by matching physical CPU core count, and normalized against the smallest core count tested from each vendor for each CPU having a sufficient number of test samples and statistically significant data.

AMDIntelOpenBenchmarking.orgRelative Core Scaling To BaseWebP2 Image Encode CPU Core ScalingEncode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 74681216243248642.164.326.488.6410.8

Recent Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.org Results Compare

3 Systems - 84 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-2700K - BIOSTAR B75MU3B v5.0 - Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.9.1-050901-generic - GNOME Shell 3.34.1

1 System - 358 Benchmark Results

Ampere Altra ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 - WIWYNN Mt.Jade - Ampere Computing LLC Device e100

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.11.0-051100-generic-64k - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

3 Systems - 108 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-3770K - ECS Z77H2-A2X v1.0 - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v2

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-58-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

2 Systems - 30 Benchmark Results

Ampere Altra ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 - WIWYNN Mt.Jade - Ampere Computing LLC Device e100

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.11.0-051100-generic-64k - GCC 10.2.0

1 System - 144 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i9-10885H - HP 8736 - Intel Comet Lake PCH

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.8.0-43-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.2

5 Systems - 131 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-8086K - ASUS PRIME Z370-A - Intel 8th Gen Core

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.9.0-050900rc8daily20201009-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

8 Systems - 84 Benchmark Results

Intel Xeon E-2288G - Compulab SBC-ATCFL v1.2 - Intel Cannon Lake PCH

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.8.0-26-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.1

2 Systems - 151 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-10700T - Logic Supply RXM-181 - Intel Comet Lake PCH

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.8.0-41-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.2

1 System - 5 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core - MSI B450-A PRO MAX - AMD Starship

Arch rolling - 5.11.0-arch1-1 - Sway

5 Systems - 89 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i9-7980XE - ASUS PRIME X299-A - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.8.0-36-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.1

Most Popular Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.org Results Compare

8 Systems - 84 Benchmark Results

Intel Xeon E-2288G - Compulab SBC-ATCFL v1.2 - Intel Cannon Lake PCH

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.8.0-41-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.2

5 Systems - 89 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i9-7980XE - ASUS PRIME X299-A - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.8.0-36-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.1

3 Systems - 108 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-3770K - ECS Z77H2-A2X v1.0 - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v2

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-58-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

3 Systems - 85 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i9-9900K - ASRock Z390M Pro4 - Intel Cannon Lake PCH

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.9.0-050900rc1daily20200819-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

2 Systems - 65 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i9-7960X - MSI X299 SLI PLUS - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.4.0-65-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

3 Systems - 84 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i9-9900KS - ASUS PRIME Z390-A - Intel Cannon Lake PCH

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.9.0-050900rc8daily20201005-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.2

4 Systems - 23 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core - ASRock X570 Pro4 - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.11.0-rc1-phx - GNOME Shell 3.38.1

3 Systems - 75 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core - MSI Creator TRX40 - AMD Starship

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.9.0-rc5-14sep-patch - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

3 Systems - 23 Benchmark Results

Intel Xeon E3-1235L v5 - ASRockRack C236M WS - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5

Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.8.0-050800-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4

3 Systems - 69 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i5-3470 - ECS H61H2-I3 v1.0 - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v2

Ubuntu 19.10 - 5.9.0-050900rc8daily20201010-generic - GNOME Shell 3.34.3

5 Systems - 118 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core - ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO - AMD Starship

salientos rolling - 5.10.14-arch1-1 - Xfce 4.16
Find More Test Results