2 x AMD EPYC 7713 vs. 2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 vs. 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Add another performance-per-dollar value in the table above to see customized performance-per-dollar graphs.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 220 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

2 x AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core had the most wins, coming in first place for 55% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (2 x AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core) was 1.426x the speed of the slowest (2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280). 2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core was 0.904x the speed of 2 x AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core and 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 was 0.776x the speed of 2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core.

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: OpenSSL (Algorithm: SHA256) at 8.669x, BRL-CAD (VGR Performance Metric) at 8.526x, ASKAP (Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding) at 3.951x, ASKAP (Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding) at 3.775x, OpenVINO (Model: Vehicle Detection FP16 - Device: CPU) at 2.712x, m-queens (Time To Solve) at 2.669x, Stress-NG (Test: Crypto) at 2.666x, PyHPC Benchmarks (Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State) at 2.655x, 7-Zip Compression (Test: Decompression Rating) at 2.505x, Stress-NG (Test: Malloc) at 2.303x.

220 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread