2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 vs. 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Add another performance-per-dollar value in the table above to see customized performance-per-dollar graphs.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 332 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core had the most wins, coming in first place for 89% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (2 x AMD EPYC 75F3 32-Core) was 1.278x the speed of the slowest (2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280).

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: Stress-NG (Test: IO_uring) at 116.57x, OpenSCAD (Render: Projector Mount Swivel) at 8.434x, OpenSSL (Algorithm: SHA256) at 6.326x, ASKAP (Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding) at 3.951x, ASKAP (Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding) at 3.775x, OpenSCAD (Render: Retro Car) at 3.09x, Stress-NG (Test: Vector Math) at 2.654x, PyHPC Benchmarks (Device: CPU - Backend: Numpy - Project Size: 4194304 - Benchmark: Equation of State) at 2.588x, Stress-NG (Test: Vector Math) at 2.449x, LZ4 Compression (Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed) at 2.283x.

332 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread