2023-01-16-2136 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 testing with a Supermicro X9DR3-F v0123456789 (3.4 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450 on Arch Linux via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2301215-NE-MERGE967543&gru&sro .
2023-01-16-2136 Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Compiler File-System Screen Resolution 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #23 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #28 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #29 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #30 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #31 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #33 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #34 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #35 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #36 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #37 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #38 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #39 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #40 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #42 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #43 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #44 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #45 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #46 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #47 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #48 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #51 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #52 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #53 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #54 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #55 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #56 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #58 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #59 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #60 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #61 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #62 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #63 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #65 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #66 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #67 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #68 2023-01-18 00:49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #69 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #70 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #71 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #72 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #73 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #74 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #75 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #76 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #77 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #78 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #79 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #80 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #81 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #82 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #83 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #84 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #85 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #86 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #87 2023-01-18 08:41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #88 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #89 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #90 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #91 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #92 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #93 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #94 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #95 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #96 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #97 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #98 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #99 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #100 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #101 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #102 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #103 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #104 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #105 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #106 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #107 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #108 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #109 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #110 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #111 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #112 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #113 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #114 2023-01-18 21:59 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #115 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #116 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #117 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #118 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #119 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #120 2023-01-19 04:50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #121 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #122 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #123 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #124 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 @ 3.60GHz (20 Cores / 40 Threads) Supermicro X9DR3-F v0123456789 (3.4 BIOS) Intel Xeon E7 v2/Xeon 128GB 120GB KINGSTON SA400S3 Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450 2 x Intel I350 Arch Linux 6.1.6-arch1-1 (x86_64) GCC 12.2.0 xfs 1280x1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: always Compiler Details - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #2, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #3, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #4, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #6, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #7, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #8, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #10, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #11, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #12, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #13, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #14, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #15, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #16, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #17, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #18, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #19, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #20, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #21, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #22, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #23, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #24, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #25, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #26, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #27, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #28, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #29, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #30, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #31, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #32, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #33, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #34, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #35, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #36, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #38, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #39, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #40, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #41, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #42, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #43, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #45, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #48, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #50, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #51, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #53, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #54, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #55, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #56, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #57, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #58, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #59, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #60, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #62, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #63, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #64, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #65, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #66, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #67, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #68, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #69, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #73, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #74, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #75, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #76, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #77, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #78, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #79, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #80, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #81, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #83, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #85, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #86, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #87, 2023-01-18 08:41, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #88, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #89, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #90, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #91, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #92, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #93, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #94, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #95, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #96, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #98, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #99, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #100, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #102, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #104, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #105, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #107, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #110, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #111, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #112, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #114, 2023-01-18 21:59, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #115, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #116, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #117, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #118, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #119, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #120, 2023-01-19 04:50, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #122, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #124: --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-werror --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet=auto --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-default-ssp --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,c++,ada,fortran,go,lto,objc,obj-c++,d --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-link-serialization=1 --enable-lto --enable-multilib --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-linker-hash-style=gnu Processor Details - Scaling Governor: intel_cpufreq performance - CPU Microcode: 0x42e Security Details - itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of VMX disabled + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT vulnerable + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + mmio_stale_data: Unknown: No mitigations + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Retpolines IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected Java Details - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #9, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #47, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #70, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #71, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #72: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.17+1) Python Details - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #17, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #18, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #21, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #22, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #24, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #33, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #46, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #101, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #111, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #118, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #122: Python 3.10.9
2023-01-16-2136 minibude: OpenMP - BM1 minibude: OpenMP - BM2 openssl: SHA256 minife: Small amg: dav1d: Summer Nature 1080p dav1d: Summer Nature 4K dav1d: Chimera 1080p dav1d: Chimera 1080p 10-bit libgav1: Summer Nature 1080p libgav1: Summer Nature 4K libgav1: Chimera 1080p libgav1: Chimera 1080p 10-bit embree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragon embree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragon Obj embree: Pathtracer - Crown embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon Obj embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Crown kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Slow kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Medium kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Very Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Super Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Ultra Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Slow kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Medium kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Very Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Super Fast kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Ultra Fast rav1e: 10 rav1e: 6 rav1e: 5 rav1e: 1 minibude: OpenMP - BM1 minibude: OpenMP - BM2 hpcg: mt-dgemm: Sustained Floating-Point Rate arrayfire: BLAS CPU mpcbench: Multi-Precision Benchmark gmpbench: Total Time oidn: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 oidn: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 oidn: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 chia-vdf: Square Plain C++ chia-vdf: Square Assembly Optimized openvkl: vklBenchmark Scalar openvkl: vklBenchmark ISPC ospray: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time ospray: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time ospray: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time ospray: particle_volume/ao/real_time ospray: particle_volume/scivis/real_time ospray: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time graphics-magick: HWB Color Space graphics-magick: Noise-Gaussian graphics-magick: Enhanced graphics-magick: Resizing graphics-magick: Rotate graphics-magick: Sharpen graphics-magick: Swirl coremark: CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second fhourstones: Complex Connect-4 Solving luxcorerender: DLSC - CPU luxcorerender: Rainbow Colors and Prism - CPU luxcorerender: LuxCore Benchmark - CPU luxcorerender: Orange Juice - CPU luxcorerender: Danish Mood - CPU blosc: blosclz shuffle blosc: blosclz bitshuffle cachebench: Read cachebench: Write cachebench: Read / Modify / Write compress-lz4: 1 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 1 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 3 - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 8 - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 8 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19 - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 19 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - All Reads intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like lzbench: Zstd 1 - Compression lzbench: Zstd 1 - Decompression lzbench: Zstd 8 - Compression lzbench: Zstd 8 - Decompression lzbench: Brotli 0 - Compression lzbench: Brotli 0 - Decompression lzbench: Brotli 2 - Compression lzbench: Brotli 2 - Decompression lzbench: Libdeflate 1 - Compression lzbench: Libdeflate 1 - Decompression lzbench: XZ 0 - Compression lzbench: XZ 0 - Decompression lzbench: Crush 0 - Compression lzbench: Crush 0 - Decompression ramspeed: Copy - Integer ramspeed: Copy - Floating Point ramspeed: Scale - Integer ramspeed: Scale - Floating Point ramspeed: Add - Integer ramspeed: Add - Floating Point ramspeed: Triad - Integer ramspeed: Triad - Floating Point ramspeed: Average - Integer ramspeed: Average - Floating Point nettle: sha512 nettle: poly1305-aes nettle: aes256 nettle: chacha ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 128 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 256 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 512 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 1024 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 2048 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 4096 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 128 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 256 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 512 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 1024 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 2048 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 4096 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 128 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 256 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 512 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 1024 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 2048 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 4096 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 128 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 256 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 512 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 1024 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 2048 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 4096 ffte: N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 32 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 64 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 128 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 256 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 512 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 1024 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 2048 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 4096 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 32 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 64 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 128 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 256 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 512 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 1024 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 2048 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 4096 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 32 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 64 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 128 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 256 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 512 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 1024 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 2048 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 4096 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 32 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 64 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 128 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 256 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 512 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 1024 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 2048 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 4096 himeno: Poisson Pressure Solver java-scimark2: Composite java-scimark2: Fast Fourier Transform java-scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation java-scimark2: Monte Carlo java-scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiply java-scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization luajit: Composite luajit: Fast Fourier Transform luajit: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation luajit: Monte Carlo luajit: Sparse Matrix Multiply luajit: Dense LU Matrix Factorization quantlib: botan: AES-256 botan: AES-256 - Decrypt botan: Blowfish botan: Blowfish - Decrypt botan: CAST-256 botan: CAST-256 - Decrypt botan: KASUMI botan: KASUMI - Decrypt botan: Twofish botan: Twofish - Decrypt botan: ChaCha20Poly1305 botan: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt mbw: Memory Copy - 128 MiB mbw: Memory Copy - 512 MiB mbw: Memory Copy - 1024 MiB mbw: Memory Copy - 4096 MiB mbw: Memory Copy - 8192 MiB mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 128 MiB mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 512 MiB mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 1024 MiB mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 4096 MiB mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 8192 MiB cryptopp: Unkeyed Algorithms cryptopp: Keyed Algorithms cryptopp: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms cryptopp: All Algorithms compress-7zip: Compression Rating compress-7zip: Decompression Rating jpegxl: JPEG - 80 jpegxl: JPEG - 90 jpegxl: JPEG - 100 jpegxl: PNG - 80 jpegxl: PNG - 90 jpegxl: PNG - 100 jpegxl-decode: 1 jpegxl-decode: All libraw: Post-Processing Benchmark etcpak: Single-Threaded - ETC2 etcpak: Single-Threaded - DXT1 etcpak: Multi-Threaded - ETC2 etcpak: Multi-Threaded - DXT1 lczero: Eigen asmfish: 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth lammps: Rhodopsin Protein lammps: 20k Atoms ebizzy: pjsip: OPTIONS, Stateful pjsip: OPTIONS, Stateless pjsip: INVITE liquid-dsp: 1 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 2 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 4 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 8 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 16 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 32 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 40 - 256 - 57 numpy: openssl: RSA4096 clomp: Static OMP Speedup npb: BT.C npb: EP.C npb: EP.D npb: FT.C npb: LU.C npb: SP.B npb: SP.C npb: MG.C npb: CG.C openssl: RSA4096 lulesh: blake2: namd: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms pennant: leblancbig pennant: sedovbig arrayfire: Conjugate Gradient CPU mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - f32 mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - u8s8f32 mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - f32 mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - u8s8f32 mkl-dnn: IP Batch 1D - f32 mkl-dnn: IP Batch 1D - u8s8f32 mkl-dnn: IP Batch All - f32 mkl-dnn: IP Batch All - u8s8f32 mkl-dnn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - f32 mkl-dnn: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - f32 onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - f32 - CPU onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - f32 - CPU onednn: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - f32 - CPU onednn: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: IP Shapes 1D - f32 - CPU onednn: IP Shapes 1D - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: IP Shapes 3D - f32 - CPU onednn: IP Shapes 3D - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - f32 - CPU onednn: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - bf16bf16bf16 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - bf16bf16bf16 - CPU openjpeg: NASA Curiosity Panorama M34 ospray-studio: 1 - 1080p - 1 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 1 - 1080p - 16 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 1 - 1080p - 32 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 1 - 4K - 1 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 1 - 4K - 16 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 1 - 4K - 32 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 2 - 1080p - 1 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 2 - 1080p - 16 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 2 - 1080p - 32 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 2 - 4K - 1 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 2 - 4K - 16 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 2 - 4K - 32 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 3 - 1080p - 1 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 3 - 1080p - 16 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 3 - 1080p - 32 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 3 - 4K - 1 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 3 - 4K - 16 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 3 - 4K - 32 - Path Tracer dacapobench: H2 dacapobench: Jython dacapobench: Tradebeans dacapobench: Tradesoap core-latency: Average Latency Between CPU Cores intel-mlc: Idle Latency multichase: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride multichase: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride multichase: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride multichase: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads multichase: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads aobench: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time avifenc: 0 avifenc: 2 avifenc: 6 avifenc: 6, Lossless avifenc: 10, Lossless bork: File Encryption Time build-apache: Time To Compile build-eigen: Time To Compile build-erlang: Time To Compile build-ffmpeg: Time To Compile build-gdb: Time To Compile build-imagemagick: Time To Compile build-linux-kernel: defconfig build-llvm: Ninja build-llvm: Unix Makefiles build-mplayer: Time To Compile build-nodejs: Time To Compile build-python: Default build-python: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized build-wasmer: Time To Compile build2: Time To Compile bullet: 3000 Fall bullet: 1000 Stack bullet: 136 Ragdolls bullet: 1000 Convex bullet: Prim Trimesh bullet: Convex Trimesh c-ray: Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel cloverleaf: Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics compress-gzip: Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz compress-pbzip2: FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img Compression compress-xz: Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 cp2k: Fayalite-FIST cython-bench: N-Queens deepspeech: CPU encode-flac: WAV To FLAC encode-mp3: WAV To MP3 gcrypt: hackbench: 1 - Process hackbench: 1 - Thread hackbench: 2 - Process hackbench: 2 - Thread hackbench: 4 - Process hackbench: 4 - Thread hackbench: 8 - Process hackbench: 8 - Thread hackbench: 16 - Process hackbench: 16 - Thread hackbench: 32 - Process helsing: 12 digit helsing: 14 digit hmmer: Pfam Database Search incompact3d: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction incompact3d: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction incompact3d: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d m-queens: Time To Solve mafft: Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA mencoder: AVI To LAVC mocassin: Dust 2D tau100.0 mrbayes: Primate Phylogeny Analysis perl-benchmark: Pod2html perl-benchmark: Interpreter polybench-c: 3 Matrix Multiplications polybench-c: Correlation Computation polybench-c: Covariance Computation primesieve: 1e12 primesieve: 1e13 qe: AUSURF112 relion: Basic - CPU qmcpack: simple-H2O pmbench: 1 - 100% Writes pmbench: 1 - 50% pmbench: 1 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 1 - 100% Reads pmbench: 2 - 100% Writes pmbench: 2 - 50% pmbench: 2 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 2 - 100% Reads pmbench: 4 - 100% Writes pmbench: 4 - 50% pmbench: 4 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 4 - 100% Reads pmbench: 8 - 100% Writes pmbench: 8 - 50% pmbench: 8 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 8 - 100% Reads pmbench: 16 - 100% Writes pmbench: 16 - 50% pmbench: 16 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 16 - 100% Reads pmbench: 32 - 100% Writes pmbench: 32 - 50% pmbench: 32 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 32 - 100% Reads pmbench: 40 - 100% Writes pmbench: 40 - 50% pmbench: 40 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 40 - 100% Reads 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #23 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #28 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #29 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #30 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #31 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #33 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #34 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #35 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #36 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #37 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #38 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #39 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #40 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #42 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #43 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #44 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #45 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #46 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #47 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #48 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #51 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #52 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #53 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #54 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #55 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #56 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #58 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #59 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #60 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #61 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #62 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #63 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #65 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #66 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #67 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #68 2023-01-18 00:49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #69 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #70 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #71 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #72 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #73 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #74 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #75 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #76 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #77 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #78 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #79 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #80 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #81 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #82 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #83 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #84 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #85 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #86 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #87 2023-01-18 08:41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #88 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #89 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #90 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #91 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #92 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #93 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #94 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #95 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #96 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #97 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #98 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #99 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #100 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #101 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #102 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #103 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #104 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #105 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #106 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #107 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #108 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #109 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #110 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #111 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #112 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #113 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #114 2023-01-18 21:59 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #115 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #116 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #117 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #118 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #119 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #120 2023-01-19 04:50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #121 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #122 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #123 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #124 13.053 13.515 4390282293 8821.67 487410933 486.22 157.83 332.46 246.13 127.98 38.80 98.76 38.91 18.8100 17.2018 15.9529 20.4129 17.9245 16.5368 8.73 8.87 19.54 25.26 39.70 2.35 2.34 5.05 6.53 10.31 4.340 1.739 1.315 0.289 326.311 337.881 9.47093 6.156392 786.980 6227 3809.2 0.33 0.33 0.16 95200 122300 98 165 2.63233 2.58492 3.37937 4.57608 4.54025 93.1747 885 309 209 1168 586 193 524 548071.494966 12322.4 1.89 7.69 1.46 2.75 1.33 10291.7 5328.4 3047.544938 23550.000207 26799.194125 5265.50 6086.3 36.89 5748.3 35.47 5772.9 2105.5 819.6 2451.7 752.1 2293.9 701.7 2467.3 55.4 2046.4 36.7 2105.8 366 1207 73 1138 371 456 149 528 176 843 33 97 96 427 404.22 2246.07 1381.15 813.26 1598981 1456508 1423173 1400303 1245243 997032 1518852 1495301 1468795 1369849 1205781 969431 894830 873506 871455 819687 736147 634269 1346662 1289164 1219637 1086971 881643 634940 49494.591807589 6185.9 6034.9 5775.4 5499.5 5570.8 5474.0 5269.1 5181.0 6356.4 5451.3 5147.0 4917.5 5011.5 5012.3 3781.8 3657.2 9422.2 13958 17556 18608 19980 20280 19554 18527 20488 19833 16083 14704 15398 15595 11246 9666.4 2767.314239 1731.02 1086.80 1501.77 850.07 1513.21 3703.27 1102.50 407.29 1506.33 414.51 1073.79 2110.58 1597.8 2249.225 2247.137 283.243 287.371 104.169 104.161 74.638 71.118 246.375 242.309 409.972 406.706 269.163351 417.056544 3355.211650 1112.355677 103020 93600 6.09 6.01 0.37 6.27 6.19 0.38 21.49 123.00 26.04 13.396 13.285 296.467 297.076 555 45857969 9.050 9.019 480762 7017 42499 4313 20848000 39569000 76182667 143850000 274363333 427003333 482050000 233.96 2638.4 21.9 10118.43 1005.35 1011.04 6936.26 7972.95 4438.95 4492.17 8770.48 4651.34 174679.4 5469.1930 4.98 1.11357 35.54626 60.12327 16.08 10.5847 95.8687 11.9557 28.6540 4.86872 34.2686 59.5889 286.172 454.520 54.7522 13.6139 24.3524 10.00285 4.00951 11.9317 5.55297 4.97658 4.65906 8.03746 2.23329 2.30625 5.90042 6163.96 6167.95 6260.78 3364.45 3393.93 3351.30 94341 2955 47104 107560 11742 200099 387699 2990 49872 108071 11890 202545 392358 3512 68906 124458 13907 235840 456973 4403 6130 7386 5092 251.162 71.369 6.564 73.703 75.070 81.495 41.723 241.300 127.085 8.938 14.378 8.574 10.380 41.247 159.400 147.843 56.336 109.556 34.702 131.747 641.719 723.494 39.432 643.106 32.353 473.473 80.752 149.245 4.963265 5.896145 3.566150 6.058387 1.199460 1.47690 59.495 76.41 46.190 6.979 22.412 1666.144 31.825 151.59714 36.839 11.308 291.876 3.478 3.413 5.157 5.366 9.959 10.397 18.915 19.559 35.914 35.933 73.734 3.803 367.364 192.963 16.9970862 74.1437988 1365.30962 50.847 14.002 22.133 174 222.308 0.20044505 0.00172632 3.179 2.699 2.603 20.616 235.121 4320 1605.203 55.365 78161.3 71313.5 68893.0 61036.9 70345.1 78336.45 71395.63 69044.54 61700.31 73285.82 70.6 3656.793 3575.777 3547.809 3564.934 3656.539 4770.596 4854.788 4769.068 4701.578 4746.317 0.0714 0.0829 0.1007 0.0454 0.0768 0.0880 0.1069 0.0472 0.0906 0.0976 0.1192 0.0477 0.0928 0.1005 0.1288 0.0504 0.0960 0.1070 0.1291 0.0525 0.1068 0.1333 0.1426 0.0655 0.1136 0.1391 0.1498 0.0658 17807.62 17769.94 18843.10 17914.34 20084.53 18836.90 20323.93 18388.89 19264.94 18332.59 OpenBenchmarking.org
Java Graphics Basic Acceptance Test OpenBenchmarking.org Java Graphics Basic Acceptance Test 2.0 FAIL 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1
CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #23 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #28 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #29 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #30 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #31 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #33 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #34 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #35 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #36 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #37 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #38 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #39 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #40 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #42 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #43 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #44 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #45 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #46 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #47 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #48 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #51 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #52 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #53 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #54 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #55 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #56 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #9 2023-01-18 00:49 2023-01-18 08:41 2023-01-18 21:59 2023-01-19 04:50 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 27 / Avg: 36.4 / Max: 50 Min: 27 / Avg: 29.41 / Max: 33 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.12 / Max: 29 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.5 / Max: 31 Min: 26 / Avg: 33.59 / Max: 43 Min: 26 / Avg: 28.44 / Max: 35 Min: 25 / Avg: 28.08 / Max: 36 Min: 27 / Avg: 34.56 / Max: 41 Min: 27 / Avg: 37.16 / Max: 49 Min: 23 / Avg: 27 / Max: 44 Min: 23 / Avg: 27.13 / Max: 32 Min: 29 / Avg: 36.57 / Max: 48 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.5 / Max: 28 Min: 28 / Avg: 36.58 / Max: 54 Min: 35 / Avg: 41.3 / Max: 52 Min: 35 / Avg: 47.5 / Max: 58 Min: 34 / Avg: 53.85 / Max: 59 Min: 24 / Avg: 28.42 / Max: 41 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.26 / Max: 26 Min: 24 / Avg: 28.88 / Max: 43 Min: 24 / Avg: 26.64 / Max: 38 Min: 26 / Avg: 44.49 / Max: 53 Min: 33 / Avg: 38.77 / Max: 55 Min: 31 / Avg: 52.36 / Max: 55 Min: 34 / Avg: 50.64 / Max: 56 Min: 30 / Avg: 35.04 / Max: 41 Min: 26 / Avg: 34.51 / Max: 47 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.94 / Max: 29 Min: 27 / Avg: 36.96 / Max: 52 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.93 / Max: 32 Min: 23 / Avg: 46.08 / Max: 54 Min: 30 / Avg: 38.01 / Max: 53 Min: 28 / Avg: 31.1 / Max: 34 Min: 30 / Avg: 34.48 / Max: 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 28.21 / Max: 31 Min: 28 / Avg: 47.11 / Max: 54 Min: 27 / Avg: 44.71 / Max: 56 Min: 30 / Avg: 41.38 / Max: 55 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.47 / Max: 28 Min: 28 / Avg: 42.17 / Max: 53 Min: 34 / Avg: 43.12 / Max: 55 Min: 35 / Avg: 49.65 / Max: 59 Min: 34 / Avg: 46.53 / Max: 58 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.1 / Max: 39 Min: 26 / Avg: 28.21 / Max: 30 Min: 33 / Avg: 47.48 / Max: 54 Min: 26 / Avg: 30.81 / Max: 39 Min: 27 / Avg: 31.94 / Max: 41 Min: 29 / Avg: 32 / Max: 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 44.73 / Max: 55 Min: 33 / Avg: 33.75 / Max: 34 Min: 27 / Avg: 34.02 / Max: 42 Min: 30 / Avg: 49.64 / Max: 57 Min: 37 / Avg: 48.05 / Max: 56 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.69 / Max: 44 Min: 30 / Avg: 33 / Max: 35 Min: 36 / Avg: 48.07 / Max: 54 Min: 24 / Avg: 27.35 / Max: 33 Min: 25 / Avg: 34.97 / Max: 51 Min: 29 / Avg: 33.02 / Max: 36
System Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius System Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #23 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #28 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #29 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #30 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #31 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #33 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #34 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #35 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #36 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #37 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #38 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #39 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #40 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #42 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #43 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #44 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #45 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #46 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #47 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #48 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #51 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #52 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #53 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #54 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #55 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #56 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #9 2023-01-18 00:49 2023-01-18 08:41 2023-01-18 21:59 2023-01-19 04:50 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 35 / Avg: 44.77 / Max: 56 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.15 / Max: 44 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.9 / Max: 39 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.17 / Max: 41 Min: 37 / Avg: 42.6 / Max: 51 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.94 / Max: 47 Min: 35 / Avg: 38 / Max: 44 Min: 36 / Avg: 43 / Max: 48 Min: 36 / Avg: 43.86 / Max: 53 Min: 33 / Avg: 36.72 / Max: 51 Min: 33 / Avg: 38.19 / Max: 47 Min: 38 / Avg: 44.17 / Max: 54 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.42 / Max: 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 45.59 / Max: 59 Min: 42 / Avg: 47.65 / Max: 57 Min: 43 / Avg: 53.38 / Max: 63 Min: 44 / Avg: 59.16 / Max: 63 Min: 34 / Avg: 38.05 / Max: 50 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.57 / Max: 38 Min: 33 / Avg: 38.6 / Max: 46 Min: 33 / Avg: 36.43 / Max: 47 Min: 35 / Avg: 51.09 / Max: 58 Min: 41 / Avg: 47.3 / Max: 59 Min: 41 / Avg: 57.8 / Max: 60 Min: 42 / Avg: 56.19 / Max: 61 Min: 39 / Avg: 43.46 / Max: 48 Min: 36 / Avg: 42.68 / Max: 54 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.33 / Max: 39 Min: 36 / Avg: 45.21 / Max: 56 Min: 35 / Avg: 38.22 / Max: 41 Min: 36 / Avg: 53.42 / Max: 60 Min: 39 / Avg: 44.77 / Max: 57 Min: 39 / Avg: 40.73 / Max: 44 Min: 39 / Avg: 42.76 / Max: 48 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.05 / Max: 42 Min: 36 / Avg: 54.68 / Max: 58 Min: 37 / Avg: 51.55 / Max: 60 Min: 40 / Avg: 48.31 / Max: 60 Min: 37 / Avg: 38 / Max: 39 Min: 39 / Avg: 48.92 / Max: 59 Min: 44 / Avg: 50.39 / Max: 59 Min: 45 / Avg: 55.95 / Max: 63 Min: 46 / Avg: 54.72 / Max: 63 Min: 42 / Avg: 44.32 / Max: 49 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.24 / Max: 41 Min: 42 / Avg: 53.63 / Max: 57 Min: 37 / Avg: 40.05 / Max: 47 Min: 37 / Avg: 40.79 / Max: 49 Min: 39 / Avg: 42.95 / Max: 51 Min: 39 / Avg: 52.14 / Max: 60 Min: 41 / Avg: 41.33 / Max: 42 Min: 38 / Avg: 43.76 / Max: 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 55.52 / Max: 62 Min: 46 / Avg: 54.89 / Max: 60 Min: 42 / Avg: 46.7 / Max: 52 Min: 40 / Avg: 42.25 / Max: 46 Min: 45 / Avg: 54.42 / Max: 58 Min: 34 / Avg: 38.92 / Max: 42 Min: 35 / Avg: 44.46 / Max: 57 Min: 38 / Avg: 44.46 / Max: 49
miniBUDE Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 OpenBenchmarking.org Billion Interactions/s, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.15, N = 4 13.05 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -Ofast -ffast-math -fopenmp -march=native -lm
miniBUDE Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 OpenBenchmarking.org Billion Interactions/s, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 13.52 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -Ofast -ffast-math -fopenmp -march=native -lm
OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA256 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 900M 1800M 2700M 3600M 4500M SE +/- 19658665.06, N = 3 4390282293 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
miniFE Problem Size: Small OpenBenchmarking.org CG Mflops, More Is Better miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Small 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 88.37, N = 3 8821.67 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 100M 200M 300M 400M 500M SE +/- 213821.91, N = 3 487410933 1. (CC) gcc options: -lparcsr_ls -lparcsr_mv -lseq_mv -lIJ_mv -lkrylov -lHYPRE_utilities -lm -fopenmp -lmpi
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.31, N = 6 486.22 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 157.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 332.46 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 246.13 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
libgav1 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 127.98 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lrt
libgav1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 38.80 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lrt
libgav1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 98.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lrt
libgav1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 38.91 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lrt
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 18.81 MIN: 18.63 / MAX: 19.19
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 17.20 MIN: 17.1 / MAX: 17.44
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 15.95 MIN: 15.69 / MAX: 16.28
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 20.41 MIN: 20.15 / MAX: 20.77
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 17.92 MIN: 17.77 / MAX: 18.23
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.54 MIN: 16.35 / MAX: 16.84
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 8.73 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 8.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 19.54 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 25.26 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 39.70 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.5288 1.0576 1.5864 2.1152 2.644 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 2.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.5265 1.053 1.5795 2.106 2.6325 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 2.34 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.1363 2.2726 3.4089 4.5452 5.6815 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 5.05 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 6.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 10.31 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
rav1e Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 Speed: 10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.9765 1.953 2.9295 3.906 4.8825 SE +/- 0.043, N = 6 4.340
rav1e Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 Speed: 6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.3913 0.7826 1.1739 1.5652 1.9565 SE +/- 0.017, N = 3 1.739
rav1e Speed: 5 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 Speed: 5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.2959 0.5918 0.8877 1.1836 1.4795 SE +/- 0.007, N = 3 1.315
rav1e Speed: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 Speed: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.065 0.13 0.195 0.26 0.325 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.289
miniBUDE Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 OpenBenchmarking.org GFInst/s, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 3.66, N = 4 326.31 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -Ofast -ffast-math -fopenmp -march=native -lm
miniBUDE Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 OpenBenchmarking.org GFInst/s, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 337.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -Ofast -ffast-math -fopenmp -march=native -lm
High Performance Conjugate Gradient OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00369, N = 3 9.47093 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
ACES DGEMM Sustained Floating-Point Rate OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.082293, N = 15 6.156392 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
ArrayFire Test: BLAS CPU OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better ArrayFire 3.7 Test: BLAS CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 3.32, N = 4 786.98 1. (CXX) g++ options: -rdynamic
GNU MPC Multi-Precision Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Global Score, More Is Better GNU MPC 1.1.0 Multi-Precision Benchmark 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 41.77, N = 3 6227 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -O2 -pedantic -fomit-frame-pointer -m64 -mtune=sandybridge -march=sandybridge -MT -MD -MP -MF
GNU GMP GMPbench Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org GMPbench Score, More Is Better GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 Total Time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3809.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -lm
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.0743 0.1486 0.2229 0.2972 0.3715 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.33
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.0743 0.1486 0.2229 0.2972 0.3715 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.33
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.036 0.072 0.108 0.144 0.18 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.16
Chia Blockchain VDF Test: Square Plain C++ OpenBenchmarking.org IPS, More Is Better Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 Test: Square Plain C++ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 611.01, N = 3 95200 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -no-pie -lgmpxx -lgmp -lboost_system -pthread
Chia Blockchain VDF Test: Square Assembly Optimized OpenBenchmarking.org IPS, More Is Better Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 Test: Square Assembly Optimized 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 503.32, N = 3 122300 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -no-pie -lgmpxx -lgmp -lboost_system -pthread
OpenVKL Benchmark: vklBenchmark Scalar OpenBenchmarking.org Items / Sec, More Is Better OpenVKL 1.3.1 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Scalar 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 98 MIN: 10 / MAX: 1646
OpenVKL Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC OpenBenchmarking.org Items / Sec, More Is Better OpenVKL 1.3.1 Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.73, N = 3 165 MIN: 18 / MAX: 1832
OSPRay Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.5923 1.1846 1.7769 2.3692 2.9615 SE +/- 0.00522, N = 3 2.63233
OSPRay Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.5816 1.1632 1.7448 2.3264 2.908 SE +/- 0.00594, N = 3 2.58492
OSPRay Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.7604 1.5208 2.2812 3.0416 3.802 SE +/- 0.00024, N = 3 3.37937
OSPRay Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.0296 2.0592 3.0888 4.1184 5.148 SE +/- 0.01482, N = 3 4.57608
OSPRay Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.0216 2.0432 3.0648 4.0864 5.108 SE +/- 0.01469, N = 3 4.54025
OSPRay Benchmark: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 93.17
GraphicsMagick Operation: HWB Color Space OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: HWB Color Space 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 10.82, N = 3 885 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -llcms2 -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lzstd -lm -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Noise-Gaussian OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Noise-Gaussian 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 2.52, N = 3 309 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -llcms2 -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lzstd -lm -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Enhanced OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Enhanced 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 209 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -llcms2 -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lzstd -lm -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Resizing OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Resizing 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 3.00, N = 3 1168 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -llcms2 -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lzstd -lm -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Rotate OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Rotate 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 5.36, N = 3 586 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -llcms2 -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lzstd -lm -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Sharpen OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Sharpen 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 193 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -llcms2 -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lzstd -lm -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Swirl OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Swirl 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 524 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -llcms2 -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lzstd -lm -lpthread
Coremark CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 563.63, N = 3 548071.49 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt
Fhourstones Complex Connect-4 Solving OpenBenchmarking.org Kpos / sec, More Is Better Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 13.68, N = 3 12322.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LuxCoreRender Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.4253 0.8506 1.2759 1.7012 2.1265 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 1.89 MIN: 1.82 / MAX: 1.94
LuxCoreRender Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 7.69 MIN: 7.62 / MAX: 7.79
LuxCoreRender Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.3285 0.657 0.9855 1.314 1.6425 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 1.46 MIN: 0.4 / MAX: 1.88
LuxCoreRender Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.6188 1.2376 1.8564 2.4752 3.094 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 2.75 MIN: 2.7 / MAX: 2.78
LuxCoreRender Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.2993 0.5986 0.8979 1.1972 1.4965 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.33 MIN: 0.36 / MAX: 1.69
C-Blosc Test: blosclz shuffle OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz shuffle 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 19.36, N = 3 10291.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -lrt -lm
C-Blosc Test: blosclz bitshuffle OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz bitshuffle 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 28.11, N = 3 5328.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -lrt -lm
CacheBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Read 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 3047.54 MIN: 3045.06 / MAX: 3049.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -lrt
CacheBench Test: Write OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 23550.00 MIN: 17209.85 / MAX: 26942.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -lrt
CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 26799.19 MIN: 25281.62 / MAX: 27415.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -lrt
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 9.30, N = 3 5265.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 6.64, N = 3 6086.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.30, N = 9 36.89 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 11.20, N = 9 5748.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 35.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 15.34, N = 3 5772.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 24.47, N = 3 2105.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 9.44, N = 3 819.6 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 3.40, N = 3 2451.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 13.25, N = 12 752.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 4.89, N = 12 2293.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 1.91, N = 3 701.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 2467.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.48, N = 15 55.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 3.27, N = 15 2046.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 36.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 2.06, N = 3 2105.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads 2023-01-18 00:49 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 10.60, N = 3 78161.3
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes 2023-01-18 00:49 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 18.27, N = 3 71313.5
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes 2023-01-18 00:49 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 209.73, N = 3 68893.0
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes 2023-01-18 00:49 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 155.70, N = 3 61036.9
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like 2023-01-18 00:49 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 75.75, N = 3 70345.1
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads 2023-01-18 00:49 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 13.68, N = 3 78336.45
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes 2023-01-18 00:49 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 17.12, N = 3 71395.63
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes 2023-01-18 00:49 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 129.52, N = 3 69044.54
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes 2023-01-18 00:49 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 85.52, N = 3 61700.31
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like 2023-01-18 00:49 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K SE +/- 55.21, N = 3 73285.82
lzbench Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 366 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 1207 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 1138 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 371 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 456 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 149 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 528 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 176 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 843 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 33 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 97 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 96 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 427 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
RAMspeed SMP Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 94.73, N = 3 17807.62 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 14.84, N = 3 17769.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 133.19, N = 3 18843.10 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 95.27, N = 3 17914.34 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 43.40, N = 3 20084.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 47.50, N = 3 18836.90 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 15.47, N = 3 20323.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 46.07, N = 3 18388.89 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 57.61, N = 3 19264.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 25.93, N = 3 18332.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
Nettle Test: sha512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.8 Test: sha512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.66, N = 10 404.22 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lgmp -lm -lcrypto
Nettle Test: poly1305-aes OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.8 Test: poly1305-aes 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 7.93, N = 15 2246.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lgmp -lm -lcrypto
Nettle Test: aes256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.8 Test: aes256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 4.33, N = 8 1381.15 MIN: 1142.52 / MAX: 1889.75 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lgmp -lm -lcrypto
Nettle Test: chacha OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.8 Test: chacha 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.65, N = 12 813.26 MIN: 395.66 / MAX: 2267.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lgmp -lm -lcrypto
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 14659.06, N = 15 1598981
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 24143.03, N = 15 1456508
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 22921.16, N = 15 1423173
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 13284.05, N = 15 1400303
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 10954.98, N = 15 1245243
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 23765.65, N = 15 997032
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 12657.69, N = 15 1518852
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 12950.77, N = 7 1495301
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 11867.32, N = 15 1468795
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 18154.53, N = 15 1369849
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 21794.83, N = 15 1205781
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 24976.61, N = 15 969431
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 7051.60, N = 9 894830
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 3778.56, N = 5 873506
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 6974.86, N = 5 871455
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1794.80, N = 5 819687
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 3173.20, N = 4 736147
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 2000.84, N = 4 634269
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 4782.47, N = 6 1346662
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 3026.31, N = 6 1289164
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 1461.37, N = 6 1219637
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1639.52, N = 5 1086971
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 2327.69, N = 5 881643
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 745.03, N = 4 634940
FFTE N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 166.60, N = 10 49494.59 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fopenmp
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 4.80, N = 9 6185.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 30.38, N = 11 6034.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 4.28, N = 10 5775.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 2.06, N = 9 5499.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 5.65, N = 8 5570.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 7.32, N = 8 5474.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 7.91, N = 8 5269.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 7.55, N = 7 5181.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 19.91, N = 9 6356.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 9.97, N = 10 5451.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 16.94, N = 9 5147.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 7.18, N = 8 4917.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 5.44, N = 7 5011.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 7.82, N = 4 5012.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 2.52, N = 3 3781.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 2.80, N = 3 3657.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 61.32, N = 15 9422.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 115.40, N = 9 13958 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 63.56, N = 9 17556 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 132.59, N = 15 18608 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 42.80, N = 8 19980 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 70.19, N = 9 20280 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 53.66, N = 8 19554 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 54.10, N = 7 18527 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 56.67, N = 11 20488 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 65.29, N = 10 19833 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 83.33, N = 8 16083 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 63.84, N = 8 14704 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 96.87, N = 7 15398 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 35.20, N = 3 15595 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 133.08, N = 3 11246 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 11.19, N = 3 9666.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 10.99, N = 3 2767.31 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Java SciMark Computational Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 5.50, N = 4 1731.02
Java SciMark Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 3.91, N = 4 1086.80
Java SciMark Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.15, N = 4 1501.77
Java SciMark Computational Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.21, N = 4 850.07
Java SciMark Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.76, N = 4 1513.21
Java SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 28.69, N = 4 3703.27
LuaJIT Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.49, N = 3 1102.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.23, N = 3 407.29 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 1.74, N = 3 1506.33 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.22, N = 3 414.51 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.28, N = 3 1073.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 6.91, N = 3 2110.58 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
QuantLib OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better QuantLib 1.21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 16.57, N = 3 1597.8 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic
Botan Test: AES-256 OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 11.55, N = 3 2249.23 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: AES-256 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 10.67, N = 3 2247.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 283.24 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Blowfish - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 287.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: CAST-256 OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.14, N = 3 104.17 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 104.16 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: KASUMI OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 74.64 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: KASUMI - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 71.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Twofish OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 246.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Twofish - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 242.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 409.97 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 406.71 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 28.05, N = 10 3656.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 25.31, N = 15 3575.78 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 43.57, N = 3 3547.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 48.37, N = 3 3564.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 37.12, N = 3 3656.54 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 31.62, N = 10 4770.60 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 33.73, N = 15 4854.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 51.63, N = 5 4769.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 49.68, N = 5 4701.58 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 15.67, N = 3 4746.32 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
Crypto++ Test: Unkeyed Algorithms OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/second, More Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 269.16 1. (CXX) g++ options: -g2 -O3 -fPIC -pthread -pipe
Crypto++ Test: Keyed Algorithms OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/second, More Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Keyed Algorithms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 417.06 1. (CXX) g++ options: -g2 -O3 -fPIC -pthread -pipe
Crypto++ Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/second, More Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 2.65, N = 3 3355.21 1. (CXX) g++ options: -g2 -O3 -fPIC -pthread -pipe
Crypto++ Test: All Algorithms OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/second, More Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 Test: All Algorithms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 1112.36 1. (CXX) g++ options: -g2 -O3 -fPIC -pthread -pipe
7-Zip Compression Test: Compression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 271.94, N = 3 103020 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
7-Zip Compression Test: Decompression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 236.55, N = 3 93600 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
JPEG XL libjxl Input: JPEG - Quality: 80 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: JPEG - Quality: 80 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 6.09 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fno-rtti -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -fPIE -pie -lm -latomic
JPEG XL libjxl Input: JPEG - Quality: 90 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: JPEG - Quality: 90 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 6.01 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fno-rtti -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -fPIE -pie -lm -latomic
JPEG XL libjxl Input: JPEG - Quality: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: JPEG - Quality: 100 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.0833 0.1666 0.2499 0.3332 0.4165 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 0.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fno-rtti -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -fPIE -pie -lm -latomic
JPEG XL libjxl Input: PNG - Quality: 80 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: PNG - Quality: 80 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 6.27 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fno-rtti -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -fPIE -pie -lm -latomic
JPEG XL libjxl Input: PNG - Quality: 90 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: PNG - Quality: 90 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 6.19 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fno-rtti -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -fPIE -pie -lm -latomic
JPEG XL libjxl Input: PNG - Quality: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: PNG - Quality: 100 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.0855 0.171 0.2565 0.342 0.4275 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 0.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fno-rtti -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -fPIE -pie -lm -latomic
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Threads: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 CPU Threads: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 21.49
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Threads: All OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 CPU Threads: All 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.39, N = 3 123.00
LibRaw Post-Processing Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Mpix/sec, More Is Better LibRaw 0.20 Post-Processing Benchmark 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 26.04 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -fopenmp -ljpeg -lm
Etcpak Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 13.40 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 13.29 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 296.47 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 297.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: Eigen 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 5.30, N = 9 555 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -pthread
asmFish 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes/second, More Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10M 20M 30M 40M 50M SE +/- 339347.10, N = 12 45857969
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: Rhodopsin Protein OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: Rhodopsin Protein 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.194, N = 15 9.050 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lm -ldl
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: 20k Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: 20k Atoms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.014, N = 3 9.019 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lm -ldl
ebizzy OpenBenchmarking.org Records/s, More Is Better ebizzy 0.3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 5220.62, N = 3 480762 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lpthread -O3 -march=native
PJSIP Method: OPTIONS, Stateful OpenBenchmarking.org Responses Per Second, More Is Better PJSIP 2.11 Method: OPTIONS, Stateful 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 61.19, N = 3 7017 1. (CC) gcc options: -lSDL2 -lv4l2 -lvpx -lstdc++ -lopus -lssl -lcrypto -luuid -lm -lrt -lpthread -lasound -lopencore-amrnb -lopencore-amrwb -O2
PJSIP Method: OPTIONS, Stateless OpenBenchmarking.org Responses Per Second, More Is Better PJSIP 2.11 Method: OPTIONS, Stateless 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 342.42, N = 3 42499 1. (CC) gcc options: -lSDL2 -lv4l2 -lvpx -lstdc++ -lopus -lssl -lcrypto -luuid -lm -lrt -lpthread -lasound -lopencore-amrnb -lopencore-amrwb -O2
PJSIP Method: INVITE OpenBenchmarking.org Responses Per Second, More Is Better PJSIP 2.11 Method: INVITE 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 4313 1. (CC) gcc options: -lSDL2 -lv4l2 -lvpx -lstdc++ -lopus -lssl -lcrypto -luuid -lm -lrt -lpthread -lasound -lopencore-amrnb -lopencore-amrwb -O2
Liquid-DSP Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4M 8M 12M 16M 20M SE +/- 41186.57, N = 3 20848000 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8M 16M 24M 32M 40M SE +/- 317512.73, N = 3 39569000 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 16M 32M 48M 64M 80M SE +/- 298123.20, N = 3 76182667 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30M 60M 90M 120M 150M SE +/- 272213.15, N = 3 143850000 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60M 120M 180M 240M 300M SE +/- 726918.92, N = 3 274363333 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 32 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 32 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90M 180M 270M 360M 450M SE +/- 1685084.90, N = 3 427003333 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 40 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 40 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 100M 200M 300M 400M 500M SE +/- 286763.55, N = 3 482050000 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Numpy Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Numpy Benchmark 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 233.96
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org sign/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 0.74, N = 3 2638.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
CLOMP Static OMP Speedup OpenBenchmarking.org Speedup, More Is Better CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.17, N = 15 21.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -lm
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: BT.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 16.53, N = 3 10118.43 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.44, N = 5 1005.35 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.D OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.83, N = 3 1011.04 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: FT.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 15.72, N = 3 6936.26 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: LU.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 12.71, N = 3 7972.95 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: SP.B OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 4.57, N = 3 4438.95 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: SP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 3.50, N = 3 4492.17 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: MG.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 10.35, N = 3 8770.48 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: CG.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 43.30, N = 15 4651.34 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 89.14, N = 3 174679.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
LULESH OpenBenchmarking.org z/s, More Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 20.06, N = 5 5469.19 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp -lm -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
AOBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.94 / Max: 27
AOBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.12 / Max: 37
ArrayFire CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ArrayFire 3.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 30 / Avg: 41.2 / Max: 47
ArrayFire System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ArrayFire 3.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 48.9 / Max: 54
ArrayFire CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ArrayFire 3.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 30 / Avg: 36.2 / Max: 43
ArrayFire System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ArrayFire 3.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 43.5 / Max: 50
asmFish CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 29 / Avg: 51.25 / Max: 58
asmFish System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 40 / Avg: 57.88 / Max: 62
libavif avifenc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 35 / Avg: 41.3 / Max: 55
libavif avifenc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 43 / Avg: 50.61 / Max: 59
libavif avifenc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 33 / Avg: 37.18 / Max: 49
libavif avifenc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.94 / Max: 55
libavif avifenc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.57 / Max: 45
libavif avifenc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 43 / Max: 48
BLAKE2 CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better BLAKE2 20170307 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 30.38 / Max: 31
BLAKE2 System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better BLAKE2 20170307 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 39.38 / Max: 41
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 30 / Avg: 33.6 / Max: 37
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 40 / Avg: 41.78 / Max: 46
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 32 / Avg: 35.06 / Max: 40
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 43.47 / Max: 48
Bork File Encrypter CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Bork File Encrypter 1.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 29 / Avg: 34.78 / Max: 41
Bork File Encrypter System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Bork File Encrypter 1.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 40.22 / Max: 42
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29.07 / Max: 30
Botan System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 39.46 / Max: 41
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.77 / Max: 30
Botan System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.38 / Max: 39
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28 / Max: 29
Botan System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.38 / Max: 40
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.08 / Max: 29
Botan System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.31 / Max: 40
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.69 / Max: 28
Botan System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.54 / Max: 39
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.46 / Max: 28
Botan System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.38 / Max: 39
Timed Apache Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 27 / Avg: 30.75 / Max: 36
Timed Apache Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 40.1 / Max: 45
Timed Eigen Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.48 / Max: 29
Timed Eigen Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.76 / Max: 41
Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 28 / Avg: 35.46 / Max: 44
Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 37 / Avg: 42.9 / Max: 51
Timed FFmpeg Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 28 / Avg: 36.18 / Max: 47
Timed FFmpeg Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 46.27 / Max: 52
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 28 / Avg: 35.2 / Max: 47
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 44.07 / Max: 50
Timed ImageMagick Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 28 / Avg: 35 / Max: 43
Timed ImageMagick Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 42.42 / Max: 49
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 30 / Avg: 38.88 / Max: 49
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 38 / Avg: 46.75 / Max: 54
Timed LLVM Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 39 / Avg: 49.02 / Max: 56
Timed LLVM Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 47 / Avg: 56.04 / Max: 60
Timed LLVM Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 37 / Avg: 47.78 / Max: 54
Timed LLVM Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 46 / Avg: 54.49 / Max: 59
Timed MPlayer Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.88 / Max: 43
Timed MPlayer Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 49.43 / Max: 57
Timed Node.js Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 18.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 46.82 / Max: 55
Timed Node.js Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 18.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 45 / Avg: 54.62 / Max: 60
Timed CPython Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.29 / Max: 40
Timed CPython Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 43 / Avg: 47.57 / Max: 52
Timed CPython Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.67 / Max: 44
Timed CPython Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 42 / Avg: 46.68 / Max: 52
Timed Wasmer Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 38.6 / Max: 46
Timed Wasmer Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 47 / Max: 51
Build2 CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 33 / Avg: 40.15 / Max: 49
Build2 System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.13 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 48.38 / Max: 55
Bullet Physics Engine CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 32 / Avg: 34.22 / Max: 35
Bullet Physics Engine System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 41 / Avg: 42.88 / Max: 46
CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.84 / Max: 33
CacheBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 40.45 / Max: 44
CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.94 / Max: 31
CacheBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.82 / Max: 41
CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.47 / Max: 30
CacheBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.25 / Max: 41
Chia Blockchain VDF CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.05 / Max: 29
Chia Blockchain VDF System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.97 / Max: 39
Chia Blockchain VDF CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.17 / Max: 29
Chia Blockchain VDF System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.79 / Max: 39
CLOMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CLOMP 1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 29.53 / Max: 34
CLOMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CLOMP 1.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.9 / Max: 45
Gzip Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Gzip Compression CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.27 / Max: 34
Gzip Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Gzip Compression System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.77 / Max: 43
LZ4 Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.63 / Max: 29
LZ4 Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.88 / Max: 39
LZ4 Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.59 / Max: 31
LZ4 Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.3 / Max: 41
LZ4 Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.17 / Max: 28
LZ4 Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.58 / Max: 39
Parallel BZIP2 Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 27 / Avg: 35.2 / Max: 42
Parallel BZIP2 Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.13 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 40.07 / Max: 42
XZ Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 28 / Avg: 37.94 / Max: 44
XZ Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 46.68 / Max: 50
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 32.06 / Max: 39
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 42.63 / Max: 45
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 31.71 / Max: 38
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.88 / Max: 45
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 28 / Avg: 33.11 / Max: 41
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 41.58 / Max: 47
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.41 / Max: 38
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 42 / Max: 47
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 30 / Avg: 35.16 / Max: 43
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 43.84 / Max: 51
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 30 / Avg: 33.33 / Max: 36
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.25 / Max: 49
Core-Latency CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Core-Latency CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 27 / Avg: 30.55 / Max: 39
Core-Latency System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Core-Latency System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 40.63 / Max: 46
CP2K Molecular Dynamics CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 28 / Avg: 43.04 / Max: 47
CP2K Molecular Dynamics System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 42 / Avg: 50.37 / Max: 55
Crypto++ CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.63 / Max: 35
Crypto++ System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 42.11 / Max: 47
Crypto++ CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.88 / Max: 32
Crypto++ System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.57 / Max: 42
Crypto++ CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.95 / Max: 29
Crypto++ System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.77 / Max: 41
Crypto++ CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.93 / Max: 30
Crypto++ System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.34 / Max: 40
Cython Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.85 / Max: 27
Cython Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.31 / Max: 38
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.89 / Max: 28
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 38.44 / Max: 42
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.44 / Max: 34
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38 / Max: 43
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.89 / Max: 32
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.11 / Max: 40
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 31.6 / Max: 36
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 39 / Max: 44
dav1d CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 27 / Avg: 31.63 / Max: 36
dav1d System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 41.13 / Max: 45
dav1d CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 27 / Avg: 36.57 / Max: 41
dav1d System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 44.25 / Max: 48
dav1d CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 29 / Avg: 34.36 / Max: 38
dav1d System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 43.33 / Max: 46
dav1d CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 29 / Avg: 35.47 / Max: 39
dav1d System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 44 / Max: 46
DeepSpeech CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 28.58 / Max: 37
DeepSpeech System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.55 / Max: 43
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 30 / Avg: 34 / Max: 45
Embree System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 43.3 / Max: 51
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 34 / Avg: 36.09 / Max: 47
Embree System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 43 / Avg: 45.27 / Max: 53
FLAC Audio Encoding CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.35 / Max: 33
FLAC Audio Encoding System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 39.84 / Max: 42
LAME MP3 Encoding CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.13 / Max: 29
LAME MP3 Encoding System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.07 / Max: 39
Etcpak CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.98 / Max: 27
Etcpak System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.74 / Max: 38
Etcpak CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 28.61 / Max: 35
Etcpak System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.34 / Max: 42
Etcpak System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 37 / Avg: 45.14 / Max: 50
Etcpak CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 30 / Avg: 38.43 / Max: 44
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.75 / Max: 29
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.75 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 26.78 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.88 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 26.44 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.63 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.89 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.88 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25 / Max: 26
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 35.63 / Max: 37
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.22 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.11 / Max: 38
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.25 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 34 / Avg: 34.5 / Max: 35
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.75 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 36.5 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.33 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.44 / Max: 38
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.75 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.75 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.56 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.75 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.56 / Max: 26
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.78 / Max: 38
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 25 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 36.56 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 25.44 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 36.56 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 26.81 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.03 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.53 / Max: 29
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.05 / Max: 41
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.5 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.75 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38 / Max: 43
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.44 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.22 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 24.87 / Max: 26
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 39.69 / Max: 41
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 26 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 34 / Avg: 38.44 / Max: 41
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.5 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 37.5 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.88 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.25 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.44 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 38.44 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.75 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 37.38 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.44 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 38 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 26 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.25 / Max: 37
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 27 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.88 / Max: 38
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.13 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 38 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.5 / Max: 29
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.89 / Max: 42
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 26 / Avg: 28.25 / Max: 30
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 39.15 / Max: 43
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 29.56 / Max: 32
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 41.72 / Max: 47
Fhourstones CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Fhourstones 3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 31.38 / Max: 33
Fhourstones System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Fhourstones 3.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 44.5 / Max: 46
Gcrypt Library CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Gcrypt Library 1.9 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.91 / Max: 29
Gcrypt Library System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Gcrypt Library 1.9 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.94 / Max: 40
GNU GMP GMPbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 27 / Avg: 31.35 / Max: 41
GNU GMP GMPbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.32 / Max: 47
GraphicsMagick CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 33.06 / Max: 37
GraphicsMagick System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 37 / Avg: 43.5 / Max: 47
GraphicsMagick CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 30 / Avg: 42.38 / Max: 49
GraphicsMagick System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 43 / Avg: 49.14 / Max: 54
GraphicsMagick CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 31 / Avg: 33.67 / Max: 37
GraphicsMagick System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 40 / Avg: 42.28 / Max: 46
Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 40.25 / Max: 46
Hackbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 43 / Avg: 47.75 / Max: 52
Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 38.5 / Max: 46
Hackbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 43 / Avg: 46 / Max: 51
Helsing CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 39.44 / Max: 50
Helsing System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 43 / Avg: 45.75 / Max: 55
Helsing CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 53.5 / Max: 58
Helsing System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 44 / Avg: 59.08 / Max: 63
Himeno Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 36.28 / Max: 39
Himeno Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 43 / Avg: 44.4 / Max: 47
Timed HMMer Search CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed HMMer Search 3.3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 33 / Avg: 49.22 / Max: 54
Timed HMMer Search System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed HMMer Search 3.3.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 55.31 / Max: 57
High Performance Conjugate Gradient CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 25 / Avg: 44.99 / Max: 49
High Performance Conjugate Gradient System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 35 / Avg: 51.35 / Max: 56
Xcompact3d Incompact3d CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 34 / Avg: 42 / Max: 46
Xcompact3d Incompact3d System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 49.57 / Max: 53
Xcompact3d Incompact3d CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 46.82 / Max: 50
Xcompact3d Incompact3d System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 53.5 / Max: 56
Xcompact3d Incompact3d CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 38 / Avg: 54.27 / Max: 59
Xcompact3d Incompact3d System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 52 / Avg: 59.5 / Max: 63
Intel Memory Latency Checker CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 00:49 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 46 / Max: 51
Intel Memory Latency Checker System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 00:49 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 52 / Avg: 54.5 / Max: 56
Intel Memory Latency Checker CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 00:49 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 50.46 / Max: 54
Intel Memory Latency Checker System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 00:49 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 48 / Avg: 56.12 / Max: 58
Intel Memory Latency Checker CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 00:49 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.78 / Max: 41
Intel Memory Latency Checker System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 00:49 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 45 / Avg: 46.6 / Max: 48
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.67 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 42 / Avg: 44.5 / Max: 50
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 35 / Max: 41
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 41 / Avg: 43.16 / Max: 46
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 33.26 / Max: 35
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 40 / Avg: 41.95 / Max: 45
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.9 / Max: 34
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 40.65 / Max: 43
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.76 / Max: 30
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 38 / Avg: 38.73 / Max: 40
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.12 / Max: 29
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.2 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.84 / Max: 29
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 37.61 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.44 / Max: 28
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.74 / Max: 28
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 36.89 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.3 / Max: 28
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.6 / Max: 38
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27 / Max: 28
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.23 / Max: 38
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27 / Max: 28
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.19 / Max: 38
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 26.81 / Max: 28
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 36.81 / Max: 42
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 26.56 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.11 / Max: 38
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27 / Max: 28
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.44 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.33 / Max: 26
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37 / Max: 38
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.25 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 37 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.89 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.4 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.78 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.67 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.89 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.22 / Max: 38
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.78 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 35.33 / Max: 37
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.5 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 35.38 / Max: 36
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.56 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.33 / Max: 38
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.5 / Max: 38
Java SciMark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.24 / Max: 26
Java SciMark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.59 / Max: 38
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 26 / Avg: 31.47 / Max: 42
JPEG XL libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 40.44 / Max: 46
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 27 / Avg: 30.73 / Max: 41
JPEG XL libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 39.24 / Max: 45
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 24 / Avg: 27.56 / Max: 38
JPEG XL libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 34 / Avg: 37.94 / Max: 46
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 27 / Avg: 32.28 / Max: 42
JPEG XL libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 40.07 / Max: 45
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 28 / Avg: 33.2 / Max: 43
JPEG XL libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 39.2 / Max: 45
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 24 / Avg: 28.23 / Max: 38
JPEG XL libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 33 / Avg: 38.52 / Max: 45
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.83 / Max: 27
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.21 / Max: 37
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 31.25 / Max: 38
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 43.13 / Max: 47
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 26 / Avg: 37.11 / Max: 42
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 45.74 / Max: 49
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 28 / Avg: 38.12 / Max: 42
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 42 / Avg: 47.65 / Max: 51
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 30 / Avg: 39.77 / Max: 45
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 45.92 / Max: 50
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 31 / Avg: 37.4 / Max: 44
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 46.56 / Max: 50
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 39 / Max: 44
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 44.88 / Max: 50
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 31 / Avg: 47.66 / Max: 51
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 53.5 / Max: 57
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 50.17 / Max: 53
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 51 / Avg: 55.63 / Max: 58
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 37 / Avg: 47.3 / Max: 52
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 53.61 / Max: 57
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 48.19 / Max: 51
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 53.29 / Max: 57
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 46.8 / Max: 51
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 45 / Avg: 53.93 / Max: 57
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 36.75 / Max: 45
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 45.33 / Max: 51
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 31 / Avg: 53 / Max: 55
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 46 / Avg: 58.32 / Max: 60
LeelaChessZero CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 34 / Avg: 51.42 / Max: 56
LeelaChessZero System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 43 / Avg: 56.85 / Max: 61
libgav1 CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 36 / Max: 38
libgav1 System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 40 / Avg: 44 / Max: 46
libgav1 CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 31 / Avg: 36.29 / Max: 41
libgav1 System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.26 / Max: 47
libgav1 CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 31 / Avg: 34.83 / Max: 38
libgav1 System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 40 / Avg: 42.77 / Max: 45
libgav1 CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 30 / Avg: 34.55 / Max: 39
libgav1 System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 43.55 / Max: 48
LibRaw CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LibRaw 0.20 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 31.39 / Max: 40
LibRaw System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LibRaw 0.20 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 40.44 / Max: 46
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 27 / Avg: 33 / Max: 38
Liquid-DSP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.22 / Max: 39
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 27 / Avg: 31.56 / Max: 38
Liquid-DSP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 41.89 / Max: 44
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 27 / Avg: 35 / Max: 41
Liquid-DSP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 42.44 / Max: 46
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 27 / Avg: 33.89 / Max: 39
Liquid-DSP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 43.44 / Max: 48
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 36.11 / Max: 40
Liquid-DSP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 45.67 / Max: 50
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 28 / Avg: 42.29 / Max: 47
LuaJIT CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.18 / Max: 29
LuaJIT System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.64 / Max: 39
LULESH CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 25 / Avg: 28.44 / Max: 31
LULESH System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 40.88 / Max: 44
lzbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.6 / Max: 32
lzbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 40.5 / Max: 41
lzbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29.27 / Max: 30
lzbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 39.42 / Max: 41
lzbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.18 / Max: 30
lzbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.64 / Max: 40
lzbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.7 / Max: 28
lzbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 37.91 / Max: 39
lzbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.5 / Max: 28
lzbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 38 / Max: 39
lzbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 26.86 / Max: 28
lzbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.5 / Max: 39
lzbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 26.93 / Max: 28
lzbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.64 / Max: 38
Timed MAFFT Alignment CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 31.56 / Max: 38
Timed MAFFT Alignment System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 39.89 / Max: 43
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.2 / Max: 33
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 40.44 / Max: 41
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.94 / Max: 30
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 39.17 / Max: 42
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.67 / Max: 28
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.83 / Max: 41
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 26.78 / Max: 29
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 34 / Avg: 38.27 / Max: 41
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.69 / Max: 29
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 40.1 / Max: 42
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.25 / Max: 27
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.56 / Max: 40
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.29 / Max: 29
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 34 / Avg: 38.75 / Max: 41
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.71 / Max: 28
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.81 / Max: 41
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.24 / Max: 29
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 34 / Avg: 38.1 / Max: 42
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.62 / Max: 29
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 34 / Avg: 39.62 / Max: 42
Mencoder CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Mencoder 1.3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.7 / Max: 27
Mencoder System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Mencoder 1.3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 36.3 / Max: 38
miniBUDE CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 23 / Avg: 38.13 / Max: 46
miniBUDE System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 48.14 / Max: 53
miniBUDE CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 29 / Avg: 48.77 / Max: 54
miniBUDE System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 39 / Avg: 55.65 / Max: 60
oneDNN MKL-DNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 42.58 / Max: 50
oneDNN MKL-DNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 48.82 / Max: 55
Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2019-03-24 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 30 / Avg: 50.26 / Max: 54
Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2019-03-24 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 40 / Avg: 56.12 / Max: 59
GNU MPC CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GNU MPC 1.1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.68 / Max: 35
GNU MPC System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GNU MPC 1.1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 41.41 / Max: 46
Timed MrBayes Analysis CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 31 / Avg: 51.36 / Max: 55
Timed MrBayes Analysis System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 40 / Avg: 56.84 / Max: 59
ACES DGEMM CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 40.78 / Max: 46
ACES DGEMM System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 44 / Avg: 47.61 / Max: 52
Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 32 / Avg: 33 / Max: 34
Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 41 / Avg: 42 / Max: 44
Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 31.75 / Max: 33
Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 40 / Avg: 40.5 / Max: 41
Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 30.89 / Max: 32
Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 39 / Avg: 39.67 / Max: 40
Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.13 / Max: 32
Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 42 / Avg: 43 / Max: 44
Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29 / Max: 30
Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 39 / Avg: 39.38 / Max: 40
Nettle CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 29.5 / Max: 31
Nettle System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 39.63 / Max: 41
Nettle CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.25 / Max: 29
Nettle System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 38 / Max: 40
Nettle CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.88 / Max: 28
Nettle System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 36.88 / Max: 37
Nettle CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.5 / Max: 28
Nettle System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.13 / Max: 42
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 28 / Avg: 47.53 / Max: 51
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 53.82 / Max: 57
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 43.25 / Max: 48
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 45 / Avg: 51.75 / Max: 55
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 48.19 / Max: 51
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 43 / Avg: 54.19 / Max: 56
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 47 / Max: 51
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 53.42 / Max: 56
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 47.48 / Max: 53
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 45 / Avg: 56.11 / Max: 58
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 48.75 / Max: 52
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 46 / Avg: 55.91 / Max: 58
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 37 / Avg: 47.37 / Max: 54
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 54 / Avg: 56.32 / Max: 58
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 44.63 / Max: 50
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 52.67 / Max: 56
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 46.06 / Max: 51
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 45 / Avg: 53.76 / Max: 56
Numpy Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 26 / Avg: 29.38 / Max: 35
Numpy Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Numpy Benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.85 / Max: 44
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 27 / Avg: 41.97 / Max: 52
Intel Open Image Denoise System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 37 / Avg: 49.83 / Max: 58
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 32 / Avg: 44.81 / Max: 53
Intel Open Image Denoise System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 51.36 / Max: 58
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 33 / Avg: 46.58 / Max: 56
Intel Open Image Denoise System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 42 / Avg: 53.07 / Max: 60
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 40 / Max: 49
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 43 / Avg: 45.11 / Max: 47
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.2 / Max: 44
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 43 / Avg: 45.8 / Max: 51
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 47.8 / Max: 52
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 43 / Avg: 50.67 / Max: 55
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 34 / Avg: 41.28 / Max: 47
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 42 / Avg: 47.62 / Max: 52
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 30 / Avg: 47.13 / Max: 53
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 50 / Max: 57
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 46.5 / Max: 55
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 46 / Avg: 53.38 / Max: 58
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 49.13 / Max: 55
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 55 / Max: 59
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 39 / Avg: 44.57 / Max: 55
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 50 / Avg: 56.43 / Max: 59
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 38 / Avg: 49.29 / Max: 54
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 50 / Avg: 55.43 / Max: 59
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 38 / Avg: 46.14 / Max: 54
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 56.43 / Max: 60
OpenJPEG CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenJPEG 2.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 29 / Avg: 32 / Max: 38
OpenJPEG System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenJPEG 2.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 40.71 / Max: 44
OpenSSL CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 34 / Avg: 45.57 / Max: 53
OpenSSL System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 45 / Avg: 53.71 / Max: 59
OpenVKL CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 1.3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 34 / Avg: 42.26 / Max: 55
OpenVKL System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 1.3.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 49.69 / Max: 58
OpenVKL CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 1.3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 38 / Avg: 43.94 / Max: 55
OpenVKL System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 1.3.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 45 / Avg: 51.13 / Max: 59
OSPRay CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 35 / Avg: 46 / Max: 55
OSPRay System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 45 / Avg: 55.9 / Max: 62
OSPRay CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 51 / Max: 58
OSPRay System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 48 / Avg: 56.7 / Max: 62
OSPRay CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 42 / Avg: 47.6 / Max: 57
OSPRay System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 57.6 / Max: 62
OSPRay CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 40 / Avg: 55.91 / Max: 59
OSPRay System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 59.45 / Max: 63
OSPRay CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 42 / Avg: 49.63 / Max: 58
OSPRay System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 55.4 / Max: 62
OSPRay CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 39 / Avg: 49.29 / Max: 59
OSPRay System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 47 / Avg: 55.52 / Max: 62
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 34 / Avg: 42 / Max: 55
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 54.64 / Max: 59
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 45.13 / Max: 55
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 47 / Avg: 53.2 / Max: 60
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 44.54 / Max: 55
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 50 / Avg: 53 / Max: 60
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 45.87 / Max: 56
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 48 / Avg: 53.4 / Max: 61
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 45.63 / Max: 56
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 48 / Avg: 54.81 / Max: 61
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 50.48 / Max: 58
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 51 / Avg: 58.23 / Max: 62
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.57 / Max: 55
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 55.71 / Max: 61
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 46 / Max: 57
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 54.69 / Max: 61
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 44.23 / Max: 56
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 51 / Avg: 54.85 / Max: 60
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 39 / Avg: 45.8 / Max: 57
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 47 / Avg: 52.47 / Max: 60
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 47.19 / Max: 56
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 46 / Avg: 54.69 / Max: 61
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 49.48 / Max: 57
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 47 / Avg: 56.65 / Max: 62
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 42 / Avg: 46.14 / Max: 56
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 50 / Avg: 54.64 / Max: 61
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 43.33 / Max: 53
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 49 / Avg: 54.17 / Max: 58
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.14 / Max: 54
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 54.5 / Max: 60
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 43.57 / Max: 55
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 55.93 / Max: 61
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 38 / Avg: 47.17 / Max: 56
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 47 / Avg: 54.72 / Max: 62
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 50.72 / Max: 58
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 50 / Avg: 58.04 / Max: 63
Pennant CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 33 / Avg: 44.36 / Max: 48
Pennant System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 42 / Avg: 52.36 / Max: 54
Pennant CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 49.39 / Max: 53
Pennant System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 43 / Avg: 55.3 / Max: 57
Perl Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 33.03 / Max: 39
Perl Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 37 / Avg: 41.28 / Max: 47
Perl Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.83 / Max: 30
Perl Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.5 / Max: 41
PJSIP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PJSIP 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.88 / Max: 32
PJSIP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PJSIP 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.12 / Max: 42
PJSIP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PJSIP 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 28 / Avg: 36.55 / Max: 41
PJSIP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PJSIP 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 43.4 / Max: 49
PJSIP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PJSIP 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 32 / Max: 35
PJSIP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PJSIP 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 40.71 / Max: 43
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29.24 / Max: 32
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 41.08 / Max: 43
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 26 / Avg: 28.56 / Max: 30
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 41.72 / Max: 43
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.48 / Max: 30
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 41.29 / Max: 43
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.16 / Max: 29
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 42.6 / Max: 44
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 26 / Avg: 28.85 / Max: 30
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 41.09 / Max: 44
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.44 / Max: 29
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 38.44 / Max: 42
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 26.63 / Max: 28
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.64 / Max: 42
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.76 / Max: 30
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 40.2 / Max: 43
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.96 / Max: 30
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 40.76 / Max: 43
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29.96 / Max: 32
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 42.6 / Max: 44
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29.96 / Max: 32
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 41.33 / Max: 44
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.32 / Max: 33
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 41.8 / Max: 45
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 36.64 / Max: 39
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 43 / Max: 46
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 32.88 / Max: 36
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 42.92 / Max: 46
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 35.03 / Max: 39
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 42.52 / Max: 46
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 29 / Avg: 38.6 / Max: 41
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 45.12 / Max: 47
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 29 / Avg: 38.16 / Max: 41
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 46.52 / Max: 48
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 41.47 / Max: 44
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 47.86 / Max: 50
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 33 / Avg: 40.09 / Max: 43
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 42 / Avg: 47.94 / Max: 50
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 33 / Avg: 42.4 / Max: 45
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 42 / Avg: 49.16 / Max: 51
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 34 / Avg: 46.4 / Max: 51
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 45 / Avg: 52.82 / Max: 56
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 37 / Avg: 47.21 / Max: 49
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 48 / Avg: 53.11 / Max: 55
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 45.82 / Max: 48
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 45 / Avg: 51.94 / Max: 54
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 46.87 / Max: 51
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 47 / Avg: 52.93 / Max: 55
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 42.57 / Max: 51
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 45 / Avg: 50.86 / Max: 57
PolyBench-C CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 33 / Avg: 34.08 / Max: 35
PolyBench-C System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 45.08 / Max: 51
PolyBench-C CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.85 / Max: 33
PolyBench-C System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 43.08 / Max: 47
PolyBench-C CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.15 / Max: 31
PolyBench-C System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 41.31 / Max: 47
Primesieve CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 8.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 34 / Avg: 48.4 / Max: 55
Primesieve System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 8.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 43 / Avg: 55 / Max: 60
Quantum ESPRESSO CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 7.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 35 / Avg: 55.09 / Max: 59
Quantum ESPRESSO System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 7.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 46 / Avg: 60.54 / Max: 63
QMCPACK CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 38 / Avg: 52.73 / Max: 56
QMCPACK System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.13 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 58.77 / Max: 61
QuantLib CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 37 / Max: 40
QuantLib System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better QuantLib 1.21 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 50.47 / Max: 53
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 32 / Avg: 34.83 / Max: 36
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 42 / Avg: 46.06 / Max: 49
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 32 / Avg: 34.55 / Max: 36
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.21 / Max: 45
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 33.61 / Max: 35
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 44.03 / Max: 48
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 33.05 / Max: 34
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 44.27 / Max: 47
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 32.69 / Max: 34
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 44.66 / Max: 48
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 32.59 / Max: 34
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 44.43 / Max: 47
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 32.66 / Max: 34
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 46 / Max: 47
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.38 / Max: 34
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 44.22 / Max: 47
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.49 / Max: 35
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.6 / Max: 47
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.78 / Max: 33
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 44.35 / Max: 47
rav1e CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 31 / Max: 35
rav1e System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 42.2 / Max: 46
rav1e CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 29 / Avg: 33.13 / Max: 42
rav1e System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 44.67 / Max: 49
rav1e CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 29 / Avg: 33.74 / Max: 41
rav1e System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 43.32 / Max: 50
rav1e CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 31 / Avg: 37.46 / Max: 42
rav1e System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 45.56 / Max: 49
RELION CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 24 / Avg: 55.26 / Max: 60
RELION System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 13 26 39 52 65 Min: 34 / Avg: 61.29 / Max: 66
BLAKE2 OpenBenchmarking.org Cycles Per Byte, Fewer Is Better BLAKE2 20170307 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.1205 2.241 3.3615 4.482 5.6025 SE +/- 0.03, N = 14 4.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lcrypto -lz
NAMD ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.2506 0.5012 0.7518 1.0024 1.253 SE +/- 0.00157, N = 3 1.11357
Pennant Test: leblancbig OpenBenchmarking.org Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 35.55 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
Pennant Test: sedovbig OpenBenchmarking.org Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 60.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
ArrayFire Test: Conjugate Gradient CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better ArrayFire 3.7 Test: Conjugate Gradient CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.47, N = 15 16.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -rdynamic
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 10.58 MIN: 9.6 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.62, N = 15 95.87 MIN: 90.06 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 9 11.96 MIN: 11.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.10, N = 9 28.65 MIN: 27.47 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.0955 2.191 3.2865 4.382 5.4775 SE +/- 0.00953, N = 4 4.86872 MIN: 4.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.19, N = 4 34.27 MIN: 32.03 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 59.59 MIN: 58.7 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.59, N = 3 286.17 MIN: 279.46 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 2.31, N = 3 454.52 MIN: 448.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 54.75 MIN: 52.79 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.28, N = 15 13.61 MIN: 7.46 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.25, N = 15 24.35 MIN: 16.92 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 10.00 MIN: 9.59 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.9021 1.8042 2.7063 3.6084 4.5105 SE +/- 0.03154, N = 15 4.00951 MIN: 3.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 9 11.93 MIN: 11.84 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.2494 2.4988 3.7482 4.9976 6.247 SE +/- 0.00785, N = 9 5.55297 MIN: 5.51 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.1197 2.2394 3.3591 4.4788 5.5985 SE +/- 0.02322, N = 4 4.97658 MIN: 4.85 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.0483 2.0966 3.1449 4.1932 5.2415 SE +/- 0.03286, N = 4 4.65906 MIN: 4.3 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01391, N = 5 8.03746 MIN: 7.9 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.5025 1.005 1.5075 2.01 2.5125 SE +/- 0.01188, N = 5 2.23329 MIN: 1.86 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.5189 1.0378 1.5567 2.0756 2.5945 SE +/- 0.02065, N = 4 2.30625 MIN: 2.05 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.3276 2.6552 3.9828 5.3104 6.638 SE +/- 0.78217, N = 15 5.90042 MIN: 2.25 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 61.01, N = 3 6163.96 MIN: 6045.16 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 59.21, N = 3 6167.95 MIN: 6057.96 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 82.86, N = 3 6260.78 MIN: 6085.33 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 25.88, N = 3 3364.45 MIN: 3296.18 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 31.48, N = 3 3393.93 MIN: 3323.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 24.00, N = 3 3351.30 MIN: 3292.8 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
OpenJPEG Encode: NASA Curiosity Panorama M34 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenJPEG 2.4 Encode: NASA Curiosity Panorama M34 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 244.32, N = 6 94341 1. (CXX) g++ options: -rdynamic
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 2955 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 56.32, N = 3 47104 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 196.08, N = 3 107560 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 8.88, N = 3 11742 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 436.52, N = 3 200099 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 373.42, N = 3 387699 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 4.67, N = 3 2990 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 1431.43, N = 12 49872 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 456.69, N = 3 108071 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 12.29, N = 3 11890 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 438.45, N = 3 202545 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 842.96, N = 3 392358 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 2.85, N = 3 3512 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 42.74, N = 3 68906 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 117.37, N = 3 124458 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 11.39, N = 3 13907 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 318.50, N = 3 235840 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 152.39, N = 3 456973 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: H2 OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 29.84, N = 5 4403
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Jython OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 23.73, N = 6 6130
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradebeans OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 37.87, N = 4 7386
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradesoap OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 35.51, N = 4 5092
Core-Latency Average Latency Between CPU Cores OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Core-Latency Average Latency Between CPU Cores 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 251.16 MIN: 43.29 / MAX: 536.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -pthread -O3
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Idle Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Idle Latency 2023-01-18 00:49 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.06, N = 7 70.6
Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.16, N = 9 71.37 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -static -pthread -lrt
Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.034, N = 9 6.564 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -static -pthread -lrt
Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.22, N = 9 73.70 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -static -pthread -lrt
Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.04, N = 8 75.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -static -pthread -lrt
Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.04, N = 8 81.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -static -pthread -lrt
AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 41.72 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -O3
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 0 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 0 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 241.30 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 2 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 127.09 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.025, N = 5 8.938 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 4 14.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 10, Lossless OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 10, Lossless 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.041, N = 5 8.574 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
Bork File Encrypter File Encryption Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 5 10.38
Timed Apache Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 41.25
Timed Eigen Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 159.40
Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 147.84
Timed FFmpeg Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 56.34
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 109.56
Timed ImageMagick Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 34.70
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Build: defconfig OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: defconfig 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.22, N = 3 131.75
Timed LLVM Compilation Build System: Ninja OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 641.72
Timed LLVM Compilation Build System: Unix Makefiles OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 4.68, N = 3 723.49
Timed MPlayer Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 39.43
Timed Node.js Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 18.8 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 643.11
Timed CPython Compilation Build Configuration: Default OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Default 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 32.35
Timed CPython Compilation Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 100 200 300 400 500 473.47
Timed Wasmer Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 80.75 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -ldl -lgcc_s -lutil -lrt -lpthread -lm -lc -pie -nodefaultlibs
Build2 Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.13 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 149.25
Bullet Physics Engine Test: 3000 Fall OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 3000 Fall 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.1167 2.2334 3.3501 4.4668 5.5835 SE +/- 0.008448, N = 7 4.963265 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lglut -lGL -lGLU
Bullet Physics Engine Test: 1000 Stack OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 1000 Stack 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.3266 2.6532 3.9798 5.3064 6.633 SE +/- 0.008611, N = 3 5.896145 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lglut -lGL -lGLU
Bullet Physics Engine Test: 136 Ragdolls OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 136 Ragdolls 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.8024 1.6048 2.4072 3.2096 4.012 SE +/- 0.009118, N = 3 3.566150 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lglut -lGL -lGLU
Bullet Physics Engine Test: 1000 Convex OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 1000 Convex 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.015757, N = 3 6.058387 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lglut -lGL -lGLU
Bullet Physics Engine Test: Prim Trimesh OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Prim Trimesh 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.2699 0.5398 0.8097 1.0796 1.3495 SE +/- 0.000476, N = 3 1.199460 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lglut -lGL -lGLU
Bullet Physics Engine Test: Convex Trimesh OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Convex Trimesh 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.3323 0.6646 0.9969 1.3292 1.6615 SE +/- 0.00414, N = 3 1.47690 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lglut -lGL -lGLU
C-Ray Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 59.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3
CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 76.41 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops -fopenmp
Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.62, N = 15 46.19
Parallel BZIP2 Compression FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img Compression OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.13 FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.072, N = 15 6.979 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -pthread -lbz2 -lpthread
XZ Compression Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.22, N = 15 22.41 1. (CC) gcc options: -fvisibility=hidden -O2
CP2K Molecular Dynamics Input: Fayalite-FIST OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.2 Input: Fayalite-FIST 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1666.14
Cython Benchmark Test: N-Queens OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 31.83
DeepSpeech Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.64, N = 12 151.60
FLAC Audio Encoding WAV To FLAC OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 WAV To FLAC 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.23, N = 5 36.84 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fvisibility=hidden -lm
LAME MP3 Encoding WAV To MP3 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 8 11.31 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fschedule-insns2 -fbranch-count-reg -fforce-addr -pipe -lncurses -lm
Gcrypt Library OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Gcrypt Library 1.9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.94, N = 3 291.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -fvisibility=hidden -lgpg-error
Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.7826 1.5652 2.3478 3.1304 3.913 SE +/- 0.012, N = 9 3.478 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.7679 1.5358 2.3037 3.0716 3.8395 SE +/- 0.013, N = 9 3.413 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.1603 2.3206 3.4809 4.6412 5.8015 SE +/- 0.010, N = 7 5.157 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.2074 2.4148 3.6222 4.8296 6.037 SE +/- 0.019, N = 7 5.366 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.022, N = 5 9.959 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 5 10.40 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.92 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 19.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 35.91 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 35.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 73.73 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Helsing Digit Range: 12 digit OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 12 digit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.8557 1.7114 2.5671 3.4228 4.2785 SE +/- 0.047, N = 15 3.803 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
Helsing Digit Range: 14 digit OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 14 digit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 367.36 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
Timed HMMer Search Pfam Database Search OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed HMMer Search 3.3.2 Pfam Database Search 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 192.96 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lhmmer -leasel -lm -lmpi
Xcompact3d Incompact3d Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 17.00 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -O2 -funroll-loops -floop-optimize -fcray-pointer -fbacktrace -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
Xcompact3d Incompact3d Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 74.14 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -O2 -funroll-loops -floop-optimize -fcray-pointer -fbacktrace -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
Xcompact3d Incompact3d Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 14.27, N = 5 1365.31 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -O2 -funroll-loops -floop-optimize -fcray-pointer -fbacktrace -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
m-queens Time To Solve OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 50.85 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -O2 -march=native
Timed MAFFT Alignment Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.16, N = 4 14.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -O3 -lm -lpthread
Mencoder AVI To LAVC OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Mencoder 1.3.0 AVI To LAVC 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 22.13 1. (CC) gcc options: -ffast-math -fpie -pie -lncurses -lrt -lpng -lz -ljpeg -lbz2 -llzo2 -lvorbisenc -lvorbis -logg -rdynamic -lm
Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae Input: Dust 2D tau100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2019-03-24 Input: Dust 2D tau100.0 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 4.06, N = 12 174 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -Jsource/ -ffree-line-length-0 -lm -std=legacy -O3 -O2 -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
Timed MrBayes Analysis Primate Phylogeny Analysis OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 222.31 1. (CC) gcc options: -mmmx -msse -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -maes -mavx -mrdrnd -O3 -std=c99 -pedantic -lm -lreadline
Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.0451 0.0902 0.1353 0.1804 0.2255 SE +/- 0.00088128, N = 3 0.20044505
Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.0004 0.0008 0.0012 0.0016 0.002 SE +/- 0.00001764, N = 3 0.00172632
PolyBench-C Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.7153 1.4306 2.1459 2.8612 3.5765 SE +/- 0.085, N = 15 3.179 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
PolyBench-C Test: Correlation Computation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Correlation Computation 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.6073 1.2146 1.8219 2.4292 3.0365 SE +/- 0.093, N = 15 2.699 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
PolyBench-C Test: Covariance Computation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Covariance Computation 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.5857 1.1714 1.7571 2.3428 2.9285 SE +/- 0.091, N = 15 2.603 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
Primesieve Length: 1e12 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 8.0 Length: 1e12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 20.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
Primesieve Length: 1e13 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 8.0 Length: 1e13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 235.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
Quantum ESPRESSO Input: AUSURF112 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 7.0 Input: AUSURF112 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4320 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -pthread -fopenmp -ldevXlib -llapack -lblas -lFoX_dom -lFoX_sax -lFoX_wxml -lFoX_common -lFoX_utils -lFoX_fsys -lfftw3_omp -lfftw3 -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
RELION Test: Basic - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 Test: Basic - Device: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 1605.20 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -std=c++0x -O3 -rdynamic -lmpi_cxx -lmpi -ldl -ltiff -lfftw3f -lfftw3 -lpng
QMCPACK Input: simple-H2O OpenBenchmarking.org Total Execution Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.13 Input: simple-H2O 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 55.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -finline-limit=1000 -fstrict-aliasing -funroll-all-loops -ffast-math -march=native -O3 -lm
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0161 0.0322 0.0483 0.0644 0.0805 SE +/- 0.0002, N = 3 0.0714 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0187 0.0374 0.0561 0.0748 0.0935 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0829 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0227 0.0454 0.0681 0.0908 0.1135 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.1007 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0102 0.0204 0.0306 0.0408 0.051 SE +/- 0.0000, N = 3 0.0454 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0173 0.0346 0.0519 0.0692 0.0865 SE +/- 0.0011, N = 15 0.0768 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0198 0.0396 0.0594 0.0792 0.099 SE +/- 0.0012, N = 3 0.0880 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0241 0.0482 0.0723 0.0964 0.1205 SE +/- 0.0003, N = 3 0.1069 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0106 0.0212 0.0318 0.0424 0.053 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0472 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0204 0.0408 0.0612 0.0816 0.102 SE +/- 0.0006, N = 3 0.0906 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 2023-01-18 21:59 0.022 0.044 0.066 0.088 0.11 SE +/- 0.0005, N = 3 0.0976 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0268 0.0536 0.0804 0.1072 0.134 SE +/- 0.0012, N = 15 0.1192 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0107 0.0214 0.0321 0.0428 0.0535 SE +/- 0.0002, N = 3 0.0477 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0209 0.0418 0.0627 0.0836 0.1045 SE +/- 0.0003, N = 3 0.0928 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0226 0.0452 0.0678 0.0904 0.113 SE +/- 0.0005, N = 3 0.1005 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.029 0.058 0.087 0.116 0.145 SE +/- 0.0015, N = 4 0.1288 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0113 0.0226 0.0339 0.0452 0.0565 SE +/- 0.0005, N = 3 0.0504 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0216 0.0432 0.0648 0.0864 0.108 SE +/- 0.0007, N = 3 0.0960 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0241 0.0482 0.0723 0.0964 0.1205 SE +/- 0.0007, N = 13 0.1070 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.029 0.058 0.087 0.116 0.145 SE +/- 0.0014, N = 4 0.1291 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0118 0.0236 0.0354 0.0472 0.059 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0525 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.024 0.048 0.072 0.096 0.12 SE +/- 0.0011, N = 15 0.1068 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 2023-01-18 21:59 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 SE +/- 0.0007, N = 3 0.1333 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0321 0.0642 0.0963 0.1284 0.1605 SE +/- 0.0019, N = 3 0.1426 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0147 0.0294 0.0441 0.0588 0.0735 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0655 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0256 0.0512 0.0768 0.1024 0.128 SE +/- 0.0012, N = 5 0.1136 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0313 0.0626 0.0939 0.1252 0.1565 SE +/- 0.0016, N = 3 0.1391 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0337 0.0674 0.1011 0.1348 0.1685 SE +/- 0.0006, N = 3 0.1498 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0148 0.0296 0.0444 0.0592 0.074 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0658 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5