2023-01-16-2136 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 testing with a Supermicro X9DR3-F v0123456789 (3.4 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450 on Arch Linux via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2301215-NE-MERGE967543&grr .
2023-01-16-2136 Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Compiler File-System Screen Resolution 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #23 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #28 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #29 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #30 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #31 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #33 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #34 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #35 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #36 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #37 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #38 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #39 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #40 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #42 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #43 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #44 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #45 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #46 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #47 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #48 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #51 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #52 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #53 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #54 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #55 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #56 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #58 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #59 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #60 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #61 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #62 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #63 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #65 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #66 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #67 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #68 2023-01-18 00:49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #69 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #70 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #71 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #72 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #73 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #74 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #75 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #76 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #77 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #78 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #79 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #80 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #81 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #82 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #83 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #84 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #85 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #86 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #87 2023-01-18 08:41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #88 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #89 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #90 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #91 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #92 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #93 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #94 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #95 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #96 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #97 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #98 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #99 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #100 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #101 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #102 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #103 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #104 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #105 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #106 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #107 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #108 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #109 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #110 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #111 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #112 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #113 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #114 2023-01-18 21:59 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #115 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #116 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #117 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #118 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #119 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #120 2023-01-19 04:50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #121 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #122 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #123 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #124 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 @ 3.60GHz (20 Cores / 40 Threads) Supermicro X9DR3-F v0123456789 (3.4 BIOS) Intel Xeon E7 v2/Xeon 128GB 120GB KINGSTON SA400S3 Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450 2 x Intel I350 Arch Linux 6.1.6-arch1-1 (x86_64) GCC 12.2.0 xfs 1280x1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: always Compiler Details - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #2, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #3, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #4, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #6, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #7, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #8, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #10, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #11, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #12, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #13, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #14, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #15, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #16, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #17, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #18, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #19, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #20, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #21, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #22, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #23, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #24, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #25, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #26, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #27, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #28, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #29, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #30, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #31, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #32, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #33, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #34, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #35, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #36, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #38, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #39, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #40, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #41, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #42, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #43, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #45, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #48, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #50, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #51, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #53, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #54, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #55, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #56, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #57, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #58, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #59, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #60, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #62, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #63, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #64, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #65, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #66, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #67, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #68, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #69, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #73, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #74, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #75, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #76, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #77, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #78, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #79, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #80, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #81, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #83, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #85, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #86, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #87, 2023-01-18 08:41, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #88, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #89, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #90, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #91, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #92, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #93, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #94, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #95, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #96, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #98, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #99, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #100, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #102, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #104, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #105, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #107, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #110, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #111, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #112, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #114, 2023-01-18 21:59, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #115, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #116, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #117, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #118, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #119, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #120, 2023-01-19 04:50, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #122, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #124: --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-werror --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet=auto --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-default-ssp --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,c++,ada,fortran,go,lto,objc,obj-c++,d --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-link-serialization=1 --enable-lto --enable-multilib --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-linker-hash-style=gnu Processor Details - Scaling Governor: intel_cpufreq performance - CPU Microcode: 0x42e Security Details - itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of VMX disabled + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT vulnerable + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + mmio_stale_data: Unknown: No mitigations + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Retpolines IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected Java Details - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #9, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #47, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #70, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #71, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #72: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.17+1) Python Details - 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #17, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #18, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #21, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #22, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #24, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #33, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #46, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #101, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #111, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #118, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #122: Python 3.10.9
2023-01-16-2136 qe: AUSURF112 incompact3d: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d relion: Basic - CPU lczero: Eigen jpegxl: PNG - 100 etcpak: Single-Threaded - DXT1 etcpak: Single-Threaded - ETC2 lammps: 20k Atoms jpegxl: JPEG - 100 asmfish: 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth build-llvm: Unix Makefiles mocassin: Dust 2D tau100.0 cryptopp: All Algorithms core-latency: Average Latency Between CPU Cores build-nodejs: Time To Compile build-llvm: Ninja ospray-studio: 2 - 1080p - 16 - Path Tracer cp2k: Fayalite-FIST deepspeech: CPU ospray-studio: 3 - 4K - 32 - Path Tracer openvkl: vklBenchmark Scalar openvkl: vklBenchmark ISPC ospray-studio: 2 - 4K - 32 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 1 - 4K - 32 - Path Tracer minibude: OpenMP - BM2 minibude: OpenMP - BM2 numpy: cryptopp: Keyed Algorithms helsing: 14 digit npb: SP.C fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 4096 ospray: particle_volume/scivis/real_time pmbench: 4 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 32 - 100% Writes pmbench: 2 - 100% Writes gcrypt: npb: BT.C ospray: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 4096 pmbench: 16 - 50% compress-lz4: 3 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Compression Speed npb: LU.C cryptopp: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Medium kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Slow ospray-studio: 3 - 4K - 16 - Path Tracer avifenc: 0 primesieve: 1e13 compress-gzip: Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz libgav1: Chimera 1080p 10-bit mbw: Memory Copy - 8192 MiB mrbayes: Primate Phylogeny Analysis ospray-studio: 2 - 4K - 16 - Path Tracer ospray: particle_volume/ao/real_time ospray-studio: 1 - 4K - 16 - Path Tracer compress-zstd: 19 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19 - Compression Speed hpcg: jpegxl: JPEG - 80 hmmer: Pfam Database Search jpegxl: PNG - 80 mt-dgemm: Sustained Floating-Point Rate oidn: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 openssl: SHA256 mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 8192 MiB clomp: Static OMP Speedup ospray-studio: 1 - 1080p - 16 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 3 - 4K - 1 - Path Tracer jpegxl: JPEG - 90 npb: CG.C build-eigen: Time To Compile ospray-studio: 2 - 4K - 1 - Path Tracer build-python: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized compress-zstd: 8 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 8 - Compression Speed ospray-studio: 1 - 4K - 1 - Path Tracer jpegxl: PNG - 90 mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 4096 MiB build2: Time To Compile build-erlang: Time To Compile intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Max Bandwidth - All Reads gmpbench: Total Time ospray: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time ospray: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time npb: EP.D ospray-studio: 3 - 1080p - 32 - Path Tracer fhourstones: Complex Connect-4 Solving build-linux-kernel: defconfig ospray-studio: 3 - 1080p - 1 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 2 - 1080p - 1 - Path Tracer ospray: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time avifenc: 2 ospray-studio: 1 - 1080p - 1 - Path Tracer cachebench: Read cachebench: Write cachebench: Read / Modify / Write jpegxl-decode: 1 ospray-studio: 2 - 1080p - 32 - Path Tracer kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Very Fast ospray-studio: 1 - 1080p - 32 - Path Tracer mbw: Memory Copy - 4096 MiB compress-xz: Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 build-gdb: Time To Compile mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - u8s8f32 onednn: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - u8s8f32 - CPU fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 2048 pmbench: 40 - 100% Writes onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - bf16bf16bf16 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - f32 - CPU ramspeed: Copy - Floating Point ramspeed: Triad - Floating Point ramspeed: Add - Floating Point ramspeed: Scale - Floating Point chia-vdf: Square Plain C++ ramspeed: Average - Floating Point libgav1: Summer Nature 4K compress-lz4: 9 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Compression Speed oidn: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Super Fast oidn: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 2048 libgav1: Chimera 1080p ramspeed: Copy - Integer ramspeed: Triad - Integer ramspeed: Average - Integer ramspeed: Add - Integer ramspeed: Scale - Integer onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - bf16bf16bf16 - CPU pmbench: 8 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 16 - 80% Reads 20% Writes minibude: OpenMP - BM1 minibude: OpenMP - BM1 perl-benchmark: Pod2html build-wasmer: Time To Compile npb: SP.B ospray-studio: 3 - 1080p - 16 - Path Tracer cloverleaf: Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics incompact3d: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction hackbench: 32 - Process chia-vdf: Square Assembly Optimized mbw: Memory Copy - 512 MiB namd: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms rav1e: 1 kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Slow pjsip: INVITE kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Medium cryptopp: Unkeyed Algorithms pjsip: OPTIONS, Stateful luxcorerender: Orange Juice - CPU luxcorerender: Danish Mood - CPU luxcorerender: LuxCore Benchmark - CPU pmbench: 1 - 100% Writes pmbench: 2 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 2 - 50% pmbench: 1 - 50% pmbench: 32 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 40 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 40 - 50% pmbench: 4 - 50% pmbench: 1 - 80% Reads 20% Writes pmbench: 32 - 50% pmbench: 8 - 50% pmbench: 4 - 100% Writes pmbench: 40 - 100% Reads pmbench: 32 - 100% Reads pmbench: 16 - 100% Writes pmbench: 8 - 100% Writes pmbench: 16 - 100% Reads pmbench: 8 - 100% Reads pmbench: 4 - 100% Reads pmbench: 2 - 100% Reads pmbench: 1 - 100% Reads himeno: Poisson Pressure Solver encode-flac: WAV To FLAC luxcorerender: DLSC - CPU onednn: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - u8s8f32 - CPU pennant: sedovbig c-ray: Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel openssl: RSA4096 openssl: RSA4096 graphics-magick: HWB Color Space graphics-magick: Enhanced graphics-magick: Sharpen graphics-magick: Noise-Gaussian graphics-magick: Swirl graphics-magick: Rotate graphics-magick: Resizing npb: FT.C mkl-dnn: IP Batch All - u8s8f32 mkl-dnn: IP Batch All - f32 kvazaar: Bosphorus 4K - Ultra Fast perl-benchmark: Interpreter embree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragon Obj build-ffmpeg: Time To Compile embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon Obj qmcpack: simple-H2O mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 512 MiB mpcbench: Multi-Precision Benchmark compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed m-queens: Time To Solve lzbench: XZ 0 - Decompression lzbench: XZ 0 - Compression pjsip: OPTIONS, Stateless jpegxl-decode: All libraw: Post-Processing Benchmark ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 4096 etcpak: Multi-Threaded - ETC2 quantlib: rav1e: 10 etcpak: Multi-Threaded - DXT1 rav1e: 5 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 4096 compress-7zip: Decompression Rating compress-7zip: Compression Rating blosc: blosclz bitshuffle aobench: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time build-apache: Time To Compile compress-zstd: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 3 - Compression Speed java-scimark2: Composite embree: Pathtracer - Crown build-mplayer: Time To Compile compress-zstd: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 1 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 1 - Compression Speed embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Crown minife: Small mkl-dnn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - f32 ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 2048 mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 1024 MiB mkl-dnn: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - f32 dav1d: Chimera 1080p 10-bit ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 2048 hackbench: 16 - Thread pennant: leblancbig hackbench: 16 - Process compress-pbzip2: FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img Compression build-imagemagick: Time To Compile rav1e: 6 embree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragon lzbench: Crush 0 - Decompression lzbench: Crush 0 - Compression ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 1024 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 1024 botan: AES-256 - Decrypt botan: AES-256 cython-bench: N-Queens ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 512 onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - f32 - CPU embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - u8s8f32 - CPU ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 256 kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Very Fast ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 512 botan: Blowfish - Decrypt botan: Blowfish botan: Twofish - Decrypt botan: Twofish ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 128 botan: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt botan: ChaCha20Poly1305 encode-mp3: WAV To MP3 botan: CAST-256 - Decrypt botan: CAST-256 botan: KASUMI - Decrypt botan: KASUMI ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 128 mbw: Memory Copy - 1024 MiB libgav1: Summer Nature 1080p ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 128 dav1d: Chimera 1080p coremark: CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second luajit: Composite lzbench: Zstd 8 - Decompression lzbench: Zstd 8 - Compression lzbench: Brotli 2 - Decompression lzbench: Brotli 2 - Compression kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Super Fast lzbench: Brotli 0 - Decompression lzbench: Brotli 0 - Compression lzbench: Libdeflate 1 - Decompression lzbench: Libdeflate 1 - Compression amg: intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes intel-mlc: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads dav1d: Summer Nature 4K lzbench: Zstd 1 - Decompression lzbench: Zstd 1 - Compression blosc: blosclz shuffle mencoder: AVI To LAVC arrayfire: Conjugate Gradient CPU mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - f32 arrayfire: BLAS CPU onednn: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - f32 - CPU primesieve: 1e12 dacapobench: Tradesoap luxcorerender: Rainbow Colors and Prism - CPU fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 256 mkl-dnn: IP Batch 1D - u8s8f32 mkl-dnn: IP Batch 1D - f32 liquid-dsp: 1 - 256 - 57 ebizzy: ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 4096 kvazaar: Bosphorus 1080p - Ultra Fast onednn: IP Shapes 1D - f32 - CPU onednn: IP Shapes 1D - u8s8f32 - CPU liquid-dsp: 40 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 32 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 16 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 8 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 4 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 2 - 256 - 57 dacapobench: Tradebeans hackbench: 8 - Thread npb: MG.C avifenc: 6, Lossless helsing: 12 digit hackbench: 8 - Process ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 4096 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 2048 mafft: Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 1024 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 1024 incompact3d: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 1024 hackbench: 4 - Thread bork: File Encryption Time ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 512 ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 256 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 512 dacapobench: Jython hackbench: 4 - Process dacapobench: H2 lulesh: ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 2048 onednn: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - f32 - CPU ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 256 polybench-c: 3 Matrix Multiplications openjpeg: NASA Curiosity Panorama M34 onednn: IP Shapes 3D - f32 - CPU ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 1024 ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 128 onednn: IP Shapes 3D - u8s8f32 - CPU dav1d: Summer Nature 1080p avifenc: 6 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 4096 npb: EP.C avifenc: 10, Lossless intel-mlc: Idle Latency ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 256 bullet: 3000 Fall fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 512 polybench-c: Correlation Computation polybench-c: Covariance Computation lammps: Rhodopsin Protein fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 1024 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 512 hackbench: 2 - Thread fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 512 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 2048 mbw: Memory Copy - 128 MiB hackbench: 2 - Process fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 256 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 4096 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 32 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 128 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 64 multichase: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride build-python: Default fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 128 hackbench: 1 - Process fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 512 multichase: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 32 fftw: Float + SSE - 1D FFT Size 1024 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 256 multichase: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads hackbench: 1 - Thread fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 32 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 256 nettle: aes256 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 2048 fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 128 multichase: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - u8s8f32 onednn: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - f32 - CPU fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 64 mkl-dnn: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - f32 mbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 128 MiB onednn: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - u8s8f32 - CPU multichase: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 128 ffte: N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine fftw: Stock - 2D FFT Size 64 fftw: Stock - 1D FFT Size 64 nettle: sha512 fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 32 nettle: chacha blake2: nettle: poly1305-aes luajit: Dense LU Matrix Factorization luajit: Sparse Matrix Multiply luajit: Monte Carlo luajit: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation luajit: Fast Fourier Transform java-scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization java-scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiply java-scimark2: Monte Carlo java-scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation java-scimark2: Fast Fourier Transform bullet: Convex Trimesh bullet: Prim Trimesh bullet: 1000 Convex bullet: 136 Ragdolls bullet: 1000 Stack 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #23 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #24 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #28 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #29 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #30 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #31 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #33 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #34 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #35 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #36 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #37 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #38 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #39 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #40 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #42 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #43 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #44 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #45 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #46 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #47 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #48 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #51 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #52 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #53 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #54 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #55 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #56 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #58 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #59 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #60 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #61 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #62 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #63 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #65 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #66 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #67 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #68 2023-01-18 00:49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #69 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #70 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #71 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #72 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #73 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #74 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #75 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #76 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #77 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #78 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #79 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #80 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #81 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #82 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #83 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #84 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #85 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #86 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #87 2023-01-18 08:41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #88 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #89 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #90 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #91 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #92 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #93 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #94 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #95 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #96 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #97 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #98 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #99 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #100 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #101 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #102 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #103 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #104 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #105 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #106 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #107 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #108 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #109 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #110 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #111 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #112 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #113 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #114 2023-01-18 21:59 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #115 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #116 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #117 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #118 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #119 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #120 2023-01-19 04:50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #121 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #122 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #123 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #124 4320 1365.30962 1605.203 555 0.38 13.285 13.396 9.019 0.37 45857969 723.494 174 1112.355677 251.162 643.106 641.719 49872 1666.144 151.59714 456973 98 165 392358 387699 13.515 337.881 233.96 417.056544 367.364 4492.17 9666.4 4.54025 291.876 10118.43 93.1747 3657.2 5748.3 36.89 7972.95 3355.211650 2.34 2.35 235840 241.300 235.121 46.190 38.91 222.308 202545 4.57608 200099 2046.4 55.4 9.47093 6.09 192.963 6.27 6.156392 0.16 4390282293 21.9 47104 13907 6.01 4651.34 159.400 11890 473.473 2293.9 752.1 11742 6.19 149.245 147.843 3809.2 2.58492 2.63233 1011.04 124458 12322.4 131.747 3512 2990 3.37937 127.085 2955 3047.544938 23550.000207 26799.194125 21.49 108071 5.05 107560 22.412 109.556 95.8687 4.00951 11246 6260.78 6167.95 6163.96 95200 38.80 5772.9 35.47 0.33 6.53 0.33 3781.8 98.76 3393.93 3364.45 3351.30 13.053 326.311 0.20044505 80.752 4438.95 68906 76.41 74.1437988 73.734 122300 1.11357 0.289 8.73 4313 8.87 269.163351 7017 2.75 1.33 1.46 2767.314239 36.839 1.89 5.90042 60.12327 59.495 174679.4 2638.4 885 209 193 309 524 586 1168 6936.26 286.172 59.5889 10.31 0.00172632 17.2018 56.336 17.9245 55.365 6227 2105.8 36.7 50.847 97 33 42499 123.00 26.04 969431 296.467 1597.8 4.340 297.076 1.315 997032 93600 103020 5328.4 41.723 41.247 2451.7 819.6 2105.5 1731.02 15.9529 39.432 2467.3 701.7 6086.3 5265.50 16.5368 8821.67 454.520 1205781 54.7522 246.13 1245243 35.933 35.54626 35.914 6.979 34.702 1.739 18.8100 427 96 1369849 1400303 2247.137 2249.225 31.825 1423173 13.6139 20.4129 24.3524 1456508 19.54 1468795 287.371 283.243 242.309 246.375 894830 406.706 409.972 11.308 104.161 104.169 71.118 74.638 1518852 127.98 1598981 332.46 548071.494966 1102.50 1138 73 528 149 25.26 456 371 843 176 487410933 157.83 1207 366 10291.7 22.133 16.08 10.5847 786.980 10.00285 20.616 5092 7.69 18608 34.2686 4.86872 20848000 480762 634940 39.70 4.97658 4.65906 482050000 427003333 274363333 143850000 76182667 39569000 7386 19.559 8770.48 14.378 3.803 18.915 634269 881643 14.002 5012.3 819687 16.9970862 15595 10.397 10.380 871455 873506 1219637 6130 9.959 4403 5469.1930 736147 2.30625 1289164 3.179 94341 8.03746 1086971 1346662 2.23329 486.22 8.938 18527 1005.35 8.574 1495301 4.963265 5011.5 2.699 2.603 9.050 5474.0 15398 5.366 19980 19554 5.157 4917.5 5181.0 9422.2 16083 13958 73.703 32.353 17556 3.478 5570.8 81.495 6185.9 20280 14704 75.070 3.413 6356.4 5499.5 1381.15 5269.1 5147.0 71.369 28.6540 11.9317 19833 11.9557 5.55297 6.564 5775.4 49494.591807589 5451.3 6034.9 404.22 20488 813.26 4.98 2246.07 2110.58 1073.79 414.51 1506.33 407.29 3703.27 1513.21 850.07 1501.77 1086.80 1.47690 1.199460 6.058387 3.566150 5.896145 73285.82 61700.31 69044.54 71395.63 78336.45 70345.1 61036.9 68893.0 71313.5 78161.3 70.6 3656.539 4746.317 4701.578 3564.934 3575.777 4854.788 4769.068 3547.809 3656.793 4770.596 0.1192 0.1068 0.0768 0.1070 0.1136 0.1288 0.1291 0.0714 0.1069 0.0880 0.0829 0.1426 0.1498 0.1391 0.0976 0.1007 0.1333 0.1005 0.0906 0.0658 0.0655 0.0960 0.0928 0.0525 0.0504 0.0477 0.0472 0.0454 17769.94 18388.89 18836.90 17914.34 18332.59 17807.62 20323.93 19264.94 20084.53 18843.10 OpenBenchmarking.org
Quantum ESPRESSO Input: AUSURF112 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 7.0 Input: AUSURF112 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4320 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -pthread -fopenmp -ldevXlib -llapack -lblas -lFoX_dom -lFoX_sax -lFoX_wxml -lFoX_common -lFoX_utils -lFoX_fsys -lfftw3_omp -lfftw3 -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
Xcompact3d Incompact3d Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 14.27, N = 5 1365.31 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -O2 -funroll-loops -floop-optimize -fcray-pointer -fbacktrace -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
RELION Test: Basic - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 Test: Basic - Device: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 1605.20 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -std=c++0x -O3 -rdynamic -lmpi_cxx -lmpi -ldl -ltiff -lfftw3f -lfftw3 -lpng
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: Eigen 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 5.30, N = 9 555 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -pthread
JPEG XL libjxl Input: PNG - Quality: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: PNG - Quality: 100 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.0855 0.171 0.2565 0.342 0.4275 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 0.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fno-rtti -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -fPIE -pie -lm -latomic
Etcpak Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 13.29 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Single-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 13.40 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: 20k Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: 20k Atoms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.014, N = 3 9.019 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lm -ldl
JPEG XL libjxl Input: JPEG - Quality: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: JPEG - Quality: 100 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.0833 0.1666 0.2499 0.3332 0.4165 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 0.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fno-rtti -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -fPIE -pie -lm -latomic
asmFish 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes/second, More Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10M 20M 30M 40M 50M SE +/- 339347.10, N = 12 45857969
Timed LLVM Compilation Build System: Unix Makefiles OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 4.68, N = 3 723.49
Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae Input: Dust 2D tau100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2019-03-24 Input: Dust 2D tau100.0 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 4.06, N = 12 174 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -Jsource/ -ffree-line-length-0 -lm -std=legacy -O3 -O2 -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
Crypto++ Test: All Algorithms OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/second, More Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 Test: All Algorithms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 1112.36 1. (CXX) g++ options: -g2 -O3 -fPIC -pthread -pipe
Core-Latency Average Latency Between CPU Cores OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Core-Latency Average Latency Between CPU Cores 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 251.16 MIN: 43.29 / MAX: 536.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -pthread -O3
Timed Node.js Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 18.8 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 643.11
Timed LLVM Compilation Build System: Ninja OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 641.72
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 1431.43, N = 12 49872 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
CP2K Molecular Dynamics Input: Fayalite-FIST OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.2 Input: Fayalite-FIST 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1666.14
DeepSpeech Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.64, N = 12 151.60
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 152.39, N = 3 456973 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OpenVKL Benchmark: vklBenchmark Scalar OpenBenchmarking.org Items / Sec, More Is Better OpenVKL 1.3.1 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Scalar 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 98 MIN: 10 / MAX: 1646
OpenVKL Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC OpenBenchmarking.org Items / Sec, More Is Better OpenVKL 1.3.1 Benchmark: vklBenchmark ISPC 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.73, N = 3 165 MIN: 18 / MAX: 1832
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 842.96, N = 3 392358 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 373.42, N = 3 387699 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
miniBUDE Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 OpenBenchmarking.org Billion Interactions/s, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 13.52 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -Ofast -ffast-math -fopenmp -march=native -lm
miniBUDE Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 OpenBenchmarking.org GFInst/s, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 337.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -Ofast -ffast-math -fopenmp -march=native -lm
Numpy Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Numpy Benchmark 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 233.96
Crypto++ Test: Keyed Algorithms OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/second, More Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Keyed Algorithms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 417.06 1. (CXX) g++ options: -g2 -O3 -fPIC -pthread -pipe
Helsing Digit Range: 14 digit OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 14 digit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 367.36 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: SP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 3.50, N = 3 4492.17 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 11.19, N = 3 9666.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
OSPRay Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.0216 2.0432 3.0648 4.0864 5.108 SE +/- 0.01469, N = 3 4.54025
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0268 0.0536 0.0804 0.1072 0.134 SE +/- 0.0012, N = 15 0.1192 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.024 0.048 0.072 0.096 0.12 SE +/- 0.0011, N = 15 0.1068 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0173 0.0346 0.0519 0.0692 0.0865 SE +/- 0.0011, N = 15 0.0768 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
Gcrypt Library OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Gcrypt Library 1.9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.94, N = 3 291.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -fvisibility=hidden -lgpg-error
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: BT.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 16.53, N = 3 10118.43 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
OSPRay Benchmark: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 93.17
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 2.80, N = 3 3657.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0241 0.0482 0.0723 0.0964 0.1205 SE +/- 0.0007, N = 13 0.1070 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 11.20, N = 9 5748.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.30, N = 9 36.89 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: LU.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 12.71, N = 3 7972.95 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
Crypto++ Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/second, More Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 2.65, N = 3 3355.21 1. (CXX) g++ options: -g2 -O3 -fPIC -pthread -pipe
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.5265 1.053 1.5795 2.106 2.6325 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 2.34 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.5288 1.0576 1.5864 2.1152 2.644 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 2.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 318.50, N = 3 235840 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 0 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 0 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 241.30 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
Primesieve Length: 1e13 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 8.0 Length: 1e13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 235.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.62, N = 15 46.19
libgav1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 38.91 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lrt
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 37.12, N = 3 3656.54 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
Timed MrBayes Analysis Primate Phylogeny Analysis OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 222.31 1. (CC) gcc options: -mmmx -msse -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -maes -mavx -mrdrnd -O3 -std=c99 -pedantic -lm -lreadline
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 438.45, N = 3 202545 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.0296 2.0592 3.0888 4.1184 5.148 SE +/- 0.01482, N = 3 4.57608
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 436.52, N = 3 200099 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 3.27, N = 15 2046.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.48, N = 15 55.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
High Performance Conjugate Gradient OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00369, N = 3 9.47093 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
JPEG XL libjxl Input: JPEG - Quality: 80 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: JPEG - Quality: 80 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 6.09 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fno-rtti -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -fPIE -pie -lm -latomic
Timed HMMer Search Pfam Database Search OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed HMMer Search 3.3.2 Pfam Database Search 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 192.96 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lhmmer -leasel -lm -lmpi
JPEG XL libjxl Input: PNG - Quality: 80 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: PNG - Quality: 80 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 6.27 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fno-rtti -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -fPIE -pie -lm -latomic
ACES DGEMM Sustained Floating-Point Rate OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.082293, N = 15 6.156392 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.036 0.072 0.108 0.144 0.18 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.16
OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA256 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 900M 1800M 2700M 3600M 4500M SE +/- 19658665.06, N = 3 4390282293 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 15.67, N = 3 4746.32 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
CLOMP Static OMP Speedup OpenBenchmarking.org Speedup, More Is Better CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.17, N = 15 21.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -lm
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 56.32, N = 3 47104 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 11.39, N = 3 13907 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
JPEG XL libjxl Input: JPEG - Quality: 90 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: JPEG - Quality: 90 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 6.01 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fno-rtti -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -fPIE -pie -lm -latomic
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: CG.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 43.30, N = 15 4651.34 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
Timed Eigen Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 159.40
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 12.29, N = 3 11890 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
Timed CPython Compilation Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Released Build, PGO + LTO Optimized 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 100 200 300 400 500 473.47
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 4.89, N = 12 2293.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 13.25, N = 12 752.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 8.88, N = 3 11742 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
JPEG XL libjxl Input: PNG - Quality: 90 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 Input: PNG - Quality: 90 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 6.19 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fno-rtti -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -fPIE -pie -lm -latomic
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 49.68, N = 5 4701.58 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
Build2 Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.13 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 149.25
Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 147.84
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like 2023-01-18 00:49 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K SE +/- 55.21, N = 3 73285.82
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes 2023-01-18 00:49 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 85.52, N = 3 61700.31
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes 2023-01-18 00:49 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 129.52, N = 3 69044.54
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes 2023-01-18 00:49 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 17.12, N = 3 71395.63
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Max Bandwidth - All Reads 2023-01-18 00:49 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 13.68, N = 3 78336.45
GNU GMP GMPbench Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org GMPbench Score, More Is Better GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 Total Time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3809.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -lm
OSPRay Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.5816 1.1632 1.7448 2.3264 2.908 SE +/- 0.00594, N = 3 2.58492
OSPRay Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.5923 1.1846 1.7769 2.3692 2.9615 SE +/- 0.00522, N = 3 2.63233
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.D OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.83, N = 3 1011.04 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 117.37, N = 3 124458 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
Fhourstones Complex Connect-4 Solving OpenBenchmarking.org Kpos / sec, More Is Better Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 13.68, N = 3 12322.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Build: defconfig OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 Build: defconfig 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.22, N = 3 131.75
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 2.85, N = 3 3512 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 4.67, N = 3 2990 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.7604 1.5208 2.2812 3.0416 3.802 SE +/- 0.00024, N = 3 3.37937
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 2 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 127.09 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 2955 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
CacheBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Read 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 3047.54 MIN: 3045.06 / MAX: 3049.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -lrt
CacheBench Test: Write OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 23550.00 MIN: 17209.85 / MAX: 26942.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -lrt
CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 26799.19 MIN: 25281.62 / MAX: 27415.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -lrt
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Threads: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 CPU Threads: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 21.49
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 456.69, N = 3 108071 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.1363 2.2726 3.4089 4.5452 5.6815 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 5.05 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 196.08, N = 3 107560 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 48.37, N = 3 3564.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
XZ Compression Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.22, N = 15 22.41 1. (CC) gcc options: -fvisibility=hidden -O2
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 109.56
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.62, N = 15 95.87 MIN: 90.06 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.9021 1.8042 2.7063 3.6084 4.5105 SE +/- 0.03154, N = 15 4.00951 MIN: 3.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 133.08, N = 3 11246 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0256 0.0512 0.0768 0.1024 0.128 SE +/- 0.0012, N = 5 0.1136 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 82.86, N = 3 6260.78 MIN: 6085.33 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 59.21, N = 3 6167.95 MIN: 6057.96 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 61.01, N = 3 6163.96 MIN: 6045.16 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
RAMspeed SMP Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 14.84, N = 3 17769.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 46.07, N = 3 18388.89 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 47.50, N = 3 18836.90 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 95.27, N = 3 17914.34 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
Chia Blockchain VDF Test: Square Plain C++ OpenBenchmarking.org IPS, More Is Better Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 Test: Square Plain C++ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 611.01, N = 3 95200 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -no-pie -lgmpxx -lgmp -lboost_system -pthread
RAMspeed SMP Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 25.93, N = 3 18332.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
libgav1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 38.80 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lrt
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 15.34, N = 3 5772.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 35.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.0743 0.1486 0.2229 0.2972 0.3715 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.33
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 6.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.0743 0.1486 0.2229 0.2972 0.3715 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.33
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 2.52, N = 3 3781.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
libgav1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 98.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lrt
RAMspeed SMP Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 94.73, N = 3 17807.62 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 15.47, N = 3 20323.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 57.61, N = 3 19264.94 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 43.40, N = 3 20084.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
RAMspeed SMP Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer 2023-01-19 04:50 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 133.19, N = 3 18843.10 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 31.48, N = 3 3393.93 MIN: 3323.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 25.88, N = 3 3364.45 MIN: 3296.18 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 24.00, N = 3 3351.30 MIN: 3292.8 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.029 0.058 0.087 0.116 0.145 SE +/- 0.0015, N = 4 0.1288 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.029 0.058 0.087 0.116 0.145 SE +/- 0.0014, N = 4 0.1291 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
miniBUDE Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 OpenBenchmarking.org Billion Interactions/s, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.15, N = 4 13.05 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -Ofast -ffast-math -fopenmp -march=native -lm
miniBUDE Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 OpenBenchmarking.org GFInst/s, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 3.66, N = 4 326.31 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -Ofast -ffast-math -fopenmp -march=native -lm
Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.0451 0.0902 0.1353 0.1804 0.2255 SE +/- 0.00088128, N = 3 0.20044505
Timed Wasmer Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 80.75 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -ldl -lgcc_s -lutil -lrt -lpthread -lm -lc -pie -nodefaultlibs
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: SP.B OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 4.57, N = 3 4438.95 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 42.74, N = 3 68906 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 76.41 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops -fopenmp
Xcompact3d Incompact3d Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 74.14 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -O2 -funroll-loops -floop-optimize -fcray-pointer -fbacktrace -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 73.73 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Chia Blockchain VDF Test: Square Assembly Optimized OpenBenchmarking.org IPS, More Is Better Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 Test: Square Assembly Optimized 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 503.32, N = 3 122300 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -no-pie -lgmpxx -lgmp -lboost_system -pthread
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 25.31, N = 15 3575.78 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
NAMD ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.2506 0.5012 0.7518 1.0024 1.253 SE +/- 0.00157, N = 3 1.11357
rav1e Speed: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 Speed: 1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.065 0.13 0.195 0.26 0.325 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.289
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 8.73 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
PJSIP Method: INVITE OpenBenchmarking.org Responses Per Second, More Is Better PJSIP 2.11 Method: INVITE 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 4313 1. (CC) gcc options: -lSDL2 -lv4l2 -lvpx -lstdc++ -lopus -lssl -lcrypto -luuid -lm -lrt -lpthread -lasound -lopencore-amrnb -lopencore-amrwb -O2
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 8.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Crypto++ Test: Unkeyed Algorithms OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/second, More Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 269.16 1. (CXX) g++ options: -g2 -O3 -fPIC -pthread -pipe
PJSIP Method: OPTIONS, Stateful OpenBenchmarking.org Responses Per Second, More Is Better PJSIP 2.11 Method: OPTIONS, Stateful 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 61.19, N = 3 7017 1. (CC) gcc options: -lSDL2 -lv4l2 -lvpx -lstdc++ -lopus -lssl -lcrypto -luuid -lm -lrt -lpthread -lasound -lopencore-amrnb -lopencore-amrwb -O2
LuxCoreRender Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.6188 1.2376 1.8564 2.4752 3.094 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 2.75 MIN: 2.7 / MAX: 2.78
LuxCoreRender Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.2993 0.5986 0.8979 1.1972 1.4965 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.33 MIN: 0.36 / MAX: 1.69
LuxCoreRender Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.3285 0.657 0.9855 1.314 1.6425 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 1.46 MIN: 0.4 / MAX: 1.88
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0161 0.0322 0.0483 0.0644 0.0805 SE +/- 0.0002, N = 3 0.0714 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0241 0.0482 0.0723 0.0964 0.1205 SE +/- 0.0003, N = 3 0.1069 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0198 0.0396 0.0594 0.0792 0.099 SE +/- 0.0012, N = 3 0.0880 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0187 0.0374 0.0561 0.0748 0.0935 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0829 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0321 0.0642 0.0963 0.1284 0.1605 SE +/- 0.0019, N = 3 0.1426 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0337 0.0674 0.1011 0.1348 0.1685 SE +/- 0.0006, N = 3 0.1498 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0313 0.0626 0.0939 0.1252 0.1565 SE +/- 0.0016, N = 3 0.1391 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 2023-01-18 21:59 0.022 0.044 0.066 0.088 0.11 SE +/- 0.0005, N = 3 0.0976 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0227 0.0454 0.0681 0.0908 0.1135 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.1007 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 2023-01-18 21:59 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 SE +/- 0.0007, N = 3 0.1333 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0226 0.0452 0.0678 0.0904 0.113 SE +/- 0.0005, N = 3 0.1005 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0204 0.0408 0.0612 0.0816 0.102 SE +/- 0.0006, N = 3 0.0906 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 40 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0148 0.0296 0.0444 0.0592 0.074 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0658 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0147 0.0294 0.0441 0.0588 0.0735 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0655 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0216 0.0432 0.0648 0.0864 0.108 SE +/- 0.0007, N = 3 0.0960 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0209 0.0418 0.0627 0.0836 0.1045 SE +/- 0.0003, N = 3 0.0928 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0118 0.0236 0.0354 0.0472 0.059 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0525 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0113 0.0226 0.0339 0.0452 0.0565 SE +/- 0.0005, N = 3 0.0504 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0107 0.0214 0.0321 0.0428 0.0535 SE +/- 0.0002, N = 3 0.0477 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0106 0.0212 0.0318 0.0424 0.053 SE +/- 0.0001, N = 3 0.0472 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads OpenBenchmarking.org us - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is Better pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads 2023-01-18 21:59 0.0102 0.0204 0.0306 0.0408 0.051 SE +/- 0.0000, N = 3 0.0454 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 10.99, N = 3 2767.31 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
FLAC Audio Encoding WAV To FLAC OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 WAV To FLAC 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.23, N = 5 36.84 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fvisibility=hidden -lm
LuxCoreRender Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.4253 0.8506 1.2759 1.7012 2.1265 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 1.89 MIN: 1.82 / MAX: 1.94
oneDNN Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.3276 2.6552 3.9828 5.3104 6.638 SE +/- 0.78217, N = 15 5.90042 MIN: 2.25 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
Pennant Test: sedovbig OpenBenchmarking.org Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 60.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
C-Ray Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 59.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 89.14, N = 3 174679.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org sign/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 0.74, N = 3 2638.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
GraphicsMagick Operation: HWB Color Space OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: HWB Color Space 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 10.82, N = 3 885 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -llcms2 -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lzstd -lm -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Enhanced OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Enhanced 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 209 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -llcms2 -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lzstd -lm -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Sharpen OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Sharpen 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 193 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -llcms2 -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lzstd -lm -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Noise-Gaussian OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Noise-Gaussian 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 2.52, N = 3 309 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -llcms2 -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lzstd -lm -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Swirl OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Swirl 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 524 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -llcms2 -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lzstd -lm -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Rotate OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Rotate 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 5.36, N = 3 586 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -llcms2 -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lzstd -lm -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Resizing OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Resizing 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 3.00, N = 3 1168 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -llcms2 -ltiff -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lzstd -lm -lpthread
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: FT.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 15.72, N = 3 6936.26 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.59, N = 3 286.17 MIN: 279.46 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 59.59 MIN: 58.7 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 10.31 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.0004 0.0008 0.0012 0.0016 0.002 SE +/- 0.00001764, N = 3 0.00172632
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 17.20 MIN: 17.1 / MAX: 17.44
Timed FFmpeg Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 56.34
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 17.92 MIN: 17.77 / MAX: 18.23
QMCPACK Input: simple-H2O OpenBenchmarking.org Total Execution Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.13 Input: simple-H2O 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 55.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -finline-limit=1000 -fstrict-aliasing -funroll-all-loops -ffast-math -march=native -O3 -lm
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 33.73, N = 15 4854.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
GNU MPC Multi-Precision Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Global Score, More Is Better GNU MPC 1.1.0 Multi-Precision Benchmark 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 41.77, N = 3 6227 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -O2 -pedantic -fomit-frame-pointer -m64 -mtune=sandybridge -march=sandybridge -MT -MD -MP -MF
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 2.06, N = 3 2105.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 36.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
m-queens Time To Solve OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 50.85 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -O2 -march=native
lzbench Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 97 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 33 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
PJSIP Method: OPTIONS, Stateless OpenBenchmarking.org Responses Per Second, More Is Better PJSIP 2.11 Method: OPTIONS, Stateless 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 342.42, N = 3 42499 1. (CC) gcc options: -lSDL2 -lv4l2 -lvpx -lstdc++ -lopus -lssl -lcrypto -luuid -lm -lrt -lpthread -lasound -lopencore-amrnb -lopencore-amrwb -O2
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Threads: All OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 CPU Threads: All 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.39, N = 3 123.00
LibRaw Post-Processing Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Mpix/sec, More Is Better LibRaw 0.20 Post-Processing Benchmark 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 26.04 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -fopenmp -ljpeg -lm
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 24976.61, N = 15 969431
Etcpak Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: ETC2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 296.47 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
QuantLib OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better QuantLib 1.21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 16.57, N = 3 1597.8 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic
rav1e Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 Speed: 10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.9765 1.953 2.9295 3.906 4.8825 SE +/- 0.043, N = 6 4.340
Etcpak Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 1.0 Benchmark: Multi-Threaded - Configuration: DXT1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 297.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
rav1e Speed: 5 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 Speed: 5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.2959 0.5918 0.8877 1.1836 1.4795 SE +/- 0.007, N = 3 1.315
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 23765.65, N = 15 997032
7-Zip Compression Test: Decompression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 236.55, N = 3 93600 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
7-Zip Compression Test: Compression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 271.94, N = 3 103020 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
C-Blosc Test: blosclz bitshuffle OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz bitshuffle 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 28.11, N = 3 5328.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -lrt -lm
AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 41.72 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -O3
Timed Apache Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 41.25
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 3.40, N = 3 2451.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3, Long Mode - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 9.44, N = 3 819.6 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 24.47, N = 3 2105.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Java SciMark Computational Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 5.50, N = 4 1731.02
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 15.95 MIN: 15.69 / MAX: 16.28
Timed MPlayer Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 39.43
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 2467.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8, Long Mode - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 1.91, N = 3 701.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma -llz4
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 6.64, N = 3 6086.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 9.30, N = 3 5265.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.54 MIN: 16.35 / MAX: 16.84
miniFE Problem Size: Small OpenBenchmarking.org CG Mflops, More Is Better miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Small 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 88.37, N = 3 8821.67 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 2.31, N = 3 454.52 MIN: 448.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 21794.83, N = 15 1205781
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 51.63, N = 5 4769.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 54.75 MIN: 52.79 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 246.13 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 10954.98, N = 15 1245243
Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 35.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Pennant Test: leblancbig OpenBenchmarking.org Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 35.55 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 35.91 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Parallel BZIP2 Compression FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img Compression OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.13 FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.072, N = 15 6.979 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -pthread -lbz2 -lpthread
Timed ImageMagick Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 34.70
rav1e Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 Speed: 6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.3913 0.7826 1.1739 1.5652 1.9565 SE +/- 0.017, N = 3 1.739
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 18.81 MIN: 18.63 / MAX: 19.19
lzbench Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 427 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 96 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 18154.53, N = 15 1369849
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 13284.05, N = 15 1400303
Botan Test: AES-256 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 10.67, N = 3 2247.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: AES-256 OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 11.55, N = 3 2249.23 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Cython Benchmark Test: N-Queens OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 31.83
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 22921.16, N = 15 1423173
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.28, N = 15 13.61 MIN: 7.46 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 20.41 MIN: 20.15 / MAX: 20.77
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.25, N = 15 24.35 MIN: 16.92 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 24143.03, N = 15 1456508
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 19.54 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 11867.32, N = 15 1468795
Botan Test: Blowfish - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 287.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 283.24 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Twofish - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 242.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Twofish OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 246.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 7051.60, N = 9 894830
Botan Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 406.71 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 409.97 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
LAME MP3 Encoding WAV To MP3 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 8 11.31 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fschedule-insns2 -fbranch-count-reg -fforce-addr -pipe -lncurses -lm
Botan Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 104.16 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: CAST-256 OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.14, N = 3 104.17 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: KASUMI - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 71.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: KASUMI OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 74.64 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 12657.69, N = 15 1518852
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 43.57, N = 3 3547.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
libgav1 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better libgav1 0.17 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 127.98 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lrt
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 14659.06, N = 15 1598981
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 332.46 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
Coremark CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 563.63, N = 3 548071.49 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt
LuaJIT Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.49, N = 3 1102.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
lzbench Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 1138 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 528 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 149 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Super Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 25.26 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
lzbench Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 456 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 371 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 843 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 176 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 100M 200M 300M 400M 500M SE +/- 213821.91, N = 3 487410933 1. (CC) gcc options: -lparcsr_ls -lparcsr_mv -lseq_mv -lIJ_mv -lkrylov -lHYPRE_utilities -lm -fopenmp -lmpi
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - Stream-Triad Like 2023-01-18 00:49 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 75.75, N = 3 70345.1
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 1:1 Reads-Writes 2023-01-18 00:49 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 155.70, N = 3 61036.9
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 2:1 Reads-Writes 2023-01-18 00:49 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 209.73, N = 3 68893.0
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - 3:1 Reads-Writes 2023-01-18 00:49 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 18.27, N = 3 71313.5
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Peak Injection Bandwidth - All Reads 2023-01-18 00:49 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 10.60, N = 3 78161.3
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 157.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
lzbench Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 1207 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
lzbench Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 366 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -fstrict-aliasing -ffast-math -O3
C-Blosc Test: blosclz shuffle OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.3 Test: blosclz shuffle 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 19.36, N = 3 10291.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -lrt -lm
Mencoder AVI To LAVC OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Mencoder 1.3.0 AVI To LAVC 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 22.13 1. (CC) gcc options: -ffast-math -fpie -pie -lncurses -lrt -lpng -lz -ljpeg -lbz2 -llzo2 -lvorbisenc -lvorbis -logg -rdynamic -lm
ArrayFire Test: Conjugate Gradient CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better ArrayFire 3.7 Test: Conjugate Gradient CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.47, N = 15 16.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -rdynamic
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 10.58 MIN: 9.6 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
ArrayFire Test: BLAS CPU OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOPS, More Is Better ArrayFire 3.7 Test: BLAS CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 3.32, N = 4 786.98 1. (CXX) g++ options: -rdynamic
oneDNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 10.00 MIN: 9.59 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
Primesieve Length: 1e12 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 8.0 Length: 1e12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 20.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradesoap OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 35.51, N = 4 5092
LuxCoreRender Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.6 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 7.69 MIN: 7.62 / MAX: 7.79
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 132.59, N = 15 18608 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.19, N = 4 34.27 MIN: 32.03 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.0955 2.191 3.2865 4.382 5.4775 SE +/- 0.00953, N = 4 4.86872 MIN: 4.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
Liquid-DSP Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4M 8M 12M 16M 20M SE +/- 41186.57, N = 3 20848000 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
ebizzy OpenBenchmarking.org Records/s, More Is Better ebizzy 0.3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 5220.62, N = 3 480762 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lpthread -O3 -march=native
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 745.03, N = 4 634940
Kvazaar Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 39.70 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -ftree-vectorize -fvisibility=hidden -O2 -lpthread -lm -lrt
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.1197 2.2394 3.3591 4.4788 5.5985 SE +/- 0.02322, N = 4 4.97658 MIN: 4.85 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.0483 2.0966 3.1449 4.1932 5.2415 SE +/- 0.03286, N = 4 4.65906 MIN: 4.3 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
Liquid-DSP Threads: 40 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 40 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 100M 200M 300M 400M 500M SE +/- 286763.55, N = 3 482050000 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 32 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 32 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90M 180M 270M 360M 450M SE +/- 1685084.90, N = 3 427003333 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 60M 120M 180M 240M 300M SE +/- 726918.92, N = 3 274363333 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 30M 60M 90M 120M 150M SE +/- 272213.15, N = 3 143850000 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 16M 32M 48M 64M 80M SE +/- 298123.20, N = 3 76182667 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8M 16M 24M 32M 40M SE +/- 317512.73, N = 3 39569000 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradebeans OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 37.87, N = 4 7386
Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 19.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: MG.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 10.35, N = 3 8770.48 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 4 14.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
Helsing Digit Range: 12 digit OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 12 digit 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.8557 1.7114 2.5671 3.4228 4.2785 SE +/- 0.047, N = 15 3.803 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.92 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 2000.84, N = 4 634269
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 2327.69, N = 5 881643
Timed MAFFT Alignment Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.16, N = 4 14.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -O3 -lm -lpthread
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 7.82, N = 4 5012.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1794.80, N = 5 819687
Xcompact3d Incompact3d Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 17.00 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -O2 -funroll-loops -floop-optimize -fcray-pointer -fbacktrace -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 35.20, N = 3 15595 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 5 10.40 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
Bork File Encrypter File Encryption Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 5 10.38
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 6974.86, N = 5 871455
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 3778.56, N = 5 873506
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 1461.37, N = 6 1219637
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Jython OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 23.73, N = 6 6130
Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.022, N = 5 9.959 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: H2 OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 29.84, N = 5 4403
LULESH OpenBenchmarking.org z/s, More Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 20.06, N = 5 5469.19 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp -lm -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 3173.20, N = 4 736147
oneDNN Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.5189 1.0378 1.5567 2.0756 2.5945 SE +/- 0.02065, N = 4 2.30625 MIN: 2.05 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 3026.31, N = 6 1289164
PolyBench-C Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.7153 1.4306 2.1459 2.8612 3.5765 SE +/- 0.085, N = 15 3.179 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenJPEG Encode: NASA Curiosity Panorama M34 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenJPEG 2.4 Encode: NASA Curiosity Panorama M34 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 244.32, N = 6 94341 1. (CXX) g++ options: -rdynamic
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01391, N = 5 8.03746 MIN: 7.9 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1639.52, N = 5 1086971
IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 4782.47, N = 6 1346662
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.5025 1.005 1.5075 2.01 2.5125 SE +/- 0.01188, N = 5 2.23329 MIN: 1.86 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 1.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.31, N = 6 486.22 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lm
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.025, N = 5 8.938 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 54.10, N = 7 18527 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.44, N = 5 1005.35 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 10, Lossless OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 Encoder Speed: 10, Lossless 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.041, N = 5 8.574 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
Intel Memory Latency Checker Test: Idle Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 Test: Idle Latency 2023-01-18 00:49 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.06, N = 7 70.6
IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 12950.77, N = 7 1495301
Bullet Physics Engine Test: 3000 Fall OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 3000 Fall 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.1167 2.2334 3.3501 4.4668 5.5835 SE +/- 0.008448, N = 7 4.963265 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lglut -lGL -lGLU
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 5.44, N = 7 5011.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
PolyBench-C Test: Correlation Computation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Correlation Computation 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.6073 1.2146 1.8219 2.4292 3.0365 SE +/- 0.093, N = 15 2.699 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
PolyBench-C Test: Covariance Computation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Covariance Computation 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.5857 1.1714 1.7571 2.3428 2.9285 SE +/- 0.091, N = 15 2.603 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: Rhodopsin Protein OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: Rhodopsin Protein 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.194, N = 15 9.050 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lm -ldl
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 7.32, N = 8 5474.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 96.87, N = 7 15398 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.2074 2.4148 3.6222 4.8296 6.037 SE +/- 0.019, N = 7 5.366 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 42.80, N = 8 19980 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 53.66, N = 8 19554 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
MBW Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 28.05, N = 10 3656.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.1603 2.3206 3.4809 4.6412 5.8015 SE +/- 0.010, N = 7 5.157 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 7.18, N = 8 4917.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 7.55, N = 7 5181.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 61.32, N = 15 9422.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 83.33, N = 8 16083 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 115.40, N = 9 13958 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.22, N = 9 73.70 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -static -pthread -lrt
Timed CPython Compilation Build Configuration: Default OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 Build Configuration: Default 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 32.35
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 63.56, N = 9 17556 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.7826 1.5652 2.3478 3.1304 3.913 SE +/- 0.012, N = 9 3.478 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 5.65, N = 8 5570.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.04, N = 8 81.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -static -pthread -lrt
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 4.80, N = 9 6185.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 70.19, N = 9 20280 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 63.84, N = 8 14704 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.04, N = 8 75.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -static -pthread -lrt
Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.7679 1.5358 2.3037 3.0716 3.8395 SE +/- 0.013, N = 9 3.413 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 19.91, N = 9 6356.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 2.06, N = 9 5499.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Nettle Test: aes256 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.8 Test: aes256 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 4.33, N = 8 1381.15 MIN: 1142.52 / MAX: 1889.75 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lgmp -lm -lcrypto
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 7.91, N = 8 5269.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 16.94, N = 9 5147.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.16, N = 9 71.37 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -static -pthread -lrt
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.10, N = 9 28.65 MIN: 27.47 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
oneDNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 9 11.93 MIN: 11.84 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 65.29, N = 10 19833 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
oneDNN MKL-DNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 9 11.96 MIN: 11.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -ldl
MBW Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB 2023-01-18 08:41 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 31.62, N = 10 4770.60 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
oneDNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.2494 2.4988 3.7482 4.9976 6.247 SE +/- 0.00785, N = 9 5.55297 MIN: 5.51 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl
Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride OpenBenchmarking.org ns, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.034, N = 9 6.564 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -static -pthread -lrt
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 4.28, N = 10 5775.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTE N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 166.60, N = 10 49494.59 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fopenmp
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 9.97, N = 10 5451.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 30.38, N = 11 6034.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Nettle Test: sha512 OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.8 Test: sha512 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.66, N = 10 404.22 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lgmp -lm -lcrypto
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 56.67, N = 11 20488 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
Nettle Test: chacha OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.8 Test: chacha 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.65, N = 12 813.26 MIN: 395.66 / MAX: 2267.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lgmp -lm -lcrypto
BLAKE2 OpenBenchmarking.org Cycles Per Byte, Fewer Is Better BLAKE2 20170307 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.1205 2.241 3.3615 4.482 5.6025 SE +/- 0.03, N = 14 4.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lcrypto -lz
Nettle Test: poly1305-aes OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.8 Test: poly1305-aes 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 7.93, N = 15 2246.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lgmp -lm -lcrypto
Java Graphics Basic Acceptance Test OpenBenchmarking.org Java Graphics Basic Acceptance Test 2.0 FAIL 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1
RELION System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 13 26 39 52 65 Min: 34 / Avg: 61.29 / Max: 66
RELION CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 24 / Avg: 55.26 / Max: 60
rav1e System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 45.56 / Max: 49
rav1e CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 31 / Avg: 37.46 / Max: 42
rav1e System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 43.32 / Max: 50
rav1e CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 29 / Avg: 33.74 / Max: 41
rav1e System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 44.67 / Max: 49
rav1e CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 29 / Avg: 33.13 / Max: 42
rav1e System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 42.2 / Max: 46
rav1e CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 31 / Max: 35
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 44.35 / Max: 47
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.78 / Max: 33
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.6 / Max: 47
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.49 / Max: 35
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 44.22 / Max: 47
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.38 / Max: 34
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 46 / Max: 47
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 32.66 / Max: 34
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 44.43 / Max: 47
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 32.59 / Max: 34
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 44.66 / Max: 48
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 32.69 / Max: 34
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 44.27 / Max: 47
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 33.05 / Max: 34
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 44.03 / Max: 48
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 33.61 / Max: 35
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.21 / Max: 45
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 32 / Avg: 34.55 / Max: 36
RAMspeed SMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 42 / Avg: 46.06 / Max: 49
RAMspeed SMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-19 04:50 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 32 / Avg: 34.83 / Max: 36
QuantLib System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better QuantLib 1.21 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 50.47 / Max: 53
QuantLib CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 37 / Max: 40
QMCPACK System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.13 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 58.77 / Max: 61
QMCPACK CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 38 / Avg: 52.73 / Max: 56
Quantum ESPRESSO System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 7.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 46 / Avg: 60.54 / Max: 63
Quantum ESPRESSO CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 7.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 35 / Avg: 55.09 / Max: 59
Primesieve System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 8.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 43 / Avg: 55 / Max: 60
Primesieve CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 8.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 34 / Avg: 48.4 / Max: 55
PolyBench-C System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 41.31 / Max: 47
PolyBench-C CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.15 / Max: 31
PolyBench-C System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 43.08 / Max: 47
PolyBench-C CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 31.85 / Max: 33
PolyBench-C System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 45.08 / Max: 51
PolyBench-C CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PolyBench-C 4.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 33 / Avg: 34.08 / Max: 35
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 45 / Avg: 50.86 / Max: 57
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 42.57 / Max: 51
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 47 / Avg: 52.93 / Max: 55
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 46.87 / Max: 51
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 45 / Avg: 51.94 / Max: 54
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 45.82 / Max: 48
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 48 / Avg: 53.11 / Max: 55
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 37 / Avg: 47.21 / Max: 49
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 45 / Avg: 52.82 / Max: 56
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 34 / Avg: 46.4 / Max: 51
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 42 / Avg: 49.16 / Max: 51
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 33 / Avg: 42.4 / Max: 45
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 42 / Avg: 47.94 / Max: 50
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 33 / Avg: 40.09 / Max: 43
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 47.86 / Max: 50
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 41.47 / Max: 44
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 46.52 / Max: 48
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 29 / Avg: 38.16 / Max: 41
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 45.12 / Max: 47
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 29 / Avg: 38.6 / Max: 41
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 42.52 / Max: 46
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 35.03 / Max: 39
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 42.92 / Max: 46
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 32.88 / Max: 36
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 43 / Max: 46
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 36.64 / Max: 39
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 41.8 / Max: 45
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.32 / Max: 33
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 41.33 / Max: 44
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29.96 / Max: 32
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 42.6 / Max: 44
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29.96 / Max: 32
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 40.76 / Max: 43
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.96 / Max: 30
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 40.2 / Max: 43
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.76 / Max: 30
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.64 / Max: 42
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 26.63 / Max: 28
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 38.44 / Max: 42
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.44 / Max: 29
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 41.09 / Max: 44
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 26 / Avg: 28.85 / Max: 30
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 42.6 / Max: 44
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.16 / Max: 29
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 41.29 / Max: 43
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.48 / Max: 30
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 41.72 / Max: 43
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 26 / Avg: 28.56 / Max: 30
pmbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 41.08 / Max: 43
pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better pmbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 21:59 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29.24 / Max: 32
PJSIP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PJSIP 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 40.71 / Max: 43
PJSIP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PJSIP 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 32 / Max: 35
PJSIP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PJSIP 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 43.4 / Max: 49
PJSIP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PJSIP 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 28 / Avg: 36.55 / Max: 41
PJSIP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PJSIP 2.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.12 / Max: 42
PJSIP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PJSIP 2.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.88 / Max: 32
Perl Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.5 / Max: 41
Perl Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.83 / Max: 30
Perl Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 37 / Avg: 41.28 / Max: 47
Perl Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Perl Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 33.03 / Max: 39
Pennant System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 43 / Avg: 55.3 / Max: 57
Pennant CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 49.39 / Max: 53
Pennant System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 42 / Avg: 52.36 / Max: 54
Pennant CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 33 / Avg: 44.36 / Max: 48
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 50 / Avg: 58.04 / Max: 63
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 50.72 / Max: 58
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 47 / Avg: 54.72 / Max: 62
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 38 / Avg: 47.17 / Max: 56
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 55.93 / Max: 61
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 43.57 / Max: 55
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 54.5 / Max: 60
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.14 / Max: 54
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 49 / Avg: 54.17 / Max: 58
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 43.33 / Max: 53
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 50 / Avg: 54.64 / Max: 61
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 42 / Avg: 46.14 / Max: 56
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 47 / Avg: 56.65 / Max: 62
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 49.48 / Max: 57
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 46 / Avg: 54.69 / Max: 61
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 47.19 / Max: 56
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 47 / Avg: 52.47 / Max: 60
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 39 / Avg: 45.8 / Max: 57
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 51 / Avg: 54.85 / Max: 60
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 44.23 / Max: 56
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 54.69 / Max: 61
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 46 / Max: 57
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 55.71 / Max: 61
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.57 / Max: 55
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 51 / Avg: 58.23 / Max: 62
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 50.48 / Max: 58
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 48 / Avg: 54.81 / Max: 61
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 45.63 / Max: 56
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 48 / Avg: 53.4 / Max: 61
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 45.87 / Max: 56
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 50 / Avg: 53 / Max: 60
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 44.54 / Max: 55
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 47 / Avg: 53.2 / Max: 60
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 45.13 / Max: 55
OSPRay Studio System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 54.64 / Max: 59
OSPRay Studio CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 34 / Avg: 42 / Max: 55
OSPRay System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 47 / Avg: 55.52 / Max: 62
OSPRay CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 39 / Avg: 49.29 / Max: 59
OSPRay System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 55.4 / Max: 62
OSPRay CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 42 / Avg: 49.63 / Max: 58
OSPRay System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 59.45 / Max: 63
OSPRay CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 40 / Avg: 55.91 / Max: 59
OSPRay System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 57.6 / Max: 62
OSPRay CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 42 / Avg: 47.6 / Max: 57
OSPRay System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 48 / Avg: 56.7 / Max: 62
OSPRay CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 51 / Max: 58
OSPRay System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 45 / Avg: 55.9 / Max: 62
OSPRay CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 35 / Avg: 46 / Max: 55
OpenVKL System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 1.3.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 45 / Avg: 51.13 / Max: 59
OpenVKL CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 1.3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 38 / Avg: 43.94 / Max: 55
OpenVKL System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 1.3.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 49.69 / Max: 58
OpenVKL CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 1.3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 34 / Avg: 42.26 / Max: 55
OpenSSL System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 45 / Avg: 53.71 / Max: 59
OpenSSL CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 34 / Avg: 45.57 / Max: 53
OpenJPEG System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenJPEG 2.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 40.71 / Max: 44
OpenJPEG CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenJPEG 2.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 29 / Avg: 32 / Max: 38
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 56.43 / Max: 60
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 38 / Avg: 46.14 / Max: 54
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 50 / Avg: 55.43 / Max: 59
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 38 / Avg: 49.29 / Max: 54
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 50 / Avg: 56.43 / Max: 59
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 39 / Avg: 44.57 / Max: 55
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 49 / Avg: 55 / Max: 59
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 49.13 / Max: 55
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 46 / Avg: 53.38 / Max: 58
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 46.5 / Max: 55
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 50 / Max: 57
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 30 / Avg: 47.13 / Max: 53
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 42 / Avg: 47.62 / Max: 52
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 34 / Avg: 41.28 / Max: 47
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 43 / Avg: 50.67 / Max: 55
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 47.8 / Max: 52
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 43 / Avg: 45.8 / Max: 51
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.2 / Max: 44
oneDNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 43 / Avg: 45.11 / Max: 47
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 40 / Max: 49
Intel Open Image Denoise System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 42 / Avg: 53.07 / Max: 60
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 33 / Avg: 46.58 / Max: 56
Intel Open Image Denoise System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 51.36 / Max: 58
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 32 / Avg: 44.81 / Max: 53
Intel Open Image Denoise System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 37 / Avg: 49.83 / Max: 58
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 27 / Avg: 41.97 / Max: 52
Numpy Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Numpy Benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.85 / Max: 44
Numpy Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 26 / Avg: 29.38 / Max: 35
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 45 / Avg: 53.76 / Max: 56
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 46.06 / Max: 51
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 52.67 / Max: 56
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 44.63 / Max: 50
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 54 / Avg: 56.32 / Max: 58
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 37 / Avg: 47.37 / Max: 54
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 46 / Avg: 55.91 / Max: 58
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 48.75 / Max: 52
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 45 / Avg: 56.11 / Max: 58
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 47.48 / Max: 53
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 53.42 / Max: 56
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 47 / Max: 51
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 43 / Avg: 54.19 / Max: 56
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 48.19 / Max: 51
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 45 / Avg: 51.75 / Max: 55
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 43.25 / Max: 48
NAS Parallel Benchmarks System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 53.82 / Max: 57
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 28 / Avg: 47.53 / Max: 51
Nettle System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.13 / Max: 42
Nettle CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.5 / Max: 28
Nettle System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 36.88 / Max: 37
Nettle CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.88 / Max: 28
Nettle System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 38 / Max: 40
Nettle CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.25 / Max: 29
Nettle System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 39.63 / Max: 41
Nettle CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 29.5 / Max: 31
Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 39 / Avg: 39.38 / Max: 40
Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29 / Max: 30
Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 42 / Avg: 43 / Max: 44
Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.13 / Max: 32
Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 39 / Avg: 39.67 / Max: 40
Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 30.89 / Max: 32
Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 40 / Avg: 40.5 / Max: 41
Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 31.75 / Max: 33
Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 41 / Avg: 42 / Max: 44
Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Multichase Pointer Chaser CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 32 / Avg: 33 / Max: 34
ACES DGEMM System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 44 / Avg: 47.61 / Max: 52
ACES DGEMM CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 40.78 / Max: 46
Timed MrBayes Analysis System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 40 / Avg: 56.84 / Max: 59
Timed MrBayes Analysis CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 31 / Avg: 51.36 / Max: 55
GNU MPC System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GNU MPC 1.1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 41.41 / Max: 46
GNU MPC CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GNU MPC 1.1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.68 / Max: 35
Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2019-03-24 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 40 / Avg: 56.12 / Max: 59
Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2019-03-24 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 30 / Avg: 50.26 / Max: 54
oneDNN MKL-DNN System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 48.82 / Max: 55
oneDNN MKL-DNN CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 42.58 / Max: 50
miniBUDE System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 39 / Avg: 55.65 / Max: 60
miniBUDE CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 29 / Avg: 48.77 / Max: 54
miniBUDE System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 48.14 / Max: 53
miniBUDE CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 23 / Avg: 38.13 / Max: 46
Mencoder System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Mencoder 1.3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 36.3 / Max: 38
Mencoder CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Mencoder 1.3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.7 / Max: 27
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 34 / Avg: 39.62 / Max: 42
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.62 / Max: 29
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 34 / Avg: 38.1 / Max: 42
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.24 / Max: 29
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.81 / Max: 41
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.71 / Max: 28
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 34 / Avg: 38.75 / Max: 41
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.29 / Max: 29
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.56 / Max: 40
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.25 / Max: 27
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 40.1 / Max: 42
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.69 / Max: 29
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 34 / Avg: 38.27 / Max: 41
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 26.78 / Max: 29
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.83 / Max: 41
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.67 / Max: 28
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 39.17 / Max: 42
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.94 / Max: 30
MBW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 40.44 / Max: 41
MBW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 08:41 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.2 / Max: 33
Timed MAFFT Alignment System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 39.89 / Max: 43
Timed MAFFT Alignment CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 31.56 / Max: 38
lzbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.64 / Max: 38
lzbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 26.93 / Max: 28
lzbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.5 / Max: 39
lzbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 26.86 / Max: 28
lzbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 38 / Max: 39
lzbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.5 / Max: 28
lzbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 37.91 / Max: 39
lzbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.7 / Max: 28
lzbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.64 / Max: 40
lzbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.18 / Max: 30
lzbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 39.42 / Max: 41
lzbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29.27 / Max: 30
lzbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 40.5 / Max: 41
lzbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better lzbench 1.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 30.6 / Max: 32
LULESH System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 40.88 / Max: 44
LULESH CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 25 / Avg: 28.44 / Max: 31
LuaJIT Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 6.91, N = 3 2110.58 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.28, N = 3 1073.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.22, N = 3 414.51 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 1.74, N = 3 1506.33 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.23, N = 3 407.29 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ldl -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -fno-stack-protector
LuaJIT System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.64 / Max: 39
LuaJIT CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuaJIT 2.1-git CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.18 / Max: 29
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 28 / Avg: 42.29 / Max: 47
Liquid-DSP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 45.67 / Max: 50
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 36.11 / Max: 40
Liquid-DSP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 43.44 / Max: 48
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 27 / Avg: 33.89 / Max: 39
Liquid-DSP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 42.44 / Max: 46
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 27 / Avg: 35 / Max: 41
Liquid-DSP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 41.89 / Max: 44
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 27 / Avg: 31.56 / Max: 38
Liquid-DSP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.22 / Max: 39
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 27 / Avg: 33 / Max: 38
LibRaw System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LibRaw 0.20 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 40.44 / Max: 46
LibRaw CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LibRaw 0.20 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 31.39 / Max: 40
libgav1 System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 43.55 / Max: 48
libgav1 CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 30 / Avg: 34.55 / Max: 39
libgav1 System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 40 / Avg: 42.77 / Max: 45
libgav1 CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 31 / Avg: 34.83 / Max: 38
libgav1 System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.26 / Max: 47
libgav1 CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 31 / Avg: 36.29 / Max: 41
libgav1 System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 40 / Avg: 44 / Max: 46
libgav1 CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libgav1 0.17 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 36 / Max: 38
LeelaChessZero System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 43 / Avg: 56.85 / Max: 61
LeelaChessZero CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 34 / Avg: 51.42 / Max: 56
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 46 / Avg: 58.32 / Max: 60
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 31 / Avg: 53 / Max: 55
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 45.33 / Max: 51
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 36.75 / Max: 45
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 45 / Avg: 53.93 / Max: 57
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 46.8 / Max: 51
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 53.29 / Max: 57
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 48.19 / Max: 51
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 53.61 / Max: 57
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 37 / Avg: 47.3 / Max: 52
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 51 / Avg: 55.63 / Max: 58
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 50.17 / Max: 53
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 53.5 / Max: 57
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 31 / Avg: 47.66 / Max: 51
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 44.88 / Max: 50
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 39 / Max: 44
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 46.56 / Max: 50
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 31 / Avg: 37.4 / Max: 44
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 45.92 / Max: 50
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 30 / Avg: 39.77 / Max: 45
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 42 / Avg: 47.65 / Max: 51
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 28 / Avg: 38.12 / Max: 42
Kvazaar System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 45.74 / Max: 49
Kvazaar CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Kvazaar 2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 26 / Avg: 37.11 / Max: 42
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 43.13 / Max: 47
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 31.25 / Max: 38
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.21 / Max: 37
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.83 / Max: 27
JPEG XL libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 33 / Avg: 38.52 / Max: 45
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 24 / Avg: 28.23 / Max: 38
JPEG XL libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 39.2 / Max: 45
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 28 / Avg: 33.2 / Max: 43
JPEG XL libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 40.07 / Max: 45
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 27 / Avg: 32.28 / Max: 42
JPEG XL libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 34 / Avg: 37.94 / Max: 46
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 24 / Avg: 27.56 / Max: 38
JPEG XL libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 39.24 / Max: 45
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 27 / Avg: 30.73 / Max: 41
JPEG XL libjxl System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 40.44 / Max: 46
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 26 / Avg: 31.47 / Max: 42
Java SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 28.69, N = 4 3703.27
Java SciMark Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.76, N = 4 1513.21
Java SciMark Computational Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.21, N = 4 850.07
Java SciMark Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.15, N = 4 1501.77
Java SciMark Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 3.91, N = 4 1086.80
Java SciMark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.59 / Max: 38
Java SciMark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.24 / Max: 26
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.5 / Max: 38
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.33 / Max: 38
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.56 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 35.38 / Max: 36
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.5 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 35.33 / Max: 37
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.78 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.22 / Max: 38
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.89 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.67 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.78 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.4 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.89 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 37 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.25 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37 / Max: 38
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.33 / Max: 26
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.44 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27 / Max: 28
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.11 / Max: 38
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 26.56 / Max: 27
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 36.81 / Max: 42
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 26.81 / Max: 28
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.19 / Max: 38
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27 / Max: 28
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.23 / Max: 38
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27 / Max: 28
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.6 / Max: 38
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.3 / Max: 28
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 36.89 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.74 / Max: 28
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.44 / Max: 28
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 37.61 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.84 / Max: 29
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.2 / Max: 39
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.12 / Max: 29
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 38 / Avg: 38.73 / Max: 40
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.76 / Max: 30
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 40.65 / Max: 43
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 31.9 / Max: 34
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 40 / Avg: 41.95 / Max: 45
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 31 / Avg: 33.26 / Max: 35
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 41 / Avg: 43.16 / Max: 46
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 35 / Max: 41
IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 42 / Avg: 44.5 / Max: 50
IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IPC_benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.67 / Max: 39
Intel Memory Latency Checker System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 00:49 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 45 / Avg: 46.6 / Max: 48
Intel Memory Latency Checker CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 00:49 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.78 / Max: 41
Intel Memory Latency Checker System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 00:49 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 48 / Avg: 56.12 / Max: 58
Intel Memory Latency Checker CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 00:49 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 50.46 / Max: 54
Intel Memory Latency Checker System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 System Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 00:49 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 52 / Avg: 54.5 / Max: 56
Intel Memory Latency Checker CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Memory Latency Checker 3.10 CPU Temperature Monitor 2023-01-18 00:49 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 46 / Max: 51
Xcompact3d Incompact3d System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 52 / Avg: 59.5 / Max: 63
Xcompact3d Incompact3d CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 38 / Avg: 54.27 / Max: 59
Xcompact3d Incompact3d System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 53.5 / Max: 56
Xcompact3d Incompact3d CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 46.82 / Max: 50
Xcompact3d Incompact3d System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 49.57 / Max: 53
Xcompact3d Incompact3d CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 34 / Avg: 42 / Max: 46
High Performance Conjugate Gradient System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 35 / Avg: 51.35 / Max: 56
High Performance Conjugate Gradient CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 25 / Avg: 44.99 / Max: 49
Timed HMMer Search System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed HMMer Search 3.3.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 55.31 / Max: 57
Timed HMMer Search CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed HMMer Search 3.3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 33 / Avg: 49.22 / Max: 54
Himeno Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 43 / Avg: 44.4 / Max: 47
Himeno Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 36.28 / Max: 39
Helsing System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 44 / Avg: 59.08 / Max: 63
Helsing CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 53.5 / Max: 58
Helsing System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 43 / Avg: 45.75 / Max: 55
Helsing CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 35 / Avg: 39.44 / Max: 50
Hackbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 43 / Avg: 46 / Max: 51
Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 38.5 / Max: 46
Hackbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 43 / Avg: 47.75 / Max: 52
Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hackbench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 40.25 / Max: 46
GraphicsMagick System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 40 / Avg: 42.28 / Max: 46
GraphicsMagick CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 31 / Avg: 33.67 / Max: 37
GraphicsMagick System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 43 / Avg: 49.14 / Max: 54
GraphicsMagick CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 30 / Avg: 42.38 / Max: 49
GraphicsMagick System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 37 / Avg: 43.5 / Max: 47
GraphicsMagick CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 33.06 / Max: 37
GNU GMP GMPbench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.32 / Max: 47
GNU GMP GMPbench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 27 / Avg: 31.35 / Max: 41
Gcrypt Library System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Gcrypt Library 1.9 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.94 / Max: 40
Gcrypt Library CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Gcrypt Library 1.9 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.91 / Max: 29
Fhourstones System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Fhourstones 3.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 44.5 / Max: 46
Fhourstones CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Fhourstones 3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 31.38 / Max: 33
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 41.72 / Max: 47
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 29.56 / Max: 32
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 39.15 / Max: 43
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 26 / Avg: 28.25 / Max: 30
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.89 / Max: 42
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.5 / Max: 29
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 38 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.13 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.88 / Max: 38
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 27 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.25 / Max: 37
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 26 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 38 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.44 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 37.38 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.75 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 38.44 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.44 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.25 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.88 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 37.5 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.5 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 34 / Avg: 38.44 / Max: 41
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 26 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 39.69 / Max: 41
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 24.87 / Max: 26
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.22 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.44 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38 / Max: 43
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.75 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.5 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.05 / Max: 41
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.53 / Max: 29
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.03 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 26.81 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 36.56 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 25.44 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 36.56 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 25 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.78 / Max: 38
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.56 / Max: 26
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.75 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.56 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.75 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.75 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.44 / Max: 38
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.33 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 34 / Avg: 36.5 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.75 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 34 / Avg: 34.5 / Max: 35
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.25 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.11 / Max: 38
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.22 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 35.63 / Max: 37
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 25 / Max: 26
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.88 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.89 / Max: 27
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.63 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 24 / Avg: 26.44 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.88 / Max: 39
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 26.78 / Max: 28
FFTW System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.75 / Max: 40
FFTW CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.75 / Max: 29
Etcpak CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 30 / Avg: 38.43 / Max: 44
Etcpak System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 37 / Avg: 45.14 / Max: 50
Etcpak System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.34 / Max: 42
Etcpak CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 23 / Avg: 28.61 / Max: 35
Etcpak System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.74 / Max: 38
Etcpak CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 23 / Avg: 24.98 / Max: 27
LAME MP3 Encoding System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.07 / Max: 39
LAME MP3 Encoding CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.13 / Max: 29
FLAC Audio Encoding System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 39.84 / Max: 42
FLAC Audio Encoding CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.35 / Max: 33
Embree System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 43 / Avg: 45.27 / Max: 53
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 34 / Avg: 36.09 / Max: 47
Embree System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 43.3 / Max: 51
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 30 / Avg: 34 / Max: 45
DeepSpeech System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.55 / Max: 43
DeepSpeech CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 28.58 / Max: 37
dav1d System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 44 / Max: 46
dav1d CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 29 / Avg: 35.47 / Max: 39
dav1d System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 43.33 / Max: 46
dav1d CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 29 / Avg: 34.36 / Max: 38
dav1d System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 36 / Avg: 44.25 / Max: 48
dav1d CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 27 / Avg: 36.57 / Max: 41
dav1d System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 41.13 / Max: 45
dav1d CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 27 / Avg: 31.63 / Max: 36
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 39 / Max: 44
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 31.6 / Max: 36
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.11 / Max: 40
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.89 / Max: 32
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38 / Max: 43
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 25 / Avg: 27.44 / Max: 34
DaCapo Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 38.44 / Max: 42
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 26.89 / Max: 28
Cython Benchmark System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.31 / Max: 38
Cython Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.85 / Max: 27
Crypto++ System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.34 / Max: 40
Crypto++ CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.93 / Max: 30
Crypto++ System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.77 / Max: 41
Crypto++ CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.95 / Max: 29
Crypto++ System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.57 / Max: 42
Crypto++ CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.88 / Max: 32
Crypto++ System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 42.11 / Max: 47
Crypto++ CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Crypto++ 8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.63 / Max: 35
CP2K Molecular Dynamics System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 42 / Avg: 50.37 / Max: 55
CP2K Molecular Dynamics CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 28 / Avg: 43.04 / Max: 47
Core-Latency System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Core-Latency System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 40.63 / Max: 46
Core-Latency CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Core-Latency CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 27 / Avg: 30.55 / Max: 39
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.25 / Max: 49
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 30 / Avg: 33.33 / Max: 36
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 43.84 / Max: 51
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 30 / Avg: 35.16 / Max: 43
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 42 / Max: 47
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 30 / Avg: 32.41 / Max: 38
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 41.58 / Max: 47
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 28 / Avg: 33.11 / Max: 41
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.88 / Max: 45
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 28 / Avg: 31.71 / Max: 38
Zstd Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 42.63 / Max: 45
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 32.06 / Max: 39
XZ Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 46.68 / Max: 50
XZ Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 28 / Avg: 37.94 / Max: 44
Parallel BZIP2 Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.13 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 40.07 / Max: 42
Parallel BZIP2 Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 27 / Avg: 35.2 / Max: 42
LZ4 Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.58 / Max: 39
LZ4 Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.17 / Max: 28
LZ4 Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.3 / Max: 41
LZ4 Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.59 / Max: 31
LZ4 Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.88 / Max: 39
LZ4 Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.63 / Max: 29
Gzip Compression System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Gzip Compression System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.77 / Max: 43
Gzip Compression CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Gzip Compression CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.27 / Max: 34
CLOMP System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CLOMP 1.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.9 / Max: 45
CLOMP CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CLOMP 1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 29.53 / Max: 34
Chia Blockchain VDF System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.79 / Max: 39
Chia Blockchain VDF CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.17 / Max: 29
Chia Blockchain VDF System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.97 / Max: 39
Chia Blockchain VDF CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Chia Blockchain VDF 1.0.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.05 / Max: 29
CacheBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.25 / Max: 41
CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.47 / Max: 30
CacheBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.82 / Max: 41
CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.94 / Max: 31
CacheBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 40.45 / Max: 44
CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CacheBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 30.84 / Max: 33
Bullet Physics Engine Test: Convex Trimesh OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Convex Trimesh 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.3323 0.6646 0.9969 1.3292 1.6615 SE +/- 0.00414, N = 3 1.47690 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lglut -lGL -lGLU
Bullet Physics Engine Test: Prim Trimesh OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Prim Trimesh 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.2699 0.5398 0.8097 1.0796 1.3495 SE +/- 0.000476, N = 3 1.199460 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lglut -lGL -lGLU
Bullet Physics Engine Test: 1000 Convex OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 1000 Convex 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.015757, N = 3 6.058387 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lglut -lGL -lGLU
Bullet Physics Engine Test: 136 Ragdolls OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 136 Ragdolls 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 0.8024 1.6048 2.4072 3.2096 4.012 SE +/- 0.009118, N = 3 3.566150 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lglut -lGL -lGLU
Bullet Physics Engine Test: 1000 Stack OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 1000 Stack 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 1.3266 2.6532 3.9798 5.3064 6.633 SE +/- 0.008611, N = 3 5.896145 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lglut -lGL -lGLU
Bullet Physics Engine System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 41 / Avg: 42.88 / Max: 46
Bullet Physics Engine CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 32 / Avg: 34.22 / Max: 35
Build2 System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.13 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 48.38 / Max: 55
Build2 CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 33 / Avg: 40.15 / Max: 49
Timed Wasmer Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 47 / Max: 51
Timed Wasmer Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 32 / Avg: 38.6 / Max: 46
Timed CPython Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 42 / Avg: 46.68 / Max: 52
Timed CPython Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.67 / Max: 44
Timed CPython Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 43 / Avg: 47.57 / Max: 52
Timed CPython Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed CPython Compilation 3.10.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.29 / Max: 40
Timed Node.js Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 18.8 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 45 / Avg: 54.62 / Max: 60
Timed Node.js Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 18.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 36 / Avg: 46.82 / Max: 55
Timed MPlayer Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 44 / Avg: 49.43 / Max: 57
Timed MPlayer Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.88 / Max: 43
Timed LLVM Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 46 / Avg: 54.49 / Max: 59
Timed LLVM Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 37 / Avg: 47.78 / Max: 54
Timed LLVM Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 47 / Avg: 56.04 / Max: 60
Timed LLVM Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 39 / Avg: 49.02 / Max: 56
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 38 / Avg: 46.75 / Max: 54
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 30 / Avg: 38.88 / Max: 49
Timed ImageMagick Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 42.42 / Max: 49
Timed ImageMagick Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 28 / Avg: 35 / Max: 43
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 38 / Avg: 44.07 / Max: 50
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 28 / Avg: 35.2 / Max: 47
Timed FFmpeg Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 46.27 / Max: 52
Timed FFmpeg Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 28 / Avg: 36.18 / Max: 47
Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 37 / Avg: 42.9 / Max: 51
Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 25.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 28 / Avg: 35.46 / Max: 44
Timed Eigen Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.76 / Max: 41
Timed Eigen Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.48 / Max: 29
Timed Apache Compilation System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 36 / Avg: 40.1 / Max: 45
Timed Apache Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 27 / Avg: 30.75 / Max: 36
Botan System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.38 / Max: 39
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.46 / Max: 28
Botan System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.54 / Max: 39
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.69 / Max: 28
Botan System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.31 / Max: 40
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.08 / Max: 29
Botan System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.38 / Max: 40
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 27 / Avg: 28 / Max: 29
Botan System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 38.38 / Max: 39
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 28.77 / Max: 30
Botan System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 39.46 / Max: 41
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 28 / Avg: 29.07 / Max: 30
Bork File Encrypter System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Bork File Encrypter 1.4 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 38 / Avg: 40.22 / Max: 42
Bork File Encrypter CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Bork File Encrypter 1.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 29 / Avg: 34.78 / Max: 41
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 39 / Avg: 43.47 / Max: 48
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 32 / Avg: 35.06 / Max: 40
C-Blosc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.3 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 40 / Avg: 41.78 / Max: 46
C-Blosc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 30 / Avg: 33.6 / Max: 37
BLAKE2 System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better BLAKE2 20170307 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 39 / Avg: 39.38 / Max: 41
BLAKE2 CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better BLAKE2 20170307 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 30 / Avg: 30.38 / Max: 31
libavif avifenc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 41 / Avg: 43 / Max: 48
libavif avifenc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.57 / Max: 45
libavif avifenc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.94 / Max: 55
libavif avifenc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 33 / Avg: 37.18 / Max: 49
libavif avifenc System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 43 / Avg: 50.61 / Max: 59
libavif avifenc CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 35 / Avg: 41.3 / Max: 55
asmFish System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 40 / Avg: 57.88 / Max: 62
asmFish CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 29 / Avg: 51.25 / Max: 58
ArrayFire System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ArrayFire 3.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 40 / Avg: 43.5 / Max: 50
ArrayFire CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ArrayFire 3.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 30 / Avg: 36.2 / Max: 43
ArrayFire System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ArrayFire 3.7 System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 40 / Avg: 48.9 / Max: 54
ArrayFire CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ArrayFire 3.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 30 / Avg: 41.2 / Max: 47
System Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius System Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #23 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #24 2023-01-18 00:49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #28 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #29 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #30 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #31 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #33 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #34 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #35 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #36 2023-01-18 08:41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #37 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #38 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #39 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #40 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #42 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #43 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #44 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #45 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #46 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #47 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #48 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #51 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #52 2023-01-18 21:59 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #53 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #54 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #55 2023-01-19 04:50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #56 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 35 / Avg: 44.77 / Max: 56 Min: 38 / Avg: 44.17 / Max: 54 Min: 41 / Avg: 47.3 / Max: 59 Min: 39 / Avg: 42.76 / Max: 48 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.24 / Max: 41 Min: 38 / Avg: 55.52 / Max: 62 Min: 46 / Avg: 54.89 / Max: 60 Min: 42 / Avg: 46.7 / Max: 52 Min: 40 / Avg: 42.25 / Max: 46 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.15 / Max: 44 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.9 / Max: 39 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.17 / Max: 41 Min: 37 / Avg: 42.6 / Max: 51 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.94 / Max: 47 Min: 35 / Avg: 38 / Max: 44 Min: 36 / Avg: 43 / Max: 48 Min: 36 / Avg: 43.86 / Max: 53 Min: 33 / Avg: 36.72 / Max: 51 Min: 33 / Avg: 38.19 / Max: 47 Min: 36 / Avg: 37.42 / Max: 40 Min: 37 / Avg: 45.59 / Max: 59 Min: 42 / Avg: 47.65 / Max: 57 Min: 43 / Avg: 53.38 / Max: 63 Min: 44 / Avg: 59.16 / Max: 63 Min: 45 / Avg: 54.42 / Max: 58 Min: 34 / Avg: 38.05 / Max: 50 Min: 34 / Avg: 35.57 / Max: 38 Min: 33 / Avg: 38.6 / Max: 46 Min: 33 / Avg: 36.43 / Max: 47 Min: 35 / Avg: 51.09 / Max: 58 Min: 41 / Avg: 57.8 / Max: 60 Min: 42 / Avg: 56.19 / Max: 61 Min: 39 / Avg: 43.46 / Max: 48 Min: 36 / Avg: 42.68 / Max: 54 Min: 35 / Avg: 37.33 / Max: 39 Min: 36 / Avg: 45.21 / Max: 56 Min: 35 / Avg: 38.22 / Max: 41 Min: 34 / Avg: 38.92 / Max: 42 Min: 36 / Avg: 53.42 / Max: 60 Min: 39 / Avg: 44.77 / Max: 57 Min: 39 / Avg: 40.73 / Max: 44 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.05 / Max: 42 Min: 36 / Avg: 54.68 / Max: 58 Min: 37 / Avg: 51.55 / Max: 60 Min: 40 / Avg: 48.31 / Max: 60 Min: 37 / Avg: 38 / Max: 39 Min: 39 / Avg: 48.92 / Max: 59 Min: 44 / Avg: 50.39 / Max: 59 Min: 45 / Avg: 55.95 / Max: 63 Min: 46 / Avg: 54.72 / Max: 63 Min: 42 / Avg: 44.32 / Max: 49 Min: 42 / Avg: 53.63 / Max: 57 Min: 37 / Avg: 40.05 / Max: 47 Min: 37 / Avg: 40.79 / Max: 49 Min: 35 / Avg: 44.46 / Max: 57 Min: 39 / Avg: 42.95 / Max: 51 Min: 39 / Avg: 52.14 / Max: 60 Min: 41 / Avg: 41.33 / Max: 42 Min: 38 / Avg: 44.46 / Max: 49 Min: 38 / Avg: 43.76 / Max: 50
CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #2 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #5 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #6 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #7 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #8 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #9 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #10 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #11 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #12 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #13 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #14 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #15 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #16 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #17 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #18 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #19 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #20 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #21 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #22 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #23 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #24 2023-01-18 00:49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #25 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #26 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #27 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #28 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #29 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #30 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #31 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #32 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #33 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #34 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #35 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #36 2023-01-18 08:41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #37 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #38 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #39 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #40 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #41 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #42 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #43 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #44 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #45 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #46 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #47 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #48 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #49 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #51 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #52 2023-01-18 21:59 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #53 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #54 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #55 2023-01-19 04:50 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #56 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 27 / Avg: 36.4 / Max: 50 Min: 29 / Avg: 36.57 / Max: 48 Min: 33 / Avg: 38.77 / Max: 55 Min: 30 / Avg: 34.48 / Max: 40 Min: 26 / Avg: 28.21 / Max: 30 Min: 30 / Avg: 49.64 / Max: 57 Min: 37 / Avg: 48.05 / Max: 56 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.69 / Max: 44 Min: 30 / Avg: 33 / Max: 35 Min: 27 / Avg: 29.41 / Max: 33 Min: 27 / Avg: 28.12 / Max: 29 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.5 / Max: 31 Min: 26 / Avg: 33.59 / Max: 43 Min: 26 / Avg: 28.44 / Max: 35 Min: 25 / Avg: 28.08 / Max: 36 Min: 27 / Avg: 34.56 / Max: 41 Min: 27 / Avg: 37.16 / Max: 49 Min: 23 / Avg: 27 / Max: 44 Min: 23 / Avg: 27.13 / Max: 32 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.5 / Max: 28 Min: 28 / Avg: 36.58 / Max: 54 Min: 35 / Avg: 41.3 / Max: 52 Min: 35 / Avg: 47.5 / Max: 58 Min: 34 / Avg: 53.85 / Max: 59 Min: 36 / Avg: 48.07 / Max: 54 Min: 24 / Avg: 28.42 / Max: 41 Min: 24 / Avg: 25.26 / Max: 26 Min: 24 / Avg: 28.88 / Max: 43 Min: 24 / Avg: 26.64 / Max: 38 Min: 26 / Avg: 44.49 / Max: 53 Min: 31 / Avg: 52.36 / Max: 55 Min: 34 / Avg: 50.64 / Max: 56 Min: 30 / Avg: 35.04 / Max: 41 Min: 26 / Avg: 34.51 / Max: 47 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.94 / Max: 29 Min: 27 / Avg: 36.96 / Max: 52 Min: 26 / Avg: 27.93 / Max: 32 Min: 24 / Avg: 27.35 / Max: 33 Min: 23 / Avg: 46.08 / Max: 54 Min: 30 / Avg: 38.01 / Max: 53 Min: 28 / Avg: 31.1 / Max: 34 Min: 26 / Avg: 28.21 / Max: 31 Min: 28 / Avg: 47.11 / Max: 54 Min: 27 / Avg: 44.71 / Max: 56 Min: 30 / Avg: 41.38 / Max: 55 Min: 27 / Avg: 27.47 / Max: 28 Min: 28 / Avg: 42.17 / Max: 53 Min: 34 / Avg: 43.12 / Max: 55 Min: 35 / Avg: 49.65 / Max: 59 Min: 34 / Avg: 46.53 / Max: 58 Min: 33 / Avg: 35.1 / Max: 39 Min: 33 / Avg: 47.48 / Max: 54 Min: 26 / Avg: 30.81 / Max: 39 Min: 27 / Avg: 31.94 / Max: 41 Min: 25 / Avg: 34.97 / Max: 51 Min: 29 / Avg: 32 / Max: 35 Min: 29 / Avg: 44.73 / Max: 55 Min: 33 / Avg: 33.75 / Max: 34 Min: 29 / Avg: 33.02 / Max: 36 Min: 27 / Avg: 34.02 / Max: 42
AOBench System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOBench System Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 35 / Avg: 36.12 / Max: 37
AOBench CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOBench CPU Temperature Monitor 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 #1 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 25 / Avg: 25.94 / Max: 27
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5