AMD Ryzen 9 7950X vs. AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Add another performance-per-dollar value in the table above to see customized performance-per-dollar graphs.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 714 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core had the most wins, coming in first place for 70% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core) was 1.259x the speed of the slowest (AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 24-Cores).

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: RocksDB (Test: Random Fill Sync) at 33.771x, Speedb (Test: Random Fill Sync) at 12.741x, oneDNN (Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU) at 6.754x, oneDNN (Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU) at 6.196x, oneDNN (Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU) at 5.213x, TensorFlow (Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNet) at 4.859x, OpenVINO (Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16 - Device: CPU) at 3.704x, DaCapo Benchmark (Java Test: Tradebeans) at 3.313x, DaCapo Benchmark (Java Test: Tradesoap) at 3.131x, RocksDB (Test: Sequential Fill) at 2.918x.

714 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread