easyWave

The easyWave software allows simulating tsunami generation and propagation in the context of early warning systems. EasyWave supports making use of OpenMP for CPU multi-threading and there are also GPU ports available but not currently incorporated as part of this test profile. The easyWave tsunami generation software is run with one of the example/reference input files for measuring the CPU execution time.

To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark easywave.

Project Site

git.gfz-potsdam.de

Source Repository

git.gfz-potsdam.de

Test Created

14 October 2023

Test Maintainer

Michael Larabel 

Test Type

Processor

Average Install Time

7 Seconds

Average Run Time

10 Minutes, 1 Second

Test Dependencies

C/C++ Compiler Toolchain

Accolades

5k+ Downloads

Supported Platforms

[CLOSE]

Public Result Uploads *Reported Installs **Reported Test Completions **Test Profile Page ViewsOpenBenchmarking.orgEventseasyWave Popularity Statisticspts/easywave2023.102023.112023.122024.012024.022024.032024.045001000150020002500
* Uploading of benchmark result data to OpenBenchmarking.org is always optional (opt-in) via the Phoronix Test Suite for users wishing to share their results publicly.
** Data based on those opting to upload their test results to OpenBenchmarking.org and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform.
Data updated weekly as of 22 April 2024.
120042.7%240034.0%24023.4%Time Option PopularityOpenBenchmarking.org

Revision History

pts/easywave-1.0.0   [View Source]   Sat, 14 Oct 2023 20:15:01 GMT
Initial commit for easyWave tsunami generator.


Performance Metrics

Analyze Test Configuration:

easyWave r34

Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 1200

OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 318 public results since 14 October 2023 with the latest data as of 18 April 2024.

Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.

Component
Percentile Rank
# Compatible Public Results
Seconds (Average)
Mid-Tier
75th
> 39
Median
50th
81
39th
3
136 +/- 1
37th
5
139 +/- 3
30th
4
150 +/- 3
Low-Tier
25th
> 170
20th
3
190 +/- 2
12th
3
237 +/- 20
12th
3
238 +/- 1
OpenBenchmarking.orgDistribution Of Public Results - Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 1200318 Results Range From 21 To 2543 Seconds21721231742252763273784294805315826336847357868378889399901041109211431194124512961347139814491500155116021653170417551806185719081959201020612112216322142265231623672418246925202571306090120150

Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (easyWave r34 - Input: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 1200) has an average run-time of 7 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 3 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMinutesTime Required To Complete BenchmarkInput: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 1200Run-Time714212835Min: 1 / Avg: 6.69 / Max: 30

Based on public OpenBenchmarking.org results, the selected test / test configuration has an average standard deviation of 0.7%.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterAverage Deviation Between RunsInput: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 1200Deviation3691215Min: 0 / Avg: 0.72 / Max: 9

Does It Scale Well With Increasing Cores?

Yes, based on the automated analysis of the collected public benchmark data, this test / test settings does generally scale well with increasing CPU core counts. Data based on publicly available results for this test / test settings, separated by vendor, result divided by the reference CPU clock speed, grouped by matching physical CPU core count, and normalized against the smallest core count tested from each vendor for each CPU having a sufficient number of test samples and statistically significant data.

OpenBenchmarking.orgRelative Core Scaling To BaseeasyWave CPU Core ScalingInput: e2Asean Grid + BengkuluSept2007 Source - Time: 1200681632649648121620

Tested CPU Architectures

This benchmark has been successfully tested on the below mentioned architectures. The CPU architectures listed is where successful OpenBenchmarking.org result uploads occurred, namely for helping to determine if a given test is compatible with various alternative CPU architectures.

CPU Architecture
Kernel Identifier
Verified On
Intel / AMD x86 64-bit
x86_64
(Many Processors)
ARMv8 64-bit
aarch64
ARMv8 Cortex-A76 4-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 128-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-V2 72-Core, Apple M2

Recent Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.org Results Compare

76 Systems - 921 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i9-14900K - ASUS PRIME Z790-P - Intel Device 7a27

SystemRescue 10.01 - 6.1.30-1-lts - X Server 1.21.1.8

1 System - 11 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i9-14900K - ASUS PRIME Z790-P - Intel Device 7a27

SystemRescue 10.01 - 6.1.30-1-lts - X Server 1.21.1.8

1 System - 91 Benchmark Results

2 x AMD EPYC 9684X 96-Core - AMD Titanite_4G - AMD Device 14a4

Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.8.0-11-generic - GNOME Shell 45.3

4 Systems - 125 Benchmark Results

2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592+ - Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid D54Q-2U S6Q-MB-MPS - Intel Device 1bce

Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.5.0-17-generic - GCC 13.2.0

3 Systems - 125 Benchmark Results

2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592+ - Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid D54Q-2U S6Q-MB-MPS - Intel Device 1bce

Fedora Linux 39 - 6.7.6-200.fc39.x86_64 - GCC 13.2.1 20231205

1 System - 125 Benchmark Results

2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592+ - Quanta Cloud QuantaGrid D54Q-2U S6Q-MB-MPS - Intel Device 1bce

Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.5.0-17-generic - GCC 13.2.0

1 System - 1 Benchmark Result

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 - Supermicro X10DRL-i v1.01 - Intel Xeon E7 v4

Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.5.0-21-generic - X Server 1.21.1.4

5 Systems - 587 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i5-14600K - ASUS PRIME Z790-P WIFI - Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH

Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.7.3-060703-generic - GNOME Shell 45.2

1 System - 1253 Benchmark Results

62 Systems - 456 Benchmark Results

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 - Intel S2600CWR - Intel Xeon E7 v4

SystemRescue 10.01 - 6.1.30-1-lts - X Server 1.21.1.8

1 System - 9 Benchmark Results

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 - Intel S2600CWR - Intel Xeon E7 v4

SystemRescue 10.01 - 6.1.30-1-lts - X Server 1.21.1.8

1 System - 494 Benchmark Results

1 System - 109 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-5960X - Gigabyte X99-UD4-CF - Intel Xeon E7 v3

Debian 12 - 6.1.0-11-amd64 - GCC 12.2.0

1 System - 59 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-Core - MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM - AMD Starship

Debian 12 - 6.1.0-15-amd64 - X Server 1.20.11

3 Systems - 23 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7980X 64-Cores - ASUS Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI - AMD Device 14a4

Pop 22.04 - 6.6.6-76060606-generic - GNOME Shell 42.5

Most Popular Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.org Results Compare

3 Systems - 106 Benchmark Results

AMD EPYC 9B14 - Google Compute Engine c3d-standard-8 - Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC

Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.2.0-1018-gcp - 1.3.238

10 Systems - 214 Benchmark Results

2 x AMD EPYC 9254 24-Core - Supermicro H13DSH - 24 x 32 GB DDR5-4800MT

AlmaLinux 9.2 - 5.14.0-284.25.1.el9_2.x86_64 - GCC 11.3.1 20221121

2 Systems - 202 Benchmark Results

3 Systems - 232 Benchmark Results

ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 - GIGABYTE MP32-AR2-00 v01000100 - Ampere Computing LLC Altra PCI Root Complex A

Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.5.0-9-generic - GCC 13.2.0

2 Systems - 246 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i5-12600K - ASUS PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4 - Intel Device 7aa7

Ubuntu 22.04 - 5.19.0-051900rc6daily20220716-generic - GNOME Shell 42.1

2 Systems - 520 Benchmark Results

2 x INTEL XEON PLATINUM 8592+ - Quanta Cloud S6Q-MB-MPS - Intel Device 1bce

Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.5.0-13-generic - GCC 13.2.0

2 Systems - 35 Benchmark Results

2 x AMD EPYC 9684X 96-Core - AMD Titanite_4G - AMD Device 14a4

Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.6.0-060600rc1-generic - GNOME Shell

2 Systems - 35 Benchmark Results

2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H - Quanta Cloud S6Q-MB-MPS - Intel Device 1bce

Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.6.0-rc5-phx-patched - GNOME Shell 45.0

2 Systems - 63 Benchmark Results

Intel Xeon Silver 4216 - TYAN S7100AG2NR - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers

Debian 12 - 6.1.0-11-amd64 - X Server

2 Systems - 33 Benchmark Results

AMD EPYC 7F32 8-Core - ASRockRack EPYCD8 - AMD Starship

Debian 12 - 6.1.0-11-amd64 - X Server

10 Systems - 143 Benchmark Results

2 x AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core - AMD Titanite_4G - AMD Device 14a4

Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.6.0-rc5-phx-patched - GNOME Shell 45.0

4 Systems - 350 Benchmark Results

AMD EPYC 8534P 64-Core - AMD Cinnabar - AMD Device 14a4

Ubuntu 23.10 - 6.5.0-5-generic - GNOME Shell 45.0

62 Systems - 456 Benchmark Results

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 - Intel S2600CWR - Intel Xeon E7 v4

SystemRescue 10.01 - 6.1.30-1-lts - X Server 1.21.1.8

2 Systems - 101 Benchmark Results

Intel Core i7-1065G7 - Dell 06CDVY - Intel Ice Lake-LP DRAM

Ubuntu 23.04 - 6.2.0-24-generic - GNOME Shell 44.0

Find More Test Results