2 x AMD EPYC 9554 vs. 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H vs. 2 x AMD EPYC 9654 Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 239 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

2 x AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core had the most wins, coming in first place for 58% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (2 x AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core) was 1.342x the speed of the slowest (2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H). 2 x AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core was 0.926x the speed of 2 x AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core and 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H was 0.804x the speed of 2 x AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core.

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: PostgreSQL (Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency) at 4.688x, PostgreSQL (Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only) at 4.643x, OpenVINO (Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU) at 4.231x, OpenVINO (Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU) at 3.778x, libxsmm (M N K: 256) at 3.73x, OpenVINO (Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU) at 3.365x, OpenVINO (Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU) at 3.326x, OpenVINO (Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU) at 2.992x, OpenVINO (Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU) at 2.695x, OpenVINO (Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU) at 2.627x.

239 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread