AMD EPYC Zen 4C power efficiency benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article.
EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 Processor: AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core @ 2.20GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN B8026T70AE24HR (V1.02.B10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 8 x 16 GB 2667MT/s Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD, Disk: 1000GB INTEL SSDPE2KX010T8 + 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.6.9-060609-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1 (LLVM 15.0.7 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x800126eJava Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.10)Python Notes: Python 3.11.6Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Mitigation of untrained return thunk; SMT vulnerable + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of Safe RET + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Retpolines IBPB: conditional STIBP: disabled RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C Processor: AMD EPYC 8324P 32-Core @ 2.65GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads)Motherboard: AMD Cinnabar (RCB1009C BIOS)Chipset: AMD Device 14a4Memory: 6 x 32 GB DRAM-4800MT/s Samsung M321R4GA0BB0-CQKMGDisk: 1000GB INTEL SSDPE2KX010T8Graphics: llvmpipeNetwork: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.6.9-060609-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1 (LLVM 15.0.7 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xaa00212Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.10)Python Notes: Python 3.11.6Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of Safe RET + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W Processor: AMD EPYC 8324P 32-Core @ 2.65GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: AMD Cinnabar (RCB1009C BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14a4, Memory: 6 x 32 GB DRAM-4800MT/s Samsung M321R4GA0BB0-CQKMG, Disk: 1000GB INTEL SSDPE2KX010T8, Graphics: ASPEEDNetwork: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.6.9-060609-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C Processor: AMD EPYC 8534PN 32-Core @ 2.05GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads)Motherboard: AMD Cinnabar (RCB1009C BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14a4, Memory: 6 x 32 GB DRAM-4800MT/s Samsung M321R4GA0BB0-CQKMG, Disk: 1000GB INTEL SSDPE2KX010T8, Graphics: llvmpipeNetwork: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.6.9-060609-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1 (LLVM 15.0.7 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C Changed Processor to AMD EPYC 8534PN 64-Core @ 2.00GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads) .
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Vehicle Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 SE +/- 1.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 296.42 1860.65 1710.42 1527.32 2816.09 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -pie
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection Retail FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 SE +/- 1.73, N = 3 SE +/- 1.37, N = 3 SE +/- 1.85, N = 3 SE +/- 9.00, N = 3 878.71 5418.92 4977.13 4405.62 8310.71 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -pie
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.54, N = 3 38.63 194.71 180.32 163.09 295.61 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -pie
Llama.cpp Llama.cpp is a port of Facebook's LLaMA model in C/C++ developed by Georgi Gerganov. Llama.cpp allows the inference of LLaMA and other supported models in C/C++. For CPU inference Llama.cpp supports AVX2/AVX-512, ARM NEON, and other modern ISAs along with features like OpenBLAS usage. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Tokens Per Second, More Is Better Llama.cpp b1808 Model: llama-2-70b-chat.Q5_0.gguf EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 0.7718 1.5436 2.3154 3.0872 3.859 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 0.46 3.43 2.93 3.11 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fPIC -O3 -pthread -march=native -mtune=native -lopenblas Tokens Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Tokens Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Llama.cpp b1808 Model: llama-2-70b-chat.Q5_0.gguf EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 0.007 0.014 0.021 0.028 0.035 0.003 0.027 0.028 0.031 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Llama.cpp b1808 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 63.96 / Avg: 134.92 / Max: 177.01 Min: 12.95 / Avg: 126.42 / Max: 141.34 Min: 12.23 / Avg: 103.99 / Max: 121.16 Min: 12.75 / Avg: 101.14 / Max: 109.8
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Tokens Per Second, More Is Better Llama.cpp b1808 Model: llama-2-13b.Q4_0.gguf EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 12 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 2.49 17.93 17.09 17.06 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fPIC -O3 -pthread -march=native -mtune=native -lopenblas Tokens Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Tokens Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Llama.cpp b1808 Model: llama-2-13b.Q4_0.gguf EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 0.0419 0.0838 0.1257 0.1676 0.2095 0.019 0.174 0.179 0.186 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Llama.cpp b1808 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 64.3 / Avg: 132.73 / Max: 166.67 Min: 12.93 / Avg: 103.08 / Max: 130.52 Min: 13.19 / Avg: 95.63 / Max: 116.67 Min: 12.55 / Avg: 91.51 / Max: 104.23
miniBUDE MiniBUDE is a mini application for the the core computation of the Bristol University Docking Engine (BUDE). This test profile currently makes use of the OpenMP implementation of miniBUDE for CPU benchmarking. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org GFInst/s, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 355.99 1532.27 1425.32 1276.47 2489.20 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -Ofast -ffast-math -fopenmp -march=native -lm
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Billion Interactions/s, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 14.24 61.29 57.01 51.06 99.57 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -Ofast -ffast-math -fopenmp -march=native -lm Billion Interactions/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Billion Interactions/s Per Watt, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM2 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.1859 0.3718 0.5577 0.7436 0.9295 0.084 0.570 0.606 0.645 0.826 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.5 169.5 175.3 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.4 107.5 121.8 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.8 94.1 106.1 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.1 79.2 88.9 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.8 120.5 131.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Billion Interactions/s, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 SE +/- 0.06, N = 4 SE +/- 0.02, N = 6 14.33 61.15 57.10 51.12 99.65 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -Ofast -ffast-math -fopenmp -march=native -lm Billion Interactions/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Billion Interactions/s Per Watt, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.2446 0.4892 0.7338 0.9784 1.223 0.087 0.684 0.718 0.746 1.087 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 66.1 164.9 176.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.7 89.5 122.9 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 14.1 79.5 107.9 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 13.1 68.5 88.4 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 14.4 91.7 132.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenBenchmarking.org GFInst/s, More Is Better miniBUDE 20210901 Implementation: OpenMP - Input Deck: BM1 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 4 SE +/- 0.86, N = 4 SE +/- 1.51, N = 4 SE +/- 0.47, N = 6 358.25 1528.85 1427.41 1278.03 2491.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=c99 -Ofast -ffast-math -fopenmp -march=native -lm
Neural Magic DeepSparse This is a benchmark of Neural Magic's DeepSparse using its built-in deepsparse.benchmark utility and various models from their SparseZoo (https://sparsezoo.neuralmagic.com/). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: CV Segmentation, 90% Pruned YOLACT Pruned - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.0850, N = 3 SE +/- 0.0215, N = 3 SE +/- 0.0667, N = 3 SE +/- 0.0604, N = 3 SE +/- 0.1049, N = 3 8.5097 38.8202 35.7929 32.1289 56.8419
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test profile makes use of the built-in "openssl speed" benchmarking capabilities. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40000M 80000M 120000M 160000M 200000M SE +/- 21793844.67, N = 3 SE +/- 5327895.48, N = 3 SE +/- 3407926.56, N = 3 SE +/- 36167959.31, N = 3 SE +/- 52537274.39, N = 3 30341046637 113105892877 112344083843 101065023123 196012573853 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -ldl byte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 300M 600M 900M 1200M 1500M 177417166.50 947613075.92 1067969605.53 1181271903.83 1450412054.66 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.9 171.0 177.9 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.3 119.4 130.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.9 105.2 110.7 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.7 85.6 95.5 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 14.2 135.1 142.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Road Segmentation ADAS FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 SE +/- 3.62, N = 3 149.01 633.21 579.34 520.24 934.59 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -pie
OSPRay Intel OSPRay is a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidelity scientific visualizations. OSPRay builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01198, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01463, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02613, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01310, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00073, N = 3 2.45276 8.83622 8.45634 7.66532 14.61310 Items Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/scivis/real_time EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.0293 0.0586 0.0879 0.1172 0.1465 0.016 0.083 0.095 0.101 0.130 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.1 155.2 177.3 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 11.4 106.4 122.1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.7 89.2 107.3 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.4 75.5 89.1 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.8 112.7 134.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test profile makes use of the built-in "openssl speed" benchmarking capabilities. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 60000M 120000M 180000M 240000M 300000M SE +/- 18792715.18, N = 3 SE +/- 3614035.56, N = 3 SE +/- 2748202.21, N = 3 SE +/- 4106091.67, N = 3 SE +/- 8141159.25, N = 3 47935580060 159447675517 159431008620 147602077650 284696293373 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -ldl byte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 400M 800M 1200M 1600M 2000M 280245644.36 1370606684.98 1474962096.07 1694474523.22 2095501066.50 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.3 171.0 177.6 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.3 116.3 131.9 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.7 108.1 113.9 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.5 87.1 90.7 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 14.3 135.9 143.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
TensorFlow This is a benchmark of the TensorFlow deep learning framework using the TensorFlow reference benchmarks (tensorflow/benchmarks with tf_cnn_benchmarks.py). Note with the Phoronix Test Suite there is also pts/tensorflow-lite for benchmarking the TensorFlow Lite binaries if desired for complementary metrics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 8.77 51.70 51.03 47.77 48.56 images/sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec Per Watt, More Is Better TensorFlow 2.12 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.1314 0.2628 0.3942 0.5256 0.657 0.068 0.553 0.551 0.584 0.519 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.2 129.4 142.8 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.0 93.5 112.6 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.2 92.6 109.9 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 6.7 81.9 97.1 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.0 93.6 109.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow 2.12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
OSPRay Intel OSPRay is a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidelity scientific visualizations. OSPRay builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00308, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02105, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02664, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02953, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01491, N = 3 2.59961 9.14257 8.78898 7.97910 15.05960 Items Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.0302 0.0604 0.0906 0.1208 0.151 0.017 0.086 0.099 0.106 0.134 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.9 154.5 177.4 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.5 105.7 121.6 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.7 88.9 106.3 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 13.1 75.3 89.0 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.7 112.5 134.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Handwritten English Recognition FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.74, N = 3 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 SE +/- 5.36, N = 8 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 188.86 688.60 621.82 555.71 1086.68 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -pie
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 8.89, N = 3 SE +/- 23.70, N = 3 SE +/- 37.85, N = 3 SE +/- 33.66, N = 3 SE +/- 93.27, N = 3 13039.70 52709.19 49194.55 43375.55 71960.41 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -pie
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 1.37, N = 3 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 SE +/- 1.32, N = 3 SE +/- 2.30, N = 3 464.48 1701.18 1563.36 1424.53 2547.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -pie
ACES DGEMM This is a multi-threaded DGEMM benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.031226, N = 3 SE +/- 0.076181, N = 15 SE +/- 0.135732, N = 3 SE +/- 0.073791, N = 3 SE +/- 0.111892, N = 5 3.886776 11.645616 11.434849 11.517272 21.138819 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp GFLOP/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s Per Watt, More Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.054 0.108 0.162 0.216 0.27 0.025 0.133 0.140 0.170 0.240 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.6 154.9 170.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.3 87.3 115.0 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.5 81.5 109.9 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.6 67.9 89.1 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.9 88.1 130.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Neural Magic DeepSparse This is a benchmark of Neural Magic's DeepSparse using its built-in deepsparse.benchmark utility and various models from their SparseZoo (https://sparsezoo.neuralmagic.com/). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 2.58, N = 3 SE +/- 1.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 246.64 818.31 752.59 674.93 1287.88
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test profile makes use of the built-in "openssl speed" benchmarking capabilities. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 110000M 220000M 330000M 440000M 550000M SE +/- 228892930.90, N = 3 SE +/- 338919345.53, N = 3 SE +/- 1389668244.12, N = 3 SE +/- 43613214.37, N = 3 SE +/- 350336826.28, N = 3 97707034820 308207308437 281191878567 251415558370 493434496250 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -ldl byte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 800M 1600M 2400M 3200M 4000M 559684188.57 2612982097.09 2743728420.23 2927424070.20 3626240465.70 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.9 174.6 178.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.3 118.0 131.8 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.6 102.5 112.1 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.9 85.9 94.2 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 14.3 136.1 141.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 42.43 150.74 144.27 131.24 202.29 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -pie
Neural Magic DeepSparse This is a benchmark of Neural Magic's DeepSparse using its built-in deepsparse.benchmark utility and various models from their SparseZoo (https://sparsezoo.neuralmagic.com/). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 1.39, N = 3 SE +/- 1.61, N = 3 SE +/- 1.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 128.67 383.70 357.30 320.86 613.23
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test profile makes use of the built-in "openssl speed" benchmarking capabilities. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 90000M 180000M 270000M 360000M 450000M SE +/- 220160896.72, N = 3 SE +/- 72395520.64, N = 3 SE +/- 104993783.37, N = 3 SE +/- 288672373.67, N = 3 SE +/- 171818503.35, N = 3 89976610817 265303113457 242830526873 216435660207 424400038207 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -ldl byte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 700M 1400M 2100M 2800M 3500M 516298912.20 2258891761.22 2396310835.77 2539685896.32 3123938397.23 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.3 174.3 178.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.3 117.4 132.0 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.7 101.3 115.1 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 13.0 85.2 93.8 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 14.4 135.9 141.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenBenchmarking.org sign/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 12.09, N = 3 SE +/- 2.49, N = 3 SE +/- 3.08, N = 3 SE +/- 3.00, N = 3 SE +/- 4.13, N = 3 4497.1 15040.7 13565.8 11909.2 21064.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -ldl
Neural Magic DeepSparse This is a benchmark of Neural Magic's DeepSparse using its built-in deepsparse.benchmark utility and various models from their SparseZoo (https://sparsezoo.neuralmagic.com/). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: CV Segmentation, 90% Pruned YOLACT Pruned - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 6.61, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 SE +/- 0.40, N = 3 1840.95 410.47 443.43 493.99 556.15 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.6 142.0 172.7 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.0 89.2 114.7 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.1 81.2 97.7 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.8 69.8 81.3 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.6 103.7 123.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Xmrig Xmrig is an open-source cross-platform CPU/GPU miner for RandomX, KawPow, CryptoNight and AstroBWT. This test profile is setup to measure the Xmrig CPU mining performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: GhostRider - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 12.26, N = 3 SE +/- 7.57, N = 3 SE +/- 19.57, N = 3 SE +/- 16.58, N = 3 SE +/- 6.81, N = 3 1042.7 4043.2 4031.7 3938.5 4374.0 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fexceptions -fno-rtti -maes -O3 -Ofast -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -rdynamic -lssl -lcrypto -luv -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lhwloc H/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: GhostRider - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 11 22 33 44 55 7.453 41.050 40.527 50.340 35.481 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 65.8 / Avg: 139.9 / Max: 146.26 Min: 12.7 / Avg: 98.5 / Max: 101.31 Min: 13.53 / Avg: 99.48 / Max: 102.3 Min: 13.02 / Avg: 78.24 / Max: 88.48 Min: 14.94 / Avg: 123.28 / Max: 126.95
OSPRay Intel OSPRay is a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidelity scientific visualizations. OSPRay builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00520, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00075, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00699, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00484, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00619, N = 3 4.14655 10.49390 9.87373 8.89361 16.89540 Items Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.034 0.068 0.102 0.136 0.17 0.026 0.107 0.113 0.119 0.151 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.9 158.4 177.4 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.0 98.1 122.1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.7 87.1 106.8 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.6 74.9 86.9 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 14.2 111.9 133.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OSPRay Studio Intel OSPRay Studio is an open-source, interactive visualization and ray-tracing software package. OSPRay Studio makes use of Intel OSPRay, a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidelity visualizations. OSPRay builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
easyWave The easyWave software allows simulating tsunami generation and propagation in the context of early warning systems. EasyWave supports making use of OpenMP for CPU multi-threading and there are also GPU ports available but not currently incorporated as part of this test profile. The easyWave tsunami generation software is run with one of the example/reference input files for measuring the CPU execution time. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Xmrig Xmrig is an open-source cross-platform CPU/GPU miner for RandomX, KawPow, CryptoNight and AstroBWT. This test profile is setup to measure the Xmrig CPU mining performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 120.26, N = 3 SE +/- 52.06, N = 3 SE +/- 6.52, N = 3 SE +/- 107.46, N = 3 SE +/- 47.09, N = 3 9331.6 25644.3 24096.2 21769.2 35370.0 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fexceptions -fno-rtti -maes -O3 -Ofast -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -rdynamic -lssl -lcrypto -luv -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lhwloc H/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 60 120 180 240 300 57.58 219.80 233.10 247.53 265.91 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.7 162.1 172.1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.3 116.4 133.1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 12.8 103.4 113.7 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 13.1 87.9 95.9 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 14.3 133.0 154.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OSPRay Studio Intel OSPRay Studio is an open-source, interactive visualization and ray-tracing software package. OSPRay Studio makes use of Intel OSPRay, a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidelity visualizations. OSPRay builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OSPRay Studio Intel OSPRay Studio is an open-source, interactive visualization and ray-tracing software package. OSPRay Studio makes use of Intel OSPRay, a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidelity visualizations. OSPRay builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Intel Open Image Denoise Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.1 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.3848 0.7696 1.1544 1.5392 1.924 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.48 1.11 1.03 0.93 1.71 Images / Sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.1 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 - Device: CPU-Only EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.0038 0.0076 0.0114 0.0152 0.019 0.003 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.017 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.5 165.0 174.6 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.2 96.0 121.1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.7 85.6 101.3 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 11.7 72.9 83.5 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.9 101.2 124.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Embree Intel Embree is a collection of high-performance ray-tracing kernels for execution on CPUs (and GPUs via SYCL) and supporting instruction sets such as SSE, AVX, AVX2, and AVX-512. Embree also supports making use of the Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 5 21.84 45.51 43.13 39.60 74.93 MIN: 21.59 / MAX: 22.16 MIN: 45.23 / MAX: 46.5 MIN: 42.84 / MAX: 43.66 MIN: 39.34 / MAX: 40.89 MIN: 73.96 / MAX: 76.92 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.1694 0.3388 0.5082 0.6776 0.847 0.135 0.434 0.498 0.522 0.753 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.7 162.4 177.6 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.7 105.0 134.4 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 14.0 86.6 107.3 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.8 75.9 95.2 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 14.4 99.5 140.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 4.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Neural Magic DeepSparse This is a benchmark of Neural Magic's DeepSparse using its built-in deepsparse.benchmark utility and various models from their SparseZoo (https://sparsezoo.neuralmagic.com/). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.71, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 84.43 181.23 169.56 152.21 281.49
OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 12.22 25.84 24.47 21.91 40.64
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: NLP Text Classification, BERT base uncased SST2, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.70, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 64.80 19.53 21.24 23.69 24.82 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.8 139.0 177.3 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.1 81.3 112.8 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.4 73.7 97.1 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.6 64.6 82.1 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.2 79.6 118.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
easyWave The easyWave software allows simulating tsunami generation and propagation in the context of early warning systems. EasyWave supports making use of OpenMP for CPU multi-threading and there are also GPU ports available but not currently incorporated as part of this test profile. The easyWave tsunami generation software is run with one of the example/reference input files for measuring the CPU execution time. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Embree Intel Embree is a collection of high-performance ray-tracing kernels for execution on CPUs (and GPUs via SYCL) and supporting instruction sets such as SSE, AVX, AVX2, and AVX-512. Embree also supports making use of the Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 18.44 36.89 34.24 31.08 59.05 MIN: 18.15 / MAX: 18.78 MIN: 36.22 / MAX: 37.68 MIN: 33.72 / MAX: 35.12 MIN: 30.63 / MAX: 31.81 MIN: 57.98 / MAX: 61.17 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 4.3 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.1827 0.3654 0.5481 0.7308 0.9135 0.112 0.361 0.373 0.398 0.812 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.9 165.2 178.1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.5 102.3 133.5 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.7 91.8 110.4 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.9 78.1 96.0 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.7 72.7 142.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 4.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Neural Magic DeepSparse This is a benchmark of Neural Magic's DeepSparse using its built-in deepsparse.benchmark utility and various models from their SparseZoo (https://sparsezoo.neuralmagic.com/). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 138.03 266.96 254.30 229.54 429.33
OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 10.34 21.00 19.75 17.67 32.15
OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: ResNet-50, Baseline - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 138.53 266.99 254.13 229.91 429.36
OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 10.45 21.02 19.64 17.76 32.16
OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: ResNet-50, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 7.34, N = 3 SE +/- 2.41, N = 3 SE +/- 2.26, N = 3 SE +/- 2.41, N = 3 152.96 2193.09 2099.32 1906.39 3450.43
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.37, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 124.09 41.64 44.72 49.80 52.12 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.2 138.7 176.8 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.8 81.7 112.7 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.0 74.1 96.2 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.7 64.9 80.5 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 11.8 92.3 120.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
RocksDB This is a benchmark of Meta/Facebook's RocksDB as an embeddable persistent key-value store for fast storage based on Google's LevelDB. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Read EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 50M 100M 150M 200M 250M SE +/- 709803.02, N = 3 SE +/- 126210.06, N = 3 SE +/- 294601.47, N = 3 SE +/- 242981.96, N = 3 SE +/- 187915.38, N = 3 84616408 161678876 147721769 131206830 248969387 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread Op/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s Per Watt, More Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Random Read EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 499648.82 1613507.12 1652219.58 1742913.89 2230797.09 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 66.2 169.4 178.6 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.6 100.2 110.8 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.6 89.4 96.6 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.7 75.3 80.3 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.8 111.6 129.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RocksDB 8.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Speedb Speedb is a next-generation key value storage engine that is RocksDB compatible and aiming for stability, efficiency, and performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Speedb 2.7 Test: Random Read EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 50M 100M 150M 200M 250M SE +/- 986396.38, N = 3 SE +/- 141623.12, N = 3 SE +/- 1751764.05, N = 3 SE +/- 227689.47, N = 3 SE +/- 139678.30, N = 3 85990445 163771762 147991555 132248192 248842616 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread Op/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s Per Watt, More Is Better Speedb 2.7 Test: Random Read EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 505924.53 1624547.01 1658329.33 1749308.71 2534080.33 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.6 170.0 178.3 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.1 100.8 111.0 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.7 89.2 97.6 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.8 75.6 86.1 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.1 98.2 128.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Speedb 2.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Blender Blender is an open-source 3D creation and modeling software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles performance with various sample files. GPU computing via NVIDIA OptiX and NVIDIA CUDA is currently supported as well as HIP for AMD Radeon GPUs and Intel oneAPI for Intel Graphics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OSPRay Intel OSPRay is a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidelity scientific visualizations. OSPRay builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00416, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00419, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01425, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00550, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01627, N = 3 5.22927 8.77043 8.75896 8.14358 14.85490 Items Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/scivis/real_time EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.032 0.064 0.096 0.128 0.16 0.034 0.093 0.100 0.111 0.142 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 60.0 155.5 175.7 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.8 94.0 110.8 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.8 87.3 109.1 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.6 73.4 85.4 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.6 104.4 125.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test profile makes use of the built-in "openssl speed" benchmarking capabilities. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 714.27, N = 3 SE +/- 61.89, N = 3 SE +/- 30.98, N = 3 SE +/- 22.57, N = 3 SE +/- 136.41, N = 3 292445.3 457516.3 457514.1 430171.6 828697.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -ldl verify/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 1719.96 4477.07 5076.37 5622.23 7110.60 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.7 170.0 178.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.4 102.2 116.0 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.7 90.1 102.2 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.2 76.5 83.6 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 14.6 116.5 129.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OSPRay Intel OSPRay is a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidelity scientific visualizations. OSPRay builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00450, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00420, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02372, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01797, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02133, N = 3 5.28576 8.79773 8.75784 8.13231 14.90860 Items Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/ao/real_time EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.0286 0.0572 0.0858 0.1144 0.143 0.031 0.083 0.091 0.105 0.127 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.2 170.3 175.8 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.2 106.5 111.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.7 95.9 110.1 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.5 77.2 86.1 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.7 117.1 126.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Neural Magic DeepSparse This is a benchmark of Neural Magic's DeepSparse using its built-in deepsparse.benchmark utility and various models from their SparseZoo (https://sparsezoo.neuralmagic.com/). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 68.16 122.37 114.62 103.44 191.07
OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 68.95 122.93 115.42 104.13 192.06
Chaos Group V-RAY This is a test of Chaos Group's V-RAY benchmark. V-RAY is a commercial renderer that can integrate with various creator software products like SketchUp and 3ds Max. The V-RAY benchmark is standalone and supports CPU and NVIDIA CUDA/RTX based rendering. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org vsamples, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02 Mode: CPU EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 105.66, N = 3 SE +/- 277.30, N = 3 SE +/- 150.82, N = 3 SE +/- 326.21, N = 3 SE +/- 123.39, N = 3 19914 33510 31536 28177 54204 vsamples Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org vsamples Per Watt, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02 Mode: CPU EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 110 220 330 440 550 136.76 351.76 361.93 377.52 487.44 Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.1 145.6 179.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.9 95.3 122.0 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.5 87.1 106.2 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.2 74.6 91.5 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.7 111.2 137.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 5.02 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test profile makes use of the built-in "openssl speed" benchmarking capabilities. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 5000M 10000M 15000M 20000M 25000M SE +/- 7664614.59, N = 3 SE +/- 1511880.16, N = 3 SE +/- 794607.82, N = 3 SE +/- 3220312.96, N = 3 SE +/- 1693446.92, N = 3 8355425337 13803340747 12993940737 11644867590 22697266207 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -ldl byte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40M 80M 120M 160M 200M 47835855.20 122734575.99 132126423.40 142108901.03 175273393.29 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.5 174.7 178.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.8 112.5 125.9 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.6 98.3 106.9 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 13.0 81.9 88.0 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 14.3 129.5 138.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-AV1 This is a benchmark of the SVT-AV1 open-source video encoder/decoder. SVT-AV1 was originally developed by Intel as part of their Open Visual Cloud / Scalable Video Technology (SVT). Development of SVT-AV1 has since moved to the Alliance for Open Media as part of upstream AV1 development. SVT-AV1 is a CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the AV1 video format with a sample YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 SE +/- 1.24, N = 13 SE +/- 1.73, N = 6 SE +/- 1.17, N = 5 SE +/- 2.10, N = 5 70.77 182.26 175.75 167.16 190.89 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 12 - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.8829 1.7658 2.6487 3.5316 4.4145 0.726 3.665 3.666 3.739 3.924 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.4 97.5 157.6 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.0 49.7 112.3 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.2 47.9 100.4 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.5 44.5 82.7 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.7 48.6 109.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
7-Zip Compression This is a test of 7-Zip compression/decompression with its integrated benchmark feature. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 1639.95, N = 3 SE +/- 329.87, N = 3 SE +/- 172.23, N = 3 SE +/- 39.63, N = 3 SE +/- 303.12, N = 3 123746 240083 228957 212458 332922 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
Blender Blender is an open-source 3D creation and modeling software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles performance with various sample files. GPU computing via NVIDIA OptiX and NVIDIA CUDA is currently supported as well as HIP for AMD Radeon GPUs and Intel oneAPI for Intel Graphics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test profile makes use of the built-in "openssl speed" benchmarking capabilities. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 15000M 30000M 45000M 60000M 75000M SE +/- 58715423.07, N = 3 SE +/- 11419799.65, N = 3 SE +/- 12904999.14, N = 3 SE +/- 16148314.98, N = 3 SE +/- 41929433.75, N = 3 27015393267 43033082363 40200353400 35795826073 69910430987 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -ldl byte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 120M 240M 360M 480M 600M 155415474.32 387067179.89 416875314.97 436238930.85 546243197.78 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.3 173.8 178.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.0 111.2 118.1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.5 96.4 102.1 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.8 82.1 90.4 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.1 128.0 136.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Blender Blender is an open-source 3D creation and modeling software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles performance with various sample files. GPU computing via NVIDIA OptiX and NVIDIA CUDA is currently supported as well as HIP for AMD Radeon GPUs and Intel oneAPI for Intel Graphics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
7-Zip Compression This is a test of 7-Zip compression/decompression with its integrated benchmark feature. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 602.42, N = 3 SE +/- 111.02, N = 3 SE +/- 181.34, N = 3 SE +/- 170.94, N = 3 SE +/- 107.49, N = 3 133490 211187 200034 179072 343946 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC MIPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS Per Watt, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 846.16 2150.10 2334.06 2439.42 3105.30 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.9 157.8 178.5 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.8 98.2 130.5 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.6 85.7 113.3 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.3 73.4 90.8 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.2 110.8 145.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
nginx This is a benchmark of the lightweight Nginx HTTP(S) web-server. This Nginx web server benchmark test profile makes use of the wrk program for facilitating the HTTP requests over a fixed period time with a configurable number of concurrent clients/connections. HTTPS with a self-signed OpenSSL certificate is used by this test for local benchmarking. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 357.56, N = 3 SE +/- 343.16, N = 3 SE +/- 49.01, N = 3 SE +/- 199.18, N = 3 SE +/- 302.03, N = 3 90952.15 166799.14 151923.62 139259.26 232146.41 1. (CC) gcc options: -lluajit-5.1 -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl -std=c99 -O2 Requests Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 1000 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 400 800 1200 1600 2000 540.03 1365.65 1532.61 1663.27 1785.71 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 63.9 168.4 177.8 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.3 122.1 134.6 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.5 99.1 113.1 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.8 83.7 92.6 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.4 130.0 141.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better nginx 1.23.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
IndigoBench This is a test of Indigo Renderer's IndigoBench benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/s, More Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.024, N = 3 SE +/- 0.058, N = 3 SE +/- 0.005, N = 3 SE +/- 0.010, N = 3 SE +/- 0.020, N = 3 8.586 13.573 12.572 11.249 21.767 M samples/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.0437 0.0874 0.1311 0.1748 0.2185 0.051 0.122 0.130 0.137 0.194 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.9 166.9 178.8 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.6 111.0 122.4 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.7 96.6 108.8 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.4 82.0 88.8 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.4 112.4 140.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Blender Blender is an open-source 3D creation and modeling software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles performance with various sample files. GPU computing via NVIDIA OptiX and NVIDIA CUDA is currently supported as well as HIP for AMD Radeon GPUs and Intel oneAPI for Intel Graphics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
IndigoBench This is a test of Indigo Renderer's IndigoBench benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/s, More Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.010, N = 3 SE +/- 0.021, N = 3 SE +/- 0.013, N = 3 SE +/- 0.010, N = 3 SE +/- 0.011, N = 3 3.985 6.177 5.720 5.127 9.973 M samples/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.0221 0.0442 0.0663 0.0884 0.1105 0.024 0.055 0.058 0.061 0.098 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.4 165.8 179.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.3 112.5 129.6 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.8 98.9 111.2 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.4 83.6 91.8 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 7.0 101.7 142.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better IndigoBench 4.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
nginx This is a benchmark of the lightweight Nginx HTTP(S) web-server. This Nginx web server benchmark test profile makes use of the wrk program for facilitating the HTTP requests over a fixed period time with a configurable number of concurrent clients/connections. HTTPS with a self-signed OpenSSL certificate is used by this test for local benchmarking. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 911.83, N = 3 SE +/- 549.43, N = 3 SE +/- 1108.21, N = 3 SE +/- 213.01, N = 3 SE +/- 217.83, N = 3 94936.99 164234.98 149458.34 136660.96 229161.91 1. (CC) gcc options: -lluajit-5.1 -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -ldl -std=c99 -O2 Requests Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better nginx 1.23.2 Connections: 500 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 400 800 1200 1600 2000 561.58 1355.86 1536.38 1656.12 1802.11 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 60.9 169.1 178.8 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 11.6 121.1 132.4 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 12.9 97.3 110.2 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 11.7 82.5 91.8 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.6 127.2 140.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better nginx 1.23.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark Memtier_benchmark is a NoSQL Redis/Memcache traffic generation plus benchmarking tool developed by Redis Labs. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 11184.62, N = 3 SE +/- 10431.24, N = 3 SE +/- 15002.29, N = 3 SE +/- 18767.16, N = 3 SE +/- 10691.43, N = 3 1159654.33 2795965.05 2720321.30 2500035.09 2513019.32 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre Ops/sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K 7148.89 32252.28 36173.12 39908.91 27624.53 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 66.5 162.2 178.4 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.0 86.7 99.3 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.4 75.2 93.2 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.3 62.6 75.6 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.3 91.0 105.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-AV1 This is a benchmark of the SVT-AV1 open-source video encoder/decoder. SVT-AV1 was originally developed by Intel as part of their Open Visual Cloud / Scalable Video Technology (SVT). Development of SVT-AV1 has since moved to the Alliance for Open Media as part of upstream AV1 development. SVT-AV1 is a CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the AV1 video format with a sample YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.28, N = 5 SE +/- 0.13, N = 4 SE +/- 0.14, N = 4 SE +/- 0.05, N = 4 SE +/- 0.39, N = 4 26.75 58.00 55.72 51.54 64.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.2171 0.4342 0.6513 0.8684 1.0855 0.215 0.826 0.855 0.882 0.965 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 63.7 124.3 172.5 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.4 70.2 112.0 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.2 65.2 97.5 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.5 58.5 84.2 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.2 66.7 108.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
QuantLib QuantLib is an open-source library/framework around quantitative finance for modeling, trading and risk management scenarios. QuantLib is written in C++ with Boost and its built-in benchmark used reports the QuantLib Benchmark Index benchmark score. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better QuantLib 1.32 Configuration: Multi-Threaded EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 165.76, N = 3 SE +/- 60.04, N = 3 SE +/- 100.68, N = 3 SE +/- 122.23, N = 3 SE +/- 29.72, N = 3 64469.4 98717.2 90654.1 80175.3 154830.9 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fPIE -pie MFLOPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better QuantLib 1.32 Configuration: Multi-Threaded EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 300 600 900 1200 1500 384.04 945.62 967.97 1007.58 1273.59 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.3 167.9 179.0 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.8 104.4 122.9 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.3 93.7 108.8 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.5 79.6 95.3 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.5 121.6 136.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better QuantLib 1.32 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Blender Blender is an open-source 3D creation and modeling software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles performance with various sample files. GPU computing via NVIDIA OptiX and NVIDIA CUDA is currently supported as well as HIP for AMD Radeon GPUs and Intel oneAPI for Intel Graphics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
NAMD NAMD is a parallel molecular dynamics code designed for high-performance simulation of large biomolecular systems. NAMD was developed by the Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group in the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.2189 0.4378 0.6567 0.8756 1.0945 SE +/- 0.00038, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00067, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00161, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00094, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00128, N = 3 0.97282 0.67728 0.73558 0.82790 0.43200 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.7 165.3 178.5 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.5 106.4 125.6 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.9 94.8 107.7 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.1 80.9 90.2 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 14.7 118.1 142.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
FFmpeg This is a benchmark of the FFmpeg multimedia framework. The FFmpeg test profile is making use of a modified version of vbench from Columbia University's Architecture and Design Lab (ARCADE) [http://arcade.cs.columbia.edu/vbench/] that is a benchmark for video-as-a-service workloads. The test profile offers the options of a range of vbench scenarios based on freely distributable video content and offers the options of using the x264 or x265 video encoders for transcoding. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 21.00 45.07 45.06 44.99 47.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma FPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Video On Demand EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.173 0.346 0.519 0.692 0.865 0.241 0.753 0.744 0.769 0.765 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 37.8 87.0 127.4 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.6 59.8 78.4 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.2 60.5 78.7 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.7 58.5 74.5 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.9 61.5 79.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 10.40 22.24 22.25 22.24 23.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma FPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Upload EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.0911 0.1822 0.2733 0.3644 0.4555 0.123 0.396 0.391 0.405 0.404 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 63.0 84.5 141.4 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.7 56.2 86.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.3 57.0 89.0 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.7 55.0 76.7 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.2 57.7 89.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Timed Node.js Compilation This test profile times how long it takes to build/compile Node.js itself from source. Node.js is a JavaScript run-time built from the Chrome V8 JavaScript engine while itself is written in C/C++. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
FFmpeg This is a benchmark of the FFmpeg multimedia framework. The FFmpeg test profile is making use of a modified version of vbench from Columbia University's Architecture and Design Lab (ARCADE) [http://arcade.cs.columbia.edu/vbench/] that is a benchmark for video-as-a-service workloads. The test profile offers the options of a range of vbench scenarios based on freely distributable video content and offers the options of using the x264 or x265 video encoders for transcoding. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 21.02 45.01 45.12 45.03 47.03 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma FPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Platform EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.173 0.346 0.519 0.692 0.865 0.241 0.753 0.745 0.769 0.766 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 62.5 87.1 125.3 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.5 59.8 75.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.3 60.5 78.2 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 11.9 58.6 75.3 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 11.3 61.4 77.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark Memtier_benchmark is a NoSQL Redis/Memcache traffic generation plus benchmarking tool developed by Redis Labs. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 10214.62, N = 3 SE +/- 3585.70, N = 3 SE +/- 16343.62, N = 3 SE +/- 11338.77, N = 3 SE +/- 20726.56, N = 3 1277853.47 2842511.46 2789711.34 2562876.16 2568868.49 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre Ops/sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 Protocol: Redis - Clients: 100 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K 7946.04 32673.79 37066.25 41473.46 28227.25 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.4 160.8 178.4 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 11.2 87.0 99.1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.6 75.3 93.2 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 11.3 61.8 76.7 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.5 91.0 106.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 7.0.12 + memtier_benchmark 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation This test times how long it takes to build the Linux kernel in a default configuration (defconfig) for the architecture being tested or alternatively an allmodconfig for building all possible kernel modules for the build. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Neural Magic DeepSparse This is a benchmark of Neural Magic's DeepSparse using its built-in deepsparse.benchmark utility and various models from their SparseZoo (https://sparsezoo.neuralmagic.com/). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: NLP Text Classification, DistilBERT mnli - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.56, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 189.32 88.15 94.20 104.90 113.45 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.4 148.0 176.5 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.9 87.7 109.6 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 12.7 78.5 91.9 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.6 67.5 83.1 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.8 99.4 123.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
uvg266 uvg266 is an open-source VVC/H.266 (Versatile Video Coding) encoder based on Kvazaar as part of the Ultra Video Group, Tampere University, Finland. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 4 SE +/- 0.02, N = 4 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 4 22.26 39.25 37.33 33.82 47.65 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.1217 0.2434 0.3651 0.4868 0.6085 0.146 0.439 0.464 0.494 0.541 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.3 152.6 171.9 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.0 89.3 117.0 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.7 80.5 105.1 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.8 68.5 88.7 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.7 88.2 122.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-AV1 This is a benchmark of the SVT-AV1 open-source video encoder/decoder. SVT-AV1 was originally developed by Intel as part of their Open Visual Cloud / Scalable Video Technology (SVT). Development of SVT-AV1 has since moved to the Alliance for Open Media as part of upstream AV1 development. SVT-AV1 is a CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the AV1 video format with a sample YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.004, N = 3 SE +/- 0.020, N = 3 SE +/- 0.004, N = 3 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 SE +/- 0.026, N = 3 3.065 5.911 5.816 5.551 6.556 1. (CXX) g++ options: -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.0205 0.041 0.0615 0.082 0.1025 0.024 0.080 0.082 0.091 0.090 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 63.4 125.1 171.7 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.7 74.3 120.0 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.3 70.5 101.6 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.6 61.3 86.3 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.6 72.9 105.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 1.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
PyTorch Result
OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 24.89 52.72 52.91 52.90 45.23 MIN: 12.04 / MAX: 25.89 MIN: 50.17 / MAX: 53.72 MIN: 50.65 / MAX: 53.55 MIN: 50.6 / MAX: 53.56 MIN: 16.58 / MAX: 46.26 batches/sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec Per Watt, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.1816 0.3632 0.5448 0.7264 0.908 0.162 0.784 0.781 0.807 0.552 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 63.8 153.6 174.3 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.8 67.3 81.3 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.3 67.8 81.9 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.9 65.6 79.0 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.4 82.0 98.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyTorch 2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Speedb Speedb is a next-generation key value storage engine that is RocksDB compatible and aiming for stability, efficiency, and performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Speedb 2.7 Test: Read While Writing EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M SE +/- 81525.26, N = 3 SE +/- 52967.61, N = 15 SE +/- 7924.49, N = 3 SE +/- 50044.04, N = 3 SE +/- 117697.08, N = 15 5954251 7290610 7162203 6934544 12585315 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread Op/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s Per Watt, More Is Better Speedb 2.7 Test: Read While Writing EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 35300.60 64987.07 74216.65 88296.45 108503.02 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.3 168.7 178.1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 11.8 112.2 124.5 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.6 96.5 108.8 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.8 78.5 91.1 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.6 116.0 134.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Speedb 2.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Neural Magic DeepSparse This is a benchmark of Neural Magic's DeepSparse using its built-in deepsparse.benchmark utility and various models from their SparseZoo (https://sparsezoo.neuralmagic.com/). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: BERT-Large, NLP Question Answering - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 8.56, N = 3 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 1289.82 611.15 647.89 722.10 776.54 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.8 109.6 177.6 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.1 71.4 119.7 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.2 67.0 108.3 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.8 60.3 86.0 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.7 80.1 127.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
uvg266 uvg266 is an open-source VVC/H.266 (Versatile Video Coding) encoder based on Kvazaar as part of the Ultra Video Group, Tampere University, Finland. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 SE +/- 0.08, N = 4 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 SE +/- 0.06, N = 4 23.58 42.94 40.50 36.75 49.22 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Super Fast EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.1287 0.2574 0.3861 0.5148 0.6435 0.155 0.485 0.506 0.535 0.572 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.3 152.6 171.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.9 88.5 116.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.6 80.0 102.0 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.5 68.7 89.9 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.0 86.0 119.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenFOAM OpenFOAM is the leading free, open-source software for computational fluid dynamics (CFD). This test profile currently uses the drivaerFastback test case for analyzing automotive aerodynamics or alternatively the older motorBike input. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Neural Magic DeepSparse This is a benchmark of Neural Magic's DeepSparse using its built-in deepsparse.benchmark utility and various models from their SparseZoo (https://sparsezoo.neuralmagic.com/). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.89, N = 3 SE +/- 1.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 SE +/- 0.79, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 1515.68 752.51 801.19 894.20 982.33 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.5 140.7 177.7 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 11.8 88.8 121.7 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.2 80.1 102.2 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.5 69.7 89.0 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.5 101.9 133.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: ResNet-50, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.1244, N = 3 SE +/- 0.0229, N = 3 SE +/- 0.0078, N = 3 SE +/- 0.0084, N = 3 SE +/- 0.0062, N = 3 104.4436 7.2816 7.6064 8.3745 9.2520 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.5 159.1 177.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.9 93.1 108.1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.2 77.0 95.3 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.4 66.5 76.5 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.7 96.8 114.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenVINO This is a test of the Intel OpenVINO, a toolkit around neural networks, using its built-in benchmarking support and analyzing the throughput and latency for various models. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 3.81 31.25 28.58 25.41 49.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -pie
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2023.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 SE +/- 0.72, N = 3 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 SE +/- 1.98, N = 3 376.97 3102.13 2851.01 2520.77 4878.00 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -pie
Neural Magic DeepSparse This is a benchmark of Neural Magic's DeepSparse using its built-in deepsparse.benchmark utility and various models from their SparseZoo (https://sparsezoo.neuralmagic.com/). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 7.41, N = 3 SE +/- 1.08, N = 3 SE +/- 1.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 1501.61 751.62 803.82 892.10 982.61 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.7 140.6 177.4 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.1 89.9 119.5 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.1 80.9 105.1 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.5 69.4 84.7 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.3 86.8 132.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
PyTorch Result
OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 20.48 40.59 40.54 40.36 36.23 MIN: 11.38 / MAX: 21.17 MIN: 14.97 / MAX: 41.27 MIN: 14.7 / MAX: 41.23 MIN: 18.81 / MAX: 40.93 MIN: 14.59 / MAX: 36.98 batches/sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org batches/sec Per Watt, More Is Better PyTorch 2.1 Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.1211 0.2422 0.3633 0.4844 0.6055 0.127 0.527 0.519 0.538 0.389 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.7 161.6 173.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.8 77.1 88.7 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.1 78.0 89.1 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.6 75.0 85.7 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.8 93.2 106.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyTorch 2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
FFmpeg This is a benchmark of the FFmpeg multimedia framework. The FFmpeg test profile is making use of a modified version of vbench from Columbia University's Architecture and Design Lab (ARCADE) [http://arcade.cs.columbia.edu/vbench/] that is a benchmark for video-as-a-service workloads. The test profile offers the options of a range of vbench scenarios based on freely distributable video content and offers the options of using the x264 or x265 video encoders for transcoding. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 58.09 109.84 109.71 109.77 115.11 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma FPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 Encoder: libx265 - Scenario: Live EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.459 0.918 1.377 1.836 2.295 0.704 1.988 1.977 2.040 2.005 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.0 82.5 112.1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.0 55.2 74.9 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.5 55.5 74.6 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.3 53.8 71.4 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.2 57.4 78.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Xcompact3d Incompact3d Xcompact3d Incompact3d is a Fortran-MPI based, finite difference high-performance code for solving the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation and as many as you need scalar transport equations. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Neural Magic DeepSparse This is a benchmark of Neural Magic's DeepSparse using its built-in deepsparse.benchmark utility and various models from their SparseZoo (https://sparsezoo.neuralmagic.com/). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 115.78 59.87 62.82 69.60 74.43 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.5 102.0 122.5 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.9 68.0 79.8 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.7 96.9 111.4 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.2 80.2 99.0 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 66.1 159.0 177.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
RocksDB This is a benchmark of Meta/Facebook's RocksDB as an embeddable persistent key-value store for fast storage based on Google's LevelDB. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read While Writing EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 1.4M 2.8M 4.2M 5.6M 7M SE +/- 36400.82, N = 3 SE +/- 38567.21, N = 15 SE +/- 47925.84, N = 5 SE +/- 3126.89, N = 3 SE +/- 64443.01, N = 15 3463695 4394310 4301343 4107313 6688089 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread Op/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s Per Watt, More Is Better RocksDB 8.0 Test: Read While Writing EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K 20446.35 38762.72 43556.26 51316.29 57031.64 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.8 169.4 177.9 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.2 113.4 129.0 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.5 98.8 110.3 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.1 80.0 93.0 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.7 117.3 138.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RocksDB 8.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Neural Magic DeepSparse This is a benchmark of Neural Magic's DeepSparse using its built-in deepsparse.benchmark utility and various models from their SparseZoo (https://sparsezoo.neuralmagic.com/). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: ResNet-50, Baseline - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 115.35 59.87 62.88 69.51 74.41
x265 This is a simple test of the x265 encoder run on the CPU with 1080p and 4K options for H.265 video encode performance with x265. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 14.29 25.55 25.45 24.03 27.51 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.0878 0.1756 0.2634 0.3512 0.439 0.112 0.343 0.342 0.390 0.362 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.3 128.0 150.6 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 10.4 74.6 95.5 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.2 74.4 91.2 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.1 61.6 76.0 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.6 76.1 96.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better x265 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
uvg266 uvg266 is an open-source VVC/H.266 (Versatile Video Coding) encoder based on Kvazaar as part of the Ultra Video Group, Tampere University, Finland. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 4 SE +/- 0.06, N = 4 SE +/- 0.04, N = 4 SE +/- 0.14, N = 4 27.29 46.54 44.81 41.02 51.33 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.1427 0.2854 0.4281 0.5708 0.7135 0.184 0.546 0.581 0.623 0.634 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.4 148.0 169.3 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.8 85.3 111.9 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.5 77.1 102.8 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.6 65.8 87.1 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.4 81.0 114.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better uvg266 0.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator LAMMPS is a classical molecular dynamics code, and an acronym for Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: 20k Atoms EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 13.78 18.41 17.42 15.69 25.72 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lm -ldl ns/day Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 Model: 20k Atoms EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.0452 0.0904 0.1356 0.1808 0.226 0.080 0.167 0.181 0.192 0.201 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 23Jun2022 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 65.64 / Avg: 172.36 / Max: 175.68 Min: 13.52 / Avg: 110.02 / Max: 122.84 Min: 13.86 / Avg: 96.46 / Max: 105.29 Min: 12.96 / Avg: 81.74 / Max: 84.69 Min: 12.93 / Avg: 128 / Max: 132.35
Xcompact3d Incompact3d Xcompact3d Incompact3d is a Fortran-MPI based, finite difference high-performance code for solving the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation and as many as you need scalar transport equations. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Neural Magic DeepSparse This is a benchmark of Neural Magic's DeepSparse using its built-in deepsparse.benchmark utility and various models from their SparseZoo (https://sparsezoo.neuralmagic.com/). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 234.02 130.42 139.18 154.28 166.95 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.8 157.0 176.8 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.0 91.9 117.7 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.0 82.6 98.1 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.3 70.8 81.0 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.7 106.4 129.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 Model: CV Detection, YOLOv5s COCO, Sparse INT8 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.50, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 231.40 129.84 138.23 153.40 166.03 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.4 156.5 176.5 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 11.4 91.0 116.6 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.4 82.5 101.3 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.6 69.8 83.0 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.8 105.5 121.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
VVenC VVenC is the Fraunhofer Versatile Video Encoder as a fast/efficient H.266/VVC encoder. The vvenc encoder makes use of SIMD Everywhere (SIMDe). The vvenc software is published under the Clear BSD License. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.044, N = 3 SE +/- 0.010, N = 3 SE +/- 0.030, N = 3 SE +/- 0.030, N = 3 SE +/- 0.012, N = 3 6.358 10.741 10.635 10.291 11.272 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto=auto -fno-fat-lto-objects Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better VVenC 1.9 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Faster EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.0356 0.0712 0.1068 0.1424 0.178 0.049 0.134 0.135 0.147 0.158 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 64.8 129.1 162.9 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 11.8 80.4 107.5 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.1 78.7 103.8 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.9 69.8 89.3 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.0 71.1 115.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better VVenC 1.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
rav1e Xiph rav1e is a Rust-written AV1 video encoder that claims to be the fastest and safest AV1 encoder. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.7 Speed: 10 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.075, N = 4 SE +/- 0.141, N = 4 SE +/- 0.138, N = 4 SE +/- 0.146, N = 4 SE +/- 0.125, N = 5 6.995 11.790 11.818 11.824 12.186 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.7 Speed: 10 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.0509 0.1018 0.1527 0.2036 0.2545 0.079 0.222 0.221 0.226 0.223 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 45.5 88.5 96.7 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.6 53.1 58.3 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.3 53.6 58.5 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.2 52.3 56.9 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.9 54.6 59.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Speedb Speedb is a next-generation key value storage engine that is RocksDB compatible and aiming for stability, efficiency, and performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Speedb 2.7 Test: Update Random EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K SE +/- 190.36, N = 3 SE +/- 579.72, N = 3 SE +/- 167.58, N = 3 SE +/- 863.96, N = 3 SE +/- 2986.90, N = 15 203823 317250 317634 305729 349745 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread Op/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s Per Watt, More Is Better Speedb 2.7 Test: Update Random EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 1640.50 4050.08 4047.08 4423.42 3874.59 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.1 124.2 142.7 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.2 78.3 88.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.6 78.5 88.0 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.9 69.1 79.1 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.1 90.3 116.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Speedb 2.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation This test times how long it takes to build the Linux kernel in a default configuration (defconfig) for the architecture being tested or alternatively an allmodconfig for building all possible kernel modules for the build. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Timed Gem5 Compilation This test times how long it takes to compile Gem5. Gem5 is a simulator for computer system architecture research. Gem5 is widely used for computer architecture research within the industry, academia, and more. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenFOAM OpenFOAM is the leading free, open-source software for computational fluid dynamics (CFD). This test profile currently uses the drivaerFastback test case for analyzing automotive aerodynamics or alternatively the older motorBike input. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OSPRay Intel OSPRay is a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidelity scientific visualizations. OSPRay builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 98.90 147.25 147.28 147.22 164.21 Items Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better OSPRay 2.12 Benchmark: particle_volume/pathtracer/real_time EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.441 0.882 1.323 1.764 2.205 0.651 1.501 1.721 1.960 1.460 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.4 151.9 175.1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.6 98.1 119.5 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.6 85.6 106.9 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.8 75.1 88.1 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 13.8 112.4 131.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenRadioss OpenRadioss is an open-source AGPL-licensed finite element solver for dynamic event analysis OpenRadioss is based on Altair Radioss and open-sourced in 2022. This open-source finite element solver is benchmarked with various example models available from https://www.openradioss.org/models/ and https://github.com/OpenRadioss/ModelExchange/tree/main/Examples. This test is currently using a reference OpenRadioss binary build offered via GitHub. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
rav1e Xiph rav1e is a Rust-written AV1 video encoder that claims to be the fastest and safest AV1 encoder. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.7 Speed: 6 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 1.0953 2.1906 3.2859 4.3812 5.4765 SE +/- 0.020, N = 3 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 SE +/- 0.014, N = 3 SE +/- 0.017, N = 3 SE +/- 0.006, N = 3 2.963 4.706 4.731 4.727 4.868 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.7 Speed: 6 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 0.0203 0.0406 0.0609 0.0812 0.1015 0.032 0.089 0.088 0.090 0.090 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.7 93.2 104.7 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.5 53.1 60.2 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.3 54.0 61.3 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.7 52.4 59.7 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.2 54.2 61.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Quicksilver Quicksilver is a proxy application that represents some elements of the Mercury workload by solving a simplified dynamic Monte Carlo particle transport problem. Quicksilver is developed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and this test profile currently makes use of the OpenMP CPU threaded code path. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit, More Is Better Quicksilver 20230818 Input: CORAL2 P1 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 5M 10M 15M 20M 25M SE +/- 105830.05, N = 3 SE +/- 66583.28, N = 3 SE +/- 106926.77, N = 3 SE +/- 24037.01, N = 3 SE +/- 18559.21, N = 3 13030000 18880000 18950000 18273333 21233333 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -O3 -march=native Figure Of Merit Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit Per Watt, More Is Better Quicksilver 20230818 Input: CORAL2 P1 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K 87231.32 208439.28 208244.59 243826.72 195063.32 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.4 149.4 162.5 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.2 90.6 97.7 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 14.0 91.0 98.6 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.5 74.9 88.5 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.3 108.9 118.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Quicksilver 20230818 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Apache Cassandra This is a benchmark of the Apache Cassandra NoSQL database management system making use of cassandra-stress. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 1316.75, N = 8 SE +/- 371.97, N = 3 SE +/- 522.48, N = 3 SE +/- 423.47, N = 3 SE +/- 1997.81, N = 3 150277 223293 224034 212207 244177 Op/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s Per Watt, More Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 Test: Writes EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 977.63 2451.59 2447.90 2829.25 2486.66 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 63.3 153.7 181.9 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.7 91.1 108.3 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.4 91.5 104.6 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 11.8 75.0 87.7 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 12.5 98.2 123.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Apache Cassandra 4.1.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Apache IoTDB Apache IotDB is a time series database and this benchmark is facilitated using the IoT Benchmaark [https://github.com/thulab/iot-benchmark/]. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M SE +/- 395656.07, N = 3 SE +/- 458351.52, N = 3 SE +/- 1107129.95, N = 12 SE +/- 90002.32, N = 3 SE +/- 820005.27, N = 3 51950735 80321359 70294901 77285152 82731495
Kripke Kripke is a simple, scalable, 3D Sn deterministic particle transport code. Its primary purpose is to research how data layout, programming paradigms and architectures effect the implementation and performance of Sn transport. Kripke is developed by LLNL. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Throughput FoM, More Is Better Kripke 1.2.6 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 60M 120M 180M 240M 300M SE +/- 1494376.42, N = 3 SE +/- 634968.78, N = 3 SE +/- 2369703.74, N = 3 SE +/- 363531.75, N = 3 SE +/- 1948629.96, N = 3 181795967 268773267 258716167 247500133 288394300 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp -ldl Throughput FoM Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Throughput FoM Per Watt, More Is Better Kripke 1.2.6 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K 1133698.87 2566916.47 2674408.73 2943707.26 2490692.28 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 66.0 160.4 176.7 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 12.6 104.7 123.6 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 14.2 96.7 118.5 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 13.0 84.1 103.7 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 14.7 115.8 137.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Kripke 1.2.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Speedb Speedb is a next-generation key value storage engine that is RocksDB compatible and aiming for stability, efficiency, and performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Speedb 2.7 Test: Read Random Write Random EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 4528.27, N = 3 SE +/- 3849.48, N = 3 SE +/- 1300.80, N = 3 SE +/- 1833.01, N = 3 SE +/- 2240.30, N = 3 1447819 2233744 2133311 1982257 2272026 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -lpthread Op/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s Per Watt, More Is Better Speedb 2.7 Test: Read Random Write Random EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K 9121.91 20899.63 22326.89 25808.68 20292.36 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 65.3 158.7 177.5 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C 13.1 106.9 119.8 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W 13.7 95.5 110.7 EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 12.2 76.8 90.2 EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 14.1 112.0 127.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Speedb 2.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenFOAM OpenFOAM is the leading free, open-source software for computational fluid dynamics (CFD). This test profile currently uses the drivaerFastback test case for analyzing automotive aerodynamics or alternatively the older motorBike input. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Mesh Time EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 50 100 150 200 250 229.49 153.15 163.04 172.69 184.16 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++14 -m64 -O3 -ftemplate-depth-100 -fPIC -fuse-ld=bfd -Xlinker --add-needed --no-as-needed -lfoamToVTK -ldynamicMesh -llagrangian -lgenericPatchFields -lfileFormats -lOpenFOAM -ldl -lm
Quicksilver Quicksilver is a proxy application that represents some elements of the Mercury workload by solving a simplified dynamic Monte Carlo particle transport problem. Quicksilver is developed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and this test profile currently makes use of the OpenMP CPU threaded code path. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit, More Is Better Quicksilver 20230818 Input: CTS2 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M SE +/- 54569.02, N = 3 SE +/- 29627.31, N = 3 SE +/- 43333.33, N = 3 SE +/- 25166.11, N = 3 SE +/- 23094.01, N = 3 11443333 14313333 14376667 14030000 16300000 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -O3 -march=native Figure Of Merit Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit Per Watt, More Is Better Quicksilver 20230818 Input: CTS2 EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K 72917.48 156624.76 156169.03 171302.45 144074.42 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Quicksilver 20230818 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 66.78 / Avg: 156.94 / Max: 165.21 Min: 11.82 / Avg: 91.39 / Max: 93.79 Min: 13.73 / Avg: 92.06 / Max: 94.71 Min: 12.79 / Avg: 81.9 / Max: 87.72 Min: 13.67 / Avg: 113.14 / Max: 116.64
CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 32.69 / Avg: 143.24 / Max: 192.83 Min: 6.76 / Avg: 88.61 / Max: 141.34 Min: 11.47 / Avg: 82.06 / Max: 125.14 Min: 6.71 / Avg: 71.8 / Max: 108.62 Min: 6.99 / Avg: 97.94 / Max: 154.25
Xmrig OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 65.67 / Avg: 150.11 / Max: 166.71 Min: 13.6 / Avg: 126.91 / Max: 138.03 Min: 13.02 / Avg: 105.47 / Max: 115 Min: 13.09 / Avg: 89.23 / Max: 95.56 Min: 14.11 / Avg: 131.37 / Max: 143.81
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: KawPow - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40 80 120 160 200 31.23 148.73 171.50 189.15 155.95
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: KawPow - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 218.18, N = 11 SE +/- 43.40, N = 3 SE +/- 61.47, N = 3 SE +/- 33.52, N = 3 SE +/- 5.33, N = 3 4687.9 18875.2 18088.7 16877.9 20487.2 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fexceptions -fno-rtti -maes -O3 -Ofast -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -rdynamic -lssl -lcrypto -luv -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lhwloc H/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: KawPow - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40 80 120 160 200 31.23 148.73 171.50 189.15 155.95 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 65.67 / Avg: 150.11 / Max: 166.71 Min: 13.6 / Avg: 126.91 / Max: 138.03 Min: 13.02 / Avg: 105.47 / Max: 115 Min: 13.09 / Avg: 89.23 / Max: 95.56 Min: 14.11 / Avg: 131.37 / Max: 143.81
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 65.89 / Avg: 152.79 / Max: 165.66 Min: 13.49 / Avg: 127.49 / Max: 138.25 Min: 13.62 / Avg: 104.64 / Max: 114.31 Min: 13.05 / Avg: 88.98 / Max: 95.94 Min: 14.85 / Avg: 130.27 / Max: 143.14
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: CryptoNight-Heavy - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40 80 120 160 200 33.30 148.12 173.49 190.30 157.28
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: CryptoNight-Heavy - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 166.19, N = 12 SE +/- 41.98, N = 3 SE +/- 44.77, N = 3 SE +/- 35.06, N = 3 SE +/- 6.48, N = 3 5087.4 18883.2 18155.0 16932.8 20489.8 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fexceptions -fno-rtti -maes -O3 -Ofast -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -rdynamic -lssl -lcrypto -luv -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lhwloc H/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: CryptoNight-Heavy - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40 80 120 160 200 33.30 148.12 173.49 190.30 157.28 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 65.89 / Avg: 152.79 / Max: 165.66 Min: 13.49 / Avg: 127.49 / Max: 138.25 Min: 13.62 / Avg: 104.64 / Max: 114.31 Min: 13.05 / Avg: 88.98 / Max: 95.94 Min: 14.85 / Avg: 130.27 / Max: 143.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 65.42 / Avg: 152.14 / Max: 165.08 Min: 11.2 / Avg: 126.83 / Max: 137.8 Min: 13.38 / Avg: 104.78 / Max: 115.54 Min: 13.06 / Avg: 89 / Max: 95.54 Min: 14.55 / Avg: 129.79 / Max: 142.64
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: CryptoNight-Femto UPX2 - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40 80 120 160 200 33.27 149.20 172.66 188.75 157.77
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: CryptoNight-Femto UPX2 - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 202.60, N = 12 SE +/- 50.80, N = 3 SE +/- 49.53, N = 3 SE +/- 103.09, N = 3 SE +/- 12.46, N = 3 5061.3 18922.7 18090.9 16799.2 20477.1 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fexceptions -fno-rtti -maes -O3 -Ofast -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -rdynamic -lssl -lcrypto -luv -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lhwloc H/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: CryptoNight-Femto UPX2 - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40 80 120 160 200 33.27 149.20 172.66 188.75 157.77 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 65.42 / Avg: 152.14 / Max: 165.08 Min: 11.2 / Avg: 126.83 / Max: 137.8 Min: 13.38 / Avg: 104.78 / Max: 115.54 Min: 13.06 / Avg: 89 / Max: 95.54 Min: 14.55 / Avg: 129.79 / Max: 142.64
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 66.88 / Avg: 152.27 / Max: 164.27 Min: 12.79 / Avg: 125.59 / Max: 136.69 Min: 12.76 / Avg: 104.07 / Max: 113.63 Min: 12.76 / Avg: 89.32 / Max: 95.35 Min: 13.56 / Avg: 127.44 / Max: 140.88
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40 80 120 160 200 32.66 150.56 174.20 189.12 160.74
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 155.10, N = 12 SE +/- 56.24, N = 3 SE +/- 43.26, N = 3 SE +/- 34.05, N = 3 SE +/- 5.73, N = 3 4973.3 18908.9 18129.0 16892.3 20484.3 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fexceptions -fno-rtti -maes -O3 -Ofast -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -rdynamic -lssl -lcrypto -luv -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lhwloc H/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.21 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 40 80 120 160 200 32.66 150.56 174.20 189.12 160.74 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 66.88 / Avg: 152.27 / Max: 164.27 Min: 12.79 / Avg: 125.59 / Max: 136.69 Min: 12.76 / Avg: 104.07 / Max: 113.63 Min: 12.76 / Avg: 89.32 / Max: 95.35 Min: 13.56 / Avg: 127.44 / Max: 140.88
Llama.cpp OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Llama.cpp b1808 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 64.91 / Avg: 132.4 / Max: 153.98 Min: 11.76 / Avg: 92.91 / Max: 119.13 Min: 12.5 / Avg: 89.09 / Max: 113.31 Min: 12.62 / Avg: 82.44 / Max: 100.45
OpenBenchmarking.org Tokens Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Llama.cpp b1808 Model: llama-2-7b.Q4_0.gguf EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 0.0779 0.1558 0.2337 0.3116 0.3895 0.032 0.320 0.330 0.346
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Tokens Per Second, More Is Better Llama.cpp b1808 Model: llama-2-7b.Q4_0.gguf EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.12, N = 15 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 4.20 29.72 29.38 28.56 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fPIC -O3 -pthread -march=native -mtune=native -lopenblas Tokens Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Tokens Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Llama.cpp b1808 Model: llama-2-7b.Q4_0.gguf EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 0.0779 0.1558 0.2337 0.3116 0.3895 0.032 0.320 0.330 0.346 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Llama.cpp b1808 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 64.91 / Avg: 132.4 / Max: 153.98 Min: 11.76 / Avg: 92.91 / Max: 119.13 Min: 12.5 / Avg: 89.09 / Max: 113.31 Min: 12.62 / Avg: 82.44 / Max: 100.45
EPYC 7601 - Zen 1 Processor: AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core @ 2.20GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN B8026T70AE24HR (V1.02.B10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 8 x 16 GB 2667MT/s Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD, Disk: 1000GB INTEL SSDPE2KX010T8 + 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.6.9-060609-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1 (LLVM 15.0.7 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x800126eJava Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.10)Python Notes: Python 3.11.6Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Mitigation of untrained return thunk; SMT vulnerable + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of Safe RET + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Retpolines IBPB: conditional STIBP: disabled RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 13 January 2024 15:35 by user phoronix.
EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C Processor: AMD EPYC 8324P 32-Core @ 2.65GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: AMD Cinnabar (RCB1009C BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14a4, Memory: 6 x 32 GB DRAM-4800MT/s Samsung M321R4GA0BB0-CQKMG, Disk: 1000GB INTEL SSDPE2KX010T8, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.6.9-060609-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1 (LLVM 15.0.7 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xaa00212Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.10)Python Notes: Python 3.11.6Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of Safe RET + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 12 January 2024 00:50 by user phoronix.
EPYC 8324P - Zen 4C, 155W Processor: AMD EPYC 8324P 32-Core @ 2.65GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: AMD Cinnabar (RCB1009C BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14a4, Memory: 6 x 32 GB DRAM-4800MT/s Samsung M321R4GA0BB0-CQKMG, Disk: 1000GB INTEL SSDPE2KX010T8, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.6.9-060609-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xaa00212Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.10)Python Notes: Python 3.11.6Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of Safe RET + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 12 January 2024 19:57 by user phoronix.
EPYC 8324PN - Zen 4C Processor: AMD EPYC 8534PN 32-Core @ 2.05GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: AMD Cinnabar (RCB1009C BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14a4, Memory: 6 x 32 GB DRAM-4800MT/s Samsung M321R4GA0BB0-CQKMG, Disk: 1000GB INTEL SSDPE2KX010T8, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.6.9-060609-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1 (LLVM 15.0.7 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xaa00212Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.10)Python Notes: Python 3.11.6Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of Safe RET + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 10 January 2024 14:58 by user phoronix.
EPYC 8534PN - Zen 4C Processor: AMD EPYC 8534PN 64-Core @ 2.00GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads), Motherboard: AMD Cinnabar (RCB1009C BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14a4, Memory: 6 x 32 GB DRAM-4800MT/s Samsung M321R4GA0BB0-CQKMG, Disk: 1000GB INTEL SSDPE2KX010T8, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 23.10, Kernel: 6.6.9-060609-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 45.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1 (LLVM 15.0.7 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 13.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-13-XYspKM/gcc-13-13.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xaa00212Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.21+9-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.10)Python Notes: Python 3.11.6Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of Safe RET + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 9 January 2024 15:21 by user phoronix.