AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 - Perf Governor 2 x AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core testing looking at CPU freq invariance on 5.11 with patch. CPU power consumption monitoring via AMD_Energy interface at 1 second polling. Additional data with CPUFreq performance governor included.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2101273-SYST-210125309&sro&grt .
AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 - Perf Governor Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver Compiler File-System Screen Resolution CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2 x AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core @ 3.20GHz (48 Cores / 96 Threads) Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS) AMD Starship/Matisse 16 x 8192 MB DDR4-3200MT/s HMA81GR7CJR8N-XN 1000GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 1TB ASPEED VE228 2 x Intel 10G X550T Ubuntu 20.10 5.11.0-rc4-max-boost-inv-patch (x86_64) 20210121 GNOME Shell 3.38.1 X Server 1.20.9 modesetting 1.20.9 GCC 10.2.0 ext4 1920x1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-10-JvwpWM/gcc-10-10.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-10-JvwpWM/gcc-10-10.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v Disk Details - NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096 Processor Details - CPUFreq Schedutil: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x8301034 - CPUFreq Performance: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x8301034 Java Details - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.10) Python Details - Python 3.8.6 Security Details - itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 - Perf Governor ai-benchmark: Device Inference Score ai-benchmark: Device Training Score ai-benchmark: Device AI Score amg: askap: tConvolve MPI - Gridding askap: tConvolve MPI - Degridding asmfish: 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth astcenc: Thorough astcenc: Exhaustive blender: Barbershop - CPU-Only blogbench: Read brl-cad: VGR Performance Metric build2: Time To Compile byte: Dhrystone 2 v-ray: CPU clomp: Static OMP Speedup cpuminer-opt: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite cpuminer-opt: x25x cpuminer-opt: Garlicoin cpuminer-opt: Skeincoin cpuminer-opt: LBC, LBRY Credits cython-bench: N-Queens dacapobench: H2 dacapobench: Jython dacapobench: Tradebeans dacapobench: Tradesoap dav1d: Summer Nature 4K dav1d: Chimera 1080p 10-bit dolfyn: Computational Fluid Dynamics etcpak: ETC1 etcpak: ETC1 + Dithering etcpak: ETC2 ffte: N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 4096 financebench: Bonds OpenMP financebench: Repo OpenMP gcrypt: gnupg: 2.7GB Sample File Encryption synthmark: VoiceMark_100 gpaw: Carbon Nanotube gromacs: Water Benchmark hint: FLOAT hpcg: himeno: Poisson Pressure Solver influxdb: 4 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 influxdb: 64 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 oidn: Memorial ior: 2MB - Default Test Directory ior: 8MB - Default Test Directory john-the-ripper: MD5 john-the-ripper: Blowfish keydb: lammps: Rhodopsin Protein lammps: 20k Atoms lczero: BLAS lczero: Eigen lulesh: luxcorerender: DLSC luxcorerender: Rainbow Colors and Prism compress-lz4: 1 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 1 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Decompression Speed namd: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms npb: EP.C npb: EP.D npb: LU.C neat: numpy: onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - f32 - CPU onednn: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - f32 - CPU onednn: IP Shapes 1D - f32 - CPU onednn: IP Shapes 3D - f32 - CPU onednn: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - f32 - CPU onnx: yolov4 - OpenMP CPU onnx: super-resolution-10 - OpenMP CPU openfoam: Motorbike 30M openfoam: Motorbike 60M ospray: Magnetic Reconnection - SciVis ospray: Magnetic Reconnection - Path Tracer ospray: XFrog Forest - SciVis ospray: XFrog Forest - Path Tracer ospray: NASA Streamlines - SciVis ospray: NASA Streamlines - Path Tracer ospray: San Miguel - SciVis ospray: San Miguel - Path Tracer plaidml: No - Inference - ResNet 50 - CPU plaidml: No - Inference - VGG16 - CPU plaidml: No - Inference - VGG19 - CPU povray: Trace Time primesieve: 1e12 Prime Number Generation qmcpack: simple-H2O quantlib: qe: AUSURF112 rav1e: 10 rav1e: 6 rav1e: 5 rav1e: 1 redis: SET redis: GET redis: LPUSH redis: SADD relion: Basic - CPU rodinia: OpenMP CFD Solver rodinia: OpenMP LavaMD rodinia: OpenMP Leukocyte rodinia: OpenMP Streamcluster rodinia: OpenMP HotSpot3D simdjson: PartialTweets simdjson: LargeRand simdjson: Kostya simdjson: DistinctUserID sqlite-speedtest: Timed Time - Size 1,000 stockfish: Total Time svt-av1: Enc Mode 8 - 1080p svt-av1: Enc Mode 4 - 1080p svt-av1: Enc Mode 0 - 1080p svt-vp9: Visual Quality Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p svt-vp9: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p svt-vp9: VMAF Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p swet: Average tachyon: Total Time tensorflow-lite: Mobilenet Float tensorflow-lite: Mobilenet Quant tensorflow-lite: NASNet Mobile tensorflow-lite: SqueezeNet tensorflow-lite: Inception ResNet V2 tensorflow-lite: Inception V4 build-gdb: Time To Compile build-godot: Time To Compile build-linux-kernel: Time To Compile build-llvm: Time To Compile mrbayes: Primate Phylogeny Analysis tnn: CPU - MobileNet v2 tnn: CPU - SqueezeNet v1.1 tscp: AI Chess Performance ttsiod-renderer: Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping tungsten: Hair tungsten: Water Caustic tungsten: Volumetric Caustic x265: Bosphorus 1080p x265: Bosphorus 4K yafaray: Total Time For Sample Scene compress-zstd: 3 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1720 1067 2787 1448718333 7453.51 11944.2 117632955 5.65 40.97 156.83 1103118 636521 67.322 38319339.8 53460 47.8 296995 1541.76 9949.88 364017 139037 26.604 5217 4778 5591 5148 317.45 133.37 18.652 267.587 245.595 155.798 178738.12497094 17015 56769.453125 39406.757812 232.542 77.179 714.914 59.851 5.261 323144417.17197 30.8262 4286.628309 812193.6 1256112.1 28.39 475.25 520.72 4612308 72636 294214.37 23.787 25.077 4061 4433 19771.223 7.80 8.76 9757.17 11305.0 48.95 10666.0 47.76 10489.8 0.44472 3841.48 3863.45 154376.76 24.633 323.00 0.863782 2.33290 1.55447 0.849248 0.521968 1123.32 181 4210 18.30 128.28 32.62 250 11.19 5.95 71.43 16.39 54.97 4.32 4.63 25.42 22.49 11.305 4.535 29.281 2157.2 1171.03 3.054 1.408 1.068 0.372 1427348.10 1711621.52 1217218.75 1611164.34 348.294 8.882 52.092 52.684 10.338 96.603 0.63 0.36 0.57 0.65 70.540 97042601 68.231 7.648 0.091 323.81 371.48 364.81 687480262 18.0565 39523.5 41034.0 134044 62195.4 736285 810750 92.916 59.177 25.752 208.786 82.042 289.764 274.869 1114562 655.225 6.69036 21.3329 5.26235 49.45 19.74 87.143 8270.5 1775 1133 2908 1444174667 7441.95 11492.9 117370871 5.67 41.07 158.07 1086347 635725 67.334 38656226.3 55014 47.4 420231 1537.52 9964.35 522948 194087 26.895 4570 4740 4671 4621 363.33 181.95 18.635 267.136 245.453 155.783 180037.95358586 17335 56094.488281 39948.356771 232.760 77.022 714.181 59.757 5.255 322775283.80125 30.9260 4135.519154 956189.4 1360163.0 28.33 517.33 539.63 4762000 71757 303171.33 24.639 25.116 4147 4450 19334.862 7.89 8.76 9651.61 11150.6 49.29 10410.3 48.02 10555.1 0.44469 3857.33 3867.30 153770.57 25.037 324.48 0.867545 2.30467 1.57963 0.813628 0.514604 1247.48 185 4190 18.29 128.81 32.80 333.33 11.19 5.95 71.43 16.39 55.56 4.33 4.66 25.22 22.43 11.427 4.489 28.971 2156.3 1249.06 3.177 1.446 1.095 0.375 1454741.42 1782755.97 1251006.00 1610484.50 348.338 8.510 52.360 51.290 10.432 96.885 0.63 0.37 0.57 0.65 69.883 96082114 68.465 7.488 0.091 309.61 363.18 346.71 686132109 18.2004 39981.9 41180.1 132844 61347.2 737993 818887 85.277 58.746 25.414 208.043 82.261 297.132 274.097 1116255 665.448 6.69505 21.4652 5.31183 62.29 20.75 87.331 7770.3 OpenBenchmarking.org
AI Benchmark Alpha Device Inference Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Inference Score CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1775 1720
AI Benchmark Alpha Device Training Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Training Score CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 200 400 600 800 1000 1133 1067
AI Benchmark Alpha Device AI Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device AI Score CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 2908 2787
AI Benchmark Alpha Device AI Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device AI Score CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 11.59 12.98
AI Benchmark Alpha CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 250.8 388.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 214.7 378.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300M 600M 900M 1200M 1500M SE +/- 4018322.42, N = 3 SE +/- 750486.58, N = 3 1444174667 1448718333 1. (CC) gcc options: -lparcsr_ls -lparcsr_mv -lseq_mv -lIJ_mv -lkrylov -lHYPRE_utilities -lm -fopenmp -pthread -lmpi
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit Per Watt, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1000K 2000K 3000K 4000K 5000K 4634187.41 4631994.74
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 77.8 309.8 419.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 76.7 312.8 412.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second, More Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 7.65, N = 3 SE +/- 2.90, N = 3 7441.95 7453.51 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second, More Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 137.09, N = 3 SE +/- 6.47, N = 3 11492.9 11944.2 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 9 18 27 36 45 33.50 40.51
ASKAP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.5 343.1 458.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.8 294.9 460.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
asmFish 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes/second, More Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30M 60M 90M 120M 150M SE +/- 1411556.16, N = 4 SE +/- 358515.89, N = 3 117370871 117632955
asmFish 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes/second Per Watt, More Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K 251626.25 259519.18
asmFish CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.2 466.4 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 453.3 491.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
ASTC Encoder Preset: Thorough OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Thorough CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.2758 2.5516 3.8274 5.1032 6.379 SE +/- 0.01, N = 5 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 5.67 5.65 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++14 -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -flto -mfpmath=sse -mavx2 -mpopcnt -lpthread
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.3 247.5 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 217.2 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
ASTC Encoder Preset: Exhaustive OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Exhaustive CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 41.07 40.97 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++14 -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -flto -mfpmath=sse -mavx2 -mpopcnt -lpthread
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 417.1 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 383.9 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Blender Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.90 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.95, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 158.07 156.83
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.2 434.6 494.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 423.5 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.90 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 13508.02, N = 3 SE +/- 1738.41, N = 3 1086347 1103118 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score Per Watt, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 4638.96 4752.60
BlogBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 234.2 328.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 232.1 341.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better BlogBench 1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
BRL-CAD VGR Performance Metric OpenBenchmarking.org VGR Performance Metric, More Is Better BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K 635725 636521 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fexceptions -ftemplate-depth-128 -m64 -ggdb3 -O3 -fipa-pta -fstrength-reduce -finline-functions -flto -pedantic -rdynamic -lSM -lICE -lXi -lGLU -lGL -lGLdispatch -lX11 -lXext -lXrender -lpthread -ldl -luuid -lm
BRL-CAD VGR Performance Metric OpenBenchmarking.org VGR Performance Metric Per Watt, More Is Better BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 1355.13 1369.51
BRL-CAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.4 469.1 492.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 464.8 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better BRL-CAD 7.30.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Build2 Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.13 Time To Compile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 67.33 67.32
Build2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.9 256.5 506.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 244.2 493.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
BYTE Unix Benchmark Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 OpenBenchmarking.org LPS, More Is Better BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 8M 16M 24M 32M 40M SE +/- 498492.56, N = 3 SE +/- 341040.65, N = 3 38656226.3 38319339.8
BYTE Unix Benchmark Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 OpenBenchmarking.org LPS Per Watt, More Is Better BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K 307169.01 306193.49
BYTE Unix Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.0 125.8 133.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 125.1 132.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Ksamples, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 503.58, N = 3 SE +/- 1018.74, N = 13 55014 53460
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Ksamples Per Watt, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 130.65 127.59
Chaos Group V-RAY CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 421.1 492.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 419.0 492.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
CLOMP Static OMP Speedup OpenBenchmarking.org Speedup, More Is Better CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 47.4 47.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -lm
CLOMP Static OMP Speedup OpenBenchmarking.org Speedup Per Watt, More Is Better CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0698 0.1396 0.2094 0.2792 0.349 0.31 0.31
CLOMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 151.3 312.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 152.6 321.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better CLOMP 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 59.74 / Avg: 285.23 / Max: 514.05 Min: 59.88 / Avg: 280.92 / Max: 530.69
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 19086.02, N = 12 SE +/- 5314.19, N = 12 420231 296995 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 2898.85 2358.08
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.9 145.0 174.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 125.9 138.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: x25x OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 11.04, N = 12 SE +/- 17.73, N = 15 1537.52 1541.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: x25x OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 6.04 6.08
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.5 254.4 424.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 253.8 480.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Garlicoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 155.17, N = 14 SE +/- 99.38, N = 15 9964.35 9949.88 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Garlicoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 13 26 39 52 65 57.99 59.91
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.5 171.8 441.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 75.9 166.1 473.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Skeincoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 110K 220K 330K 440K 550K SE +/- 9614.65, N = 12 SE +/- 5604.68, N = 12 522948 364017 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Skeincoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3625.65 2897.78
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 72.0 144.2 193.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 125.6 144.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 861.90, N = 3 SE +/- 1380.06, N = 3 194087 139037 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 1315.46 1091.62
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.6 147.5 245.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 127.4 169.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Cython Benchmark Test: N-Queens OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 26.90 26.60
Cython Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.3 130.1 133.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 129.5 131.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: H2 OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 70.06, N = 20 SE +/- 73.65, N = 20 4570 5217
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 139.4 180.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 60.6 134.4 163.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Jython OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 20.83, N = 6 SE +/- 43.93, N = 6 4740 4778
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 138.2 194.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 137.8 195.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradebeans OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 52.34, N = 20 SE +/- 66.39, N = 20 4671 5591
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 149.7 216.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 140.5 200.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradesoap OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 42.72, N = 5 SE +/- 61.21, N = 4 4621 5148
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.2 171.7 314.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 165.5 309.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 3.54, N = 15 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 363.33 317.45 MIN: 186.32 / MAX: 403.05 MIN: 173.69 / MAX: 340.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.414 0.828 1.242 1.656 2.07 1.84 1.72
dav1d CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 197.5 386.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 184.4 344.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 181.95 133.37 MIN: 125.32 / MAX: 275.36 MIN: 92.59 / MAX: 205.11 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.2723 0.5446 0.8169 1.0892 1.3615 1.21 0.92
dav1d CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.6 150.2 248.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 144.8 190.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Dolfyn Computational Fluid Dynamics OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.64 18.65
Dolfyn CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 129.9 132.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 130.2 133.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Dolfyn 0.527 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 267.14 267.59 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s Per Watt, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.4748 0.9496 1.4244 1.8992 2.374 2.11 2.10
Etcpak CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 126.8 129.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.5 127.5 129.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 245.45 245.60 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s Per Watt, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.4343 0.8686 1.3029 1.7372 2.1715 1.93 1.91
Etcpak CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 127.0 129.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.6 128.2 130.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Etcpak Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 155.78 155.80 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s Per Watt, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.2745 0.549 0.8235 1.098 1.3725 1.22 1.21
Etcpak CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 127.4 128.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 128.7 130.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
FFTE N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 1616.93, N = 15 SE +/- 1760.31, N = 15 180037.95 178738.12 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fopenmp
FFTE N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 140 280 420 560 700 664.85 656.40
FFTE CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.3 270.8 488.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.3 272.3 488.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFTE 7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 199.64, N = 9 SE +/- 213.45, N = 3 17335 17015 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops Per Watt, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 131.21 127.83
FFTW CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 65.17 / Avg: 132.11 / Max: 150.06 Min: 120.07 / Avg: 133.11 / Max: 142.83
FinanceBench Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 365.12, N = 3 SE +/- 598.50, N = 3 56094.49 56769.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
FinanceBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 171.0 184.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 171.1 185.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
FinanceBench Benchmark: Repo OpenMP OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 456.10, N = 3 SE +/- 393.10, N = 3 39948.36 39406.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
FinanceBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 168.6 185.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 169.8 186.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Gcrypt Library OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Gcrypt Library 1.9 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 SE +/- 0.81, N = 3 232.76 232.54 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -fvisibility=hidden -lgpg-error
Gcrypt Library CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 63.3 127.6 131.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 129.2 133.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Gcrypt Library 1.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
GnuPG 2.7GB Sample File Encryption OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 77.02 77.18 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2
GnuPG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 129.3 132.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 129.8 131.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GnuPG 2.2.27 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Google SynthMark Test: VoiceMark_100 OpenBenchmarking.org Voices, More Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 1.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 714.18 714.91 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -std=c++11 -Ofast
Google SynthMark Test: VoiceMark_100 OpenBenchmarking.org Voices Per Watt, More Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.2533 2.5066 3.7599 5.0132 6.2665 5.57 5.54
Google SynthMark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.0 128.2 130.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.8 129.0 131.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
GPAW Input: Carbon Nanotube OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GPAW 20.1 Input: Carbon Nanotube CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 59.76 59.85 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -shared -fwrapv -O2 -lxc -lblas -lmpi
GPAW CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.3 403.9 464.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 404.8 464.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GPAW 20.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
GROMACS Water Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day, More Is Better GROMACS 2020.3 Water Benchmark CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.1837 2.3674 3.5511 4.7348 5.9185 SE +/- 0.021, N = 3 SE +/- 0.022, N = 3 5.255 5.261 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lrt -lpthread -lm
GROMACS Water Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day Per Watt, More Is Better GROMACS 2020.3 Water Benchmark CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
GROMACS CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.4 424.3 488.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.3 421.6 491.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GROMACS 2020.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Hierarchical INTegration Test: FLOAT OpenBenchmarking.org QUIPs, More Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70M 140M 210M 280M 350M SE +/- 201175.83, N = 3 SE +/- 122621.60, N = 3 322775283.80 323144417.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lm
Hierarchical INTegration Test: FLOAT OpenBenchmarking.org QUIPs Per Watt, More Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 2527557.17 2496420.85
Hierarchical INTegration CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 64.2 127.7 129.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 64.8 129.4 131.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
High Performance Conjugate Gradient OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 30.93 30.83 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
High Performance Conjugate Gradient OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s Per Watt, More Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0203 0.0406 0.0609 0.0812 0.1015 0.09 0.08
High Performance Conjugate Gradient CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 363.8 399.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 363.8 391.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 27.09, N = 3 SE +/- 25.26, N = 3 4135.52 4286.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -mavx2
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 7 14 21 28 35 31.13 31.94
Himeno Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.2 132.8 135.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 134.2 136.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 2401.68, N = 3 SE +/- 1525.09, N = 3 956189.4 812193.6
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec Per Watt, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 4963.60 4857.31
InfluxDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 192.6 218.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 167.2 187.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 9433.94, N = 3 SE +/- 2545.78, N = 3 1360163.0 1256112.1
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec Per Watt, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 6626.07 6672.14
InfluxDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.9 205.3 232.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 188.3 217.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Intel Open Image Denoise Scene: Memorial OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.17, N = 6 SE +/- 0.04, N = 6 28.33 28.39
Intel Open Image Denoise Scene: Memorial OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 0.08 0.08
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 346.7 488.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 346.7 488.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
IOR Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 5.48, N = 3 SE +/- 2.06, N = 3 517.33 475.25 MIN: 463.44 / MAX: 1007.52 MIN: 400.96 / MAX: 971.55 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -pthread -lmpi
IOR Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.594 1.188 1.782 2.376 2.97 2.64 2.43
IOR CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 196.2 215.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 195.2 214.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better IOR 3.3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
IOR Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 5.78, N = 3 SE +/- 2.63, N = 3 539.63 520.72 MIN: 280.44 / MAX: 1002.78 MIN: 176.53 / MAX: 1089.46 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -pthread -lmpi
IOR Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.5738 1.1476 1.7214 2.2952 2.869 2.55 2.49
IOR CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.4 211.4 225.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 209.5 223.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better IOR 3.3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
John The Ripper Test: MD5 OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1000K 2000K 3000K 4000K 5000K SE +/- 7371.11, N = 3 SE +/- 54344.04, N = 13 4762000 4612308 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -pthread -lm -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2
John The Ripper Test: MD5 OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10378.20 10084.88
John The Ripper CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 122.4 458.8 492.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 122.0 457.3 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
John The Ripper Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K SE +/- 507.10, N = 3 SE +/- 73.45, N = 3 71757 72636 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -pthread -lm -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2
John The Ripper Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40 80 120 160 200 183.88 185.47
John The Ripper CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 122.1 390.2 430.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 391.6 433.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
KeyDB OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 5131.54, N = 15 SE +/- 3012.50, N = 15 303171.33 294214.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
KeyDB OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec Per Watt, More Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1761.51 1865.16
KeyDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 60.8 172.1 190.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 64.4 157.7 178.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: Rhodopsin Protein OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.19, N = 15 SE +/- 0.17, N = 12 24.64 23.79 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lm
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: Rhodopsin Protein OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0315 0.063 0.0945 0.126 0.1575 0.14 0.13
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.5 176.0 401.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 176.6 409.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: 20k Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 25.12 25.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lm
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: 20k Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0135 0.027 0.0405 0.054 0.0675 0.06 0.06
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.0 427.6 439.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 428.6 441.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
LeelaChessZero Backend: BLAS OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: BLAS CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 17.79, N = 3 SE +/- 49.90, N = 9 4147 4061 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -pthread
LeelaChessZero Backend: BLAS OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: BLAS CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 9.72 9.72
LeelaChessZero CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.0 426.6 492.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 417.7 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: Eigen CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 26.71, N = 3 SE +/- 36.23, N = 3 4450 4433 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -pthread
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: Eigen CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 10.39 10.45
LeelaChessZero CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.9 428.4 492.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.4 424.2 492.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LULESH OpenBenchmarking.org z/s, More Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 182.76, N = 5 SE +/- 171.84, N = 5 19334.86 19771.22 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp -lm -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
LULESH OpenBenchmarking.org z/s Per Watt, More Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 78.80 80.77
LULESH CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.7 245.4 341.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 244.8 342.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
LuxCoreRender Scene: DLSC OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 7.89 7.80 MIN: 7.67 / MAX: 8.57 MIN: 7.61 / MAX: 8.59
LuxCoreRender Scene: DLSC OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0045 0.009 0.0135 0.018 0.0225 0.02 0.02
LuxCoreRender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 122.0 458.4 493.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 459.0 493.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LuxCoreRender Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 8.76 8.76 MIN: 8.22 / MAX: 8.86 MIN: 8.31 / MAX: 8.97
LuxCoreRender Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0045 0.009 0.0135 0.018 0.0225 0.02 0.02
LuxCoreRender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 122.2 461.6 493.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.7 461.8 493.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 71.91, N = 3 SE +/- 19.43, N = 3 9651.61 9757.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 110.98, N = 3 SE +/- 25.21, N = 3 11150.6 11305.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 81.46 81.34
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 71.1 136.9 143.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 139.0 145.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.52, N = 5 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 49.29 48.95 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 61.51, N = 5 SE +/- 60.61, N = 3 10410.3 10666.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 79.05 80.07
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 131.7 143.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 133.2 144.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 48.02 47.76 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 96.09, N = 3 SE +/- 31.24, N = 3 10555.1 10489.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 80.12 78.46
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 131.7 143.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 133.7 144.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
NAMD ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1001 0.2002 0.3003 0.4004 0.5005 SE +/- 0.00075, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00005, N = 3 0.44469 0.44472
NAMD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 122.0 422.4 492.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 423.2 492.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 4.01, N = 10 SE +/- 5.01, N = 10 3857.33 3841.48 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz 2. Open MPI 4.0.3
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 17.84 17.62
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 216.2 410.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 218.1 411.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.D OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 2.74, N = 3 SE +/- 2.97, N = 3 3867.30 3863.45 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz 2. Open MPI 4.0.3
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.D OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 10.29 10.24
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.4 375.8 430.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 377.2 446.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: LU.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 121.33, N = 4 SE +/- 509.59, N = 4 153770.57 154376.76 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz 2. Open MPI 4.0.3
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: LU.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 100 200 300 400 500 466.44 469.62
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.1 329.7 405.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 328.7 407.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.62, N = 14 SE +/- 0.56, N = 12 25.04 24.63 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -ffree-line-length-0 -Jsource/ -fopenmp -O3 -fno-backtrace
Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.5 178.5 280.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 179.4 280.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Numpy Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 324.48 323.00
Numpy Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.5535 1.107 1.6605 2.214 2.7675 2.46 2.43
Numpy Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 131.7 141.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 133.2 142.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1952 0.3904 0.5856 0.7808 0.976 SE +/- 0.001697, N = 7 SE +/- 0.001510, N = 7 0.867545 0.863782 MIN: 0.78 MIN: 0.79 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.8 332.1 492.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 331.1 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
oneDNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.5249 1.0498 1.5747 2.0996 2.6245 SE +/- 0.02560, N = 15 SE +/- 0.01587, N = 3 2.30467 2.33290 MIN: 1.88 MIN: 2 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.0 284.2 491.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.8 285.6 468.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.3554 0.7108 1.0662 1.4216 1.777 SE +/- 0.01359, N = 4 SE +/- 0.01340, N = 4 1.57963 1.55447 MIN: 1.31 MIN: 1.29 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.0 280.4 481.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 279.6 482.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1911 0.3822 0.5733 0.7644 0.9555 SE +/- 0.005456, N = 5 SE +/- 0.004000, N = 5 0.813628 0.849248 MIN: 0.69 MIN: 0.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.1 239.4 430.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 235.0 415.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
oneDNN Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1174 0.2348 0.3522 0.4696 0.587 SE +/- 0.005906, N = 4 SE +/- 0.004601, N = 4 0.514604 0.521968 MIN: 0.43 MIN: 0.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.7 278.8 480.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 274.8 455.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 35.45, N = 15 SE +/- 3.00, N = 3 1247.48 1123.32 MIN: 1069.01 MIN: 1077.56 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 120.77 / Avg: 339.16 / Max: 492.27 Min: 120.62 / Avg: 341.54 / Max: 492.22
ONNX Runtime Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.62, N = 3 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 185 181 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -ldl -lrt
ONNX Runtime Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1575 0.315 0.4725 0.63 0.7875 0.70 0.69
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.3 263.5 278.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.1 263.9 279.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
ONNX Runtime Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 68.07, N = 12 SE +/- 44.10, N = 3 4190 4210 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -ldl -lrt
ONNX Runtime Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 15.49 15.26
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 50 100 150 200 250 Min: 121.3 / Avg: 270.44 / Max: 293.8 Min: 121.22 / Avg: 275.85 / Max: 301.54
OpenFOAM Input: Motorbike 30M OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 18.29 18.30 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -m64 -O3 -ftemplate-depth-100 -fPIC -fuse-ld=bfd -Xlinker --add-needed --no-as-needed -lfoamToVTK -ldynamicMesh -llagrangian -lgenericPatchFields -lfileFormats -lOpenFOAM -ldl -lm
OpenFOAM CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.9 309.6 472.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.2 309.5 472.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
OpenFOAM Input: Motorbike 60M OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 60M CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 128.81 128.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -m64 -O3 -ftemplate-depth-100 -fPIC -fuse-ld=bfd -Xlinker --add-needed --no-as-needed -lfoamToVTK -ldynamicMesh -llagrangian -lgenericPatchFields -lfileFormats -lOpenFOAM -ldl -lm
OpenFOAM CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.1 290.0 399.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 290.6 400.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.24, N = 6 SE +/- 0.23, N = 6 32.80 32.62 MIN: 13.16 / MAX: 34.48 MIN: 12.82 / MAX: 33.33
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0248 0.0496 0.0744 0.0992 0.124 0.10 0.11
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 314.6 450.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.6 309.6 449.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.00, N = 11 333.33 250.00 MIN: 100 / MAX: 500 MIN: 90.91 / MAX: 333.33
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.4478 0.8956 1.3434 1.7912 2.239 1.99 1.65
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.4 167.3 303.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 151.8 245.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 11.19 11.19 MIN: 7.87 / MAX: 11.36 MIN: 8.2 / MAX: 11.36
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0068 0.0136 0.0204 0.0272 0.034 0.03 0.03
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.1 378.9 489.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 379.8 489.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.3388 2.6776 4.0164 5.3552 6.694 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 5.95 5.95 MIN: 5.46 / MAX: 6.02 MIN: 5.35 / MAX: 6.02
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.9 421.1 490.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 420.8 490.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.00, N = 7 SE +/- 0.00, N = 7 71.43 71.43 MIN: 19.61 / MAX: 76.92 MIN: 19.61 / MAX: 76.92
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0675 0.135 0.2025 0.27 0.3375 0.30 0.30
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.3 241.6 481.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.4 238.8 480.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 16.39 16.39 MIN: 10.31 / MAX: 16.95 MIN: 10.99 / MAX: 16.95
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0113 0.0226 0.0339 0.0452 0.0565 0.05 0.05
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.7 362.0 487.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 361.1 488.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 5 55.56 54.97 MIN: 33.33 / MAX: 58.82 MIN: 31.25 / MAX: 58.82
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0743 0.1486 0.2229 0.2972 0.3715 0.33 0.32
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.6 168.2 482.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 171.8 482.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.9743 1.9486 2.9229 3.8972 4.8715 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 4.33 4.32 MIN: 3.65 / MAX: 4.37 MIN: 3.76 / MAX: 4.37
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.1 343.6 488.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 341.0 480.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.0485 2.097 3.1455 4.194 5.2425 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 4.66 4.63
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0068 0.0136 0.0204 0.0272 0.034 0.03 0.03
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 82.95 / Avg: 160.37 / Max: 200.84 Min: 77.57 / Avg: 156.39 / Max: 196.21
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.24, N = 15 SE +/- 0.30, N = 15 25.22 25.42
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0203 0.0406 0.0609 0.0812 0.1015 0.09 0.09
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60 120 180 240 300 Min: 120.32 / Avg: 284.73 / Max: 343.46 Min: 120.47 / Avg: 284.69 / Max: 345.62
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.20, N = 15 SE +/- 0.16, N = 15 22.43 22.49
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 0.08 0.08
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 121.23 / Avg: 291.09 / Max: 365.95 Min: 120.81 / Avg: 287.74 / Max: 365.75
POV-Ray Trace Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 SE +/- 0.05, N = 4 11.43 11.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -pthread -lSDL -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lIlmImf -lIlmImf-2_5 -lImath-2_5 -lHalf-2_5 -lIex-2_5 -lIexMath-2_5 -lIlmThread-2_5 -lIlmThread -ltiff -ljpeg -lpng -lz -lrt -lm -lboost_thread -lboost_system
POV-Ray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.6 327.6 492.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 329.6 492.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Primesieve 1e12 Prime Number Generation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 7.4 1e12 Prime Number Generation CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.0204 2.0408 3.0612 4.0816 5.102 SE +/- 0.008, N = 8 SE +/- 0.015, N = 8 4.489 4.535 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lpthread
Primesieve CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.3 310.0 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 309.6 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 7.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
QMCPACK Input: simple-H2O OpenBenchmarking.org Total Execution Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 28.97 29.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -finline-limit=1000 -fstrict-aliasing -funroll-all-loops -march=native -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -pthread -lm
QMCPACK CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.6 438.1 491.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 437.6 491.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
QuantLib OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 16.02, N = 3 SE +/- 8.27, N = 3 2156.3 2157.2 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic
QuantLib OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 16.49 16.34
QuantLib CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.3 130.8 133.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 132.0 134.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Quantum ESPRESSO Input: AUSURF112 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 Input: AUSURF112 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 19.05, N = 9 SE +/- 12.21, N = 4 1249.06 1171.03 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -lopenblas -lFoX_dom -lFoX_sax -lFoX_wxml -lFoX_common -lFoX_utils -lFoX_fsys -lfftw3 -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz
Quantum ESPRESSO CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 70.27 / Avg: 389.94 / Max: 492.33 Min: 120.56 / Avg: 385.69 / Max: 492.5
rav1e Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.7148 1.4296 2.1444 2.8592 3.574 SE +/- 0.018, N = 3 SE +/- 0.008, N = 3 3.177 3.054
rav1e Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0045 0.009 0.0135 0.018 0.0225 0.02 0.02
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 138.6 146.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 136.5 145.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
rav1e Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.3254 0.6508 0.9762 1.3016 1.627 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 1.446 1.408
rav1e Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 74.7 143.0 152.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 74.9 142.0 151.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
rav1e Speed: 5 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.2464 0.4928 0.7392 0.9856 1.232 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 1.095 1.068
rav1e Speed: 5 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 143.6 155.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 143.3 155.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
rav1e Speed: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0844 0.1688 0.2532 0.3376 0.422 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.375 0.372
rav1e Speed: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 148.6 157.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 147.6 157.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: SET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 10017.79, N = 13 SE +/- 13176.39, N = 15 1454741.42 1427348.10 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
Redis Test: SET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 11683.85 11500.61
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 124.5 135.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 124.1 134.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: GET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 32510.57, N = 12 SE +/- 12716.89, N = 11 1782755.97 1711621.52 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
Redis Test: GET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 14375.86 13846.04
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 124.0 135.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 123.6 133.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: LPUSH OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 11397.44, N = 3 SE +/- 13782.67, N = 3 1251006.00 1217218.75 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
Redis Test: LPUSH OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10016.27 9780.17
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 124.9 134.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 124.5 132.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: SADD OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 17675.25, N = 15 SE +/- 15585.71, N = 4 1610484.50 1611164.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
Redis Test: SADD OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 12966.74 13036.25
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 124.2 136.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.6 123.6 132.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
RELION Test: Basic - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 Test: Basic - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 3.10, N = 9 SE +/- 2.97, N = 9 348.34 348.29 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -std=c++0x -O3 -rdynamic -ldl -ltiff -lfftw3f -lfftw3 -lpng -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
RELION CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 119.71 / Avg: 480.54 / Max: 494.18 Min: 119.68 / Avg: 480.3 / Max: 492.94
Rodinia Test: OpenMP CFD Solver OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.053, N = 5 SE +/- 0.141, N = 15 8.510 8.882 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.9 253.1 370.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 253.4 373.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Rodinia Test: OpenMP LavaMD OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 52.36 52.09 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 433.4 492.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 430.6 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Rodinia Test: OpenMP Leukocyte OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.69, N = 3 51.29 52.68 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.4 285.4 336.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 281.6 334.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Rodinia Test: OpenMP Streamcluster OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 5 SE +/- 0.03, N = 5 10.43 10.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.7 216.9 281.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 215.0 284.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Rodinia Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 SE +/- 0.59, N = 3 96.89 96.60 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 156.2 253.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 157.6 257.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
simdjson Throughput Test: PartialTweets OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: PartialTweets CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1418 0.2836 0.4254 0.5672 0.709 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.63 0.63 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
simdjson Throughput Test: PartialTweets OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: PartialTweets CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.4 128.3 129.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 128.6 130.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: LargeRandom OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: LargeRandom CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0833 0.1666 0.2499 0.3332 0.4165 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.37 0.36 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
simdjson Throughput Test: LargeRandom OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: LargeRandom CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 128.6 131.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 129.9 132.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: Kostya OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: Kostya CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1283 0.2566 0.3849 0.5132 0.6415 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.57 0.57 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
simdjson Throughput Test: Kostya OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: Kostya CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 128.9 131.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 130.5 132.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: DistinctUserID OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1463 0.2926 0.4389 0.5852 0.7315 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.65 0.65 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
simdjson Throughput Test: DistinctUserID OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 128.1 129.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 129.7 130.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
SQLite Speedtest Timed Time - Size 1,000 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 69.88 70.54 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lz -lpthread
SQLite Speedtest CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 129.6 131.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 131.3 133.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Stockfish Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Stockfish 12 Total Time CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M SE +/- 1344259.09, N = 3 SE +/- 769788.53, N = 3 96082114 97042601 1. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++17 -pedantic -O3 -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -msse4.1 -mssse3 -msse2 -flto -flto=jobserver
Stockfish Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Stockfish 12 Total Time CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K 218753.45 220989.94
Stockfish CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 439.2 492.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 60.1 439.1 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stockfish 12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.65, N = 15 SE +/- 1.05, N = 15 68.47 68.23 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0743 0.1486 0.2229 0.2972 0.3715 0.33 0.33
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.4 207.6 386.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 209.8 388.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.031, N = 4 SE +/- 0.029, N = 4 7.488 7.648 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0068 0.0136 0.0204 0.0272 0.034 0.03 0.03
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.0 227.7 514.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 229.6 530.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0205 0.041 0.0615 0.082 0.1025 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 12 0.091 0.091 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 152.9 301.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 73.8 154.7 305.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
SVT-VP9 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 15.29, N = 15 SE +/- 4.21, N = 15 309.61 323.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
SVT-VP9 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.3915 0.783 1.1745 1.566 1.9575 1.68 1.74
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.5 184.0 372.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.4 185.8 379.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
SVT-VP9 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.84, N = 9 SE +/- 1.70, N = 9 363.18 371.48 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
SVT-VP9 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.4748 0.9496 1.4244 1.8992 2.374 2.07 2.11
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 175.3 361.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 176.2 363.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
SVT-VP9 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 2.58, N = 15 SE +/- 0.91, N = 10 346.71 364.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
SVT-VP9 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.468 0.936 1.404 1.872 2.34 1.97 2.08
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 175.7 352.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 175.7 360.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Swet Average OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Swet 1.5.16 Average CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 150M 300M 450M 600M 750M SE +/- 3454923.88, N = 3 SE +/- 1732499.41, N = 3 686132109 687480262 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -lcurses -lrt
Swet Average OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Swet 1.5.16 Average CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.2M 2.4M 3.6M 4.8M 6M 5450163.70 5408272.60
Swet CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 125.9 128.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 127.1 130.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Swet 1.5.16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Tachyon Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 18.20 18.06 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -ltachyon -lm -lpthread
Tachyon CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.0 397.8 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 402.8 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tachyon 0.99b6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
TensorFlow Lite Model: Mobilenet Float OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Float CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 473.02, N = 3 SE +/- 395.37, N = 3 39981.9 39523.5
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 451.8 481.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 451.2 480.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite Model: Mobilenet Quant OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Quant CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 211.03, N = 3 SE +/- 400.94, N = 6 41180.1 41034.0
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.6 453.0 481.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.2 453.6 483.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite Model: NASNet Mobile OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: NASNet Mobile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 2146.20, N = 15 SE +/- 2393.85, N = 15 132844 134044
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.8 401.7 439.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 403.7 446.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite Model: SqueezeNet OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: SqueezeNet CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 715.70, N = 4 SE +/- 412.91, N = 15 61347.2 62195.4
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.9 451.3 481.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.4 449.5 481.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite Model: Inception ResNet V2 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception ResNet V2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 2132.19, N = 3 SE +/- 5824.36, N = 9 737993 736285
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.8 439.4 470.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 442.7 471.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite Model: Inception V4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception V4 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 4685.69, N = 3 SE +/- 1163.43, N = 3 818887 810750
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.7 429.0 458.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 431.6 460.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 Time To Compile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 85.28 92.92
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.7 167.0 492.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 159.2 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 58.75 59.18
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 99.7 278.9 492.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 276.3 492.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.19, N = 10 SE +/- 0.20, N = 9 25.41 25.75
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.3 290.5 492.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 284.2 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Timed LLVM Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.78, N = 3 SE +/- 0.79, N = 3 208.04 208.79
Timed LLVM Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.1 322.9 492.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 64.9 318.0 492.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Timed MrBayes Analysis Primate Phylogeny Analysis OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 82.26 82.04 1. (CC) gcc options: -mmmx -msse -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -msha -maes -mavx -mfma -mavx2 -mrdrnd -mbmi -mbmi2 -madx -mabm -O3 -std=c99 -pedantic -lm
Timed MrBayes Analysis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.2 465.5 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.9 467.9 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
TNN Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 2.83, N = 3 297.13 289.76 MIN: 295.49 / MAX: 320.4 MIN: 283.65 / MAX: 458.79 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -rdynamic -ldl
TNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.6 155.3 165.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 73.7 143.3 175.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
TNN Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 274.10 274.87 MIN: 273.16 / MAX: 274.86 MIN: 273.07 / MAX: 276.74 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -rdynamic -ldl
TNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 65.3 127.9 130.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 129.8 132.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
TSCP AI Chess Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 517.61, N = 12 SE +/- 609.97, N = 12 1116255 1114562 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
TSCP AI Chess Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 9016.56 8992.52
TSCP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 123.8 129.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 123.9 131.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TSCP 1.81 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
TTSIOD 3D Renderer Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 5.92, N = 15 SE +/- 3.22, N = 3 665.45 655.23 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -mtune=native -flto -msse -mrecip -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -mssse3 -lSDL -fopenmp -fwhole-program -lstdc++
TTSIOD 3D Renderer Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.6165 1.233 1.8495 2.466 3.0825 2.74 2.70
TTSIOD 3D Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.0 243.0 271.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 242.4 266.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Tungsten Renderer Scene: Hair OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Hair CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.06150, N = 6 SE +/- 0.01480, N = 6 6.69505 6.69036 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -march=znver1 -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lIlmImf -lIlmThread -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lz -ljpeg -lpthread -ldl
Tungsten Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.7 289.5 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 291.2 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Tungsten Renderer Scene: Water Caustic OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Water Caustic CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 15 21.47 21.33 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -march=znver1 -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lIlmImf -lIlmThread -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lz -ljpeg -lpthread -ldl
Tungsten Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.6 187.7 234.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 187.1 235.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Tungsten Renderer Scene: Volumetric Caustic OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Volumetric Caustic CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.1952 2.3904 3.5856 4.7808 5.976 SE +/- 0.03612, N = 13 SE +/- 0.03676, N = 7 5.31183 5.26235 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -march=znver1 -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lIlmImf -lIlmThread -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lz -ljpeg -lpthread -ldl
Tungsten Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.3 246.2 358.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 246.3 358.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.73, N = 15 SE +/- 0.52, N = 4 62.29 49.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0698 0.1396 0.2094 0.2792 0.349 0.31 0.29
x265 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.6 200.8 253.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.1 169.9 202.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better x265 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 20.75 19.74 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 0.08 0.08
x265 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.3 250.4 301.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 238.0 293.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better x265 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
YafaRay Total Time For Sample Scene OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better YafaRay 3.4.1 Total Time For Sample Scene CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.69, N = 15 SE +/- 0.85, N = 15 87.33 87.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -O3 -ffast-math -rdynamic -ldl -lImath -lIlmImf -lIex -lHalf -lz -lIlmThread -lxml2 -lfreetype -lpthread
YafaRay CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better YafaRay 3.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 120.76 / Avg: 313.28 / Max: 374.38 Min: 77.37 / Avg: 312.46 / Max: 377.49
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 648.67, N = 12 SE +/- 69.07, N = 3 7770.3 8270.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12 24 36 48 60 50.56 54.88
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.0 153.7 222.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 150.7 214.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4