BlogBench

BlogBench is designed to replicate the load of a real-world busy file server by stressing the file-system with multiple threads of random reads, writes, and rewrites. The behavior is mimicked of that of a blog by creating blogs with content and pictures, modifying blog posts, adding comments to these blogs, and then reading the content of the blogs. All of these blogs generated are created locally with fake content and pictures.

To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark blogbench.

Project Site

blogbench.pureftpd.org

Test Created

6 December 2010

Last Updated

4 December 2018

Test Maintainer

Michael Larabel

Test Type

Disk

Average Install Time

9 Seconds

Average Run Time

8 Minutes, 27 Seconds

Test Dependencies

C/C++ Compiler Toolchain

Accolades

200k+ Downloads

Supported Platforms

* Uploading of benchmark result data to OpenBenchmarking.org is always optional (opt-in) via the Phoronix Test Suite for users wishing to share their results publicly.
** Data based on those opting to upload their test results to OpenBenchmarking.org and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform.
*** Test profile page view reporting began March 2021.
Data updated weekly as of 18 February 2025.

Revision History

pts/blogbench-1.1.0 [View Source] Tue, 04 Dec 2018 12:48:39 GMT
Update against BlogBench 1.1 upstream, add check for handling AArch64.

pts/blogbench-1.0.1 [View Source] Thu, 08 Mar 2018 20:21:23 GMT
Windows support.

pts/blogbench-1.0.0 [View Source] Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:26:55 GMT
Initial import into OpenBenchmarking.org

Suites Using This Test

Server

CPU Massive

Performance Metrics

Analyze Test Configuration:

BlogBench 1.1

Test: Read

OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 1,281 public results since 4 December 2018 with the latest data as of 16 February 2025.

Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.

Component

Percentile Rank

# Compatible Public Results

Final Score (Average)

960GB INTEL SSDPED1D960GAY

100th

3825147 ^{+/- 48175}

2000GB CT2000P3SSD8

99th

3387756 ^{+/- 488568}

1000GB KINGSTON SFYRS1000G

97th

2755828

CT1000T700SSD5

93rd

2304579 ^{+/- 137905}

AirDisk 512GB SSD

92nd

2209220 ^{+/- 219109}

800GB INTEL

92nd

2201043 ^{+/- 208018}

512GB Toshiba THNSN5512GPUK

90th

2122597 ^{+/- 91653}

2 x 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB

89th

2040708 ^{+/- 102866}

12 x 215GB FlashArray

85th

1944221 ^{+/- 46162}

4 x 2048GB MR9460-16i

85th

1930331 ^{+/- 22560}

4 x 1000GB INTEL SSDPELKX010T8

83rd

1862651 ^{+/- 9819}

4 x 1024GB KXG60ZNV1T02 TOSHIBA

81st

1808502 ^{+/- 79234}

3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP

79th

1688781 ^{+/- 235499}

2396GB MR9271-8i

78th

1662855 ^{+/- 126879}

2396GB MR9266-8i

77th

1608728 ^{+/- 91685}

Mid-Tier

75th

< 1531496

2 x 32GB SATA SSD

74th

1498376 ^{+/- 21025}

1000GB Force MP600

71st

1396450 ^{+/- 121918}

128GB KINGSTON RBUSNS8

65th

1103552 ^{+/- 10173}

Force MP600

63rd

1084109 ^{+/- 5325}

1000GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 1TB

63rd

1074168 ^{+/- 46115}

2398GB HW-SAS3508

55th

906590 ^{+/- 131203}

20 x 500GB Samsung SSD 860

53rd

806679 ^{+/- 46787}

1024GB SAMSUNG MZMTE1T0

52nd

804647 ^{+/- 34240}

120GB SSDSCKJB120G7R

51st

782098 ^{+/- 6436}

Median

50th

756084

750GB TOSHIBA MQ01ABD0

49th

727405 ^{+/- 11659}

32GB TS32GMSA510

36th

438061 ^{+/- 14193}

512GB INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8

32nd

382654 ^{+/- 8887}

146GB SRCSASRB

28th

336923 ^{+/- 6901}

250GB Tech

26th

285847 ^{+/- 7407}

Low-Tier

25th

< 269694

20 x ATA Samsung SSD 860 1B6Q

21st

160992 ^{+/- 2780}

64GB SN64G

16th

41443 ^{+/- 4505}

2 x 1788GB Micron_7450_MTFDKCC1T9TFR

14th

31748 ^{+/- 2606}

238GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G8

8th

8072 ^{+/- 484}

238GB NVMe INTEL SSDPEKKW25

7th

7509 ^{+/- 378}

2 x 932GB WDC WD10EZEX-00BN5A0

6th

7021 ^{+/- 301}

Detailed Performance Overview

Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (BlogBench 1.1 - Test: Read) has an average run-time of 32 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 3 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.

Based on public OpenBenchmarking.org results, the selected test / test configuration has an average standard deviation of 3.9%.

Notable Instruction Set Usage

Notable instruction set extensions supported by this test, based on an automatic analysis by the Phoronix Test Suite / OpenBenchmarking.org analytics engine.

Instruction Set

Support

Instructions Detected

The test / benchmark does honor compiler flag changes.

Last automated analysis: 17 January 2022

This test profile binary relies on the shared libraries libc.so.6.

Tested CPU Architectures

This benchmark has been successfully tested on the below mentioned architectures. The CPU architectures listed is where successful OpenBenchmarking.org result uploads occurred, namely for helping to determine if a given test is compatible with various alternative CPU architectures.

CPU Architecture

Kernel Identifier

Verified On

Intel / AMD x86 64-bit

x86_64

(Many Processors)

MIPS 64-bit

mips64

Loongson-3A R4

Intel / AMD x86 32-bit

i686

(Many Processors)

ARMv7 32-bit

armv7l

ARMv7 Cortex-A9 2-Core

ARMv8 64-bit

aarch64

ARMv8, ARMv8 Cortex-A72, ARMv8 Cortex-A72 4-Core, ARMv8 Cortex-A72 6-Core, ARMv8 Cortex-A73, ARMv8 Cortex-A76 4-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-N1, ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 4-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-N1 64-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-N2, ARMv8 Neoverse-V1, ARMv8 Neoverse-V1 4-Core, ARMv8 Neoverse-V2, Ampere eMAG ARMv8 32-Core, Ampere eMAG ARMv8 4-Core, HUAWEI Kunpeng 920, HUAWEI Kunpeng 920 5221K, Phytium D2000, Phytium FT-2000, Phytium FT2000A 4-Core, Phytium S2500

TEST_BLOGBENCH 2 Systems - 2 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i5-1235U - LENOVO LNVNB161216 - Intel Alder Lake PCH Debian 12 - 6.1.0-28-amd64 - GNOME Shell 43.9
Merged Results for avx7900x 1 System - 685 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 12-Core - ASUS PRIME X670-P WIFI - AMD Device 14d8 Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.8.0-52-lowlatency - KDE Plasma 5.27.11
Merged Results for Multiple Systems 5 Systems - 863 Benchmark Results
blogbench-results 1 System - 2 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i5-11400H - HP 88F9 v88.58 - Intel Tiger Lake-H Fedora Linux 41 - 6.12.5-200.fc41.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 47.2
Blogbench test 1 System - 2 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i7-6820HQ - Dell 0N8J4R - Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5 Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.8.0-52-generic - GNOME Shell 46.0
BlogBench 1 System - 2 Benchmark Results	AMD A12-9720P RADEON R7 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G - LENOVO LNVNB161216 - AMD 15h Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.8.0-52-generic - GNOME Shell 42.9
bench_prueba 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G - HP 84AC v85.30 - AMD 15h Fedora 38 - 6.8.9-100.fc38.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 44.10
2025-02-11-1137 1 System - 164 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 12-Core - ASUS PRIME X670-P WIFI - AMD Device 14d8 Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.8.0-52-lowlatency - KDE Plasma 5.27.11
ntx-r640-win 2 Systems - 10 Benchmark Results	4 x Intel Xeon (Skylake IBRS no TSX) - Carte-mre - 1 x 8192MB 0MHz Red Hat Microsoft Windows Server 2019 Standard Build 17763 - 10.0.17763.6532 - 10.0.17763.1
bench_prueba 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G - HP 84AC v85.30 - AMD 15h Fedora 38 - 6.8.9-100.fc38.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 44.10
bench_prueba 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G - HP 84AC v85.30 - AMD 15h Fedora 38 - 6.8.9-100.fc38.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 44.10
redis_others_result 1 System - 19 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 5 3500U - DL Aspire A315-23 Lotus_DA - AMD Raven Linuxmint 21.2 - 5.15.0-131-generic - Cinnamon 5.8.4
bench_prueba 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G - HP 84AC v85.30 - AMD 15h Fedora 38 - 6.8.9-100.fc38.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 44.10
multimass1 1 System - 44 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 12-Core - ASUS PRIME X670-P WIFI - AMD Device 14d8 Ubuntu 24.04 - 6.8.0-52-lowlatency - KDE Plasma
prueba6 1 System - 2 Benchmark Results	AMD A9-9425 RADEON R5 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G - HP 8430 v1000 - AMD 15h Fedora Linux 40 - 6.12.11-100.fc40.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 46.7

FreeBSD 12.2 vs. FreeBSD 13 BETA Benchmarks 4 Systems - 131 Benchmark Results	Intel Xeon E-2278GEL - Logic Supply RXM-181 TBD by OEM - Intel FreeBSD - 12.2-RELEASE - Clang 10.0.1
BSD vs. Linux Workstation 29 EPYC AMD Benchmarks 8 Systems - 62 Benchmark Results	AMD EPYC 7351P 16-Core - AMD [AMD] Family 17h - 32768MB DragonFly - 5.4-RELEASE - GCC 8.1
AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 3 Systems - 376 Benchmark Results	2 x AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core - Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 - AMD Starship Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.10.9-051009-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.1
Core i9 7960X Linux 5.0 Kernel Benchmarks Featured Kernel Comparison	Intel Core i9-7960X - MSI X299 SLI PLUS - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers Ubuntu 18.10 - 4.12.0-041200-generic - GNOME Shell 3.30.1
Ubuntu, Clear Linux 2019 vs. 2021 - Intel Xeon Cascade Lake 4 Systems - 23 Benchmark Results	2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 - GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers Clear Linux OS 34420 - 5.10.19-1032.native - GNOME Shell 3.38.4
Intel Xeon Haswell Mitigation Costs Linux Featured Processor Comparison	Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 - ASUS X99-A - Intel Xeon E7 v3 Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.18.0-20-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.3
AMD EPYC 7702 Linux 5.11 Featured Kernel Comparison	AMD EPYC 7702 64-Core - ASRockRack EPYCD8 - AMD Starship Ubuntu 20.10 - 5.10.2-051002-generic - GNOME Shell 3.38.1
Big Threadripper 2 Systems - 475 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core - ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME - AMD Starship Ubuntu 19.10 - 5.3.0-40-generic - GNOME Shell 3.34.1
Linux 5.0 To Linux 5.9 On AMD EPYC 10 Systems - 136 Benchmark Results	AMD EPYC 7702 64-Core - ASRockRack EPYCD8 - AMD Starship Ubuntu 20.04 - 5.0.0-050000-generic - GNOME Shell 3.36.4
Windows Server 2019 vs. Linux vs. FreeBSD On Intel Xeon Server Benchmarks 12 Systems - 123 Benchmark Results	2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6138 - TYAN S7106 - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers CentOS Linux 7 - 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 3.28.3
OnLogic Karbon 700 Linux Benchmarks 5 Systems - 141 Benchmark Results	Intel Xeon E-2278GEL - Logic Supply RXM-181 - Intel Cannon Lake PCH Debian 10 - 4.19.0-6-amd64 - GNOME Shell 3.30.2
openSUSE 15.1 AMD EPYC Performance 8 Systems - 77 Benchmark Results	2 x AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core - Dell 02MJ3T - AMD 17h Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6 - 3.10.0-957.12.1.el7.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 3.28.3
Intel Xeon Haswell Mitigation Costs Linux 4 Systems - 83 Benchmark Results	Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 - ASUS X99-A - Intel Xeon E7 v3 Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.18.0-20-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.3
vet test 3 Systems - 54 Benchmark Results	Apple M1 - Apple Mac mini - 8GB macOS 11.0.1 - 20.1.0 - OpenCL 1.2
Server Mitigation Costs AMD Intel 8 Systems - 76 Benchmark Results	2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6138 - TYAN S7106 - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers Ubuntu 19.04 - 5.0.0-15-generic - GNOME Shell 3.32.0

BlogBench

Project Site

Test Created

Last Updated

Test Maintainer

Test Type

Average Install Time

Average Run Time

Test Dependencies

Accolades

Supported Platforms

Revision History

Suites Using This Test

Performance Metrics

BlogBench 1.1

Test: Read

Notable Instruction Set Usage

Tested CPU Architectures

Recent Test Results

Most Popular Test Results