AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 - Perf Governor 2 x AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core testing looking at CPU freq invariance on 5.11 with patch. CPU power consumption monitoring via AMD_Energy interface at 1 second polling. Additional data with CPUFreq performance governor included.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2101273-SYST-210125309&sro&grs .
AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 - Perf Governor Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver Compiler File-System Screen Resolution CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2 x AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core @ 3.20GHz (48 Cores / 96 Threads) Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS) AMD Starship/Matisse 16 x 8192 MB DDR4-3200MT/s HMA81GR7CJR8N-XN 1000GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 1TB ASPEED VE228 2 x Intel 10G X550T Ubuntu 20.10 5.11.0-rc4-max-boost-inv-patch (x86_64) 20210121 GNOME Shell 3.38.1 X Server 1.20.9 modesetting 1.20.9 GCC 10.2.0 ext4 1920x1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-10-JvwpWM/gcc-10-10.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-10-JvwpWM/gcc-10-10.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v Disk Details - NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096 Processor Details - CPUFreq Schedutil: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x8301034 - CPUFreq Performance: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x8301034 Java Details - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.10) Python Details - Python 3.8.6 Security Details - itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 - Perf Governor cpuminer-opt: LBC, LBRY Credits dav1d: Chimera 1080p 10-bit ospray: Magnetic Reconnection - Path Tracer x265: Bosphorus 1080p dacapobench: Tradebeans influxdb: 4 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 dav1d: Summer Nature 4K dacapobench: Tradesoap build-gdb: Time To Compile ior: 2MB - Default Test Directory influxdb: 64 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 qe: AUSURF112 ai-benchmark: Device Training Score svt-vp9: VMAF Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p x265: Bosphorus 4K onednn: IP Shapes 3D - f32 - CPU ai-benchmark: Device AI Score rav1e: 10 askap: tConvolve MPI - Degridding himeno: Poisson Pressure Solver ior: 8MB - Default Test Directory lammps: Rhodopsin Protein john-the-ripper: MD5 ai-benchmark: Device Inference Score simdjson: LargeRand redis: LPUSH rodinia: OpenMP Leukocyte rav1e: 6 tnn: CPU - MobileNet v2 rav1e: 5 compress-lz4: 3 - Decompression Speed svt-vp9: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p lulesh: onnx: yolov4 - OpenMP CPU svt-av1: Enc Mode 4 - 1080p lczero: BLAS redis: SET fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 4096 onednn: IP Shapes 1D - f32 - CPU ttsiod-renderer: Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping blogbench: Read onednn: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - f32 - CPU compress-lz4: 1 - Decompression Speed tensorflow-lite: SqueezeNet financebench: Repo OpenMP build-linux-kernel: Time To Compile john-the-ripper: Blowfish onednn: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - f32 - CPU financebench: Bonds OpenMP tensorflow-lite: Mobilenet Float luxcorerender: DLSC cython-bench: N-Queens compress-lz4: 1 - Compression Speed povray: Trace Time ospray: San Miguel - SciVis qmcpack: simple-H2O primesieve: 1e12 Prime Number Generation tensorflow-lite: Inception V4 stockfish: Total Time tungsten: Volumetric Caustic sqlite-speedtest: Timed Time - Size 1,000 rodinia: OpenMP Streamcluster byte: Dhrystone 2 clomp: Static OMP Speedup rav1e: 1 dacapobench: Jython tachyon: Total Time plaidml: No - Inference - VGG16 - CPU blender: Barbershop - CPU-Only build-godot: Time To Compile ffte: N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine compress-lz4: 3 - Compression Speed plaidml: No - Inference - ResNet 50 - CPU compress-lz4: 9 - Decompression Speed tungsten: Water Caustic ospray: Magnetic Reconnection - SciVis compress-lz4: 9 - Compression Speed rodinia: OpenMP LavaMD onnx: super-resolution-10 - OpenMP CPU numpy: onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - f32 - CPU openfoam: Motorbike 60M npb: EP.C npb: LU.C lczero: Eigen build-llvm: Time To Compile tensorflow-lite: Mobilenet Quant astcenc: Thorough svt-av1: Enc Mode 8 - 1080p hpcg: amg: rodinia: OpenMP HotSpot3D tnn: CPU - SqueezeNet v1.1 cpuminer-opt: x25x plaidml: No - Inference - VGG19 - CPU mrbayes: Primate Phylogeny Analysis astcenc: Exhaustive tensorflow-lite: Inception ResNet V2 ospray: San Miguel - Path Tracer asmfish: 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth yafaray: Total Time For Sample Scene oidn: Memorial gnupg: 2.7GB Sample File Encryption swet: Average etcpak: ETC1 gpaw: Carbon Nanotube lammps: 20k Atoms askap: tConvolve MPI - Gridding tscp: AI Chess Performance cpuminer-opt: Garlicoin brl-cad: VGR Performance Metric hint: FLOAT gromacs: Water Benchmark synthmark: VoiceMark_100 npb: EP.D gcrypt: dolfyn: Computational Fluid Dynamics tungsten: Hair etcpak: ETC1 + Dithering openfoam: Motorbike 30M redis: SADD quantlib: build2: Time To Compile relion: Basic - CPU etcpak: ETC2 namd: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms svt-av1: Enc Mode 0 - 1080p simdjson: DistinctUserID simdjson: Kostya simdjson: PartialTweets luxcorerender: Rainbow Colors and Prism ospray: NASA Streamlines - Path Tracer ospray: NASA Streamlines - SciVis ospray: XFrog Forest - Path Tracer ospray: XFrog Forest - SciVis v-ray: CPU tensorflow-lite: NASNet Mobile svt-vp9: Visual Quality Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p rodinia: OpenMP CFD Solver neat: onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - f32 - CPU keydb: dacapobench: H2 compress-zstd: 3 redis: GET cpuminer-opt: Skeincoin cpuminer-opt: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 139037 133.37 250 49.45 5591 812193.6 317.45 5148 92.916 475.25 1256112.1 1171.03 1067 364.81 19.74 0.849248 2787 3.054 11944.2 4286.628309 520.72 23.787 4612308 1720 0.36 1217218.75 52.684 1.408 289.764 1.068 10666.0 371.48 19771.223 181 7.648 4061 1427348.10 17015 1.55447 655.225 1103118 0.521968 11305.0 62195.4 39406.757812 25.752 72636 2.33290 56769.453125 39523.5 7.80 26.604 9757.17 11.305 54.97 29.281 4.535 810750 97042601 5.26235 70.540 10.338 38319339.8 47.8 0.372 4778 18.0565 25.42 156.83 59.177 178738.12497094 48.95 4.63 10489.8 21.3329 32.62 47.76 52.092 4210 323.00 0.863782 128.28 3841.48 154376.76 4433 208.786 41034.0 5.65 68.231 30.8262 1448718333 96.603 274.869 1541.76 22.49 82.042 40.97 736285 4.32 117632955 87.143 28.39 77.179 687480262 267.587 59.851 25.077 7453.51 1114562 9949.88 636521 323144417.17197 5.261 714.914 3863.45 232.542 18.652 6.69036 245.595 18.30 1611164.34 2157.2 67.322 348.294 155.798 0.44472 0.091 0.65 0.57 0.63 8.76 16.39 71.43 5.95 11.19 53460 134044 323.81 8.882 24.633 1123.32 294214.37 5217 8270.5 1711621.52 364017 296995 194087 181.95 333.33 62.29 4671 956189.4 363.33 4621 85.277 517.33 1360163.0 1249.06 1133 346.71 20.75 0.813628 2908 3.177 11492.9 4135.519154 539.63 24.639 4762000 1775 0.37 1251006.00 51.290 1.446 297.132 1.095 10410.3 363.18 19334.862 185 7.488 4147 1454741.42 17335 1.57963 665.448 1086347 0.514604 11150.6 61347.2 39948.356771 25.414 71757 2.30467 56094.488281 39981.9 7.89 26.895 9651.61 11.427 55.56 28.971 4.489 818887 96082114 5.31183 69.883 10.432 38656226.3 47.4 0.375 4740 18.2004 25.22 158.07 58.746 180037.95358586 49.29 4.66 10555.1 21.4652 32.80 48.02 52.360 4190 324.48 0.867545 128.81 3857.33 153770.57 4450 208.043 41180.1 5.67 68.465 30.9260 1444174667 96.885 274.097 1537.52 22.43 82.261 41.07 737993 4.33 117370871 87.331 28.33 77.022 686132109 267.136 59.757 25.116 7441.95 1116255 9964.35 635725 322775283.80125 5.255 714.181 3867.30 232.760 18.635 6.69505 245.453 18.29 1610484.50 2156.3 67.334 348.338 155.783 0.44469 0.091 0.65 0.57 0.63 8.76 16.39 71.43 5.95 11.19 55014 132844 309.61 8.510 25.037 1247.48 303171.33 4570 7770.3 1782755.97 522948 420231 OpenBenchmarking.org
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 861.90, N = 3 SE +/- 1380.06, N = 3 194087 139037 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 181.95 133.37 MIN: 125.32 / MAX: 275.36 MIN: 92.59 / MAX: 205.11 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.00, N = 11 333.33 250.00 MIN: 100 / MAX: 500 MIN: 90.91 / MAX: 333.33
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.73, N = 15 SE +/- 0.52, N = 4 62.29 49.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradebeans OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 52.34, N = 20 SE +/- 66.39, N = 20 4671 5591
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 2401.68, N = 3 SE +/- 1525.09, N = 3 956189.4 812193.6
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 3.54, N = 15 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 363.33 317.45 MIN: 186.32 / MAX: 403.05 MIN: 173.69 / MAX: 340.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradesoap OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 42.72, N = 5 SE +/- 61.21, N = 4 4621 5148
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 Time To Compile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 85.28 92.92
IOR Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 5.48, N = 3 SE +/- 2.06, N = 3 517.33 475.25 MIN: 463.44 / MAX: 1007.52 MIN: 400.96 / MAX: 971.55 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -pthread -lmpi
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 9433.94, N = 3 SE +/- 2545.78, N = 3 1360163.0 1256112.1
Quantum ESPRESSO Input: AUSURF112 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 Input: AUSURF112 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 19.05, N = 9 SE +/- 12.21, N = 4 1249.06 1171.03 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -lopenblas -lFoX_dom -lFoX_sax -lFoX_wxml -lFoX_common -lFoX_utils -lFoX_fsys -lfftw3 -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz
AI Benchmark Alpha Device Training Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Training Score CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 200 400 600 800 1000 1133 1067
SVT-VP9 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 2.58, N = 15 SE +/- 0.91, N = 10 346.71 364.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 20.75 19.74 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1911 0.3822 0.5733 0.7644 0.9555 SE +/- 0.005456, N = 5 SE +/- 0.004000, N = 5 0.813628 0.849248 MIN: 0.69 MIN: 0.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
AI Benchmark Alpha Device AI Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device AI Score CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 2908 2787
rav1e Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.7148 1.4296 2.1444 2.8592 3.574 SE +/- 0.018, N = 3 SE +/- 0.008, N = 3 3.177 3.054
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second, More Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 137.09, N = 3 SE +/- 6.47, N = 3 11492.9 11944.2 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 27.09, N = 3 SE +/- 25.26, N = 3 4135.52 4286.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -mavx2
IOR Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 5.78, N = 3 SE +/- 2.63, N = 3 539.63 520.72 MIN: 280.44 / MAX: 1002.78 MIN: 176.53 / MAX: 1089.46 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -pthread -lmpi
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: Rhodopsin Protein OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.19, N = 15 SE +/- 0.17, N = 12 24.64 23.79 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lm
John The Ripper Test: MD5 OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1000K 2000K 3000K 4000K 5000K SE +/- 7371.11, N = 3 SE +/- 54344.04, N = 13 4762000 4612308 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -pthread -lm -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2
AI Benchmark Alpha Device Inference Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Inference Score CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1775 1720
simdjson Throughput Test: LargeRandom OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: LargeRandom CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0833 0.1666 0.2499 0.3332 0.4165 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.37 0.36 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
Redis Test: LPUSH OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 11397.44, N = 3 SE +/- 13782.67, N = 3 1251006.00 1217218.75 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
Rodinia Test: OpenMP Leukocyte OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.69, N = 3 51.29 52.68 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
rav1e Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.3254 0.6508 0.9762 1.3016 1.627 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 1.446 1.408
TNN Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 2.83, N = 3 297.13 289.76 MIN: 295.49 / MAX: 320.4 MIN: 283.65 / MAX: 458.79 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -rdynamic -ldl
rav1e Speed: 5 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.2464 0.4928 0.7392 0.9856 1.232 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 1.095 1.068
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 61.51, N = 5 SE +/- 60.61, N = 3 10410.3 10666.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
SVT-VP9 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.84, N = 9 SE +/- 1.70, N = 9 363.18 371.48 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
LULESH OpenBenchmarking.org z/s, More Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 182.76, N = 5 SE +/- 171.84, N = 5 19334.86 19771.22 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp -lm -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
ONNX Runtime Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.62, N = 3 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 185 181 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -ldl -lrt
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.031, N = 4 SE +/- 0.029, N = 4 7.488 7.648 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
LeelaChessZero Backend: BLAS OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: BLAS CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 17.79, N = 3 SE +/- 49.90, N = 9 4147 4061 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -pthread
Redis Test: SET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 10017.79, N = 13 SE +/- 13176.39, N = 15 1454741.42 1427348.10 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 199.64, N = 9 SE +/- 213.45, N = 3 17335 17015 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.3554 0.7108 1.0662 1.4216 1.777 SE +/- 0.01359, N = 4 SE +/- 0.01340, N = 4 1.57963 1.55447 MIN: 1.31 MIN: 1.29 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
TTSIOD 3D Renderer Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 5.92, N = 15 SE +/- 3.22, N = 3 665.45 655.23 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -mtune=native -flto -msse -mrecip -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -mssse3 -lSDL -fopenmp -fwhole-program -lstdc++
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 13508.02, N = 3 SE +/- 1738.41, N = 3 1086347 1103118 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
oneDNN Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1174 0.2348 0.3522 0.4696 0.587 SE +/- 0.005906, N = 4 SE +/- 0.004601, N = 4 0.514604 0.521968 MIN: 0.43 MIN: 0.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 110.98, N = 3 SE +/- 25.21, N = 3 11150.6 11305.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
TensorFlow Lite Model: SqueezeNet OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: SqueezeNet CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 715.70, N = 4 SE +/- 412.91, N = 15 61347.2 62195.4
FinanceBench Benchmark: Repo OpenMP OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 456.10, N = 3 SE +/- 393.10, N = 3 39948.36 39406.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.19, N = 10 SE +/- 0.20, N = 9 25.41 25.75
John The Ripper Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K SE +/- 507.10, N = 3 SE +/- 73.45, N = 3 71757 72636 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -pthread -lm -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2
oneDNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.5249 1.0498 1.5747 2.0996 2.6245 SE +/- 0.02560, N = 15 SE +/- 0.01587, N = 3 2.30467 2.33290 MIN: 1.88 MIN: 2 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
FinanceBench Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 365.12, N = 3 SE +/- 598.50, N = 3 56094.49 56769.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
TensorFlow Lite Model: Mobilenet Float OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Float CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 473.02, N = 3 SE +/- 395.37, N = 3 39981.9 39523.5
LuxCoreRender Scene: DLSC OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 7.89 7.80 MIN: 7.67 / MAX: 8.57 MIN: 7.61 / MAX: 8.59
Cython Benchmark Test: N-Queens OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 26.90 26.60
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 71.91, N = 3 SE +/- 19.43, N = 3 9651.61 9757.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
POV-Ray Trace Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 SE +/- 0.05, N = 4 11.43 11.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -pthread -lSDL -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lIlmImf -lIlmImf-2_5 -lImath-2_5 -lHalf-2_5 -lIex-2_5 -lIexMath-2_5 -lIlmThread-2_5 -lIlmThread -ltiff -ljpeg -lpng -lz -lrt -lm -lboost_thread -lboost_system
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 5 55.56 54.97 MIN: 33.33 / MAX: 58.82 MIN: 31.25 / MAX: 58.82
QMCPACK Input: simple-H2O OpenBenchmarking.org Total Execution Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 28.97 29.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -finline-limit=1000 -fstrict-aliasing -funroll-all-loops -march=native -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -pthread -lm
Primesieve 1e12 Prime Number Generation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 7.4 1e12 Prime Number Generation CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.0204 2.0408 3.0612 4.0816 5.102 SE +/- 0.008, N = 8 SE +/- 0.015, N = 8 4.489 4.535 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lpthread
TensorFlow Lite Model: Inception V4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception V4 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 4685.69, N = 3 SE +/- 1163.43, N = 3 818887 810750
Stockfish Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Stockfish 12 Total Time CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M SE +/- 1344259.09, N = 3 SE +/- 769788.53, N = 3 96082114 97042601 1. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++17 -pedantic -O3 -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -msse4.1 -mssse3 -msse2 -flto -flto=jobserver
Tungsten Renderer Scene: Volumetric Caustic OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Volumetric Caustic CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.1952 2.3904 3.5856 4.7808 5.976 SE +/- 0.03612, N = 13 SE +/- 0.03676, N = 7 5.31183 5.26235 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -march=znver1 -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lIlmImf -lIlmThread -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lz -ljpeg -lpthread -ldl
SQLite Speedtest Timed Time - Size 1,000 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 69.88 70.54 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lz -lpthread
Rodinia Test: OpenMP Streamcluster OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 5 SE +/- 0.03, N = 5 10.43 10.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
BYTE Unix Benchmark Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 OpenBenchmarking.org LPS, More Is Better BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 8M 16M 24M 32M 40M SE +/- 498492.56, N = 3 SE +/- 341040.65, N = 3 38656226.3 38319339.8
CLOMP Static OMP Speedup OpenBenchmarking.org Speedup, More Is Better CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 47.4 47.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -lm
rav1e Speed: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0844 0.1688 0.2532 0.3376 0.422 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.375 0.372
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Jython OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 20.83, N = 6 SE +/- 43.93, N = 6 4740 4778
Tachyon Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 18.20 18.06 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -ltachyon -lm -lpthread
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.24, N = 15 SE +/- 0.30, N = 15 25.22 25.42
Blender Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.90 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.95, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 158.07 156.83
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 58.75 59.18
FFTE N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 1616.93, N = 15 SE +/- 1760.31, N = 15 180037.95 178738.12 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fopenmp
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.52, N = 5 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 49.29 48.95 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.0485 2.097 3.1455 4.194 5.2425 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 4.66 4.63
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 96.09, N = 3 SE +/- 31.24, N = 3 10555.1 10489.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Tungsten Renderer Scene: Water Caustic OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Water Caustic CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 15 21.47 21.33 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -march=znver1 -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lIlmImf -lIlmThread -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lz -ljpeg -lpthread -ldl
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.24, N = 6 SE +/- 0.23, N = 6 32.80 32.62 MIN: 13.16 / MAX: 34.48 MIN: 12.82 / MAX: 33.33
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 48.02 47.76 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Rodinia Test: OpenMP LavaMD OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 52.36 52.09 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
ONNX Runtime Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 68.07, N = 12 SE +/- 44.10, N = 3 4190 4210 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -ldl -lrt
Numpy Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 324.48 323.00
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1952 0.3904 0.5856 0.7808 0.976 SE +/- 0.001697, N = 7 SE +/- 0.001510, N = 7 0.867545 0.863782 MIN: 0.78 MIN: 0.79 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
OpenFOAM Input: Motorbike 60M OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 60M CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 128.81 128.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -m64 -O3 -ftemplate-depth-100 -fPIC -fuse-ld=bfd -Xlinker --add-needed --no-as-needed -lfoamToVTK -ldynamicMesh -llagrangian -lgenericPatchFields -lfileFormats -lOpenFOAM -ldl -lm
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 4.01, N = 10 SE +/- 5.01, N = 10 3857.33 3841.48 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz 2. Open MPI 4.0.3
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: LU.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 121.33, N = 4 SE +/- 509.59, N = 4 153770.57 154376.76 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz 2. Open MPI 4.0.3
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: Eigen CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 26.71, N = 3 SE +/- 36.23, N = 3 4450 4433 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -pthread
Timed LLVM Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.78, N = 3 SE +/- 0.79, N = 3 208.04 208.79
TensorFlow Lite Model: Mobilenet Quant OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Quant CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 211.03, N = 3 SE +/- 400.94, N = 6 41180.1 41034.0
ASTC Encoder Preset: Thorough OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Thorough CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.2758 2.5516 3.8274 5.1032 6.379 SE +/- 0.01, N = 5 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 5.67 5.65 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++14 -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -flto -mfpmath=sse -mavx2 -mpopcnt -lpthread
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.65, N = 15 SE +/- 1.05, N = 15 68.47 68.23 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
High Performance Conjugate Gradient OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 30.93 30.83 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300M 600M 900M 1200M 1500M SE +/- 4018322.42, N = 3 SE +/- 750486.58, N = 3 1444174667 1448718333 1. (CC) gcc options: -lparcsr_ls -lparcsr_mv -lseq_mv -lIJ_mv -lkrylov -lHYPRE_utilities -lm -fopenmp -pthread -lmpi
Rodinia Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 SE +/- 0.59, N = 3 96.89 96.60 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
TNN Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 274.10 274.87 MIN: 273.16 / MAX: 274.86 MIN: 273.07 / MAX: 276.74 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -rdynamic -ldl
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: x25x OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 11.04, N = 12 SE +/- 17.73, N = 15 1537.52 1541.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.20, N = 15 SE +/- 0.16, N = 15 22.43 22.49
Timed MrBayes Analysis Primate Phylogeny Analysis OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 82.26 82.04 1. (CC) gcc options: -mmmx -msse -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -msha -maes -mavx -mfma -mavx2 -mrdrnd -mbmi -mbmi2 -madx -mabm -O3 -std=c99 -pedantic -lm
ASTC Encoder Preset: Exhaustive OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Exhaustive CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 41.07 40.97 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++14 -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -flto -mfpmath=sse -mavx2 -mpopcnt -lpthread
TensorFlow Lite Model: Inception ResNet V2 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception ResNet V2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 2132.19, N = 3 SE +/- 5824.36, N = 9 737993 736285
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.9743 1.9486 2.9229 3.8972 4.8715 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 4.33 4.32 MIN: 3.65 / MAX: 4.37 MIN: 3.76 / MAX: 4.37
asmFish 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes/second, More Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30M 60M 90M 120M 150M SE +/- 1411556.16, N = 4 SE +/- 358515.89, N = 3 117370871 117632955
YafaRay Total Time For Sample Scene OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better YafaRay 3.4.1 Total Time For Sample Scene CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.69, N = 15 SE +/- 0.85, N = 15 87.33 87.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -O3 -ffast-math -rdynamic -ldl -lImath -lIlmImf -lIex -lHalf -lz -lIlmThread -lxml2 -lfreetype -lpthread
Intel Open Image Denoise Scene: Memorial OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.17, N = 6 SE +/- 0.04, N = 6 28.33 28.39
GnuPG 2.7GB Sample File Encryption OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 77.02 77.18 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2
Swet Average OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Swet 1.5.16 Average CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 150M 300M 450M 600M 750M SE +/- 3454923.88, N = 3 SE +/- 1732499.41, N = 3 686132109 687480262 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -lcurses -lrt
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 267.14 267.59 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
GPAW Input: Carbon Nanotube OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GPAW 20.1 Input: Carbon Nanotube CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 59.76 59.85 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -shared -fwrapv -O2 -lxc -lblas -lmpi
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: 20k Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 25.12 25.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lm
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second, More Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 7.65, N = 3 SE +/- 2.90, N = 3 7441.95 7453.51 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread
TSCP AI Chess Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 517.61, N = 12 SE +/- 609.97, N = 12 1116255 1114562 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Garlicoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 155.17, N = 14 SE +/- 99.38, N = 15 9964.35 9949.88 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
BRL-CAD VGR Performance Metric OpenBenchmarking.org VGR Performance Metric, More Is Better BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K 635725 636521 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fexceptions -ftemplate-depth-128 -m64 -ggdb3 -O3 -fipa-pta -fstrength-reduce -finline-functions -flto -pedantic -rdynamic -lSM -lICE -lXi -lGLU -lGL -lGLdispatch -lX11 -lXext -lXrender -lpthread -ldl -luuid -lm
Hierarchical INTegration Test: FLOAT OpenBenchmarking.org QUIPs, More Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70M 140M 210M 280M 350M SE +/- 201175.83, N = 3 SE +/- 122621.60, N = 3 322775283.80 323144417.17 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lm
GROMACS Water Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day, More Is Better GROMACS 2020.3 Water Benchmark CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.1837 2.3674 3.5511 4.7348 5.9185 SE +/- 0.021, N = 3 SE +/- 0.022, N = 3 5.255 5.261 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lrt -lpthread -lm
Google SynthMark Test: VoiceMark_100 OpenBenchmarking.org Voices, More Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 1.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 714.18 714.91 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -std=c++11 -Ofast
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.D OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 2.74, N = 3 SE +/- 2.97, N = 3 3867.30 3863.45 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz 2. Open MPI 4.0.3
Gcrypt Library OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Gcrypt Library 1.9 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 SE +/- 0.81, N = 3 232.76 232.54 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -fvisibility=hidden -lgpg-error
Dolfyn Computational Fluid Dynamics OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.64 18.65
Tungsten Renderer Scene: Hair OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Hair CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.06150, N = 6 SE +/- 0.01480, N = 6 6.69505 6.69036 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -march=znver1 -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lIlmImf -lIlmThread -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lz -ljpeg -lpthread -ldl
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 245.45 245.60 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
OpenFOAM Input: Motorbike 30M OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 18.29 18.30 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -m64 -O3 -ftemplate-depth-100 -fPIC -fuse-ld=bfd -Xlinker --add-needed --no-as-needed -lfoamToVTK -ldynamicMesh -llagrangian -lgenericPatchFields -lfileFormats -lOpenFOAM -ldl -lm
Redis Test: SADD OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 17675.25, N = 15 SE +/- 15585.71, N = 4 1610484.50 1611164.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
QuantLib OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 16.02, N = 3 SE +/- 8.27, N = 3 2156.3 2157.2 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic
Build2 Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.13 Time To Compile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 67.33 67.32
RELION Test: Basic - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 Test: Basic - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 3.10, N = 9 SE +/- 2.97, N = 9 348.34 348.29 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -std=c++0x -O3 -rdynamic -ldl -ltiff -lfftw3f -lfftw3 -lpng -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
Etcpak Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 155.78 155.80 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
NAMD ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1001 0.2002 0.3003 0.4004 0.5005 SE +/- 0.00075, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00005, N = 3 0.44469 0.44472
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0205 0.041 0.0615 0.082 0.1025 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 12 0.091 0.091 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
simdjson Throughput Test: DistinctUserID OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1463 0.2926 0.4389 0.5852 0.7315 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.65 0.65 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
simdjson Throughput Test: Kostya OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: Kostya CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1283 0.2566 0.3849 0.5132 0.6415 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.57 0.57 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
simdjson Throughput Test: PartialTweets OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: PartialTweets CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1418 0.2836 0.4254 0.5672 0.709 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.63 0.63 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
LuxCoreRender Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 8.76 8.76 MIN: 8.22 / MAX: 8.86 MIN: 8.31 / MAX: 8.97
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 16.39 16.39 MIN: 10.31 / MAX: 16.95 MIN: 10.99 / MAX: 16.95
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.00, N = 7 SE +/- 0.00, N = 7 71.43 71.43 MIN: 19.61 / MAX: 76.92 MIN: 19.61 / MAX: 76.92
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.3388 2.6776 4.0164 5.3552 6.694 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 5.95 5.95 MIN: 5.46 / MAX: 6.02 MIN: 5.35 / MAX: 6.02
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 11.19 11.19 MIN: 7.87 / MAX: 11.36 MIN: 8.2 / MAX: 11.36
CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 59.74 / Avg: 285.23 / Max: 514.05 Min: 59.88 / Avg: 280.92 / Max: 530.69
x265 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.3 250.4 301.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 238.0 293.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better x265 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 0.08 0.08
x265 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.6 200.8 253.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.1 169.9 202.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better x265 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0698 0.1396 0.2094 0.2792 0.349 0.31 0.29
Chaos Group V-RAY CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 421.1 492.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 419.0 492.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Ksamples Per Watt, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 130.65 127.59
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Ksamples, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 503.58, N = 3 SE +/- 1018.74, N = 13 55014 53460
Tungsten Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.3 246.2 358.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 246.3 358.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Tungsten Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.6 187.7 234.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 187.1 235.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Tungsten Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.7 289.5 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 291.2 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
TSCP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 123.8 129.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 123.9 131.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TSCP 1.81 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
TSCP AI Chess Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 9016.56 8992.52
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.7 429.0 458.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 431.6 460.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.8 439.4 470.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 442.7 471.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.9 451.3 481.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.4 449.5 481.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.8 401.7 439.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 403.7 446.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite Model: NASNet Mobile OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: NASNet Mobile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 2146.20, N = 15 SE +/- 2393.85, N = 15 132844 134044
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.6 453.0 481.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.2 453.6 483.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 451.8 481.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 451.2 480.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Tachyon CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.0 397.8 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 402.8 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tachyon 0.99b6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Swet CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 125.9 128.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 127.1 130.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Swet 1.5.16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Swet Average OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Swet 1.5.16 Average CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.2M 2.4M 3.6M 4.8M 6M 5450163.70 5408272.60
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 175.7 352.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 175.7 360.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
SVT-VP9 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.468 0.936 1.404 1.872 2.34 1.97 2.08
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 175.3 361.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 176.2 363.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
SVT-VP9 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.4748 0.9496 1.4244 1.8992 2.374 2.07 2.11
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.5 184.0 372.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.4 185.8 379.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
SVT-VP9 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.3915 0.783 1.1745 1.566 1.9575 1.68 1.74
SVT-VP9 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 15.29, N = 15 SE +/- 4.21, N = 15 309.61 323.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 152.9 301.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 73.8 154.7 305.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.0 227.7 514.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 229.6 530.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0068 0.0136 0.0204 0.0272 0.034 0.03 0.03
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.4 207.6 386.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 209.8 388.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0743 0.1486 0.2229 0.2972 0.3715 0.33 0.33
Stockfish CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 439.2 492.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 60.1 439.1 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stockfish 12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Stockfish Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Stockfish 12 Total Time CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K 218753.45 220989.94
SQLite Speedtest CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 129.6 131.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 131.3 133.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 128.1 129.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 129.7 130.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: DistinctUserID OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 128.9 131.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 130.5 132.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: Kostya OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: Kostya CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 128.6 131.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 129.9 132.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: LargeRandom OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: LargeRandom CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.4 128.3 129.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 128.6 130.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: PartialTweets OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: PartialTweets CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 156.2 253.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 157.6 257.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.7 216.9 281.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 215.0 284.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.4 285.4 336.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 281.6 334.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 433.4 492.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 430.6 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.9 253.1 370.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 253.4 373.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Rodinia Test: OpenMP CFD Solver OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.053, N = 5 SE +/- 0.141, N = 15 8.510 8.882 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
TTSIOD 3D Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.0 243.0 271.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 242.4 266.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
TTSIOD 3D Renderer Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.6165 1.233 1.8495 2.466 3.0825 2.74 2.70
Primesieve CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.3 310.0 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 309.6 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 7.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 121.23 / Avg: 291.09 / Max: 365.95 Min: 120.81 / Avg: 287.74 / Max: 365.75
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 0.08 0.08
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60 120 180 240 300 Min: 120.32 / Avg: 284.73 / Max: 343.46 Min: 120.47 / Avg: 284.69 / Max: 345.62
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0203 0.0406 0.0609 0.0812 0.1015 0.09 0.09
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 82.95 / Avg: 160.37 / Max: 200.84 Min: 77.57 / Avg: 156.39 / Max: 196.21
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0068 0.0136 0.0204 0.0272 0.034 0.03 0.03
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 346.7 488.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 346.7 488.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Intel Open Image Denoise Scene: Memorial OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 0.08 0.08
Numpy Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 131.7 141.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 133.2 142.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Numpy Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.5535 1.107 1.6605 2.214 2.7675 2.46 2.43
Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.5 178.5 280.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 179.4 280.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.62, N = 14 SE +/- 0.56, N = 12 25.04 24.63 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -ffree-line-length-0 -Jsource/ -fopenmp -O3 -fno-backtrace
Timed MrBayes Analysis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.2 465.5 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.9 467.9 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 120.77 / Avg: 339.16 / Max: 492.27 Min: 120.62 / Avg: 341.54 / Max: 492.22
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 35.45, N = 15 SE +/- 3.00, N = 3 1247.48 1123.32 MIN: 1069.01 MIN: 1077.56 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.7 278.8 480.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 274.8 455.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.1 239.4 430.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 235.0 415.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.0 280.4 481.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 279.6 482.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.0 284.2 491.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.8 285.6 468.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.8 332.1 492.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 331.1 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LuxCoreRender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 122.2 461.6 493.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.7 461.8 493.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LuxCoreRender Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0045 0.009 0.0135 0.018 0.0225 0.02 0.02
LuxCoreRender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 122.0 458.4 493.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 459.0 493.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LuxCoreRender Scene: DLSC OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0045 0.009 0.0135 0.018 0.0225 0.02 0.02
LeelaChessZero CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.9 428.4 492.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.4 424.2 492.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: Eigen CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 10.39 10.45
LeelaChessZero CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.0 426.6 492.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 417.7 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LeelaChessZero Backend: BLAS OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: BLAS CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 9.72 9.72
InfluxDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.9 205.3 232.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 188.3 217.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec Per Watt, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 6626.07 6672.14
InfluxDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 192.6 218.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 167.2 187.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec Per Watt, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 4963.60 4857.31
KeyDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 60.8 172.1 190.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 64.4 157.7 178.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
KeyDB OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec Per Watt, More Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1761.51 1865.16
KeyDB OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 5131.54, N = 15 SE +/- 3012.50, N = 15 303171.33 294214.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
John The Ripper CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 122.1 390.2 430.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 391.6 433.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
John The Ripper Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40 80 120 160 200 183.88 185.47
John The Ripper CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 122.4 458.8 492.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 122.0 457.3 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
John The Ripper Test: MD5 OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10378.20 10084.88
High Performance Conjugate Gradient CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 363.8 399.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 363.8 391.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
High Performance Conjugate Gradient OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s Per Watt, More Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0203 0.0406 0.0609 0.0812 0.1015 0.09 0.08
Hierarchical INTegration CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 64.2 127.7 129.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 64.8 129.4 131.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Hierarchical INTegration Test: FLOAT OpenBenchmarking.org QUIPs Per Watt, More Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 2527557.17 2496420.85
Himeno Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.2 132.8 135.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 134.2 136.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 7 14 21 28 35 31.13 31.94
NAMD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 122.0 422.4 492.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 423.2 492.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
GROMACS CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.4 424.3 488.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.3 421.6 491.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GROMACS 2020.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
GROMACS Water Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day Per Watt, More Is Better GROMACS 2020.3 Water Benchmark CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
GPAW CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.3 403.9 464.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 404.8 464.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GPAW 20.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
CLOMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 151.3 312.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 152.6 321.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better CLOMP 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
CLOMP Static OMP Speedup OpenBenchmarking.org Speedup Per Watt, More Is Better CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0698 0.1396 0.2094 0.2792 0.349 0.31 0.31
FFTW CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 65.17 / Avg: 132.11 / Max: 150.06 Min: 120.07 / Avg: 133.11 / Max: 142.83
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops Per Watt, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 131.21 127.83
FFTE CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.3 270.8 488.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.3 272.3 488.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFTE 7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
FFTE N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 140 280 420 560 700 664.85 656.40
YafaRay CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better YafaRay 3.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 120.76 / Avg: 313.28 / Max: 374.38 Min: 77.37 / Avg: 312.46 / Max: 377.49
POV-Ray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.6 327.6 492.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 329.6 492.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.1 343.6 488.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 341.0 480.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.6 168.2 482.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 171.8 482.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0743 0.1486 0.2229 0.2972 0.3715 0.33 0.32
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.7 362.0 487.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 361.1 488.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0113 0.0226 0.0339 0.0452 0.0565 0.05 0.05
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.3 241.6 481.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.4 238.8 480.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0675 0.135 0.2025 0.27 0.3375 0.30 0.30
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.9 421.1 490.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 420.8 490.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.1 378.9 489.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 379.8 489.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0068 0.0136 0.0204 0.0272 0.034 0.03 0.03
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.4 167.3 303.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 151.8 245.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.4478 0.8956 1.3434 1.7912 2.239 1.99 1.65
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 314.6 450.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.6 309.6 449.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0248 0.0496 0.0744 0.0992 0.124 0.10 0.11
Dolfyn CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 129.9 132.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 130.2 133.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Dolfyn 0.527 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.2 171.7 314.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 165.5 309.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 149.7 216.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 140.5 200.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 138.2 194.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 137.8 195.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 139.4 180.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 60.6 134.4 163.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: H2 OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 70.06, N = 20 SE +/- 73.65, N = 20 4570 5217
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 131.7 143.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 133.7 144.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 80.12 78.46
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 131.7 143.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 133.2 144.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 79.05 80.07
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 71.1 136.9 143.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 139.0 145.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 81.46 81.34
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.0 153.7 222.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 150.7 214.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12 24 36 48 60 50.56 54.88
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 648.67, N = 12 SE +/- 69.07, N = 3 7770.3 8270.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
BYTE Unix Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.0 125.8 133.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 125.1 132.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
BYTE Unix Benchmark Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 OpenBenchmarking.org LPS Per Watt, More Is Better BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K 307169.01 306193.49
Build2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.9 256.5 506.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 244.2 493.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
BRL-CAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.4 469.1 492.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 464.8 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better BRL-CAD 7.30.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
BRL-CAD VGR Performance Metric OpenBenchmarking.org VGR Performance Metric Per Watt, More Is Better BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 1355.13 1369.51
BlogBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 234.2 328.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 232.1 341.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better BlogBench 1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score Per Watt, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 4638.96 4752.60
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.2 434.6 494.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 423.5 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.90 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 417.1 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 383.9 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.3 247.5 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 217.2 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
asmFish CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.2 466.4 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 453.3 491.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
asmFish 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes/second Per Watt, More Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K 251626.25 259519.18
ASKAP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.5 343.1 458.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.8 294.9 460.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 9 18 27 36 45 33.50 40.51
AI Benchmark Alpha CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 250.8 388.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 214.7 378.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
AI Benchmark Alpha Device AI Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device AI Score CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 11.59 12.98
TNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 65.3 127.9 130.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 129.8 132.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
TNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.6 155.3 165.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 73.7 143.3 175.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Google SynthMark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.0 128.2 130.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.8 129.0 131.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Google SynthMark Test: VoiceMark_100 OpenBenchmarking.org Voices Per Watt, More Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.2533 2.5066 3.7599 5.0132 6.2665 5.57 5.54
RELION CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 119.71 / Avg: 480.54 / Max: 494.18 Min: 119.68 / Avg: 480.3 / Max: 492.94
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 124.2 136.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.6 123.6 132.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: SADD OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 12966.74 13036.25
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 124.9 134.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 124.5 132.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: LPUSH OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10016.27 9780.17
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 124.0 135.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 123.6 133.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: GET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 14375.86 13846.04
Redis Test: GET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 32510.57, N = 12 SE +/- 12716.89, N = 11 1782755.97 1711621.52 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 124.5 135.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 124.1 134.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: SET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 11683.85 11500.61
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 148.6 157.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 147.6 157.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
rav1e Speed: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 143.6 155.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 143.3 155.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
rav1e Speed: 5 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 74.7 143.0 152.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 74.9 142.0 151.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
rav1e Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 138.6 146.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 136.5 145.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
rav1e Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0045 0.009 0.0135 0.018 0.0225 0.02 0.02
QuantLib CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.3 130.8 133.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 132.0 134.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
QuantLib OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 16.49 16.34
QMCPACK CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.6 438.1 491.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 437.6 491.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Quantum ESPRESSO CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 70.27 / Avg: 389.94 / Max: 492.33 Min: 120.56 / Avg: 385.69 / Max: 492.5
OpenFOAM CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.1 290.0 399.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 290.6 400.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
OpenFOAM CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.9 309.6 472.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.2 309.5 472.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 50 100 150 200 250 Min: 121.3 / Avg: 270.44 / Max: 293.8 Min: 121.22 / Avg: 275.85 / Max: 301.54
ONNX Runtime Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 15.49 15.26
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.3 263.5 278.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.1 263.9 279.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
ONNX Runtime Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1575 0.315 0.4725 0.63 0.7875 0.70 0.69
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.1 329.7 405.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 328.7 407.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: LU.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 100 200 300 400 500 466.44 469.62
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.4 375.8 430.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 377.2 446.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.D OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 10.29 10.24
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 216.2 410.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 218.1 411.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 17.84 17.62
LULESH CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.7 245.4 341.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 244.8 342.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
LULESH OpenBenchmarking.org z/s Per Watt, More Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 78.80 80.77
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.0 427.6 439.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 428.6 441.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: 20k Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0135 0.027 0.0405 0.054 0.0675 0.06 0.06
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.5 176.0 401.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 176.6 409.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: Rhodopsin Protein OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0315 0.063 0.0945 0.126 0.1575 0.14 0.13
IOR CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.4 211.4 225.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 209.5 223.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better IOR 3.3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
IOR Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.5738 1.1476 1.7214 2.2952 2.869 2.55 2.49
IOR CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 196.2 215.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 195.2 214.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better IOR 3.3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
IOR Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.594 1.188 1.782 2.376 2.97 2.64 2.43
GnuPG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 129.3 132.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 129.8 131.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GnuPG 2.2.27 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Gcrypt Library CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 63.3 127.6 131.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 129.2 133.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Gcrypt Library 1.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
FinanceBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 168.6 185.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 169.8 186.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
FinanceBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 171.0 184.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 171.1 185.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Etcpak CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 127.4 128.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 128.7 130.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Etcpak Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s Per Watt, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.2745 0.549 0.8235 1.098 1.3725 1.22 1.21
Etcpak CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 127.0 129.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.6 128.2 130.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s Per Watt, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.4343 0.8686 1.3029 1.7372 2.1715 1.93 1.91
Etcpak CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 126.8 129.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.5 127.5 129.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s Per Watt, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.4748 0.9496 1.4244 1.8992 2.374 2.11 2.10
dav1d CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.6 150.2 248.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 144.8 190.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.2723 0.5446 0.8169 1.0892 1.3615 1.21 0.92
dav1d CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 197.5 386.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 184.4 344.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.414 0.828 1.242 1.656 2.07 1.84 1.72
Cython Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.3 130.1 133.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 129.5 131.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.6 147.5 245.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 127.4 169.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 1315.46 1091.62
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 72.0 144.2 193.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 125.6 144.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Skeincoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3625.65 2897.78
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Skeincoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 110K 220K 330K 440K 550K SE +/- 9614.65, N = 12 SE +/- 5604.68, N = 12 522948 364017 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.5 171.8 441.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 75.9 166.1 473.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Garlicoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 13 26 39 52 65 57.99 59.91
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.5 254.4 424.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 253.8 480.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: x25x OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 6.04 6.08
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.9 145.0 174.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 125.9 138.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 2898.85 2358.08
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 19086.02, N = 12 SE +/- 5314.19, N = 12 420231 296995 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Timed LLVM Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.1 322.9 492.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 64.9 318.0 492.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.3 290.5 492.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 284.2 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.7 167.0 492.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 159.2 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 99.7 278.9 492.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 276.3 492.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 77.8 309.8 419.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 76.7 312.8 412.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit Per Watt, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1000K 2000K 3000K 4000K 5000K 4634187.41 4631994.74
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4