AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 - Perf Governor 2 x AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core testing looking at CPU freq invariance on 5.11 with patch. CPU power consumption monitoring via AMD_Energy interface at 1 second polling. Additional data with CPUFreq performance governor included.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2101273-SYST-210125309&sor&grr .
AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 - Perf Governor Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver Compiler File-System Screen Resolution CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2 x AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core @ 3.20GHz (48 Cores / 96 Threads) Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS) AMD Starship/Matisse 16 x 8192 MB DDR4-3200MT/s HMA81GR7CJR8N-XN 1000GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 1TB ASPEED VE228 2 x Intel 10G X550T Ubuntu 20.10 5.11.0-rc4-max-boost-inv-patch (x86_64) 20210121 GNOME Shell 3.38.1 X Server 1.20.9 modesetting 1.20.9 GCC 10.2.0 ext4 1920x1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-10-JvwpWM/gcc-10-10.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-10-JvwpWM/gcc-10-10.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v Disk Details - NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096 Processor Details - CPUFreq Schedutil: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x8301034 - CPUFreq Performance: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x8301034 Java Details - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.10) Python Details - Python 3.8.6 Security Details - itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 - Perf Governor qe: AUSURF112 relion: Basic - CPU lczero: BLAS fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 4096 svt-av1: Enc Mode 0 - 1080p plaidml: No - Inference - VGG19 - CPU plaidml: No - Inference - ResNet 50 - CPU plaidml: No - Inference - VGG16 - CPU yafaray: Total Time For Sample Scene blogbench: Read ai-benchmark: Device AI Score ai-benchmark: Device Training Score ai-benchmark: Device Inference Score lczero: Eigen keydb: lammps: 20k Atoms brl-cad: VGR Performance Metric hint: FLOAT tensorflow-lite: NASNet Mobile onnx: super-resolution-10 - OpenMP CPU numpy: gcrypt: onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - f32 - CPU build-llvm: Time To Compile openfoam: Motorbike 60M tensorflow-lite: SqueezeNet v-ray: CPU john-the-ripper: MD5 blender: Barbershop - CPU-Only asmfish: 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth cpuminer-opt: Garlicoin hpcg: cpuminer-opt: x25x cpuminer-opt: Skeincoin cpuminer-opt: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite tensorflow-lite: Inception ResNet V2 onnx: yolov4 - OpenMP CPU byte: Dhrystone 2 influxdb: 4 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 neat: rodinia: OpenMP HotSpot3D tensorflow-lite: Mobilenet Quant build-gdb: Time To Compile compress-zstd: 3 dav1d: Chimera 1080p 10-bit compress-lz4: 3 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Compression Speed influxdb: 64 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 ior: 8MB - Default Test Directory mrbayes: Primate Phylogeny Analysis build-linux-kernel: Time To Compile redis: SET ttsiod-renderer: Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping gnupg: 2.7GB Sample File Encryption ospray: San Miguel - Path Tracer dacapobench: Tradebeans tungsten: Water Caustic simdjson: Kostya sqlite-speedtest: Timed Time - Size 1,000 build2: Time To Compile financebench: Bonds OpenMP dacapobench: H2 onednn: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - f32 - CPU compress-lz4: 9 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Compression Speed tensorflow-lite: Inception V4 luxcorerender: DLSC luxcorerender: Rainbow Colors and Prism redis: GET gpaw: Carbon Nanotube tensorflow-lite: Mobilenet Float build-godot: Time To Compile simdjson: LargeRand himeno: Poisson Pressure Solver rav1e: 5 simdjson: PartialTweets rav1e: 1 simdjson: DistinctUserID rodinia: OpenMP LavaMD rodinia: OpenMP Leukocyte redis: SADD clomp: Static OMP Speedup financebench: Repo OpenMP astcenc: Exhaustive svt-av1: Enc Mode 8 - 1080p rav1e: 6 ospray: San Miguel - SciVis gromacs: Water Benchmark ospray: XFrog Forest - Path Tracer npb: EP.D quantlib: stockfish: Total Time x265: Bosphorus 1080p swet: Average etcpak: ETC2 dav1d: Summer Nature 4K cpuminer-opt: LBC, LBRY Credits compress-lz4: 1 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 1 - Compression Speed askap: tConvolve MPI - Degridding askap: tConvolve MPI - Gridding john-the-ripper: Blowfish synthmark: VoiceMark_100 x265: Bosphorus 4K qmcpack: simple-H2O rodinia: OpenMP CFD Solver rav1e: 10 openfoam: Motorbike 30M cython-bench: N-Queens namd: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms ospray: XFrog Forest - SciVis ior: 2MB - Default Test Directory ospray: NASA Streamlines - Path Tracer tnn: CPU - MobileNet v2 onednn: IP Shapes 1D - f32 - CPU svt-av1: Enc Mode 4 - 1080p etcpak: ETC1 + Dithering amg: tachyon: Total Time tnn: CPU - SqueezeNet v1.1 dolfyn: Computational Fluid Dynamics npb: LU.C redis: LPUSH etcpak: ETC1 povray: Trace Time astcenc: Thorough tungsten: Volumetric Caustic rodinia: OpenMP Streamcluster dacapobench: Tradesoap lulesh: onednn: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - f32 - CPU ffte: N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine svt-vp9: Visual Quality Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p onednn: IP Shapes 3D - f32 - CPU ospray: Magnetic Reconnection - SciVis onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - f32 - CPU oidn: Memorial tungsten: Hair ospray: NASA Streamlines - SciVis dacapobench: Jython svt-vp9: VMAF Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p primesieve: 1e12 Prime Number Generation npb: EP.C svt-vp9: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p ospray: Magnetic Reconnection - Path Tracer lammps: Rhodopsin Protein tscp: AI Chess Performance CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1171.03 348.294 4061 17015 0.091 22.49 4.63 25.42 87.143 1103118 2787 1067 1720 4433 294214.37 25.077 636521 323144417.17197 134044 4210 323.00 232.542 1123.32 208.786 128.28 62195.4 53460 4612308 156.83 117632955 9949.88 30.8262 1541.76 364017 296995 736285 181 38319339.8 812193.6 24.633 96.603 41034.0 92.916 8270.5 133.37 10666.0 48.95 1256112.1 520.72 82.042 25.752 1427348.10 655.225 77.179 4.32 5591 21.3329 0.57 70.540 67.322 56769.453125 5217 2.33290 10489.8 47.76 810750 7.80 8.76 1711621.52 59.851 39523.5 59.177 0.36 4286.628309 1.068 0.63 0.372 0.65 52.092 52.684 1611164.34 47.8 39406.757812 40.97 68.231 1.408 54.97 5.261 5.95 3863.45 2157.2 97042601 49.45 687480262 155.798 317.45 139037 11305.0 9757.17 11944.2 7453.51 72636 714.914 19.74 29.281 8.882 3.054 18.30 26.604 0.44472 11.19 475.25 16.39 289.764 1.55447 7.648 245.595 1448718333 18.0565 274.869 18.652 154376.76 1217218.75 267.587 11.305 5.65 5.26235 10.338 5148 19771.223 0.521968 178738.12497094 323.81 0.849248 32.62 0.863782 28.39 6.69036 71.43 4778 364.81 4.535 3841.48 371.48 250 23.787 1114562 1249.06 348.338 4147 17335 0.091 22.43 4.66 25.22 87.331 1086347 2908 1133 1775 4450 303171.33 25.116 635725 322775283.80125 132844 4190 324.48 232.760 1247.48 208.043 128.81 61347.2 55014 4762000 158.07 117370871 9964.35 30.9260 1537.52 522948 420231 737993 185 38656226.3 956189.4 25.037 96.885 41180.1 85.277 7770.3 181.95 10410.3 49.29 1360163.0 539.63 82.261 25.414 1454741.42 665.448 77.022 4.33 4671 21.4652 0.57 69.883 67.334 56094.488281 4570 2.30467 10555.1 48.02 818887 7.89 8.76 1782755.97 59.757 39981.9 58.746 0.37 4135.519154 1.095 0.63 0.375 0.65 52.360 51.290 1610484.50 47.4 39948.356771 41.07 68.465 1.446 55.56 5.255 5.95 3867.30 2156.3 96082114 62.29 686132109 155.783 363.33 194087 11150.6 9651.61 11492.9 7441.95 71757 714.181 20.75 28.971 8.510 3.177 18.29 26.895 0.44469 11.19 517.33 16.39 297.132 1.57963 7.488 245.453 1444174667 18.2004 274.097 18.635 153770.57 1251006.00 267.136 11.427 5.67 5.31183 10.432 4621 19334.862 0.514604 180037.95358586 309.61 0.813628 32.80 0.867545 28.33 6.69505 71.43 4740 346.71 4.489 3857.33 363.18 333.33 24.639 1116255 OpenBenchmarking.org
Quantum ESPRESSO Input: AUSURF112 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 Input: AUSURF112 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 12.21, N = 4 SE +/- 19.05, N = 9 1171.03 1249.06 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -lopenblas -lFoX_dom -lFoX_sax -lFoX_wxml -lFoX_common -lFoX_utils -lFoX_fsys -lfftw3 -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz
RELION Test: Basic - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 Test: Basic - Device: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 2.97, N = 9 SE +/- 3.10, N = 9 348.29 348.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -std=c++0x -O3 -rdynamic -ldl -ltiff -lfftw3f -lfftw3 -lpng -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
LeelaChessZero Backend: BLAS OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: BLAS CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 17.79, N = 3 SE +/- 49.90, N = 9 4147 4061 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -pthread
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 199.64, N = 9 SE +/- 213.45, N = 3 17335 17015 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0205 0.041 0.0615 0.082 0.1025 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 12 0.091 0.091 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.16, N = 15 SE +/- 0.20, N = 15 22.49 22.43
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.0485 2.097 3.1455 4.194 5.2425 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 4.66 4.63
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.30, N = 15 SE +/- 0.24, N = 15 25.42 25.22
YafaRay Total Time For Sample Scene OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better YafaRay 3.4.1 Total Time For Sample Scene CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.85, N = 15 SE +/- 0.69, N = 15 87.14 87.33 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -O3 -ffast-math -rdynamic -ldl -lImath -lIlmImf -lIex -lHalf -lz -lIlmThread -lxml2 -lfreetype -lpthread
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1738.41, N = 3 SE +/- 13508.02, N = 3 1103118 1086347 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
AI Benchmark Alpha Device AI Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device AI Score CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 2908 2787
AI Benchmark Alpha Device Training Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Training Score CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 200 400 600 800 1000 1133 1067
AI Benchmark Alpha Device Inference Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Inference Score CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1775 1720
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: Eigen CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 26.71, N = 3 SE +/- 36.23, N = 3 4450 4433 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -pthread
KeyDB OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 5131.54, N = 15 SE +/- 3012.50, N = 15 303171.33 294214.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: 20k Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 25.12 25.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lm
BRL-CAD VGR Performance Metric OpenBenchmarking.org VGR Performance Metric, More Is Better BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K 636521 635725 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fexceptions -ftemplate-depth-128 -m64 -ggdb3 -O3 -fipa-pta -fstrength-reduce -finline-functions -flto -pedantic -rdynamic -lSM -lICE -lXi -lGLU -lGL -lGLdispatch -lX11 -lXext -lXrender -lpthread -ldl -luuid -lm
Hierarchical INTegration Test: FLOAT OpenBenchmarking.org QUIPs, More Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 70M 140M 210M 280M 350M SE +/- 122621.60, N = 3 SE +/- 201175.83, N = 3 323144417.17 322775283.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lm
TensorFlow Lite Model: NASNet Mobile OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: NASNet Mobile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 2146.20, N = 15 SE +/- 2393.85, N = 15 132844 134044
ONNX Runtime Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 44.10, N = 3 SE +/- 68.07, N = 12 4210 4190 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -ldl -lrt
Numpy Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 324.48 323.00
Gcrypt Library OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Gcrypt Library 1.9 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.81, N = 3 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 232.54 232.76 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -fvisibility=hidden -lgpg-error
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 3.00, N = 3 SE +/- 35.45, N = 15 1123.32 1247.48 MIN: 1077.56 MIN: 1069.01 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
Timed LLVM Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.78, N = 3 SE +/- 0.79, N = 3 208.04 208.79
OpenFOAM Input: Motorbike 60M OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 60M CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 128.28 128.81 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -m64 -O3 -ftemplate-depth-100 -fPIC -fuse-ld=bfd -Xlinker --add-needed --no-as-needed -lfoamToVTK -ldynamicMesh -llagrangian -lgenericPatchFields -lfileFormats -lOpenFOAM -ldl -lm
TensorFlow Lite Model: SqueezeNet OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: SqueezeNet CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 715.70, N = 4 SE +/- 412.91, N = 15 61347.2 62195.4
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Ksamples, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 503.58, N = 3 SE +/- 1018.74, N = 13 55014 53460
John The Ripper Test: MD5 OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1000K 2000K 3000K 4000K 5000K SE +/- 7371.11, N = 3 SE +/- 54344.04, N = 13 4762000 4612308 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -pthread -lm -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2
Blender Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.90 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.95, N = 3 156.83 158.07
asmFish 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes/second, More Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 30M 60M 90M 120M 150M SE +/- 358515.89, N = 3 SE +/- 1411556.16, N = 4 117632955 117370871
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Garlicoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 155.17, N = 14 SE +/- 99.38, N = 15 9964.35 9949.88 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
High Performance Conjugate Gradient OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 30.93 30.83 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: x25x OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 17.73, N = 15 SE +/- 11.04, N = 12 1541.76 1537.52 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Skeincoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 110K 220K 330K 440K 550K SE +/- 9614.65, N = 12 SE +/- 5604.68, N = 12 522948 364017 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 19086.02, N = 12 SE +/- 5314.19, N = 12 420231 296995 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
TensorFlow Lite Model: Inception ResNet V2 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception ResNet V2 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 5824.36, N = 9 SE +/- 2132.19, N = 3 736285 737993
ONNX Runtime Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.62, N = 3 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 185 181 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -ldl -lrt
BYTE Unix Benchmark Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 OpenBenchmarking.org LPS, More Is Better BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 8M 16M 24M 32M 40M SE +/- 498492.56, N = 3 SE +/- 341040.65, N = 3 38656226.3 38319339.8
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 2401.68, N = 3 SE +/- 1525.09, N = 3 956189.4 812193.6
Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.56, N = 12 SE +/- 0.62, N = 14 24.63 25.04 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -ffree-line-length-0 -Jsource/ -fopenmp -O3 -fno-backtrace
Rodinia Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.59, N = 3 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 96.60 96.89 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
TensorFlow Lite Model: Mobilenet Quant OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Quant CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 400.94, N = 6 SE +/- 211.03, N = 3 41034.0 41180.1
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 Time To Compile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 85.28 92.92
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 69.07, N = 3 SE +/- 648.67, N = 12 8270.5 7770.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 181.95 133.37 MIN: 125.32 / MAX: 275.36 MIN: 92.59 / MAX: 205.11 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 60.61, N = 3 SE +/- 61.51, N = 5 10666.0 10410.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.52, N = 5 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 49.29 48.95 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 9433.94, N = 3 SE +/- 2545.78, N = 3 1360163.0 1256112.1
IOR Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 5.78, N = 3 SE +/- 2.63, N = 3 539.63 520.72 MIN: 280.44 / MAX: 1002.78 MIN: 176.53 / MAX: 1089.46 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -pthread -lmpi
Timed MrBayes Analysis Primate Phylogeny Analysis OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 82.04 82.26 1. (CC) gcc options: -mmmx -msse -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -msha -maes -mavx -mfma -mavx2 -mrdrnd -mbmi -mbmi2 -madx -mabm -O3 -std=c99 -pedantic -lm
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.19, N = 10 SE +/- 0.20, N = 9 25.41 25.75
Redis Test: SET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 10017.79, N = 13 SE +/- 13176.39, N = 15 1454741.42 1427348.10 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
TTSIOD 3D Renderer Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 5.92, N = 15 SE +/- 3.22, N = 3 665.45 655.23 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -mtune=native -flto -msse -mrecip -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -mssse3 -lSDL -fopenmp -fwhole-program -lstdc++
GnuPG 2.7GB Sample File Encryption OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 77.02 77.18 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.9743 1.9486 2.9229 3.8972 4.8715 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 4.33 4.32 MIN: 3.65 / MAX: 4.37 MIN: 3.76 / MAX: 4.37
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradebeans OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 52.34, N = 20 SE +/- 66.39, N = 20 4671 5591
Tungsten Renderer Scene: Water Caustic OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Water Caustic CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.21, N = 15 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 21.33 21.47 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -march=znver1 -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lIlmImf -lIlmThread -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lz -ljpeg -lpthread -ldl
simdjson Throughput Test: Kostya OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: Kostya CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1283 0.2566 0.3849 0.5132 0.6415 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.57 0.57 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
SQLite Speedtest Timed Time - Size 1,000 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 69.88 70.54 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lz -lpthread
Build2 Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.13 Time To Compile CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 67.32 67.33
FinanceBench Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 365.12, N = 3 SE +/- 598.50, N = 3 56094.49 56769.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: H2 OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 70.06, N = 20 SE +/- 73.65, N = 20 4570 5217
oneDNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.5249 1.0498 1.5747 2.0996 2.6245 SE +/- 0.02560, N = 15 SE +/- 0.01587, N = 3 2.30467 2.33290 MIN: 1.88 MIN: 2 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 96.09, N = 3 SE +/- 31.24, N = 3 10555.1 10489.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 48.02 47.76 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
TensorFlow Lite Model: Inception V4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception V4 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1163.43, N = 3 SE +/- 4685.69, N = 3 810750 818887
LuxCoreRender Scene: DLSC OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 7.89 7.80 MIN: 7.67 / MAX: 8.57 MIN: 7.61 / MAX: 8.59
LuxCoreRender Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 8.76 8.76 MIN: 8.22 / MAX: 8.86 MIN: 8.31 / MAX: 8.97
Redis Test: GET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 32510.57, N = 12 SE +/- 12716.89, N = 11 1782755.97 1711621.52 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
GPAW Input: Carbon Nanotube OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GPAW 20.1 Input: Carbon Nanotube CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 59.76 59.85 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -shared -fwrapv -O2 -lxc -lblas -lmpi
TensorFlow Lite Model: Mobilenet Float OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Float CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 395.37, N = 3 SE +/- 473.02, N = 3 39523.5 39981.9
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 58.75 59.18
simdjson Throughput Test: LargeRandom OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: LargeRandom CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0833 0.1666 0.2499 0.3332 0.4165 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.37 0.36 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 25.26, N = 3 SE +/- 27.09, N = 3 4286.63 4135.52 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -mavx2
rav1e Speed: 5 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.2464 0.4928 0.7392 0.9856 1.232 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 1.095 1.068
simdjson Throughput Test: PartialTweets OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: PartialTweets CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1418 0.2836 0.4254 0.5672 0.709 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.63 0.63 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
rav1e Speed: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0844 0.1688 0.2532 0.3376 0.422 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.375 0.372
simdjson Throughput Test: DistinctUserID OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1463 0.2926 0.4389 0.5852 0.7315 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.65 0.65 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
Rodinia Test: OpenMP LavaMD OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 52.09 52.36 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rodinia Test: OpenMP Leukocyte OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.69, N = 3 51.29 52.68 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Redis Test: SADD OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 15585.71, N = 4 SE +/- 17675.25, N = 15 1611164.34 1610484.50 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
CLOMP Static OMP Speedup OpenBenchmarking.org Speedup, More Is Better CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 47.8 47.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -lm
FinanceBench Benchmark: Repo OpenMP OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 393.10, N = 3 SE +/- 456.10, N = 3 39406.76 39948.36 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
ASTC Encoder Preset: Exhaustive OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Exhaustive CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 40.97 41.07 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++14 -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -flto -mfpmath=sse -mavx2 -mpopcnt -lpthread
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.65, N = 15 SE +/- 1.05, N = 15 68.47 68.23 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
rav1e Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.3254 0.6508 0.9762 1.3016 1.627 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 1.446 1.408
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 5 55.56 54.97 MIN: 33.33 / MAX: 58.82 MIN: 31.25 / MAX: 58.82
GROMACS Water Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day, More Is Better GROMACS 2020.3 Water Benchmark CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1.1837 2.3674 3.5511 4.7348 5.9185 SE +/- 0.022, N = 3 SE +/- 0.021, N = 3 5.261 5.255 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lrt -lpthread -lm
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.3388 2.6776 4.0164 5.3552 6.694 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 5.95 5.95 MIN: 5.46 / MAX: 6.02 MIN: 5.35 / MAX: 6.02
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.D OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 2.74, N = 3 SE +/- 2.97, N = 3 3867.30 3863.45 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz 2. Open MPI 4.0.3
QuantLib OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 8.27, N = 3 SE +/- 16.02, N = 3 2157.2 2156.3 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic
Stockfish Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Stockfish 12 Total Time CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M SE +/- 769788.53, N = 3 SE +/- 1344259.09, N = 3 97042601 96082114 1. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++17 -pedantic -O3 -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -msse4.1 -mssse3 -msse2 -flto -flto=jobserver
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.73, N = 15 SE +/- 0.52, N = 4 62.29 49.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
Swet Average OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Swet 1.5.16 Average CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 150M 300M 450M 600M 750M SE +/- 1732499.41, N = 3 SE +/- 3454923.88, N = 3 687480262 686132109 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -lcurses -lrt
Etcpak Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 155.80 155.78 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 3.54, N = 15 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 363.33 317.45 MIN: 186.32 / MAX: 403.05 MIN: 173.69 / MAX: 340.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 861.90, N = 3 SE +/- 1380.06, N = 3 194087 139037 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 25.21, N = 3 SE +/- 110.98, N = 3 11305.0 11150.6 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 19.43, N = 3 SE +/- 71.91, N = 3 9757.17 9651.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second, More Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 6.47, N = 3 SE +/- 137.09, N = 3 11944.2 11492.9 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second, More Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 2.90, N = 3 SE +/- 7.65, N = 3 7453.51 7441.95 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread
John The Ripper Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K SE +/- 73.45, N = 3 SE +/- 507.10, N = 3 72636 71757 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -pthread -lm -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2
Google SynthMark Test: VoiceMark_100 OpenBenchmarking.org Voices, More Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 1.18, N = 3 714.91 714.18 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -std=c++11 -Ofast
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 20.75 19.74 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
QMCPACK Input: simple-H2O OpenBenchmarking.org Total Execution Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 28.97 29.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -finline-limit=1000 -fstrict-aliasing -funroll-all-loops -march=native -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -pthread -lm
Rodinia Test: OpenMP CFD Solver OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.053, N = 5 SE +/- 0.141, N = 15 8.510 8.882 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
rav1e Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.7148 1.4296 2.1444 2.8592 3.574 SE +/- 0.018, N = 3 SE +/- 0.008, N = 3 3.177 3.054
OpenFOAM Input: Motorbike 30M OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 18.29 18.30 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -m64 -O3 -ftemplate-depth-100 -fPIC -fuse-ld=bfd -Xlinker --add-needed --no-as-needed -lfoamToVTK -ldynamicMesh -llagrangian -lgenericPatchFields -lfileFormats -lOpenFOAM -ldl -lm
Cython Benchmark Test: N-Queens OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 26.60 26.90
NAMD ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1001 0.2002 0.3003 0.4004 0.5005 SE +/- 0.00075, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00005, N = 3 0.44469 0.44472
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 11.19 11.19 MIN: 7.87 / MAX: 11.36 MIN: 8.2 / MAX: 11.36
IOR Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 5.48, N = 3 SE +/- 2.06, N = 3 517.33 475.25 MIN: 463.44 / MAX: 1007.52 MIN: 400.96 / MAX: 971.55 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -pthread -lmpi
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 16.39 16.39 MIN: 10.31 / MAX: 16.95 MIN: 10.99 / MAX: 16.95
TNN Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.83, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 289.76 297.13 MIN: 283.65 / MAX: 458.79 MIN: 295.49 / MAX: 320.4 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -rdynamic -ldl
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.3554 0.7108 1.0662 1.4216 1.777 SE +/- 0.01340, N = 4 SE +/- 0.01359, N = 4 1.55447 1.57963 MIN: 1.29 MIN: 1.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.029, N = 4 SE +/- 0.031, N = 4 7.648 7.488 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 245.60 245.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300M 600M 900M 1200M 1500M SE +/- 750486.58, N = 3 SE +/- 4018322.42, N = 3 1448718333 1444174667 1. (CC) gcc options: -lparcsr_ls -lparcsr_mv -lseq_mv -lIJ_mv -lkrylov -lHYPRE_utilities -lm -fopenmp -pthread -lmpi
Tachyon Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 18.06 18.20 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -ltachyon -lm -lpthread
TNN Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 274.10 274.87 MIN: 273.16 / MAX: 274.86 MIN: 273.07 / MAX: 276.74 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -rdynamic -ldl
Dolfyn Computational Fluid Dynamics OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.64 18.65
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: LU.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 509.59, N = 4 SE +/- 121.33, N = 4 154376.76 153770.57 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz 2. Open MPI 4.0.3
Redis Test: LPUSH OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 11397.44, N = 3 SE +/- 13782.67, N = 3 1251006.00 1217218.75 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 267.59 267.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
POV-Ray Trace Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.05, N = 4 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 11.31 11.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -pthread -lSDL -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lIlmImf -lIlmImf-2_5 -lImath-2_5 -lHalf-2_5 -lIex-2_5 -lIexMath-2_5 -lIlmThread-2_5 -lIlmThread -ltiff -ljpeg -lpng -lz -lrt -lm -lboost_thread -lboost_system
ASTC Encoder Preset: Thorough OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Thorough CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1.2758 2.5516 3.8274 5.1032 6.379 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 SE +/- 0.01, N = 5 5.65 5.67 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++14 -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -flto -mfpmath=sse -mavx2 -mpopcnt -lpthread
Tungsten Renderer Scene: Volumetric Caustic OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Volumetric Caustic CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1.1952 2.3904 3.5856 4.7808 5.976 SE +/- 0.03676, N = 7 SE +/- 0.03612, N = 13 5.26235 5.31183 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -march=znver1 -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lIlmImf -lIlmThread -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lz -ljpeg -lpthread -ldl
Rodinia Test: OpenMP Streamcluster OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 5 SE +/- 0.04, N = 5 10.34 10.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradesoap OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 42.72, N = 5 SE +/- 61.21, N = 4 4621 5148
LULESH OpenBenchmarking.org z/s, More Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 171.84, N = 5 SE +/- 182.76, N = 5 19771.22 19334.86 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp -lm -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
oneDNN Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1174 0.2348 0.3522 0.4696 0.587 SE +/- 0.005906, N = 4 SE +/- 0.004601, N = 4 0.514604 0.521968 MIN: 0.43 MIN: 0.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
FFTE N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 1616.93, N = 15 SE +/- 1760.31, N = 15 180037.95 178738.12 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fopenmp
SVT-VP9 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 4.21, N = 15 SE +/- 15.29, N = 15 323.81 309.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1911 0.3822 0.5733 0.7644 0.9555 SE +/- 0.005456, N = 5 SE +/- 0.004000, N = 5 0.813628 0.849248 MIN: 0.69 MIN: 0.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.24, N = 6 SE +/- 0.23, N = 6 32.80 32.62 MIN: 13.16 / MAX: 34.48 MIN: 12.82 / MAX: 33.33
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.1952 0.3904 0.5856 0.7808 0.976 SE +/- 0.001510, N = 7 SE +/- 0.001697, N = 7 0.863782 0.867545 MIN: 0.79 MIN: 0.78 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
Intel Open Image Denoise Scene: Memorial OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.04, N = 6 SE +/- 0.17, N = 6 28.39 28.33
Tungsten Renderer Scene: Hair OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Hair CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01480, N = 6 SE +/- 0.06150, N = 6 6.69036 6.69505 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -march=znver1 -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lIlmImf -lIlmThread -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lz -ljpeg -lpthread -ldl
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.00, N = 7 SE +/- 0.00, N = 7 71.43 71.43 MIN: 19.61 / MAX: 76.92 MIN: 19.61 / MAX: 76.92
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Jython OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 20.83, N = 6 SE +/- 43.93, N = 6 4740 4778
SVT-VP9 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.91, N = 10 SE +/- 2.58, N = 15 364.81 346.71 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
Primesieve 1e12 Prime Number Generation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 7.4 1e12 Prime Number Generation CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.0204 2.0408 3.0612 4.0816 5.102 SE +/- 0.008, N = 8 SE +/- 0.015, N = 8 4.489 4.535 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lpthread
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 4.01, N = 10 SE +/- 5.01, N = 10 3857.33 3841.48 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz 2. Open MPI 4.0.3
SVT-VP9 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.70, N = 9 SE +/- 1.84, N = 9 371.48 363.18 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.00, N = 11 333.33 250.00 MIN: 100 / MAX: 500 MIN: 90.91 / MAX: 333.33
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: Rhodopsin Protein OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.19, N = 15 SE +/- 0.17, N = 12 24.64 23.79 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lm
TSCP AI Chess Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 517.61, N = 12 SE +/- 609.97, N = 12 1116255 1114562 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 59.88 / Avg: 280.92 / Max: 530.69 Min: 59.74 / Avg: 285.23 / Max: 514.05
x265 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 238.0 293.2 CPUFreq Performance 120.3 250.4 301.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better x265 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 0.08 0.08
x265 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.1 169.9 202.1 CPUFreq Performance 120.6 200.8 253.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better x265 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0698 0.1396 0.2094 0.2792 0.349 0.31 0.29
Chaos Group V-RAY CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 419.0 492.2 CPUFreq Performance 120.8 421.1 492.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Ksamples Per Watt, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 130.65 127.59
Tungsten Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.3 246.2 358.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 246.3 358.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Tungsten Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 187.1 235.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.6 187.7 234.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Tungsten Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.7 289.5 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 291.2 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
TSCP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 123.8 129.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 123.9 131.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TSCP 1.81 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
TSCP AI Chess Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 9016.56 8992.52
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.7 429.0 458.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 431.6 460.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.8 439.4 470.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 442.7 471.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.4 449.5 481.2 CPUFreq Performance 121.9 451.3 481.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.8 401.7 439.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 403.7 446.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.6 453.0 481.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.2 453.6 483.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 451.2 480.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.8 451.8 481.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Tachyon CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.0 397.8 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 402.8 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tachyon 0.99b6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Swet CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 125.9 128.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 127.1 130.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Swet 1.5.16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Swet Average OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Swet 1.5.16 Average CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.2M 2.4M 3.6M 4.8M 6M 5450163.70 5408272.60
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 175.7 360.6 CPUFreq Performance 119.9 175.7 352.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
SVT-VP9 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.468 0.936 1.404 1.872 2.34 2.08 1.97
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 175.3 361.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 176.2 363.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
SVT-VP9 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.4748 0.9496 1.4244 1.8992 2.374 2.11 2.07
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.5 184.0 372.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.4 185.8 379.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
SVT-VP9 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.3915 0.783 1.1745 1.566 1.9575 1.74 1.68
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 152.9 301.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 73.8 154.7 305.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.0 227.7 514.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 229.6 530.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0068 0.0136 0.0204 0.0272 0.034 0.03 0.03
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.4 207.6 386.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 209.8 388.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0743 0.1486 0.2229 0.2972 0.3715 0.33 0.33
Stockfish CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 60.1 439.1 492.3 CPUFreq Performance 119.9 439.2 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stockfish 12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Stockfish Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Stockfish 12 Total Time CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K 220989.94 218753.45
SQLite Speedtest CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 129.6 131.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 131.3 133.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 128.1 129.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 129.7 130.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: DistinctUserID OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 128.9 131.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 130.5 132.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: Kostya OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: Kostya CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 128.6 131.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 129.9 132.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: LargeRandom OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: LargeRandom CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.4 128.3 129.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 128.6 130.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: PartialTweets OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: PartialTweets CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 156.2 253.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 157.6 257.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 215.0 284.6 CPUFreq Performance 120.7 216.9 281.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 281.6 334.8 CPUFreq Performance 121.4 285.4 336.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 430.6 492.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.8 433.4 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.9 253.1 370.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 253.4 373.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
TTSIOD 3D Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 242.4 266.3 CPUFreq Performance 121.0 243.0 271.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
TTSIOD 3D Renderer Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.6165 1.233 1.8495 2.466 3.0825 2.74 2.70
Primesieve CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 309.6 492.0 CPUFreq Performance 121.3 310.0 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 7.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 120.81 / Avg: 287.74 / Max: 365.75 Min: 121.23 / Avg: 291.09 / Max: 365.95
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 0.08 0.08
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 60 120 180 240 300 Min: 120.47 / Avg: 284.69 / Max: 345.62 Min: 120.32 / Avg: 284.73 / Max: 343.46
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0203 0.0406 0.0609 0.0812 0.1015 0.09 0.09
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 77.57 / Avg: 156.39 / Max: 196.21 Min: 82.95 / Avg: 160.37 / Max: 200.84
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0068 0.0136 0.0204 0.0272 0.034 0.03 0.03
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 346.7 488.6 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 346.7 488.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Intel Open Image Denoise Scene: Memorial OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 0.08 0.08
Numpy Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 131.7 141.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 133.2 142.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Numpy Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.5535 1.107 1.6605 2.214 2.7675 2.46 2.43
Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.5 178.5 280.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 179.4 280.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Timed MrBayes Analysis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.2 465.5 492.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.9 467.9 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 120.77 / Avg: 339.16 / Max: 492.27 Min: 120.62 / Avg: 341.54 / Max: 492.22
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 274.8 455.7 CPUFreq Performance 120.7 278.8 480.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 235.0 415.0 CPUFreq Performance 121.1 239.4 430.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 279.6 482.7 CPUFreq Performance 121.0 280.4 481.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.0 284.2 491.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.8 285.6 468.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 331.1 492.0 CPUFreq Performance 121.8 332.1 492.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LuxCoreRender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 122.2 461.6 493.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.7 461.8 493.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LuxCoreRender Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0045 0.009 0.0135 0.018 0.0225 0.02 0.02
LuxCoreRender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 122.0 458.4 493.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 459.0 493.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LuxCoreRender Scene: DLSC OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0045 0.009 0.0135 0.018 0.0225 0.02 0.02
LeelaChessZero CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.4 424.2 492.4 CPUFreq Performance 121.9 428.4 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: Eigen CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3 6 9 12 15 10.45 10.39
LeelaChessZero CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 120.35 / Avg: 417.68 / Max: 492.34 Min: 121.03 / Avg: 426.62 / Max: 492.36
LeelaChessZero Backend: BLAS OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: BLAS CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 9.72 9.72
InfluxDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 188.3 217.2 CPUFreq Performance 120.9 205.3 232.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec Per Watt, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 6672.14 6626.07
InfluxDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 167.2 187.5 CPUFreq Performance 120.8 192.6 218.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec Per Watt, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 4963.60 4857.31
KeyDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 64.4 157.7 178.6 CPUFreq Performance 60.8 172.1 190.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
KeyDB OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec Per Watt, More Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1865.16 1761.51
John The Ripper CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 122.1 390.2 430.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 391.6 433.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
John The Ripper Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 40 80 120 160 200 185.47 183.88
John The Ripper CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 122.0 457.3 492.3 CPUFreq Performance 122.4 458.8 492.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
John The Ripper Test: MD5 OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10378.20 10084.88
High Performance Conjugate Gradient CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 363.8 399.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 363.8 391.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
High Performance Conjugate Gradient OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s Per Watt, More Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0203 0.0406 0.0609 0.0812 0.1015 0.09 0.08
Hierarchical INTegration CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 64.2 127.7 129.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 64.8 129.4 131.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Hierarchical INTegration Test: FLOAT OpenBenchmarking.org QUIPs Per Watt, More Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 2527557.17 2496420.85
Himeno Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.2 132.8 135.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 134.2 136.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 7 14 21 28 35 31.94 31.13
NAMD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 122.0 422.4 492.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 423.2 492.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
GROMACS CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.3 421.6 491.7 CPUFreq Performance 121.4 424.3 488.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GROMACS 2020.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
GROMACS Water Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day Per Watt, More Is Better GROMACS 2020.3 Water Benchmark CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
GPAW CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.3 403.9 464.2 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 404.8 464.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GPAW 20.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
CLOMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 151.3 312.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 152.6 321.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better CLOMP 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
CLOMP Static OMP Speedup OpenBenchmarking.org Speedup Per Watt, More Is Better CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0698 0.1396 0.2094 0.2792 0.349 0.31 0.31
FFTW CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 65.17 / Avg: 132.11 / Max: 150.06 Min: 120.07 / Avg: 133.11 / Max: 142.83
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops Per Watt, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 131.21 127.83
FFTE CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.3 270.8 488.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.3 272.3 488.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFTE 7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
FFTE N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 140 280 420 560 700 664.85 656.40
YafaRay CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better YafaRay 3.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 77.37 / Avg: 312.46 / Max: 377.49 Min: 120.76 / Avg: 313.28 / Max: 374.38
POV-Ray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.6 327.6 492.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 329.6 492.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 341.0 480.2 CPUFreq Performance 120.1 343.6 488.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.6 168.2 482.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 171.8 482.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0743 0.1486 0.2229 0.2972 0.3715 0.33 0.32
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 361.1 488.0 CPUFreq Performance 120.7 362.0 487.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0113 0.0226 0.0339 0.0452 0.0565 0.05 0.05
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.4 238.8 480.3 CPUFreq Performance 121.3 241.6 481.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0675 0.135 0.2025 0.27 0.3375 0.30 0.30
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 420.8 490.6 CPUFreq Performance 120.9 421.1 490.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.1 378.9 489.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 379.8 489.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0068 0.0136 0.0204 0.0272 0.034 0.03 0.03
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 151.8 245.9 CPUFreq Performance 120.4 167.3 303.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.4478 0.8956 1.3434 1.7912 2.239 1.99 1.65
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.6 309.6 449.8 CPUFreq Performance 119.7 314.6 450.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0248 0.0496 0.0744 0.0992 0.124 0.11 0.10
Dolfyn CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 129.9 132.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 130.2 133.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Dolfyn 0.527 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 165.5 309.0 CPUFreq Performance 120.2 171.7 314.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 140.5 200.9 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 149.7 216.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 137.8 195.6 CPUFreq Performance 119.9 138.2 194.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 60.6 134.4 163.7 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 139.4 180.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 131.7 143.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 133.7 144.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 80.12 78.46
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 131.7 143.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 133.2 144.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20 40 60 80 100 80.07 79.05
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 71.1 136.9 143.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 139.0 145.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 81.46 81.34
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 150.7 214.6 CPUFreq Performance 120.0 153.7 222.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 12 24 36 48 60 54.88 50.56
BYTE Unix Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 125.1 132.4 CPUFreq Performance 120.0 125.8 133.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
BYTE Unix Benchmark Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 OpenBenchmarking.org LPS Per Watt, More Is Better BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K 307169.01 306193.49
Build2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 244.2 493.2 CPUFreq Performance 120.9 256.5 506.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
BRL-CAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 464.8 492.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.4 469.1 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better BRL-CAD 7.30.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
BRL-CAD VGR Performance Metric OpenBenchmarking.org VGR Performance Metric Per Watt, More Is Better BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300 600 900 1200 1500 1369.51 1355.13
BlogBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 232.1 341.5 CPUFreq Performance 120.8 234.2 328.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better BlogBench 1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score Per Watt, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 4752.60 4638.96
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 423.5 492.3 CPUFreq Performance 121.2 434.6 494.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.90 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 383.9 492.0 CPUFreq Performance 120.8 417.1 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 217.2 492.0 CPUFreq Performance 121.3 247.5 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
asmFish CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 453.3 491.9 CPUFreq Performance 121.2 466.4 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
asmFish 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes/second Per Watt, More Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K 259519.18 251626.25
ASKAP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.8 294.9 460.5 CPUFreq Performance 120.5 343.1 458.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 9 18 27 36 45 40.51 33.50
AI Benchmark Alpha CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 214.7 378.2 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 250.8 388.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
AI Benchmark Alpha Device AI Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device AI Score CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3 6 9 12 15 12.98 11.59
TNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 65.3 127.9 130.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 129.8 132.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
TNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 73.7 143.3 175.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.6 155.3 165.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Google SynthMark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.0 128.2 130.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.8 129.0 131.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Google SynthMark Test: VoiceMark_100 OpenBenchmarking.org Voices Per Watt, More Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.2533 2.5066 3.7599 5.0132 6.2665 5.57 5.54
RELION CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 119.68 / Avg: 480.3 / Max: 492.94 Min: 119.71 / Avg: 480.54 / Max: 494.18
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.6 123.6 132.8 CPUFreq Performance 119.7 124.2 136.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: SADD OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 13036.25 12966.74
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 124.5 132.3 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 124.9 134.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: LPUSH OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10016.27 9780.17
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 123.6 133.0 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 124.0 135.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: GET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 14375.86 13846.04
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 124.1 134.6 CPUFreq Performance 119.7 124.5 135.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: SET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 11683.85 11500.61
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 147.6 157.1 CPUFreq Performance 119.7 148.6 157.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
rav1e Speed: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 143.3 155.2 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 143.6 155.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
rav1e Speed: 5 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 74.9 142.0 151.6 CPUFreq Performance 74.7 143.0 152.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
rav1e Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 136.5 145.8 CPUFreq Performance 119.9 138.6 146.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
rav1e Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0045 0.009 0.0135 0.018 0.0225 0.02 0.02
QuantLib CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.3 130.8 133.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 132.0 134.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
QuantLib OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 16.49 16.34
QMCPACK CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 437.6 491.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.6 438.1 491.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Quantum ESPRESSO CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 120.56 / Avg: 385.69 / Max: 492.5 Min: 70.27 / Avg: 389.94 / Max: 492.33
OpenFOAM CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.1 290.0 399.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 290.6 400.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
OpenFOAM CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.2 309.5 472.2 CPUFreq Performance 120.9 309.6 472.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 50 100 150 200 250 Min: 121.3 / Avg: 270.44 / Max: 293.8 Min: 121.22 / Avg: 275.85 / Max: 301.54
ONNX Runtime Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 15.49 15.26
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 121.3 263.5 278.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 121.1 263.9 279.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
ONNX Runtime Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.1575 0.315 0.4725 0.63 0.7875 0.70 0.69
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 328.7 407.9 CPUFreq Performance 121.1 329.7 405.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: LU.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 100 200 300 400 500 469.62 466.44
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.4 375.8 430.9 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 377.2 446.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.D OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 10.29 10.24
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.8 216.2 410.0 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 218.1 411.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 17.84 17.62
LULESH CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 244.8 342.9 CPUFreq Performance 121.7 245.4 341.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
LULESH OpenBenchmarking.org z/s Per Watt, More Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20 40 60 80 100 80.77 78.80
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.0 427.6 439.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 428.6 441.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: 20k Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0135 0.027 0.0405 0.054 0.0675 0.06 0.06
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 120.5 176.0 401.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 176.6 409.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: Rhodopsin Protein OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.0315 0.063 0.0945 0.126 0.1575 0.14 0.13
IOR CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 209.5 223.9 CPUFreq Performance 120.4 211.4 225.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better IOR 3.3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
IOR Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.5738 1.1476 1.7214 2.2952 2.869 2.55 2.49
IOR CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 195.2 214.2 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 196.2 215.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better IOR 3.3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
IOR Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.594 1.188 1.782 2.376 2.97 2.64 2.43
GnuPG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 129.3 132.4 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 129.8 131.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GnuPG 2.2.27 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Gcrypt Library CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 63.3 127.6 131.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 129.2 133.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Gcrypt Library 1.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
FinanceBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 168.6 185.1 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 169.8 186.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
FinanceBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 171.0 184.5 CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 171.1 185.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Etcpak CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.9 127.4 128.6 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 128.7 130.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Etcpak Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s Per Watt, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.2745 0.549 0.8235 1.098 1.3725 1.22 1.21
Etcpak CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.8 127.0 129.7 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.6 128.2 130.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s Per Watt, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.4343 0.8686 1.3029 1.7372 2.1715 1.93 1.91
Etcpak CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 119.7 126.8 129.3 CPUFreq Schedutil 119.5 127.5 129.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s Per Watt, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.4748 0.9496 1.4244 1.8992 2.374 2.11 2.10
dav1d CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 144.8 190.2 CPUFreq Performance 119.6 150.2 248.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.2723 0.5446 0.8169 1.0892 1.3615 1.21 0.92
dav1d CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 184.4 344.4 CPUFreq Performance 119.9 197.5 386.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.414 0.828 1.242 1.656 2.07 1.84 1.72
Cython Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 129.5 131.5 CPUFreq Performance 120.3 130.1 133.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 127.4 169.1 CPUFreq Performance 120.6 147.5 245.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 1315.46 1091.62
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 125.6 144.4 CPUFreq Performance 72.0 144.2 193.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Skeincoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3625.65 2897.78
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 75.9 166.1 473.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.5 171.8 441.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Garlicoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 13 26 39 52 65 59.91 57.99
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 253.8 480.5 CPUFreq Performance 120.5 254.4 424.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: x25x OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2 4 6 8 10 6.08 6.04
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 125.9 138.6 CPUFreq Performance 120.9 145.0 174.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 2898.85 2358.08
Timed LLVM Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 64.9 318.0 492.4 CPUFreq Performance 121.1 322.9 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 284.2 492.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.3 290.5 492.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 159.2 492.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.7 167.0 492.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 276.3 492.2 CPUFreq Performance 99.7 278.9 492.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Performance 77.8 309.8 419.8 CPUFreq Schedutil 76.7 312.8 412.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit Per Watt, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1000K 2000K 3000K 4000K 5000K 4634187.41 4631994.74
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4