AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 - Perf Governor 2 x AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core testing looking at CPU freq invariance on 5.11 with patch. CPU power consumption monitoring via AMD_Energy interface at 1 second polling. Additional data with CPUFreq performance governor included.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2101273-SYST-210125309 .
AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 - Perf Governor Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver Compiler File-System Screen Resolution CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2 x AMD EPYC 7F72 24-Core @ 3.20GHz (48 Cores / 96 Threads) Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS) AMD Starship/Matisse 16 x 8192 MB DDR4-3200MT/s HMA81GR7CJR8N-XN 1000GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 1TB ASPEED VE228 2 x Intel 10G X550T Ubuntu 20.10 5.11.0-rc4-max-boost-inv-patch (x86_64) 20210121 GNOME Shell 3.38.1 X Server 1.20.9 modesetting 1.20.9 GCC 10.2.0 ext4 1920x1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-10-JvwpWM/gcc-10-10.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-10-JvwpWM/gcc-10-10.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v Disk Details - NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096 Processor Details - CPUFreq Schedutil: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x8301034 - CPUFreq Performance: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x8301034 Java Details - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.9.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.10) Python Details - Python 3.8.6 Security Details - itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 - Perf Governor amg: build-godot: Time To Compile build-gdb: Time To Compile build-linux-kernel: Time To Compile build-llvm: Time To Compile cpuminer-opt: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite cpuminer-opt: x25x cpuminer-opt: Garlicoin cpuminer-opt: Skeincoin cpuminer-opt: LBC, LBRY Credits cython-bench: N-Queens dav1d: Summer Nature 4K dav1d: Chimera 1080p 10-bit etcpak: ETC1 etcpak: ETC1 + Dithering etcpak: ETC2 financebench: Bonds OpenMP financebench: Repo OpenMP gcrypt: gnupg: 2.7GB Sample File Encryption ior: 2MB - Default Test Directory ior: 8MB - Default Test Directory lammps: Rhodopsin Protein lammps: 20k Atoms lulesh: npb: EP.C npb: EP.D npb: LU.C onnx: yolov4 - OpenMP CPU onnx: super-resolution-10 - OpenMP CPU openfoam: Motorbike 30M openfoam: Motorbike 60M qe: AUSURF112 qmcpack: simple-H2O quantlib: rav1e: 10 rav1e: 6 rav1e: 5 rav1e: 1 redis: SET redis: GET redis: LPUSH redis: SADD relion: Basic - CPU synthmark: VoiceMark_100 tnn: CPU - MobileNet v2 tnn: CPU - SqueezeNet v1.1 ai-benchmark: Device Inference Score ai-benchmark: Device Training Score ai-benchmark: Device AI Score askap: tConvolve MPI - Gridding askap: tConvolve MPI - Degridding asmfish: 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth astcenc: Thorough astcenc: Exhaustive blender: Barbershop - CPU-Only blogbench: Read brl-cad: VGR Performance Metric build2: Time To Compile byte: Dhrystone 2 compress-zstd: 3 compress-lz4: 1 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 1 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Decompression Speed dacapobench: H2 dacapobench: Jython dacapobench: Tradebeans dacapobench: Tradesoap dolfyn: Computational Fluid Dynamics ospray: Magnetic Reconnection - SciVis ospray: Magnetic Reconnection - Path Tracer ospray: XFrog Forest - SciVis ospray: XFrog Forest - Path Tracer ospray: NASA Streamlines - SciVis ospray: NASA Streamlines - Path Tracer ospray: San Miguel - SciVis ospray: San Miguel - Path Tracer povray: Trace Time yafaray: Total Time For Sample Scene ffte: N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine fftw: Float + SSE - 2D FFT Size 4096 clomp: Static OMP Speedup gpaw: Carbon Nanotube gromacs: Water Benchmark namd: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms himeno: Poisson Pressure Solver hint: FLOAT hpcg: john-the-ripper: MD5 john-the-ripper: Blowfish keydb: influxdb: 4 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 influxdb: 64 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 lczero: BLAS lczero: Eigen luxcorerender: DLSC luxcorerender: Rainbow Colors and Prism onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - f32 - CPU onednn: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - f32 - CPU onednn: IP Shapes 1D - f32 - CPU onednn: IP Shapes 3D - f32 - CPU onednn: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - f32 - CPU mrbayes: Primate Phylogeny Analysis neat: numpy: oidn: Memorial plaidml: No - Inference - ResNet 50 - CPU plaidml: No - Inference - VGG16 - CPU plaidml: No - Inference - VGG19 - CPU primesieve: 1e12 Prime Number Generation ttsiod-renderer: Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping rodinia: OpenMP CFD Solver rodinia: OpenMP LavaMD rodinia: OpenMP Leukocyte rodinia: OpenMP Streamcluster rodinia: OpenMP HotSpot3D simdjson: PartialTweets simdjson: LargeRand simdjson: Kostya simdjson: DistinctUserID sqlite-speedtest: Timed Time - Size 1,000 stockfish: Total Time svt-av1: Enc Mode 8 - 1080p svt-av1: Enc Mode 4 - 1080p svt-av1: Enc Mode 0 - 1080p svt-vp9: Visual Quality Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p svt-vp9: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p svt-vp9: VMAF Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p swet: Average tachyon: Total Time tensorflow-lite: Mobilenet Float tensorflow-lite: Mobilenet Quant tensorflow-lite: NASNet Mobile tensorflow-lite: SqueezeNet tensorflow-lite: Inception ResNet V2 tensorflow-lite: Inception V4 tscp: AI Chess Performance tungsten: Hair tungsten: Water Caustic tungsten: Volumetric Caustic v-ray: CPU x265: Bosphorus 1080p x265: Bosphorus 4K CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1448718333 59.177 92.916 25.752 208.786 296995 1541.76 9949.88 364017 139037 26.604 317.45 133.37 267.587 245.595 155.798 56769.453125 39406.757812 232.542 77.179 475.25 520.72 23.787 25.077 19771.223 3841.48 3863.45 154376.76 181 4210 18.30 128.28 1171.03 29.281 2157.2 3.054 1.408 1.068 0.372 1427348.10 1711621.52 1217218.75 1611164.34 348.294 714.914 289.764 274.869 1720 1067 2787 7453.51 11944.2 117632955 5.65 40.97 156.83 1103118 636521 67.322 38319339.8 8270.5 9757.17 11305.0 48.95 10666.0 47.76 10489.8 5217 4778 5591 5148 18.652 32.62 250 11.19 5.95 71.43 16.39 54.97 4.32 11.305 87.143 178738.12497094 17015 47.8 59.851 5.261 0.44472 4286.628309 323144417.17197 30.8262 4612308 72636 294214.37 812193.6 1256112.1 4061 4433 7.80 8.76 0.863782 2.33290 1.55447 0.849248 0.521968 1123.32 82.042 24.633 323.00 28.39 4.63 25.42 22.49 4.535 655.225 8.882 52.092 52.684 10.338 96.603 0.63 0.36 0.57 0.65 70.540 97042601 68.231 7.648 0.091 323.81 371.48 364.81 687480262 18.0565 39523.5 41034.0 134044 62195.4 736285 810750 1114562 6.69036 21.3329 5.26235 53460 49.45 19.74 1444174667 58.746 85.277 25.414 208.043 420231 1537.52 9964.35 522948 194087 26.895 363.33 181.95 267.136 245.453 155.783 56094.488281 39948.356771 232.760 77.022 517.33 539.63 24.639 25.116 19334.862 3857.33 3867.30 153770.57 185 4190 18.29 128.81 1249.06 28.971 2156.3 3.177 1.446 1.095 0.375 1454741.42 1782755.97 1251006.00 1610484.50 348.338 714.181 297.132 274.097 1775 1133 2908 7441.95 11492.9 117370871 5.67 41.07 158.07 1086347 635725 67.334 38656226.3 7770.3 9651.61 11150.6 49.29 10410.3 48.02 10555.1 4570 4740 4671 4621 18.635 32.80 333.33 11.19 5.95 71.43 16.39 55.56 4.33 11.427 87.331 180037.95358586 17335 47.4 59.757 5.255 0.44469 4135.519154 322775283.80125 30.9260 4762000 71757 303171.33 956189.4 1360163.0 4147 4450 7.89 8.76 0.867545 2.30467 1.57963 0.813628 0.514604 1247.48 82.261 25.037 324.48 28.33 4.66 25.22 22.43 4.489 665.448 8.510 52.360 51.290 10.432 96.885 0.63 0.37 0.57 0.65 69.883 96082114 68.465 7.488 0.091 309.61 363.18 346.71 686132109 18.2004 39981.9 41180.1 132844 61347.2 737993 818887 1116255 6.69505 21.4652 5.31183 55014 62.29 20.75 OpenBenchmarking.org
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300M 600M 900M 1200M 1500M SE +/- 750486.58, N = 3 SE +/- 4018322.42, N = 3 1448718333 1444174667 1. (CC) gcc options: -lparcsr_ls -lparcsr_mv -lseq_mv -lIJ_mv -lkrylov -lHYPRE_utilities -lm -fopenmp -pthread -lmpi
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit Per Watt, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1000K 2000K 3000K 4000K 5000K 4631994.74 4634187.41
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 76.7 312.8 412.3 CPUFreq Performance 77.8 309.8 419.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 59.18 58.75
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 276.3 492.2 CPUFreq Performance 99.7 278.9 492.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 Time To Compile CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 92.92 85.28
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 159.2 492.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.7 167.0 492.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.20, N = 9 SE +/- 0.19, N = 10 25.75 25.41
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 284.2 492.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.3 290.5 492.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Timed LLVM Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.79, N = 3 SE +/- 2.78, N = 3 208.79 208.04
Timed LLVM Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 64.9 318.0 492.4 CPUFreq Performance 121.1 322.9 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 5314.19, N = 12 SE +/- 19086.02, N = 12 296995 420231 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 2358.08 2898.85
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 125.9 138.6 CPUFreq Performance 120.9 145.0 174.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: x25x OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 17.73, N = 15 SE +/- 11.04, N = 12 1541.76 1537.52 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: x25x OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2 4 6 8 10 6.08 6.04
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 253.8 480.5 CPUFreq Performance 120.5 254.4 424.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Garlicoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 99.38, N = 15 SE +/- 155.17, N = 14 9949.88 9964.35 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Garlicoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 13 26 39 52 65 59.91 57.99
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 75.9 166.1 473.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.5 171.8 441.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Skeincoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 110K 220K 330K 440K 550K SE +/- 5604.68, N = 12 SE +/- 9614.65, N = 12 364017 522948 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Skeincoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 2897.78 3625.65
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 125.6 144.4 CPUFreq Performance 72.0 144.2 193.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 1380.06, N = 3 SE +/- 861.90, N = 3 139037 194087 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300 600 900 1200 1500 1091.62 1315.46
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 127.4 169.1 CPUFreq Performance 120.6 147.5 245.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Cython Benchmark Test: N-Queens OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 26.60 26.90
Cython Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 129.5 131.5 CPUFreq Performance 120.3 130.1 133.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 SE +/- 3.54, N = 15 317.45 363.33 MIN: 173.69 / MAX: 340.43 MIN: 186.32 / MAX: 403.05 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.414 0.828 1.242 1.656 2.07 1.72 1.84
dav1d CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 184.4 344.4 CPUFreq Performance 119.9 197.5 386.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 133.37 181.95 MIN: 92.59 / MAX: 205.11 MIN: 125.32 / MAX: 275.36 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
dav1d Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.2723 0.5446 0.8169 1.0892 1.3615 0.92 1.21
dav1d CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 144.8 190.2 CPUFreq Performance 119.6 150.2 248.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.8.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 267.59 267.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s Per Watt, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.4748 0.9496 1.4244 1.8992 2.374 2.10 2.11
Etcpak CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.5 127.5 129.7 CPUFreq Performance 119.7 126.8 129.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 245.60 245.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s Per Watt, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.4343 0.8686 1.3029 1.7372 2.1715 1.91 1.93
Etcpak CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.6 128.2 130.3 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 127.0 129.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Etcpak Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 155.80 155.78 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -lpthread
Etcpak Configuration: ETC2 OpenBenchmarking.org Mpx/s Per Watt, More Is Better Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.2745 0.549 0.8235 1.098 1.3725 1.21 1.22
Etcpak CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 128.7 130.1 CPUFreq Performance 119.9 127.4 128.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Etcpak 0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
FinanceBench Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 598.50, N = 3 SE +/- 365.12, N = 3 56769.45 56094.49 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
FinanceBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 171.1 185.9 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 171.0 184.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
FinanceBench Benchmark: Repo OpenMP OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 393.10, N = 3 SE +/- 456.10, N = 3 39406.76 39948.36 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
FinanceBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 169.8 186.4 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 168.6 185.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FinanceBench 2016-07-25 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Gcrypt Library OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Gcrypt Library 1.9 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.81, N = 3 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 232.54 232.76 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -fvisibility=hidden -lgpg-error
Gcrypt Library CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 129.2 133.1 CPUFreq Performance 63.3 127.6 131.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Gcrypt Library 1.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
GnuPG 2.7GB Sample File Encryption OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 77.18 77.02 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2
GnuPG CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 129.8 131.4 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 129.3 132.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GnuPG 2.2.27 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
IOR Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 2.06, N = 3 SE +/- 5.48, N = 3 475.25 517.33 MIN: 400.96 / MAX: 971.55 MIN: 463.44 / MAX: 1007.52 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -pthread -lmpi
IOR Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.594 1.188 1.782 2.376 2.97 2.43 2.64
IOR CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 195.2 214.2 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 196.2 215.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better IOR 3.3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
IOR Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 2.63, N = 3 SE +/- 5.78, N = 3 520.72 539.63 MIN: 176.53 / MAX: 1089.46 MIN: 280.44 / MAX: 1002.78 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -pthread -lmpi
IOR Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.5738 1.1476 1.7214 2.2952 2.869 2.49 2.55
IOR CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 209.5 223.9 CPUFreq Performance 120.4 211.4 225.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better IOR 3.3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: Rhodopsin Protein OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.17, N = 12 SE +/- 0.19, N = 15 23.79 24.64 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lm
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: Rhodopsin Protein OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0315 0.063 0.0945 0.126 0.1575 0.13 0.14
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 176.6 409.0 CPUFreq Performance 120.5 176.0 401.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: 20k Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 25.08 25.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lm
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: 20k Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0135 0.027 0.0405 0.054 0.0675 0.06 0.06
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 428.6 441.7 CPUFreq Performance 120.0 427.6 439.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
LULESH OpenBenchmarking.org z/s, More Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 171.84, N = 5 SE +/- 182.76, N = 5 19771.22 19334.86 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp -lm -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
LULESH OpenBenchmarking.org z/s Per Watt, More Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20 40 60 80 100 80.77 78.80
LULESH CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 244.8 342.9 CPUFreq Performance 121.7 245.4 341.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 5.01, N = 10 SE +/- 4.01, N = 10 3841.48 3857.33 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz 2. Open MPI 4.0.3
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 4 8 12 16 20 17.62 17.84
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 218.1 411.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.8 216.2 410.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.D OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 2.97, N = 3 SE +/- 2.74, N = 3 3863.45 3867.30 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz 2. Open MPI 4.0.3
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.D OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3 6 9 12 15 10.24 10.29
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 377.2 446.9 CPUFreq Performance 120.4 375.8 430.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: LU.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 509.59, N = 4 SE +/- 121.33, N = 4 154376.76 153770.57 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz 2. Open MPI 4.0.3
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: LU.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 100 200 300 400 500 469.62 466.44
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 328.7 407.9 CPUFreq Performance 121.1 329.7 405.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
ONNX Runtime Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 SE +/- 2.62, N = 3 181 185 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -ldl -lrt
ONNX Runtime Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.1575 0.315 0.4725 0.63 0.7875 0.69 0.70
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.1 263.9 279.9 CPUFreq Performance 121.3 263.5 278.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
ONNX Runtime Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 44.10, N = 3 SE +/- 68.07, N = 12 4210 4190 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -ldl -lrt
ONNX Runtime Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 4 8 12 16 20 15.26 15.49
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.2 275.8 301.5 CPUFreq Performance 121.3 270.4 293.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
OpenFOAM Input: Motorbike 30M OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 18.30 18.29 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -m64 -O3 -ftemplate-depth-100 -fPIC -fuse-ld=bfd -Xlinker --add-needed --no-as-needed -lfoamToVTK -ldynamicMesh -llagrangian -lgenericPatchFields -lfileFormats -lOpenFOAM -ldl -lm
OpenFOAM CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.2 309.5 472.2 CPUFreq Performance 120.9 309.6 472.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
OpenFOAM Input: Motorbike 60M OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 60M CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 128.28 128.81 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -m64 -O3 -ftemplate-depth-100 -fPIC -fuse-ld=bfd -Xlinker --add-needed --no-as-needed -lfoamToVTK -ldynamicMesh -llagrangian -lgenericPatchFields -lfileFormats -lOpenFOAM -ldl -lm
OpenFOAM CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 290.6 400.9 CPUFreq Performance 121.1 290.0 399.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
Quantum ESPRESSO Input: AUSURF112 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 Input: AUSURF112 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 12.21, N = 4 SE +/- 19.05, N = 9 1171.03 1249.06 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -lopenblas -lFoX_dom -lFoX_sax -lFoX_wxml -lFoX_common -lFoX_utils -lFoX_fsys -lfftw3 -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -ldl -levent -levent_pthreads -lutil -lm -lrt -lz
Quantum ESPRESSO CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 120.56 / Avg: 385.69 / Max: 492.5 Min: 70.27 / Avg: 389.94 / Max: 492.33
QMCPACK Input: simple-H2O OpenBenchmarking.org Total Execution Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 29.28 28.97 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -finline-limit=1000 -fstrict-aliasing -funroll-all-loops -march=native -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -pthread -lm
QMCPACK CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 437.6 491.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.6 438.1 491.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better QMCPACK 3.10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
QuantLib OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 8.27, N = 3 SE +/- 16.02, N = 3 2157.2 2156.3 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic
QuantLib OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 4 8 12 16 20 16.34 16.49
QuantLib CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 132.0 134.5 CPUFreq Performance 120.3 130.8 133.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
rav1e Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.7148 1.4296 2.1444 2.8592 3.574 SE +/- 0.008, N = 3 SE +/- 0.018, N = 3 3.054 3.177
rav1e Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0045 0.009 0.0135 0.018 0.0225 0.02 0.02
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 136.5 145.8 CPUFreq Performance 119.9 138.6 146.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
rav1e Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.3254 0.6508 0.9762 1.3016 1.627 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 1.408 1.446
rav1e Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 74.9 142.0 151.6 CPUFreq Performance 74.7 143.0 152.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
rav1e Speed: 5 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.2464 0.4928 0.7392 0.9856 1.232 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 1.068 1.095
rav1e Speed: 5 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 143.3 155.2 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 143.6 155.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
rav1e Speed: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0844 0.1688 0.2532 0.3376 0.422 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.372 0.375
rav1e Speed: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance
rav1e CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 147.6 157.1 CPUFreq Performance 119.7 148.6 157.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better rav1e 0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: SET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 13176.39, N = 15 SE +/- 10017.79, N = 13 1427348.10 1454741.42 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
Redis Test: SET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 11500.61 11683.85
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 124.1 134.6 CPUFreq Performance 119.7 124.5 135.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: GET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 12716.89, N = 11 SE +/- 32510.57, N = 12 1711621.52 1782755.97 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
Redis Test: GET OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 13846.04 14375.86
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 123.6 133.0 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 124.0 135.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: LPUSH OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 13782.67, N = 3 SE +/- 11397.44, N = 3 1217218.75 1251006.00 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
Redis Test: LPUSH OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 9780.17 10016.27
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 124.5 132.3 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 124.9 134.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Redis Test: SADD OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 15585.71, N = 4 SE +/- 17675.25, N = 15 1611164.34 1610484.50 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
Redis Test: SADD OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 13036.25 12966.74
Redis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.6 123.6 132.8 CPUFreq Performance 119.7 124.2 136.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Redis 6.0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
RELION Test: Basic - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 Test: Basic - Device: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 2.97, N = 9 SE +/- 3.10, N = 9 348.29 348.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -std=c++0x -O3 -rdynamic -ldl -ltiff -lfftw3f -lfftw3 -lpng -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
RELION CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 119.68 / Avg: 480.3 / Max: 492.94 Min: 119.71 / Avg: 480.54 / Max: 494.18
Google SynthMark Test: VoiceMark_100 OpenBenchmarking.org Voices, More Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 1.18, N = 3 714.91 714.18 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -std=c++11 -Ofast
Google SynthMark Test: VoiceMark_100 OpenBenchmarking.org Voices Per Watt, More Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1.2533 2.5066 3.7599 5.0132 6.2665 5.54 5.57
Google SynthMark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.8 129.0 131.4 CPUFreq Performance 121.0 128.2 130.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
TNN Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 2.83, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 289.76 297.13 MIN: 283.65 / MAX: 458.79 MIN: 295.49 / MAX: 320.4 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -rdynamic -ldl
TNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 73.7 143.3 175.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.6 155.3 165.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
TNN Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 274.87 274.10 MIN: 273.07 / MAX: 276.74 MIN: 273.16 / MAX: 274.86 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -rdynamic -ldl
TNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 129.8 132.8 CPUFreq Performance 65.3 127.9 130.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
AI Benchmark Alpha Device Inference Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Inference Score CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1720 1775
AI Benchmark Alpha Device Training Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Training Score CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 200 400 600 800 1000 1067 1133
AI Benchmark Alpha Device AI Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device AI Score CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 2787 2908
AI Benchmark Alpha Device AI Score OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device AI Score CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3 6 9 12 15 12.98 11.59
AI Benchmark Alpha CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 214.7 378.2 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 250.8 388.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second, More Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 2.90, N = 3 SE +/- 7.65, N = 3 7453.51 7441.95 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second, More Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 6.47, N = 3 SE +/- 137.09, N = 3 11944.2 11492.9 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 9 18 27 36 45 40.51 33.50
ASKAP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.8 294.9 460.5 CPUFreq Performance 120.5 343.1 458.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASKAP 2018-11-10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
asmFish 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes/second, More Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 30M 60M 90M 120M 150M SE +/- 358515.89, N = 3 SE +/- 1411556.16, N = 4 117632955 117370871
asmFish 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes/second Per Watt, More Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K 259519.18 251626.25
asmFish CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 453.3 491.9 CPUFreq Performance 121.2 466.4 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
ASTC Encoder Preset: Thorough OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Thorough CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1.2758 2.5516 3.8274 5.1032 6.379 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 SE +/- 0.01, N = 5 5.65 5.67 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++14 -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -flto -mfpmath=sse -mavx2 -mpopcnt -lpthread
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 217.2 492.0 CPUFreq Performance 121.3 247.5 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
ASTC Encoder Preset: Exhaustive OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Exhaustive CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 40.97 41.07 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++14 -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -flto -mfpmath=sse -mavx2 -mpopcnt -lpthread
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 383.9 492.0 CPUFreq Performance 120.8 417.1 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Blender Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.90 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.95, N = 3 156.83 158.07
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 423.5 492.3 CPUFreq Performance 121.2 434.6 494.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.90 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1738.41, N = 3 SE +/- 13508.02, N = 3 1103118 1086347 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score Per Watt, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 4752.60 4638.96
BlogBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 232.1 341.5 CPUFreq Performance 120.8 234.2 328.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better BlogBench 1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
BRL-CAD VGR Performance Metric OpenBenchmarking.org VGR Performance Metric, More Is Better BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K 636521 635725 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fexceptions -ftemplate-depth-128 -m64 -ggdb3 -O3 -fipa-pta -fstrength-reduce -finline-functions -flto -pedantic -rdynamic -lSM -lICE -lXi -lGLU -lGL -lGLdispatch -lX11 -lXext -lXrender -lpthread -ldl -luuid -lm
BRL-CAD VGR Performance Metric OpenBenchmarking.org VGR Performance Metric Per Watt, More Is Better BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300 600 900 1200 1500 1369.51 1355.13
BRL-CAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 464.8 492.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.4 469.1 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better BRL-CAD 7.30.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Build2 Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.13 Time To Compile CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 67.32 67.33
Build2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 244.2 493.2 CPUFreq Performance 120.9 256.5 506.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
BYTE Unix Benchmark Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 OpenBenchmarking.org LPS, More Is Better BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 8M 16M 24M 32M 40M SE +/- 341040.65, N = 3 SE +/- 498492.56, N = 3 38319339.8 38656226.3
BYTE Unix Benchmark Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 OpenBenchmarking.org LPS Per Watt, More Is Better BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 70K 140K 210K 280K 350K 306193.49 307169.01
BYTE Unix Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 125.1 132.4 CPUFreq Performance 120.0 125.8 133.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 69.07, N = 3 SE +/- 648.67, N = 12 8270.5 7770.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 12 24 36 48 60 54.88 50.56
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 150.7 214.6 CPUFreq Performance 120.0 153.7 222.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 19.43, N = 3 SE +/- 71.91, N = 3 9757.17 9651.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 25.21, N = 3 SE +/- 110.98, N = 3 11305.0 11150.6 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20 40 60 80 100 81.34 81.46
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 139.0 145.1 CPUFreq Performance 71.1 136.9 143.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 5 48.95 49.29 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 60.61, N = 3 SE +/- 61.51, N = 5 10666.0 10410.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20 40 60 80 100 80.07 79.05
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 133.2 144.5 CPUFreq Performance 119.7 131.7 143.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 47.76 48.02 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 31.24, N = 3 SE +/- 96.09, N = 3 10489.8 10555.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20 40 60 80 100 78.46 80.12
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 133.7 144.7 CPUFreq Performance 119.7 131.7 143.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: H2 OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 73.65, N = 20 SE +/- 70.06, N = 20 5217 4570
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 60.6 134.4 163.7 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 139.4 180.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Jython OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 43.93, N = 6 SE +/- 20.83, N = 6 4778 4740
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 137.8 195.6 CPUFreq Performance 119.9 138.2 194.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradebeans OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 66.39, N = 20 SE +/- 52.34, N = 20 5591 4671
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 140.5 200.9 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 149.7 216.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Tradesoap OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 61.21, N = 4 SE +/- 42.72, N = 5 5148 4621
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 165.5 309.0 CPUFreq Performance 120.2 171.7 314.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Dolfyn Computational Fluid Dynamics OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.65 18.64
Dolfyn CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 130.2 133.2 CPUFreq Performance 119.9 129.9 132.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Dolfyn 0.527 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.23, N = 6 SE +/- 0.24, N = 6 32.62 32.80 MIN: 12.82 / MAX: 33.33 MIN: 13.16 / MAX: 34.48
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0248 0.0496 0.0744 0.0992 0.124 0.11 0.10
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.6 309.6 449.8 CPUFreq Performance 119.7 314.6 450.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.00, N = 11 250.00 333.33 MIN: 90.91 / MAX: 333.33 MIN: 100 / MAX: 500
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.4478 0.8956 1.3434 1.7912 2.239 1.65 1.99
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 151.8 245.9 CPUFreq Performance 120.4 167.3 303.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 11.19 11.19 MIN: 8.2 / MAX: 11.36 MIN: 7.87 / MAX: 11.36
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0068 0.0136 0.0204 0.0272 0.034 0.03 0.03
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.0 379.8 489.7 CPUFreq Performance 120.1 378.9 489.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1.3388 2.6776 4.0164 5.3552 6.694 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 5.95 5.95 MIN: 5.35 / MAX: 6.02 MIN: 5.46 / MAX: 6.02
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 420.8 490.6 CPUFreq Performance 120.9 421.1 490.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.00, N = 7 SE +/- 0.00, N = 7 71.43 71.43 MIN: 19.61 / MAX: 76.92 MIN: 19.61 / MAX: 76.92
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0675 0.135 0.2025 0.27 0.3375 0.30 0.30
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.4 238.8 480.3 CPUFreq Performance 121.3 241.6 481.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 16.39 16.39 MIN: 10.99 / MAX: 16.95 MIN: 10.31 / MAX: 16.95
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0113 0.0226 0.0339 0.0452 0.0565 0.05 0.05
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 361.1 488.0 CPUFreq Performance 120.7 362.0 487.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.58, N = 5 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 54.97 55.56 MIN: 31.25 / MAX: 58.82 MIN: 33.33 / MAX: 58.82
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0743 0.1486 0.2229 0.2972 0.3715 0.32 0.33
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 171.8 482.2 CPUFreq Performance 120.6 168.2 482.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.9743 1.9486 2.9229 3.8972 4.8715 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.32 4.33 MIN: 3.76 / MAX: 4.37 MIN: 3.65 / MAX: 4.37
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 341.0 480.2 CPUFreq Performance 120.1 343.6 488.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
POV-Ray Trace Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.05, N = 4 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 11.31 11.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -pthread -lSDL -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lIlmImf -lIlmImf-2_5 -lImath-2_5 -lHalf-2_5 -lIex-2_5 -lIexMath-2_5 -lIlmThread-2_5 -lIlmThread -ltiff -ljpeg -lpng -lz -lrt -lm -lboost_thread -lboost_system
POV-Ray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 329.6 492.1 CPUFreq Performance 121.6 327.6 492.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
YafaRay Total Time For Sample Scene OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better YafaRay 3.4.1 Total Time For Sample Scene CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.85, N = 15 SE +/- 0.69, N = 15 87.14 87.33 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -O3 -ffast-math -rdynamic -ldl -lImath -lIlmImf -lIex -lHalf -lz -lIlmThread -lxml2 -lfreetype -lpthread
YafaRay CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better YafaRay 3.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 77.37 / Avg: 312.46 / Max: 377.49 Min: 120.76 / Avg: 313.28 / Max: 374.38
FFTE N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 1760.31, N = 15 SE +/- 1616.93, N = 15 178738.12 180037.95 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fopenmp
FFTE N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 140 280 420 560 700 656.40 664.85
FFTE CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.3 272.3 488.9 CPUFreq Performance 121.3 270.8 488.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFTE 7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 213.45, N = 3 SE +/- 199.64, N = 9 17015 17335 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -mtune=native -malign-double -fstrict-aliasing -fno-schedule-insns -ffast-math -lm
FFTW Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops Per Watt, More Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 30 60 90 120 150 127.83 131.21
FFTW CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 133.1 142.8 CPUFreq Performance 65.2 132.1 150.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FFTW 3.3.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
CLOMP Static OMP Speedup OpenBenchmarking.org Speedup, More Is Better CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 47.8 47.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -lm
CLOMP Static OMP Speedup OpenBenchmarking.org Speedup Per Watt, More Is Better CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0698 0.1396 0.2094 0.2792 0.349 0.31 0.31
CLOMP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 152.6 321.5 CPUFreq Performance 119.9 151.3 312.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better CLOMP 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
GPAW Input: Carbon Nanotube OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GPAW 20.1 Input: Carbon Nanotube CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 59.85 59.76 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -shared -fwrapv -O2 -lxc -lblas -lmpi
GPAW CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 404.8 464.0 CPUFreq Performance 120.3 403.9 464.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GPAW 20.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
GROMACS Water Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day, More Is Better GROMACS 2020.3 Water Benchmark CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1.1837 2.3674 3.5511 4.7348 5.9185 SE +/- 0.022, N = 3 SE +/- 0.021, N = 3 5.261 5.255 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lrt -lpthread -lm
GROMACS Water Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day Per Watt, More Is Better GROMACS 2020.3 Water Benchmark CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
GROMACS CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.3 421.6 491.7 CPUFreq Performance 121.4 424.3 488.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GROMACS 2020.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
NAMD ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.1001 0.2002 0.3003 0.4004 0.5005 SE +/- 0.00005, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00075, N = 3 0.44472 0.44469
NAMD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 423.2 492.1 CPUFreq Performance 122.0 422.4 492.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 25.26, N = 3 SE +/- 27.09, N = 3 4286.63 4135.52 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -mavx2
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 7 14 21 28 35 31.94 31.13
Himeno Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 134.2 136.7 CPUFreq Performance 120.2 132.8 135.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Hierarchical INTegration Test: FLOAT OpenBenchmarking.org QUIPs, More Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 70M 140M 210M 280M 350M SE +/- 122621.60, N = 3 SE +/- 201175.83, N = 3 323144417.17 322775283.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lm
Hierarchical INTegration Test: FLOAT OpenBenchmarking.org QUIPs Per Watt, More Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 2496420.85 2527557.17
Hierarchical INTegration CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 64.8 129.4 131.6 CPUFreq Performance 64.2 127.7 129.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
High Performance Conjugate Gradient OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 30.83 30.93 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
High Performance Conjugate Gradient OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s Per Watt, More Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0203 0.0406 0.0609 0.0812 0.1015 0.08 0.09
High Performance Conjugate Gradient CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 363.8 391.8 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 363.8 399.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
John The Ripper Test: MD5 OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1000K 2000K 3000K 4000K 5000K SE +/- 54344.04, N = 13 SE +/- 7371.11, N = 3 4612308 4762000 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -pthread -lm -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2
John The Ripper Test: MD5 OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10084.88 10378.20
John The Ripper CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 122.0 457.3 492.3 CPUFreq Performance 122.4 458.8 492.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
John The Ripper Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K SE +/- 73.45, N = 3 SE +/- 507.10, N = 3 72636 71757 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -lgmp -pthread -lm -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2
John The Ripper Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S Per Watt, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 40 80 120 160 200 185.47 183.88
John The Ripper CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 391.6 433.0 CPUFreq Performance 122.1 390.2 430.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
KeyDB OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 3012.50, N = 15 SE +/- 5131.54, N = 15 294214.37 303171.33 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
KeyDB OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec Per Watt, More Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1865.16 1761.51
KeyDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 64.4 157.7 178.6 CPUFreq Performance 60.8 172.1 190.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1525.09, N = 3 SE +/- 2401.68, N = 3 812193.6 956189.4
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec Per Watt, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 4857.31 4963.60
InfluxDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 167.2 187.5 CPUFreq Performance 120.8 192.6 218.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 2545.78, N = 3 SE +/- 9433.94, N = 3 1256112.1 1360163.0
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec Per Watt, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 6672.14 6626.07
InfluxDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 188.3 217.2 CPUFreq Performance 120.9 205.3 232.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
LeelaChessZero Backend: BLAS OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: BLAS CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 49.90, N = 9 SE +/- 17.79, N = 3 4061 4147 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -pthread
LeelaChessZero Backend: BLAS OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: BLAS CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3 6 9 12 15 9.72 9.72
LeelaChessZero CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 120.35 / Avg: 417.68 / Max: 492.34 Min: 121.03 / Avg: 426.62 / Max: 492.36
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: Eigen CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 36.23, N = 3 SE +/- 26.71, N = 3 4433 4450 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -pthread
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: Eigen CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3 6 9 12 15 10.45 10.39
LeelaChessZero CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.4 424.2 492.4 CPUFreq Performance 121.9 428.4 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.26 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LuxCoreRender Scene: DLSC OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 7.80 7.89 MIN: 7.61 / MAX: 8.59 MIN: 7.67 / MAX: 8.57
LuxCoreRender Scene: DLSC OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0045 0.009 0.0135 0.018 0.0225 0.02 0.02
LuxCoreRender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 459.0 493.1 CPUFreq Performance 122.0 458.4 493.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LuxCoreRender Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 8.76 8.76 MIN: 8.31 / MAX: 8.97 MIN: 8.22 / MAX: 8.86
LuxCoreRender Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0045 0.009 0.0135 0.018 0.0225 0.02 0.02
LuxCoreRender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.7 461.8 493.2 CPUFreq Performance 122.2 461.6 493.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.1952 0.3904 0.5856 0.7808 0.976 SE +/- 0.001510, N = 7 SE +/- 0.001697, N = 7 0.863782 0.867545 MIN: 0.79 MIN: 0.78 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 331.1 492.0 CPUFreq Performance 121.8 332.1 492.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
oneDNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.5249 1.0498 1.5747 2.0996 2.6245 SE +/- 0.01587, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02560, N = 15 2.33290 2.30467 MIN: 2 MIN: 1.88 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.8 285.6 468.7 CPUFreq Performance 121.0 284.2 491.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.3554 0.7108 1.0662 1.4216 1.777 SE +/- 0.01340, N = 4 SE +/- 0.01359, N = 4 1.55447 1.57963 MIN: 1.29 MIN: 1.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 279.6 482.7 CPUFreq Performance 121.0 280.4 481.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
oneDNN Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.1911 0.3822 0.5733 0.7644 0.9555 SE +/- 0.004000, N = 5 SE +/- 0.005456, N = 5 0.849248 0.813628 MIN: 0.73 MIN: 0.69 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 235.0 415.0 CPUFreq Performance 121.1 239.4 430.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
oneDNN Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.1174 0.2348 0.3522 0.4696 0.587 SE +/- 0.004601, N = 4 SE +/- 0.005906, N = 4 0.521968 0.514604 MIN: 0.43 MIN: 0.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 274.8 455.7 CPUFreq Performance 120.7 278.8 480.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 3.00, N = 3 SE +/- 35.45, N = 15 1123.32 1247.48 MIN: 1077.56 MIN: 1069.01 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 341.5 492.2 CPUFreq Performance 120.8 339.2 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Timed MrBayes Analysis Primate Phylogeny Analysis OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 82.04 82.26 1. (CC) gcc options: -mmmx -msse -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -msha -maes -mavx -mfma -mavx2 -mrdrnd -mbmi -mbmi2 -madx -mabm -O3 -std=c99 -pedantic -lm
Timed MrBayes Analysis CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.9 467.9 492.0 CPUFreq Performance 121.2 465.5 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.56, N = 12 SE +/- 0.62, N = 14 24.63 25.04 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -ffree-line-length-0 -Jsource/ -fopenmp -O3 -fno-backtrace
Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 179.4 280.2 CPUFreq Performance 120.5 178.5 280.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Numpy Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 323.00 324.48
Numpy Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.5535 1.107 1.6605 2.214 2.7675 2.43 2.46
Numpy Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 133.2 142.0 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 131.7 141.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Intel Open Image Denoise Scene: Memorial OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.04, N = 6 SE +/- 0.17, N = 6 28.39 28.33
Intel Open Image Denoise Scene: Memorial OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 0.08 0.08
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 346.7 488.6 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 346.7 488.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1.0485 2.097 3.1455 4.194 5.2425 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 4.63 4.66
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0068 0.0136 0.0204 0.0272 0.034 0.03 0.03
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 77.57 / Avg: 156.39 / Max: 196.21 Min: 82.95 / Avg: 160.37 / Max: 200.84
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.30, N = 15 SE +/- 0.24, N = 15 25.42 25.22
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0203 0.0406 0.0609 0.0812 0.1015 0.09 0.09
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 60 120 180 240 300 Min: 120.47 / Avg: 284.69 / Max: 345.62 Min: 120.32 / Avg: 284.73 / Max: 343.46
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.16, N = 15 SE +/- 0.20, N = 15 22.49 22.43
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 0.08 0.08
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 120.81 / Avg: 287.74 / Max: 365.75 Min: 121.23 / Avg: 291.09 / Max: 365.95
Primesieve 1e12 Prime Number Generation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 7.4 1e12 Prime Number Generation CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1.0204 2.0408 3.0612 4.0816 5.102 SE +/- 0.015, N = 8 SE +/- 0.008, N = 8 4.535 4.489 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lpthread
Primesieve CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 309.6 492.0 CPUFreq Performance 121.3 310.0 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 7.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
TTSIOD 3D Renderer Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 3.22, N = 3 SE +/- 5.92, N = 15 655.23 665.45 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -mtune=native -flto -msse -mrecip -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -mssse3 -lSDL -fopenmp -fwhole-program -lstdc++
TTSIOD 3D Renderer Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.6165 1.233 1.8495 2.466 3.0825 2.70 2.74
TTSIOD 3D Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 242.4 266.3 CPUFreq Performance 121.0 243.0 271.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Rodinia Test: OpenMP CFD Solver OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.141, N = 15 SE +/- 0.053, N = 5 8.882 8.510 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 253.4 373.0 CPUFreq Performance 120.9 253.1 370.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Rodinia Test: OpenMP LavaMD OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 52.09 52.36 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 430.6 492.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.8 433.4 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Rodinia Test: OpenMP Leukocyte OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.69, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 52.68 51.29 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.0 281.6 334.8 CPUFreq Performance 121.4 285.4 336.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Rodinia Test: OpenMP Streamcluster OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 5 SE +/- 0.04, N = 5 10.34 10.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 215.0 284.6 CPUFreq Performance 120.7 216.9 281.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Rodinia Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.59, N = 3 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 96.60 96.89 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 157.6 257.7 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 156.2 253.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
simdjson Throughput Test: PartialTweets OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: PartialTweets CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.1418 0.2836 0.4254 0.5672 0.709 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.63 0.63 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
simdjson Throughput Test: PartialTweets OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: PartialTweets CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 128.6 130.0 CPUFreq Performance 119.4 128.3 129.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: LargeRandom OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: LargeRandom CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0833 0.1666 0.2499 0.3332 0.4165 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.36 0.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
simdjson Throughput Test: LargeRandom OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: LargeRandom CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 129.9 132.4 CPUFreq Performance 119.7 128.6 131.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: Kostya OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: Kostya CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.1283 0.2566 0.3849 0.5132 0.6415 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.57 0.57 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
simdjson Throughput Test: Kostya OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: Kostya CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 130.5 132.8 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 128.9 131.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: DistinctUserID OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.1463 0.2926 0.4389 0.5852 0.7315 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.65 0.65 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
simdjson Throughput Test: DistinctUserID OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 0.01
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.1 129.7 130.6 CPUFreq Performance 119.7 128.1 129.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.7.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
SQLite Speedtest Timed Time - Size 1,000 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 70.54 69.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lz -lpthread
SQLite Speedtest CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 131.3 133.3 CPUFreq Performance 119.8 129.6 131.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Stockfish Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Stockfish 12 Total Time CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 20M 40M 60M 80M 100M SE +/- 769788.53, N = 3 SE +/- 1344259.09, N = 3 97042601 96082114 1. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++17 -pedantic -O3 -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -msse4.1 -mssse3 -msse2 -flto -flto=jobserver
Stockfish Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Stockfish 12 Total Time CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K 220989.94 218753.45
Stockfish CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 60.1 439.1 492.3 CPUFreq Performance 119.9 439.2 492.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stockfish 12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 1.05, N = 15 SE +/- 0.65, N = 15 68.23 68.47 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0743 0.1486 0.2229 0.2972 0.3715 0.33 0.33
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.4 209.8 388.0 CPUFreq Performance 120.4 207.6 386.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.029, N = 4 SE +/- 0.031, N = 4 7.648 7.488 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0068 0.0136 0.0204 0.0272 0.034 0.03 0.03
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 229.6 530.7 CPUFreq Performance 120.0 227.7 514.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0205 0.041 0.0615 0.082 0.1025 SE +/- 0.001, N = 12 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.091 0.091 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 50 100 150 200 250 Min: 73.78 / Avg: 154.73 / Max: 305.59 Min: 119.66 / Avg: 152.88 / Max: 301.34
SVT-VP9 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 4.21, N = 15 SE +/- 15.29, N = 15 323.81 309.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
SVT-VP9 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.3915 0.783 1.1745 1.566 1.9575 1.74 1.68
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.4 185.8 379.1 CPUFreq Performance 119.5 184.0 372.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
SVT-VP9 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.70, N = 9 SE +/- 1.84, N = 9 371.48 363.18 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
SVT-VP9 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.4748 0.9496 1.4244 1.8992 2.374 2.11 2.07
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 176.2 363.1 CPUFreq Performance 119.7 175.3 361.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
SVT-VP9 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.91, N = 10 SE +/- 2.58, N = 15 364.81 346.71 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
SVT-VP9 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.468 0.936 1.404 1.872 2.34 2.08 1.97
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.8 175.7 360.6 CPUFreq Performance 119.9 175.7 352.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Swet Average OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second, More Is Better Swet 1.5.16 Average CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 150M 300M 450M 600M 750M SE +/- 1732499.41, N = 3 SE +/- 3454923.88, N = 3 687480262 686132109 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -lcurses -lrt
Swet Average OpenBenchmarking.org Operations Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Swet 1.5.16 Average CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1.2M 2.4M 3.6M 4.8M 6M 5408272.60 5450163.70
Swet CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.7 127.1 130.6 CPUFreq Performance 119.9 125.9 128.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Swet 1.5.16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Tachyon Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 18.06 18.20 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -ltachyon -lm -lpthread
Tachyon CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 119.9 402.8 492.0 CPUFreq Performance 120.0 397.8 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tachyon 0.99b6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
TensorFlow Lite Model: Mobilenet Float OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Float CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 395.37, N = 3 SE +/- 473.02, N = 3 39523.5 39981.9
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 451.2 480.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.8 451.8 481.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite Model: Mobilenet Quant OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Quant CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 400.94, N = 6 SE +/- 211.03, N = 3 41034.0 41180.1
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.2 453.6 483.1 CPUFreq Performance 121.6 453.0 481.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite Model: NASNet Mobile OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: NASNet Mobile CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 2393.85, N = 15 SE +/- 2146.20, N = 15 134044 132844
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 403.7 446.4 CPUFreq Performance 121.8 401.7 439.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite Model: SqueezeNet OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: SqueezeNet CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 13K 26K 39K 52K 65K SE +/- 412.91, N = 15 SE +/- 715.70, N = 4 62195.4 61347.2
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.4 449.5 481.2 CPUFreq Performance 121.9 451.3 481.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite Model: Inception ResNet V2 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception ResNet V2 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 5824.36, N = 9 SE +/- 2132.19, N = 3 736285 737993
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.6 442.7 471.4 CPUFreq Performance 121.8 439.4 470.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TensorFlow Lite Model: Inception V4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception V4 CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1163.43, N = 3 SE +/- 4685.69, N = 3 810750 818887
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.5 431.6 460.9 CPUFreq Performance 121.7 429.0 458.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
TSCP AI Chess Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 609.97, N = 12 SE +/- 517.61, N = 12 1114562 1116255 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
TSCP AI Chess Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 8992.52 9016.56
TSCP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.7 123.9 131.5 CPUFreq Performance 120.8 123.8 129.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TSCP 1.81 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Tungsten Renderer Scene: Hair OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Hair CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01480, N = 6 SE +/- 0.06150, N = 6 6.69036 6.69505 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -march=znver1 -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lIlmImf -lIlmThread -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lz -ljpeg -lpthread -ldl
Tungsten Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.5 291.2 492.0 CPUFreq Performance 120.7 289.5 492.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Tungsten Renderer Scene: Water Caustic OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Water Caustic CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.21, N = 15 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 21.33 21.47 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -march=znver1 -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lIlmImf -lIlmThread -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lz -ljpeg -lpthread -ldl
Tungsten Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 187.1 235.3 CPUFreq Performance 120.6 187.7 234.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Tungsten Renderer Scene: Volumetric Caustic OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Volumetric Caustic CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 1.1952 2.3904 3.5856 4.7808 5.976 SE +/- 0.03676, N = 7 SE +/- 0.03612, N = 13 5.26235 5.31183 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -march=znver1 -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -msse4a -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lIlmImf -lIlmThread -lImath -lHalf -lIex -lz -ljpeg -lpthread -ldl
Tungsten Renderer CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.2 246.3 358.5 CPUFreq Performance 120.3 246.2 358.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 100 200 300 400 500
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Ksamples, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 1018.74, N = 13 SE +/- 503.58, N = 3 53460 55014
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Ksamples Per Watt, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 30 60 90 120 150 127.59 130.65
Chaos Group V-RAY CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.3 419.0 492.2 CPUFreq Performance 120.8 421.1 492.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.52, N = 4 SE +/- 0.73, N = 15 49.45 62.29 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.0698 0.1396 0.2094 0.2792 0.349 0.29 0.31
x265 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 121.1 169.9 202.1 CPUFreq Performance 120.6 200.8 253.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better x265 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 19.74 20.75 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 0.08 0.08
x265 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max CPUFreq Schedutil 120.6 238.0 293.2 CPUFreq Performance 120.3 250.4 301.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better x265 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring CPUFreq Schedutil CPUFreq Performance 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 59.88 / Avg: 280.92 / Max: 530.69 Min: 59.74 / Avg: 285.23 / Max: 514.05
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4