2 x AMD EPYC 7713 vs. 2 x AMD EPYC 7763 Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 301 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

2 x AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core had the most wins, coming in first place for 64% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (2 x AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core) was 1.047x the speed of the slowest (2 x AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core).

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: OSPray (Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis) at 1.25x, Embree (Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown) at 1.236x, Embree (Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown) at 1.232x, OSPRay Studio (Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer) at 1.227x, GROMACS (Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare) at 1.226x, Blender (Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only) at 1.225x, OSPRay Studio (Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer) at 1.225x, LuxCoreRender (Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism) at 1.224x, OSPRay Studio (Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer) at 1.223x, OSPRay Studio (Camera: 3 - Resolution: 1080p - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer) at 1.219x.

301 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread