AMD EPYC 7313P 16-Core testing with a ASRockRack ROMED8HM3 (L3.31A BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G Processor: AMD EPYC 7313P 16-Core @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack ROMED8HM3 (L3.31A BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 4 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40EB3-CWE, Disk: 256GB Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G + 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 + 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZQL21T9HCJR-00A07 + 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ7L31T9, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: L1530S, Network: 4 x Intel I350 + 8 x Broadcom BCM57504 NetXtreme-E 10Gb/25Gb/40Gb/50Gb/100Gb/200Gb
OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-20-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 23.0.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-12-Pa930Z/gcc-12-12.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-12-Pa930Z/gcc-12-12.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vDisk Notes: NONE / relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xa001173Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.18+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu4)Python Notes: Python 3.11.2Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Retpolines IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.27 0.54 0.81 1.08 1.35 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.2 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 13.45, N = 3 2919.86 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.04, N = 3 164.61 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.96, N = 3 162.75 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 22.49 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 37.13 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 155.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 22.1 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.54, N = 3 160.16 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy
BlogBench BlogBench is designed to replicate the load of a real-world busy file server by stressing the file-system with multiple threads of random reads, writes, and rewrites. The behavior is mimicked of that of a blog by creating blogs with content and pictures, modifying blog posts, adding comments to these blogs, and then reading the content of the blogs. All of these blogs generated are created locally with fake content and pictures. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 29767.11, N = 4 2583441 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2
simdjson This is a benchmark of SIMDJSON, a high performance JSON parser. SIMDJSON aims to be the fastest JSON parser and is used by projects like Microsoft FishStore, Yandex ClickHouse, Shopify, and others. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: Kostya Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.675 1.35 2.025 2.7 3.375 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 3 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.9653 1.9306 2.8959 3.8612 4.8265 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.29 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.2318 0.4636 0.6954 0.9272 1.159 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.03 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.846 1.692 2.538 3.384 4.23 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 3.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 1.0125 2.025 3.0375 4.05 5.0625 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.5 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test profile makes use of the built-in "openssl speed" benchmarking capabilities. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA256 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 5000M 10000M 15000M 20000M 25000M SE +/- 14943802.09, N = 3 22993726407 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: SHA512 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 1600M 3200M 4800M 6400M 8000M SE +/- 2094538.48, N = 3 7488470303 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org sign/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 2.08, N = 3 4086.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: RSA4096 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 35.04, N = 3 267102.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 15000M 30000M 45000M 60000M 75000M SE +/- 15011809.33, N = 3 68781981153 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-128-GCM Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 16000M 32000M 48000M 64000M 80000M SE +/- 11628441.51, N = 3 73661862917 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: AES-256-GCM Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 14000M 28000M 42000M 56000M 70000M SE +/- 31623463.71, N = 3 67122362140 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.1 Algorithm: ChaCha20-Poly1305 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 10000M 20000M 30000M 40000M 50000M SE +/- 8554586.58, N = 3 46271346460 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
ClickHouse ClickHouse is an open-source, high performance OLAP data management system. This test profile uses ClickHouse's standard benchmark recommendations per https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/operations/performance-test/ / https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/tree/main/clickhouse with the 100 million rows web analytics dataset. The reported value is the query processing time using the geometric mean of all separate queries performed as an aggregate. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Minute, Geo Mean, More Is Better ClickHouse 22.12.3.5 100M Rows Hits Dataset, First Run / Cold Cache Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 234.51 MIN: 12.87 / MAX: 5454.55
etcd Etcd is a distributed, reliable key-value store intended for critical data of a distributed system. Etcd is written in Golang and part of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) and used by Kubernetes, Rook, CoreDNS, and other open-source software. This test profile uses Etcd's built-in benchmark to stress the PUT and RANGE performance of a single node / local system. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 722.94, N = 15 44786.61
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.495 0.99 1.485 1.98 2.475 SE +/- 0.04, N = 15 2.2
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 519.09, N = 15 45585.30
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.495 0.99 1.485 1.98 2.475 SE +/- 0.03, N = 15 2.2
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 663.53, N = 3 83067.36
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 12.0
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 934.37, N = 15 45449.69
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.495 0.99 1.485 1.98 2.475 SE +/- 0.05, N = 15 2.2
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 676.55, N = 3 81784.49
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 12.2
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 590.84, N = 3 81364.11
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: PUT - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 12.2
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 753.75, N = 15 45103.01
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.495 0.99 1.485 1.98 2.475 SE +/- 0.04, N = 15 2.2
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 752.97, N = 15 45023.16
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.495 0.99 1.485 1.98 2.475 SE +/- 0.04, N = 15 2.2
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 331.06, N = 3 81366.20
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 50 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 12.3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 712.30, N = 15 44304.62
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 100 - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.5175 1.035 1.5525 2.07 2.5875 SE +/- 0.04, N = 15 2.3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 643.55, N = 3 80863.05
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 100 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 12.3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests/sec, More Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 168.32, N = 3 81558.30
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better etcd 3.5.4 Test: RANGE - Connections: 500 - Clients: 1000 - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 12.2
Apache Spark This is a benchmark of Apache Spark with its PySpark interface. Apache Spark is an open-source unified analytics engine for large-scale data processing and dealing with big data. This test profile benchmars the Apache Spark in a single-system configuration using spark-submit. The test makes use of DIYBigData's pyspark-benchmark (https://github.com/DIYBigData/pyspark-benchmark/) for generating of test data and various Apache Spark operations. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 100
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 500
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 1000
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
Row Count: 1000000 - Partitions: 2000
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 100
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 500
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 100
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 500
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 100
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 500
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 1000
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
Row Count: 10000000 - Partitions: 2000
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 1000
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
Row Count: 20000000 - Partitions: 2000
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 1000
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
Row Count: 40000000 - Partitions: 2000
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: _pickle.PicklingError: Could not serialize object: IndexError: tuple index out of range
CockroachDB CockroachDB is a cloud-native, distributed SQL database for data intensive applications. This test profile uses a server-less CockroachDB configuration to test various Coackroach workloads on the local host with a single node. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org ops/s, More Is Better CockroachDB 22.2 Workload: MoVR - Concurrency: 128 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 4.38, N = 3 341.0
Dragonflydb Dragonfly is an open-source database server that is a "modern Redis replacement" that aims to be the fastest memory store while being compliant with the Redis and Memcached protocols. For benchmarking Dragonfly, Memtier_benchmark is used as a NoSQL Redis/Memcache traffic generation plus benchmarking tool developed by Redis Labs. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 3600.36, N = 3 2825607.96 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 17365.88, N = 3 2978932.50 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 50 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 8428.69, N = 3 2741418.59 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 4431.69, N = 3 2931329.03 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 7361.77, N = 3 3024539.94 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Dragonflydb 0.6 Clients: 200 - Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 11777.85, N = 3 2790892.40 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
Memcached Memcached is a high performance, distributed memory object caching system. This Memcached test profiles makes use of memtier_benchmark for excuting this CPU/memory-focused server benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:1 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 3779.98, N = 3 1472556.36 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:5 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 3310.78, N = 3 2245072.77 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 5:1 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1167.03, N = 3 926785.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:10 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 5130.79, N = 3 2274214.02 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better Memcached 1.6.19 Set To Get Ratio: 1:100 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 16006.57, N = 3 2200766.18 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 50 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 17774.96, N = 15 2070232.94 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 500 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 4963.87, N = 3 2633247.75 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 50 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 42897.52, N = 3 2972341.58 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 50 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 10532.31, N = 3 2298589.83 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 500 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 20110.64, N = 15 2080415.50 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: GET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 6902.23, N = 3 2576915.67 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 500 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 27255.92, N = 3 3013628.25 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 50 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 18667.91, N = 15 1760213.10 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 500 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 24700.19, N = 15 2330743.32 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: SET - Parallel Connections: 1000 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 19953.71, N = 15 2064898.77 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPOP - Parallel Connections: 1000 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 4560.37, N = 3 1773181.25 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 500 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 18311.16, N = 3 1809706.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: SADD - Parallel Connections: 1000 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 24643.08, N = 15 2317845.42 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Redis 7.0.4 Test: LPUSH - Parallel Connections: 1000 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 28580.69, N = 12 1757544.58 1. (CXX) g++ options: -MM -MT -g3 -fvisibility=hidden -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 64 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 0.65, N = 3 607 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -pie -fstack-protector -O3 -shared -lrt -lpthread -lz -ldl -lm -lstdc++
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 128 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.78, N = 3 335 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -pie -fstack-protector -O3 -shared -lrt -lpthread -lz -ldl -lm -lstdc++
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 256 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.04, N = 3 292 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -pie -fstack-protector -O3 -shared -lrt -lpthread -lz -ldl -lm -lstdc++
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 512 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.14, N = 3 310 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -pie -fstack-protector -O3 -shared -lrt -lpthread -lz -ldl -lm -lstdc++
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 1024 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 3.78, N = 3 342 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -pie -fstack-protector -O3 -shared -lrt -lpthread -lz -ldl -lm -lstdc++
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 2048 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 3.58, N = 3 354 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -pie -fstack-protector -O3 -shared -lrt -lpthread -lz -ldl -lm -lstdc++
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 4096 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 3.99, N = 3 372 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -pie -fstack-protector -O3 -shared -lrt -lpthread -lz -ldl -lm -lstdc++
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 11.0.1 Clients: 8192 Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 2.98, N = 9 375 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -pie -fstack-protector -O3 -shared -lrt -lpthread -lz -ldl -lm -lstdc++
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.0036 0.0072 0.0108 0.0144 0.018 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.016 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 10.30, N = 12 1259 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.1789 0.3578 0.5367 0.7156 0.8945 SE +/- 0.007, N = 12 0.795 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 8295.32, N = 3 1052307 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.0106 0.0212 0.0318 0.0424 0.053 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.047 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 5312.14, N = 3 1045001 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.0216 0.0432 0.0648 0.0864 0.108 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.096 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 4157.87, N = 3 1034951 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.0545 0.109 0.1635 0.218 0.2725 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.242 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.09, N = 3 1088 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 45.96 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1870.15, N = 3 1020161 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.1103 0.2206 0.3309 0.4412 0.5515 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.490 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 7167.64, N = 3 1016221 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.1771 0.3542 0.5313 0.7084 0.8855 SE +/- 0.006, N = 3 0.787 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 587.91, N = 3 55087 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.0041 0.0082 0.0123 0.0164 0.0205 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.018 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 8.15, N = 9 994 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.87, N = 9 100.71 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 7756.95, N = 3 1007472 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.2234 0.4468 0.6702 0.8936 1.117 SE +/- 0.008, N = 3 0.993 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 9.69, N = 3 724 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 4.61, N = 3 345.32 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 19.38, N = 12 500 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 38.01, N = 12 1017.02 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Only
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: pgbench: error: need at least 5003 open files, but system limit is 1024
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 14.61, N = 12 345 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 97.03, N = 12 2361.41 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 6.66, N = 3 927 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.2428 0.4856 0.7284 0.9712 1.214 SE +/- 0.008, N = 3 1.079 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 10356.20, N = 3 957871 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.0117 0.0234 0.0351 0.0468 0.0585 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.052 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 361.68, N = 3 44659 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.0052 0.0104 0.0156 0.0208 0.026 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.023 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 13.32, N = 9 370 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1000 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 101.27, N = 9 2731.23 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 5000 - Mode: Read Write
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: pgbench: error: need at least 5003 open files, but system limit is 1024
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 3120.14, N = 3 932379 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.0241 0.0482 0.0723 0.0964 0.1205 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.107 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 2946.52, N = 3 920764 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.061 0.122 0.183 0.244 0.305 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.271 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 145.33, N = 12 7065 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.154, N = 12 7.112 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 6324.13, N = 3 919003 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.1224 0.2448 0.3672 0.4896 0.612 SE +/- 0.004, N = 3 0.544 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 1897.32, N = 3 900803 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 800 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.1998 0.3996 0.5994 0.7992 0.999 SE +/- 0.002, N = 3 0.888 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 24.21, N = 6 559 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.4068 0.8136 1.2204 1.6272 2.034 SE +/- 0.081, N = 6 1.808 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 130K 260K 390K 520K 650K SE +/- 7133.29, N = 3 607540 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL 15 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G 0.0185 0.037 0.0555 0.074 0.0925 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.082 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lm
Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: pgbench: error: Run was aborted; the above results are incomplete.
Scaling Factor: 25000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. E: pgbench: error: could not create connection for setup
Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G Processor: AMD EPYC 7313P 16-Core @ 3.00GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack ROMED8HM3 (L3.31A BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 4 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s Samsung M393A4K40EB3-CWE, Disk: 256GB Toshiba KXG60ZNV256G + 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ1L21T9HCLS-00A07 + 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZQL21T9HCJR-00A07 + 2 x 1920GB SAMSUNG MZ7L31T9, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: L1530S, Network: 4 x Intel I350 + 8 x Broadcom BCM57504 NetXtreme-E 10Gb/25Gb/40Gb/50Gb/100Gb/200Gb
OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.2.0-20-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.0, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 23.0.2 (LLVM 15.0.7 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 12.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseCompiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-12-Pa930Z/gcc-12-12.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-12-Pa930Z/gcc-12-12.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vDisk Notes: NONE / relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xa001173Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.18+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu4)Python Notes: Python 3.11.2Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Retpolines IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 14 April 2023 08:25 by user root.