AMD Ryzen 5 4500U testing for a future article.
Performance Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vDisk Notes: NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rwProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance - CPU Microcode: 0x8600102Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-3ubuntu1)Python Notes: Python 3.8.3Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: disabled RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Ondemand Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vDisk Notes: NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rwProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand - CPU Microcode: 0x8600102Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-3ubuntu1)Python Notes: Python 3.8.3Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: disabled RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Conservative Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vDisk Notes: NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rwProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq conservative - CPU Microcode: 0x8600102Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-3ubuntu1)Python Notes: Python 3.8.3Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: disabled RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Schedutil Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vDisk Notes: NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rwProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil - CPU Microcode: 0x8600102Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-3ubuntu1)Python Notes: Python 3.8.3Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: disabled RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Powersave Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 4500U @ 2.38GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: LENOVO LNVNB161216 (EECN20WW BIOS), Chipset: AMD Renoir Root Complex, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB SKHynix_HFM256GDHTNI-87A0B, Graphics: AMD Renoir 512MB (1500/400MHz), Audio: AMD Device 1637, Network: Realtek RTL8822CE 802.11ac PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-050800daily20200713-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vDisk Notes: NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rwProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq powersave - CPU Microcode: 0x8600102Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-3ubuntu1)Python Notes: Python 3.8.3Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: disabled RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
PyBench This test profile reports the total time of the different average timed test results from PyBench. PyBench reports average test times for different functions such as BuiltinFunctionCalls and NestedForLoops, with this total result providing a rough estimate as to Python's average performance on a given system. This test profile runs PyBench each time for 20 rounds. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 SE +/- 2.33, N = 3 SE +/- 4.37, N = 3 SE +/- 4.33, N = 3 SE +/- 22.50, N = 3 992 974 983 998 2827 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 5.7 7.0 Ondemand 1.9 5.9 7.3 Conservative 1.8 5.9 7.7 Schedutil 1.6 5.8 7.6 Powersave 1.6 2.8 3.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 3 6 9 12 15 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 78 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 78 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 79 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 80 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 99 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 64.5 72.4 76.8 Ondemand 65.1 72.9 77.3 Conservative 63.1 73.6 77.3 Schedutil 66.9 73.5 81.0 Powersave 35.3 36.5 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 50.0 54.3 58.0 Ondemand 50.0 53.8 57.0 Conservative 51.0 55.1 58.0 Schedutil 50.0 53.2 57.0 Powersave 33.0 34.5 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 65.0 72.1 76.0 Ondemand 65.0 72.6 77.0 Conservative 63.0 73.3 77.0 Schedutil 67.0 73.1 81.0 Powersave 35.0 36.3 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Min: 990 / Avg: 991.67 / Max: 993 Min: 970 / Avg: 974.33 / Max: 978 Min: 974 / Avg: 982.67 / Max: 988 Min: 991 / Avg: 998.33 / Max: 1006 Min: 2782 / Avg: 2827 / Max: 2850
Nettle GNU Nettle is a low-level cryptographic library. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: sha512 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 0.07, N = 10 SE +/- 0.56, N = 10 SE +/- 0.14, N = 10 SE +/- 0.13, N = 10 SE +/- 0.19, N = 10 575.71 574.99 575.56 575.63 201.62 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lm -lcrypto Mbyte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s Per Watt, More Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: sha512 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 181.06 186.70 186.06 183.34 86.41 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 3.2 5.9 Ondemand 1.7 3.1 5.5 Conservative 1.7 3.1 5.5 Schedutil 1.7 3.1 5.4 Powersave 1.8 2.3 3.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 2.15 4.3 6.45 8.6 10.75 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 10 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 10 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 10 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 10 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 8 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.3 55.7 63.0 Ondemand 44.3 55.6 62.8 Conservative 44.3 55.7 61.3 Schedutil 44.0 56.0 62.0 Powersave 34.5 35.0 35.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 43.5 46.0 Ondemand 42.0 43.5 46.0 Conservative 42.0 43.4 46.0 Schedutil 42.0 43.2 45.0 Powersave 33.0 33.2 34.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 55.4 63.0 Ondemand 44.0 54.8 62.0 Conservative 44.0 55.6 61.0 Schedutil 44.0 55.6 62.0 Powersave 34.0 34.7 35.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: sha512 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 575.39 / Avg: 575.71 / Max: 576.08 Min: 570.06 / Avg: 574.99 / Max: 575.92 Min: 574.46 / Avg: 575.56 / Max: 575.96 Min: 574.97 / Avg: 575.63 / Max: 576.08 Min: 199.96 / Avg: 201.62 / Max: 202.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lm -lcrypto
Selenium This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 SE +/- 0.07, N = 4 SE +/- 0.06, N = 4 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 28.9 28.9 28.8 28.9 82.2 1. firefox 77.0.1 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.4 5.3 12.6 Ondemand 1.8 4.7 12.2 Conservative 1.7 4.5 11.5 Schedutil 1.6 5.0 11.3 Powersave 1.8 3.6 5.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 43 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 40 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 40 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 44 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 40 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.5 58.1 66.3 Ondemand 43.6 54.2 62.1 Conservative 43.6 54.0 61.4 Schedutil 43.1 55.5 63.3 Powersave 35.8 36.4 37.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 43.0 44.5 48.0 Ondemand 41.0 42.5 45.0 Conservative 41.0 42.1 45.0 Schedutil 41.0 42.2 46.0 Powersave 34.0 34.7 36.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 57.3 64.0 Ondemand 43.0 53.4 62.0 Conservative 43.0 53.6 62.0 Schedutil 43.0 55.3 63.0 Powersave 35.0 36.1 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 16 32 48 64 80 Min: 28.8 / Avg: 28.85 / Max: 28.9 Min: 28.7 / Avg: 28.9 / Max: 29 Min: 28.7 / Avg: 28.83 / Max: 29 Min: 28.9 / Avg: 28.93 / Max: 29 Min: 82.2 / Avg: 82.2 / Max: 82.2 1. firefox 77.0.1
Nettle GNU Nettle is a low-level cryptographic library. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: chacha Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.07, N = 11 SE +/- 0.10, N = 11 SE +/- 0.12, N = 11 SE +/- 0.10, N = 11 SE +/- 0.04, N = 11 903.89 904.06 903.66 903.75 316.81 MIN: 460.57 / MAX: 2466.44 MIN: 460.43 / MAX: 2466.78 MIN: 460.32 / MAX: 2465.72 MIN: 460.23 / MAX: 2466.17 MIN: 161.29 / MAX: 864.42 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lm -lcrypto Mbyte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s Per Watt, More Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: chacha Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 80 160 240 320 400 367.68 364.49 371.68 366.42 143.21 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 2.5 3.8 Ondemand 1.8 2.5 3.9 Conservative 1.7 2.4 3.9 Schedutil 1.8 2.5 3.9 Powersave 1.9 2.2 2.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 1.1081 2.2162 3.3243 4.4324 5.5405 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 7 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 7 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 7 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 7 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 6 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 46.6 52.5 58.1 Ondemand 46.8 53.2 58.5 Conservative 47.6 52.7 58.0 Schedutil 47.3 53.1 59.3 Powersave 34.6 35.1 35.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 46.1 48.0 Ondemand 44.0 46.1 48.0 Conservative 44.0 46.1 49.0 Schedutil 44.0 45.7 48.0 Powersave 33.0 33.3 34.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 46.0 52.2 58.0 Ondemand 47.0 52.6 59.0 Conservative 47.0 52.2 58.0 Schedutil 47.0 52.7 59.0 Powersave 34.0 34.6 35.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 System Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: chacha Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 160 320 480 640 800 Min: 903.43 / Avg: 903.89 / Max: 904.23 Min: 903.54 / Avg: 904.05 / Max: 904.61 Min: 902.73 / Avg: 903.66 / Max: 903.98 Min: 903.15 / Avg: 903.75 / Max: 904.18 Min: 316.48 / Avg: 316.81 / Max: 316.96 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lm -lcrypto
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: poly1305-aes Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 0.27, N = 14 SE +/- 0.31, N = 14 SE +/- 0.38, N = 14 SE +/- 0.39, N = 14 SE +/- 0.12, N = 15 2464.64 2463.96 2463.39 2464.47 863.96 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lm -lcrypto Mbyte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s Per Watt, More Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: poly1305-aes Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 300 600 900 1200 1500 1193.06 1156.11 1134.71 1134.39 403.45 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 2.1 3.3 Ondemand 1.7 2.1 3.9 Conservative 1.7 2.2 3.4 Schedutil 1.7 2.2 3.4 Powersave 1.9 2.1 2.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 1.0941 2.1882 3.2823 4.3764 5.4705 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 5 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 5 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 5 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 5 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 5 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 41.4 46.3 54.0 Ondemand 40.5 46.0 53.9 Conservative 40.8 45.9 51.5 Schedutil 41.0 46.4 51.8 Powersave 35.0 35.0 35.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 39.0 40.7 42.0 Ondemand 39.0 40.3 42.0 Conservative 39.0 40.3 42.0 Schedutil 39.0 40.2 41.0 Powersave 33.0 33.1 34.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 41.0 45.9 54.0 Ondemand 40.0 45.9 54.0 Conservative 40.0 45.8 52.0 Schedutil 40.0 45.6 52.0 Powersave 35.0 35.0 35.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 System Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: poly1305-aes Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 400 800 1200 1600 2000 Min: 2462.37 / Avg: 2464.64 / Max: 2466.53 Min: 2461.11 / Avg: 2463.96 / Max: 2465.62 Min: 2461.32 / Avg: 2463.39 / Max: 2465.28 Min: 2461.12 / Avg: 2464.47 / Max: 2465.73 Min: 862.74 / Avg: 863.96 / Max: 864.4 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lm -lcrypto
Selenium This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.92, N = 3 392.8 392.7 392.6 392.7 1119.9 1. firefox 77.0.1 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 5.9 13.4 Ondemand 1.8 6.0 11.6 Conservative 1.7 5.5 10.8 Schedutil 1.7 5.9 11.5 Powersave 1.9 3.3 5.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 73 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 73 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 72 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 73 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 75 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 56.9 64.1 Ondemand 40.4 56.5 65.6 Conservative 40.5 55.1 61.5 Schedutil 39.9 55.9 63.0 Powersave 35.0 35.9 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 41.0 44.1 48.0 Ondemand 39.0 42.0 44.0 Conservative 39.0 41.7 45.0 Schedutil 39.0 41.8 45.0 Powersave 33.0 34.0 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 56.9 64.0 Ondemand 40.0 56.2 65.0 Conservative 40.0 54.7 61.0 Schedutil 40.0 55.6 63.0 Powersave 35.0 35.4 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 200 400 600 800 1000 Min: 392.5 / Avg: 392.77 / Max: 393.2 Min: 392 / Avg: 392.7 / Max: 393.1 Min: 392 / Avg: 392.57 / Max: 393 Min: 392.4 / Avg: 392.67 / Max: 392.8 Min: 1118.3 / Avg: 1119.87 / Max: 1121.5 1. firefox 77.0.1
Nettle GNU Nettle is a low-level cryptographic library. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: aes256 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 0.36, N = 8 SE +/- 1.76, N = 8 SE +/- 0.82, N = 8 SE +/- 1.21, N = 8 SE +/- 0.28, N = 8 5618.83 5616.23 5616.79 5615.10 1969.93 MIN: 4073.65 / MAX: 8723.2 MIN: 4068.38 / MAX: 8720.14 MIN: 4069.17 / MAX: 8717.93 MIN: 4069.71 / MAX: 8722.03 MIN: 1428.15 / MAX: 3056.67 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lm -lcrypto Mbyte/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s Per Watt, More Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: aes256 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 300 600 900 1200 1500 1445.63 1401.17 1440.62 1428.03 839.74 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 3.9 6.0 Ondemand 1.7 4.0 6.9 Conservative 1.7 3.9 7.2 Schedutil 1.8 3.9 6.2 Powersave 1.7 2.3 3.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 3 6 9 12 15 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 17 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 17 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 17 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 17 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 10 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 60.9 70.5 80.4 Ondemand 61.9 73.2 85.4 Conservative 63.6 72.9 81.0 Schedutil 61.9 71.6 82.8 Powersave 36.5 38.1 40.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 51.0 55.2 61.0 Ondemand 50.0 55.2 61.0 Conservative 51.0 55.5 64.0 Schedutil 50.0 55.0 60.0 Powersave 35.0 36.7 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 61.0 70.2 80.0 Ondemand 61.0 72.9 85.0 Conservative 61.0 72.0 81.0 Schedutil 62.0 71.4 82.0 Powersave 36.0 37.7 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: aes256 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Min: 5617.27 / Avg: 5618.83 / Max: 5620.41 Min: 5607.87 / Avg: 5616.23 / Max: 5622.35 Min: 5612.67 / Avg: 5616.79 / Max: 5619.31 Min: 5609.56 / Avg: 5615.1 / Max: 5619.13 Min: 1968.92 / Avg: 1969.93 / Max: 1971.19 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lnettle -lm -lcrypto
G'MIC G'MIC is an open-source framework for image processing. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better G'MIC Test: Plotting Isosurface Of A 3D Volume, 1000 Times Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 20.68 20.76 20.90 21.19 58.09 1. Version 2.4.5, Copyright (c) 2008-2019, David Tschumperle. CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.4 5.4 8.1 Ondemand 1.7 5.4 6.9 Conservative 1.7 5.5 8.4 Schedutil 1.7 5.4 6.5 Powersave 1.9 3.5 3.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better G'MIC CPU Power Consumption Monitor 3 6 9 12 15 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 68 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 68 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 69 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 68 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 109 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 50.4 63.7 68.9 Ondemand 43.6 58.1 61.3 Conservative 44.0 58.4 62.4 Schedutil 42.8 57.2 60.5 Powersave 35.3 36.0 36.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better G'MIC CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 46.0 49.1 51.0 Ondemand 42.0 44.2 46.0 Conservative 43.0 45.2 48.0 Schedutil 42.0 44.2 47.0 Powersave 33.0 34.1 36.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better G'MIC GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 50.0 63.1 67.0 Ondemand 43.0 57.7 61.0 Conservative 44.0 57.9 62.0 Schedutil 42.0 56.8 60.0 Powersave 35.0 35.5 36.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better G'MIC System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better G'MIC Test: Plotting Isosurface Of A 3D Volume, 1000 Times Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 20.65 / Avg: 20.68 / Max: 20.74 Min: 20.64 / Avg: 20.76 / Max: 20.88 Min: 20.88 / Avg: 20.9 / Max: 20.93 Min: 21.12 / Avg: 21.19 / Max: 21.26 Min: 57.83 / Avg: 58.09 / Max: 58.48 1. Version 2.4.5, Copyright (c) 2008-2019, David Tschumperle.
Montage Astronomical Image Mosaic Engine Montage is an open-source astronomical image mosaic engine. This BSD-licensed astronomy software is developed by the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Montage Astronomical Image Mosaic Engine 6.0 Mosaic of M17, K band, 1.5 deg x 1.5 deg Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 79.22 79.35 79.56 79.26 222.06 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -lcfitsio -lm -O2 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 6.0 8.6 Ondemand 1.7 5.9 7.6 Conservative 1.7 6.7 13.7 Schedutil 1.6 6.0 8.0 Powersave 1.5 3.6 4.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Montage Astronomical Image Mosaic Engine 6.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 252 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 247 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 281 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 250 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 404 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 56.5 72.4 76.6 Ondemand 53.3 70.7 74.5 Conservative 51.3 72.8 77.1 Schedutil 48.3 68.8 72.8 Powersave 36.0 37.2 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Montage Astronomical Image Mosaic Engine 6.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 52.0 55.7 61.0 Ondemand 50.0 52.8 55.0 Conservative 50.0 54.7 59.0 Schedutil 47.0 50.9 53.0 Powersave 33.0 35.2 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Montage Astronomical Image Mosaic Engine 6.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 56.0 72.0 76.0 Ondemand 53.0 70.3 74.0 Conservative 51.0 72.4 77.0 Schedutil 48.0 68.3 73.0 Powersave 36.0 36.9 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Montage Astronomical Image Mosaic Engine 6.0 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Montage Astronomical Image Mosaic Engine 6.0 Mosaic of M17, K band, 1.5 deg x 1.5 deg Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 79.2 / Avg: 79.22 / Max: 79.24 Min: 79.21 / Avg: 79.35 / Max: 79.56 Min: 79.25 / Avg: 79.56 / Max: 80.01 Min: 79.04 / Avg: 79.26 / Max: 79.56 Min: 221.85 / Avg: 222.06 / Max: 222.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -lcfitsio -lm -O2
GEGL GEGL is the Generic Graphics Library and is the library/framework used by GIMP and other applications like GNOME Photos. This test profile times how long it takes to complete various GEGL operations on a static set of sample JPEG images. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Color Enhance Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 61.13 61.46 62.22 61.69 170.41 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 5.8 9.1 Ondemand 1.7 5.8 9.3 Conservative 1.8 5.4 7.5 Schedutil 1.7 5.7 10.1 Powersave 1.3 3.5 4.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 188 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 190 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 180 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 187 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 304 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.8 63.2 70.8 Ondemand 45.0 62.8 71.3 Conservative 44.8 60.7 65.5 Schedutil 44.3 62.5 70.5 Powersave 36.5 39.2 40.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 46.9 51.0 Ondemand 44.0 47.3 51.0 Conservative 43.0 46.8 50.0 Schedutil 43.0 46.1 49.0 Powersave 35.0 37.2 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 63.0 71.0 Ondemand 45.0 62.3 71.0 Conservative 44.0 60.3 65.0 Schedutil 44.0 62.0 69.0 Powersave 36.0 38.8 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Color Enhance Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 61.08 / Avg: 61.13 / Max: 61.15 Min: 61.4 / Avg: 61.46 / Max: 61.49 Min: 62.12 / Avg: 62.22 / Max: 62.41 Min: 61.66 / Avg: 61.69 / Max: 61.71 Min: 170.35 / Avg: 170.41 / Max: 170.54
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Cartoon Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 95.48 96.44 96.96 96.54 264.22 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 6.6 16.1 Ondemand 1.8 6.5 17.8 Conservative 1.6 6.2 16.3 Schedutil 1.4 6.5 17.0 Powersave 1.8 3.6 7.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 331 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 328 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 315 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 327 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 488 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 47.3 65.1 73.3 Ondemand 46.8 64.1 71.8 Conservative 45.9 63.6 69.6 Schedutil 50.1 64.5 73.3 Powersave 36.0 38.6 41.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 46.0 49.0 53.0 Ondemand 46.0 49.2 53.0 Conservative 45.0 48.8 52.0 Schedutil 44.0 48.6 53.0 Powersave 33.0 36.4 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 47.0 64.7 73.0 Ondemand 46.0 63.8 72.0 Conservative 46.0 63.2 69.0 Schedutil 47.0 64.0 72.0 Powersave 36.0 38.2 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Cartoon Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 50 100 150 200 250 Min: 95.43 / Avg: 95.48 / Max: 95.53 Min: 96.25 / Avg: 96.44 / Max: 96.57 Min: 96.92 / Avg: 96.96 / Max: 97.01 Min: 96.42 / Avg: 96.54 / Max: 96.63 Min: 264.05 / Avg: 264.22 / Max: 264.42
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Reflect Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 32.71 32.99 33.74 33.07 90.40 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 6.1 11.0 Ondemand 1.7 6.0 8.3 Conservative 1.7 5.3 7.4 Schedutil 1.7 6.0 7.9 Powersave 1.8 3.4 4.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 114 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 112 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 101 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 111 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 163 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.5 62.8 71.4 Ondemand 45.5 62.1 70.8 Conservative 45.8 60.1 64.3 Schedutil 44.4 62.9 69.6 Powersave 38.3 39.6 40.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 47.7 52.0 Ondemand 45.0 47.6 52.0 Conservative 44.0 47.2 50.0 Schedutil 44.0 46.6 50.0 Powersave 36.0 37.6 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 62.1 70.0 Ondemand 45.0 61.6 68.0 Conservative 45.0 59.5 62.0 Schedutil 44.0 62.8 70.0 Powersave 38.0 39.1 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Reflect Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 32.66 / Avg: 32.71 / Max: 32.75 Min: 32.96 / Avg: 32.99 / Max: 33.05 Min: 33.69 / Avg: 33.73 / Max: 33.8 Min: 32.99 / Avg: 33.07 / Max: 33.13 Min: 90.31 / Avg: 90.4 / Max: 90.55
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Antialias Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 41.37 41.89 42.39 41.81 114.15 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 7.1 15.9 Ondemand 1.7 7.5 16.0 Conservative 1.6 6.5 11.3 Schedutil 1.7 6.8 13.0 Powersave 1.8 3.7 5.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 162 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 174 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 153 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 157 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 221 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 65.2 72.6 Ondemand 45.0 64.3 73.3 Conservative 44.9 64.1 73.0 Schedutil 44.3 63.8 71.5 Powersave 36.5 39.3 41.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 48.5 53.0 Ondemand 44.0 48.6 54.0 Conservative 44.0 48.3 53.0 Schedutil 43.0 47.7 54.0 Powersave 34.0 36.9 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 64.8 72.0 Ondemand 44.0 63.7 73.0 Conservative 44.0 63.3 71.0 Schedutil 44.0 63.4 71.0 Powersave 36.0 38.9 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Antialias Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 41.32 / Avg: 41.37 / Max: 41.43 Min: 41.83 / Avg: 41.89 / Max: 41.95 Min: 42.19 / Avg: 42.39 / Max: 42.56 Min: 41.71 / Avg: 41.81 / Max: 41.88 Min: 114.02 / Avg: 114.15 / Max: 114.29
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Tile Glass Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 33.14 33.60 34.14 33.73 91.08 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.4 6.7 10.5 Ondemand 1.8 6.8 12.5 Conservative 1.8 6.1 9.2 Schedutil 1.7 6.0 9.4 Powersave 1.8 3.5 4.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 124 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 129 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 118 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 114 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 166 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.3 62.0 69.1 Ondemand 45.4 61.8 70.5 Conservative 45.3 60.1 64.9 Schedutil 44.8 62.7 70.4 Powersave 35.0 37.9 39.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 47.8 51.0 Ondemand 44.0 47.5 51.0 Conservative 44.0 47.4 51.0 Schedutil 44.0 47.1 51.0 Powersave 33.0 35.9 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 61.5 69.0 Ondemand 45.0 61.4 70.0 Conservative 45.0 59.6 62.0 Schedutil 44.0 62.4 70.0 Powersave 35.0 37.6 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Tile Glass Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 33.12 / Avg: 33.14 / Max: 33.19 Min: 33.56 / Avg: 33.6 / Max: 33.65 Min: 34.09 / Avg: 34.14 / Max: 34.21 Min: 33.66 / Avg: 33.73 / Max: 33.84 Min: 91.02 / Avg: 91.07 / Max: 91.11
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Wavelet Blur Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 65.52 66.03 66.72 66.28 179.92 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 6.1 13.1 Ondemand 1.7 6.4 13.5 Conservative 1.5 5.7 11.7 Schedutil 1.5 6.0 13.0 Powersave 1.8 3.5 5.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 212 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 225 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 202 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 213 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 324 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.8 63.0 70.1 Ondemand 44.8 62.6 70.6 Conservative 45.0 59.9 63.8 Schedutil 44.3 62.4 70.3 Powersave 35.8 38.6 41.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 47.4 51.0 Ondemand 44.0 48.1 52.0 Conservative 44.0 47.4 51.0 Schedutil 44.0 46.6 50.0 Powersave 33.0 36.4 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 62.4 69.0 Ondemand 44.0 62.3 71.0 Conservative 44.0 59.4 64.0 Schedutil 44.0 62.1 70.0 Powersave 35.0 38.2 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Wavelet Blur Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 65.52 / Avg: 65.52 / Max: 65.53 Min: 65.95 / Avg: 66.03 / Max: 66.14 Min: 66.49 / Avg: 66.71 / Max: 66.91 Min: 66.17 / Avg: 66.28 / Max: 66.37 Min: 179.83 / Avg: 179.92 / Max: 179.98
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Rotate 90 Degrees Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 43.31 43.80 44.47 43.72 118.58 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 7.4 13.7 Ondemand 1.7 7.2 12.8 Conservative 1.8 7.2 16.1 Schedutil 1.8 7.5 16.7 Powersave 1.6 3.8 6.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 174 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 173 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 174 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 180 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 233 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.3 65.8 73.0 Ondemand 44.3 65.8 73.5 Conservative 44.3 65.6 74.1 Schedutil 43.5 65.1 72.3 Powersave 35.6 38.4 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 43.0 47.8 54.0 Ondemand 44.0 48.1 54.0 Conservative 44.0 48.1 53.0 Schedutil 43.0 47.3 51.0 Powersave 33.0 35.9 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 65.6 73.0 Ondemand 44.0 65.6 72.0 Conservative 44.0 64.9 74.0 Schedutil 43.0 64.6 73.0 Powersave 35.0 38.0 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Rotate 90 Degrees Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 43.21 / Avg: 43.31 / Max: 43.41 Min: 43.79 / Avg: 43.8 / Max: 43.82 Min: 44.42 / Avg: 44.47 / Max: 44.56 Min: 43.57 / Avg: 43.72 / Max: 43.82 Min: 118.48 / Avg: 118.58 / Max: 118.67
Selenium This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Geometric Mean, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 136.91, N = 3 SE +/- 122.53, N = 3 SE +/- 115.33, N = 3 SE +/- 131.61, N = 3 SE +/- 53.56, N = 3 29291 28262 26344 28082 10739 1. firefox 77.0.1 Geometric Mean Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Geometric Mean Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 5179.09 5200.86 4906.75 4909.23 3035.35 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 5.7 14.0 Ondemand 1.7 5.4 9.9 Conservative 1.8 5.4 10.8 Schedutil 1.5 5.7 13.0 Powersave 1.6 3.5 5.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 151 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 150 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 150 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 154 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 123 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 46.5 60.2 66.8 Ondemand 45.0 59.8 66.6 Conservative 45.0 58.8 65.5 Schedutil 44.8 59.2 67.3 Powersave 36.9 38.7 41.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 47.5 52.0 Ondemand 44.0 47.1 51.0 Conservative 44.0 46.8 50.0 Schedutil 43.0 46.0 51.0 Powersave 35.0 36.9 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 46.0 59.8 67.0 Ondemand 45.0 59.3 66.0 Conservative 45.0 58.4 65.0 Schedutil 44.0 58.6 65.0 Powersave 36.0 38.4 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Geometric Mean, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K Min: 29031 / Avg: 29291.33 / Max: 29495 Min: 28022 / Avg: 28262.33 / Max: 28424 Min: 26114 / Avg: 26344.33 / Max: 26470 Min: 27898 / Avg: 28082 / Max: 28337 Min: 10636 / Avg: 10739 / Max: 10816 1. firefox 77.0.1
GEGL GEGL is the Generic Graphics Library and is the library/framework used by GIMP and other applications like GNOME Photos. This test profile times how long it takes to complete various GEGL operations on a static set of sample JPEG images. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Crop Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.024, N = 5 SE +/- 0.042, N = 5 SE +/- 0.048, N = 5 SE +/- 0.048, N = 5 SE +/- 0.091, N = 3 8.842 9.107 9.686 9.150 23.689 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 7.8 11.4 Ondemand 1.8 7.7 11.8 Conservative 1.9 6.3 9.1 Schedutil 1.8 7.2 11.0 Powersave 1.9 3.4 3.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 51 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 51 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 43 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 48 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 48 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 49.9 65.1 70.0 Ondemand 49.3 64.6 68.8 Conservative 51.3 63.0 68.8 Schedutil 48.6 64.6 72.4 Powersave 36.3 37.3 38.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 48.0 50.1 53.0 Ondemand 48.0 50.1 54.0 Conservative 47.0 48.7 51.0 Schedutil 47.0 49.0 52.0 Powersave 34.0 35.2 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 49.0 64.5 70.0 Ondemand 49.0 64.3 69.0 Conservative 51.0 62.4 68.0 Schedutil 48.0 64.5 72.0 Powersave 36.0 36.9 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Crop Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 8.79 / Avg: 8.84 / Max: 8.93 Min: 9.05 / Avg: 9.11 / Max: 9.28 Min: 9.56 / Avg: 9.69 / Max: 9.81 Min: 9.05 / Avg: 9.15 / Max: 9.3 Min: 23.59 / Avg: 23.69 / Max: 23.87
DaCapo Benchmark This test runs the DaCapo Benchmarks written in Java and intended to test system/CPU performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 7.37, N = 6 SE +/- 54.71, N = 6 SE +/- 54.63, N = 6 SE +/- 27.78, N = 6 SE +/- 80.36, N = 4 4938 5156 5355 5150 13156 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 8.8 19.1 Ondemand 1.8 9.1 18.5 Conservative 1.9 8.6 18.6 Schedutil 1.7 8.9 18.0 Powersave 1.8 4.0 5.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 48 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 50 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 50 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 49 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 43 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 49.0 65.3 71.6 Ondemand 47.4 63.9 70.3 Conservative 52.8 64.1 73.5 Schedutil 47.9 64.1 72.8 Powersave 35.8 37.2 38.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 48.0 51.0 55.0 Ondemand 46.0 50.3 55.0 Conservative 46.0 50.0 55.0 Schedutil 46.0 50.4 54.0 Powersave 34.0 35.3 36.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 48.0 64.7 72.0 Ondemand 47.0 63.4 70.0 Conservative 52.0 63.7 73.0 Schedutil 47.0 63.6 73.0 Powersave 35.0 36.8 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K Min: 4908 / Avg: 4937.83 / Max: 4957 Min: 5067 / Avg: 5155.83 / Max: 5420 Min: 5221 / Avg: 5355.33 / Max: 5574 Min: 5063 / Avg: 5150.17 / Max: 5266 Min: 13005 / Avg: 13155.75 / Max: 13363
Basis Universal Basis Universal is a GPU texture codoec. This test times how long it takes to convert sRGB PNGs into Basis Univeral assets with various settings. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 0 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.005, N = 5 SE +/- 0.007, N = 5 SE +/- 0.003, N = 5 SE +/- 0.004, N = 5 SE +/- 0.006, N = 3 9.089 9.097 9.173 9.111 24.212 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 8.5 28.6 Ondemand 1.9 8.4 28.3 Conservative 1.7 8.4 28.6 Schedutil 1.7 8.3 28.6 Powersave 1.6 3.9 6.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 56 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 55 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 57 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 55 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 56 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 62.9 75.3 81.4 Ondemand 62.1 72.9 79.4 Conservative 62.3 74.5 81.5 Schedutil 60.9 73.3 80.0 Powersave 35.8 37.0 38.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 55.0 57.2 62.0 Ondemand 54.0 56.8 63.0 Conservative 55.0 57.4 63.0 Schedutil 53.0 56.8 62.0 Powersave 34.0 34.8 36.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 63.0 74.6 81.0 Ondemand 62.0 72.3 79.0 Conservative 62.0 73.9 81.0 Schedutil 60.0 73.2 80.0 Powersave 35.0 36.6 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 0 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 9.08 / Avg: 9.09 / Max: 9.11 Min: 9.09 / Avg: 9.1 / Max: 9.12 Min: 9.16 / Avg: 9.17 / Max: 9.18 Min: 9.1 / Avg: 9.11 / Max: 9.12 Min: 24.2 / Avg: 24.21 / Max: 24.22 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread
Tesseract OCR Tesseract-OCR is the open-source optical character recognition (OCR) engine for the conversion of text within images to raw text output. This test profile relies upon a system-supplied Tesseract installation. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 Time To OCR 7 Images Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 25.07 25.60 25.57 25.22 66.30 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Ondemand 1.7 7.2 11.4 Conservative 1.5 7.2 11.7 Schedutil 1.7 7.3 11.5 Powersave 1.8 3.7 5.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 108 Joules per run. 2. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 110 Joules per run. 3. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 108 Joules per run. 4. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 129 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 42.4 58.5 66.3 Conservative 43.0 59.6 69.8 Schedutil 42.0 58.8 64.5 Powersave 35.0 38.2 40.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 41.0 45.0 49.0 Conservative 42.0 45.7 49.0 Schedutil 41.0 45.0 50.0 Powersave 33.0 36.6 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 System Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 42.0 58.0 64.0 Conservative 42.0 58.8 69.0 Schedutil 42.0 58.5 65.0 Powersave 35.0 37.7 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 Time To OCR 7 Images Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 13 26 39 52 65 Min: 25.02 / Avg: 25.07 / Max: 25.13 Min: 25.49 / Avg: 25.6 / Max: 25.72 Min: 25.36 / Avg: 25.57 / Max: 25.71 Min: 25.17 / Avg: 25.22 / Max: 25.27 Min: 66.03 / Avg: 66.3 / Max: 66.54
Selenium This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 47.78 51.00 63.16 53.39 126.01 1. firefox 77.0.1 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 6.1 14.9 Ondemand 1.7 6.1 12.6 Conservative 1.8 5.8 11.7 Schedutil 1.7 6.1 13.4 Powersave 1.8 3.5 5.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 465 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 463 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 469 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 464 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 644 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 57.0 68.1 81.3 Ondemand 49.9 67.2 73.0 Conservative 51.0 66.0 72.5 Schedutil 51.9 66.0 71.8 Powersave 36.0 37.0 40.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 48.0 53.3 62.0 Ondemand 48.0 52.5 58.0 Conservative 47.0 52.0 58.0 Schedutil 47.0 51.4 57.0 Powersave 33.0 35.0 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 57.0 67.7 81.0 Ondemand 50.0 66.8 73.0 Conservative 51.0 65.6 72.0 Schedutil 49.0 65.6 72.0 Powersave 36.0 36.6 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 47.5 / Avg: 47.78 / Max: 48.17 Min: 50.65 / Avg: 51 / Max: 51.35 Min: 62.51 / Avg: 63.16 / Max: 64.16 Min: 53.07 / Avg: 53.39 / Max: 53.88 Min: 124.87 / Avg: 126.01 / Max: 127.1 1. firefox 77.0.1
Rodinia Rodinia is a suite focused upon accelerating compute-intensive applications with accelerators. CUDA, OpenMP, and OpenCL parallel models are supported by the included applications. This profile utilizes select OpenCL, NVIDIA CUDA and OpenMP test binaries at the moment. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.78, N = 3 SE +/- 0.57, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 1.61, N = 3 100.50 101.77 102.19 101.60 264.41 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 12.4 25.9 Ondemand 1.8 12.4 23.0 Conservative 2.0 12.3 26.9 Schedutil 1.6 12.3 25.8 Powersave 1.7 4.5 7.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 651 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 658 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 658 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 650 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 604 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 66.5 89.8 94.9 Ondemand 64.9 91.0 96.6 Conservative 68.1 90.7 96.4 Schedutil 66.1 91.5 97.9 Powersave 38.0 42.3 45.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 59.0 66.4 72.0 Ondemand 60.0 66.5 73.0 Conservative 59.0 66.5 74.0 Schedutil 60.0 66.2 73.0 Powersave 36.0 39.3 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 67.0 89.4 94.0 Ondemand 64.0 90.5 96.0 Conservative 65.0 90.3 96.0 Schedutil 66.0 91.0 98.0 Powersave 38.0 42.0 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 50 100 150 200 250 Min: 99.07 / Avg: 100.5 / Max: 101.75 Min: 100.67 / Avg: 101.77 / Max: 102.59 Min: 101.95 / Avg: 102.19 / Max: 102.66 Min: 101.33 / Avg: 101.6 / Max: 102.05 Min: 262.74 / Avg: 264.41 / Max: 267.63 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Coremark This is a test of EEMBC CoreMark processor benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 726.44, N = 3 SE +/- 936.12, N = 3 SE +/- 672.43, N = 3 SE +/- 557.02, N = 3 SE +/- 242.38, N = 3 172036.79 170271.31 169708.58 169367.62 65666.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt Iterations/Sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 11101.75 10914.83 10890.81 10739.45 16653.68 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 15.5 29.0 Ondemand 1.8 15.6 26.6 Conservative 1.7 15.6 28.0 Schedutil 1.9 15.8 24.3 Powersave 1.7 3.9 5.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Coremark 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 170 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 172 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 171 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 173 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 64 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 60.8 76.9 84.3 Ondemand 60.4 77.1 86.1 Conservative 56.5 75.5 83.6 Schedutil 63.0 78.4 86.1 Powersave 37.5 38.1 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Coremark 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 56.0 63.1 69.0 Ondemand 56.0 64.1 69.0 Conservative 55.0 62.7 68.0 Schedutil 57.0 64.7 70.0 Powersave 35.0 35.9 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Coremark 1.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 61.0 76.3 83.0 Ondemand 60.0 76.5 84.0 Conservative 56.0 75.0 83.0 Schedutil 63.0 78.0 86.0 Powersave 37.0 37.6 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Coremark 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K Min: 171074.2 / Avg: 172036.79 / Max: 173460.54 Min: 169025.99 / Avg: 170271.31 / Max: 172104.7 Min: 168563 / Avg: 169708.58 / Max: 170891.48 Min: 168255.75 / Avg: 169367.62 / Max: 169983.71 Min: 65185.51 / Avg: 65666.47 / Max: 65959.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt
Git This test measures the time needed to carry out some sample Git operations on an example, static repository that happens to be a copy of the GNOME GTK tool-kit repository. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 54.53 54.79 55.09 54.87 142.33 1. git version 2.27.0 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 5.6 6.7 Ondemand 1.6 5.8 7.1 Conservative 1.3 5.6 7.3 Schedutil 1.8 5.8 7.8 Powersave 1.8 3.6 4.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Git CPU Power Consumption Monitor 3 6 9 12 15 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 165 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 172 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 169 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 174 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 269 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 42.8 57.6 65.9 Ondemand 41.3 56.4 61.8 Conservative 41.0 56.8 67.8 Schedutil 41.0 57.0 65.8 Powersave 36.3 37.9 40.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Git CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 45.8 49.0 Ondemand 40.0 44.2 47.0 Conservative 40.0 44.5 48.0 Schedutil 40.0 44.1 48.0 Powersave 34.0 36.0 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Git GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 57.2 66.0 Ondemand 41.0 56.0 61.0 Conservative 41.0 56.5 65.0 Schedutil 41.0 56.5 66.0 Powersave 36.0 37.4 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Git System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 54.34 / Avg: 54.53 / Max: 54.76 Min: 54.75 / Avg: 54.79 / Max: 54.84 Min: 54.93 / Avg: 55.09 / Max: 55.22 Min: 54.82 / Avg: 54.87 / Max: 54.94 Min: 142.1 / Avg: 142.33 / Max: 142.53 1. git version 2.27.0
Basis Universal Basis Universal is a GPU texture codoec. This test times how long it takes to convert sRGB PNGs into Basis Univeral assets with various settings. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: ETC1S Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 63.78 64.00 64.31 63.88 165.58 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 2.0 13.1 29.8 Ondemand 2.0 12.9 29.1 Conservative 1.8 12.8 30.0 Schedutil 1.9 12.7 29.7 Powersave 1.7 4.6 7.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 445 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 439 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 440 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 431 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 395 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 66.4 88.1 95.8 Ondemand 66.0 88.5 97.5 Conservative 67.0 88.6 97.0 Schedutil 65.5 88.1 96.8 Powersave 37.3 40.7 43.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 62.0 68.1 74.0 Ondemand 62.0 68.5 72.0 Conservative 61.0 68.3 74.0 Schedutil 61.0 67.6 72.0 Powersave 35.0 38.0 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 66.0 87.7 96.0 Ondemand 66.0 87.8 97.0 Conservative 67.0 88.2 97.0 Schedutil 65.0 87.5 96.0 Powersave 37.0 40.3 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: ETC1S Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 63.62 / Avg: 63.78 / Max: 64.07 Min: 63.72 / Avg: 64 / Max: 64.28 Min: 64.03 / Avg: 64.31 / Max: 64.63 Min: 63.65 / Avg: 63.88 / Max: 64.2 Min: 165.51 / Avg: 165.58 / Max: 165.66 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread
LibreOffice Various benchmarking operations with the LibreOffice open-source office suite. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better LibreOffice Test: 20 Documents To PDF Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.033, N = 25 SE +/- 0.036, N = 25 SE +/- 0.046, N = 25 SE +/- 0.071, N = 10 SE +/- 0.167, N = 5 7.560 7.678 7.966 7.704 19.626 1. LibreOffice 6.4.4.2 40(Build:2) CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.5 4.7 7.0 Ondemand 1.6 4.6 7.0 Conservative 1.5 4.5 7.6 Schedutil 1.6 4.5 6.6 Powersave 1.6 3.3 3.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LibreOffice CPU Power Consumption Monitor 3 6 9 12 15 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 27 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 27 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 27 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 27 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 39 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.5 54.8 62.3 Ondemand 49.4 56.8 67.8 Conservative 50.6 57.6 68.8 Schedutil 50.3 59.2 68.6 Powersave 35.3 35.7 36.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LibreOffice CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 43.8 47.0 Ondemand 42.0 45.0 52.0 Conservative 43.0 45.6 51.0 Schedutil 44.0 46.5 51.0 Powersave 33.0 34.1 35.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LibreOffice GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 54.4 62.0 Ondemand 49.0 56.5 68.0 Conservative 50.0 57.3 68.0 Schedutil 50.0 58.9 69.0 Powersave 35.0 35.4 36.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LibreOffice System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better LibreOffice Test: 20 Documents To PDF Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 7.4 / Avg: 7.56 / Max: 8.3 Min: 7.54 / Avg: 7.68 / Max: 8.47 Min: 7.71 / Avg: 7.97 / Max: 8.97 Min: 7.56 / Avg: 7.7 / Max: 8.33 Min: 19.33 / Avg: 19.63 / Max: 20.28 1. LibreOffice 6.4.4.2 40(Build:2)
LevelDB LevelDB is a key-value storage library developed by Google that supports making use of Snappy for data compression and has other modern features. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.008, N = 10 SE +/- 0.013, N = 10 SE +/- 0.005, N = 10 SE +/- 0.006, N = 10 SE +/- 0.037, N = 7 2.352 2.349 2.403 2.375 6.028 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 8.1 19.7 Ondemand 1.6 8.2 19.6 Conservative 1.6 8.2 19.7 Schedutil 1.6 8.0 19.8 Powersave 1.7 4.0 5.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 27 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 26 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 27 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 26 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 20 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 43.3 53.6 60.0 Ondemand 40.4 51.4 58.8 Conservative 42.5 53.2 59.8 Schedutil 42.0 52.8 59.5 Powersave 37.5 39.4 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 46.2 51.0 Ondemand 39.0 44.4 50.0 Conservative 41.0 46.0 51.0 Schedutil 41.0 45.4 50.0 Powersave 35.0 37.7 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 43.0 53.3 60.0 Ondemand 40.0 50.8 58.0 Conservative 42.0 53.0 60.0 Schedutil 42.0 52.3 59.0 Powersave 37.0 38.9 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 System Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 Min: 2.29 / Avg: 2.35 / Max: 2.37 Min: 2.24 / Avg: 2.35 / Max: 2.39 Min: 2.39 / Avg: 2.4 / Max: 2.43 Min: 2.34 / Avg: 2.38 / Max: 2.41 Min: 5.81 / Avg: 6.03 / Max: 6.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.006, N = 10 SE +/- 0.004, N = 10 SE +/- 0.005, N = 10 SE +/- 0.016, N = 10 SE +/- 0.057, N = 7 2.347 2.347 2.388 2.388 6.019 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 8.4 20.0 Ondemand 1.7 8.1 20.0 Conservative 1.7 8.3 20.5 Schedutil 1.6 8.2 19.8 Powersave 1.8 4.0 6.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 27 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 27 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 27 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 27 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 21 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 46.3 57.5 64.6 Ondemand 45.1 56.0 62.5 Conservative 47.3 58.1 64.8 Schedutil 44.4 55.2 61.6 Powersave 36.0 37.9 39.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 48.9 53.0 Ondemand 44.0 48.2 53.0 Conservative 46.0 49.8 54.0 Schedutil 44.0 47.3 52.0 Powersave 34.0 36.1 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 46.0 56.8 64.0 Ondemand 45.0 55.4 62.0 Conservative 47.0 57.7 64.0 Schedutil 44.0 54.9 61.0 Powersave 36.0 37.5 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 Min: 2.32 / Avg: 2.35 / Max: 2.38 Min: 2.33 / Avg: 2.35 / Max: 2.37 Min: 2.36 / Avg: 2.39 / Max: 2.41 Min: 2.34 / Avg: 2.39 / Max: 2.51 Min: 5.72 / Avg: 6.02 / Max: 6.17 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
Selenium This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.87, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 84.11 77.97 64.04 71.13 32.83 1. firefox 77.0.1 Score Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 12.86 12.48 10.68 11.23 8.99 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 6.5 22.9 Ondemand 1.6 6.2 21.5 Conservative 1.8 6.0 22.3 Schedutil 1.6 6.3 22.9 Powersave 1.8 3.7 6.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 966 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 983 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 976 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 1000 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 1228 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.8 60.0 77.3 Ondemand 42.3 56.8 73.9 Conservative 41.8 56.3 74.0 Schedutil 42.0 57.0 73.1 Powersave 35.3 37.5 42.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 43.0 47.1 56.0 Ondemand 41.0 45.1 52.0 Conservative 40.0 44.8 54.0 Schedutil 41.0 45.0 53.0 Powersave 33.0 35.6 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 59.5 77.0 Ondemand 42.0 56.4 74.0 Conservative 41.0 55.8 74.0 Schedutil 42.0 56.6 73.0 Powersave 35.0 37.0 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 16 32 48 64 80 Min: 82.39 / Avg: 84.11 / Max: 85.2 Min: 77.62 / Avg: 77.97 / Max: 78.36 Min: 63.57 / Avg: 64.04 / Max: 64.56 Min: 70.48 / Avg: 71.13 / Max: 71.5 Min: 32.52 / Avg: 32.83 / Max: 33.04 1. firefox 77.0.1
SQLite Speedtest This is a benchmark of SQLite's speedtest1 benchmark program with an increased problem size of 1,000. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 1.17, N = 3 69.52 71.09 71.61 70.85 176.49 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lz -lpthread CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.5 5.9 7.4 Ondemand 1.9 5.8 7.2 Conservative 1.8 5.8 7.3 Schedutil 1.8 5.8 7.2 Powersave 1.7 3.7 4.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 3 6 9 12 15 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 219 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 220 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 222 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 216 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 332 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 61.1 68.4 76.4 Ondemand 61.9 68.0 74.8 Conservative 62.3 70.3 77.6 Schedutil 61.1 68.4 75.5 Powersave 36.3 36.8 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 51.0 54.7 60.0 Ondemand 50.0 55.0 60.0 Conservative 52.0 54.7 60.0 Schedutil 50.0 53.8 59.0 Powersave 33.0 34.9 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 61.0 67.9 76.0 Ondemand 61.0 67.6 74.0 Conservative 62.0 69.9 77.0 Schedutil 61.0 68.0 75.0 Powersave 36.0 36.4 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 68.39 / Avg: 69.52 / Max: 70.31 Min: 70.63 / Avg: 71.09 / Max: 71.41 Min: 71.32 / Avg: 71.61 / Max: 71.99 Min: 70.76 / Avg: 70.85 / Max: 70.99 Min: 175.03 / Avg: 176.49 / Max: 178.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lz -lpthread
Hugin Hugin is an open-source, cross-platform panorama photo stitcher software package. This test profile times how long it takes to run the assistant and panorama photo stitching on a set of images. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 63.97 63.98 66.69 64.45 162.09 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.5 14.9 28.1 Ondemand 1.7 14.7 29.5 Conservative 1.8 14.7 28.1 Schedutil 1.8 14.8 29.9 Powersave 1.7 4.8 8.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Hugin CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 510 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 506 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 525 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 519 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 405 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 41.5 75.4 85.9 Ondemand 42.5 75.6 87.8 Conservative 43.1 76.5 89.0 Schedutil 42.3 76.0 88.6 Powersave 36.3 40.4 42.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hugin CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 40.0 56.7 64.0 Ondemand 41.0 56.8 64.0 Conservative 41.0 57.3 64.0 Schedutil 40.0 56.3 65.0 Powersave 35.0 37.9 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hugin GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 41.0 74.9 86.0 Ondemand 42.0 75.1 87.0 Conservative 43.0 76.0 89.0 Schedutil 42.0 75.6 89.0 Powersave 36.0 40.1 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hugin System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 63.26 / Avg: 63.97 / Max: 64.61 Min: 63.6 / Avg: 63.98 / Max: 64.22 Min: 66.41 / Avg: 66.69 / Max: 67.16 Min: 64.34 / Avg: 64.45 / Max: 64.59 Min: 160.31 / Avg: 162.09 / Max: 164.19
GIMP GIMP is an open-source image manipulaton program. This test profile will use the system-provided GIMP program otherwise on Windows relys upon a pre-packaged Windows binary from upstream GIMP.org. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 Test: resize Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.044, N = 4 SE +/- 0.028, N = 4 SE +/- 0.093, N = 4 SE +/- 0.051, N = 4 SE +/- 0.040, N = 3 9.241 10.759 12.649 12.098 23.246 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Ondemand 1.8 8.7 16.0 Conservative 1.8 7.3 11.9 Schedutil 1.8 7.3 12.9 Powersave 1.9 4.0 6.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 78 Joules per run. 2. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 73 Joules per run. 3. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 71 Joules per run. 4. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 70 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 45.3 64.1 73.0 Conservative 45.3 62.9 70.5 Schedutil 45.1 61.8 70.5 Powersave 35.0 37.9 40.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 44.0 48.2 53.0 Conservative 44.0 47.1 52.0 Schedutil 44.0 46.4 49.0 Powersave 33.0 35.6 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 45.0 63.7 73.0 Conservative 45.0 62.2 70.0 Schedutil 45.0 61.0 69.0 Powersave 35.0 37.5 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 Test: resize Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 9.17 / Avg: 9.24 / Max: 9.36 Min: 10.69 / Avg: 10.76 / Max: 10.82 Min: 12.37 / Avg: 12.65 / Max: 12.75 Min: 12.01 / Avg: 12.1 / Max: 12.25 Min: 23.18 / Avg: 23.25 / Max: 23.32
OpenVKL OpenVKL is the Intel Open Volume Kernel Library that offers high-performance volume computation kernels and part of the Intel oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Items / Sec, More Is Better OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.48, N = 13 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 5 60.28 58.50 51.19 57.78 24.05 MIN: 1 / MAX: 215 MIN: 1 / MAX: 211 MIN: 1 / MAX: 202 MIN: 1 / MAX: 206 MIN: 1 / MAX: 83 Items / Sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Items / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 1.1993 2.3986 3.5979 4.7972 5.9965 4.49 4.38 3.96 4.38 5.33 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 13.4 28.5 Ondemand 2.0 13.4 27.5 Conservative 1.5 12.9 29.9 Schedutil 2.0 13.2 27.7 Powersave 1.4 4.5 7.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 762 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 766 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 754 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 756 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 581 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 66.8 87.4 97.1 Ondemand 67.9 87.6 95.6 Conservative 66.3 87.7 97.9 Schedutil 66.5 88.8 96.8 Powersave 38.3 41.1 44.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 0.9 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 62.0 68.8 74.0 Ondemand 64.0 68.3 75.0 Conservative 60.0 67.1 76.0 Schedutil 63.0 69.1 75.0 Powersave 35.0 38.5 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 0.9 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 66.0 87.0 97.0 Ondemand 66.0 87.2 95.0 Conservative 66.0 87.2 97.0 Schedutil 67.0 88.4 96.0 Powersave 38.0 40.7 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 0.9 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Items / Sec, More Is Better OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 59.75 / Avg: 60.28 / Max: 60.92 Min: 58.25 / Avg: 58.5 / Max: 58.67 Min: 45.83 / Avg: 51.19 / Max: 52.5 Min: 57.17 / Avg: 57.78 / Max: 58.83 Min: 23.58 / Avg: 24.05 / Max: 24.17
GIMP GIMP is an open-source image manipulaton program. This test profile will use the system-provided GIMP program otherwise on Windows relys upon a pre-packaged Windows binary from upstream GIMP.org. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 Test: rotate Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 SE +/- 0.02, N = 4 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 12.57 14.00 16.66 15.12 31.44 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Ondemand 1.6 4.9 6.7 Conservative 1.8 4.6 5.7 Schedutil 1.8 4.7 6.0 Powersave 1.9 3.4 3.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 3 6 9 12 15 1. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 53 Joules per run. 2. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 55 Joules per run. 3. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 53 Joules per run. 4. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 74 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 45.3 56.4 59.9 Conservative 44.3 55.7 64.0 Schedutil 44.3 54.4 60.6 Powersave 37.3 38.6 39.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 44.0 45.0 48.0 Conservative 43.0 44.1 47.0 Schedutil 42.0 43.7 45.0 Powersave 35.0 36.9 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 System Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 45.0 56.0 60.0 Conservative 44.0 55.1 62.0 Schedutil 44.0 53.7 58.0 Powersave 37.0 38.3 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 Test: rotate Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 12.54 / Avg: 12.57 / Max: 12.6 Min: 13.96 / Avg: 14 / Max: 14.05 Min: 16.43 / Avg: 16.66 / Max: 17.1 Min: 15.05 / Avg: 15.12 / Max: 15.21 Min: 31.36 / Avg: 31.44 / Max: 31.52
GEGL GEGL is the Generic Graphics Library and is the library/framework used by GIMP and other applications like GNOME Photos. This test profile times how long it takes to complete various GEGL operations on a static set of sample JPEG images. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Scale Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.012, N = 7 SE +/- 0.011, N = 6 SE +/- 0.068, N = 6 SE +/- 0.033, N = 6 SE +/- 0.037, N = 4 6.137 6.423 7.067 6.616 15.307 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 9.7 17.5 Ondemand 1.5 10.2 16.5 Conservative 1.6 7.4 12.5 Schedutil 1.6 9.1 15.2 Powersave 1.7 3.7 4.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 50 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 54 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 42 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 48 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 36 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 46.8 66.3 73.0 Ondemand 46.3 65.8 71.6 Conservative 45.5 65.0 73.1 Schedutil 45.4 64.8 75.0 Powersave 35.1 37.0 38.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 50.2 55.0 Ondemand 45.0 50.9 55.0 Conservative 44.0 48.1 53.0 Schedutil 44.0 48.7 52.0 Powersave 34.0 35.1 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 46.0 65.7 73.0 Ondemand 46.0 65.0 71.0 Conservative 45.0 64.4 71.0 Schedutil 45.0 64.1 75.0 Powersave 35.0 36.6 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GEGL System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GEGL Operation: Scale Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 4 8 12 16 20 Min: 6.1 / Avg: 6.14 / Max: 6.18 Min: 6.39 / Avg: 6.42 / Max: 6.45 Min: 6.81 / Avg: 7.07 / Max: 7.27 Min: 6.52 / Avg: 6.62 / Max: 6.75 Min: 15.24 / Avg: 15.31 / Max: 15.39
GIMP GIMP is an open-source image manipulaton program. This test profile will use the system-provided GIMP program otherwise on Windows relys upon a pre-packaged Windows binary from upstream GIMP.org. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 Test: auto-levels Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 12.98 14.53 16.90 16.12 32.31 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Ondemand 1.7 6.5 9.6 Conservative 1.5 5.9 8.7 Schedutil 1.6 5.8 7.8 Powersave 1.7 3.6 4.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4.42 8.84 13.26 17.68 22.1 1. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 71 Joules per run. 2. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 73 Joules per run. 3. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 70 Joules per run. 4. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 78 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 42.5 58.2 66.9 Conservative 42.3 58.0 65.8 Schedutil 42.0 58.2 67.4 Powersave 37.6 39.8 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 41.0 44.2 47.0 Conservative 41.0 44.1 48.0 Schedutil 41.0 43.8 47.0 Powersave 35.0 37.7 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 System Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 42.0 57.8 67.0 Conservative 42.0 57.7 66.0 Schedutil 41.0 57.4 67.0 Powersave 37.0 39.4 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 Test: auto-levels Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 12.94 / Avg: 12.98 / Max: 13.01 Min: 14.48 / Avg: 14.53 / Max: 14.58 Min: 16.84 / Avg: 16.9 / Max: 17.01 Min: 16.02 / Avg: 16.12 / Max: 16.2 Min: 32.27 / Avg: 32.31 / Max: 32.36
OCRMyPDF OCRMyPDF is an optical character recognition (OCR) text layer to scanned PDF files, producing new PDFs with the text now selectable/searchable/copy-paste capable. OCRMyPDF leverages the Tesseract OCR engine and is written in Python. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OCRMyPDF 9.8.0+dfsg Processing 60 Page PDF Document Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 48.70 49.14 49.79 49.15 121.11 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Ondemand 1.7 16.0 29.6 Conservative 1.8 16.0 30.1 Schedutil 1.6 16.1 29.7 Powersave 1.7 5.5 7.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OCRMyPDF 9.8.0+dfsg CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 427 Joules per run. 2. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 433 Joules per run. 3. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 428 Joules per run. 4. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 345 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 41.3 72.2 87.9 Conservative 42.3 72.1 90.3 Schedutil 42.8 74.2 93.4 Powersave 34.9 41.0 43.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OCRMyPDF 9.8.0+dfsg CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 40.0 56.0 65.0 Conservative 41.0 57.0 66.0 Schedutil 41.0 57.2 66.0 Powersave 33.0 38.4 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OCRMyPDF 9.8.0+dfsg GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 41.0 71.8 88.0 Conservative 42.0 71.7 90.0 Schedutil 42.0 73.8 94.0 Powersave 34.0 40.6 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OCRMyPDF 9.8.0+dfsg System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OCRMyPDF 9.8.0+dfsg Processing 60 Page PDF Document Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 48.43 / Avg: 48.7 / Max: 48.95 Min: 48.98 / Avg: 49.14 / Max: 49.39 Min: 49.57 / Avg: 49.79 / Max: 50.07 Min: 48.87 / Avg: 49.14 / Max: 49.37 Min: 120.85 / Avg: 121.11 / Max: 121.35
libavif avifenc This is a test of the AOMedia libavif library testing the encoding of a JPEG image to AV1 Image Format (AVIF). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 10 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.006, N = 7 SE +/- 0.011, N = 6 SE +/- 0.007, N = 6 SE +/- 0.005, N = 6 SE +/- 0.014, N = 4 6.300 6.379 6.467 6.512 15.547 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 9.1 29.9 Ondemand 1.7 9.2 29.0 Conservative 1.7 9.0 29.7 Schedutil 1.5 9.2 30.1 Powersave 1.6 4.0 7.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 47 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 47 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 48 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 49 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 44 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 53.5 70.5 76.0 Ondemand 54.3 71.7 76.8 Conservative 58.8 72.8 77.3 Schedutil 54.3 71.5 77.5 Powersave 36.3 38.0 40.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 52.0 55.3 60.0 Ondemand 53.0 55.9 60.0 Conservative 53.0 56.2 61.0 Schedutil 53.0 55.9 61.0 Powersave 34.0 35.9 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 53.0 69.8 75.0 Ondemand 54.0 71.1 76.0 Conservative 59.0 72.1 77.0 Schedutil 54.0 71.1 77.0 Powersave 36.0 37.6 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 10 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 4 8 12 16 20 Min: 6.27 / Avg: 6.3 / Max: 6.32 Min: 6.35 / Avg: 6.38 / Max: 6.42 Min: 6.45 / Avg: 6.47 / Max: 6.5 Min: 6.5 / Avg: 6.51 / Max: 6.53 Min: 15.51 / Avg: 15.55 / Max: 15.57 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC
LevelDB LevelDB is a key-value storage library developed by Google that supports making use of Snappy for data compression and has other modern features. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.02, N = 5 SE +/- 0.09, N = 4 SE +/- 0.29, N = 4 SE +/- 0.22, N = 5 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 17.11 31.82 29.61 21.45 41.84 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 11.5 17.3 Ondemand 1.8 5.3 6.9 Conservative 1.7 8.3 14.5 Schedutil 1.6 10.7 15.3 Powersave 1.8 4.7 5.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 76 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 55 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 81 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 79 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 59 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 48.5 63.2 69.3 Ondemand 42.1 50.1 56.6 Conservative 46.5 58.8 68.4 Schedutil 46.9 62.9 70.9 Powersave 36.3 37.7 38.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 47.0 52.5 57.0 Ondemand 40.0 43.0 44.0 Conservative 45.0 49.6 52.0 Schedutil 46.0 51.3 55.0 Powersave 34.0 36.0 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 48.0 62.7 67.0 Ondemand 42.0 49.5 56.0 Conservative 46.0 57.8 66.0 Schedutil 46.0 62.4 71.0 Powersave 36.0 37.3 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 17.05 / Avg: 17.1 / Max: 17.16 Min: 31.57 / Avg: 31.82 / Max: 31.99 Min: 29.09 / Avg: 29.61 / Max: 30.44 Min: 20.73 / Avg: 21.45 / Max: 22.09 Min: 41.77 / Avg: 41.84 / Max: 41.98 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
SVT-AV1 This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-AV1 CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the AV1 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.0164 0.0328 0.0492 0.0656 0.082 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.073 0.072 0.071 0.072 0.030 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 17.4 26.9 Ondemand 2.0 17.2 25.5 Conservative 2.0 17.2 25.9 Schedutil 2.0 17.4 26.8 Powersave 1.7 5.5 8.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 2423 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 2425 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 2460 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 2448 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 1833 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 65.8 93.0 101.3 Ondemand 66.0 93.0 101.0 Conservative 66.3 92.3 101.5 Schedutil 66.9 92.6 101.0 Powersave 40.8 43.7 46.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 64.0 72.5 77.0 Ondemand 65.0 72.7 77.0 Conservative 65.0 73.1 78.0 Schedutil 65.0 73.1 77.0 Powersave 37.0 41.1 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 65.0 92.6 101.0 Ondemand 66.0 92.6 101.0 Conservative 66.0 91.9 101.0 Schedutil 65.0 92.2 101.0 Powersave 40.0 43.3 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 1 2 3 4 5 Min: 0.07 / Avg: 0.07 / Max: 0.07 Min: 0.07 / Avg: 0.07 / Max: 0.07 Min: 0.07 / Avg: 0.07 / Max: 0.07 Min: 0.07 / Avg: 0.07 / Max: 0.07 Min: 0.03 / Avg: 0.03 / Max: 0.03 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
Basis Universal Basis Universal is a GPU texture codoec. This test times how long it takes to convert sRGB PNGs into Basis Univeral assets with various settings. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 57.01 57.00 57.31 56.97 138.48 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 19.1 29.9 Ondemand 1.8 19.0 30.0 Conservative 1.8 19.0 29.7 Schedutil 1.7 19.0 26.3 Powersave 1.8 6.2 7.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 585 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 583 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 590 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 581 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 442 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 51.6 82.6 98.0 Ondemand 51.3 82.3 95.5 Conservative 52.3 84.0 97.8 Schedutil 50.6 82.5 94.1 Powersave 35.1 41.5 43.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 51.0 67.7 73.0 Ondemand 50.0 67.5 73.0 Conservative 51.0 68.1 74.0 Schedutil 50.0 67.2 73.0 Powersave 33.0 39.1 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 51.0 82.1 95.0 Ondemand 51.0 82.0 96.0 Conservative 51.0 83.4 97.0 Schedutil 50.0 81.9 94.0 Powersave 35.0 41.1 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 56.14 / Avg: 57.01 / Max: 57.7 Min: 56.17 / Avg: 57 / Max: 57.62 Min: 56.4 / Avg: 57.31 / Max: 58.06 Min: 56.17 / Avg: 56.97 / Max: 57.57 Min: 138.45 / Avg: 138.48 / Max: 138.51 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread
libavif avifenc This is a test of the AOMedia libavif library testing the encoding of a JPEG image to AV1 Image Format (AVIF). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 8 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.007, N = 6 SE +/- 0.011, N = 6 SE +/- 0.015, N = 6 SE +/- 0.008, N = 6 SE +/- 0.012, N = 3 6.905 6.960 7.059 7.098 16.768 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 9.5 28.5 Ondemand 1.9 9.8 29.8 Conservative 1.8 9.5 25.5 Schedutil 1.7 9.8 30.1 Powersave 1.6 4.0 7.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 52 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 54 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 54 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 55 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 49 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 64.5 76.3 85.5 Ondemand 65.0 77.4 82.0 Conservative 65.1 78.0 86.4 Schedutil 65.0 78.4 87.8 Powersave 37.1 38.7 40.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 58.0 60.6 65.0 Ondemand 58.0 61.0 67.0 Conservative 58.0 61.1 66.0 Schedutil 57.0 60.9 68.0 Powersave 35.0 36.6 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 64.0 76.1 85.0 Ondemand 65.0 76.8 82.0 Conservative 65.0 77.9 87.0 Schedutil 65.0 77.9 86.0 Powersave 37.0 38.3 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 8 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 4 8 12 16 20 Min: 6.88 / Avg: 6.91 / Max: 6.93 Min: 6.93 / Avg: 6.96 / Max: 7 Min: 7.01 / Avg: 7.06 / Max: 7.11 Min: 7.08 / Avg: 7.1 / Max: 7.12 Min: 16.75 / Avg: 16.77 / Max: 16.78 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC
PostMark This is a test of NetApp's PostMark benchmark designed to simulate small-file testing similar to the tasks endured by web and mail servers. This test profile will set PostMark to perform 25,000 transactions with 500 files simultaneously with the file sizes ranging between 5 and 512 kilobytes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 62.67, N = 3 SE +/- 62.67, N = 3 SE +/- 62.67, N = 3 SE +/- 18.76, N = 3 6819 6819 6756 6881 2840 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 TPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS Per Watt, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 200 400 600 800 1000 1124.70 1058.32 1096.90 1113.25 779.13 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.5 6.1 7.2 Ondemand 1.7 6.4 8.0 Conservative 1.6 6.2 7.4 Schedutil 1.8 6.2 7.9 Powersave 1.7 3.6 4.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PostMark 1.51 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 3 6 9 12 15 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 123 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 133 Joules per run. 3. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 126 Joules per run. 4. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 168 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 35.0 51.1 54.3 Ondemand 34.5 49.5 53.3 Conservative 36.5 53.4 58.3 Schedutil 36.3 52.2 56.1 Powersave 35.3 38.9 40.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PostMark 1.51 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 34.0 41.8 46.0 Ondemand 32.0 40.6 44.0 Conservative 34.0 42.9 46.0 Schedutil 35.0 43.0 47.0 Powersave 33.0 37.3 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PostMark 1.51 GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 35.0 50.7 54.0 Ondemand 34.0 49.1 53.0 Conservative 36.0 53.0 58.0 Schedutil 36.0 51.8 56.0 Powersave 35.0 38.4 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PostMark 1.51 System Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 Min: 6756 / Avg: 6818.67 / Max: 6944 Min: 6756 / Avg: 6818.67 / Max: 6944 Min: 6756 / Avg: 6881.33 / Max: 6944 Min: 2808 / Avg: 2840.33 / Max: 2873 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
GIMP GIMP is an open-source image manipulaton program. This test profile will use the system-provided GIMP program otherwise on Windows relys upon a pre-packaged Windows binary from upstream GIMP.org. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 Test: unsharp-mask Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 15.09 16.69 18.42 17.92 36.33 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Ondemand 1.6 7.5 11.0 Conservative 1.8 7.0 10.7 Schedutil 1.6 7.0 10.0 Powersave 1.9 3.8 5.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 90 Joules per run. 2. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 93 Joules per run. 3. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 89 Joules per run. 4. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 90 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 43.3 57.3 61.0 Conservative 43.5 58.0 65.9 Schedutil 42.6 57.5 66.3 Powersave 38.1 40.1 41.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 41.0 45.6 50.0 Conservative 42.0 45.8 50.0 Schedutil 41.0 45.1 50.0 Powersave 35.0 37.9 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 System Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 43.0 56.3 60.0 Conservative 43.0 57.6 66.0 Schedutil 42.0 57.2 66.0 Powersave 38.0 39.7 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GIMP 2.10.18 Test: unsharp-mask Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 15.04 / Avg: 15.09 / Max: 15.13 Min: 16.6 / Avg: 16.69 / Max: 16.82 Min: 18.2 / Avg: 18.42 / Max: 18.53 Min: 17.82 / Avg: 17.92 / Max: 18.04 Min: 36.3 / Avg: 36.33 / Max: 36.36
Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool NEAT is the Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool for empirical analysis of ionised nebulae, with uncertainty propagation. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 29.16 29.28 29.57 29.31 69.89 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -ffree-line-length-0 -Jsource/ -fopenmp -O3 -fno-backtrace CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 14.8 27.4 Ondemand 2.0 14.9 28.5 Conservative 1.6 14.4 28.4 Schedutil 1.3 14.5 29.3 Powersave 1.6 5.0 7.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 247 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 249 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 245 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 246 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 186 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 68.3 87.2 95.4 Ondemand 67.1 87.7 97.5 Conservative 66.5 89.0 96.6 Schedutil 66.9 88.3 95.8 Powersave 39.3 42.5 44.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 65.0 69.2 73.0 Ondemand 64.0 69.4 73.0 Conservative 64.0 69.4 73.0 Schedutil 63.0 69.0 72.0 Powersave 38.0 40.1 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 68.0 86.7 95.0 Ondemand 67.0 87.2 97.0 Conservative 67.0 88.4 96.0 Schedutil 67.0 87.8 95.0 Powersave 39.0 42.1 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 14 28 42 56 70 Min: 29.04 / Avg: 29.16 / Max: 29.27 Min: 29.15 / Avg: 29.28 / Max: 29.4 Min: 29.33 / Avg: 29.57 / Max: 29.71 Min: 29.18 / Avg: 29.31 / Max: 29.4 Min: 69.61 / Avg: 69.89 / Max: 70.25 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -ffree-line-length-0 -Jsource/ -fopenmp -O3 -fno-backtrace
CP2K Molecular Dynamics CP2K is an open-source molecular dynamics software package focused on quantum chemistry and solid-state physics. This test profile currently makes use of the OpenMP implementation and using the Fayalite-FIST molecular dynamics run and measures the total time to complete. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Timed Apache Compilation This test times how long it takes to build the Apache HTTPD web server. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 30.27 32.33 35.15 32.27 72.11 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 14.2 28.0 Ondemand 1.8 12.7 29.7 Conservative 1.8 11.5 29.9 Schedutil 1.8 12.6 29.3 Powersave 1.6 5.0 8.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 297 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 304 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 305 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 299 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 239 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 51.1 77.5 95.1 Ondemand 51.4 72.7 91.8 Conservative 48.8 69.7 90.5 Schedutil 50.6 74.1 92.4 Powersave 36.0 40.7 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 50.0 60.4 70.0 Ondemand 48.0 58.3 69.0 Conservative 48.0 56.6 67.0 Schedutil 49.0 58.6 69.0 Powersave 34.0 38.5 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 51.0 76.7 92.0 Ondemand 51.0 72.4 92.0 Conservative 48.0 69.5 90.0 Schedutil 51.0 73.4 91.0 Powersave 36.0 40.3 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 14 28 42 56 70 Min: 30.09 / Avg: 30.27 / Max: 30.45 Min: 32.16 / Avg: 32.33 / Max: 32.53 Min: 34.72 / Avg: 35.15 / Max: 35.52 Min: 32.25 / Avg: 32.27 / Max: 32.29 Min: 72.05 / Avg: 72.11 / Max: 72.16
Selenium This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Runs Per Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 66.6 62.5 53.8 64.1 28.3 1. firefox 77.0.1 Runs Per Minute Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Runs Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 10.28 10.37 10.06 10.86 7.58 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 6.5 13.6 Ondemand 1.8 6.0 11.2 Conservative 1.5 5.3 10.7 Schedutil 1.7 5.9 12.6 Powersave 1.8 3.7 5.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 372 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 376 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 390 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 374 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 436 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 41.3 55.5 67.0 Ondemand 39.5 52.4 63.9 Conservative 39.3 50.0 61.9 Schedutil 39.9 53.0 67.9 Powersave 34.9 37.6 40.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 40.0 46.4 51.0 Ondemand 38.0 44.4 50.0 Conservative 37.0 43.0 47.0 Schedutil 38.0 44.5 49.0 Powersave 33.0 35.7 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 41.0 54.9 67.0 Ondemand 39.0 52.0 62.0 Conservative 39.0 49.5 61.0 Schedutil 39.0 52.5 68.0 Powersave 34.0 37.2 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Runs Per Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 13 26 39 52 65 Min: 66.2 / Avg: 66.63 / Max: 67.1 Min: 62.3 / Avg: 62.47 / Max: 62.6 Min: 53.2 / Avg: 53.83 / Max: 54.5 Min: 64 / Avg: 64.1 / Max: 64.2 Min: 28.2 / Avg: 28.33 / Max: 28.5 1. firefox 77.0.1
LevelDB LevelDB is a key-value storage library developed by Google that supports making use of Snappy for data compression and has other modern features. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.009, N = 9 SE +/- 0.004, N = 9 SE +/- 0.004, N = 9 SE +/- 0.010, N = 9 SE +/- 0.077, N = 6 3.180 3.185 3.204 3.214 7.436 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.5 9.9 21.6 Ondemand 1.5 10.1 21.4 Conservative 1.5 9.7 22.2 Schedutil 1.5 9.9 21.7 Powersave 1.7 4.1 5.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 36 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 37 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 37 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 37 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 24 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.8 57.7 65.1 Ondemand 43.6 55.7 62.9 Conservative 44.5 57.5 65.3 Schedutil 44.3 56.6 63.3 Powersave 37.4 38.3 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 48.7 54.0 Ondemand 43.0 47.8 52.0 Conservative 43.0 48.6 55.0 Schedutil 43.0 47.9 53.0 Powersave 35.0 36.3 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 57.3 65.0 Ondemand 43.0 55.3 63.0 Conservative 44.0 57.0 65.0 Schedutil 44.0 56.2 63.0 Powersave 37.0 37.8 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 Min: 3.15 / Avg: 3.18 / Max: 3.24 Min: 3.17 / Avg: 3.19 / Max: 3.2 Min: 3.18 / Avg: 3.2 / Max: 3.22 Min: 3.18 / Avg: 3.21 / Max: 3.26 Min: 7.34 / Avg: 7.44 / Max: 7.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
RawTherapee RawTherapee is a cross-platform, open-source multi-threaded RAW image processing program. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 85.43 86.90 91.07 88.40 198.05 1. RawTherapee, version 5.8, command line. CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 18.8 24.8 Ondemand 1.8 18.7 25.1 Conservative 1.9 18.2 26.1 Schedutil 1.7 18.6 25.1 Powersave 1.8 5.7 8.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 852 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 868 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 881 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 876 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 583 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.3 82.7 96.0 Ondemand 44.3 82.5 96.9 Conservative 45.0 83.8 97.9 Schedutil 44.6 84.3 100.8 Powersave 35.3 41.9 43.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 43.0 64.6 72.0 Ondemand 43.0 64.5 72.0 Conservative 44.0 65.0 72.0 Schedutil 43.0 64.7 73.0 Powersave 33.0 39.4 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 82.2 96.0 Ondemand 44.0 82.1 96.0 Conservative 45.0 83.3 96.0 Schedutil 44.0 83.8 98.0 Powersave 35.0 41.5 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 84.55 / Avg: 85.43 / Max: 86.17 Min: 85.89 / Avg: 86.9 / Max: 87.41 Min: 90 / Avg: 91.07 / Max: 91.83 Min: 87.47 / Avg: 88.4 / Max: 89.17 Min: 197.94 / Avg: 198.05 / Max: 198.19 1. RawTherapee, version 5.8, command line.
LuxCoreRender LuxCoreRender is an open-source physically based renderer. This test profile is focused on running LuxCoreRender on the CPU as opposed to the OpenCL version. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.1868 0.3736 0.5604 0.7472 0.934 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.83 0.82 0.81 0.82 0.36 MIN: 0.79 / MAX: 0.94 MIN: 0.78 / MAX: 0.93 MIN: 0.77 / MAX: 0.91 MIN: 0.78 / MAX: 0.96 MIN: 0.35 / MAX: 0.41 M samples/sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.0135 0.027 0.0405 0.054 0.0675 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.06 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 20.0 24.6 Ondemand 2.0 20.4 29.9 Conservative 2.0 19.9 24.9 Schedutil 2.0 20.0 26.0 Powersave 1.7 6.5 7.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 667 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 674 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 665 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 668 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 216 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 65.3 88.6 93.3 Ondemand 64.1 89.6 93.8 Conservative 64.3 89.5 93.8 Schedutil 64.3 89.8 93.3 Powersave 40.0 43.7 44.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 63.0 73.0 76.0 Ondemand 62.0 73.2 76.0 Conservative 62.0 73.4 77.0 Schedutil 63.0 73.5 77.0 Powersave 39.0 41.3 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 63.0 88.0 93.0 Ondemand 64.0 89.3 93.0 Conservative 64.0 89.0 93.0 Schedutil 64.0 89.3 93.0 Powersave 40.0 43.3 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 Min: 0.82 / Avg: 0.83 / Max: 0.84 Min: 0.81 / Avg: 0.82 / Max: 0.83 Min: 0.8 / Avg: 0.81 / Max: 0.82 Min: 0.81 / Avg: 0.82 / Max: 0.84 Min: 0.36 / Avg: 0.36 / Max: 0.37
SVT-AV1 This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-AV1 CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the AV1 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.061, N = 3 SE +/- 0.069, N = 3 SE +/- 0.083, N = 3 SE +/- 0.078, N = 3 SE +/- 0.005, N = 3 11.125 10.751 10.592 10.669 4.827 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.189 0.378 0.567 0.756 0.945 0.59 0.57 0.56 0.56 0.84 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 19.0 23.8 Ondemand 2.0 18.8 24.4 Conservative 2.0 18.8 24.7 Schedutil 1.8 19.0 24.6 Powersave 1.8 5.8 6.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 323 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 326 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 326 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 329 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 208 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 72.8 93.1 103.1 Ondemand 66.5 92.6 101.6 Conservative 66.3 93.3 101.9 Schedutil 64.6 92.4 100.0 Powersave 41.5 44.3 45.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 64.0 71.3 76.0 Ondemand 64.0 72.0 76.0 Conservative 65.0 73.0 76.0 Schedutil 63.0 71.5 75.0 Powersave 40.0 41.9 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 72.0 92.9 103.0 Ondemand 67.0 91.7 100.0 Conservative 66.0 92.6 101.0 Schedutil 64.0 92.0 100.0 Powersave 41.0 43.9 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 Min: 11.04 / Avg: 11.12 / Max: 11.24 Min: 10.64 / Avg: 10.75 / Max: 10.88 Min: 10.47 / Avg: 10.59 / Max: 10.75 Min: 10.57 / Avg: 10.67 / Max: 10.82 Min: 4.82 / Avg: 4.83 / Max: 4.83 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
libavif avifenc This is a test of the AOMedia libavif library testing the encoding of a JPEG image to AV1 Image Format (AVIF). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 2 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 SE +/- 0.59, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 95.21 95.62 95.76 98.91 219.30 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 2.0 18.3 23.0 Ondemand 1.9 18.5 30.0 Conservative 1.7 18.0 26.5 Schedutil 2.0 18.3 28.4 Powersave 1.7 6.2 8.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 909 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 919 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 902 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 940 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 700 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 65.4 88.8 100.0 Ondemand 62.6 89.3 97.6 Conservative 64.5 89.0 95.6 Schedutil 62.3 89.4 101.5 Powersave 37.5 43.8 46.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 58.0 72.2 76.0 Ondemand 57.0 72.2 77.0 Conservative 59.0 72.4 76.0 Schedutil 57.0 72.5 77.0 Powersave 35.0 41.3 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 65.0 88.3 97.0 Ondemand 62.0 88.9 97.0 Conservative 61.0 88.4 96.0 Schedutil 62.0 88.9 99.0 Powersave 37.0 43.4 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 2 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 94.43 / Avg: 95.21 / Max: 95.65 Min: 94.64 / Avg: 95.62 / Max: 96.19 Min: 94.66 / Avg: 95.76 / Max: 96.7 Min: 97.81 / Avg: 98.91 / Max: 99.77 Min: 218.86 / Avg: 219.3 / Max: 219.84 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC
OSPray Intel OSPray is a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidenlity scientific visualizations. OSPray builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 1.2848 2.5696 3.8544 5.1392 6.424 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 5.71 5.66 5.56 5.64 2.49 MIN: 5.26 / MAX: 6.02 MIN: 5.29 / MAX: 5.99 MIN: 5.15 / MAX: 5.88 MIN: 5.1 / MAX: 5.92 MIN: 2.44 / MAX: 2.64 FPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.1013 0.2026 0.3039 0.4052 0.5065 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.38 0.45 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 14.9 29.2 Ondemand 1.8 14.8 29.0 Conservative 1.8 15.1 29.7 Schedutil 1.8 15.0 22.8 Powersave 1.6 5.5 7.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 506 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 510 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 520 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 514 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 442 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.8 72.1 81.1 Ondemand 47.5 73.1 79.0 Conservative 51.9 77.0 90.3 Schedutil 51.3 76.3 89.9 Powersave 37.3 42.1 45.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 57.5 68.0 Ondemand 47.0 58.5 69.0 Conservative 51.0 62.5 71.0 Schedutil 50.0 61.4 70.0 Powersave 35.0 39.7 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 71.7 81.0 Ondemand 47.0 72.7 79.0 Conservative 52.0 76.5 87.0 Schedutil 51.0 75.7 90.0 Powersave 37.0 41.7 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 Min: 5.68 / Avg: 5.71 / Max: 5.75 Min: 5.62 / Avg: 5.66 / Max: 5.71 Min: 5.52 / Avg: 5.56 / Max: 5.62 Min: 5.62 / Avg: 5.64 / Max: 5.68 Min: 2.49 / Avg: 2.49 / Max: 2.49
libavif avifenc This is a test of the AOMedia libavif library testing the encoding of a JPEG image to AV1 Image Format (AVIF). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 0 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 SE +/- 0.95, N = 3 161.74 162.44 163.30 166.90 370.72 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 18.5 26.8 Ondemand 2.0 18.5 30.0 Conservative 2.0 18.2 29.0 Schedutil 1.7 18.4 28.3 Powersave 1.5 6.3 8.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 1539 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 1543 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 1527 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 1573 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 1182 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 63.4 90.1 95.3 Ondemand 64.3 90.3 95.0 Conservative 64.9 90.5 95.8 Schedutil 64.1 90.7 99.9 Powersave 38.0 44.5 46.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 62.0 73.0 77.0 Ondemand 62.0 73.4 77.0 Conservative 63.0 73.7 77.0 Schedutil 62.0 73.6 77.0 Powersave 37.0 41.9 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 63.0 89.4 95.0 Ondemand 64.0 89.7 95.0 Conservative 65.0 90.0 96.0 Schedutil 64.0 90.2 100.0 Powersave 38.0 44.0 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 0 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 161.26 / Avg: 161.74 / Max: 162.34 Min: 161.59 / Avg: 162.44 / Max: 163.35 Min: 163.02 / Avg: 163.3 / Max: 163.67 Min: 166.43 / Avg: 166.9 / Max: 167.76 Min: 368.87 / Avg: 370.72 / Max: 372.03 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC
dav1d Dav1d is an open-source, speedy AV1 video decoder. This test profile times how long it takes to decode sample AV1 video content. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 87.50 78.63 83.90 74.48 38.24 MIN: 60.05 / MAX: 189.44 MIN: 53.4 / MAX: 172.7 MIN: 57.75 / MAX: 163.88 MIN: 49.46 / MAX: 168.57 MIN: 25.75 / MAX: 84.91 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread FPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 11.55 8.29 5.61 5.06 8.06 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 1.69 / Avg: 7.58 / Max: 28.54 Min: 1.81 / Avg: 9.49 / Max: 28.71 Min: 1.88 / Avg: 14.95 / Max: 27.87 Min: 1.88 / Avg: 14.7 / Max: 28.98 Min: 1.76 / Avg: 4.74 / Max: 7.08 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 5566 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 4204 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 3424 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 3592 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 3521 Joules per run. CPU Temp
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 CPU Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 48 / Avg: 61.42 / Max: 99.75 Min: 52.5 / Avg: 69.18 / Max: 99.38 Min: 53.25 / Avg: 84.7 / Max: 101.38 Min: 53.38 / Avg: 83.87 / Max: 99.63 Min: 35.88 / Avg: 41.31 / Max: 44.25 GPU Temp
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 GPU Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 15 30 45 60 75 Min: 47 / Avg: 52.4 / Max: 73 Min: 49 / Avg: 57.26 / Max: 76 Min: 51 / Avg: 65.89 / Max: 76 Min: 52 / Avg: 65.2 / Max: 75 Min: 34 / Avg: 39.06 / Max: 43 System Temp
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 System Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 48 / Avg: 60.97 / Max: 100 Min: 52 / Avg: 68.76 / Max: 99 Min: 53 / Avg: 84.31 / Max: 101 Min: 54 / Avg: 83.38 / Max: 98 Min: 35 / Avg: 40.87 / Max: 44 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 87.3 / Avg: 87.5 / Max: 87.69 Min: 78.35 / Avg: 78.63 / Max: 78.86 Min: 83.6 / Avg: 83.9 / Max: 84.12 Min: 74.41 / Avg: 74.48 / Max: 74.61 Min: 38.18 / Avg: 38.24 / Max: 38.32 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
Rodinia Rodinia is a suite focused upon accelerating compute-intensive applications with accelerators. CUDA, OpenMP, and OpenCL parallel models are supported by the included applications. This profile utilizes select OpenCL, NVIDIA CUDA and OpenMP test binaries at the moment. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 1.83, N = 3 SE +/- 1.66, N = 3 SE +/- 2.26, N = 3 SE +/- 1.93, N = 3 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 208.42 210.13 210.72 209.82 475.47 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 21.0 24.2 Ondemand 1.9 21.0 25.0 Conservative 1.8 20.9 25.7 Schedutil 1.6 20.8 28.4 Powersave 1.7 6.3 7.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 2232 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 2254 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 2246 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 2227 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 1511 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 61.6 91.0 98.1 Ondemand 64.8 92.4 99.5 Conservative 63.0 92.0 100.3 Schedutil 64.6 92.1 99.4 Powersave 37.3 43.8 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 54.0 73.8 77.0 Ondemand 55.0 74.4 77.0 Conservative 53.0 74.5 78.0 Schedutil 54.0 74.3 77.0 Powersave 36.0 41.1 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 62.0 90.6 98.0 Ondemand 62.0 92.0 99.0 Conservative 63.0 91.3 99.0 Schedutil 65.0 91.5 99.0 Powersave 37.0 43.5 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 204.77 / Avg: 208.42 / Max: 210.52 Min: 206.95 / Avg: 210.13 / Max: 212.54 Min: 206.19 / Avg: 210.72 / Max: 212.99 Min: 206.01 / Avg: 209.82 / Max: 212.3 Min: 474.53 / Avg: 475.47 / Max: 477.01 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
LuxCoreRender LuxCoreRender is an open-source physically based renderer. This test profile is focused on running LuxCoreRender on the CPU as opposed to the OpenCL version. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.1643 0.3286 0.4929 0.6572 0.8215 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.72 0.72 0.73 0.72 0.32 MIN: 0.69 / MAX: 0.76 MIN: 0.69 / MAX: 0.79 MIN: 0.69 / MAX: 0.77 MIN: 0.68 / MAX: 0.79 MIN: 0.31 M samples/sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.0113 0.0226 0.0339 0.0452 0.0565 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 20.1 24.1 Ondemand 1.9 20.4 29.1 Conservative 1.9 20.5 26.5 Schedutil 1.9 20.2 28.3 Powersave 1.6 6.7 7.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 671 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 672 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 684 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 675 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 223 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 57.1 85.6 93.5 Ondemand 57.0 85.6 94.3 Conservative 56.3 84.9 92.6 Schedutil 57.9 87.0 94.9 Powersave 36.5 43.1 45.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 56.0 71.3 77.0 Ondemand 55.0 71.7 76.0 Conservative 55.0 71.6 76.0 Schedutil 57.0 72.2 76.0 Powersave 34.0 40.9 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 57.0 85.1 93.0 Ondemand 57.0 85.2 94.0 Conservative 56.0 84.5 92.0 Schedutil 58.0 86.4 94.0 Powersave 36.0 42.7 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 Min: 0.72 / Avg: 0.72 / Max: 0.73 Min: 0.71 / Avg: 0.72 / Max: 0.74 Min: 0.72 / Avg: 0.73 / Max: 0.74 Min: 0.7 / Avg: 0.72 / Max: 0.74 Min: 0.32 / Avg: 0.32 / Max: 0.32
WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test This is a benchmark of the WireGuard secure VPN tunnel and Linux networking stack stress test. The test runs on the local host but does require root permissions to run. The way it works is it creates three namespaces. ns0 has a loopback device. ns1 and ns2 each have wireguard devices. Those two wireguard devices send traffic through the loopback device of ns0. The end result of this is that tests wind up testing encryption and decryption at the same time -- a pretty CPU and scheduler-heavy workflow. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
SVT-AV1 This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-AV1 CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the AV1 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.3038 0.6076 0.9114 1.2152 1.519 SE +/- 0.012, N = 3 SE +/- 0.011, N = 3 SE +/- 0.012, N = 3 SE +/- 0.011, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 1.350 1.333 1.306 1.328 0.618 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.0203 0.0406 0.0609 0.0812 0.1015 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.09 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 20.1 23.9 Ondemand 1.9 19.9 23.5 Conservative 2.0 19.8 24.3 Schedutil 2.0 20.0 24.4 Powersave 1.8 6.7 8.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 650 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 649 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 658 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 654 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 451 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 66.4 91.8 103.5 Ondemand 64.9 91.1 98.6 Conservative 71.4 92.7 101.0 Schedutil 66.1 91.0 99.9 Powersave 39.3 45.3 46.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 60.0 73.1 77.0 Ondemand 61.0 73.5 77.0 Conservative 62.0 74.4 78.0 Schedutil 60.0 73.5 78.0 Powersave 38.0 43.0 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 66.0 91.2 102.0 Ondemand 64.0 90.8 98.0 Conservative 70.0 92.2 101.0 Schedutil 66.0 90.6 99.0 Powersave 39.0 44.9 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 Min: 1.33 / Avg: 1.35 / Max: 1.37 Min: 1.32 / Avg: 1.33 / Max: 1.35 Min: 1.29 / Avg: 1.31 / Max: 1.33 Min: 1.31 / Avg: 1.33 / Max: 1.34 Min: 0.62 / Avg: 0.62 / Max: 0.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
YafaRay YafaRay is an open-source physically based montecarlo ray-tracing engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better YafaRay 3.4.1 Total Time For Sample Scene Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 1.24, N = 3 SE +/- 0.80, N = 3 SE +/- 0.98, N = 3 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 340.48 340.90 345.53 341.56 727.50 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -O3 -ffast-math -rdynamic -ldl -lImath -lIlmImf -lIex -lHalf -lz -lIlmThread -lxml2 -lfreetype -lpthread CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 19.3 22.4 Ondemand 2.1 19.5 22.7 Conservative 1.7 18.7 28.2 Schedutil 1.9 19.3 25.7 Powersave 1.6 7.1 7.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better YafaRay 3.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 3319 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 3365 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 3265 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 3333 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 2583 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 66.4 93.0 95.8 Ondemand 66.0 93.0 96.1 Conservative 66.1 92.9 94.5 Schedutil 66.0 93.0 95.3 Powersave 42.0 45.7 46.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better YafaRay 3.4.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 65.0 75.9 78.0 Ondemand 64.0 75.9 77.0 Conservative 65.0 76.3 78.0 Schedutil 65.0 75.7 77.0 Powersave 41.0 43.0 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better YafaRay 3.4.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 66.0 92.7 96.0 Ondemand 66.0 92.8 96.0 Conservative 66.0 92.4 94.0 Schedutil 66.0 92.7 95.0 Powersave 42.0 45.2 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better YafaRay 3.4.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better YafaRay 3.4.1 Total Time For Sample Scene Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 130 260 390 520 650 Min: 340.31 / Avg: 340.48 / Max: 340.71 Min: 339.16 / Avg: 340.9 / Max: 343.3 Min: 343.92 / Avg: 345.53 / Max: 346.33 Min: 339.61 / Avg: 341.56 / Max: 342.7 Min: 726.78 / Avg: 727.5 / Max: 728.47 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -O3 -ffast-math -rdynamic -ldl -lImath -lIlmImf -lIex -lHalf -lz -lIlmThread -lxml2 -lfreetype -lpthread
Rodinia Rodinia is a suite focused upon accelerating compute-intensive applications with accelerators. CUDA, OpenMP, and OpenCL parallel models are supported by the included applications. This profile utilizes select OpenCL, NVIDIA CUDA and OpenMP test binaries at the moment. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 3.20, N = 3 SE +/- 2.24, N = 3 SE +/- 1.41, N = 3 SE +/- 2.74, N = 3 SE +/- 0.40, N = 3 477.00 477.97 479.97 480.57 1017.19 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 21.5 29.3 Ondemand 1.9 21.7 27.9 Conservative 1.8 21.4 29.9 Schedutil 1.9 21.3 30.0 Powersave 1.8 7.6 8.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 5182 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 5242 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 5170 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 5155 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 3883 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 64.4 93.1 97.8 Ondemand 65.6 91.5 95.4 Conservative 64.4 91.8 100.6 Schedutil 65.8 92.4 100.4 Powersave 38.0 47.1 48.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 60.0 76.1 78.0 Ondemand 59.0 76.6 78.0 Conservative 60.0 76.7 79.0 Schedutil 59.0 76.4 78.0 Powersave 36.0 43.9 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 64.0 92.6 98.0 Ondemand 66.0 91.0 95.0 Conservative 65.0 91.5 100.0 Schedutil 66.0 92.0 101.0 Powersave 38.0 46.7 48.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 200 400 600 800 1000 Min: 470.77 / Avg: 477 / Max: 481.36 Min: 473.61 / Avg: 477.97 / Max: 481.07 Min: 477.49 / Avg: 479.97 / Max: 482.36 Min: 475.11 / Avg: 480.57 / Max: 483.74 Min: 1016.47 / Avg: 1017.19 / Max: 1017.83 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Timed FFmpeg Compilation This test times how long it takes to build FFmpeg. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2 Time To Compile Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.35, N = 3 SE +/- 1.57, N = 3 SE +/- 1.73, N = 3 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 118.07 119.02 119.22 118.97 246.33 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 19.9 27.5 Ondemand 1.8 20.0 29.3 Conservative 1.8 19.6 29.7 Schedutil 1.9 19.9 29.9 Powersave 1.8 7.1 8.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 1254 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 1270 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 1258 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 1266 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 908 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 62.6 87.8 94.5 Ondemand 61.0 87.3 94.8 Conservative 55.1 86.4 93.3 Schedutil 58.5 87.4 95.1 Powersave 37.8 45.9 47.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 54.0 73.0 78.0 Ondemand 52.0 72.5 78.0 Conservative 50.0 72.3 78.0 Schedutil 52.0 72.7 77.0 Powersave 35.0 43.7 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 62.0 87.4 94.0 Ondemand 61.0 86.9 94.0 Conservative 55.0 86.2 93.0 Schedutil 58.0 87.0 95.0 Powersave 37.0 45.5 47.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2 Time To Compile Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 115.41 / Avg: 118.07 / Max: 119.81 Min: 115.98 / Avg: 119.02 / Max: 121.2 Min: 115.98 / Avg: 119.22 / Max: 121.87 Min: 116.01 / Avg: 118.97 / Max: 121.15 Min: 246.11 / Avg: 246.33 / Max: 246.49
DaCapo Benchmark This test runs the DaCapo Benchmarks written in Java and intended to test system/CPU performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 47.70, N = 5 SE +/- 66.80, N = 7 SE +/- 66.16, N = 4 SE +/- 56.23, N = 20 SE +/- 68.27, N = 20 4644 6090 5271 5582 9629 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 13.4 23.1 Ondemand 1.8 12.2 21.6 Conservative 1.7 12.4 22.2 Schedutil 1.8 13.5 24.3 Powersave 1.7 4.7 7.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 102 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 105 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 105 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 109 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 63 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 52.3 70.8 78.0 Ondemand 52.8 69.8 81.3 Conservative 52.4 69.0 76.6 Schedutil 56.5 78.6 89.6 Powersave 37.6 40.2 41.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 51.0 57.1 62.0 Ondemand 52.0 56.9 61.0 Conservative 51.0 55.7 60.0 Schedutil 54.0 60.9 66.0 Powersave 36.0 38.3 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 52.0 70.2 78.0 Ondemand 52.0 69.4 78.0 Conservative 52.0 68.6 76.0 Schedutil 55.0 78.0 89.0 Powersave 37.0 39.8 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K Min: 4551 / Avg: 4643.6 / Max: 4809 Min: 5786 / Avg: 6090 / Max: 6246 Min: 5136 / Avg: 5270.5 / Max: 5438 Min: 5254 / Avg: 5581.55 / Max: 6230 Min: 9138 / Avg: 9628.55 / Max: 10244
NAMD NAMD is a parallel molecular dynamics code designed for high-performance simulation of large biomolecular systems. NAMD was developed by the Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group in the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.13 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02746, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00510, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02582, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00154, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00071, N = 3 4.54738 4.54976 4.58681 4.55413 9.39727 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 20.5 22.7 Ondemand 1.7 20.4 24.3 Conservative 1.9 20.3 22.5 Schedutil 1.8 20.2 23.3 Powersave 1.9 7.3 8.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 2259 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 2126 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 2127 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 2108 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 1570 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 63.6 93.2 101.9 Ondemand 65.3 93.3 101.5 Conservative 65.0 92.8 101.4 Schedutil 63.8 92.7 100.6 Powersave 41.4 46.7 48.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 62.0 75.7 78.0 Ondemand 64.0 76.1 78.0 Conservative 63.0 76.1 78.0 Schedutil 62.0 75.6 78.0 Powersave 40.0 43.9 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.13 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 63.0 92.6 102.0 Ondemand 65.0 92.8 101.0 Conservative 65.0 92.5 101.0 Schedutil 63.0 92.4 101.0 Powersave 41.0 46.3 48.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.13 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.13 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 Min: 4.49 / Avg: 4.55 / Max: 4.59 Min: 4.54 / Avg: 4.55 / Max: 4.56 Min: 4.56 / Avg: 4.59 / Max: 4.64 Min: 4.55 / Avg: 4.55 / Max: 4.56 Min: 9.4 / Avg: 9.4 / Max: 9.4
Darktable Darktable is an open-source photography / workflow application this will use any system-installed Darktable program or on Windows will automatically download the pre-built binary from the project. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.1168 0.2336 0.3504 0.4672 0.584 SE +/- 0.002, N = 13 SE +/- 0.004, N = 15 SE +/- 0.004, N = 15 SE +/- 0.001, N = 13 SE +/- 0.001, N = 11 0.252 0.263 0.301 0.267 0.519 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Ondemand 1.7 3.8 10.6 Conservative 1.5 3.6 11.2 Schedutil 1.6 3.6 11.1 Powersave 1.6 2.7 5.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 10 Joules per run. 2. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 9 Joules per run. 3. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 9 Joules per run. 4. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 8 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 56.9 65.7 74.6 Conservative 56.9 66.3 76.8 Schedutil 55.6 67.5 76.8 Powersave 35.5 36.5 37.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 44.0 48.0 53.0 Conservative 44.0 48.3 53.0 Schedutil 45.0 47.6 52.0 Powersave 34.0 34.7 36.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 57.0 65.8 75.0 Conservative 56.0 65.4 77.0 Schedutil 56.0 67.4 77.0 Powersave 35.0 36.1 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 Min: 0.25 / Avg: 0.25 / Max: 0.27 Min: 0.25 / Avg: 0.26 / Max: 0.31 Min: 0.28 / Avg: 0.3 / Max: 0.34 Min: 0.26 / Avg: 0.27 / Max: 0.27 Min: 0.52 / Avg: 0.52 / Max: 0.52
Timed MPlayer Compilation This test times how long it takes to build the MPlayer open-source media player program. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 Time To Compile Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.73, N = 3 SE +/- 0.86, N = 3 SE +/- 1.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 86.20 86.15 87.24 86.33 175.29 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 18.6 27.3 Ondemand 2.1 18.3 24.7 Conservative 1.9 17.4 23.8 Schedutil 2.0 18.2 24.1 Powersave 1.6 6.8 8.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 879 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 894 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 869 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 877 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 641 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 68.0 90.7 94.5 Ondemand 64.0 89.6 96.4 Conservative 63.3 89.6 94.5 Schedutil 67.3 90.6 94.6 Powersave 40.8 46.2 48.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 65.0 75.5 78.0 Ondemand 60.0 74.5 78.0 Conservative 59.0 74.7 79.0 Schedutil 62.0 74.5 78.0 Powersave 39.0 44.0 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 68.0 90.3 94.0 Ondemand 64.0 89.2 97.0 Conservative 63.0 89.2 94.0 Schedutil 67.0 90.3 95.0 Powersave 40.0 45.9 48.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 Time To Compile Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 84.75 / Avg: 86.2 / Max: 87.08 Min: 84.45 / Avg: 86.15 / Max: 87.24 Min: 85.15 / Avg: 87.24 / Max: 88.28 Min: 84.8 / Avg: 86.33 / Max: 87.27 Min: 175.25 / Avg: 175.29 / Max: 175.32
Darktable Darktable is an open-source photography / workflow application this will use any system-installed Darktable program or on Windows will automatically download the pre-built binary from the project. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.012, N = 6 SE +/- 0.011, N = 6 SE +/- 0.017, N = 6 SE +/- 0.016, N = 6 SE +/- 0.008, N = 4 6.215 6.268 6.358 6.246 12.643 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Ondemand 1.8 12.8 27.6 Conservative 1.6 12.8 27.8 Schedutil 1.7 13.1 27.0 Powersave 1.2 5.1 7.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 77 Joules per run. 2. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 77 Joules per run. 3. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 76 Joules per run. 4. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 51 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 44.3 67.6 77.0 Conservative 44.4 69.4 79.6 Schedutil 44.0 67.9 79.3 Powersave 34.9 39.4 43.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 44.0 52.0 58.0 Conservative 43.0 52.3 59.0 Schedutil 42.0 51.8 59.0 Powersave 33.0 37.0 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80 System Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 44.0 67.1 77.0 Conservative 44.0 69.1 79.0 Schedutil 44.0 67.0 76.0 Powersave 34.0 39.0 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 4 8 12 16 20 Min: 6.16 / Avg: 6.21 / Max: 6.25 Min: 6.23 / Avg: 6.27 / Max: 6.3 Min: 6.31 / Avg: 6.36 / Max: 6.43 Min: 6.19 / Avg: 6.25 / Max: 6.3 Min: 12.63 / Avg: 12.64 / Max: 12.66
DaCapo Benchmark This test runs the DaCapo Benchmarks written in Java and intended to test system/CPU performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 40.27, N = 20 SE +/- 45.63, N = 20 SE +/- 66.98, N = 20 SE +/- 71.17, N = 4 SE +/- 58.36, N = 20 3582 4573 5111 5298 7258 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 8.5 19.7 Ondemand 1.7 8.2 18.0 Conservative 1.7 7.8 17.1 Schedutil 1.8 7.2 17.2 Powersave 1.7 4.1 6.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 59 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 62 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 62 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 57 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 50 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 56.6 70.3 81.0 Ondemand 55.8 69.2 79.8 Conservative 53.1 67.5 79.4 Schedutil 52.8 67.6 73.4 Powersave 36.9 38.2 39.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 51.0 54.6 60.0 Ondemand 49.0 53.0 58.0 Conservative 48.0 51.9 58.0 Schedutil 50.0 52.6 56.0 Powersave 35.0 36.2 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 55.0 69.9 81.0 Ondemand 54.0 68.9 80.0 Conservative 53.0 66.9 79.0 Schedutil 52.0 67.3 73.0 Powersave 36.0 37.8 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 Min: 3242 / Avg: 3582.45 / Max: 3948 Min: 4148 / Avg: 4572.85 / Max: 5017 Min: 4528 / Avg: 5111.45 / Max: 5664 Min: 5100 / Avg: 5298 / Max: 5432 Min: 6672 / Avg: 7257.55 / Max: 7798
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation This test times how long it takes to build the Linux kernel in a default configuration. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 SE +/- 0.61, N = 3 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 SE +/- 0.82, N = 3 SE +/- 1.37, N = 3 194.23 194.61 196.51 195.08 388.70 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 2.0 19.5 30.0 Ondemand 1.8 19.2 27.2 Conservative 1.9 19.0 29.8 Schedutil 2.0 19.3 22.1 Powersave 1.7 7.1 8.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 1997 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 1983 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 1996 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 2012 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 1439 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 67.4 90.6 93.0 Ondemand 63.8 89.8 95.0 Conservative 63.0 89.2 94.0 Schedutil 64.6 89.9 95.3 Powersave 39.3 46.8 48.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 60.0 75.7 79.0 Ondemand 57.0 75.1 79.0 Conservative 56.0 74.7 79.0 Schedutil 57.0 74.8 79.0 Powersave 38.0 44.5 47.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 67.0 90.3 93.0 Ondemand 64.0 89.6 95.0 Conservative 63.0 88.8 93.0 Schedutil 64.0 89.6 95.0 Powersave 39.0 46.4 48.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 70 140 210 280 350 Min: 193.49 / Avg: 194.23 / Max: 194.62 Min: 193.38 / Avg: 194.61 / Max: 195.29 Min: 195.31 / Avg: 196.51 / Max: 197.36 Min: 193.7 / Avg: 195.08 / Max: 196.53 Min: 385.97 / Avg: 388.7 / Max: 390.09
Selenium This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Runs / Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 71.3 58.6 47.9 55.7 35.7 1. firefox 77.0.1 Runs / Minute Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Runs / Minute Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 9.61 8.81 8.97 8.71 8.84 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 7.4 13.5 Ondemand 1.8 6.6 11.2 Conservative 1.7 5.3 10.3 Schedutil 1.9 6.4 12.4 Powersave 1.8 4.0 5.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 324 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 315 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 303 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 322 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 303 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 61.5 72.6 Ondemand 41.1 56.9 64.4 Conservative 39.5 51.4 59.8 Schedutil 41.3 55.8 64.5 Powersave 36.5 38.3 39.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 43.0 47.8 51.0 Ondemand 39.0 44.6 48.0 Conservative 38.0 42.5 45.0 Schedutil 40.0 44.6 49.0 Powersave 35.0 36.4 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 61.1 71.0 Ondemand 41.0 56.5 64.0 Conservative 39.0 51.0 59.0 Schedutil 41.0 55.4 64.0 Powersave 36.0 37.9 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Runs / Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 14 28 42 56 70 Min: 71 / Avg: 71.27 / Max: 71.6 Min: 58.4 / Avg: 58.6 / Max: 58.8 Min: 47.3 / Avg: 47.9 / Max: 48.3 Min: 55.4 / Avg: 55.73 / Max: 56 Min: 35.7 / Avg: 35.73 / Max: 35.8 1. firefox 77.0.1
Darktable Darktable is an open-source photography / workflow application this will use any system-installed Darktable program or on Windows will automatically download the pre-built binary from the project. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.006, N = 5 SE +/- 0.013, N = 5 SE +/- 0.027, N = 5 SE +/- 0.010, N = 5 SE +/- 0.029, N = 3 9.496 9.603 9.757 9.581 18.920 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Ondemand 1.8 13.7 25.5 Conservative 1.7 13.8 25.5 Schedutil 1.7 14.1 25.5 Powersave 1.7 4.9 6.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40 1. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 101 Joules per run. 2. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 105 Joules per run. 3. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 104 Joules per run. 4. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 64 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 63.0 76.0 85.0 Conservative 62.1 77.1 85.8 Schedutil 55.0 75.7 83.8 Powersave 38.4 40.3 41.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 53.0 59.8 66.0 Conservative 53.0 59.7 64.0 Schedutil 53.0 59.4 64.0 Powersave 36.0 38.1 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 60.0 75.4 85.0 Conservative 59.0 76.4 85.0 Schedutil 55.0 75.3 84.0 Powersave 38.0 39.8 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 9.48 / Avg: 9.5 / Max: 9.51 Min: 9.58 / Avg: 9.6 / Max: 9.64 Min: 9.69 / Avg: 9.76 / Max: 9.84 Min: 9.55 / Avg: 9.58 / Max: 9.61 Min: 18.88 / Avg: 18.92 / Max: 18.98
SVT-VP9 This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-VP9 CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the VP9 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.13, N = 5 SE +/- 0.25, N = 5 SE +/- 0.17, N = 5 SE +/- 0.14, N = 5 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 73.03 70.70 72.47 72.38 37.02 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 4.57 4.55 4.66 4.65 6.05 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 16.0 29.1 Ondemand 1.8 15.5 29.4 Conservative 1.9 15.6 29.3 Schedutil 1.9 15.6 29.6 Powersave 1.8 6.1 7.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 99 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 103 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 100 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 100 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 63 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 55.9 76.2 88.0 Ondemand 57.6 78.3 92.0 Conservative 57.8 77.5 89.6 Schedutil 56.6 76.6 89.1 Powersave 39.8 43.2 44.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 54.0 62.5 67.0 Ondemand 56.0 63.5 68.0 Conservative 56.0 64.2 69.0 Schedutil 55.0 63.1 68.0 Powersave 39.0 40.8 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 56.0 76.0 88.0 Ondemand 58.0 77.5 92.0 Conservative 57.0 77.1 90.0 Schedutil 57.0 75.8 89.0 Powersave 40.0 42.8 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 14 28 42 56 70 Min: 72.8 / Avg: 73.03 / Max: 73.39 Min: 69.96 / Avg: 70.7 / Max: 71.27 Min: 72.12 / Avg: 72.47 / Max: 73.13 Min: 72.01 / Avg: 72.38 / Max: 72.78 Min: 36.77 / Avg: 37.02 / Max: 37.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
Intel Open Image Denoise Open Image Denoise is a denoising library for ray-tracing and part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.999 1.998 2.997 3.996 4.995 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 4.44 4.38 4.36 4.38 2.26 Images / Sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.063 0.126 0.189 0.252 0.315 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.28 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 20.0 27.8 Ondemand 2.1 19.3 24.2 Conservative 2.0 19.0 28.9 Schedutil 2.1 19.6 27.6 Powersave 1.7 8.1 9.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 493 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 490 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 482 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 491 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 379 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 67.3 91.0 97.4 Ondemand 75.6 91.9 97.4 Conservative 67.5 92.7 97.8 Schedutil 67.0 92.1 101.9 Powersave 42.0 48.5 49.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 66.0 75.1 77.0 Ondemand 66.0 75.1 78.0 Conservative 66.0 75.5 79.0 Schedutil 66.0 75.2 77.0 Powersave 41.0 45.4 47.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 67.0 90.5 96.0 Ondemand 73.0 91.3 97.0 Conservative 67.0 92.3 96.0 Schedutil 67.0 91.9 102.0 Powersave 42.0 48.1 50.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 Min: 4.38 / Avg: 4.44 / Max: 4.5 Min: 4.34 / Avg: 4.38 / Max: 4.45 Min: 4.31 / Avg: 4.36 / Max: 4.44 Min: 4.33 / Avg: 4.38 / Max: 4.48 Min: 2.26 / Avg: 2.26 / Max: 2.26
Build2 This test profile measures the time to bootstrap/install the build2 C++ build toolchain from source. Build2 is a cross-platform build toolchain for C/C++ code and features Cargo-like features. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.12 Time To Compile Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 1.52, N = 3 SE +/- 1.32, N = 3 SE +/- 1.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.78, N = 3 SE +/- 1.95, N = 3 241.93 244.10 248.05 244.30 473.02 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 2.0 18.8 25.8 Ondemand 1.7 18.9 25.9 Conservative 1.9 18.1 23.2 Schedutil 2.0 18.8 29.9 Powersave 1.6 7.0 8.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 2317 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 2344 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 2275 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 2333 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 1667 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 67.0 91.5 94.8 Ondemand 66.5 91.5 93.6 Conservative 66.4 91.7 94.5 Schedutil 65.4 91.6 93.3 Powersave 41.3 46.7 48.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.12 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 65.0 76.7 79.0 Ondemand 64.0 76.4 79.0 Conservative 65.0 77.1 80.0 Schedutil 63.0 76.4 79.0 Powersave 40.0 44.6 47.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.12 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 66.0 91.2 95.0 Ondemand 66.0 91.1 93.0 Conservative 66.0 91.4 94.0 Schedutil 65.0 91.3 93.0 Powersave 41.0 46.3 48.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.12 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Build2 0.12 Time To Compile Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 80 160 240 320 400 Min: 239.03 / Avg: 241.93 / Max: 244.16 Min: 242.19 / Avg: 244.1 / Max: 246.63 Min: 246.05 / Avg: 248.05 / Max: 250.35 Min: 242.81 / Avg: 244.3 / Max: 245.45 Min: 469.12 / Avg: 473.02 / Max: 474.97
Rodinia Rodinia is a suite focused upon accelerating compute-intensive applications with accelerators. CUDA, OpenMP, and OpenCL parallel models are supported by the included applications. This profile utilizes select OpenCL, NVIDIA CUDA and OpenMP test binaries at the moment. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 45.13 45.63 45.88 45.64 87.34 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 19.7 25.8 Ondemand 2.1 19.9 29.3 Conservative 1.9 19.6 22.1 Schedutil 1.8 19.6 28.5 Powersave 1.5 6.1 7.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 485 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 490 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 490 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 491 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 278 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 65.0 87.7 94.1 Ondemand 65.3 87.9 94.6 Conservative 65.3 88.3 94.9 Schedutil 66.1 88.2 95.4 Powersave 39.5 43.8 45.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 62.0 73.3 77.0 Ondemand 64.0 73.9 77.0 Conservative 63.0 73.8 77.0 Schedutil 63.0 73.6 77.0 Powersave 38.0 41.9 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 65.0 87.3 94.0 Ondemand 65.0 87.6 94.0 Conservative 65.0 88.0 94.0 Schedutil 66.0 87.8 95.0 Powersave 39.0 43.4 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 44.83 / Avg: 45.13 / Max: 45.33 Min: 45.23 / Avg: 45.63 / Max: 45.92 Min: 45.66 / Avg: 45.88 / Max: 46.12 Min: 45.51 / Avg: 45.64 / Max: 45.86 Min: 86.9 / Avg: 87.34 / Max: 87.72 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 26.73 26.93 27.03 26.87 51.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 2.0 18.8 27.6 Ondemand 1.9 18.9 29.2 Conservative 1.8 18.8 24.8 Schedutil 1.7 18.9 27.4 Powersave 1.7 6.3 8.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 295 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 295 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 295 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 296 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 176 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 64.8 83.4 97.8 Ondemand 65.4 84.4 94.4 Conservative 65.0 84.9 91.0 Schedutil 65.1 83.6 89.8 Powersave 40.6 44.2 45.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 63.0 71.3 76.0 Ondemand 64.0 71.9 76.0 Conservative 63.0 72.1 76.0 Schedutil 64.0 71.6 76.0 Powersave 40.0 42.5 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 64.0 83.0 98.0 Ondemand 65.0 83.8 94.0 Conservative 65.0 84.6 91.0 Schedutil 65.0 83.3 90.0 Powersave 40.0 43.8 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 26.58 / Avg: 26.73 / Max: 26.83 Min: 26.78 / Avg: 26.93 / Max: 27.07 Min: 26.82 / Avg: 27.03 / Max: 27.16 Min: 26.72 / Avg: 26.87 / Max: 26.99 Min: 51.59 / Avg: 51.62 / Max: 51.64 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
GNU Octave Benchmark This test profile measures how long it takes to complete several reference GNU Octave files via octave-benchmark. GNU Octave is used for numerical computations and is an open-source alternative to MATLAB. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GNU Octave Benchmark 5.2.0 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.022, N = 5 SE +/- 0.021, N = 5 SE +/- 0.046, N = 5 SE +/- 0.029, N = 5 SE +/- 0.053, N = 5 8.703 8.712 8.836 8.750 16.624 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Ondemand 1.7 5.4 10.9 Conservative 1.8 5.2 8.7 Schedutil 1.7 5.3 10.3 Powersave 1.8 3.5 5.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GNU Octave Benchmark 5.2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 35 Joules per run. 2. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 33 Joules per run. 3. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 35 Joules per run. 4. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 37 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 50.3 63.8 72.6 Conservative 51.3 65.3 75.1 Schedutil 52.8 65.5 74.5 Powersave 36.3 37.0 37.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GNU Octave Benchmark 5.2.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 46.0 48.8 54.0 Conservative 47.0 49.7 53.0 Schedutil 47.0 48.8 52.0 Powersave 34.0 35.0 36.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GNU Octave Benchmark 5.2.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 50.0 63.4 72.0 Conservative 51.0 65.5 75.0 Schedutil 50.0 65.3 75.0 Powersave 36.0 36.6 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GNU Octave Benchmark 5.2.0 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GNU Octave Benchmark 5.2.0 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 4 8 12 16 20 Min: 8.66 / Avg: 8.7 / Max: 8.79 Min: 8.68 / Avg: 8.71 / Max: 8.79 Min: 8.76 / Avg: 8.84 / Max: 9.01 Min: 8.69 / Avg: 8.75 / Max: 8.84 Min: 16.54 / Avg: 16.62 / Max: 16.83
OSPray Intel OSPray is a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidenlity scientific visualizations. OSPray builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.0855 0.171 0.2565 0.342 0.4275 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.20 MIN: 0.37 / MAX: 0.41 MIN: 0.36 / MAX: 0.41 MIN: 0.37 / MAX: 0.4 MIN: 0.37 / MAX: 0.41 FPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.0068 0.0136 0.0204 0.0272 0.034 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 20.0 27.5 Ondemand 1.9 19.8 29.3 Conservative 2.0 19.3 29.5 Schedutil 1.9 19.6 29.5 Powersave 1.7 6.9 7.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 5792 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 5807 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 5696 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 5763 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 3939 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 54.9 89.9 95.5 Ondemand 55.4 90.5 95.0 Conservative 64.9 90.8 95.9 Schedutil 64.6 90.9 95.5 Powersave 39.0 46.5 48.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 51.0 75.0 79.0 Ondemand 52.0 75.4 79.0 Conservative 56.0 75.8 79.0 Schedutil 56.0 75.5 79.0 Powersave 36.0 43.9 47.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 54.0 89.3 95.0 Ondemand 55.0 90.3 95.0 Conservative 65.0 90.1 96.0 Schedutil 65.0 90.6 95.0 Powersave 39.0 46.0 48.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 1 2 3 4 5 Min: 0.38 / Avg: 0.38 / Max: 0.39 Min: 0.37 / Avg: 0.38 / Max: 0.38 Min: 0.37 / Avg: 0.38 / Max: 0.38 Min: 0.37 / Avg: 0.38 / Max: 0.38 Min: 0.2 / Avg: 0.2 / Max: 0.2
Timed LLVM Compilation This test times how long it takes to build the LLVM compiler. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 4.08, N = 3 SE +/- 3.14, N = 3 SE +/- 4.73, N = 3 SE +/- 4.79, N = 3 SE +/- 11.09, N = 3 1515.13 1528.79 1542.79 1528.90 2864.64 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 1.86 / Avg: 19.01 / Max: 28.9 Min: 2.03 / Avg: 18.86 / Max: 29.62 Min: 1.76 / Avg: 18.17 / Max: 25.88 Min: 1.96 / Avg: 18.74 / Max: 26.6 Min: 1.62 / Avg: 7.16 / Max: 8.2 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 14572 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 14615 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 14224 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 14514 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 10373 Joules per run. CPU Temp
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 CPU Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 69.13 / Avg: 92.17 / Max: 92.75 Min: 67.75 / Avg: 91.97 / Max: 93.88 Min: 66.38 / Avg: 91.89 / Max: 100.25 Min: 66 / Avg: 91.98 / Max: 95.5 Min: 39.75 / Avg: 47.21 / Max: 48.5 GPU Temp
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 GPU Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 15 30 45 60 75 Min: 63 / Avg: 77.32 / Max: 80 Min: 60 / Avg: 77.36 / Max: 79 Min: 59 / Avg: 77.66 / Max: 80 Min: 59 / Avg: 77.19 / Max: 79 Min: 38 / Avg: 44.79 / Max: 47 System Temp
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 System Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 69 / Avg: 91.75 / Max: 92 Min: 68 / Avg: 91.68 / Max: 94 Min: 64 / Avg: 91.65 / Max: 101 Min: 66 / Avg: 91.72 / Max: 96 Min: 39 / Avg: 46.79 / Max: 48 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Min: 1510.16 / Avg: 1515.13 / Max: 1523.21 Min: 1524.34 / Avg: 1528.79 / Max: 1534.85 Min: 1533.36 / Avg: 1542.79 / Max: 1548.23 Min: 1519.8 / Avg: 1528.9 / Max: 1536.05 Min: 2847.61 / Avg: 2864.64 / Max: 2885.47
dav1d Dav1d is an open-source, speedy AV1 video decoder. This test profile times how long it takes to decode sample AV1 video content. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.81, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.60, N = 3 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 SE +/- 0.72, N = 3 264.03 242.63 252.91 234.02 142.04 MIN: 230.23 / MAX: 286.66 MIN: 222.18 / MAX: 259.82 MIN: 205.48 / MAX: 274.78 MIN: 211.15 / MAX: 254.47 MIN: 132.15 / MAX: 156.04 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread FPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 7 14 21 28 35 27.98 17.93 18.97 16.85 31.68 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 9.4 24.3 Ondemand 1.8 13.5 24.0 Conservative 1.8 13.3 25.3 Schedutil 1.9 13.9 24.6 Powersave 1.8 4.5 8.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 337 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 257 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 253 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 264 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 209 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 50.3 67.3 81.1 Ondemand 65.0 78.8 85.5 Conservative 58.4 78.3 86.5 Schedutil 62.9 79.2 87.5 Powersave 37.5 40.3 42.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 48.0 54.6 61.0 Ondemand 55.0 61.2 65.0 Conservative 56.0 64.8 70.0 Schedutil 55.0 62.4 68.0 Powersave 35.0 37.8 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 50.0 66.8 79.0 Ondemand 62.0 78.3 85.0 Conservative 58.0 77.6 86.0 Schedutil 63.0 78.8 87.0 Powersave 37.0 39.8 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 50 100 150 200 250 Min: 262.43 / Avg: 264.03 / Max: 265.1 Min: 242.13 / Avg: 242.63 / Max: 242.95 Min: 251.73 / Avg: 252.91 / Max: 253.67 Min: 233.6 / Avg: 234.02 / Max: 234.73 Min: 140.64 / Avg: 142.04 / Max: 143.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
SVT-VP9 This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-VP9 CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the VP9 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.14, N = 6 SE +/- 0.15, N = 6 SE +/- 0.17, N = 6 SE +/- 0.19, N = 6 SE +/- 0.05, N = 4 88.77 85.83 87.69 87.31 48.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 6.02 5.86 5.77 5.70 7.97 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.5 14.7 26.5 Ondemand 1.9 14.7 29.7 Conservative 1.9 15.2 28.6 Schedutil 1.8 15.3 29.8 Powersave 1.6 6.0 8.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 84 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 86 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 86 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 87 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 51 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 59.5 77.5 89.5 Ondemand 60.5 79.9 91.5 Conservative 61.6 81.2 93.9 Schedutil 58.3 80.5 94.0 Powersave 39.8 43.0 44.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 57.0 63.4 68.0 Ondemand 58.0 64.1 68.0 Conservative 59.0 65.2 69.0 Schedutil 56.0 63.7 68.0 Powersave 38.0 40.9 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 57.0 77.0 89.0 Ondemand 61.0 79.6 92.0 Conservative 61.0 80.6 93.0 Schedutil 58.0 80.2 94.0 Powersave 39.0 42.5 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 88.17 / Avg: 88.77 / Max: 89.07 Min: 85.31 / Avg: 85.83 / Max: 86.39 Min: 87.2 / Avg: 87.69 / Max: 88.34 Min: 86.74 / Avg: 87.31 / Max: 88.07 Min: 47.94 / Avg: 48.07 / Max: 48.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.51, N = 6 SE +/- 0.49, N = 6 SE +/- 0.43, N = 6 SE +/- 0.46, N = 6 SE +/- 0.17, N = 4 86.68 83.11 85.84 85.22 47.55 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 5.75 5.45 5.64 5.60 7.95 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 15.1 29.3 Ondemand 1.9 15.3 29.0 Conservative 2.0 15.2 28.7 Schedutil 2.0 15.2 29.5 Powersave 1.7 6.0 8.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 85 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 89 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 86 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 86 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 51 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 63.0 81.1 93.5 Ondemand 64.3 85.3 95.3 Conservative 67.0 86.8 96.9 Schedutil 64.1 84.3 95.4 Powersave 40.3 43.3 44.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 61.0 66.7 70.0 Ondemand 62.0 67.3 71.0 Conservative 64.0 68.3 71.0 Schedutil 62.0 67.0 70.0 Powersave 39.0 41.2 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 63.0 80.8 93.0 Ondemand 64.0 84.7 95.0 Conservative 67.0 85.6 96.0 Schedutil 64.0 84.1 96.0 Powersave 40.0 42.9 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 16 32 48 64 80 Min: 84.28 / Avg: 86.68 / Max: 87.66 Min: 80.73 / Avg: 83.11 / Max: 84.03 Min: 83.73 / Avg: 85.84 / Max: 86.58 Min: 82.99 / Avg: 85.22 / Max: 85.94 Min: 47.19 / Avg: 47.55 / Max: 47.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
Meta Performance Per Watts OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watts, More Is Better Meta Performance Per Watts Performance Per Watts Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 121.85 116.61 113.79 115.97 66.95
DaCapo Benchmark This test runs the DaCapo Benchmarks written in Java and intended to test system/CPU performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 25.78, N = 4 SE +/- 115.05, N = 5 SE +/- 113.17, N = 5 SE +/- 69.60, N = 14 SE +/- 51.06, N = 4 8478 9172 8670 8800 15326 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 15.6 23.5 Ondemand 1.8 15.2 23.0 Conservative 1.8 14.9 24.6 Schedutil 1.8 15.8 25.1 Powersave 1.8 5.4 7.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 183 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 182 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 184 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 198 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 87 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.3 68.1 76.5 Ondemand 47.0 70.2 76.8 Conservative 46.8 69.4 76.6 Schedutil 46.8 79.3 95.0 Powersave 35.3 39.3 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 55.9 63.0 Ondemand 46.0 57.6 65.0 Conservative 46.0 56.6 64.0 Schedutil 46.0 63.0 69.0 Powersave 33.0 37.3 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 67.6 76.0 Ondemand 46.0 69.5 76.0 Conservative 46.0 68.6 77.0 Schedutil 47.0 78.8 95.0 Powersave 35.0 38.9 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K Min: 8417 / Avg: 8478.25 / Max: 8536 Min: 8752 / Avg: 9172.4 / Max: 9386 Min: 8254 / Avg: 8670.4 / Max: 8886 Min: 8406 / Avg: 8799.71 / Max: 9472 Min: 15189 / Avg: 15326.25 / Max: 15435
dav1d Dav1d is an open-source, speedy AV1 video decoder. This test profile times how long it takes to decode sample AV1 video content. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.60, N = 3 SE +/- 1.79, N = 3 SE +/- 3.89, N = 3 SE +/- 3.70, N = 3 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 272.93 236.92 255.04 240.03 151.90 MIN: 205.05 / MAX: 442.91 MIN: 183.88 / MAX: 374.04 MIN: 191.16 / MAX: 356.78 MIN: 181.85 / MAX: 388.83 MIN: 115.29 / MAX: 239.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread FPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 10 20 30 40 50 42.48 31.74 22.32 20.61 33.92 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 1.75 / Avg: 6.43 / Max: 23.34 Min: 1.8 / Avg: 7.46 / Max: 23.23 Min: 1.72 / Avg: 11.43 / Max: 24.46 Min: 1.63 / Avg: 11.65 / Max: 23.9 Min: 1.77 / Avg: 4.48 / Max: 8.17 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 4513 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 3048 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 2301 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 2220 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 2334 Joules per run. CPU Temp
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 CPU Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 40.13 / Avg: 57.53 / Max: 76.75 Min: 40 / Avg: 60.54 / Max: 83.88 Min: 40 / Avg: 72.98 / Max: 89.63 Min: 39.63 / Avg: 72.81 / Max: 85 Min: 34.75 / Avg: 39.38 / Max: 44.38 GPU Temp
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 GPU Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 14 28 42 56 70 Min: 40 / Avg: 51.59 / Max: 66 Min: 39 / Avg: 51.59 / Max: 67 Min: 39 / Avg: 57.53 / Max: 70 Min: 38 / Avg: 59.18 / Max: 71 Min: 33 / Avg: 37.35 / Max: 43 System Temp
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 System Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 40 / Avg: 57.08 / Max: 76 Min: 40 / Avg: 60.15 / Max: 84 Min: 40 / Avg: 72.52 / Max: 88 Min: 39 / Avg: 72.3 / Max: 85 Min: 34 / Avg: 39.01 / Max: 44 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 50 100 150 200 250 Min: 270.12 / Avg: 272.93 / Max: 275.65 Min: 233.35 / Avg: 236.92 / Max: 239 Min: 247.3 / Avg: 255.04 / Max: 259.68 Min: 233.07 / Avg: 240.03 / Max: 245.68 Min: 151.49 / Avg: 151.9 / Max: 152.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 79.55 77.72 75.97 75.41 44.34 MIN: 74.67 / MAX: 89.89 MIN: 73.36 / MAX: 86.95 MIN: 71.2 / MAX: 84.94 MIN: 70.94 / MAX: 84.6 MIN: 40.87 / MAX: 51.85 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread FPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 5.79 4.33 4.26 4.19 7.66 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 13.7 26.3 Ondemand 1.9 18.0 28.1 Conservative 1.8 17.8 29.4 Schedutil 1.9 18.0 28.1 Powersave 1.9 5.8 8.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 696 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 640 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 654 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 654 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 425 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.5 71.4 88.8 Ondemand 47.4 80.2 96.0 Conservative 50.1 80.5 93.5 Schedutil 49.5 81.2 95.1 Powersave 34.8 42.2 45.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 59.4 68.0 Ondemand 46.0 63.9 72.0 Conservative 49.0 66.0 72.0 Schedutil 48.0 66.0 72.0 Powersave 33.0 39.8 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 70.9 89.0 Ondemand 47.0 79.7 96.0 Conservative 50.0 80.1 94.0 Schedutil 49.0 80.6 95.0 Powersave 34.0 41.8 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 15 30 45 60 75 Min: 79.2 / Avg: 79.55 / Max: 80.13 Min: 77.64 / Avg: 77.72 / Max: 77.87 Min: 75.67 / Avg: 75.97 / Max: 76.3 Min: 75.15 / Avg: 75.41 / Max: 75.8 Min: 44.08 / Avg: 44.34 / Max: 44.6 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
Xonotic This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.78, N = 3 SE +/- 0.79, N = 3 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 SE +/- 1.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 224.61 223.22 239.78 229.79 150.17 MIN: 116 / MAX: 627 MIN: 111 / MAX: 543 MIN: 119 / MAX: 546 MIN: 108 / MAX: 589 MIN: 96 / MAX: 332 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 7 14 21 28 35 27.06 27.24 26.98 25.87 28.70 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 8.3 14.6 Ondemand 1.8 8.2 13.8 Conservative 1.8 8.9 14.9 Schedutil 1.7 8.9 14.8 Powersave 1.8 5.2 7.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 238 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 238 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 246 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 249 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 232 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 43.3 54.0 60.4 Ondemand 42.3 52.6 57.3 Conservative 46.8 58.4 64.0 Schedutil 44.5 56.7 64.4 Powersave 41.8 43.4 44.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 47.3 52.0 Ondemand 41.0 45.9 51.0 Conservative 46.0 50.5 55.0 Schedutil 44.0 49.1 54.0 Powersave 39.0 41.8 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 43.0 53.6 60.0 Ondemand 42.0 52.1 57.0 Conservative 46.0 58.0 64.0 Schedutil 44.0 56.2 64.0 Powersave 41.0 42.8 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 221.93 / Avg: 224.61 / Max: 227.97 Min: 221.78 / Avg: 223.22 / Max: 224.5 Min: 239.17 / Avg: 239.78 / Max: 240.57 Min: 227.81 / Avg: 229.79 / Max: 231.58 Min: 149.52 / Avg: 150.17 / Max: 151.01
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.03, N = 3 SE +/- 2.78, N = 3 SE +/- 0.85, N = 3 SE +/- 2.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 193.54 182.74 182.89 191.37 122.32 MIN: 102 / MAX: 292 MIN: 96 / MAX: 296 MIN: 105 / MAX: 294 MIN: 106 / MAX: 301 MIN: 76 / MAX: 238 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 4 8 12 16 20 12.30 12.59 12.47 12.40 15.61 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 15.7 21.0 Ondemand 1.9 14.5 20.0 Conservative 1.8 14.7 20.3 Schedutil 1.8 15.4 21.5 Powersave 1.9 7.8 12.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 509 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 493 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 499 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 509 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 415 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.3 65.0 72.6 Ondemand 42.8 62.0 73.3 Conservative 46.3 66.7 76.9 Schedutil 46.1 66.4 79.8 Powersave 39.9 46.9 50.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 43.0 59.5 69.0 Ondemand 41.0 56.0 65.0 Conservative 45.0 60.6 68.0 Schedutil 44.0 60.9 71.0 Powersave 38.0 46.0 51.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 64.6 72.0 Ondemand 42.0 61.7 73.0 Conservative 46.0 66.2 77.0 Schedutil 45.0 65.9 79.0 Powersave 39.0 46.5 50.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 190.88 / Avg: 193.54 / Max: 197.53 Min: 177.56 / Avg: 182.74 / Max: 187.06 Min: 181.37 / Avg: 182.89 / Max: 184.31 Min: 187.5 / Avg: 191.37 / Max: 195.15 Min: 121.95 / Avg: 122.32 / Max: 122.55
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 SE +/- 0.98, N = 3 SE +/- 1.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.90, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 170.23 163.30 158.72 167.89 109.30 MIN: 110 / MAX: 261 MIN: 94 / MAX: 254 MIN: 95 / MAX: 256 MIN: 95 / MAX: 260 MIN: 68 / MAX: 205 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 9.68 10.02 9.92 9.55 12.88 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 2.2 17.6 22.8 Ondemand 1.9 16.3 21.5 Conservative 1.9 16.0 21.5 Schedutil 1.9 17.6 24.0 Powersave 1.9 8.5 13.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 633 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 609 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 619 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 645 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 495 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 53.3 73.3 85.3 Ondemand 49.5 68.7 82.9 Conservative 53.1 72.1 82.4 Schedutil 53.9 75.0 90.5 Powersave 43.3 49.2 53.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 51.0 66.7 74.0 Ondemand 48.0 62.8 69.0 Conservative 52.0 65.7 73.0 Schedutil 53.0 67.7 77.0 Powersave 40.0 48.3 55.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 53.0 73.0 85.0 Ondemand 49.0 68.2 80.0 Conservative 53.0 71.6 82.0 Schedutil 54.0 74.6 91.0 Powersave 43.0 48.8 53.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 169.36 / Avg: 170.23 / Max: 170.73 Min: 161.36 / Avg: 163.3 / Max: 164.53 Min: 156.49 / Avg: 158.72 / Max: 160.05 Min: 166.09 / Avg: 167.89 / Max: 168.92 Min: 108.87 / Avg: 109.3 / Max: 109.73
GROMACS The GROMACS (GROningen MAchine for Chemical Simulations) molecular dynamics package testing on the CPU with the water_GMX50 data. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day, More Is Better GROMACS 2020.1 Water Benchmark Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.1078 0.2156 0.3234 0.4312 0.539 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 SE +/- 0.004, N = 3 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.477 0.479 0.476 0.477 0.311 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lrt -lpthread -lm Ns Per Day Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day Per Watt, More Is Better GROMACS 2020.1 Water Benchmark Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.009 0.018 0.027 0.036 0.045 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 20.7 22.7 Ondemand 1.8 21.0 25.6 Conservative 1.8 20.5 27.9 Schedutil 1.7 20.7 22.8 Powersave 1.3 8.2 9.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GROMACS 2020.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 3872 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 3917 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 3857 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 3878 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 2349 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 48.5 92.0 100.6 Ondemand 41.3 91.2 101.0 Conservative 45.6 91.8 101.4 Schedutil 46.3 91.7 99.9 Powersave 36.0 47.8 49.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GROMACS 2020.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 47.0 75.6 79.0 Ondemand 40.0 74.9 79.0 Conservative 44.0 75.7 79.0 Schedutil 45.0 75.2 79.0 Powersave 33.0 44.6 48.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GROMACS 2020.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 48.0 91.6 100.0 Ondemand 41.0 90.6 101.0 Conservative 45.0 91.3 101.0 Schedutil 46.0 91.2 100.0 Powersave 36.0 47.3 50.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GROMACS 2020.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day, More Is Better GROMACS 2020.1 Water Benchmark Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 1 2 3 4 5 Min: 0.47 / Avg: 0.48 / Max: 0.48 Min: 0.47 / Avg: 0.48 / Max: 0.49 Min: 0.47 / Avg: 0.48 / Max: 0.48 Min: 0.47 / Avg: 0.48 / Max: 0.48 Min: 0.31 / Avg: 0.31 / Max: 0.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lrt -lpthread -lm
XZ Compression This test measures the time needed to compress a sample file (an Ubuntu file-system image) using XZ compression. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 70.17 70.68 70.81 70.51 106.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -O2 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 2.0 18.4 27.7 Ondemand 1.9 18.4 24.3 Conservative 2.1 17.8 23.9 Schedutil 2.1 18.5 28.4 Powersave 1.8 5.6 7.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 686 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 695 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 670 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 691 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 313 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 66.5 90.7 94.4 Ondemand 67.8 90.1 92.5 Conservative 66.0 91.7 94.5 Schedutil 67.5 91.1 94.8 Powersave 39.5 43.5 44.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 64.0 75.2 78.0 Ondemand 64.0 74.9 78.0 Conservative 64.0 75.5 78.0 Schedutil 63.0 74.8 77.0 Powersave 38.0 41.6 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 66.0 90.4 94.0 Ondemand 67.0 89.3 92.0 Conservative 66.0 91.2 94.0 Schedutil 68.0 90.8 94.0 Powersave 39.0 43.1 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 69.91 / Avg: 70.17 / Max: 70.36 Min: 70.05 / Avg: 70.68 / Max: 71.06 Min: 70.38 / Avg: 70.81 / Max: 71.12 Min: 70.11 / Avg: 70.51 / Max: 70.82 Min: 106.57 / Avg: 106.81 / Max: 107.05 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -O2
Darktable Darktable is an open-source photography / workflow application this will use any system-installed Darktable program or on Windows will automatically download the pre-built binary from the project. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 4 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 15.68 15.78 15.90 15.74 23.16 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Ondemand 1.8 17.5 25.9 Conservative 1.7 17.3 26.4 Schedutil 1.7 17.4 25.7 Powersave 1.6 6.8 9.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40 1. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 184 Joules per run. 2. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 184 Joules per run. 3. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 183 Joules per run. 4. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 99 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 48.3 74.4 88.0 Conservative 48.5 74.1 87.1 Schedutil 47.5 74.3 87.5 Powersave 35.3 41.7 44.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 46.0 59.7 67.0 Conservative 47.0 59.2 67.0 Schedutil 46.0 59.7 68.0 Powersave 34.0 39.1 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Ondemand 48.0 73.7 88.0 Conservative 48.0 73.4 87.0 Schedutil 47.0 73.7 85.0 Powersave 35.0 41.4 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 3.0.2 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 15.62 / Avg: 15.68 / Max: 15.72 Min: 15.7 / Avg: 15.77 / Max: 15.83 Min: 15.85 / Avg: 15.9 / Max: 15.94 Min: 15.67 / Avg: 15.74 / Max: 15.8 Min: 23.13 / Avg: 23.16 / Max: 23.19
DeepSpeech Mozilla DeepSpeech is a speech-to-text engine powered by TensorFlow for machine learning and derived from Baidu's Deep Speech research paper. This test profile times the speech-to-text process for a roughly three minute audio recording. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 1.31, N = 3 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 1.22, N = 6 68.07 73.94 81.71 89.02 100.05 Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 8.8 10.8 Ondemand 1.8 7.8 8.8 Conservative 1.8 6.5 8.4 Schedutil 1.7 6.0 7.5 Powersave 1.5 5.0 6.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 274 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 255 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 232 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 234 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 220 Joules per run. Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 66.1 75.1 83.9 Ondemand 65.3 72.3 83.9 Conservative 61.9 68.2 82.6 Schedutil 54.9 64.0 81.6 Powersave 40.0 42.1 43.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 61.0 64.8 68.0 Ondemand 57.0 61.4 66.0 Conservative 55.0 58.8 65.0 Schedutil 51.0 55.6 66.0 Powersave 39.0 40.1 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 66.0 74.8 84.0 Ondemand 64.0 71.5 81.0 Conservative 61.0 67.8 83.0 Schedutil 55.0 63.5 81.0 Powersave 40.0 41.7 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 67.89 / Avg: 68.07 / Max: 68.19 Min: 73.77 / Avg: 73.94 / Max: 74.08 Min: 79.68 / Avg: 81.71 / Max: 84.15 Min: 88.58 / Avg: 89.02 / Max: 89.47 Min: 98.54 / Avg: 100.05 / Max: 106.14
NeatBench NeatBench is a benchmark of the cross-platform Neat Video software on the CPU and optional GPU (OpenCL / CUDA) support. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better NeatBench 5 Acceleration: CPU Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.02, N = 8 SE +/- 0.03, N = 8 SE +/- 0.03, N = 8 SE +/- 0.03, N = 8 SE +/- 0.01, N = 5 8.30 8.27 8.07 8.24 5.68 FPS Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better NeatBench 5 Acceleration: CPU Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.2948 0.5896 0.8844 1.1792 1.474 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.86 1.31 Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 10.0 26.2 Ondemand 1.7 9.9 25.7 Conservative 1.7 9.6 25.4 Schedutil 1.7 9.6 26.0 Powersave 1.7 4.3 8.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NeatBench 5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 42 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 41 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 42 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 42 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 29 Joules per run. Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 47.1 67.8 76.0 Ondemand 47.0 67.8 73.9 Conservative 48.3 69.4 75.8 Schedutil 47.5 69.2 75.0 Powersave 35.6 38.2 41.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NeatBench 5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 46.0 50.3 56.0 Ondemand 46.0 50.0 55.0 Conservative 47.0 51.3 57.0 Schedutil 46.0 50.1 55.0 Powersave 34.0 36.0 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NeatBench 5 GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 47.0 67.3 76.0 Ondemand 47.0 67.1 72.0 Conservative 48.0 68.9 75.0 Schedutil 47.0 68.5 74.0 Powersave 35.0 37.7 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NeatBench 5 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better NeatBench 5 Acceleration: CPU Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 Min: 8.24 / Avg: 8.3 / Max: 8.39 Min: 8.15 / Avg: 8.27 / Max: 8.38 Min: 7.97 / Avg: 8.07 / Max: 8.21 Min: 8.09 / Avg: 8.24 / Max: 8.33 Min: 5.66 / Avg: 5.68 / Max: 5.69
Selenium This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 7 5.2 6.2 6.8 6.2 7.5 1. firefox 77.0.1 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 4.9 13.9 Ondemand 1.6 4.4 11.8 Conservative 1.7 4.1 10.6 Schedutil 1.8 4.2 12.6 Powersave 1.7 3.4 5.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 62 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 58 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 55 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 53 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 54 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.8 52.7 62.6 Ondemand 42.5 50.3 63.6 Conservative 42.5 49.1 59.4 Schedutil 42.9 51.0 62.0 Powersave 35.3 36.0 37.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 43.6 49.0 Ondemand 40.0 41.7 44.0 Conservative 40.0 41.1 43.0 Schedutil 40.0 41.7 44.0 Powersave 33.0 34.1 35.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 52.7 63.0 Ondemand 42.0 49.6 60.0 Conservative 42.0 48.8 60.0 Schedutil 42.0 50.6 60.0 Powersave 35.0 35.5 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 Min: 5.1 / Avg: 5.17 / Max: 5.2 Min: 6.1 / Avg: 6.23 / Max: 6.4 Min: 6.7 / Avg: 6.83 / Max: 6.9 Min: 6.1 / Avg: 6.17 / Max: 6.2 Min: 7.3 / Avg: 7.47 / Max: 7.9 1. firefox 77.0.1
Xonotic This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.76, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.75, N = 3 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 127.79 123.38 122.40 126.54 93.00 MIN: 35 / MAX: 230 MIN: 33 / MAX: 217 MIN: 34 / MAX: 216 MIN: 35 / MAX: 222 MIN: 20 / MAX: 185 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 7.17 7.80 7.65 7.36 9.74 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 17.8 27.5 Ondemand 1.9 15.8 21.1 Conservative 2.0 16.0 20.5 Schedutil 1.7 17.2 22.4 Powersave 2.0 9.6 15.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 826 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 759 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 773 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 808 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 637 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 59.8 79.3 93.3 Ondemand 55.4 73.0 82.4 Conservative 56.5 77.3 92.5 Schedutil 59.4 80.1 94.3 Powersave 45.1 52.1 56.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 56.0 70.0 77.0 Ondemand 52.0 65.3 71.0 Conservative 55.0 68.4 75.0 Schedutil 57.0 70.6 78.0 Powersave 43.0 51.1 56.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 60.0 78.8 93.0 Ondemand 55.0 72.4 83.0 Conservative 56.0 76.7 90.0 Schedutil 60.0 79.6 95.0 Powersave 45.0 51.7 56.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 126.61 / Avg: 127.79 / Max: 129.21 Min: 122.8 / Avg: 123.38 / Max: 123.77 Min: 120.91 / Avg: 122.4 / Max: 123.34 Min: 125.83 / Avg: 126.54 / Max: 127.45 Min: 92.83 / Avg: 93 / Max: 93.13
Zstd Compression This test measures the time needed to compress a sample file (an Ubuntu ISO) using Zstd compression. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 8.45, N = 3 SE +/- 17.35, N = 3 SE +/- 8.31, N = 3 SE +/- 11.10, N = 3 SE +/- 4.80, N = 3 2419.2 2394.6 2360.5 2398.8 1861.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma MB/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 90 180 270 360 450 256.31 253.97 261.67 266.81 412.39 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 9.4 19.1 Ondemand 1.8 9.4 19.2 Conservative 1.8 9.0 18.6 Schedutil 1.8 9.0 19.5 Powersave 1.7 4.5 7.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 164 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 163 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 159 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 156 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 95 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 51.4 67.2 76.0 Ondemand 50.8 66.1 74.6 Conservative 50.4 66.2 74.5 Schedutil 53.3 68.8 75.9 Powersave 37.5 39.5 41.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 50.0 54.6 58.0 Ondemand 50.0 53.7 59.0 Conservative 49.0 53.1 58.0 Schedutil 52.0 55.9 61.0 Powersave 36.0 37.5 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 51.0 66.6 76.0 Ondemand 50.0 65.8 74.0 Conservative 50.0 65.9 74.0 Schedutil 53.0 68.4 76.0 Powersave 37.0 39.0 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 400 800 1200 1600 2000 Min: 2402.6 / Avg: 2419.17 / Max: 2430.3 Min: 2359.9 / Avg: 2394.6 / Max: 2412.5 Min: 2344.3 / Avg: 2360.53 / Max: 2371.7 Min: 2376.8 / Avg: 2398.77 / Max: 2412.5 Min: 1855.9 / Avg: 1861.33 / Max: 1870.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
C-Blosc A simple, compressed, fast and persistent data store library for C. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 Compressor: blosclz Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 4.59, N = 3 SE +/- 8.50, N = 3 SE +/- 8.50, N = 3 SE +/- 12.47, N = 3 SE +/- 1.61, N = 3 5147.0 5009.5 4866.3 4804.4 3988.4 1. (CXX) g++ options: -rdynamic MB/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 Compressor: blosclz Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 200 400 600 800 1000 587.00 583.69 599.84 655.14 828.45 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 8.8 14.8 Ondemand 1.8 8.6 14.8 Conservative 1.8 8.1 14.4 Schedutil 1.9 7.3 13.6 Powersave 1.7 4.8 6.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 105 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 106 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 103 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 93 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 71 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 65.0 70.7 74.3 Ondemand 64.6 69.6 74.9 Conservative 64.9 69.8 74.4 Schedutil 63.3 69.1 79.4 Powersave 39.8 41.4 42.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 59.0 62.1 66.0 Ondemand 58.0 61.7 64.0 Conservative 58.0 61.9 67.0 Schedutil 58.0 60.6 65.0 Powersave 38.0 39.6 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 64.0 70.1 73.0 Ondemand 65.0 69.4 75.0 Conservative 65.0 69.4 74.0 Schedutil 62.0 68.5 80.0 Powersave 39.0 41.0 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 Compressor: blosclz Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 Min: 5138.6 / Avg: 5147.03 / Max: 5154.4 Min: 4995.3 / Avg: 5009.47 / Max: 5024.7 Min: 4852.5 / Avg: 4866.33 / Max: 4881.8 Min: 4779.5 / Avg: 4804.4 / Max: 4818.1 Min: 3985.3 / Avg: 3988.4 / Max: 3990.7 1. (CXX) g++ options: -rdynamic
Zstd Compression This test measures the time needed to compress a sample file (an Ubuntu ISO) using Zstd compression. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 19 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 16.1 16.0 16.0 16.1 12.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma MB/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 19 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.4838 0.9676 1.4514 1.9352 2.419 0.88 0.86 0.89 0.89 2.15 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.9 18.2 22.9 Ondemand 1.8 18.6 22.4 Conservative 1.9 18.1 22.3 Schedutil 1.8 18.2 22.5 Powersave 1.8 5.8 7.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 1374 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 1404 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 1374 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 1375 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 568 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 49.8 82.1 97.6 Ondemand 49.3 83.6 99.5 Conservative 55.4 82.4 94.6 Schedutil 50.3 84.4 97.6 Powersave 37.3 43.2 44.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 48.0 70.0 78.0 Ondemand 48.0 70.4 78.0 Conservative 48.0 69.9 78.0 Schedutil 49.0 70.5 77.0 Powersave 36.0 41.5 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 49.0 81.7 98.0 Ondemand 49.0 83.2 100.0 Conservative 55.0 81.9 94.0 Schedutil 50.0 83.9 98.0 Powersave 37.0 42.8 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 19 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 4 8 12 16 20 Min: 16.1 / Avg: 16.13 / Max: 16.2 Min: 16 / Avg: 16.03 / Max: 16.1 Min: 16 / Avg: 16.03 / Max: 16.1 Min: 16 / Avg: 16.07 / Max: 16.1 Min: 12.5 / Avg: 12.5 / Max: 12.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
Selenium This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 2.48, N = 3 SE +/- 4.16, N = 3 SE +/- 14.23, N = 3 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 934.1 1004.7 1164.8 963.9 1. firefox 77.0.1 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 6.2 13.9 Ondemand 1.5 5.7 12.7 Conservative 1.8 5.1 9.4 Schedutil 1.6 6.0 13.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 111 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 117 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 111 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 116 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 46.6 61.4 73.0 Ondemand 47.3 60.5 70.1 Conservative 47.0 59.4 67.8 Schedutil 46.3 60.2 69.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 47.9 53.0 Ondemand 45.0 47.5 51.0 Conservative 45.0 47.0 51.0 Schedutil 45.0 46.8 51.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 46.0 61.1 73.0 Ondemand 47.0 60.0 70.0 Conservative 47.0 59.0 68.0 Schedutil 46.0 59.9 70.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil 200 400 600 800 1000 Min: 930.2 / Avg: 934.07 / Max: 938.7 Min: 996.5 / Avg: 1004.73 / Max: 1009.9 Min: 1142.4 / Avg: 1164.77 / Max: 1191.2 Min: 961.7 / Avg: 963.9 / Max: 966.3 1. firefox 77.0.1
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 7.97, N = 3 SE +/- 14.64, N = 3 SE +/- 20.77, N = 8 SE +/- 12.66, N = 3 1685 1801 2008 1854 1. firefox 77.0.1 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 8.5 19.9 Ondemand 1.7 7.7 18.7 Conservative 1.7 7.0 17.2 Schedutil 1.7 7.9 17.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 121 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 119 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 119 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 121 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.8 62.2 69.5 Ondemand 42.8 58.3 69.3 Conservative 42.5 57.4 64.8 Schedutil 42.5 58.8 67.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 48.5 52.0 Ondemand 42.0 46.2 50.0 Conservative 41.0 45.8 50.0 Schedutil 41.0 45.8 49.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 61.5 69.0 Ondemand 42.0 57.7 66.0 Conservative 42.0 56.8 64.0 Schedutil 42.0 58.6 67.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 Min: 1675 / Avg: 1685.33 / Max: 1701 Min: 1783 / Avg: 1801 / Max: 1830 Min: 1934 / Avg: 2008.13 / Max: 2114 Min: 1838 / Avg: 1854 / Max: 1879 1. firefox 77.0.1
Tesseract Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 SE +/- 0.40, N = 3 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 97.14 106.44 110.93 94.50 108.72 Frames Per Second Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 3 6 9 12 15 10.21 10.36 10.34 10.51 10.70 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.8 9.5 13.9 Ondemand 1.8 10.3 13.4 Conservative 1.7 10.7 15.1 Schedutil 1.8 9.0 13.9 Powersave 1.9 10.2 14.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 174 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 192 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 204 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 165 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 207 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 41.1 50.5 62.0 Ondemand 39.8 50.2 62.3 Conservative 42.6 53.0 66.4 Schedutil 42.0 51.1 63.5 Powersave 37.0 47.1 51.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 40.0 47.4 52.0 Ondemand 39.0 47.0 51.0 Conservative 41.0 51.0 58.0 Schedutil 41.0 48.2 54.0 Powersave 35.0 46.7 53.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 41.0 50.2 62.0 Ondemand 39.0 49.8 62.0 Conservative 42.0 52.7 66.0 Schedutil 42.0 50.7 63.0 Powersave 37.0 46.6 51.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 95.84 / Avg: 97.14 / Max: 99.38 Min: 105.84 / Avg: 106.44 / Max: 107.38 Min: 110.15 / Avg: 110.93 / Max: 111.45 Min: 93.78 / Avg: 94.5 / Max: 95.76 Min: 108.14 / Avg: 108.72 / Max: 109.65
LevelDB LevelDB is a key-value storage library developed by Google that supports making use of Snappy for data compression and has other modern features. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.05, N = 11 SE +/- 5.82, N = 15 SE +/- 7.05, N = 15 SE +/- 7.79, N = 11 SE +/- 5.86, N = 15 1619.37 1854.20 1879.93 1726.10 1850.91 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 2.4 4.1 Ondemand 1.6 2.4 3.8 Conservative 1.5 2.4 3.8 Schedutil 1.7 2.4 3.9 Powersave 1.4 2.5 4.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 1.3451 2.6902 4.0353 5.3804 6.7255 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 7 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 7 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 7 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 7 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 8 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 43.8 45.3 47.3 Ondemand 41.8 43.4 46.8 Conservative 42.8 44.6 47.8 Schedutil 42.0 43.9 46.3 Powersave 36.5 37.0 37.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 44.1 46.0 Ondemand 40.0 42.4 46.0 Conservative 41.0 43.7 47.0 Schedutil 41.0 42.7 45.0 Powersave 34.0 35.3 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 43.0 45.0 47.0 Ondemand 41.0 43.0 46.0 Conservative 42.0 44.2 48.0 Schedutil 42.0 43.5 46.0 Powersave 36.0 36.4 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 System Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 300 600 900 1200 1500 Min: 1589.98 / Avg: 1619.37 / Max: 1634.55 Min: 1809.8 / Avg: 1854.2 / Max: 1891.44 Min: 1837.38 / Avg: 1879.93 / Max: 1928.51 Min: 1692.28 / Avg: 1726.1 / Max: 1766.52 Min: 1819.04 / Avg: 1850.91 / Max: 1900.99 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
ParaView This test runs ParaView benchmarks: an open-source data analytics and visualization application. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 8.99, N = 15 SE +/- 1.72, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 9.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 801.92 880.18 884.38 860.57 884.13 MiPolys / Sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 50 100 150 200 250 120.03 132.50 135.62 125.41 221.70 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.5 6.7 17.5 Ondemand 1.9 6.6 10.6 Conservative 1.9 6.5 10.1 Schedutil 1.9 6.9 10.3 Powersave 1.5 4.0 12.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 78 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 80 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 78 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 82 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 96 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 58.4 69.2 86.8 Ondemand 54.3 70.6 80.8 Conservative 58.0 71.4 81.5 Schedutil 63.0 74.1 82.8 Powersave 42.6 44.3 47.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 47.0 52.3 63.0 Ondemand 50.0 52.9 58.0 Conservative 53.0 56.3 62.0 Schedutil 53.0 58.7 64.0 Powersave 40.0 42.3 47.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 58.0 68.8 86.0 Ondemand 54.0 70.3 80.0 Conservative 58.0 71.1 81.0 Schedutil 60.0 73.4 82.0 Powersave 42.0 43.9 47.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 160 320 480 640 800 Min: 761.11 / Avg: 801.91 / Max: 873.05 Min: 876.74 / Avg: 880.18 / Max: 882.03 Min: 884.27 / Avg: 884.38 / Max: 884.57 Min: 851.02 / Avg: 860.57 / Max: 878.61 Min: 883.17 / Avg: 884.13 / Max: 884.76
IOR IOR is a parallel I/O storage benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOR 3.2.1 Read Test Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 1.23, N = 15 SE +/- 1.08, N = 14 SE +/- 1.95, N = 13 SE +/- 0.51, N = 15 SE +/- 1.21, N = 13 657.11 630.74 618.96 659.36 621.14 MIN: 133.17 / MAX: 715.56 MIN: 132.73 / MAX: 671.22 MIN: 134.28 / MAX: 664.39 MIN: 132.18 / MAX: 692.47 MIN: 133.85 / MAX: 657.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -pthread -lmpi MB/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better IOR 3.2.1 Read Test Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 70 140 210 280 350 309.80 282.84 238.03 297.31 226.88 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 2.1 3.4 Ondemand 1.8 2.2 3.5 Conservative 1.5 2.6 5.5 Schedutil 1.7 2.2 3.5 Powersave 1.8 2.7 4.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better IOR 3.2.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 2.04 4.08 6.12 8.16 10.2 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 5 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 5 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 6 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 5 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 7 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 34.8 34.9 35.0 Ondemand 34.5 35.1 41.4 Conservative 37.5 40.3 52.4 Schedutil 36.3 36.5 36.8 Powersave 35.8 36.5 37.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IOR 3.2.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 33.0 33.2 34.0 Ondemand 32.0 33.1 34.0 Conservative 36.0 37.5 40.0 Schedutil 34.0 34.9 36.0 Powersave 34.0 34.8 36.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IOR 3.2.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 11 22 33 44 55 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 34.0 34.4 35.0 Ondemand 34.0 34.5 41.0 Conservative 37.0 39.9 52.0 Schedutil 36.0 36.0 36.0 Powersave 35.0 36.1 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better IOR 3.2.1 System Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOR 3.2.1 Read Test Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 120 240 360 480 600 Min: 647.91 / Avg: 657.11 / Max: 663.82 Min: 623.67 / Avg: 630.74 / Max: 638.75 Min: 610.28 / Avg: 618.96 / Max: 635.43 Min: 655.64 / Avg: 659.36 / Max: 663.07 Min: 609.46 / Avg: 621.14 / Max: 626.11 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm -pthread -lmpi
ACES DGEMM This is a multi-threaded DGEMM benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.1001 0.2002 0.3003 0.4004 0.5005 SE +/- 0.001551, N = 3 SE +/- 0.002520, N = 3 SE +/- 0.000128, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001306, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001629, N = 3 0.438860 0.444788 0.435040 0.439888 0.421760 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp GFLOP/s Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s Per Watt, More Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 0.0158 0.0316 0.0474 0.0632 0.079 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.07 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.5 19.3 22.7 Ondemand 1.8 19.3 22.2 Conservative 2.0 18.6 22.3 Schedutil 1.9 19.3 22.3 Powersave 1.4 5.9 7.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 5132 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 5064 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 4994 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 5132 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 1645 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 55.5 89.7 92.0 Ondemand 56.6 90.2 92.0 Conservative 57.5 90.4 92.0 Schedutil 56.0 90.3 94.3 Powersave 39.8 45.6 46.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 55.0 77.4 81.0 Ondemand 56.0 77.9 81.0 Conservative 56.0 78.3 82.0 Schedutil 55.0 77.8 80.0 Powersave 38.0 44.0 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 GPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 55.0 89.2 92.0 Ondemand 56.0 89.7 92.0 Conservative 57.0 89.9 92.0 Schedutil 56.0 89.8 94.0 Powersave 39.0 45.2 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 1 2 3 4 5 Min: 0.44 / Avg: 0.44 / Max: 0.44 Min: 0.44 / Avg: 0.44 / Max: 0.45 Min: 0.43 / Avg: 0.44 / Max: 0.44 Min: 0.44 / Avg: 0.44 / Max: 0.44 Min: 0.42 / Avg: 0.42 / Max: 0.42 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius System Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 34 / Avg: 75.58 / Max: 103 Min: 34 / Avg: 76.94 / Max: 102 Min: 36 / Avg: 76.41 / Max: 103 Min: 36 / Avg: 78.46 / Max: 102 Min: 34 / Avg: 42.42 / Max: 56
GPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius GPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 16 32 48 64 80 Min: 33 / Avg: 62.71 / Max: 81 Min: 32 / Avg: 63.52 / Max: 81 Min: 34 / Avg: 63.18 / Max: 82 Min: 34 / Avg: 64.27 / Max: 80 Min: 33 / Avg: 40.57 / Max: 56
CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 34.75 / Avg: 76.02 / Max: 103.5 Min: 34.5 / Avg: 77.35 / Max: 103.25 Min: 36.5 / Avg: 76.84 / Max: 103 Min: 36.25 / Avg: 78.86 / Max: 101.88 Min: 34.5 / Avg: 42.83 / Max: 56.38
CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 1.29 / Avg: 13.14 / Max: 29.96 Min: 1.38 / Avg: 13.71 / Max: 30.03 Min: 1.3 / Avg: 13.26 / Max: 30.08 Min: 1.34 / Avg: 14.1 / Max: 30.09 Min: 1.23 / Avg: 5.55 / Max: 15.44
Selenium OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 14 28 42 56 70 Min: 44 / Avg: 58.4 / Max: 72 Min: 42 / Avg: 52.85 / Max: 65 Min: 39 / Avg: 47.98 / Max: 60 Min: 41 / Avg: 52.37 / Max: 64 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.89 / Max: 40
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium GPU Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 43 / Avg: 48.26 / Max: 53 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.82 / Max: 49 Min: 38 / Avg: 42 / Max: 46 Min: 40 / Avg: 44.41 / Max: 48 Min: 34 / Avg: 37.76 / Max: 40
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 14 28 42 56 70 Min: 44.25 / Avg: 58.84 / Max: 72.75 Min: 42.25 / Avg: 53.3 / Max: 65 Min: 39.13 / Avg: 48.41 / Max: 60.63 Min: 41 / Avg: 52.82 / Max: 64.5 Min: 36.25 / Avg: 39.32 / Max: 40.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 4 8 12 16 20 Min: 1.42 / Avg: 6.98 / Max: 15.31 Min: 1.68 / Avg: 5.71 / Max: 12.39 Min: 1.51 / Avg: 4.76 / Max: 11.03 Min: 1.55 / Avg: 5.79 / Max: 13.22 Min: 1.74 / Avg: 4.02 / Max: 5.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 5 10 15 20 25 18.67 8.21 8.18 8.26 11.64
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 4.68, N = 9 SE +/- 2.67, N = 9 SE +/- 2.09, N = 9 SE +/- 3.43, N = 6 SE +/- 0.90, N = 9 130.31 46.91 38.93 47.83 46.80 1. firefox 77.0.1 Score Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 5 10 15 20 25 18.67 8.21 8.18 8.26 11.64 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 4 8 12 16 20 Min: 1.42 / Avg: 6.98 / Max: 15.31 Min: 1.68 / Avg: 5.71 / Max: 12.39 Min: 1.51 / Avg: 4.76 / Max: 11.03 Min: 1.55 / Avg: 5.79 / Max: 13.22 Min: 1.74 / Avg: 4.02 / Max: 5.83 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 1178 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 972 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 816 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 991 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 706 Joules per run. CPU Temp
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 14 28 42 56 70 Min: 44.25 / Avg: 58.84 / Max: 72.75 Min: 42.25 / Avg: 53.3 / Max: 65 Min: 39.13 / Avg: 48.41 / Max: 60.63 Min: 41 / Avg: 52.82 / Max: 64.5 Min: 36.25 / Avg: 39.32 / Max: 40.75 GPU Temp
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium GPU Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 11 22 33 44 55 Min: 43 / Avg: 48.26 / Max: 53 Min: 41 / Avg: 44.82 / Max: 49 Min: 38 / Avg: 42 / Max: 46 Min: 40 / Avg: 44.41 / Max: 48 Min: 34 / Avg: 37.76 / Max: 40 System Temp
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 14 28 42 56 70 Min: 44 / Avg: 58.4 / Max: 72 Min: 42 / Avg: 52.85 / Max: 65 Min: 39 / Avg: 47.98 / Max: 60 Min: 41 / Avg: 52.37 / Max: 64 Min: 36 / Avg: 38.89 / Max: 40 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 114.09 / Avg: 130.31 / Max: 157.66 Min: 37.79 / Avg: 46.91 / Max: 63.38 Min: 29.97 / Avg: 38.93 / Max: 50.13 Min: 38.81 / Avg: 47.83 / Max: 60.73 Min: 42.82 / Avg: 46.8 / Max: 50.55 1. firefox 77.0.1
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 55.3 66.0 Ondemand 44.0 51.0 63.0 Conservative 40.0 43.6 60.0 Schedutil 42.0 51.0 66.0 Powersave 35.0 37.0 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 46.6 50.0 Ondemand 42.0 44.0 47.0 Conservative 38.0 40.4 47.0 Schedutil 40.0 43.2 48.0 Powersave 34.0 35.5 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
Min Avg Max Performance 45.1 55.7 65.6 Ondemand 44.3 51.4 63.3 Conservative 40.8 44.0 61.9 Schedutil 42.8 51.4 65.4 Powersave 35.9 37.4 38.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 5.6 13.4 Ondemand 1.7 4.7 13.2 Conservative 1.7 3.8 11.4 Schedutil 1.6 5.0 13.4 Powersave 1.8 3.8 5.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20
OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 1939.65 2116.23 1911.30 2074.91 1633.51
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 118.95, N = 3 SE +/- 75.54, N = 3 SE +/- 191.73, N = 12 SE +/- 112.68, N = 15 SE +/- 42.06, N = 3 10905 10039 7338 10478 6137 1. firefox 77.0.1 Score Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 1939.65 2116.23 1911.30 2074.91 1633.51 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 5.6 13.4 Ondemand 1.7 4.7 13.2 Conservative 1.7 3.8 11.4 Schedutil 1.6 5.0 13.4 Powersave 1.8 3.8 5.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 358 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 286 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 418 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 309 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 172 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.1 55.7 65.6 Ondemand 44.3 51.4 63.3 Conservative 40.8 44.0 61.9 Schedutil 42.8 51.4 65.4 Powersave 35.9 37.4 38.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 44.0 46.6 50.0 Ondemand 42.0 44.0 47.0 Conservative 38.0 40.4 47.0 Schedutil 40.0 43.2 48.0 Powersave 34.0 35.5 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 55.3 66.0 Ondemand 44.0 51.0 63.0 Conservative 40.0 43.6 60.0 Schedutil 42.0 51.0 66.0 Powersave 35.0 37.0 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K Min: 10718 / Avg: 10905.33 / Max: 11126 Min: 9927 / Avg: 10039.33 / Max: 10183 Min: 6654 / Avg: 7338.42 / Max: 9360 Min: 9865 / Avg: 10478 / Max: 11659 Min: 6054 / Avg: 6137.33 / Max: 6189 1. firefox 77.0.1
LevelDB Min Avg Max Performance 46.0 64.7 73.0 Ondemand 45.0 54.9 62.0 Conservative 46.0 61.3 71.0 Schedutil 45.0 62.9 73.0 Powersave 36.0 37.3 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 51.6 56.0 Ondemand 43.0 44.4 46.0 Conservative 45.0 49.9 55.0 Schedutil 44.0 50.1 55.0 Powersave 34.0 35.9 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Min Avg Max Performance 46.5 65.5 73.0 Ondemand 45.0 55.6 62.4 Conservative 46.8 61.7 71.4 Schedutil 45.5 63.6 72.6 Powersave 36.4 37.7 38.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 11.7 17.5 Ondemand 1.7 5.5 7.6 Conservative 1.5 7.9 16.5 Schedutil 1.7 10.8 15.8 Powersave 1.9 4.5 5.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.04, N = 6 SE +/- 0.09, N = 4 SE +/- 0.81, N = 15 SE +/- 0.15, N = 5 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 16.68 31.27 30.25 19.23 40.77 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.7 11.7 17.5 Ondemand 1.7 5.5 7.6 Conservative 1.5 7.9 16.5 Schedutil 1.7 10.8 15.8 Powersave 1.9 4.5 5.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 74 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 53 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 76 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 75 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 56 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 46.5 65.5 73.0 Ondemand 45.0 55.6 62.4 Conservative 46.8 61.7 71.4 Schedutil 45.5 63.6 72.6 Powersave 36.4 37.7 38.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 51.6 56.0 Ondemand 43.0 44.4 46.0 Conservative 45.0 49.9 55.0 Schedutil 44.0 50.1 55.0 Powersave 34.0 35.9 37.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 GPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 46.0 64.7 73.0 Ondemand 45.0 54.9 62.0 Conservative 46.0 61.3 71.0 Schedutil 45.0 62.9 73.0 Powersave 36.0 37.3 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 16.55 / Avg: 16.68 / Max: 16.84 Min: 31.08 / Avg: 31.27 / Max: 31.49 Min: 25.07 / Avg: 30.25 / Max: 34.65 Min: 18.82 / Avg: 19.23 / Max: 19.65 Min: 40.71 / Avg: 40.76 / Max: 40.86 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
Min Avg Max Performance 43.0 55.4 63.0 Ondemand 40.0 46.5 52.0 Conservative 43.0 48.8 56.0 Schedutil 42.0 55.7 65.0 Powersave 37.0 37.8 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 44.6 48.0 Ondemand 40.0 40.9 42.0 Conservative 42.0 43.6 47.0 Schedutil 41.0 43.9 47.0 Powersave 35.0 36.4 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
Min Avg Max Performance 43.8 55.6 63.5 Ondemand 40.6 46.6 52.3 Conservative 43.0 49.3 56.4 Schedutil 42.1 56.0 64.4 Powersave 37.0 38.2 39.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Performance 1.5 5.9 16.5 Ondemand 1.5 4.0 7.5 Conservative 1.6 4.4 12.7 Schedutil 1.5 6.0 14.3 Powersave 1.7 3.6 5.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.06, N = 11 SE +/- 0.17, N = 9 SE +/- 0.76, N = 15 SE +/- 0.18, N = 15 SE +/- 0.26, N = 8 17.73 32.83 36.67 21.63 43.00 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.5 5.9 16.5 Ondemand 1.5 4.0 7.5 Conservative 1.6 4.4 12.7 Schedutil 1.5 6.0 14.3 Powersave 1.7 3.6 5.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 18 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 15 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 17 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 19 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 15 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 43.8 55.6 63.5 Ondemand 40.6 46.6 52.3 Conservative 43.0 49.3 56.4 Schedutil 42.1 56.0 64.4 Powersave 37.0 38.2 39.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 44.6 48.0 Ondemand 40.0 40.9 42.0 Conservative 42.0 43.6 47.0 Schedutil 41.0 43.9 47.0 Powersave 35.0 36.4 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 43.0 55.4 63.0 Ondemand 40.0 46.5 52.0 Conservative 43.0 48.8 56.0 Schedutil 42.0 55.7 65.0 Powersave 37.0 37.8 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 17.36 / Avg: 17.73 / Max: 17.94 Min: 31.76 / Avg: 32.83 / Max: 33.5 Min: 31.15 / Avg: 36.67 / Max: 40.03 Min: 20.6 / Avg: 21.63 / Max: 22.73 Min: 42.09 / Avg: 43 / Max: 43.7 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 54.9 62.0 Ondemand 40.0 46.7 53.0 Conservative 41.0 50.8 59.0 Schedutil 40.0 54.4 62.0 Powersave 36.0 36.9 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Performance 41.0 44.4 49.0 Ondemand 39.0 41.0 43.0 Conservative 40.0 43.9 47.0 Schedutil 39.0 43.6 48.0 Powersave 34.0 35.8 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
Min Avg Max Performance 42.4 55.5 63.6 Ondemand 40.3 46.9 52.5 Conservative 41.8 51.7 58.6 Schedutil 40.5 54.8 61.9 Powersave 36.3 37.4 38.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 6.1 16.3 Ondemand 1.5 4.0 7.4 Conservative 1.7 4.9 12.2 Schedutil 1.6 5.9 14.5 Powersave 1.8 3.6 5.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.02, N = 11 SE +/- 0.11, N = 9 SE +/- 0.55, N = 15 SE +/- 0.23, N = 15 SE +/- 0.18, N = 8 17.66 33.33 34.88 21.54 43.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 6.1 16.3 Ondemand 1.5 4.0 7.4 Conservative 1.7 4.9 12.2 Schedutil 1.6 5.9 14.5 Powersave 1.8 3.6 5.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 18 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 15 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 19 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 18 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 15 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 42.4 55.5 63.6 Ondemand 40.3 46.9 52.5 Conservative 41.8 51.7 58.6 Schedutil 40.5 54.8 61.9 Powersave 36.3 37.4 38.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 41.0 44.4 49.0 Ondemand 39.0 41.0 43.0 Conservative 40.0 43.9 47.0 Schedutil 39.0 43.6 48.0 Powersave 34.0 35.8 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 GPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 54.9 62.0 Ondemand 40.0 46.7 53.0 Conservative 41.0 50.8 59.0 Schedutil 40.0 54.4 62.0 Powersave 36.0 36.9 38.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 17.5 / Avg: 17.66 / Max: 17.77 Min: 32.89 / Avg: 33.33 / Max: 34.01 Min: 31.77 / Avg: 34.88 / Max: 38.48 Min: 19.86 / Avg: 21.54 / Max: 22.94 Min: 42.16 / Avg: 43.37 / Max: 43.78 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
Java Gradle Build OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java Gradle Build System Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 61 / Avg: 80.82 / Max: 97 Min: 64 / Avg: 80.45 / Max: 98 Min: 62 / Avg: 78.08 / Max: 98 Min: 62 / Avg: 78.68 / Max: 97 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.85 / Max: 45
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java Gradle Build GPU Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 15 30 45 60 75 Min: 57 / Avg: 64.96 / Max: 75 Min: 56 / Avg: 64.3 / Max: 75 Min: 54 / Avg: 62.7 / Max: 76 Min: 52 / Avg: 62.93 / Max: 74 Min: 35 / Avg: 38.2 / Max: 44
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java Gradle Build CPU Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 61.13 / Avg: 81.25 / Max: 97.63 Min: 63.75 / Avg: 80.84 / Max: 98 Min: 63.88 / Avg: 78.49 / Max: 98.63 Min: 64.75 / Avg: 79.13 / Max: 97.25 Min: 37.5 / Avg: 40.3 / Max: 45.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Java Gradle Build CPU Power Consumption Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 1.87 / Avg: 13.07 / Max: 29.03 Min: 1.84 / Avg: 12.78 / Max: 27.59 Min: 1.79 / Avg: 11.79 / Max: 27.86 Min: 1.85 / Avg: 12.03 / Max: 28.68 Min: 1.68 / Avg: 4.47 / Max: 8.18
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Java Gradle Build Gradle Build: Reactor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 2.92, N = 12 SE +/- 3.12, N = 12 SE +/- 2.87, N = 12 SE +/- 4.00, N = 12 SE +/- 6.81, N = 9 206.90 223.41 238.23 226.71 547.70 CPU Power Consumption
OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Java Gradle Build CPU Power Consumption Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 6 12 18 24 30 Min: 1.87 / Avg: 13.07 / Max: 29.03 Min: 1.84 / Avg: 12.78 / Max: 27.59 Min: 1.79 / Avg: 11.79 / Max: 27.86 Min: 1.85 / Avg: 12.03 / Max: 28.68 Min: 1.68 / Avg: 4.47 / Max: 8.18 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 1378 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 1453 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 1428 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 1387 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 1233 Joules per run. CPU Temp
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java Gradle Build CPU Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 61.13 / Avg: 81.25 / Max: 97.63 Min: 63.75 / Avg: 80.84 / Max: 98 Min: 63.88 / Avg: 78.49 / Max: 98.63 Min: 64.75 / Avg: 79.13 / Max: 97.25 Min: 37.5 / Avg: 40.3 / Max: 45.75 GPU Temp
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java Gradle Build GPU Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 15 30 45 60 75 Min: 57 / Avg: 64.96 / Max: 75 Min: 56 / Avg: 64.3 / Max: 75 Min: 54 / Avg: 62.7 / Max: 76 Min: 52 / Avg: 62.93 / Max: 74 Min: 35 / Avg: 38.2 / Max: 44 System Temp
OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java Gradle Build System Temperature Monitor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 61 / Avg: 80.82 / Max: 97 Min: 64 / Avg: 80.45 / Max: 98 Min: 62 / Avg: 78.08 / Max: 98 Min: 62 / Avg: 78.68 / Max: 97 Min: 37 / Avg: 39.85 / Max: 45 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Java Gradle Build Gradle Build: Reactor Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 190.16 / Avg: 206.9 / Max: 229.21 Min: 207.89 / Avg: 223.4 / Max: 251.75 Min: 228.12 / Avg: 238.23 / Max: 267.41 Min: 195.32 / Avg: 226.71 / Max: 257.3 Min: 522.6 / Avg: 547.7 / Max: 585.66
ParaView Min Avg Max Performance 41.0 56.6 65.0 Ondemand 40.0 56.5 65.0 Conservative 42.0 59.5 66.0 Schedutil 43.0 59.7 66.0 Powersave 37.0 38.2 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Performance 40.0 44.7 53.0 Ondemand 39.0 44.3 52.0 Conservative 41.0 45.4 52.0 Schedutil 42.0 45.9 53.0 Powersave 36.0 37.3 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Min Avg Max Performance 41.0 57.1 64.8 Ondemand 40.3 57.1 64.9 Conservative 42.8 60.1 66.5 Schedutil 43.0 60.3 66.4 Powersave 37.3 38.6 40.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 6.1 14.6 Ondemand 1.5 6.0 14.6 Conservative 1.7 5.6 13.5 Schedutil 1.6 6.1 15.2 Powersave 1.7 3.6 10.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 72.07 86.90 97.42 77.94 158.37
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 10.50, N = 15 SE +/- 8.30, N = 15 SE +/- 6.74, N = 15 SE +/- 11.23, N = 15 SE +/- 1.80, N = 4 437.66 521.22 545.98 477.49 565.60 MiPolys / Sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 40 80 120 160 200 72.07 86.90 97.42 77.94 158.37 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.6 6.1 14.6 Ondemand 1.5 6.0 14.6 Conservative 1.7 5.6 13.5 Schedutil 1.6 6.1 15.2 Powersave 1.7 3.6 10.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 31 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 30 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 29 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 31 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 34 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 41.0 57.1 64.8 Ondemand 40.3 57.1 64.9 Conservative 42.8 60.1 66.5 Schedutil 43.0 60.3 66.4 Powersave 37.3 38.6 40.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 40.0 44.7 53.0 Ondemand 39.0 44.3 52.0 Conservative 41.0 45.4 52.0 Schedutil 42.0 45.9 53.0 Powersave 36.0 37.3 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 41.0 56.6 65.0 Ondemand 40.0 56.5 65.0 Conservative 42.0 59.5 66.0 Schedutil 43.0 59.7 66.0 Powersave 37.0 38.2 40.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 369.73 / Avg: 437.66 / Max: 536.47 Min: 453.22 / Avg: 521.22 / Max: 558.59 Min: 477.01 / Avg: 545.98 / Max: 569.6 Min: 409.05 / Avg: 477.49 / Max: 536.97 Min: 562.66 / Avg: 565.6 / Max: 570.22
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 54.8 63.0 Ondemand 45.0 55.1 63.0 Conservative 48.0 58.7 69.0 Schedutil 49.0 58.5 67.0 Powersave 38.0 39.1 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 43.7 49.0 Ondemand 42.0 44.0 48.0 Conservative 44.0 45.9 50.0 Schedutil 44.0 46.5 51.0 Powersave 37.0 38.2 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Min Avg Max Performance 45.3 55.9 66.0 Ondemand 45.8 55.4 63.1 Conservative 48.5 58.8 68.8 Schedutil 48.9 59.2 67.3 Powersave 38.8 39.5 40.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Performance 1.5 4.2 11.2 Ondemand 1.8 4.2 9.1 Conservative 1.7 3.9 8.6 Schedutil 1.7 4.2 10.0 Powersave 1.5 3.2 7.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 70 140 210 280 350 225.46 224.52 234.76 216.03 302.04
Result
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 15.20, N = 15 SE +/- 9.89, N = 15 SE +/- 9.93, N = 15 SE +/- 22.53, N = 15 SE +/- 3.36, N = 7 942.94 933.38 925.80 898.71 954.64 MiVoxels / Sec Per Watt
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 70 140 210 280 350 225.46 224.52 234.76 216.03 302.04 CPU Power Consumption
Min Avg Max Performance 1.5 4.2 11.2 Ondemand 1.8 4.2 9.1 Conservative 1.7 3.9 8.6 Schedutil 1.7 4.2 10.0 Powersave 1.5 3.2 7.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 4 8 12 16 20 1. Performance: Approximate power consumption of 14 Joules per run. 2. Ondemand: Approximate power consumption of 14 Joules per run. 3. Conservative: Approximate power consumption of 13 Joules per run. 4. Schedutil: Approximate power consumption of 14 Joules per run. 5. Powersave: Approximate power consumption of 15 Joules per run. CPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.3 55.9 66.0 Ondemand 45.8 55.4 63.1 Conservative 48.5 58.8 68.8 Schedutil 48.9 59.2 67.3 Powersave 38.8 39.5 40.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 GPU Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 42.0 43.7 49.0 Ondemand 42.0 44.0 48.0 Conservative 44.0 45.9 50.0 Schedutil 44.0 46.5 51.0 Powersave 37.0 38.2 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 GPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75 System Temp
Min Avg Max Performance 45.0 54.8 63.0 Ondemand 45.0 55.1 63.0 Conservative 48.0 58.7 69.0 Schedutil 49.0 58.5 67.0 Powersave 38.0 39.1 41.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100 Result Confidence
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Performance Ondemand Conservative Schedutil Powersave 200 400 600 800 1000 Min: 820.54 / Avg: 942.94 / Max: 1026.07 Min: 826.88 / Avg: 933.38 / Max: 967.63 Min: 866.92 / Avg: 925.8 / Max: 986.05 Min: 790.37 / Avg: 898.71 / Max: 1079.93 Min: 945.83 / Avg: 954.64 / Max: 971.07
Performance Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vDisk Notes: NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rwProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance - CPU Microcode: 0x8600102Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-3ubuntu1)Python Notes: Python 3.8.3Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: disabled RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 14 July 2020 11:49 by user phoronix.
Ondemand Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vDisk Notes: NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rwProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand - CPU Microcode: 0x8600102Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-3ubuntu1)Python Notes: Python 3.8.3Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: disabled RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 15 July 2020 05:29 by user phoronix.
Conservative Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vDisk Notes: NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rwProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq conservative - CPU Microcode: 0x8600102Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-3ubuntu1)Python Notes: Python 3.8.3Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: disabled RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 15 July 2020 18:58 by user phoronix.
Schedutil Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vDisk Notes: NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rwProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil - CPU Microcode: 0x8600102Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-3ubuntu1)Python Notes: Python 3.8.3Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: disabled RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 16 July 2020 09:12 by user phoronix.
Powersave Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 4500U @ 2.38GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: LENOVO LNVNB161216 (EECN20WW BIOS), Chipset: AMD Renoir Root Complex, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB SKHynix_HFM256GDHTNI-87A0B, Graphics: AMD Renoir 512MB (1500/400MHz), Audio: AMD Device 1637, Network: Realtek RTL8822CE 802.11ac PCIe
OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-050800daily20200713-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vDisk Notes: NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rwProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq powersave - CPU Microcode: 0x8600102Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-3ubuntu1)Python Notes: Python 3.8.3Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: disabled RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 17 July 2020 05:59 by user phoronix.