Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 testing with a MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) v5.0 (P.50 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Xeon E5-2609 v4 Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 @ 1.70GHz (8 Cores)Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) v5.0 (P.50 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB CORSAIR FORCE LX, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I218-V
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-33-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -vProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0xb000038Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-3ubuntu1)Python Notes: Python 3.8.2Security Notes: itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of Split huge pages + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: disabled RSB filling + tsx_async_abort: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled
Ethr Ethr is a cross-platform Golang-written network performance measurement tool developed by Microsoft that is capable of testing multiple protocols and different measurements. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Xeon E5-2609 v4 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 30.13 MIN: 25.33 / MAX: 35.19
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 2 Xeon E5-2609 v4 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 30.04 MIN: 25.32 / MAX: 34.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 4 Xeon E5-2609 v4 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 30.12 MIN: 25.31 / MAX: 33.72
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Xeon E5-2609 v4 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 30.17 MIN: 25.43 / MAX: 36.72
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 16 Xeon E5-2609 v4 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 30.21 MIN: 25.49 / MAX: 34.03
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 2 Xeon E5-2609 v4 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 34.40, N = 3 27085.11 MIN: 26700 / MAX: 27460
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 4 Xeon E5-2609 v4 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 328.89, N = 3 48134.89 MIN: 44370 / MAX: 51550
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Xeon E5-2609 v4 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 177.76, N = 3 65227.11 MIN: 61560 / MAX: 67200
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 2 Xeon E5-2609 v4 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 4.82, N = 3 19044.00 MIN: 18980 / MAX: 19090
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 4 Xeon E5-2609 v4 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 95.26, N = 3 40864.89 MIN: 40520 / MAX: 41410
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Xeon E5-2609 v4 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 272.65, N = 3 71422.22 MIN: 68390 / MAX: 74670
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Xeon E5-2609 v4 50000M 100000M 150000M 200000M 250000M SE +/- 65105454443.14, N = 16 252151562752.15 MIN: 501.12 / MAX: 508160000000
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 2 Xeon E5-2609 v4 30000M 60000M 90000M 120000M 150000M SE +/- 47917423670.26, N = 16 155760078967.84 MAX: 999940000000
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 4 Xeon E5-2609 v4 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 3.54, N = 3 1858.54 MIN: 1820 / MAX: 1890
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Xeon E5-2609 v4 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 0.95, N = 3 2875.63 MIN: 2830 / MAX: 2930
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 16 Xeon E5-2609 v4 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 76.02, N = 3 69280.44 MIN: 66730 / MAX: 71510
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 16 Xeon E5-2609 v4 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K SE +/- 134.55, N = 3 75077.33 MIN: 68290 / MAX: 80710
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 16 Xeon E5-2609 v4 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 2.80, N = 3 3106.04 MIN: 3050 / MAX: 3150
OpenBenchmarking.org Connections/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Xeon E5-2609 v4 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 28.48, N = 3 4797
OpenBenchmarking.org Connections/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 2 Xeon E5-2609 v4 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 52.39, N = 3 9203
OpenBenchmarking.org Connections/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 4 Xeon E5-2609 v4 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 591.36, N = 15 17195
OpenBenchmarking.org Connections/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Xeon E5-2609 v4 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 136.50, N = 3 52760
OpenBenchmarking.org Connections/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 16 Xeon E5-2609 v4 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 5079.96, N = 12 28342
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: chacha Xeon E5-2609 v4 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 398.89 MIN: 200.79 / MAX: 1102.29 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lhogweed -lnettle -lgmp -lm -lcrypto
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: sha512 Xeon E5-2609 v4 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 202.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lhogweed -lnettle -lgmp -lm -lcrypto
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbyte/s, More Is Better Nettle 3.5.1 Test: poly1305-aes Xeon E5-2609 v4 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.43, N = 3 1102.41 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ggdb3 -lhogweed -lnettle -lgmp -lm -lcrypto
oneDNN MKL-DNN This is a test of the Intel oneDNN (formerly DNNL / Deep Neural Network Library / MKL-DNN) as an Intel-optimized library for Deep Neural Networks and making use of its built-in benchdnn functionality. The result is the total perf time reported. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 Xeon E5-2609 v4 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.03090, N = 3 8.55524 MIN: 8.35 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 Xeon E5-2609 v4 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 104.30 MIN: 103.8 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 Xeon E5-2609 v4 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.02549, N = 3 6.11580 MIN: 5.94 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32 Xeon E5-2609 v4 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 79.97 MIN: 79.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 Xeon E5-2609 v4 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 12.01 MIN: 11.74 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 Xeon E5-2609 v4 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 14.42 MIN: 14.21 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 Xeon E5-2609 v4 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 6.23, N = 3 435.17 MIN: 419.48 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 Xeon E5-2609 v4 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 11.82 MIN: 11.68 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 Xeon E5-2609 v4 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 483.77 MIN: 482.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 Xeon E5-2609 v4 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 61.54 MIN: 60.36 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -msse4.1 -fPIC -fopenmp -pie -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K Xeon E5-2609 v4 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 62.74 MIN: 58.68 / MAX: 70.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p Xeon E5-2609 v4 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.40, N = 3 186.81 MIN: 166.02 / MAX: 203.65 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit Xeon E5-2609 v4 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 41.08 MIN: 26.93 / MAX: 99.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
OSPray Intel OSPray is a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidenlity scientific visualizations. OSPray builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis Xeon E5-2609 v4 1.044 2.088 3.132 4.176 5.22 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 4.64 MIN: 4.37 / MAX: 4.67
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis Xeon E5-2609 v4 0.1913 0.3826 0.5739 0.7652 0.9565 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.85 MIN: 0.84 / MAX: 0.86
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer Xeon E5-2609 v4 0.1013 0.2026 0.3039 0.4052 0.5065 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.45 MAX: 0.46
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis Xeon E5-2609 v4 1.314 2.628 3.942 5.256 6.57 SE +/- 0.00, N = 8 5.84 MIN: 5.41 / MAX: 5.92
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer Xeon E5-2609 v4 0.1058 0.2116 0.3174 0.4232 0.529 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.47 MIN: 0.46
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis Xeon E5-2609 v4 1.1183 2.2366 3.3549 4.4732 5.5915 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 4.97 MIN: 4.85 / MAX: 5.03
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer Xeon E5-2609 v4 0.279 0.558 0.837 1.116 1.395 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.24 MIN: 1.21 / MAX: 1.25
OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer Xeon E5-2609 v4 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 62.5 MIN: 55.56 / MAX: 71.43
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass Xeon E5-2609 v4 0.207 0.414 0.621 0.828 1.035 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.92 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime Xeon E5-2609 v4 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 8.59 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass Xeon E5-2609 v4 0.3308 0.6616 0.9924 1.3232 1.654 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.47 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime Xeon E5-2609 v4 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 17.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Xeon E5-2609 v4 0.8324 1.6648 2.4972 3.3296 4.162 SE +/- 0.0141, N = 3 3.6996 MIN: 3.66 / MAX: 3.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Xeon E5-2609 v4 0.9175 1.835 2.7525 3.67 4.5875 SE +/- 0.0152, N = 3 4.0778 MIN: 4.03 / MAX: 4.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Xeon E5-2609 v4 0.8429 1.6858 2.5287 3.3716 4.2145 SE +/- 0.0041, N = 3 3.7461 MIN: 3.72 / MAX: 3.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Xeon E5-2609 v4 1.0978 2.1956 3.2934 4.3912 5.489 SE +/- 0.0170, N = 3 4.8790 MIN: 4.83 / MAX: 4.97
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Xeon E5-2609 v4 0.9828 1.9656 2.9484 3.9312 4.914 SE +/- 0.0371, N = 12 4.3681 MIN: 3.82 / MAX: 4.46
SVT-AV1 This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-AV1 CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the AV1 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Xeon E5-2609 v4 0.009 0.018 0.027 0.036 0.045 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.04 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Xeon E5-2609 v4 0.2336 0.4672 0.7008 0.9344 1.168 SE +/- 0.002, N = 3 1.038 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Xeon E5-2609 v4 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.006, N = 3 7.551 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
SVT-VP9 This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-VP9 CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the VP9 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Xeon E5-2609 v4 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 63.86 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Xeon E5-2609 v4 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 65.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Xeon E5-2609 v4 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 52.45 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
x264 This is a simple test of the x264 encoder run on the CPU (OpenCL support disabled) with a sample video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Xeon E5-2609 v4 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 25.45 1. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lavformat -lavcodec -lavutil -lswscale -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -ffast-math -std=gnu99 -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-vectorize
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Xeon E5-2609 v4 0.045 0.09 0.135 0.18 0.225 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.2 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Xeon E5-2609 v4 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 13.05, N = 3 5699.48 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Xeon E5-2609 v4 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 10.3 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Xeon E5-2609 v4 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 86.19 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Xeon E5-2609 v4 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 10.3 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Xeon E5-2609 v4 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 86.32 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Xeon E5-2609 v4 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.039, N = 3 6.572 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Xeon E5-2609 v4 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.009, N = 3 7.919 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Xeon E5-2609 v4 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 82.54 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Xeon E5-2609 v4 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 10.6 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds Per Op, Fewer Is Better LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Xeon E5-2609 v4 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 83.30 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lsnappy -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 4 Xeon E5-2609 v4 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 0.85, N = 3 443 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -lpthread -llzma -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 8 Xeon E5-2609 v4 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.06, N = 3 421 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -lpthread -llzma -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 16 Xeon E5-2609 v4 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.75, N = 3 398 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -lpthread -llzma -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org Queries Per Second, More Is Better MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 32 Xeon E5-2609 v4 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.74, N = 3 359 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pie -fPIC -fstack-protector -O2 -lpthread -llzma -lsnappy -lnuma -lcrypt -lz -lm -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
Basis Universal Basis Universal is a GPU texture codoec. This test times how long it takes to convert sRGB PNGs into Basis Univeral assets with various settings. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: ETC1S Xeon E5-2609 v4 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 138.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 0 Xeon E5-2609 v4 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 21.32 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 Xeon E5-2609 v4 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 99.11 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 3 Xeon E5-2609 v4 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 190.49 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing Xeon E5-2609 v4 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 1909.71 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better G'MIC Test: Plotting Isosurface Of A 3D Volume, 1000 Times Xeon E5-2609 v4 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 49.71 1. Version 2.4.5, Copyright (c) 2008-2019, David Tschumperle.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better G'MIC Test: 3D Elevated Function In Random Colors, 100 Times Xeon E5-2609 v4 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 158.23 1. Version 2.4.5, Copyright (c) 2008-2019, David Tschumperle.
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: NUMA Xeon E5-2609 v4 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 78.99 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MEMFD Xeon E5-2609 v4 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 206.27 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Atomic Xeon E5-2609 v4 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 239.80, N = 3 108834.90 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Crypto Xeon E5-2609 v4 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 730.09 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Malloc Xeon E5-2609 v4 6M 12M 18M 24M 30M SE +/- 29859.86, N = 3 29841532.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: RdRand Xeon E5-2609 v4 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 3.51, N = 3 243874.91 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Forking Xeon E5-2609 v4 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 35.91, N = 3 20218.13 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: SENDFILE Xeon E5-2609 v4 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 46.12, N = 3 38677.34 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Cache Xeon E5-2609 v4 1.1993 2.3986 3.5979 4.7972 5.9965 SE +/- 0.13, N = 15 5.33 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Stress Xeon E5-2609 v4 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 1263.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Semaphores Xeon E5-2609 v4 130K 260K 390K 520K 650K SE +/- 166.92, N = 3 584138.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Matrix Math Xeon E5-2609 v4 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 3.05, N = 3 15985.74 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Vector Math Xeon E5-2609 v4 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 208.86, N = 3 17223.25 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Memory Copying Xeon E5-2609 v4 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 12.33, N = 3 4728.86 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Socket Activity Xeon E5-2609 v4 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 12.58, N = 3 2763.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Context Switching Xeon E5-2609 v4 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 13937.24, N = 3 955179.26 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc C String Functions Xeon E5-2609 v4 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 2331.36, N = 5 192123.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Xeon E5-2609 v4 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 47.55 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: System V Message Passing Xeon E5-2609 v4 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 34383.72, N = 15 2794986.70 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -lpthread -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Read Xeon E5-2609 v4 4M 8M 12M 16M 20M SE +/- 4284.43, N = 3 18546724 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -rdynamic -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Sequential Fill Xeon E5-2609 v4 110K 220K 330K 440K 550K SE +/- 3193.77, N = 3 506802 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -rdynamic -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Fill Sync Xeon E5-2609 v4 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.60, N = 3 1046 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -rdynamic -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Op/s, More Is Better Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Read While Writing Xeon E5-2609 v4 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 7620.23, N = 3 750946 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fno-builtin-memcmp -fno-rtti -rdynamic -lpthread
Git This test measures the time needed to carry out some sample Git operations on an example, static repository that happens to be a copy of the GNOME GTK tool-kit repository. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Xeon E5-2609 v4 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 123.66 1. git version 2.25.1
User Comments