This is a benchmark of the Apache Cassandra NoSQL database management system making use of cassandra-stress.
To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark cassandra.
OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 950 public results since 8 October 2019 with the latest data as of 2 March 2021.
Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.
Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 - Test: Writes) has an average run-time of 11 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 3 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.
Based on public OpenBenchmarking.org results, the selected test / test configuration has an average standard deviation of 3.4%.
Yes, based on the automated analysis of the collected public benchmark data, this test / test settings does generally scale well with increasing CPU core counts. Data based on publicly available results for this test / test settings, separated by vendor, result divided by the reference CPU clock speed, grouped by matching physical CPU core count, and normalized against the smallest core count tested from each vendor for each CPU having a sufficient number of test samples and statistically significant data.
1 System - 118 Benchmark Results |
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 - Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S - Intel Xeon E5 CentOS 7.9.2009 - 3.10.0-1160.11.1.el7.x86_64 - X Server |
1 System - 117 Benchmark Results |
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 - Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S - Intel Xeon E5 CentOS 7.4.1708 - 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 - X Server |
1 System - 91 Benchmark Results |
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 - Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S - Intel Xeon E5 CentOS 7.4.1708 - 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 - X Server |
1 System - 118 Benchmark Results |
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 - Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S - Intel Xeon E5 CentOS 7.9.2009 - 3.10.0-1160.11.1.el7.x86_64 - X Server |
1 System - 140 Benchmark Results |
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - Cisco UCSB-B200-M4 - Intel Xeon E7 v3 OracleServer 8.3 - 5.4.17-2011.7.4.el8uek.x86_64 - matrox |
1 System - 117 Benchmark Results |
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 - Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S - Intel Xeon E5 CentOS 7.9.2009 - 3.10.0-1160.11.1.el7.x86_64 - X Server |
1 System - 91 Benchmark Results |
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 - Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S - Intel Xeon E5 CentOS 7.4.1708 - 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 - X Server |
1 System - 117 Benchmark Results |
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 - Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S - Intel Xeon E5 CentOS 7.4.1708 - 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 - X Server |
1 System - 94 Benchmark Results |
2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6240 - Intel 440BX - Intel 440BX Amazon Linux 2 - 4.14.214-160.339.amzn2.x86_64 - vmware |
1 System - 117 Benchmark Results |
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - Cisco UCSB-B200-M4 - Intel Xeon E7 v3 OracleServer 7.4 - 4.1.12-103.7.3.el7uek.x86_64 - matrox |
1 System - 140 Benchmark Results |
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - Cisco UCSB-B200-M4 - Intel Xeon E7 v3 OracleServer 8.3 - 5.4.17-2011.7.4.el8uek.x86_64 - matrox |
1 System - 117 Benchmark Results |
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 - Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S - Intel Xeon E5 CentOS 7.9.2009 - 3.10.0-1160.11.1.el7.x86_64 - X Server |