Threadripper 3970X Windows 10

Benchmarks by Michael Larabel.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1911268-HU-THREADRIP38
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Audio Encoding 2 Tests
AV1 2 Tests
Web Browsers 1 Tests
Chess Test Suite 7 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 12 Tests
Compression Tests 3 Tests
CPU Massive 28 Tests
Creator Workloads 17 Tests
Encoding 7 Tests
Game Development 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 2 Tests
Imaging 2 Tests
Java 2 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 2 Tests
Multi-Core 19 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 5 Tests
Intel oneAPI 2 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 3 Tests
Python Tests 2 Tests
Renderers 4 Tests
Server CPU Tests 19 Tests
Single-Threaded 9 Tests
Video Encoding 5 Tests
Common Workstation Benchmarks 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Windows 10
November 25 2019
  11 Hours, 40 Minutes
Windows 10 - Performance
November 26 2019
  10 Hours, 51 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  11 Hours, 15 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Windows 10

Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.1-ojdkbuild+13-LTS)
Python Notes: Python 3.7.1
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization: Disabled + Retpoline: Full + IBPB: Always + STIBP: Enabled

Windows 10 - Performance

Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 3.69GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (0601 BIOS), Memory: 4 x 16384 MB 3600MHz CMT64GX4M4Z3600C16, Disk: 932GB Force MP600, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 580 4GB, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 160MHz + Intel I211 Gigabit Connection

OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 18363, Kernel: 10.0 (x86_64), Display Driver: 26.20.12028.2, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2841.19), Compiler: GCC 7.1.0, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Threadripper 3970X Windows 10OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteAMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 3.69GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads)ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (0601 BIOS)4 x 16384 MB 3600MHz CMT64GX4M4Z3600C16932GB Force MP600AMD Radeon RX 580 4GBIntel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 160MHz + Intel I211 Gigabit ConnectionMicrosoft Windows 10 Pro Build 1836310.0 (x86_64)26.20.12028.2OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2841.19)GCC 7.1.0NTFS3840x2160ProcessorMotherboardMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkOSKernelDisplay DriverOpenCLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionThreadripper 3970X Windows 10 BenchmarksSystem Logs- OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.1-ojdkbuild+13-LTS)- Python 3.7.1- __user pointer sanitization: Disabled + Retpoline: Full + IBPB: Always + STIBP: Enabled

Windows 10 vs. Windows 10 - Performance ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+2%+2%+4%+4%+6%+6%+8%+8%6.8%6.8%2.8%2.8%2.1%2%S.C.c.j8%Launch Programs7.6%T.T.C.C.G.CSavina Reactors.IOCreate Files6%Disney Material3%13%Apache Spark ALS2.8%Wavelet Contour - 3840 x 2160Wavelet Contour - 3840 x 2160Apache Spark Bayes2.4%T.F.A.T.TEnc Mode 8 - 1080pSPECjbb 2015OSBenchGitRenaissanceOSBenchAppleseedt-test1RenaissanceParaViewParaViewRenaissancePyBenchSVT-AV1Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance

Threadripper 3970X Windows 10paraview: Many Spheres - 3840 x 2160paraview: Many Spheres - 3840 x 2160paraview: Wavelet Volume - 3840 x 2160paraview: Wavelet Volume - 3840 x 2160paraview: Wavelet Contour - 3840 x 2160paraview: Wavelet Contour - 3840 x 2160t-test1: 1t-test1: 2lczero: BLASlczero: Randmrbayes: Primate Phylogeny Analysisgo-benchmark: httpgo-benchmark: jsongo-benchmark: buildgo-benchmark: garbagedacapobench: H2dacapobench: Jythondacapobench: Tradesoapdacapobench: Tradebeansrenaissance: Apache Spark ALSrenaissance: Apache Spark Bayesrenaissance: Savina Reactors.IOrenaissance: Apache Spark PageRankrenaissance: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Treecrafty: Elapsed Timetscp: AI Chess Performancegraphics-magick: Swirlgraphics-magick: Rotategraphics-magick: Sharpengraphics-magick: Enhancedgraphics-magick: Resizinggraphics-magick: Noise-Gaussiangraphics-magick: HWB Color Spaceembree: Pathtracer - Crownembree: Pathtracer ISPC - Crownembree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragonembree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragon Objembree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragonembree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon Objrav1e: 1080p To AV1 Video Encodesvt-av1: Enc Mode 0 - 1080psvt-av1: Enc Mode 4 - 1080psvt-av1: Enc Mode 8 - 1080psvt-hevc: 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encodesvt-vp9: VMAF Optimized - Bosphorus 1080psvt-vp9: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Bosphorus 1080psvt-vp9: Visual Quality Optimized - Bosphorus 1080px264: H.264 Video Encodingoidn: Memorialluxcorerender: DLSCluxcorerender: Rainbow Colors and Prismcompress-7zip: Compress Speed Teststockfish: Total Timeasmfish: 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depthcompress-xz: Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9compress-zstd: Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19encode-flac: WAV To FLACencode-mp3: WAV To MP3m-queens: Time To Solveminion: Gracefulminion: Solitaireminion: Quasigroupn-queens: Elapsed Timeperl-benchmark: Pod2htmlperl-benchmark: Interpretertjbench: Decompression Throughputoptcarrot: Optimized Benchmarkv-ray: CPUblender: BMW27 - CPU-Onlyblender: Classroom - CPU-Onlyblender: Fishy Cat - CPU-Onlyblender: Barbershop - CPU-Onlyblender: Pabellon Barcelona - CPU-Onlypybench: Total For Average Test Timesneatbench: CPUappleseed: Emilyappleseed: Disney Materialappleseed: Material Testergeekbench: CPU Multi Coregeekbench: CPU Single Corenovabench: CPUnovabench: RAMnovabench: RAMselenium: ARES-6 - Firefoxselenium: Octane - Firefoxselenium: Jetstream - Firefoxselenium: CanvasMark - Firefoxselenium: StyleBench - Firefoxselenium: Maze Solver - Firefoxselenium: Speedometer - Firefoxselenium: ARES-6 - Google Chromeselenium: Octane - Google Chromeselenium: PSPDFKit WASM - Firefoxselenium: Jetstream - Google Chromeselenium: CanvasMark - Google Chromeselenium: StyleBench - Google Chromeselenium: Maze Solver - Google Chromeselenium: Speedometer - Google Chromeselenium: PSPDFKit WASM - Google Chromegit: Time To Complete Common Git Commandstesseract-ocr: Time To OCR 7 Imagesspec-jbb2015: SPECjbb2015-Composite max-jOPSspec-jbb2015: SPECjbb2015-Composite critical-jOPSosbench: Create Filesosbench: Create Threadsosbench: Launch Programsosbench: Memory AllocationsWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance32.573265.699123.41974.468118.171231.45822.325124.03334.519229302.4382.1126299160211727006714007478529304345165754295544648.3274072.77913188.90117516.61812525.6538778075128524367137018647569931247036.522736.712339.694835.621541.390435.82281.3170.0739.86397.187178.97415.71415.71339.36246.9824.572.962.85194543954840239155402219.3259.1427.7978.77118.40746.69546.567107.2553.5430.177262670.00948114216.322558133.484430250.43137.0378.72221.50166.00142939.8151.78967.56173.5362709413139624134372749.5641808250.081153474.731410919.50524141150234.901585534.993.712613719.95957.7058684343054776.81305029.854966.52792.710432.583266.866123.581977.281121.421265.40022.984123.69235.094828931.2381.7946242160873527254208133476916310245075691290345912.1314169.19212348.86317716.94612565.6398755971128457966336718746969531247336.546236.747839.988035.777241.414535.88471.3220.0749.80199.164178.97417.65417.45343.55250.2424.652.952.83195176956417929187888219.3399.1007.8148.76318.34246.65546.592106.9953.5400.175414540.00946931216.352894133.724389349.92135.2978.53221.96163.51140039.8149.71569.56973.0072725113169684144405248.9841700249.801158574.271411119.44524321154234.041582235.103.7125.113819.32458.1208582139877823.65455729.6701040.20392.9893OpenBenchmarking.org

ParaView

This test runs ParaView benchmarks: an open-source data analytics and visualization application. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance816243240SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 332.5732.58
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance714212835Min: 32.33 / Avg: 32.57 / Max: 32.92Min: 32.33 / Avg: 32.58 / Max: 32.84

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance7001400210028003500SE +/- 17.70, N = 3SE +/- 14.84, N = 33265.703266.87
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance6001200180024003000Min: 3241.24 / Avg: 3265.7 / Max: 3300.1Min: 3241.24 / Avg: 3266.87 / Max: 3292.63

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance306090120150SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3123.40123.58
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance20406080100Min: 123.4 / Avg: 123.4 / Max: 123.4Min: 123.4 / Avg: 123.58 / Max: 123.93

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance400800120016002000SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 2.81, N = 31974.471977.28
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance30060090012001500Min: 1974.47 / Avg: 1974.47 / Max: 1974.47Min: 1974.47 / Avg: 1977.28 / Max: 1982.91

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance306090120150SE +/- 1.10, N = 10SE +/- 1.59, N = 5118.17121.42
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance20406080100Min: 115.54 / Avg: 118.17 / Max: 123.4Min: 115.08 / Avg: 121.42 / Max: 123.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance30060090012001500SE +/- 11.47, N = 10SE +/- 16.57, N = 51231.461265.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance2004006008001000Min: 1204.04 / Avg: 1231.46 / Max: 1286.02Min: 1199.27 / Avg: 1265.4 / Max: 1286.02

t-test1

This is a test of t-test1 for basic memory allocator benchmarks. Note this test profile is currently very basic and the overall time does include the warmup time of the custom t-test1 compilation. Improvements welcome. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Bettert-test1 2017-01-13Threads: 1Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance612182430SE +/- 0.22, N = 15SE +/- 0.19, N = 322.3322.98
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Bettert-test1 2017-01-13Threads: 1Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance510152025Min: 20.64 / Avg: 22.33 / Max: 23.42Min: 22.78 / Avg: 22.98 / Max: 23.36

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Bettert-test1 2017-01-13Threads: 2Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance306090120150SE +/- 7.17, N = 12SE +/- 7.33, N = 12124.03123.69
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Bettert-test1 2017-01-13Threads: 2Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance20406080100Min: 100.69 / Avg: 124.03 / Max: 168.39Min: 103.28 / Avg: 123.69 / Max: 168.08

LeelaChessZero

LeelaChessZero (lc0 / lczero) is a chess engine automated vian neural networks. This test profile can be used for OpenCL, CUDA + cuDNN, and BLAS (CPU-based) benchmarking. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterLeelaChessZero 0.22.0Backend: BLASWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance816243240SE +/- 1.26, N = 15SE +/- 1.46, N = 1434.5235.09
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterLeelaChessZero 0.22.0Backend: BLASWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance714212835Min: 27.44 / Avg: 34.52 / Max: 44.53Min: 26.59 / Avg: 35.09 / Max: 49.29

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterLeelaChessZero 0.22.0Backend: RandomWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 391.03, N = 5SE +/- 177.30, N = 329302.428931.2
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterLeelaChessZero 0.22.0Backend: RandomWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance5K10K15K20K25KMin: 28246.3 / Avg: 29302.38 / Max: 30658.7Min: 28722.8 / Avg: 28931.23 / Max: 29283.9

Timed MrBayes Analysis

This test performs a bayesian analysis of a set of primate genome sequences in order to estimate their phylogeny. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7Primate Phylogeny AnalysisWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance80160240320400SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3382.11381.79
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7Primate Phylogeny AnalysisWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance70140210280350Min: 381.91 / Avg: 382.11 / Max: 382.45Min: 381.53 / Avg: 381.79 / Max: 382.12

Go Benchmarks

Benchmark for monitoring real time performance of the Go implementation for HTTP, JSON and garbage testing per iteration. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: httpWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance14002800420056007000SE +/- 41.45, N = 3SE +/- 59.25, N = 362996242
OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: httpWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance11002200330044005500Min: 6236 / Avg: 6298.67 / Max: 6377Min: 6125 / Avg: 6241.67 / Max: 6318

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: jsonWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 5309.60, N = 3SE +/- 1679.89, N = 316021171608735
OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: jsonWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance300K600K900K1200K1500KMin: 1596652 / Avg: 1602117.33 / Max: 1612735Min: 1606244 / Avg: 1608735 / Max: 1611933

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: buildWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance6000M12000M18000M24000M30000MSE +/- 609663734.09, N = 15SE +/- 638245414.71, N = 152700671400727254208133
OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: buildWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance5000M10000M15000M20000M25000MMin: 26205968000 / Avg: 27006714006.67 / Max: 35516501300Min: 26260775900 / Avg: 27254208133.33 / Max: 36133958000

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: garbageWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance100K200K300K400K500KSE +/- 577.36, N = 3SE +/- 831.48, N = 3478529476916
OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: garbageWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance80K160K240K320K400KMin: 477562 / Avg: 478528.67 / Max: 479559Min: 475428 / Avg: 476916 / Max: 478303

DaCapo Benchmark

This test runs the DaCapo Benchmarks written in Java and intended to test system/CPU performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: H2Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance7001400210028003500SE +/- 43.31, N = 4SE +/- 41.15, N = 1730433102
OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: H2Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance5001000150020002500Min: 2934 / Avg: 3043 / Max: 3129Min: 2859 / Avg: 3101.82 / Max: 3407

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: JythonWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance10002000300040005000SE +/- 44.20, N = 9SE +/- 36.08, N = 1945164507
OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: JythonWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance8001600240032004000Min: 4438 / Avg: 4515.56 / Max: 4863Min: 4410 / Avg: 4507.37 / Max: 5086

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: TradesoapWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance12002400360048006000SE +/- 63.07, N = 4SE +/- 40.42, N = 457545691
OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: TradesoapWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance10002000300040005000Min: 5577 / Avg: 5754 / Max: 5876Min: 5612 / Avg: 5690.75 / Max: 5771

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: TradebeansWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance6001200180024003000SE +/- 34.18, N = 4SE +/- 39.07, N = 429552903
OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: TradebeansWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance5001000150020002500Min: 2887 / Avg: 2954.5 / Max: 3039Min: 2820 / Avg: 2903 / Max: 3008

Renaissance

Renaissance is a suite of benchmarks designed to test the Java JVM from Apache Spark to a Twitter-like service to Scala and other features. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.9.0Test: Apache Spark ALSWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance10K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 781.76, N = 40SE +/- 1054.14, N = 4044648.3345912.13
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.9.0Test: Apache Spark ALSWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance8K16K24K32K40KMin: 38036.49 / Avg: 44648.33 / Max: 57824.23Min: 37333.04 / Avg: 45912.13 / Max: 66305.46

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.9.0Test: Apache Spark BayesWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance9001800270036004500SE +/- 18.77, N = 8SE +/- 41.08, N = 84072.784169.19
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.9.0Test: Apache Spark BayesWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance7001400210028003500Min: 4009.39 / Avg: 4072.78 / Max: 4184.64Min: 4002.5 / Avg: 4169.19 / Max: 4342.32

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.9.0Test: Savina Reactors.IOWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 337.09, N = 32SE +/- 115.39, N = 4013188.9012348.86
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.9.0Test: Savina Reactors.IOWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance2K4K6K8K10KMin: 11346.11 / Avg: 13188.9 / Max: 22016.75Min: 11041.81 / Avg: 12348.86 / Max: 14119.68

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.9.0Test: Apache Spark PageRankWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 94.48, N = 8SE +/- 138.64, N = 817516.6217716.95
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.9.0Test: Apache Spark PageRankWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance3K6K9K12K15KMin: 17089.95 / Avg: 17516.62 / Max: 17819.33Min: 17175.95 / Avg: 17716.95 / Max: 18562.38

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.9.0Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed TreeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 123.02, N = 9SE +/- 90.72, N = 1712525.6512565.64
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterRenaissance 0.9.0Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed TreeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance2K4K6K8K10KMin: 11923.58 / Avg: 12525.65 / Max: 13118.4Min: 11591.23 / Avg: 12565.64 / Max: 13102.61

Crafty

This is a performance test of Crafty, an advanced open-source chess engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterCrafty 25.2Elapsed TimeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance2M4M6M8M10MSE +/- 5108.39, N = 3SE +/- 1265.09, N = 387780758755971
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterCrafty 25.2Elapsed TimeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance1.5M3M4.5M6M7.5MMin: 8771252 / Avg: 8778074.67 / Max: 8788072Min: 8754201 / Avg: 8755971.33 / Max: 8758422

TSCP

This is a performance test of TSCP, Tom Kerrigan's Simple Chess Program, which has a built-in performance benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterTSCP 1.81AI Chess PerformanceWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 7587.44, N = 5SE +/- 6091.94, N = 512852431284579
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterTSCP 1.81AI Chess PerformanceWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance200K400K600K800K1000KMin: 1260361 / Avg: 1285242.6 / Max: 1305161Min: 1266156 / Avg: 1284579 / Max: 1302075

GraphicsMagick

This is a test of GraphicsMagick with its OpenMP implementation that performs various imaging tests on a sample 6000x4000 pixel JPEG image. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.33Operation: SwirlWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance140280420560700SE +/- 2.96, N = 3671663
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.33Operation: SwirlWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance120240360480600Min: 667 / Avg: 671.33 / Max: 677

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.33Operation: RotateWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance80160240320400SE +/- 0.88, N = 3SE +/- 0.88, N = 3370367
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.33Operation: RotateWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance70140210280350Min: 368 / Avg: 369.67 / Max: 371Min: 365 / Avg: 366.67 / Max: 368

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.33Operation: SharpenWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance4080120160200SE +/- 0.33, N = 3186187
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.33Operation: SharpenWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance306090120150Min: 186 / Avg: 186.67 / Max: 187

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.33Operation: EnhancedWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance100200300400500SE +/- 2.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.88, N = 3475469
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.33Operation: EnhancedWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance80160240320400Min: 471 / Avg: 475 / Max: 478Min: 467 / Avg: 468.67 / Max: 470

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.33Operation: ResizingWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance150300450600750SE +/- 3.06, N = 3SE +/- 2.19, N = 3699695
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.33Operation: ResizingWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance120240360480600Min: 693 / Avg: 699 / Max: 703Min: 691 / Avg: 695.33 / Max: 698

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.33Operation: Noise-GaussianWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance70140210280350SE +/- 1.00, N = 3312312
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.33Operation: Noise-GaussianWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance60120180240300Min: 311 / Avg: 312 / Max: 314

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.33Operation: HWB Color SpaceWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance100200300400500SE +/- 0.88, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3470473
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.33Operation: HWB Color SpaceWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance80160240320400Min: 469 / Avg: 470.33 / Max: 472Min: 472 / Avg: 472.67 / Max: 473

Embree

Intel Embree is a collection of high-performance ray-tracing kernels for execution on CPUs. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.6.1Binary: Pathtracer - Model: CrownWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance816243240SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 336.5236.55MIN: 36.06 / MAX: 37.58MIN: 36.12 / MAX: 37.46
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.6.1Binary: Pathtracer - Model: CrownWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance816243240Min: 36.43 / Avg: 36.52 / Max: 36.64Min: 36.48 / Avg: 36.55 / Max: 36.64

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.6.1Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: CrownWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance816243240SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 336.7136.75MIN: 36.25 / MAX: 37.95MIN: 36.3 / MAX: 37.69
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.6.1Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: CrownWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance816243240Min: 36.63 / Avg: 36.71 / Max: 36.82Min: 36.7 / Avg: 36.75 / Max: 36.82

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.6.1Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian DragonWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance918273645SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 339.6939.99MIN: 39.42 / MAX: 40.42MIN: 39.7 / MAX: 40.7
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.6.1Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian DragonWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance816243240Min: 39.65 / Avg: 39.69 / Max: 39.72Min: 39.96 / Avg: 39.99 / Max: 40.04

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.6.1Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon ObjWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance816243240SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 335.6235.78MIN: 35.25 / MAX: 36.34MIN: 35.51 / MAX: 36.52
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.6.1Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon ObjWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance816243240Min: 35.52 / Avg: 35.62 / Max: 35.67Min: 35.76 / Avg: 35.78 / Max: 35.79

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.6.1Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian DragonWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance918273645SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 341.3941.41MIN: 41.08 / MAX: 42.15MIN: 41.13 / MAX: 42.02
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.6.1Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian DragonWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance918273645Min: 41.34 / Avg: 41.39 / Max: 41.46Min: 41.36 / Avg: 41.41 / Max: 41.49

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.6.1Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon ObjWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance816243240SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 335.8235.88MIN: 35.54 / MAX: 36.51MIN: 35.55 / MAX: 36.73
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.6.1Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon ObjWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance816243240Min: 35.79 / Avg: 35.82 / Max: 35.85Min: 35.81 / Avg: 35.88 / Max: 35.93

rav1e

Xiph rav1e is a Rust-written AV1 video encoder. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterrav1e 0.11080p To AV1 Video EncodeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance0.29750.5950.89251.191.4875SE +/- 0.002, N = 3SE +/- 0.002, N = 31.3171.322
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterrav1e 0.11080p To AV1 Video EncodeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance246810Min: 1.31 / Avg: 1.32 / Max: 1.32Min: 1.32 / Avg: 1.32 / Max: 1.33

SVT-AV1

This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-AV1 CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the AV1 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.7Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080pWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance0.01670.03340.05010.06680.0835SE +/- 0.000, N = 9SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.0730.074
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.7Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080pWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance12345Min: 0.07 / Avg: 0.07 / Max: 0.07Min: 0.07 / Avg: 0.07 / Max: 0.07

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.7Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080pWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance3691215SE +/- 0.032, N = 3SE +/- 0.044, N = 39.8639.801
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.7Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080pWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance3691215Min: 9.82 / Avg: 9.86 / Max: 9.93Min: 9.73 / Avg: 9.8 / Max: 9.88

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.7Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080pWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance20406080100SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.73, N = 397.1999.16
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.7Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080pWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance20406080100Min: 96.79 / Avg: 97.19 / Max: 97.5Min: 98.01 / Avg: 99.16 / Max: 100.5

SVT-HEVC

This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-HEVC CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the HEVC / H.265 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.4.11080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video EncodeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance4080120160200SE +/- 0.52, N = 3SE +/- 0.65, N = 3178.97178.97
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.4.11080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video EncodeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance306090120150Min: 177.94 / Avg: 178.97 / Max: 179.59Min: 177.67 / Avg: 178.97 / Max: 179.75

SVT-VP9

This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-VP9 CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the VP9 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.1Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080pWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance90180270360450SE +/- 3.44, N = 13SE +/- 2.97, N = 14415.71417.65
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.1Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080pWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance70140210280350Min: 375 / Avg: 415.71 / Max: 422.83Min: 379.75 / Avg: 417.65 / Max: 425.23

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.1Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080pWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance90180270360450SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.96, N = 3415.71417.45
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.1Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080pWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance70140210280350Min: 414.08 / Avg: 415.71 / Max: 417.54Min: 416.09 / Avg: 417.45 / Max: 419.29

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.1Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080pWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance70140210280350SE +/- 3.10, N = 3SE +/- 2.55, N = 3339.36343.55
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.1Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080pWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance60120180240300Min: 333.89 / Avg: 339.36 / Max: 344.63Min: 340.72 / Avg: 343.55 / Max: 348.63

x264

This is a simple test of the x264 encoder run on the CPU (OpenCL support disabled) with a sample video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2018-09-25H.264 Video EncodingWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance50100150200250SE +/- 2.05, N = 3SE +/- 2.17, N = 3246.98250.24
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2018-09-25H.264 Video EncodingWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance50100150200250Min: 242.91 / Avg: 246.98 / Max: 249.48Min: 246 / Avg: 250.24 / Max: 253.16

Intel Open Image Denoise

Open Image Denoise is a denoising library for ray-tracing and part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages / Sec, More Is BetterIntel Open Image Denoise 1.0.0Scene: MemorialWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance612182430SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 324.5724.65
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages / Sec, More Is BetterIntel Open Image Denoise 1.0.0Scene: MemorialWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance612182430Min: 24.52 / Avg: 24.57 / Max: 24.64Min: 24.62 / Avg: 24.65 / Max: 24.71

LuxCoreRender

LuxCoreRender is an open-source physically based renderer. This test profile is focused on running LuxCoreRender on the CPU as opposed to the OpenCL version. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender 2.2Scene: DLSCWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance0.6661.3321.9982.6643.33SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 32.962.95MIN: 2.92 / MAX: 3.03MIN: 2.9 / MAX: 3.02
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender 2.2Scene: DLSCWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance246810Min: 2.94 / Avg: 2.96 / Max: 3Min: 2.92 / Avg: 2.95 / Max: 2.98

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender 2.2Scene: Rainbow Colors and PrismWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance0.64131.28261.92392.56523.2065SE +/- 0.07, N = 12SE +/- 0.06, N = 152.852.83MIN: 2.58 / MAX: 3.21MIN: 2.55 / MAX: 3.22
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender 2.2Scene: Rainbow Colors and PrismWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance246810Min: 2.63 / Avg: 2.85 / Max: 3.21Min: 2.6 / Avg: 2.83 / Max: 3.22

7-Zip Compression

This is a test of 7-Zip using p7zip with its integrated benchmark feature or upstream 7-Zip for the Windows x64 build. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 16.02Compress Speed TestWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 223.48, N = 3SE +/- 371.74, N = 3194543195176
OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 16.02Compress Speed TestWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance30K60K90K120K150KMin: 194112 / Avg: 194543 / Max: 194861Min: 194438 / Avg: 195176 / Max: 195623

Stockfish

This is a test of Stockfish, an advanced C++11 chess benchmark that can scale up to 128 CPU cores. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterStockfish 9Total TimeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance20M40M60M80M100MSE +/- 798735.56, N = 3SE +/- 169870.69, N = 39548402395641792
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterStockfish 9Total TimeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance17M34M51M68M85MMin: 94249652 / Avg: 95484023 / Max: 96979378Min: 95471190 / Avg: 95641791.67 / Max: 95981532

asmFish

This is a test of asmFish, an advanced chess benchmark written in Assembly. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes/second, More Is BetterasmFish 2018-07-231024 Hash Memory, 26 DepthWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance20M40M60M80M100MSE +/- 605786.92, N = 3SE +/- 699084.01, N = 39155402291878882
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes/second, More Is BetterasmFish 2018-07-231024 Hash Memory, 26 DepthWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance16M32M48M64M80MMin: 90849677 / Avg: 91554022.33 / Max: 92759926Min: 91121046 / Avg: 91878881.67 / Max: 93275355

XZ Compression

This test measures the time needed to compress a sample file (an Ubuntu file-system image) using XZ compression. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterXZ Compression 5.2.4Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance510152025SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 319.3319.34
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterXZ Compression 5.2.4Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance510152025Min: 19.24 / Avg: 19.33 / Max: 19.47Min: 19.23 / Avg: 19.34 / Max: 19.44

Zstd Compression

This test measures the time needed to compress a sample file (an Ubuntu file-system image) using Zstd compression. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterZstd Compression 1.3.4Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance3691215SE +/- 0.107, N = 3SE +/- 0.116, N = 39.1429.100
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterZstd Compression 1.3.4Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance3691215Min: 8.99 / Avg: 9.14 / Max: 9.35Min: 8.92 / Avg: 9.1 / Max: 9.32

FLAC Audio Encoding

This test times how long it takes to encode a sample WAV file to FLAC format five times. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterFLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2WAV To FLACWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance246810SE +/- 0.014, N = 5SE +/- 0.026, N = 57.7977.814
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterFLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2WAV To FLACWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance3691215Min: 7.76 / Avg: 7.8 / Max: 7.84Min: 7.76 / Avg: 7.81 / Max: 7.91

LAME MP3 Encoding

LAME is an MP3 encoder licensed under the LGPL. This test measures the time required to encode a WAV file to MP3 format. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterLAME MP3 Encoding 3.100WAV To MP3Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance246810SE +/- 0.020, N = 3SE +/- 0.022, N = 38.7718.763
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterLAME MP3 Encoding 3.100WAV To MP3Windows 10Windows 10 - Performance3691215Min: 8.74 / Avg: 8.77 / Max: 8.81Min: 8.73 / Avg: 8.76 / Max: 8.8

m-queens

A solver for the N-queens problem with multi-threading support via the OpenMP library. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterm-queens 1.2Time To SolveWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance510152025SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 318.4118.34
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterm-queens 1.2Time To SolveWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance510152025Min: 18.34 / Avg: 18.41 / Max: 18.47Min: 18.31 / Avg: 18.34 / Max: 18.37

Minion

Minion is an open-source constraint solver that is designed to be very scalable. This test profile uses Minion's integrated benchmarking problems to solve. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMinion 1.8Benchmark: GracefulWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance1122334455SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 346.7046.66
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMinion 1.8Benchmark: GracefulWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance1020304050Min: 46.56 / Avg: 46.7 / Max: 46.9Min: 46.53 / Avg: 46.66 / Max: 46.78

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMinion 1.8Benchmark: SolitaireWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance1122334455SE +/- 0.49, N = 3SE +/- 0.47, N = 346.5746.59
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMinion 1.8Benchmark: SolitaireWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance918273645Min: 46.01 / Avg: 46.57 / Max: 47.54Min: 45.99 / Avg: 46.59 / Max: 47.52

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMinion 1.8Benchmark: QuasigroupWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance20406080100SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 3107.26107.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMinion 1.8Benchmark: QuasigroupWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance20406080100Min: 107.13 / Avg: 107.25 / Max: 107.32Min: 106.66 / Avg: 107 / Max: 107.59

N-Queens

This is a test of the OpenMP version of a test that solves the N-queens problem. The board problem size is 18. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterN-Queens 1.0Elapsed TimeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance0.79721.59442.39163.18883.986SE +/- 0.003, N = 3SE +/- 0.004, N = 33.5433.540
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterN-Queens 1.0Elapsed TimeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance246810Min: 3.54 / Avg: 3.54 / Max: 3.55Min: 3.53 / Avg: 3.54 / Max: 3.55

Perl Benchmarks

Perl benchmark suite that can be used to compare the relative speed of different versions of perl. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: Pod2htmlWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance0.03990.07980.11970.15960.1995SE +/- 0.00006692, N = 12SE +/- 0.00014494, N = 30.177262670.17541454
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: Pod2htmlWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance12345Min: 0.18 / Avg: 0.18 / Max: 0.18Min: 0.18 / Avg: 0.18 / Max: 0.18

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: InterpreterWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance0.00210.00420.00630.00840.0105SE +/- 0.00002041, N = 12SE +/- 0.00002866, N = 150.009481140.00946931
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: InterpreterWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance12345Min: 0.01 / Avg: 0.01 / Max: 0.01Min: 0.01 / Avg: 0.01 / Max: 0.01

libjpeg-turbo tjbench

tjbench is a JPEG decompression/compression benchmark part of libjpeg-turbo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMegapixels/sec, More Is Betterlibjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2Test: Decompression ThroughputWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance50100150200250SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3216.32216.35
OpenBenchmarking.orgMegapixels/sec, More Is Betterlibjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2Test: Decompression ThroughputWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance4080120160200Min: 216.18 / Avg: 216.32 / Max: 216.41Min: 216 / Avg: 216.35 / Max: 216.6

Optcarrot

Optcarrot is an NES emulator benchmark for the Ruby language. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOptcarrotOptimized BenchmarkWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance306090120150SE +/- 0.08, N = 4SE +/- 0.34, N = 4133.48133.721. ruby 2.6.4p104 (2019-08-28 revision 67798) [x86_64-cygwin]
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOptcarrotOptimized BenchmarkWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance306090120150Min: 133.3 / Avg: 133.48 / Max: 133.7Min: 132.72 / Avg: 133.72 / Max: 134.181. ruby 2.6.4p104 (2019-08-28 revision 67798) [x86_64-cygwin]

Chaos Group V-RAY

This is a test of Chaos Group's V-RAY benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgKsamples, More Is BetterChaos Group V-RAY 4.10.03Mode: CPUWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 292.53, N = 3SE +/- 174.61, N = 34430243893
OpenBenchmarking.orgKsamples, More Is BetterChaos Group V-RAY 4.10.03Mode: CPUWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance8K16K24K32K40KMin: 43762 / Avg: 44302 / Max: 44767Min: 43702 / Avg: 43893.33 / Max: 44242

Blender

Blender is an open-source 3D creation software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles benchmark with various sample files. GPU computing via OpenCL or CUDA is supported. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance1122334455SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 350.4349.92
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance1020304050Min: 50.22 / Avg: 50.43 / Max: 50.61Min: 49.87 / Avg: 49.92 / Max: 50.03

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance306090120150SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3137.03135.29
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance306090120150Min: 136.73 / Avg: 137.03 / Max: 137.22Min: 134.76 / Avg: 135.29 / Max: 135.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance20406080100SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 378.7278.53
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance1530456075Min: 78.49 / Avg: 78.72 / Max: 79.03Min: 78.15 / Avg: 78.53 / Max: 78.95

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance50100150200250SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3221.50221.96
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance4080120160200Min: 221.22 / Avg: 221.5 / Max: 221.95Min: 221.74 / Avg: 221.96 / Max: 222.17

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance4080120160200SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3166.00163.51
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance306090120150Min: 165.65 / Avg: 166 / Max: 166.3Min: 163.31 / Avg: 163.51 / Max: 163.85

PyBench

This test profile reports the total time of the different average timed test results from PyBench. PyBench reports average test times for different functions such as BuiltinFunctionCalls and NestedForLoops, with this total result providing a rough estimate as to Python's average performance on a given system. This test profile runs PyBench each time for 20 rounds. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2018-02-16Total For Average Test TimesWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance30060090012001500SE +/- 7.51, N = 3SE +/- 9.87, N = 314291400
OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2018-02-16Total For Average Test TimesWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance2004006008001000Min: 1414 / Avg: 1429 / Max: 1437Min: 1389 / Avg: 1400.33 / Max: 1420

NeatBench

NeatBench is a benchmark of the cross-platform Neat Video software on the CPU and optional GPU (OpenCL / CUDA) support. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterNeatBench 5Acceleration: CPUWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance918273645SE +/- 2.30, N = 16SE +/- 2.35, N = 1639.839.8
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterNeatBench 5Acceleration: CPUWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance816243240Min: 29 / Avg: 39.83 / Max: 49.3Min: 29 / Avg: 39.84 / Max: 49.4

Appleseed

Appleseed is an open-source production renderer focused on physically-based global illumination rendering engine primarily designed for animation and visual effects. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaScene: EmilyWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance306090120150151.79149.72

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaScene: Disney MaterialWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance153045607567.5669.57

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaScene: Material TesterWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance163248648073.5473.01

Geekbench

This is a benchmark of Geekbench 5 Pro. The test profile automates the execution of Geekbench 5 under the Phoronix Test Suite, assuming you have a valid license key for Geekbench 5 Pro. This test will not work without a valid license key for Geekbench Pro. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterGeekbench 5.0Test: CPU Multi CoreWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance6K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 72.45, N = 3SE +/- 85.98, N = 32709427251
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterGeekbench 5.0Test: CPU Multi CoreWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance5K10K15K20K25KMin: 26963 / Avg: 27094.33 / Max: 27213Min: 27082 / Avg: 27250.67 / Max: 27364

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterGeekbench 5.0Test: CPU Single CoreWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance30060090012001500SE +/- 2.33, N = 3SE +/- 2.40, N = 313131316
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterGeekbench 5.0Test: CPU Single CoreWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance2004006008001000Min: 1309 / Avg: 1312.67 / Max: 1317Min: 1311 / Avg: 1315.67 / Max: 1319

Novabench

This is a benchmark of Novabench. The test profile automates the execution of Novabench under the Phoronix Test Suite, assuming you have a valid license key for Novabench Pro or Novabench Commercial. This test will not work without a valid license key and activating Novabench. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgCPU Score, More Is BetterNovabenchTest: CPUWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance2004006008001000SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 1.00, N = 3962968
OpenBenchmarking.orgCPU Score, More Is BetterNovabenchTest: CPUWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance2004006008001000Min: 961 / Avg: 962 / Max: 963Min: 966 / Avg: 968 / Max: 969

OpenBenchmarking.orgRAM Score, More Is BetterNovabenchTest: RAMWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance90180270360450SE +/- 0.33, N = 3413414
OpenBenchmarking.orgRAM Score, More Is BetterNovabenchTest: RAMWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance70140210280350Min: 413 / Avg: 413.33 / Max: 414

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterNovabenchTest: RAMWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 49.33, N = 3SE +/- 115.22, N = 34372744052
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterNovabenchTest: RAMWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance8K16K24K32K40KMin: 43678 / Avg: 43727.33 / Max: 43826Min: 43901 / Avg: 44051.67 / Max: 44278

Selenium

This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance1122334455SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 349.5648.981. firefox 70.0.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance1020304050Min: 48.8 / Avg: 49.56 / Max: 50.02Min: 48.65 / Avg: 48.98 / Max: 49.421. firefox 70.0.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Octane - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 320.43, N = 3SE +/- 242.95, N = 341808417001. firefox 70.0.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Octane - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance7K14K21K28K35KMin: 41251 / Avg: 41807.67 / Max: 42361Min: 41396 / Avg: 41699.67 / Max: 421801. firefox 70.0.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance50100150200250SE +/- 1.79, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3250.08249.801. firefox 70.0.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance50100150200250Min: 246.59 / Avg: 250.08 / Max: 252.53Min: 249.76 / Avg: 249.8 / Max: 249.831. firefox 70.0.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 82.40, N = 3SE +/- 138.63, N = 511534115851. firefox 70.0.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance2K4K6K8K10KMin: 11396 / Avg: 11534 / Max: 11681Min: 11225 / Avg: 11584.6 / Max: 119791. firefox 70.0.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRuns / Minute, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: StyleBench - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance20406080100SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 374.7374.271. firefox 70.0.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgRuns / Minute, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: StyleBench - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance1428425670Min: 74.6 / Avg: 74.73 / Max: 74.8Min: 74.19 / Avg: 74.27 / Max: 74.41. firefox 70.0.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance4812162014141. firefox 70.0.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgRuns Per Minute, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Speedometer - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance20406080100SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 1.67, N = 31091111. firefox 70.0.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgRuns Per Minute, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Speedometer - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance20406080100Min: 108 / Avg: 109 / Max: 111Min: 108 / Avg: 111.33 / Max: 1131. firefox 70.0.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance510152025SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 319.5019.441. chrome 78.0.3904.108
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance510152025Min: 19.34 / Avg: 19.5 / Max: 19.68Min: 19.38 / Avg: 19.44 / Max: 19.521. chrome 78.0.3904.108

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Octane - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance11K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 147.72, N = 3SE +/- 104.46, N = 352414524321. chrome 78.0.3904.108
OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Octane - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance9K18K27K36K45KMin: 52119 / Avg: 52414.33 / Max: 52569Min: 52224 / Avg: 52432.33 / Max: 525501. chrome 78.0.3904.108

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance2004006008001000SE +/- 7.51, N = 3SE +/- 3.51, N = 3115011541. firefox 70.0.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: FirefoxWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance2004006008001000Min: 1137 / Avg: 1150.33 / Max: 1163Min: 1150 / Avg: 1154 / Max: 11611. firefox 70.0.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance50100150200250SE +/- 1.13, N = 3SE +/- 1.02, N = 3234.90234.041. chrome 78.0.3904.108
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance4080120160200Min: 233.7 / Avg: 234.9 / Max: 237.17Min: 232.05 / Avg: 234.04 / Max: 235.391. chrome 78.0.3904.108

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 149.45, N = 3SE +/- 115.67, N = 315855158221. chrome 78.0.3904.108
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance3K6K9K12K15KMin: 15557 / Avg: 15854.67 / Max: 16027Min: 15591 / Avg: 15822.33 / Max: 159401. chrome 78.0.3904.108

OpenBenchmarking.orgRuns / Minute, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance816243240SE +/- 0.39, N = 7SE +/- 0.10, N = 334.9935.101. chrome 78.0.3904.108
OpenBenchmarking.orgRuns / Minute, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance816243240Min: 32.7 / Avg: 34.99 / Max: 35.7Min: 35 / Avg: 35.1 / Max: 35.291. chrome 78.0.3904.108

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance0.83251.6652.49753.334.1625SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 33.73.71. chrome 78.0.3904.108
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance246810Min: 3.7 / Avg: 3.73 / Max: 3.8Min: 3.7 / Avg: 3.73 / Max: 3.81. chrome 78.0.3904.108

OpenBenchmarking.orgRuns Per Minute, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance306090120150SE +/- 0.54, N = 3126.0125.11. chrome 78.0.3904.108
OpenBenchmarking.orgRuns Per Minute, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance20406080100Min: 124 / Avg: 125.07 / Max: 125.71. chrome 78.0.3904.108

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance30060090012001500SE +/- 6.39, N = 3SE +/- 2.89, N = 3137113811. chrome 78.0.3904.108
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google ChromeWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance2004006008001000Min: 1359 / Avg: 1370.67 / Max: 1381Min: 1376 / Avg: 1381 / Max: 13861. chrome 78.0.3904.108

Git

This test measures the time needed to carry out some sample Git operations on an example, static repository that happens to be a copy of the GNOME GTK tool-kit repository. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGitTime To Complete Common Git CommandsWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance3691215SE +/- 0.218, N = 15SE +/- 0.139, N = 39.9599.3241. git version 2.24.0.windows.2
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGitTime To Complete Common Git CommandsWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance3691215Min: 8.95 / Avg: 9.96 / Max: 11.45Min: 9.17 / Avg: 9.32 / Max: 9.61. git version 2.24.0.windows.2

Tesseract OCR

Tesseract-OCR is the open-source optical character recognition (OCR) engine for the conversion of text within images to raw text output. This test profile relies upon a system-supplied Tesseract installation. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTesseract OCR v4.0.0.20181030Time To OCR 7 ImagesWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance1326395265SE +/- 0.47, N = 3SE +/- 0.27, N = 357.7158.12
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTesseract OCR v4.0.0.20181030Time To OCR 7 ImagesWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance1122334455Min: 56.9 / Avg: 57.7 / Max: 58.52Min: 57.65 / Avg: 58.12 / Max: 58.6

SPECjbb 2015

This is a benchmark of SPECjbb 2015. For this test profile to work, you must have a valid license/copy of the SPECjbb 2015 ISO (SPECjbb2015-1.02.iso) in your Phoronix Test Suite download cache. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgjOPS, More Is BetterSPECjbb 2015SPECjbb2015-Composite max-jOPSWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance20K40K60K80K100K8684385821

OpenBenchmarking.orgjOPS, More Is BetterSPECjbb 2015SPECjbb2015-Composite critical-jOPSWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance9K18K27K36K45K4305439877

OSBench

OSBench is a collection of micro-benchmarks for measuring operating system primitives like time to create threads/processes, launching programs, creating files, and memory allocation. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Create FilesWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance2004006008001000SE +/- 8.92, N = 3SE +/- 13.12, N = 3776.81823.65
OpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Create FilesWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance140280420560700Min: 767.1 / Avg: 776.81 / Max: 794.63Min: 797.66 / Avg: 823.65 / Max: 839.72

OpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Create ThreadsWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance714212835SE +/- 0.64, N = 15SE +/- 0.62, N = 1529.8529.67
OpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Create ThreadsWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance714212835Min: 26.57 / Avg: 29.85 / Max: 32.38Min: 26.82 / Avg: 29.67 / Max: 32.85

OpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Launch ProgramsWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance2004006008001000SE +/- 43.72, N = 15SE +/- 52.92, N = 15966.531040.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Launch ProgramsWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance2004006008001000Min: 889.02 / Avg: 966.53 / Max: 1397.38Min: 916.53 / Avg: 1040.2 / Max: 1438.39

OpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Memory AllocationsWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance20406080100SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 392.7192.99
OpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Memory AllocationsWindows 10Windows 10 - Performance20406080100Min: 92.56 / Avg: 92.71 / Max: 92.98Min: 92.61 / Avg: 92.99 / Max: 93.3

107 Results Shown

ParaView:
  Many Spheres - 3840 x 2160:
    Frames / Sec
    MiPolys / Sec
  Wavelet Volume - 3840 x 2160:
    Frames / Sec
    MiVoxels / Sec
  Wavelet Contour - 3840 x 2160:
    Frames / Sec
    MiPolys / Sec
t-test1:
  1
  2
LeelaChessZero:
  BLAS
  Rand
Timed MrBayes Analysis
Go Benchmarks:
  http
  json
  build
  garbage
DaCapo Benchmark:
  H2
  Jython
  Tradesoap
  Tradebeans
Renaissance:
  Apache Spark ALS
  Apache Spark Bayes
  Savina Reactors.IO
  Apache Spark PageRank
  Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree
Crafty
TSCP
GraphicsMagick:
  Swirl
  Rotate
  Sharpen
  Enhanced
  Resizing
  Noise-Gaussian
  HWB Color Space
Embree:
  Pathtracer - Crown
  Pathtracer ISPC - Crown
  Pathtracer - Asian Dragon
  Pathtracer - Asian Dragon Obj
  Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon
  Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon Obj
rav1e
SVT-AV1:
  Enc Mode 0 - 1080p
  Enc Mode 4 - 1080p
  Enc Mode 8 - 1080p
SVT-HEVC
SVT-VP9:
  VMAF Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p
  PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p
  Visual Quality Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p
x264
Intel Open Image Denoise
LuxCoreRender:
  DLSC
  Rainbow Colors and Prism
7-Zip Compression
Stockfish
asmFish
XZ Compression
Zstd Compression
FLAC Audio Encoding
LAME MP3 Encoding
m-queens
Minion:
  Graceful
  Solitaire
  Quasigroup
N-Queens
Perl Benchmarks:
  Pod2html
  Interpreter
libjpeg-turbo tjbench
Optcarrot
Chaos Group V-RAY
Blender:
  BMW27 - CPU-Only
  Classroom - CPU-Only
  Fishy Cat - CPU-Only
  Barbershop - CPU-Only
  Pabellon Barcelona - CPU-Only
PyBench
NeatBench
Appleseed:
  Emily
  Disney Material
  Material Tester
Geekbench:
  CPU Multi Core
  CPU Single Core
Novabench:
  CPU
  RAM
  RAM
Selenium:
  ARES-6 - Firefox
  Octane - Firefox
  Jetstream - Firefox
  CanvasMark - Firefox
  StyleBench - Firefox
  Maze Solver - Firefox
  Speedometer - Firefox
  ARES-6 - Google Chrome
  Octane - Google Chrome
  PSPDFKit WASM - Firefox
  Jetstream - Google Chrome
  CanvasMark - Google Chrome
  StyleBench - Google Chrome
  Maze Solver - Google Chrome
  Speedometer - Google Chrome
  PSPDFKit WASM - Google Chrome
Git
Tesseract OCR
SPECjbb 2015:
  SPECjbb2015-Composite max-jOPS
  SPECjbb2015-Composite critical-jOPS
OSBench:
  Create Files
  Create Threads
  Launch Programs
  Memory Allocations

Windows 10

Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.1-ojdkbuild+13-LTS)
Python Notes: Python 3.7.1
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization: Disabled + Retpoline: Full + IBPB: Always + STIBP: Enabled

Testing initiated at 25 November 2019 11:19 by user phoronix.

Windows 10 - Performance

Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 3.69GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (0601 BIOS), Memory: 4 x 16384 MB 3600MHz CMT64GX4M4Z3600C16, Disk: 932GB Force MP600, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 580 4GB, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 160MHz + Intel I211 Gigabit Connection

OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 18363, Kernel: 10.0 (x86_64), Display Driver: 26.20.12028.2, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2841.19), Compiler: GCC 7.1.0, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.1-ojdkbuild+13-LTS)
Python Notes: Python 3.7.1
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization: Disabled + Retpoline: Full + IBPB: Always + STIBP: Enabled

Testing initiated at 26 November 2019 05:05 by user phoronix.