2 x AMD EPYC 9554 vs. 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H vs. 2 x AMD EPYC 9654 vs. 2 x AMD EPYC 7773X Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 129 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

2 x AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core had the most wins, coming in first place for 71% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (2 x AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core) was 1.642x the speed of the slowest (2 x AMD EPYC 7773X 64-Core). 2 x AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core was 0.906x the speed of 2 x AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core, 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H was 0.762x the speed of 2 x AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core, 2 x AMD EPYC 7773X 64-Core was 0.882x the speed of 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H.

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: OpenVINO (Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU) at 3.702x, Sysbench (Test: CPU) at 2.883x, Xmrig (Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M) at 2.534x, Xmrig (Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M) at 2.505x, ASKAP (Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding) at 2.485x, Xmrig (Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M) at 2.36x, ASKAP (Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding) at 2.248x, NAS Parallel Benchmarks (Test / Class: FT.C) at 2.198x, Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark at 2.184x, Intel Open Image Denoise (Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160) at 2.169x.

129 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread