AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT vs. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs. AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs. Intel Core i9-10980XE Benchmarks

Add Processor To Compare:

* Note: Due to differences in Linux drivers/interfaces, the reported CPU clock may be displayed different depending upon the CPU - i.e. base vs. boost frequency.
* Disclosure: OpenBenchmarking.org may earn a commission/referral on affiliate shopping links should you decide to make any purchases from the third-party shopping links.

Of the components selected for comparison, there were 118 benchmarks in common (matching test profile, test version and any configurable test options) and where that data was statistically significant and at least three independent data points for each component of the public test results on OpenBenchmarking.org.

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core had the most wins, coming in first place for 66% of the tests.

Based on the geometric mean of all complete results, the fastest (AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core) was 1.791x the speed of the slowest (AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Eight-Core). AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core was 0.982x the speed of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core, Intel Core i9-10980XE was 0.806x the speed of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core, AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-Core was 0.905x the speed of Intel Core i9-10980XE, AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Eight-Core was 0.779x the speed of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-Core.

The results with the greatest spread from best to worst included: LuxCoreRender (Scene: DLSC) at 6.04x, Basis Universal (Settings: UASTC Level 3) at 4.583x, Tungsten Renderer (Scene: Volumetric Caustic) at 3.438x, Timed GCC Compilation (Time To Compile) at 2.162x, Timed MAFFT Alignment (Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA) at 1.884x, lzbench (Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression) at 1.806x, Tungsten Renderer (Scene: Water Caustic) at 1.788x, RNNoise at 1.78x, Radiance Benchmark (Test: SMP Parallel) at 1.768x, simdjson (Throughput Test: DistinctUserID) at 1.667x.

118 Benchmarks Found In Common - Sort By: Greatest Spread