AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
a Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: amd-pstate-epp powersave (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0xa601203Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 17.0.8.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.04)Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of safe RET no microcode + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
b c Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core @ 5.88GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14d8, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 1000GB + 4001GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 4000GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB (2304/1249MHz), Audio: AMD Device ab30, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411
OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.6.0-060600rc1daily20230915-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.3, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.3~git2309150600.b73ebc~oibaf~l (git-b73ebc6 2023-09-15 lunar-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.54), Compiler: GCC 12.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 c b a 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.85, N = 7 117.41 120.69 108.38 MAX: 10199.56 MAX: 12225.51 MAX: 13956.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c b a 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.16, N = 3 90.24 83.12 92.49 MAX: 24639.46 MAX: 24141.42 MAX: 24346.44
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 c b a 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 3.60, N = 4 394.31 420.65 380.92 MAX: 27034.51 MAX: 27561.44 MAX: 29652.8
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 c b a 14M 28M 42M 56M 70M SE +/- 757280.80, N = 4 60284179 57416198 63366776
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.78, N = 3 72.78 77.83 71.22 MAX: 24098.48 MAX: 25037.79 MAX: 24309.32
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 c b a 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 5.09, N = 12 321.45 301.34 294.92 MAX: 27476.79 MAX: 26678.83 MAX: 27385.45
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c b a 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 21.45 20.54 19.89 MAX: 25044.48 MAX: 24034.3 MAX: 24062.58
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c b a 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 6336.73, N = 3 2172908 2268190 2333922
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c b a 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.97, N = 7 144.34 134.85 138.65 MAX: 25502.51 MAX: 25717.75 MAX: 27394.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c b a 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 82.03 77.62 76.90 MAX: 24090.79 MAX: 24105.75 MAX: 24030.68
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c b a 11M 22M 33M 44M 55M SE +/- 621435.81, N = 3 46815916 49074804 46211451
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 c b a 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.07, N = 3 115.47 111.31 117.81 MAX: 25662.37 MAX: 25601.97 MAX: 26534.79
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 5M 10M 15M 20M 25M SE +/- 185743.49, N = 3 23767083 22781395 24099606
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 c b a 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 32.01 31.95 30.49 MAX: 12663.66 MAX: 12696.57 MAX: 13930.07
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c b a 13M 26M 39M 52M 65M SE +/- 740166.47, N = 3 56520942 59336712 59128867
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 c b a 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 114.63 109.36 111.11 MAX: 24158.29 MAX: 24212.34 MAX: 24298.34
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 c b a 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 12400.87, N = 3 2305443 2301811 2400881
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 c b a 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 64.09 66.75 66.16 MAX: 24042 MAX: 24068.21 MAX: 24050.3
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 c b a 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.92, N = 3 153.57 155.13 148.99 MAX: 26372.74 MAX: 26399.55 MAX: 26148.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 c b a 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.29, N = 4 109.75 112.00 107.81 MAX: 26434.44 MAX: 26205.95 MAX: 26071.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 c b a 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 119.43 118.45 115.17 MAX: 26235.64 MAX: 26295.92 MAX: 26142.53
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 c b a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 18851.62, N = 4 1562644 1562902 1613475
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 62.41 62.75 64.31 MAX: 24075.5 MAX: 24094.19 MAX: 24076.49
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.79, N = 9 125.98 124.46 122.27 MAX: 25501.83 MAX: 25503.25 MAX: 27636.07
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 c b a 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 236.95 243.38 243.90 MAX: 26882.87 MAX: 26746.09 MAX: 26446.85
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 c b a 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 2940.91, N = 3 2327378 2319724 2387727
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 c b a 700K 1400K 2100K 2800K 3500K SE +/- 34235.55, N = 3 3207506 3212002 3300800
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 c b a 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 4.59, N = 3 151.60 150.49 154.63 MAX: 25812.54 MAX: 25889.75 MAX: 25687.08
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 c b a 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 6153.07, N = 3 2307678 2288796 2350761
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 c b a 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 77.93 78.82 76.79 MAX: 26269.37 MAX: 26603.74 MAX: 26043.36
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 2145.24, N = 3 282644 282208 275408
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.58, N = 4 114.12 113.55 116.53 MAX: 25433.58 MAX: 25493.91 MAX: 26522.47
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 c b a 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 4676.66, N = 3 1030679 1057656 1044751
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 c b a 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 7900.65, N = 3 1100266 1072586 1073520
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 c b a 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 23.27 23.22 22.70 MAX: 24049.92 MAX: 24014.81 MAX: 24047.49
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 33.55 33.53 32.79 MAX: 24023.69 MAX: 24056.28 MAX: 24028.15
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 12M 24M 36M 48M 60M SE +/- 242345.40, N = 3 54274416 54509378 55486714
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 41.66 41.42 40.75 MAX: 12684.37 MAX: 13933.07 MAX: 12681.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 c b a 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 70.44 68.92 69.74 MAX: 26241.42 MAX: 26208.7 MAX: 26058.64
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 c b a 13M 26M 39M 52M 65M SE +/- 86803.07, N = 3 59491647 60751277 60680480
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K SE +/- 7520.06, N = 3 672272 680185 666208
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c b a 6M 12M 18M 24M 30M SE +/- 270392.91, N = 7 28319272 28883457 28779552
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 c b a 9M 18M 27M 36M 45M SE +/- 148534.21, N = 3 43370147 43115992 43969867
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 c b a 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 105.10 104.10 103.08 MAX: 26203.91 MAX: 26167.86 MAX: 26048.07
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c b a 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 29.50 29.28 29.84 MAX: 15199.7 MAX: 12691.57 MAX: 13942.61
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c b a 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 17290.89, N = 3 1564068 1571369 1542644
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 c b a 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 129.55 127.81 127.26 MAX: 27540.53 MAX: 26145.68 MAX: 26125.54
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 c b a 14M 28M 42M 56M 70M SE +/- 75702.90, N = 3 64872419 65170476 66036671
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 18.03 18.12 17.83 MAX: 24047.48 MAX: 24027.72 MAX: 24051.34
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 c b a 700K 1400K 2100K 2800K 3500K SE +/- 8480.62, N = 3 3292219 3285279 3338257
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 27.06 27.18 27.47 MAX: 11400.34 MAX: 12672.82 MAX: 15198.71
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 3402.41, N = 3 1029206 1025200 1039202
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c b a 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 63.88 64.37 64.67 MAX: 24025.26 MAX: 24063.93 MAX: 24117.06
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 9M 18M 27M 36M 45M SE +/- 463291.38, N = 3 43609499 43631995 44086345
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 c b a 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 2896.57, N = 3 667272 666871 673813
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 c b a 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 7090.53, N = 3 559364 563027 557503
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 c b a 12M 24M 36M 48M 60M SE +/- 161139.11, N = 3 54991357 55437594 55415518
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M SE +/- 109937.64, N = 9 13095792 13110339 13200040
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 c b a 9M 18M 27M 36M 45M SE +/- 526246.07, N = 3 40793713 41013193 41074687
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c b a 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 4403.54, N = 3 355002 354976 352679
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 c b a 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 87.78 87.79 87.27 MAX: 26352.7 MAX: 26397.87 MAX: 26146.37
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c b a 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.29, N = 3 114.96 115.42 115.54 MAX: 25572.07 MAX: 25530.74 MAX: 26538.67
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 c b a 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1508.71, N = 4 144051 143700 143489
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c b a 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K SE +/- 3362.00, N = 3 694105 691695 693339
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c 15 30 45 60 75 67.28 MAX: 12732.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 c b a 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 61.62, N = 9 556.30 631.73 219.03 MAX: 27277.01 MAX: 27003.62 MAX: 26719.11
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 c b a 40M 80M 120M 160M 200M SE +/- 24691002.47, N = 9 51424282 46154058 187118721
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 c b a 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 16.41, N = 12 165.56 165.60 53.55 MAX: 24131.75 MAX: 24071.78 MAX: 24074.83
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 c b a 50M 100M 150M 200M 250M SE +/- 31197302.81, N = 12 45601989 45376741 237561429
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 c b a 13M 26M 39M 52M 65M SE +/- 1060568.93, N = 12 56871661 59892865 60554222
Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
a Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: amd-pstate-epp powersave (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0xa601203Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 17.0.8.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.04)Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of safe RET no microcode + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 17 September 2023 12:24 by user pts.
b Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: amd-pstate-epp powersave (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0xa601203Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 17.0.8.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.04)Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of safe RET no microcode + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 17 September 2023 17:34 by user pts.
c Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core @ 5.88GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14d8, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 1000GB + 4001GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 4000GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB (2304/1249MHz), Audio: AMD Device ab30, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411
OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.6.0-060600rc1daily20230915-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.3, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.3~git2309150600.b73ebc~oibaf~l (git-b73ebc6 2023-09-15 lunar-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.54), Compiler: GCC 12.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: amd-pstate-epp powersave (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0xa601203Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 17.0.8.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.04)Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of safe RET no microcode + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 17 September 2023 19:08 by user pts.