AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB on Ubuntu 23.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
a Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: amd-pstate-epp powersave (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0xa601203Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 17.0.8.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.04)Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of safe RET no microcode + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
b c Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core @ 5.88GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14d8, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 1000GB + 4001GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 4000GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB (2304/1249MHz), Audio: AMD Device ab30, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411
OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.6.0-060600rc1daily20230915-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.3, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.3~git2309150600.b73ebc~oibaf~l (git-b73ebc6 2023-09-15 lunar-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.54), Compiler: GCC 12.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b c 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.58, N = 4 116.53 113.55 114.12 MAX: 26522.47 MAX: 25493.91 MAX: 25433.58
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b c 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 4403.54, N = 3 352679 354976 355002
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b c 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.29, N = 3 115.54 115.42 114.96 MAX: 26538.67 MAX: 25530.74 MAX: 25572.07
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 7090.53, N = 3 557503 563027 559364
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.07, N = 3 117.81 111.31 115.47 MAX: 26534.79 MAX: 25601.97 MAX: 25662.37
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b c 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 2145.24, N = 3 275408 282208 282644
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b c 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 64.31 62.75 62.41 MAX: 24076.49 MAX: 24094.19 MAX: 24075.5
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b c 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K SE +/- 3362.00, N = 3 693339 691695 694105
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b c 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 64.67 64.37 63.88 MAX: 24117.06 MAX: 24063.93 MAX: 24025.26
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 7900.65, N = 3 1073520 1072586 1100266
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 66.16 66.75 64.09 MAX: 24050.3 MAX: 24068.21 MAX: 24042
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b c 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K SE +/- 7520.06, N = 3 666208 680185 672272
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b c 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.41, N = 3 27.47 27.18 27.06 MAX: 15198.71 MAX: 12672.82 MAX: 11400.34
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a b c 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 2896.57, N = 3 673813 666871 667272
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a b c 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 103.08 104.10 105.10 MAX: 26048.07 MAX: 26167.86 MAX: 26203.91
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b c 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 17290.89, N = 3 1542644 1571369 1564068
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b c 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 29.84 29.28 29.50 MAX: 13942.61 MAX: 12691.57 MAX: 15199.7
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a b c 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 18851.62, N = 4 1613475 1562902 1562644
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a b c 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.29, N = 4 107.81 112.00 109.75 MAX: 26071.13 MAX: 26205.95 MAX: 26434.44
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 12400.87, N = 3 2400881 2301811 2305443
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 30.49 31.95 32.01 MAX: 13930.07 MAX: 12696.57 MAX: 12663.66
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a b c 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 2940.91, N = 3 2387727 2319724 2327378
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a b c 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 115.17 118.45 119.43 MAX: 26142.53 MAX: 26295.92 MAX: 26235.64
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b c 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 3402.41, N = 3 1039202 1025200 1029206
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b c 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 17.83 18.12 18.03 MAX: 24051.34 MAX: 24027.72 MAX: 24047.48
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a b c 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 4676.66, N = 3 1044751 1057656 1030679
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a b c 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 69.74 68.92 70.44 MAX: 26058.64 MAX: 26208.7 MAX: 26241.42
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b c 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 6336.73, N = 3 2333922 2268190 2172908
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b c 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 19.89 20.54 21.45 MAX: 24062.58 MAX: 24034.3 MAX: 25044.48
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a b c 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 6153.07, N = 3 2350761 2288796 2307678
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a b c 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 76.79 78.82 77.93 MAX: 26043.36 MAX: 26603.74 MAX: 26269.37
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 700K 1400K 2100K 2800K 3500K SE +/- 34235.55, N = 3 3300800 3212002 3207506
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 22.70 23.22 23.27 MAX: 24047.49 MAX: 24014.81 MAX: 24049.92
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a b c 700K 1400K 2100K 2800K 3500K SE +/- 8480.62, N = 3 3338257 3285279 3292219
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a b c 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 87.27 87.79 87.78 MAX: 26146.37 MAX: 26397.87 MAX: 26352.7
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b c 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M SE +/- 109937.64, N = 9 13200040 13110339 13095792
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b c 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.79, N = 9 122.27 124.46 125.98 MAX: 27636.07 MAX: 25503.25 MAX: 25501.83
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b c 6M 12M 18M 24M 30M SE +/- 270392.91, N = 7 28779552 28883457 28319272
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b c 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.97, N = 7 138.65 134.85 144.34 MAX: 27394.65 MAX: 25717.75 MAX: 25502.51
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 9M 18M 27M 36M 45M SE +/- 526246.07, N = 3 41074687 41013193 40793713
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 4.59, N = 3 154.63 150.49 151.60 MAX: 25687.08 MAX: 25889.75 MAX: 25812.54
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b c 5M 10M 15M 20M 25M SE +/- 185743.49, N = 3 24099606 22781395 23767083
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b c 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.78, N = 3 71.22 77.83 72.78 MAX: 24309.32 MAX: 25037.79 MAX: 24098.48
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b c 11M 22M 33M 44M 55M SE +/- 621435.81, N = 3 46211451 49074804 46815916
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b c 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.16, N = 3 92.49 83.12 90.24 MAX: 24346.44 MAX: 24141.42 MAX: 24639.46
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 13M 26M 39M 52M 65M SE +/- 86803.07, N = 3 60680480 60751277 59491647
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 111.11 109.36 114.63 MAX: 24298.34 MAX: 24212.34 MAX: 24158.29
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
c: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b c 9M 18M 27M 36M 45M SE +/- 463291.38, N = 3 44086345 43631995 43609499
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b c 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 40.75 41.42 41.66 MAX: 12681.14 MAX: 13933.07 MAX: 12684.37
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a b c 9M 18M 27M 36M 45M SE +/- 148534.21, N = 3 43969867 43115992 43370147
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a b c 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.92, N = 3 148.99 155.13 153.57 MAX: 26148.85 MAX: 26399.55 MAX: 26372.74
Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100
a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
b: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a b c 14M 28M 42M 56M 70M SE +/- 75702.90, N = 3 66036671 65170476 64872419
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a b c 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 243.90 243.38 236.95 MAX: 26446.85 MAX: 26746.09 MAX: 26882.87
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 14M 28M 42M 56M 70M SE +/- 622867.60, N = 7 67341865 59934745 59054946
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.85, N = 7 108.38 120.69 117.41 MAX: 13956.24 MAX: 12225.51 MAX: 10199.56
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a b c 14M 28M 42M 56M 70M SE +/- 757280.80, N = 4 63366776 57416198 60284179
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a b c 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 3.60, N = 4 380.92 420.65 394.31 MAX: 29652.8 MAX: 27561.44 MAX: 27034.51
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b c 12M 24M 36M 48M 60M SE +/- 242345.40, N = 3 55486714 54509378 54274416
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 a b c 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 32.79 33.53 33.55 MAX: 24028.15 MAX: 24056.28 MAX: 24023.69
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a b c 12M 24M 36M 48M 60M SE +/- 161139.11, N = 3 55415518 55437594 54991357
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 a b c 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 127.26 127.81 129.55 MAX: 26125.54 MAX: 26145.68 MAX: 27540.53
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b c 13M 26M 39M 52M 65M SE +/- 740166.47, N = 3 59128867 59336712 56520942
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 a b c 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 76.90 77.62 82.03 MAX: 24030.68 MAX: 24105.75 MAX: 24090.79
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a b c 13M 26M 39M 52M 65M SE +/- 1060568.93, N = 12 60554222 59892865 56871661
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 a b c 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 5.09, N = 12 294.92 301.34 321.45 MAX: 27385.45 MAX: 26678.83 MAX: 27476.79
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 50M 100M 150M 200M 250M SE +/- 31197302.81, N = 12 237561429 45376741 45601989
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 a b c 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 16.41, N = 12 53.55 165.60 165.56 MAX: 24074.83 MAX: 24071.78 MAX: 24131.75
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a b c 40M 80M 120M 160M 200M SE +/- 24691002.47, N = 9 187118721 46154058 51424282
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 a b c 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 61.62, N = 9 219.03 631.73 556.30 MAX: 26719.11 MAX: 27003.62 MAX: 27277.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 c 15 30 45 60 75 67.28 MAX: 12732.69
a Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: amd-pstate-epp powersave (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0xa601203Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 17.0.8.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.04)Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of safe RET no microcode + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 17 September 2023 12:24 by user pts.
b Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: amd-pstate-epp powersave (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0xa601203Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 17.0.8.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.04)Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of safe RET no microcode + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 17 September 2023 17:34 by user pts.
c Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core @ 5.88GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI (1416 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 14d8, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 1000GB + 4001GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850X 4000GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB (2304/1249MHz), Audio: AMD Device ab30, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411
OS: Ubuntu 23.04, Kernel: 6.6.0-060600rc1daily20230915-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 44.3, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.7 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 23.3~git2309150600.b73ebc~oibaf~l (git-b73ebc6 2023-09-15 lunar-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 15.0.7 DRM 3.54), Compiler: GCC 12.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: amd-pstate-epp powersave (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0xa601203Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 17.0.8.1+1-Ubuntu-0ubuntu123.04)Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Mitigation of safe RET no microcode + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 17 September 2023 19:08 by user pts.