Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H Linux Benchmarks Tests for a future article on Phoronix of Sapphire Rapids launch day review using the Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H processors. More benchmarks to come by Michael Larabel.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2301109-PTS-SPRREVIE33&sgm=1&rmm=EPYC+7713%2CEPYC+7713+2P%2CEPYC+7763%2CEPYC+7763+2P%2CEPYC+7773X%2CEPYC+7773X+2P%2CEPYC+9374F%2CEPYC+9554%2CEPYC+9554+2P%2CEPYC+9654%2CEPYC+9654+2P%2CXeon+Platinum+8362%2CXeon+Platinum+8362+2P%2CXeon+Platinum+8380%2CXeon+Platinum+8380+2P%2CXeon+Platinum+8490H+2P&ppt=D&sgm=1&rmm=EPYC+7713%2CEPYC+7713+2P%2CEPYC+7763%2CEPYC+7763+2P%2CEPYC+7773X%2CEPYC+7773X+2P%2CEPYC+9374F+2P%2CEPYC+9554%2CEPYC+9554+2P%2CEPYC+9654%2CEPYC+9654+2P%2CXeon+Platinum+8362%2CXeon+Platinum+8362+2P%2CXeon+Platinum+8380%2CXeon+Platinum+8380+2P%2CXeon+Platinum+8490H+2P&ppt=D&sgm=1&rmm=EPYC+7713%2CEPYC+7713+2P%2CEPYC+7763%2CEPYC+7763+2P%2CEPYC+7773X%2CEPYC+7773X+2P%2CEPYC+9374F%2CEPYC+9554%2CEPYC+9554+2P%2CEPYC+9654%2CEPYC+9654+2P%2CXeon+Platinum+8362%2CXeon+Platinum+8362+2P%2CXeon+Platinum+8380%2CXeon+Platinum+8380+2P%2CXeon+Platinum+8490H+2P&ppt=D .
Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H Linux Benchmarks Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Vulkan Compiler File-System Screen Resolution EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 2 x AMD EPYC 9374F 32-Core @ 4.31GHz (64 Cores / 128 Threads) AMD Titanite_4G (RTI1002E BIOS) AMD Device 14a4 1520GB 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP ASPEED VGA HDMI Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 PCIe Ubuntu 22.10 6.0.0-060000rc3daily20220904-generic (x86_64) GNOME Shell X Server 1.21.1.3 1.3.211 GCC 12.2.0 ext4 1920x1080 Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H @ 3.50GHz (60 Cores / 120 Threads) Quanta Cloud S6Q-MB-MPS (3A10.uh BIOS) Intel Device 1bce 512GB 4 x Intel E810-C for QSFP OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-defaulted --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-12-Wbc0TK/gcc-12-12.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-12-Wbc0TK/gcc-12-12.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v Processor Details - EPYC 9374F 2P: Scaling Governor: amd-pstate performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xa10110d - Xeon Platinum 8490H: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x2b0000c0 Java Details - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1) Python Details - Python 3.10.6 Security Details - EPYC 9374F 2P: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Retpolines IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: always-on RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected - Xeon Platinum 8490H: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H Linux Benchmarks gromacs: MPI CPU - water_GMX50_bare namd: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms graph500: 26 graph500: 26 hpcg: wrf: conus 2.5km relion: Basic - CPU amg: incompact3d: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction incompact3d: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d lulesh: pennant: leblancbig mt-dgemm: Sustained Floating-Point Rate npb: BT.C npb: EP.C npb: EP.D npb: SP.B npb: SP.C npb: MG.C npb: CG.C rodinia: OpenMP LavaMD openvino: Face Detection FP16 - CPU openvino: Face Detection FP16 - CPU openvino: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - CPU openvino: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - CPU openvino: Person Detection FP16 - CPU openvino: Person Detection FP16 - CPU openvino: Person Detection FP32 - CPU openvino: Person Detection FP32 - CPU openvino: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - CPU openvino: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - CPU openvino: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - CPU openvino: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - CPU openvino: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - CPU openvino: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - CPU lczero: Eigen onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - f32 - CPU onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - f32 - CPU build-llvm: Ninja build-llvm: Unix Makefiles build-godot: Time To Compile build-linux-kernel: defconfig build-linux-kernel: allmodconfig build-nodejs: Time To Compile dacapobench: Jython compress-7zip: Compression Rating compress-7zip: Decompression Rating blender: BMW27 - CPU-Only blender: Classroom - CPU-Only blender: Fishy Cat - CPU-Only blender: Pabellon Barcelona - CPU-Only blender: Barbershop - CPU-Only c-ray: Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel povray: Trace Time embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon oidn: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 oidn: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 oidn: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 ospray: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time ospray: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time ospray-studio: 1 - 4K - 1 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 1 - 4K - 16 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 1 - 4K - 32 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 2 - 4K - 1 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 2 - 4K - 16 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 2 - 4K - 32 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 3 - 4K - 1 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 3 - 4K - 16 - Path Tracer ospray-studio: 3 - 4K - 32 - Path Tracer graphics-magick: Enhanced graphics-magick: Sharpen astcenc: Medium astcenc: Thorough astcenc: Exhaustive node-express-loadtest: simdjson: PartialTweets simdjson: LargeRand simdjson: DistinctUserID simdjson: TopTweet brl-cad: VGR Performance Metric pybench: Total For Average Test Times pyperformance: crypto_pyaes pyperformance: django_template pyperformance: json_loads pyperformance: regex_compile phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suite liquid-dsp: 128 - 256 - 57 liquid-dsp: 256 - 256 - 57 quantlib: openssl: RSA4096 openssl: RSA4096 coremark: CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second asmfish: 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth tachyon: Total Time openfoam: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size - Execution Time openfoam: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Execution Time onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - f32 - CPU onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - bf16bf16bf16 - CPU deepsparse: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Synchronous Single-Stream deepsparse: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Synchronous Single-Stream deepsparse: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Asynchronous Multi-Stream deepsparse: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Asynchronous Multi-Stream openradioss: Cell Phone Drop Test openradioss: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 11.381 0.25046 390219000 489222000 85.8041 5862.918 182.149 4265216400 5.98610687 159.467219 51738.127 3.367687 29.838690 302441.14 8597.99 9598.66 204821.69 205350.61 213628.28 65076.71 28.923 46.47 343.72 87.95 124281.62 0.47 21.72 732.72 21.89 727.81 9148.24 4563.79 3.49 4177.55 481.55 33.20 12132 0.573134 0.270187 1.04713 101.384 158.031 32.419 21.427 160.952 116.910 2981 509195 565323 16.78 41.99 22.15 53.02 164.15 7.744 7.114 102.8936 2.66 2.65 1.25 22.0194 27.3766 1259 20202 40354 1286 20479 40961 1509 24084 48185 1224 712 418.8604 56.7799 5.7189 8145 6.59 1.45 7.94 7.63 1200576 734 76.5 31.2 14.2 99.8 996074 5050200000 5103433333 3498.1 19482.3 1265197.7 2367509.990069 210118141 17.7884 26.052598 169.18708 0.575132 0.277574 0.399543 237.4495 4.2091 925.8900 40.3526 399.4904 432.6680 40.4444 20.45 114.47 8.581 0.29076 323231000 450856000 32.0770 11881.128 402.132 1616971667 12.8350466 352.794106 25990.516 5.206269 22.411594 179308.21 6988.76 7832.08 111530.94 71661.25 84251.85 33480.76 42.640 70.58 424.67 150.87 82929.06 0.62 25.55 1167.83 25.53 1169.15 16703.64 7839.51 7.52 3656.94 448.59 66.66 10513 0.636394 0.492516 1.10812 155.921 216.613 42.133 31.646 263.288 174.867 2557 378741 291248 25.52 67.68 36.05 88.96 277.99 10.667 9.809 83.2084 2.63 2.64 1.25 19.6102 24.1169 1603 25685 51326 1627 26095 52081 1931 30888 67518 1132 692 287.8179 42.0275 4.0722 11902 5.60 1.30 6.53 6.77 829046 771 79.0 34.9 18.7 132 947570 3468033333 3583066667 3167.9 14735.9 979532.1 2162643.678448 130447170 25.8262 42.688031 418.90255 0.645779 0.519451 0.281812 279.4595 3.5734 769.7793 47.4454 192.9925 318.9325 47.2877 32.38 152.91 OpenBenchmarking.org
GROMACS Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day, More Is Better GROMACS 2022.1 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.020, N = 3 SE +/- 0.006, N = 3 11.381 8.581 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
GROMACS Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day Per Watt, More Is Better GROMACS 2022.1 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0061 0.0122 0.0183 0.0244 0.0305 0.027 0.027
GROMACS CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 47.4 415.9 510.5 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.8 314.9 376.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GROMACS 2022.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
NAMD ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0654 0.1308 0.1962 0.2616 0.327 SE +/- 0.00026, N = 4 SE +/- 0.00022, N = 3 0.25046 0.29076
NAMD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 47.3 408.4 556.1 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.2 298.3 375.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Graph500 Scale: 26 OpenBenchmarking.org sssp median_TEPS, More Is Better Graph500 3.0 Scale: 26 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 80M 160M 240M 320M 400M 390219000 323231000 1. (CC) gcc options: -fcommon -O3 -lpthread -lm -lmpi
Graph500 Scale: 26 OpenBenchmarking.org sssp max_TEPS, More Is Better Graph500 3.0 Scale: 26 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 100M 200M 300M 400M 500M 489222000 450856000 1. (CC) gcc options: -fcommon -O3 -lpthread -lm -lmpi
Graph500 Scale: 26 OpenBenchmarking.org sssp max_TEPS Per Watt, More Is Better Graph500 3.0 Scale: 26 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1151296.76 1300137.08
Graph500 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 47.4 424.9 500.5 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.8 346.8 362.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Graph500 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
High Performance Conjugate Gradient OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.71, N = 12 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 85.80 32.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
High Performance Conjugate Gradient OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s Per Watt, More Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0421 0.0842 0.1263 0.1684 0.2105 0.187 0.094
High Performance Conjugate Gradient CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 90 180 270 360 450 Min: 45.5 / Avg: 458.51 / Max: 498.01 Min: 82.56 / Avg: 341.72 / Max: 363.55
WRF Input: conus 2.5km OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better WRF 4.2.2 Input: conus 2.5km EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 5862.92 11881.13 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O2 -ftree-vectorize -funroll-loops -ffree-form -fconvert=big-endian -frecord-marker=4 -fallow-invalid-boz -lesmf_time -lwrfio_nf -lnetcdff -lnetcdf -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz
WRF CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better WRF 4.2.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 100 200 300 400 500 Min: 46.28 / Avg: 474.81 / Max: 539.07 Min: 81.39 / Avg: 348.3 / Max: 375.99
RELION Test: Basic - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 Test: Basic - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.40, N = 10 SE +/- 4.31, N = 3 182.15 402.13 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -std=c++0x -O3 -rdynamic -ldl -ltiff -lfftw3f -lfftw3 -lpng -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
RELION CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RELION 3.1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 110 220 330 440 550 Min: 45.77 / Avg: 516.81 / Max: 617.18 Min: 79.01 / Avg: 343.9 / Max: 377.68
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 900M 1800M 2700M 3600M 4500M SE +/- 19154752.35, N = 5 SE +/- 775406.63, N = 3 4265216400 1616971667 1. (CC) gcc options: -lparcsr_ls -lparcsr_mv -lseq_mv -lIJ_mv -lkrylov -lHYPRE_utilities -lm -fopenmp -lmpi
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Figure Of Merit Per Watt, More Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M 12540912.80 5345955.32
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.5 340.1 511.8 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.8 302.5 362.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Xcompact3d Incompact3d Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02895844, N = 6 SE +/- 0.00718141, N = 4 5.98610687 12.83504660 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -O2 -funroll-loops -floop-optimize -fcray-pointer -fbacktrace -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz
Xcompact3d Incompact3d CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.6 293.0 485.1 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.9 285.6 376.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Xcompact3d Incompact3d Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 4.13, N = 4 159.47 352.79 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -cpp -O2 -funroll-loops -floop-optimize -fcray-pointer -fbacktrace -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz
Xcompact3d Incompact3d CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.8 436.0 459.4 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.6 345.7 364.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
LULESH OpenBenchmarking.org z/s, More Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 176.84, N = 5 SE +/- 39.15, N = 6 51738.13 25990.52 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp -lm -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
LULESH OpenBenchmarking.org z/s Per Watt, More Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 40 80 120 160 200 183.36 110.65
LULESH CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.7 282.2 468.6 Xeon Platinum 8490H 80.8 234.9 341.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LULESH 2.0.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Pennant Test: leblancbig OpenBenchmarking.org Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 1.1714 2.3428 3.5142 4.6856 5.857 SE +/- 0.034909, N = 15 SE +/- 0.034026, N = 7 3.367687 5.206269 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
Pennant CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.9 244.6 524.2 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.8 236.7 377.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Pennant 1.0.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
ACES DGEMM Sustained Floating-Point Rate OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.04, N = 6 SE +/- 0.19, N = 5 29.84 22.41 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
ACES DGEMM Sustained Floating-Point Rate OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s Per Watt, More Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0227 0.0454 0.0681 0.0908 0.1135 0.101 0.085
ACES DGEMM CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.3 295.7 438.8 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.4 264.5 377.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: BT.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 630.64, N = 5 SE +/- 335.77, N = 3 302441.14 179308.21 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz 2. Open MPI 4.1.4
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: BT.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 200 400 600 800 1000 855.26 603.77
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.2 353.6 508.8 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.4 297.0 376.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 150.43, N = 15 SE +/- 62.59, N = 15 8597.99 6988.76 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz 2. Open MPI 4.1.4
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 13 26 39 52 65 60.24 43.72
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.3 142.7 483.5 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.9 159.8 375.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.D OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 102.74, N = 5 SE +/- 26.92, N = 3 9598.66 7832.08 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz 2. Open MPI 4.1.4
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: EP.D OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 6 12 18 24 30 26.41 26.26
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 44.9 363.5 491.4 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.0 298.3 376.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: SP.B OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 2246.19, N = 15 SE +/- 226.33, N = 8 204821.69 111530.94 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz 2. Open MPI 4.1.4
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: SP.B OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 200 400 600 800 1000 1080.36 526.96
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.3 189.6 515.2 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.0 211.7 377.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: SP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 1012.16, N = 6 SE +/- 179.87, N = 3 205350.61 71661.25 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz 2. Open MPI 4.1.4
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: SP.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.C EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 130 260 390 520 650 613.31 235.24
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.6 334.8 529.0 Xeon Platinum 8490H 84.4 304.6 374.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: MG.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 3594.43, N = 15 SE +/- 121.29, N = 10 213628.28 84251.85 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz 2. Open MPI 4.1.4
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: MG.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1641.78 471.09
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.7 130.1 453.2 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.4 178.8 347.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: CG.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 913.13, N = 15 SE +/- 132.41, N = 7 65076.71 33480.76 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lhwloc -levent_core -levent_pthreads -lm -lz 2. Open MPI 4.1.4
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: CG.C OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s Per Watt, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 70 140 210 280 350 303.41 145.76
NAS Parallel Benchmarks CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.1 214.5 519.1 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.5 229.7 377.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Rodinia Test: OpenMP LavaMD OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 28.92 42.64 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
Rodinia CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.8 397.6 550.3 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.9 294.0 377.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
OpenVINO Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 46.47 70.58 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -flto -shared
OpenVINO Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 343.72 424.67 MIN: 339.3 / MAX: 405.41 MIN: 324.89 / MAX: 491.29 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -flto -shared
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.2 500.0 570.7 Xeon Platinum 8490H 80.4 324.3 377.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
OpenVINO Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Face Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 87.95 150.87 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -flto -shared
OpenVINO Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1336.51, N = 4 SE +/- 111.96, N = 3 124281.62 82929.06 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -flto -shared
OpenVINO Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.1395 0.279 0.4185 0.558 0.6975 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.47 0.62 MIN: 0.43 / MAX: 26.02 MIN: 0.31 / MAX: 23.57 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -flto -shared
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.3 494.1 560.4 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.3 331.5 376.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
OpenVINO Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 21.72 25.55 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -flto -shared
OpenVINO Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.96, N = 3 SE +/- 2.53, N = 3 732.72 1167.83 MIN: 650.79 / MAX: 1076.16 MIN: 600.36 / MAX: 1656.84 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -flto -shared
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.0 455.4 514.5 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.8 323.3 368.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OpenVINO Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.26, N = 4 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 21.89 25.53 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -flto -shared
OpenVINO Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Detection FP32 - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 8.46, N = 4 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 727.81 1169.15 MIN: 650.36 / MAX: 1087.25 MIN: 870.58 / MAX: 1651.76 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -flto -shared
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.0 457.7 517.1 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.0 325.8 365.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OpenVINO Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16-INT8 - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 4.12, N = 3 SE +/- 9.01, N = 3 9148.24 16703.64 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -flto -shared
OpenVINO Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 1.35, N = 3 SE +/- 60.72, N = 10 4563.79 7839.51 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -flto -shared
OpenVINO Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Weld Porosity Detection FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 10 3.49 7.52 MIN: 3.35 / MAX: 15.73 MIN: 2.66 / MAX: 31.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -flto -shared
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 47.0 506.8 564.5 Xeon Platinum 8490H 79.0 331.9 377.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
OpenVINO Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Person Vehicle Bike Detection FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 2.97, N = 3 SE +/- 5.03, N = 3 4177.55 3656.94 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -flto -shared
OpenVINO Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 481.55 448.59 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -flto -shared
OpenVINO Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev Model: Machine Translation EN To DE FP16 - Device: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 33.20 66.66 MIN: 30.37 / MAX: 84.29 MIN: 23.93 / MAX: 106.71 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -fsigned-char -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv -flto -shared
OpenVINO CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 24.4 484.4 527.5 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.2 327.7 375.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVINO 2022.2.dev CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: Eigen EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 115.11, N = 3 SE +/- 64.57, N = 3 12132 10513 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -pthread
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: Eigen EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 7 14 21 28 35 30.02 31.74
LeelaChessZero CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.1 404.2 484.7 Xeon Platinum 8490H 85.2 331.3 379.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.6 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.1432 0.2864 0.4296 0.5728 0.716 SE +/- 0.001673, N = 7 SE +/- 0.000967, N = 7 0.573134 0.636394 MIN: 0.53 MIN: 0.54 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -std=c++11 -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.0 284.1 488.3 Xeon Platinum 8490H 79.5 238.5 377.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.6 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.1108 0.2216 0.3324 0.4432 0.554 SE +/- 0.001063, N = 7 SE +/- 0.000571, N = 7 0.270187 0.492516 MIN: 0.23 MIN: 0.42 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -std=c++11 -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 44.0 277.6 506.1 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.3 248.8 377.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
oneDNN Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.6 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.2493 0.4986 0.7479 0.9972 1.2465 SE +/- 0.001199, N = 9 SE +/- 0.000893, N = 9 1.047130 1.108120 MIN: 1 MIN: 1.08 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -std=c++11 -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.7 210.8 441.3 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.0 208.2 367.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Timed LLVM Compilation Build System: Ninja OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Ninja EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 101.38 155.92
Timed LLVM Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.2 381.9 561.0 Xeon Platinum 8490H 85.2 295.8 375.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Timed LLVM Compilation Build System: Unix Makefiles OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 Build System: Unix Makefiles EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.70, N = 3 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 158.03 216.61
Timed LLVM Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.0 323.9 562.8 Xeon Platinum 8490H 84.6 278.4 376.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 13.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 32.42 42.13
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 44.7 293.2 540.4 Xeon Platinum 8490H 85.0 254.3 375.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Build: defconfig OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.18 Build: defconfig EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.22, N = 5 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 21.43 31.65
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.2 288.8 548.7 Xeon Platinum 8490H 84.6 242.5 376.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Build: allmodconfig OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.18 Build: allmodconfig EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 160.95 263.29
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.9 450.0 567.0 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.6 320.8 376.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Timed Node.js Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 18.8 Time To Compile EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 116.91 174.87
Timed Node.js Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.6 355.3 570.6 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.3 283.6 377.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 18.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
DaCapo Benchmark Java Test: Jython OpenBenchmarking.org msec, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 19.01, N = 8 SE +/- 20.10, N = 8 2981 2557
DaCapo Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.6 127.8 236.9 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.9 143.3 234.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
7-Zip Compression Test: Compression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Compression Rating EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 110K 220K 330K 440K 550K SE +/- 3743.38, N = 3 SE +/- 74.62, N = 3 509195 378741 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
7-Zip Compression Test: Decompression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 1596.03, N = 3 SE +/- 197.90, N = 3 565323 291248 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
7-Zip Compression Test: Decompression Rating OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS Per Watt, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 Test: Decompression Rating EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 300 600 900 1200 1500 1425.22 933.08
7-Zip Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.1 396.7 526.3 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.4 312.1 375.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better 7-Zip Compression 22.01 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Blender Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.3 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 16.78 25.52
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.7 417.0 583.3 Xeon Platinum 8490H 84.7 307.4 377.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
Blender Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.3 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 41.99 67.68
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 44.7 455.5 524.3 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.6 331.5 377.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Blender Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.3 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 22.15 36.05
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 44.8 430.4 583.1 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.1 315.7 376.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
Blender Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.3 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 53.02 88.96
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.9 482.2 591.9 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.5 334.4 379.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
Blender Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.3 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 164.15 277.99
Blender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.3 501.4 563.2 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.9 341.9 377.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Blender 3.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
C-Ray Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.012, N = 6 SE +/- 0.002, N = 5 7.744 10.667 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3
C-Ray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.2 315.8 487.9 Xeon Platinum 8490H 79.7 274.9 364.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
POV-Ray Trace Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.033, N = 5 SE +/- 0.055, N = 4 7.114 9.809 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -R/usr/lib -lSDL -lXpm -lSM -lICE -lX11 -ltiff -ljpeg -lpng -lz -lrt -lm -lboost_thread -lboost_system
POV-Ray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.2 277.7 567.0 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.5 249.5 377.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.35, N = 6 SE +/- 0.68, N = 6 102.89 83.21 MIN: 98.44 / MAX: 111.15 MIN: 73.06 / MAX: 101.5
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0738 0.1476 0.2214 0.2952 0.369 0.328 0.319
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.1 314.0 508.8 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.9 260.9 376.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.5985 1.197 1.7955 2.394 2.9925 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 2.66 2.63
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0027 0.0054 0.0081 0.0108 0.0135 0.010 0.012
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.5 262.5 503.8 Xeon Platinum 8490H 80.3 219.0 369.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.5963 1.1926 1.7889 2.3852 2.9815 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 2.65 2.64
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0027 0.0054 0.0081 0.0108 0.0135 0.010 0.012
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.7 265.7 503.8 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.8 219.5 371.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.2813 0.5626 0.8439 1.1252 1.4065 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.25 1.25
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0011 0.0022 0.0033 0.0044 0.0055 0.004 0.005
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.8 301.3 500.3 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.2 238.8 370.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPRay Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 22.02 19.61
OSPRay Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/ao/real_time EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0133 0.0266 0.0399 0.0532 0.0665 0.048 0.059
OSPRay CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 44.4 460.6 498.7 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.4 334.2 376.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPRay Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 27.38 24.12
OSPRay Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time OpenBenchmarking.org Items Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better OSPRay 2.10 Benchmark: gravity_spheres_volume/dim_512/pathtracer/real_time EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0162 0.0324 0.0486 0.0648 0.081 0.058 0.072
OSPRay CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.0 470.8 521.5 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.3 332.7 375.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay 2.10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 1259 1603 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 47.1 459.8 543.6 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.6 319.1 376.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 27.09, N = 3 SE +/- 33.98, N = 3 20202 25685 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.3 451.7 544.9 Xeon Platinum 8490H 80.7 318.1 377.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
OSPRay Studio Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 1 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 69.74, N = 3 SE +/- 73.00, N = 3 40354 51326 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.8 468.5 562.8 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.4 327.4 377.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 1286 1627 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.7 461.7 551.2 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.4 319.4 376.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 10.14, N = 3 SE +/- 36.19, N = 3 20479 26095 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 47.7 452.9 553.6 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.3 318.3 377.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
OSPRay Studio Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 2 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 67.41, N = 3 SE +/- 84.62, N = 3 40961 52081 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.5 470.7 529.8 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.9 327.4 378.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 1 - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 SE +/- 2.33, N = 3 1509 1931 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.4 463.1 528.3 Xeon Platinum 8490H 85.7 319.7 377.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 16 - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 12.41, N = 3 SE +/- 47.70, N = 3 24084 30888 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.7 459.5 549.5 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.6 315.1 377.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
OSPRay Studio Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 Camera: 3 - Resolution: 4K - Samples Per Pixel: 32 - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 78.66, N = 3 SE +/- 105.74, N = 3 48185 67518 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -ldl
OSPRay Studio CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.6 475.7 545.5 Xeon Platinum 8490H 85.9 302.9 377.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPRay Studio 0.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
GraphicsMagick Operation: Enhanced OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Enhanced EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 1224 1132 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -ljbig -lwebp -lwebpmux -ltiff -lfreetype -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lm -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Enhanced OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Enhanced EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.7675 1.535 2.3025 3.07 3.8375 3.076 3.411
GraphicsMagick CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.9 397.9 437.6 Xeon Platinum 8490H 84.3 331.9 368.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
GraphicsMagick Operation: Sharpen OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Sharpen EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 712 692 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -ljbig -lwebp -lwebpmux -ltiff -lfreetype -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -llzma -lbz2 -lxml2 -lz -lm -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Sharpen OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 Operation: Sharpen EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.4689 0.9378 1.4067 1.8756 2.3445 1.750 2.084
GraphicsMagick CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.9 406.8 449.8 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.8 332.1 367.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.38 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
ASTC Encoder Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Medium EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.48, N = 8 SE +/- 0.08, N = 7 418.86 287.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -pthread
ASTC Encoder Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s Per Watt, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Medium EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.5238 1.0476 1.5714 2.0952 2.619 2.328 1.656
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 44.8 179.9 487.7 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.8 173.8 375.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
ASTC Encoder Preset: Thorough OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Thorough EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.02, N = 6 SE +/- 0.02, N = 5 56.78 42.03 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -pthread
ASTC Encoder Preset: Thorough OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s Per Watt, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Thorough EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0477 0.0954 0.1431 0.1908 0.2385 0.212 0.189
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.0 267.5 575.7 Xeon Platinum 8490H 84.5 222.2 375.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
ASTC Encoder Preset: Exhaustive OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Exhaustive EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 1.2868 2.5736 3.8604 5.1472 6.434 SE +/- 0.0083, N = 4 SE +/- 0.0010, N = 4 5.7189 4.0722 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -pthread
ASTC Encoder Preset: Exhaustive OpenBenchmarking.org MT/s Per Watt, More Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 Preset: Exhaustive EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0041 0.0082 0.0123 0.0164 0.0205 0.018 0.016
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.4 323.5 553.8 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.0 259.6 376.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
Node.js Express HTTP Load Test OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Node.js Express HTTP Load Test EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 57.82, N = 4 SE +/- 27.68, N = 5 8145 11902
Node.js Express HTTP Load Test OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Node.js Express HTTP Load Test EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 20 40 60 80 100 51.74 78.22
Node.js Express HTTP Load Test CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.2 157.4 197.3 Xeon Platinum 8490H 84.6 152.2 184.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Node.js Express HTTP Load Test CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
simdjson Throughput Test: PartialTweets OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 6.59 5.60 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
simdjson Throughput Test: PartialTweets OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: PartialTweets EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0083 0.0166 0.0249 0.0332 0.0415 0.037 0.034
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.0 179.8 188.9 Xeon Platinum 8490H 85.5 164.1 173.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
simdjson Throughput Test: LargeRandom OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.3263 0.6526 0.9789 1.3052 1.6315 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.45 1.30 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
simdjson Throughput Test: LargeRandom OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: LargeRandom EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0018 0.0036 0.0054 0.0072 0.009 0.008 0.008
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.9 178.3 189.7 Xeon Platinum 8490H 84.8 166.2 174.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
simdjson Throughput Test: DistinctUserID OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 7.94 6.53 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
simdjson Throughput Test: DistinctUserID OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0099 0.0198 0.0297 0.0396 0.0495 0.044 0.040
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.2 180.2 189.1 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.6 163.8 169.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
simdjson Throughput Test: TopTweet OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 7.63 6.77 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
simdjson Throughput Test: TopTweet OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 2.0 Throughput Test: TopTweet EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0095 0.019 0.0285 0.038 0.0475 0.042 0.041
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 44.8 180.0 189.0 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.8 164.4 170.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
BRL-CAD VGR Performance Metric OpenBenchmarking.org VGR Performance Metric, More Is Better BRL-CAD 7.32.6 VGR Performance Metric EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1200576 829046 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -pipe -fvisibility=hidden -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fexceptions -ftemplate-depth-128 -m64 -ggdb3 -O3 -fipa-pta -fstrength-reduce -finline-functions -flto -pedantic -ldl -lm
BRL-CAD VGR Performance Metric OpenBenchmarking.org VGR Performance Metric Per Watt, More Is Better BRL-CAD 7.32.6 VGR Performance Metric EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2445.62 2412.52
BRL-CAD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 47.0 490.9 603.9 Xeon Platinum 8490H 84.6 343.6 378.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better BRL-CAD 7.32.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 160 320 480 640 800
PyBench Total For Average Test Times OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 170 340 510 680 850 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 SE +/- 2.96, N = 3 734 771
PyBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.4 161.2 189.7 Xeon Platinum 8490H 80.6 101.6 107.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
PyPerformance Benchmark: crypto_pyaes OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 76.5 79.0
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.7 170.4 189.0 Xeon Platinum 8490H 80.4 112.8 132.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
PyPerformance Benchmark: django_template OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 31.2 34.9
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 47.4 170.1 188.6 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.4 133.6 152.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
PyPerformance Benchmark: json_loads OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 14.2 18.7
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.8 168.5 188.3 Xeon Platinum 8490H 86.0 111.6 125.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
PyPerformance Benchmark: regex_compile OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 99.8 132.0
PyPerformance CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.4 168.8 188.9 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.4 119.4 153.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 5524.39, N = 3 SE +/- 2905.52, N = 3 996074 947570
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 6002.56 8979.23
PHPBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.6 165.9 188.4 Xeon Platinum 8490H 84.4 105.5 109.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Liquid-DSP Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 1100M 2200M 3300M 4400M 5500M SE +/- 2511971.34, N = 3 SE +/- 2667291.59, N = 3 5050200000 3468033333 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 128 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M 11967318.27 11282019.77
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.4 422.0 522.3 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.6 307.4 377.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Liquid-DSP Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 1100M 2200M 3300M 4400M 5500M SE +/- 22483277.74, N = 3 SE +/- 7522484.81, N = 3 5103433333 3583066667 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Liquid-DSP Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 256 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M 12122457.38 11674634.04
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.8 421.0 566.4 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.5 306.9 377.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
QuantLib OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better QuantLib 1.21 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 39.62, N = 3 SE +/- 25.54, N = 3 3498.1 3167.9 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic
QuantLib OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better QuantLib 1.21 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 7 14 21 28 35 20.98 28.77
QuantLib CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.5 166.8 189.2 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.1 110.1 159.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better QuantLib 1.21 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org sign/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 SE +/- 22.62, N = 3 19482.3 14735.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 33.15, N = 3 SE +/- 461.15, N = 3 1265197.7 979532.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 2945.51 2948.50
OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.4 429.5 485.1 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.0 332.2 366.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 120 240 360 480 600
Coremark CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 18009.90, N = 10 SE +/- 8023.55, N = 3 2367509.99 2162643.68 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt
Coremark CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 7280.37 7054.62
Coremark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.6 325.2 427.6 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.9 306.6 349.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Coremark 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 110 220 330 440 550
asmFish 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes/second, More Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 50M 100M 150M 200M 250M SE +/- 1108918.90, N = 3 SE +/- 712788.73, N = 3 210118141 130447170
asmFish 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes/second Per Watt, More Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K 445538.48 382297.10
asmFish CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.6 471.6 517.4 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.2 341.2 377.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better asmFish 2018-07-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Tachyon Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tachyon 0.99.2 Total Time EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 17.79 25.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -ltachyon -lm -lpthread
Tachyon CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 47.4 420.5 555.4 Xeon Platinum 8490H 79.4 312.3 377.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tachyon 0.99.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 110 220 330 440 550 Min: 22.99 / Avg: 379.52 / Max: 617.18 Min: 78.41 / Avg: 303.47 / Max: 379.53
OpenFOAM Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size - Execution Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Small Mesh Size - Execution Time EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 10 20 30 40 50 26.05 42.69 -lfoamToVTK -ldynamicMesh -lfileFormats -lfiniteVolume -lmeshTools -lparallel -lregionModels 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++14 -m64 -O3 -ftemplate-depth-100 -fPIC -fuse-ld=bfd -Xlinker --add-needed --no-as-needed -llagrangian -lgenericPatchFields -lOpenFOAM -ldl -lm
OpenFOAM CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.1 455.1 527.1 Xeon Platinum 8490H 81.9 326.8 374.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
OpenFOAM Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Execution Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 10 Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size - Execution Time EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 90 180 270 360 450 169.19 418.90 -lfoamToVTK -ldynamicMesh -lfileFormats -lfiniteVolume -lmeshTools -lparallel -lregionModels 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++14 -m64 -O3 -ftemplate-depth-100 -fPIC -fuse-ld=bfd -Xlinker --add-needed --no-as-needed -llagrangian -lgenericPatchFields -lOpenFOAM -ldl -lm
OpenFOAM CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.0 508.1 530.9 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.2 345.7 371.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 10 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.7 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.1453 0.2906 0.4359 0.5812 0.7265 SE +/- 0.000833, N = 7 SE +/- 0.000493, N = 7 0.575132 0.645779 MIN: 0.52 MIN: 0.55 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 46.3 284.4 490.7 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.2 238.2 377.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.7 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.1169 0.2338 0.3507 0.4676 0.5845 SE +/- 0.000770, N = 7 SE +/- 0.001949, N = 7 0.277574 0.519451 MIN: 0.23 MIN: 0.46 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.8 272.8 508.7 Xeon Platinum 8490H 83.7 250.2 377.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.7 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.0899 0.1798 0.2697 0.3596 0.4495 SE +/- 0.001109, N = 7 SE +/- 0.002592, N = 15 0.399543 0.281812 MIN: 0.35 MIN: 0.25 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.4 283.4 516.2 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.1 241.3 372.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 237.45 279.46
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org ms/batch, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Synchronous Single-Stream EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 0.947 1.894 2.841 3.788 4.735 SE +/- 0.0065, N = 3 SE +/- 0.0063, N = 3 4.2091 3.5734
Neural Magic DeepSparse CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.7 265.4 306.7 Xeon Platinum 8490H 84.1 284.0 325.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Classification, ResNet-50 ImageNet - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 925.89 769.78
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Token Classification, BERT base uncased conll2003 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 40.35 47.45
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Question Answering, BERT base uncased SQuaD 12layer Pruned90 - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 399.49 192.99
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: CV Detection,YOLOv5s COCO - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 432.67 318.93
Neural Magic DeepSparse Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream OpenBenchmarking.org items/sec, More Is Better Neural Magic DeepSparse 1.1 Model: NLP Document Classification, oBERT base uncased on IMDB - Scenario: Asynchronous Multi-Stream EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 40.44 47.29
OpenRadioss Model: Cell Phone Drop Test OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: Cell Phone Drop Test EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 20.45 32.38
OpenRadioss CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.6 392.2 547.4 Xeon Platinum 8490H 82.2 293.1 374.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 140 280 420 560 700
OpenRadioss Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 114.47 152.91
OpenRadioss CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 9374F 2P 45.7 457.5 506.4 Xeon Platinum 8490H 84.1 334.1 375.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenRadioss 2022.10.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 130 260 390 520 650
Geometric Mean Of All Test Results Result Composite - Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H Linux Benchmarks OpenBenchmarking.org Geometric Mean, More Is Better Geometric Mean Of All Test Results Result Composite - Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H Linux Benchmarks EPYC 9374F 2P Xeon Platinum 8490H 20 40 60 80 100 93.62 70.94
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4