Zink Mesa 22.3-devel

Zink vs. RadeonSI benchmarks on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS with Radeon RX 6800 XT on Mesa 22.3-devel. Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2208223-PTS-ZINKMESA44
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results
Show Result Confidence Charts

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Desktop Graphics 2 Tests
Steam 8 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
RadeonSI
August 21 2022
  2 Hours, 13 Minutes
Zink
August 21 2022
  2 Hours, 30 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  2 Hours, 22 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Zink

Processor: Intel Core i9-12900K @ 5.20GHz (16 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (1601 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake-S PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 + 2000GB, Graphics: zink 16GB (2575/1000MHz), Audio: Intel Alder Lake-S HD Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411

OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.18.0-051800-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.3.0-devel (git-1d521a5 2022-08-20 jammy-oibaf-ppa), Vulkan: 1.3.224, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Environment Notes: MESA_LOADER_DRIVER_OVERRIDE=zink
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x1f - Thermald 2.4.9
Vbios Version Notes: 113-D4120500-101
Python Notes: Python 3.10.4
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

RadeonSI

Processor: Intel Core i9-12900K @ 5.20GHz (16 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (1601 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake-S PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 + 2000GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB (2575/1000MHz), Audio: Intel Alder Lake-S HD Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411

OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.18.0-051800-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.3.0-devel (git-1d521a5 2022-08-20 jammy-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 14.0.6 DRM 3.46), Vulkan: 1.3.224, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x1f - Thermald 2.4.9
Graphics Notes: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 16368 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-D4120500-101
Python Notes: Python 3.10.4
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Zink Mesa 22.3-develOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i9-12900K @ 5.20GHz (16 Cores / 24 Threads)ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (1601 BIOS)Intel Alder Lake-S PCH32GB1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 + 2000GBzink 16GB (2575/1000MHz)AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB (2575/1000MHz)Intel Alder Lake-S HD AudioASUS VP28UIntel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411Ubuntu 22.045.18.0-051800-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 42.2X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland4.6 Mesa 22.3.0-devel (git-1d521a5 2022-08-20 jammy-oibaf-ppa)4.6 Mesa 22.3.0-devel (git-1d521a5 2022-08-20 jammy-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 14.0.6 DRM 3.46)1.3.224GCC 11.2.0ext43840x2160ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerOpenGLsVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionZink Mesa 22.3-devel BenchmarksSystem Logs- Transparent Huge Pages: madvise- Zink: MESA_LOADER_DRIVER_OVERRIDE=zink- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x1f - Thermald 2.4.9 - Zink: 113-D4120500-101- Python 3.10.4- itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected - RadeonSI: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 16368 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-D4120500-101

Zink vs. RadeonSI ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+16.4%+16.4%+32.8%+32.8%+49.2%+49.2%+65.6%+65.6%65.7%49.5%46%35.2%35.1%35%25.2%24.9%24.5%21.6%19.7%16.5%14.3%14.2%14.1%12.4%11.4%10.6%8.5%7.6%5.2%4.5%4.2%3.7%3%3%2.3%2.3%2.2%3840 x 21603840 x 2160 - Ultra - OpenGL3840 x 21601920 x 10802560 x 1440 - Ultra - OpenGL2560 x 14401920 x 1080 - OpenGL2560 x 1440 - OpenGL1920 x 1080 - OpenGL2560 x 1440 - OpenGL3840 x 2160 - OpenGL3840 x 2160 - OpenGL17%3840 x 21601920 x 1080 - Ultra - OpenGL3840 x 2160 - Normal3840 x 2160 - Ultra3840 x 2160 - OpenGL13.8%Pixmark Piano - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen2560 x 1440 - OpenGL11.8%2560 x 1440GiMark - 3840 x 2160 - FullscreenFurmark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen2560 x 1440 - Ultra1920 x 1080 - Ultra3840 x 2160 - High4.9%Pixmark Volplosion - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen2560 x 1440 - Normal1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - Normal1920 x 1080 - OpenGL2560 x 1440 - Ultra2.9%3840 x 2160 - Medium2.4%2560 x 14401920 x 1080 - Low1920 x 1080Metro: Last Light ReduxDawn of War IIITesseractHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastDawn of War IIIHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoLeft 4 Dead 2Left 4 Dead 2Half-Life 2: Episode TwoLeft 4 Dead 2Portal 2Half-Life 2 - Lost CoastDawn of War IIITomb RaiderTomb RaiderHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoGpuTestPortal 2TesseractGpuTestGpuTestTomb RaiderTomb RaiderUnvanquishedGpuTestTomb RaiderTesseractTomb RaiderPortal 2UnvanquishedUnvanquishedET: LegacyXonoticET: LegacyZinkRadeonSI

Zink Mesa 22.3-develmetroll-redux: 3840 x 2160dow3: 3840 x 2160 - Ultra - OpenGLtesseract: 3840 x 2160hl2lostcoast: 1920 x 1080dow3: 2560 x 1440 - Ultra - OpenGLhl2lostcoast: 2560 x 1440hl2-ep2: 1920 x 1080 - OpenGLl4d2: 2560 x 1440 - OpenGLl4d2: 1920 x 1080 - OpenGLhl2-ep2: 2560 x 1440 - OpenGLl4d2: 3840 x 2160 - OpenGLportal2: 3840 x 2160 - OpenGLhl2lostcoast: 3840 x 2160dow3: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra - OpenGLtomb-raider: 3840 x 2160 - Normaltomb-raider: 3840 x 2160 - Ultrahl2-ep2: 3840 x 2160 - OpenGLgputest: Pixmark Piano - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreenportal2: 2560 x 1440 - OpenGLtesseract: 2560 x 1440gputest: GiMark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreentomb-raider: 2560 x 1440 - Ultratomb-raider: 1920 x 1080 - Ultraunvanquished: 3840 x 2160 - Highgputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreentomb-raider: 2560 x 1440 - Normaltesseract: 1920 x 1080tomb-raider: 1920 x 1080 - Normalportal2: 1920 x 1080 - OpenGLunvanquished: 2560 x 1440 - Ultraunvanquished: 3840 x 2160 - Mediumetlegacy: 2560 x 1440xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Lowetlegacy: 1920 x 1080xonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Lowetlegacy: 3840 x 2160xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimateunvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - Ultraxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Lowxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultraxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Hightf2: 3840 x 2160xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Highxonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Ultimatexonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimateunvanquished: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraunvanquished: 2560 x 1440 - Mediumxonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Ultragputest: TessMark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreenxonotic: 2560 x 1440 - Highwarsow: 1920 x 1080unvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - Mediumunvanquished: 2560 x 1440 - Highxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraunvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - Hightf2: 1920 x 1080ZinkRadeonSI104.2368.613729608.8665738.29123.157557734.65742.51375.82376.57738.41367.17484.40691.62150.266403266.7136.2626.151635742.01891.9463173848352298.5319.4613.24177340.5957.4944336.7785.42614.6620.2732.3760.4306325732.0765.4159105732.2471.9795093615.2758.6099202603.6777783639.9216624268.02637.9691490474.2225752475.4387723610.5625.2605.546981830446640.4341060960.5624.3616.5600.4679848619.9270.94172.70102.589948888.9550998.18166.431193991.91929.74469.28468.67898.09439.54414.10806.03171.816712304.7155.4550.231837663.73993.4279192269058321.2336.0584.34366354.9992.8456346.9808.73597.4605.5749.5777.7407522748.0780.2265370746.2464.2382675606.5769.2926961612.1335714648.4794072264.69631.3769705469.9576187479.5236442605.5620.3600.801435030611637.6719946964.5621.9617.7599.5439432619.3271.03OpenBenchmarking.org

Metro: Last Light Redux

A Steam-based test of the Metro: Last Light Redux game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterMetro: Last Light ReduxResolution: 3840 x 2160ZinkRadeonSI4080120160200SE +/- 0.34, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3104.23172.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterMetro: Last Light ReduxResolution: 3840 x 2160ZinkRadeonSI0.26010.52020.78031.04041.30051.0021.156
MinAvgMaxZink0.019.030.9RadeonSI0.226.445.5OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterMetro: Last Light ReduxCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor1224364860
MinAvgMaxZink6.0104.0226.0RadeonSI6.0149.3257.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterMetro: Last Light ReduxGPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 19799 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 27430 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink60.066.071.0RadeonSI66.072.979.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterMetro: Last Light ReduxGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink26.068.390.0RadeonSI1.071.699.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterMetro: Last Light ReduxGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Dawn of War III

Dawn of War III Mad Max on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDawn of War IIIResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI20406080100SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 368.61102.59MIN: 49.46 / MAX: 118.17MIN: 86.57 / MAX: 146.85
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDawn of War IIIResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI0.16520.33040.49560.66080.8260.5430.734
MinAvgMaxZink0.07.613.5RadeonSI0.19.519.4OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIICPU Usage (Summary) Monitor612182430
MinAvgMaxZink6.0126.4256.0RadeonSI6.0139.8255.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 11252 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 12299 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.060.871.0RadeonSI53.063.372.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink2.078.799.0RadeonSI1.077.899.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160ZinkRadeonSI2004006008001000SE +/- 6.18, N = 3SE +/- 3.84, N = 3608.87888.96
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160ZinkRadeonSI0.92991.85982.78973.71964.64952.8754.133
MinAvgMaxZink0.02.54.5RadeonSI0.33.25.9OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor2.174.346.518.6810.85
MinAvgMaxZink6.0211.8256.0RadeonSI6.0215.1255.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 7625 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 7672 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink64.071.975.0RadeonSI62.071.374.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.092.699.0RadeonSI1.092.599.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Half-Life 2 - Lost Coast

This is a benchmark of Valve's Half-Life 2: Lost Coast game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account and have Steam installed for the system. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastResolution: 1920 x 1080ZinkRadeonSI2004006008001000SE +/- 5.70, N = 10SE +/- 4.05, N = 5738.29998.18
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastResolution: 1920 x 1080ZinkRadeonSI71421283529.8932.09
MinAvgMaxZink0.02.48.4RadeonSI0.22.916.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor510152025
MinAvgMaxZink6.024.7139.0RadeonSI6.031.1164.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastGPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 410 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 454 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.054.161.0RadeonSI54.057.562.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.046.588.0RadeonSI1.027.575.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Dawn of War III

Dawn of War III Mad Max on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDawn of War IIIResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI4080120160200SE +/- 0.68, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3123.16166.43MIN: 76.31 / MAX: 278.44MIN: 115.77 / MAX: 319.68
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDawn of War IIIResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI0.32760.65520.98281.31041.6381.1571.456
MinAvgMaxZink0.010.219.5RadeonSI0.211.923.5OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIICPU Usage (Summary) Monitor816243240
MinAvgMaxZink6.0106.4256.0RadeonSI6.0114.3256.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 9473 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 10057 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink36.052.465.0RadeonSI51.059.569.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.079.599.0RadeonSI1.063.099.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Half-Life 2 - Lost Coast

This is a benchmark of Valve's Half-Life 2: Lost Coast game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account and have Steam installed for the system. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastResolution: 2560 x 1440ZinkRadeonSI2004006008001000SE +/- 2.68, N = 4SE +/- 3.04, N = 5734.65991.91
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastResolution: 2560 x 1440ZinkRadeonSI61218243022.0626.45
MinAvgMaxZink0.02.38.5RadeonSI0.22.614.3OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor510152025
MinAvgMaxZink6.033.3199.0RadeonSI6.037.5227.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastGPU Power Consumption Monitor601201802403001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 575 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 548 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.052.056.0RadeonSI51.052.056.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastGPU Temperature Monitor1632486480
MinAvgMaxZink1.048.381.0RadeonSI1.031.491.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Half-Life 2: Episode Two

This is a benchmark of Valve's Half-Life 2: Episode 2 game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account and have Steam installed for the system. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI2004006008001000SE +/- 6.09, N = 3SE +/- 2.94, N = 3742.51929.74
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI36912159.65512.173
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.59.2RadeonSI0.25.520.7OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor612182430
MinAvgMaxZink6.076.9255.0RadeonSI6.076.4227.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoGPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 3589 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 3055 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.054.961.0RadeonSI50.055.261.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.062.599.0RadeonSI1.061.198.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Left 4 Dead 2

This is a benchmark of Valve's Left 4 Dead 2 game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account and have Steam installed for the system. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI100200300400500SE +/- 0.51, N = 3SE +/- 0.80, N = 3375.82469.28
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI2468108.8238.648
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.610.1RadeonSI0.25.927.8OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor918273645
MinAvgMaxZink6.042.6167.0RadeonSI6.054.3174.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 1647 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 1646 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.054.359.0RadeonSI52.054.258.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2GPU Temperature Monitor1632486480
MinAvgMaxZink1.042.288.0RadeonSI2.049.592.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI100200300400500SE +/- 2.84, N = 10SE +/- 1.02, N = 3376.57468.67
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI369121510.8611.48
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.710.1RadeonSI0.26.129.9OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor918273645
MinAvgMaxZink6.034.7117.0RadeonSI6.040.8124.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2GPU Power Consumption Monitor40801201602001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 1304 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 1279 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink50.054.158.0RadeonSI50.052.656.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2GPU Temperature Monitor1632486480
MinAvgMaxZink1.042.889.0RadeonSI1.042.181.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Half-Life 2: Episode Two

This is a benchmark of Valve's Half-Life 2: Episode 2 game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account and have Steam installed for the system. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI2004006008001000SE +/- 3.14, N = 3SE +/- 1.59, N = 3738.41898.09
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI2468107.3808.851
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.49.4RadeonSI0.25.414.5OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor510152025
MinAvgMaxZink6.0100.1256.0RadeonSI6.0101.5255.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoGPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 4603 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 4059 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink50.057.065.0RadeonSI50.057.065.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.066.399.0RadeonSI1.075.199.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Left 4 Dead 2

This is a benchmark of Valve's Left 4 Dead 2 game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account and have Steam installed for the system. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI100200300400500SE +/- 1.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3367.17439.54
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI1.22512.45023.67534.90046.12555.4455.146
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.510.0RadeonSI0.25.629.6OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor918273645
MinAvgMaxZink6.067.4255.0RadeonSI6.085.4257.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 2630 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 2676 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.054.260.0RadeonSI50.054.561.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.052.299.0RadeonSI1.061.899.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterLeft 4 Dead 2GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Portal 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterPortal 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI100200300400500SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.68, N = 3484.40414.10
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterPortal 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI1.34082.68164.02245.36326.7045.9594.166
MinAvgMaxZink0.02.56.4RadeonSI0.12.49.1OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterPortal 2CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor4.428.8413.2617.6822.1
MinAvgMaxZink6.081.3255.0RadeonSI6.099.4257.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterPortal 2GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 3333 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 3711 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink50.054.862.0RadeonSI52.058.266.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterPortal 2GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink2.083.899.0RadeonSI1.069.299.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterPortal 2GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Half-Life 2 - Lost Coast

This is a benchmark of Valve's Half-Life 2: Lost Coast game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account and have Steam installed for the system. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastResolution: 3840 x 2160ZinkRadeonSI2004006008001000SE +/- 1.29, N = 4SE +/- 3.51, N = 5691.62806.03
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastResolution: 3840 x 2160ZinkRadeonSI4812162015.1316.02
MinAvgMaxZink0.02.18.6RadeonSI0.23.320.7OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor612182430
MinAvgMaxZink6.045.7256.0RadeonSI6.050.3256.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastGPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 812 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 755 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink50.051.657.0RadeonSI50.052.157.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastGPU Temperature Monitor1632486480
MinAvgMaxZink1.053.299.0RadeonSI1.040.499.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2 - Lost CoastGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Dawn of War III

Dawn of War III Mad Max on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDawn of War IIIResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI4080120160200SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3150.27171.82MIN: 97.83 / MAX: 337.65MIN: 118.88 / MAX: 458
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDawn of War IIIResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI0.561.121.682.242.81.6262.489
MinAvgMaxZink0.212.124.8RadeonSI0.312.022.6OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIICPU Usage (Summary) Monitor816243240
MinAvgMaxZink6.092.4249.0RadeonSI6.069.0255.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 8161 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 6051 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink57.062.267.0RadeonSI52.056.362.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.066.999.0RadeonSI1.055.799.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Tomb Raider

This is a benchmark of the Tomb Raider (2013) game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own Tomb Raider. This automates the process of executing the game and using the built-in benchmark functionality. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Quality: NormalZinkRadeonSI70140210280350SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3266.7304.7MIN: 192 / MAX: 319.4MIN: 198 / MAX: 377.2
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Quality: NormalZinkRadeonSI0.32990.65980.98971.31961.64951.3021.466
MinAvgMaxZink0.08.812.8RadeonSI0.39.713.5OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor48121620
MinAvgMaxZink6.0204.8257.0RadeonSI6.0207.8257.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 16861 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 16831 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink63.072.677.0RadeonSI63.072.676.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.087.799.0RadeonSI1.085.799.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI306090120150SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3136.2155.4MIN: 116.6 / MAX: 153.4MIN: 133.5 / MAX: 175.6
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI0.16830.33660.50490.67320.84150.6670.748
MinAvgMaxZink0.06.913.9RadeonSI0.27.620.8OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor612182430
MinAvgMaxZink6.0204.1255.0RadeonSI6.0207.9256.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 16938 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 16839 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink60.072.277.0RadeonSI60.072.377.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.090.699.0RadeonSI1.087.199.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Half-Life 2: Episode Two

This is a benchmark of Valve's Half-Life 2: Episode 2 game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account and have Steam installed for the system. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI140280420560700SE +/- 1.37, N = 3SE +/- 1.33, N = 3626.15550.23
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoResolution: 3840 x 2160 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI1.11082.22163.33244.44325.5544.9373.902
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.28.7RadeonSI0.14.419.4OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor612182430
MinAvgMaxZink6.0126.8257.0RadeonSI6.0141.0256.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoGPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 6256 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 7050 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink52.061.371.0RadeonSI53.062.873.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.083.599.0RadeonSI2.086.299.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterHalf-Life 2: Episode TwoGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenZinkRadeonSI400800120016002000SE +/- 2.85, N = 3SE +/- 3.00, N = 316351837
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints Per Watt, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenZinkRadeonSI2468107.1197.933
MinAvgMaxZink0.00.21.8RadeonSI0.10.51.7OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor0.82551.6512.47653.3024.1275
MinAvgMaxZink6.0229.7256.0RadeonSI6.0231.6255.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 16306 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 16441 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink62.070.677.0RadeonSI61.070.177.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.098.299.0RadeonSI1.095.899.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Portal 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterPortal 2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI160320480640800SE +/- 0.52, N = 3SE +/- 1.79, N = 3742.01663.73
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterPortal 2Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI369121511.5799.543
MinAvgMaxZink0.02.78.9RadeonSI0.23.114.6OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterPortal 2CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor510152025
MinAvgMaxZink6.064.1258.0RadeonSI6.069.6254.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterPortal 2GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 2392 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 2272 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink50.053.159.0RadeonSI55.057.863.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterPortal 2GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.058.399.0RadeonSI1.063.899.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterPortal 2GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1440ZinkRadeonSI2004006008001000SE +/- 9.37, N = 5SE +/- 0.97, N = 3891.95993.43
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 2560 x 1440ZinkRadeonSI1.152.33.454.65.755.1115.085
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.76.2RadeonSI0.24.26.6OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.0174.5255.0RadeonSI6.0195.4256.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 6283 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 6903 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink58.069.675.0RadeonSI57.068.574.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.084.999.0RadeonSI3.071.899.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenZinkRadeonSI4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 24.50, N = 3SE +/- 7.31, N = 31738419226
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints Per Watt, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenZinkRadeonSI2040608010087.0585.47
MinAvgMaxZink0.00.20.4RadeonSI0.10.51.9OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor1.042.083.124.165.2
MinAvgMaxZink6.0199.7234.0RadeonSI6.0224.9256.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 14445 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 16345 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink65.073.476.0RadeonSI63.074.878.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink97.098.499.0RadeonSI99.099.099.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenZinkRadeonSI2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 11.62, N = 3SE +/- 26.09, N = 383529058
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints Per Watt, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenZinkRadeonSI91827364536.3539.16
MinAvgMaxZink0.00.21.0RadeonSI0.10.53.9OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor1.10252.2053.30754.415.5125
MinAvgMaxZink6.0229.8256.0RadeonSI6.0231.3255.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 16389 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 16347 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink65.075.578.0RadeonSI66.075.878.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.098.399.0RadeonSI97.098.899.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Tomb Raider

This is a benchmark of the Tomb Raider (2013) game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own Tomb Raider. This automates the process of executing the game and using the built-in benchmark functionality. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI70140210280350SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.49, N = 3298.5321.2MIN: 171 / MAX: 357.3MIN: 170 / MAX: 394
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI0.36410.72821.09231.45641.82051.5001.618
MinAvgMaxZink0.09.613.0RadeonSI0.210.320.8OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor612182430
MinAvgMaxZink6.0199.0256.0RadeonSI6.0198.5256.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 16385 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 16209 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink60.070.876.0RadeonSI60.070.976.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.084.299.0RadeonSI1.084.899.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI70140210280350SE +/- 1.10, N = 3SE +/- 1.15, N = 3319.4336.0MIN: 167.3 / MAX: 386.5MIN: 174.6 / MAX: 422
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI0.52761.05521.58282.11042.6382.2342.345
MinAvgMaxZink0.09.914.0RadeonSI0.310.414.5OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor510152025
MinAvgMaxZink6.0143.0224.0RadeonSI6.0143.3224.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor601201802403001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 11868 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 11655 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink50.062.272.0RadeonSI53.063.872.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.072.097.0RadeonSI1.067.287.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Unvanquished

Unvanquished is a modern fork of the Tremulous first person shooter. Unvanquished is powered by the Daemon engine, a combination of the ioquake3 (id Tech 3) engine with the graphically-beautiful XreaL engine. Unvanquished supports a modern OpenGL 3 renderer and other advanced graphics features for this open-source, cross-platform shooter game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighZinkRadeonSI130260390520650SE +/- 3.12, N = 3SE +/- 5.97, N = 3613.2584.3
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighZinkRadeonSI36912159.2239.736
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.75.2RadeonSI0.24.37.9OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.066.5182.0RadeonSI6.060.0168.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 1418 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 1300 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.054.157.0RadeonSI51.054.457.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Temperature Monitor1632486480
MinAvgMaxZink1.049.685.0RadeonSI1.052.780.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenZinkRadeonSI9001800270036004500SE +/- 13.84, N = 3SE +/- 2.40, N = 341774366
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints Per Watt, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenZinkRadeonSI51015202519.1118.94
MinAvgMaxZink0.00.21.1RadeonSI0.00.41.2OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor0.49570.99141.48711.98282.4785
MinAvgMaxZink6.0218.5247.0RadeonSI6.0230.6255.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 15589 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 16369 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink57.068.671.0RadeonSI57.067.971.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.096.899.0RadeonSI3.097.899.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Tomb Raider

This is a benchmark of the Tomb Raider (2013) game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own Tomb Raider. This automates the process of executing the game and using the built-in benchmark functionality. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Quality: NormalZinkRadeonSI80160240320400SE +/- 0.68, N = 3SE +/- 1.53, N = 3340.5354.9MIN: 197.2 / MAX: 417.2MIN: 185.6 / MAX: 443.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 2560 x 1440 - Quality: NormalZinkRadeonSI0.56751.1351.70252.272.83752.2172.522
MinAvgMaxZink0.09.913.1RadeonSI0.110.317.7OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor510152025
MinAvgMaxZink6.0153.6255.0RadeonSI6.0140.7235.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 12594 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 11401 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink59.069.377.0RadeonSI57.068.476.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.067.991.0RadeonSI1.064.288.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080ZinkRadeonSI2004006008001000SE +/- 6.30, N = 3SE +/- 1.07, N = 3957.49992.85
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080ZinkRadeonSI36912156.9149.088
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.15.6RadeonSI0.24.25.9OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor2.164.326.488.6410.8
MinAvgMaxZink6.0138.5232.0RadeonSI6.0109.2254.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 5031 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 3860 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink53.060.666.0RadeonSI56.060.664.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink2.078.792.0RadeonSI5.065.998.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Tomb Raider

This is a benchmark of the Tomb Raider (2013) game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own Tomb Raider. This automates the process of executing the game and using the built-in benchmark functionality. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: NormalZinkRadeonSI80160240320400SE +/- 1.09, N = 3SE +/- 1.69, N = 3336.7346.9MIN: 188.5 / MAX: 418MIN: 197.6 / MAX: 439.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: NormalZinkRadeonSI0.94371.88742.83113.77484.71853.7244.194
MinAvgMaxZink0.09.912.9RadeonSI0.210.414.5OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor510152025
MinAvgMaxZink6.090.4132.0RadeonSI6.082.7119.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor40801201602001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 7445 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 6727 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink62.065.368.0RadeonSI61.063.966.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.062.991.0RadeonSI1.061.988.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTomb RaiderGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Portal 2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterPortal 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI2004006008001000SE +/- 7.88, N = 12SE +/- 1.00, N = 3785.42808.73
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterPortal 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLZinkRadeonSI4812162014.3514.69
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.09.5RadeonSI0.23.318.8OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterPortal 2CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor612182430
MinAvgMaxZink6.054.7255.0RadeonSI6.055.0232.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterPortal 2GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 1843 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 1743 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.055.665.0RadeonSI60.063.668.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterPortal 2GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.060.499.0RadeonSI1.057.699.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterPortal 2GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Unvanquished

Unvanquished is a modern fork of the Tremulous first person shooter. Unvanquished is powered by the Daemon engine, a combination of the ioquake3 (id Tech 3) engine with the graphically-beautiful XreaL engine. Unvanquished supports a modern OpenGL 3 renderer and other advanced graphics features for this open-source, cross-platform shooter game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI130260390520650SE +/- 2.19, N = 3SE +/- 3.44, N = 3614.6597.4
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI369121512.6612.60
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.85.2RadeonSI0.24.38.3OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.048.6138.0RadeonSI6.047.4106.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Power Consumption Monitor40801201602001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 1133 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 1011 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink53.055.358.0RadeonSI53.055.958.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Temperature Monitor1632486480
MinAvgMaxZink1.050.576.0RadeonSI1.052.682.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: MediumZinkRadeonSI130260390520650SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 3.29, N = 4620.2605.5
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: MediumZinkRadeonSI369121511.5111.41
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.75.1RadeonSI0.34.16.3OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.053.9148.0RadeonSI6.053.1141.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Power Consumption Monitor40801201602001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 1132 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 1102 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink52.055.157.0RadeonSI54.056.259.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Temperature Monitor1632486480
MinAvgMaxZink1.054.884.0RadeonSI1.049.482.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

ET: Legacy

ETLegacy is an open-source engine evolution of Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory, a World War II era first person shooter that was released for free by Splash Damage using the id Tech 3 engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78Resolution: 2560 x 1440ZinkRadeonSI160320480640800SE +/- 2.79, N = 4SE +/- 1.58, N = 4732.3749.5
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78Resolution: 2560 x 1440ZinkRadeonSI51015202519.9220.18
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.65.9RadeonSI0.33.66.2OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.036.879.0RadeonSI6.037.178.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78GPU Power Consumption Monitor204060801001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 598 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 622 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.052.455.0RadeonSI51.053.155.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78GPU Temperature Monitor1530456075
MinAvgMaxZink1.048.885.0RadeonSI1.046.983.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowZinkRadeonSI2004006008001000SE +/- 0.43, N = 3SE +/- 0.78, N = 3760.43777.74MIN: 524 / MAX: 1396MIN: 526 / MAX: 1440
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowZinkRadeonSI51015202517.5918.81
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.45.3RadeonSI0.24.46.1OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.043.256.0RadeonSI6.041.452.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Power Consumption Monitor16324864801. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 2234 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 2095 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink57.062.068.0RadeonSI55.058.965.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.034.561.0RadeonSI1.022.140.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

ET: Legacy

ETLegacy is an open-source engine evolution of Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory, a World War II era first person shooter that was released for free by Splash Damage using the id Tech 3 engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78Resolution: 1920 x 1080ZinkRadeonSI160320480640800SE +/- 2.47, N = 4SE +/- 1.38, N = 4732.0748.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78Resolution: 1920 x 1080ZinkRadeonSI51015202521.9422.46
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.76.2RadeonSI0.33.76.1OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.033.464.0RadeonSI6.033.364.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78GPU Power Consumption Monitor204060801001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 534 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 550 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink56.058.161.0RadeonSI54.056.559.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.044.381.0RadeonSI1.046.080.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: LowZinkRadeonSI2004006008001000SE +/- 2.09, N = 3SE +/- 2.17, N = 3765.42780.23MIN: 515 / MAX: 1399MIN: 513 / MAX: 1425
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: LowZinkRadeonSI51015202517.2718.32
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.46.6RadeonSI0.34.56.1OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.044.360.0RadeonSI6.042.662.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Power Consumption Monitor204060801001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 2290 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 2158 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.053.855.0RadeonSI51.053.757.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Temperature Monitor1632486480
MinAvgMaxZink1.042.975.0RadeonSI1.030.966.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

ET: Legacy

ETLegacy is an open-source engine evolution of Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory, a World War II era first person shooter that was released for free by Splash Damage using the id Tech 3 engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78Resolution: 3840 x 2160ZinkRadeonSI160320480640800SE +/- 1.99, N = 4SE +/- 2.28, N = 4732.2746.2
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78Resolution: 3840 x 2160ZinkRadeonSI4812162013.0114.45
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.86.5RadeonSI0.33.76.2OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.056.3166.0RadeonSI6.051.6159.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78GPU Power Consumption Monitor501001502002501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 957 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 917 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.054.558.0RadeonSI53.055.860.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78GPU Temperature Monitor1632486480
MinAvgMaxZink1.049.985.0RadeonSI1.040.085.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.78GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateZinkRadeonSI100200300400500SE +/- 1.49, N = 3SE +/- 4.43, N = 3471.98464.24MIN: 94 / MAX: 928MIN: 96 / MAX: 971
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateZinkRadeonSI0.76521.53042.29563.06083.8263.2233.401
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.55.4RadeonSI0.14.67.3OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.0146.4255.0RadeonSI6.0136.5255.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 11276 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 10603 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink53.064.172.0RadeonSI52.062.070.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink2.070.699.0RadeonSI1.065.397.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Unvanquished

Unvanquished is a modern fork of the Tremulous first person shooter. Unvanquished is powered by the Daemon engine, a combination of the ioquake3 (id Tech 3) engine with the graphically-beautiful XreaL engine. Unvanquished supports a modern OpenGL 3 renderer and other advanced graphics features for this open-source, cross-platform shooter game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI130260390520650SE +/- 0.64, N = 3SE +/- 1.44, N = 3615.2606.5
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI4812162015.7915.36
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.85.3RadeonSI0.34.17.4OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.039.086.0RadeonSI6.039.577.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Power Consumption Monitor204060801001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 896 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 842 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.053.456.0RadeonSI51.053.155.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Temperature Monitor1632486480
MinAvgMaxZink2.057.282.0RadeonSI1.048.682.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: LowZinkRadeonSI170340510680850SE +/- 1.81, N = 3SE +/- 1.01, N = 3758.61769.29MIN: 481 / MAX: 1351MIN: 460 / MAX: 1382
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: LowZinkRadeonSI4812162013.8614.65
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.45.1RadeonSI0.34.56.1OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.054.790.0RadeonSI6.052.575.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Power Consumption Monitor204060801001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 2846 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 2713 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink53.058.863.0RadeonSI55.059.563.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.059.992.0RadeonSI1.048.677.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI130260390520650SE +/- 0.59, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3603.68612.13MIN: 403 / MAX: 1002MIN: 396 / MAX: 1010
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI369121510.5110.90
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.55.5RadeonSI0.34.77.6OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.057.491.0RadeonSI6.056.172.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Power Consumption Monitor204060801001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 3560 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 3444 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink55.057.561.0RadeonSI53.055.357.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink2.065.086.0RadeonSI1.060.783.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighZinkRadeonSI140280420560700SE +/- 1.58, N = 3SE +/- 1.01, N = 3639.92648.48MIN: 440 / MAX: 1145MIN: 419 / MAX: 1182
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighZinkRadeonSI369121511.6511.80
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.55.3RadeonSI0.34.67.5OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.055.077.0RadeonSI6.054.973.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Power Consumption Monitor204060801001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 3242 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 3205 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink53.055.758.0RadeonSI56.060.365.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.064.784.0RadeonSI1.061.580.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Team Fortress 2

This is a benchmark of Valve's free-to-play Team Fortress 2 game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that Team Fortress 2 is already installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160ZinkRadeonSI60120180240300SE +/- 0.94, N = 3SE +/- 2.27, N = 3268.02264.69
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 3840 x 2160ZinkRadeonSI369121510.4989.200
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.37.9RadeonSI0.23.911.2OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTeam Fortress 2CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor48121620
MinAvgMaxZink6.025.5119.0RadeonSI6.028.8133.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTeam Fortress 2GPU Power Consumption Monitor40801201602001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 817 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 873 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink50.050.953.0RadeonSI52.053.256.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTeam Fortress 2GPU Temperature Monitor1632486480
MinAvgMaxZink1.044.388.0RadeonSI1.048.993.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTeam Fortress 2GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighZinkRadeonSI140280420560700SE +/- 0.96, N = 3SE +/- 4.84, N = 3637.97631.38MIN: 431 / MAX: 1054MIN: 408 / MAX: 1162
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighZinkRadeonSI1.27462.54923.82385.09846.3734.6435.665
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.58.2RadeonSI0.34.56.8OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.0137.4255.0RadeonSI6.0111.4204.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 8199 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 6687 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink54.062.370.0RadeonSI51.058.964.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.067.399.0RadeonSI2.064.584.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: UltimateZinkRadeonSI100200300400500SE +/- 1.10, N = 3SE +/- 2.05, N = 3474.22469.96MIN: 88 / MAX: 936MIN: 100 / MAX: 993
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: UltimateZinkRadeonSI2468106.1876.525
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.55.3RadeonSI0.24.56.4OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.076.6122.0RadeonSI6.072.0125.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Power Consumption Monitor40801201602001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 5799 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 5522 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.057.060.0RadeonSI51.055.758.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Temperature Monitor1632486480
MinAvgMaxZink1.063.690.0RadeonSI1.063.386.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateZinkRadeonSI100200300400500SE +/- 1.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 3475.44479.52MIN: 103 / MAX: 940MIN: 93 / MAX: 964
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateZinkRadeonSI2468108.0618.263
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.55.4RadeonSI0.24.66.5OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.059.091.0RadeonSI6.058.083.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Power Consumption Monitor204060801001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 4483 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 4353 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink54.057.762.0RadeonSI54.056.660.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.059.892.0RadeonSI1.060.886.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Unvanquished

Unvanquished is a modern fork of the Tremulous first person shooter. Unvanquished is powered by the Daemon engine, a combination of the ioquake3 (id Tech 3) engine with the graphically-beautiful XreaL engine. Unvanquished supports a modern OpenGL 3 renderer and other advanced graphics features for this open-source, cross-platform shooter game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI130260390520650SE +/- 2.15, N = 3SE +/- 3.06, N = 3610.5605.5
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI2468106.2796.645
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.85.3RadeonSI0.24.27.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.097.2244.0RadeonSI6.091.1254.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 2236 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 1944 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.055.260.0RadeonSI53.056.761.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.062.099.0RadeonSI1.054.990.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: MediumZinkRadeonSI130260390520650SE +/- 2.22, N = 3SE +/- 1.32, N = 4625.2620.3
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: MediumZinkRadeonSI4812162016.7816.37
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.75.6RadeonSI0.24.16.4OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.037.376.0RadeonSI6.037.970.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Power Consumption Monitor204060801001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 795 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 767 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.053.155.0RadeonSI52.053.856.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Temperature Monitor1632486480
MinAvgMaxZink1.054.082.0RadeonSI1.049.077.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI130260390520650SE +/- 0.92, N = 3SE +/- 2.82, N = 3605.55600.80MIN: 404 / MAX: 1002MIN: 394 / MAX: 1050
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI2468108.1158.591
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.55.4RadeonSI0.24.68.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.074.6117.0RadeonSI6.069.9106.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Power Consumption Monitor40801201602001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 4602 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 4336 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.055.157.0RadeonSI51.057.561.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.065.888.0RadeonSI1.065.587.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenZinkRadeonSI7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 2.40, N = 3SE +/- 3.53, N = 33044630611
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints Per Watt, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenZinkRadeonSI306090120150131.72133.56
MinAvgMaxZink0.00.31.6RadeonSI0.10.53.8OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor1.07722.15443.23164.30885.386
MinAvgMaxZink6.0231.1256.0RadeonSI6.0229.2256.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 16334 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 16350 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink66.075.378.0RadeonSI66.075.278.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.098.599.0RadeonSI2.096.799.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: HighZinkRadeonSI140280420560700SE +/- 1.20, N = 3SE +/- 1.89, N = 3640.43637.67MIN: 443 / MAX: 1129MIN: 416 / MAX: 1174
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: HighZinkRadeonSI36912159.0329.877
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.55.3RadeonSI0.24.57.8OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.070.9102.0RadeonSI6.064.689.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Power Consumption Monitor204060801001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 4183 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 3831 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.057.662.0RadeonSI52.054.756.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.064.488.0RadeonSI1.060.782.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Warsow

This is a benchmark of Warsow, a popular open-source first-person shooter. This game uses the QFusion engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterWarsow 2.5 BetaResolution: 1920 x 1080ZinkRadeonSI2004006008001000SE +/- 3.30, N = 3SE +/- 0.85, N = 3960.5964.5
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterWarsow 2.5 BetaResolution: 1920 x 1080ZinkRadeonSI369121511.6412.75
MinAvgMaxZink0.05.19.8RadeonSI0.25.110.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterWarsow 2.5 BetaCPU Usage (Summary) Monitor4.428.8413.2617.6822.1
MinAvgMaxZink6.082.5157.0RadeonSI6.075.7102.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterWarsow 2.5 BetaGPU Power Consumption Monitor40801201602001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 7013 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 6406 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.057.660.0RadeonSI52.055.858.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterWarsow 2.5 BetaGPU Temperature Monitor1632486480
MinAvgMaxZink2.067.974.0RadeonSI6.068.286.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterWarsow 2.5 BetaGPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Unvanquished

Unvanquished is a modern fork of the Tremulous first person shooter. Unvanquished is powered by the Daemon engine, a combination of the ioquake3 (id Tech 3) engine with the graphically-beautiful XreaL engine. Unvanquished supports a modern OpenGL 3 renderer and other advanced graphics features for this open-source, cross-platform shooter game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: MediumZinkRadeonSI130260390520650SE +/- 3.65, N = 3SE +/- 0.90, N = 4624.3621.9
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: MediumZinkRadeonSI51015202519.5318.45
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.75.3RadeonSI0.24.16.1OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.032.059.0RadeonSI6.033.760.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Power Consumption Monitor16324864801. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 682 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 683 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.052.253.0RadeonSI51.052.855.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Temperature Monitor1530456075
MinAvgMaxZink1.041.873.0RadeonSI1.037.371.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: HighZinkRadeonSI130260390520650SE +/- 2.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.82, N = 3616.5617.7
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Effects Quality: HighZinkRadeonSI4812162015.3815.29
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.85.3RadeonSI0.34.27.1OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.040.182.0RadeonSI6.040.477.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Power Consumption Monitor204060801001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 868 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 835 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink53.055.557.0RadeonSI53.055.056.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Temperature Monitor1632486480
MinAvgMaxZink1.050.882.0RadeonSI2.052.681.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI130260390520650SE +/- 0.45, N = 3SE +/- 2.06, N = 3600.47599.54MIN: 396 / MAX: 970MIN: 379 / MAX: 1019
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraZinkRadeonSI1.04722.09443.14164.18885.2364.0664.654
MinAvgMaxZink0.04.55.4RadeonSI0.24.66.2OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.0147.7231.0RadeonSI6.0128.8255.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Power Consumption Monitor701402102803501. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 9254 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 8116 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink52.062.570.0RadeonSI53.061.567.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.069.799.0RadeonSI1.066.296.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.5GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Unvanquished

Unvanquished is a modern fork of the Tremulous first person shooter. Unvanquished is powered by the Daemon engine, a combination of the ioquake3 (id Tech 3) engine with the graphically-beautiful XreaL engine. Unvanquished supports a modern OpenGL 3 renderer and other advanced graphics features for this open-source, cross-platform shooter game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighZinkRadeonSI130260390520650SE +/- 0.92, N = 3SE +/- 1.11, N = 4619.9619.3
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighZinkRadeonSI4812162017.4416.61
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.75.2RadeonSI0.34.06.5OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor3691215
MinAvgMaxZink6.035.664.0RadeonSI6.037.365.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Power Consumption Monitor204060801001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 770 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 765 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink59.061.765.0RadeonSI58.061.265.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.048.076.0RadeonSI1.047.275.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.53GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

Team Fortress 2

This is a benchmark of Valve's free-to-play Team Fortress 2 game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that Team Fortress 2 is already installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080ZinkRadeonSI60120180240300SE +/- 2.11, N = 12SE +/- 1.37, N = 3270.94271.03
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTeam Fortress 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080ZinkRadeonSI4812162014.1911.95
MinAvgMaxZink0.03.48.1RadeonSI0.23.711.7OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTeam Fortress 2CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor48121620
MinAvgMaxZink6.019.161.0RadeonSI6.022.764.0OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTeam Fortress 2GPU Power Consumption Monitor204060801001. Zink: Approximate power consumption of 593 Joules per run.2. RadeonSI: Approximate power consumption of 726 Joules per run.
MinAvgMaxZink51.053.261.0RadeonSI53.056.561.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTeam Fortress 2GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100
MinAvgMaxZink1.044.384.0RadeonSI1.029.789.0OpenBenchmarking.orgPercent, Fewer Is BetterTeam Fortress 2GPU Usage Monitor20406080100

GPU Usage Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgPercentGPU Usage MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringZinkRadeonSI20406080100Min: 1 / Avg: 74.43 / Max: 99Min: 1 / Avg: 71.25 / Max: 99

GPU Temperature Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsiusGPU Temperature MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringZinkRadeonSI1530456075Min: 36 / Avg: 62.71 / Max: 79Min: 35 / Avg: 63.11 / Max: 79

GPU Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsGPU Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringZinkRadeonSI50100150200250Min: 6 / Avg: 112.6 / Max: 258Min: 6 / Avg: 117.69 / Max: 257

CPU Usage (Summary) Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgPercentCPU Usage (Summary) MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringZinkRadeonSI918273645Min: 0 / Avg: 6.07 / Max: 33.42Min: 0 / Avg: 7.93 / Max: 45.47

Zink

Processor: Intel Core i9-12900K @ 5.20GHz (16 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (1601 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake-S PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 + 2000GB, Graphics: zink 16GB (2575/1000MHz), Audio: Intel Alder Lake-S HD Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411

OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.18.0-051800-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.3.0-devel (git-1d521a5 2022-08-20 jammy-oibaf-ppa), Vulkan: 1.3.224, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Environment Notes: MESA_LOADER_DRIVER_OVERRIDE=zink
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x1f - Thermald 2.4.9
Vbios Version Notes: 113-D4120500-101
Python Notes: Python 3.10.4
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Testing initiated at 21 August 2022 11:05 by user pts.

RadeonSI

Processor: Intel Core i9-12900K @ 5.20GHz (16 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (1601 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Alder Lake-S PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 + 2000GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB (2575/1000MHz), Audio: Intel Alder Lake-S HD Audio, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411

OS: Ubuntu 22.04, Kernel: 5.18.0-051800-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 42.2, Display Server: X Server 1.21.1.3 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 22.3.0-devel (git-1d521a5 2022-08-20 jammy-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 14.0.6 DRM 3.46), Vulkan: 1.3.224, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x1f - Thermald 2.4.9
Graphics Notes: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 16368 MB - vBIOS Version: 113-D4120500-101
Python Notes: Python 3.10.4
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Testing initiated at 21 August 2022 17:36 by user pts.