Core i9 12900K Core Configuration Intel Core i9-12900K testing with a ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (0702 BIOS) and Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 16GB on Ubuntu 21.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2111052-TJ-COREI912997&grw .
Core i9 12900K Core Configuration Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server OpenGL Vulkan Compiler File-System Screen Resolution 8 P + HT + 8 E Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (16 Cores / 24 Threads) ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (0702 BIOS) Intel Device 7aa7 64GB 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 + 2000GB Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 16GB (2575/1000MHz) Intel Device 7ad0 ASUS VP28U Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 Ubuntu 21.10 5.15.0-051500rc6daily20211023-generic (x86_64) 20211022 GNOME Shell 40.5 X Server 1.20.13 + Wayland 4.6 Mesa 22.0.0-devel (git-c2d522b 2021-10-23 impish-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 12.0.1 DRM 3.42 5.15.0-051500rc6daily20211023-generic) 1.2.195 GCC 11.2.0 ext4 3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise - CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=native" CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native" - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0x12 - Thermald 2.4.6 - BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 16368 MB - Python 3.9.7 - itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Core i9 12900K Core Configuration selenium: ARES-6 - Google Chrome selenium: Speedometer - Google Chrome selenium: Jetstream 2 - Google Chrome selenium: StyleBench - Google Chrome selenium: PSPDFKit WASM - Google Chrome selenium: WASM collisionDetection - Google Chrome selenium: WASM imageConvolute - Google Chrome selenium: Kraken - Google Chrome compress-lz4: 1 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 1 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Decompression Speed astcenc: Thorough astcenc: Exhaustive hugin: Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time jpegxl-decode: 1 jpegxl-decode: All jpegxl: JPEG - 7 jpegxl: JPEG - 8 jpegxl: PNG - 7 jpegxl: PNG - 8 libraw: Post-Processing Benchmark rawtherapee: Total Benchmark Time webp: Quality 100 webp: Quality 100, Lossless synthmark: VoiceMark_100 xmrig: Monero - 1M xmrig: Wownero - 1M tesseract: 1920 x 1080 xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - High xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultra xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimate daphne: OpenMP - Euclidean Cluster daphne: OpenMP - NDT Mapping daphne: OpenMP - Points2Image plaidml: No - Inference - ResNet 50 - CPU plaidml: No - Inference - VGG16 - CPU plaidml: No - Inference - VGG19 - CPU lczero: BLAS lczero: Eigen deepspeech: CPU rnnoise: onnx: yolov4 - CPU onnx: fcn-resnet101-11 - CPU onnx: shufflenet-v2-10 - CPU onnx: super-resolution-10 - CPU opencv: DNN - Deep Neural Network opencv: Features 2D opencv: Object Detection ncnn: CPU - mobilenet ncnn: CPU-v2-v2 - mobilenet-v2 ncnn: CPU-v3-v3 - mobilenet-v3 ncnn: CPU - shufflenet-v2 ncnn: CPU - mnasnet ncnn: CPU - efficientnet-b0 ncnn: CPU - blazeface ncnn: CPU - googlenet ncnn: CPU - vgg16 ncnn: CPU - resnet18 ncnn: CPU - alexnet ncnn: CPU - resnet50 ncnn: CPU - yolov4-tiny ncnn: CPU - squeezenet_ssd ncnn: CPU - regnety_400m gromacs: MPI CPU - water_GMX50_bare namd: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - f32 - CPU onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - f32 - CPU onednn: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - u8s8f32 - CPU wireguard: coremark: CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second stockfish: Total Time compress-7zip: Compress Speed Test compress-zstd: 3 - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 3 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 8 - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 8 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19 - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 19 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed cpuminer-opt: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin cpuminer-opt: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite cpuminer-opt: Myriad-Groestl cpuminer-opt: Magi cpuminer-opt: Blake-2 S cpuminer-opt: x25x cpuminer-opt: Garlicoin cpuminer-opt: Ringcoin cpuminer-opt: Deepcoin cpuminer-opt: Skeincoin cpuminer-opt: LBC, LBRY Credits build-linux-kernel: Time To Compile sysbench: CPU aom-av1: Speed 10 Realtime - Bosphorus 1080p aom-av1: Speed 10 Realtime - Bosphorus 4K aom-av1: Speed 8 Realtime - Bosphorus 1080p aom-av1: Speed 8 Realtime - Bosphorus 4K aom-av1: Speed 6 Realtime - Bosphorus 1080p aom-av1: Speed 6 Realtime - Bosphorus 4K svt-vp9: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p svt-vp9: VMAF Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p svt-av1: Preset 8 - Bosphorus 1080p svt-av1: Preset 8 - Bosphorus 4K svt-av1: Preset 4 - Bosphorus 1080p svt-av1: Preset 4 - Bosphorus 4K svt-hevc: 7 - Bosphorus 1080p svt-hevc: 10 - Bosphorus 1080p avifenc: 6 avifenc: 6, Lossless avifenc: 10 build-godot: Time To Compile embree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragon embree: Pathtracer - Crown embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Crown oidn: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 etlegacy: 1920 x 1080 etlegacy: 3840 x 2160 oidn: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 unvanquished: 3840 x 2160 - Ultra oidn: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 ospray: Magnetic Reconnection - SciVis ospray: Magnetic Reconnection - Path Tracer ospray: XFrog Forest - SciVis ospray: XFrog Forest - Path Tracer ospray: NASA Streamlines - SciVis ospray: NASA Streamlines - Path Tracer unvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - Medium build-mesa: Time To Compile unvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - High ospray: San Miguel - Path Tracer unvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra ospray: San Miguel - SciVis openssl: RSA4096 unvanquished: 3840 x 2160 - Medium unvanquished: 3840 x 2160 - High openssl: RSA4096 openssl: SHA256 8 P + HT + 8 E 10.65 267 220.740 65.1 2845 270.66 24.22 553.0 12072.72 13290.5 77.19 12680.9 75.37 12445.7 6.8296 32.7522 32.334 82.06 417.81 78.37 30.26 8.82 0.7 62.61 36.077 1.615 12.681 1022.13 6298.0 10624.1 988.5098 561.1740678 505.6699467 452.5932885 1617.13 1280.03 34007.622536905 9.28 24.90 20.58 1092 1804 53.87142 15.868 640 97 40257 5006 5048 193995 44933 8.79 2.78 2.41 2.52 2.49 4.35 1.09 7.98 28.19 8.53 8.88 14.92 13.42 12.19 5.93 1.632 0.79125 7.13769 7.48850 1.26699 2.04832 2878.71 2880.93 1615.78 1615.76 107.444 724700.468657 48294830 97090 4432.9 4956.6 787.0 3522.7 42.2 3500.8 31.3 3587.2 264873 132160 13917 557.05 542007 669.24 2902.28 4028.40 14130 115290 43567 48.084 63104.69 205.83 89.24 150.85 59.90 10.47 12.72 369.28 369.93 89.215 22.041 6.024 1.904 226.98 466.33 8.504 32.280 2.518 65.553 21.9375 19.7558 24.5257 21.2518 0.34 743.9 746.2 0.34 383.9 0.17 26.32 500 4.71 2.48 35.51 6.99 414.6 28.393 373.9 2.33 355.0 28.57 4272.1 371.7 376.9 278159.7 23620518300 OpenBenchmarking.org
Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 10.65 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs Per Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 10.56, N = 15 267 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 8.78, N = 9 220.74 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs / Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 65.1 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 53.74, N = 15 2845 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 23.23, N = 15 270.66 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 1.72, N = 15 24.22 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 40.43, N = 15 553.0 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 11.01, N = 3 12072.72 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 39.39, N = 3 13290.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 77.19 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 13.84, N = 3 12680.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 75.37 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 220.02, N = 3 12445.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
ASTC Encoder Preset: Thorough OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.0126, N = 6 6.8296 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -flto -pthread
ASTC Encoder Preset: Exhaustive OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive 8 P + HT + 8 E 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 32.75 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -flto -pthread
Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time 8 P + HT + 8 E 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 32.33
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Threads: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: 1 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 82.06
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Threads: All OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: All 8 P + HT + 8 E 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 417.81
JPEG XL libjxl Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.27, N = 15 78.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -funwind-tables -O2 -pthread -fPIE -pie
JPEG XL libjxl Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.05, N = 5 30.26 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -funwind-tables -O2 -pthread -fPIE -pie
JPEG XL libjxl Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 8.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -funwind-tables -O2 -pthread -fPIE -pie
JPEG XL libjxl Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.1575 0.315 0.4725 0.63 0.7875 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.7 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -funwind-tables -O2 -pthread -fPIE -pie
LibRaw Post-Processing Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Mpix/sec, More Is Better LibRaw 0.20 Post-Processing Benchmark 8 P + HT + 8 E 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 2.34, N = 15 62.61 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -ljpeg -lz -lm
RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time 8 P + HT + 8 E 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 36.08 1. RawTherapee, version 5.8, command line.
WebP Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Encode Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.3634 0.7268 1.0902 1.4536 1.817 SE +/- 0.000, N = 11 1.615 1. (CC) gcc options: -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -march=native -lm -ljpeg -lpng16 -ltiff
WebP Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless OpenBenchmarking.org Encode Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 12.68 1. (CC) gcc options: -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -march=native -lm -ljpeg -lpng16 -ltiff
Google SynthMark Test: VoiceMark_100 OpenBenchmarking.org Voices, More Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 8 P + HT + 8 E 200 400 600 800 1000 1022.13 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -std=c++11 -Ofast
Xmrig Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M 8 P + HT + 8 E 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 4.90, N = 3 6298.0 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fexceptions -fno-rtti -maes -Ofast -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -rdynamic -lssl -lcrypto -luv -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lhwloc
Xmrig Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M 8 P + HT + 8 E 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 14.90, N = 3 10624.1 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fexceptions -fno-rtti -maes -Ofast -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -rdynamic -lssl -lcrypto -luv -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lhwloc
Tesseract Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 8 P + HT + 8 E 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.41, N = 3 988.51
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High 8 P + HT + 8 E 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 10.90, N = 12 561.17 MIN: 226 / MAX: 1581
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra 8 P + HT + 8 E 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 16.73, N = 15 505.67 MIN: 186 / MAX: 1390
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate 8 P + HT + 8 E 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 5.40, N = 3 452.59 MIN: 78 / MAX: 1269
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Euclidean Cluster OpenBenchmarking.org Test Cases Per Minute, More Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Euclidean Cluster 8 P + HT + 8 E 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 17.52, N = 15 1617.13 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: NDT Mapping OpenBenchmarking.org Test Cases Per Minute, More Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: NDT Mapping 8 P + HT + 8 E 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.87, N = 4 1280.03 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Points2Image OpenBenchmarking.org Test Cases Per Minute, More Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Points2Image 8 P + HT + 8 E 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 790.95, N = 15 34007.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.15, N = 12 9.28
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.25, N = 6 24.90
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 20.58
LeelaChessZero Backend: BLAS OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: BLAS 8 P + HT + 8 E 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 4.33, N = 3 1092 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -O3 -march=native -pthread
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: Eigen 8 P + HT + 8 E 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 17.57, N = 3 1804 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -O3 -march=native -pthread
DeepSpeech Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.50, N = 15 53.87
RNNoise OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RNNoise 2020-06-28 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 15.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pedantic -fvisibility=hidden
ONNX Runtime Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 9.36, N = 12 640 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -mtune=native -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
ONNX Runtime Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 97 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -mtune=native -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
ONNX Runtime Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 905.56, N = 12 40257 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -mtune=native -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
ONNX Runtime Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 76.35, N = 12 5006 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -mtune=native -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
OpenCV Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network 8 P + HT + 8 E 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 80.53, N = 15 5048 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -O3 -march=native -fsigned-char -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fvisibility=hidden -shared
OpenCV Test: Features 2D OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D 8 P + HT + 8 E 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 12525.06, N = 12 193995 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -O3 -march=native -fsigned-char -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fvisibility=hidden -shared
OpenCV Test: Object Detection OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection 8 P + HT + 8 E 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 3180.69, N = 15 44933 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -O3 -march=native -fsigned-char -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fvisibility=hidden -shared
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.08, N = 8 8.79 MIN: 8.59 / MAX: 18.46 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.6255 1.251 1.8765 2.502 3.1275 SE +/- 0.01, N = 8 2.78 MIN: 2.73 / MAX: 3.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.5423 1.0846 1.6269 2.1692 2.7115 SE +/- 0.01, N = 8 2.41 MIN: 2.36 / MAX: 4.24 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.567 1.134 1.701 2.268 2.835 SE +/- 0.00, N = 8 2.52 MIN: 2.48 / MAX: 2.72 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.5603 1.1206 1.6809 2.2412 2.8015 SE +/- 0.00, N = 8 2.49 MIN: 2.45 / MAX: 3.01 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.9788 1.9576 2.9364 3.9152 4.894 SE +/- 0.00, N = 8 4.35 MIN: 4.3 / MAX: 4.72 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: blazeface OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.2453 0.4906 0.7359 0.9812 1.2265 SE +/- 0.00, N = 8 1.09 MIN: 1.06 / MAX: 1.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: googlenet OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 8 7.98 MIN: 7.9 / MAX: 11.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.03, N = 8 28.19 MIN: 27.95 / MAX: 33.83 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 8 8.53 MIN: 8.45 / MAX: 15.51 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: alexnet OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 8 8.88 MIN: 8.85 / MAX: 9.7 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 8 14.92 MIN: 14.82 / MAX: 22.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.26, N = 8 13.42 MIN: 12.99 / MAX: 22.09 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.10, N = 8 12.19 MIN: 11.99 / MAX: 118.19 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m 8 P + HT + 8 E 1.3343 2.6686 4.0029 5.3372 6.6715 SE +/- 0.02, N = 8 5.93 MIN: 5.78 / MAX: 13.84 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
GROMACS Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day, More Is Better GROMACS 2021.2 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.3672 0.7344 1.1016 1.4688 1.836 SE +/- 0.012, N = 3 1.632 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native
NAMD ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.178 0.356 0.534 0.712 0.89 SE +/- 0.00323, N = 3 0.79125
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00204, N = 7 7.13769 MIN: 7.05 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00286, N = 7 7.48850 MIN: 7.39 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.2851 0.5702 0.8553 1.1404 1.4255 SE +/- 0.00071, N = 4 1.26699 MIN: 1.23 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.4609 0.9218 1.3827 1.8436 2.3045 SE +/- 0.11208, N = 15 2.04832 MIN: 1.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 2878.71 MIN: 2870.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 1.27, N = 3 2880.93 MIN: 2871.58 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.96, N = 3 1615.78 MIN: 1610.55 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 1615.76 MIN: 1609.92 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 107.44
Coremark CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second 8 P + HT + 8 E 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 2264.99, N = 3 724700.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -O3 -march=native -lrt" -lrt
Stockfish Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Stockfish 13 Total Time 8 P + HT + 8 E 10M 20M 30M 40M 50M SE +/- 367596.14, N = 15 48294830 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lgcov -m64 -lpthread -O3 -march=native -fno-exceptions -std=c++17 -pedantic -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -mavx2 -msse4.1 -mssse3 -msse2 -mbmi2 -flto -fprofile-use -fno-peel-loops -fno-tracer -flto=jobserver
7-Zip Compression Compress Speed Test OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test 8 P + HT + 8 E 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 682.68, N = 3 97090 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -lpthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 45.22, N = 6 4432.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 26.67, N = 3 4956.6 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 8.96, N = 4 787.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 2.94, N = 4 3522.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 42.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 496.73, N = 3 3500.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 31.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 492.55, N = 3 3587.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 1251.19, N = 3 264873 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite 8 P + HT + 8 E 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 20.82, N = 3 132160 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl 8 P + HT + 8 E 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 21.86, N = 3 13917 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Magi OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi 8 P + HT + 8 E 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 557.05 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Blake-2 S OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S 8 P + HT + 8 E 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 2502.49, N = 3 542007 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: x25x OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x 8 P + HT + 8 E 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 1.16, N = 3 669.24 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Garlicoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 8.88, N = 3 2902.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Ringcoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 53.56, N = 3 4028.40 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Deepcoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 17.32, N = 3 14130 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Skeincoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 745.01, N = 3 115290 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits 8 P + HT + 8 E 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 196.50, N = 3 43567 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 Time To Compile 8 P + HT + 8 E 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.40, N = 3 48.08
Sysbench Test: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Events Per Second, More Is Better Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 2.25, N = 3 63104.69 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -funroll-loops -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -ldl -laio -lm
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.81, N = 15 205.83 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.81, N = 15 89.24 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.26, N = 15 150.85 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.53, N = 15 59.90 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.49, N = 15 10.47 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.39, N = 15 12.72 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
SVT-VP9 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 5.68, N = 15 369.28 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -march=native -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
SVT-VP9 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.68, N = 11 369.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -march=native -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.37, N = 6 89.22 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq -pie
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 22.04 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq -pie
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.010, N = 3 6.024 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq -pie
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.4284 0.8568 1.2852 1.7136 2.142 SE +/- 0.020, N = 3 1.904 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq -pie
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.44, N = 9 226.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fPIE -fPIC -O2 -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 0.39, N = 12 466.33 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fPIE -fPIC -O2 -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 Encoder Speed: 6 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.055, N = 5 8.504 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 32.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 Encoder Speed: 10 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.5666 1.1332 1.6998 2.2664 2.833 SE +/- 0.026, N = 15 2.518 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile 8 P + HT + 8 E 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 65.55
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon 8 P + HT + 8 E 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 21.94 MIN: 21.55 / MAX: 22.7
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown 8 P + HT + 8 E 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 19.76 MIN: 19.46 / MAX: 20.24
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon 8 P + HT + 8 E 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 24.53 MIN: 24.29 / MAX: 25.1
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown 8 P + HT + 8 E 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 21.25 MIN: 20.93 / MAX: 21.83
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0765 0.153 0.2295 0.306 0.3825 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.34
ET: Legacy Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 8 P + HT + 8 E 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 7.99, N = 4 743.9
ET: Legacy Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 8 P + HT + 8 E 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 2.49, N = 4 746.2
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0765 0.153 0.2295 0.306 0.3825 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.34
Unvanquished Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra 8 P + HT + 8 E 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 16.01, N = 12 383.9
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0383 0.0766 0.1149 0.1532 0.1915 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.17
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 26.32 MIN: 19.61 / MAX: 27.03
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.00, N = 12 500 MIN: 250
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 1.0598 2.1196 3.1794 4.2392 5.299 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 4.71 MIN: 3.6 / MAX: 4.78
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.558 1.116 1.674 2.232 2.79 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 2.48 MIN: 1.95 / MAX: 2.52
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.21, N = 6 35.51 MIN: 34.48 / MAX: 35.71
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 6.99 MIN: 5.41 / MAX: 7.14
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Medium 8 P + HT + 8 E 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 11.08, N = 15 414.6
Timed Mesa Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 Time To Compile 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.50, N = 15 28.39
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High 8 P + HT + 8 E 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 14.47, N = 15 373.9
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.5243 1.0486 1.5729 2.0972 2.6215 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 2.33 MIN: 1.97 / MAX: 2.35
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra 8 P + HT + 8 E 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 16.79, N = 15 355.0
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 28.57 MIN: 23.26
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org sign/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 8 P + HT + 8 E 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 16.07, N = 3 4272.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
Unvanquished Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Medium 8 P + HT + 8 E 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 17.98, N = 12 371.7
Unvanquished Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High 8 P + HT + 8 E 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 12.47, N = 15 376.9
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 8 P + HT + 8 E 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 1645.32, N = 3 278159.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA256 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 8 P + HT + 8 E 5000M 10000M 15000M 20000M 25000M SE +/- 86656587.15, N = 3 23620518300 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
Tesseract Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 29.59
Tesseract CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 33.4 55.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Tesseract CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 31.4 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 17.11
Xonotic CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 32.8 50.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
Xonotic CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 30.8 54.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 14.96
Xonotic CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 33.8 51.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Xonotic CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 32.6 58.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 12.06
Xonotic CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 37.5 51.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Xonotic CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 35.4 57.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Medium 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 14.47
Unvanquished CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 28.7 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Unvanquished CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0 29.8 55.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 13.48
Unvanquished CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 27.7 44.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Unvanquished CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0 27.8 51.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 13.26
Unvanquished CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 26.8 44.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Unvanquished CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 28.0 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Unvanquished Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Medium 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 13.78
Unvanquished CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 27.0 43.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Unvanquished CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 28.2 51.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Unvanquished Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 13.13
Unvanquished CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 28.7 45.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Unvanquished CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 28.6 53.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Unvanquished Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 13.66
Unvanquished CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 28.1 41.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Unvanquished CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 29.1 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
ET: Legacy Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 8 P + HT + 8 E 6 12 18 24 30 26.27
ET: Legacy CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 28.3 43.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
ET: Legacy CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 32.7 57.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
ET: Legacy Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 8 P + HT + 8 E 6 12 18 24 30 26.26
ET: Legacy CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 28.4 40.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
ET: Legacy CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 37.2 57.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 96.9 137.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 50.9 62.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
NAMD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 204.1 252.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
NAMD CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 27.0 87.4 100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
GROMACS Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day Per Watt, More Is Better GROMACS 2021.2 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.009
GROMACS CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.4 182.9 213.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GROMACS 2021.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
GROMACS CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 83.7 100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GROMACS 2021.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Xmrig Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M 8 P + HT + 8 E 9 18 27 36 45 38.92
Xmrig CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 161.8 167.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Xmrig CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 69.4 73.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Xmrig Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M 8 P + HT + 8 E 12 24 36 48 60 55.34
Xmrig CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 192.0 203.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Xmrig CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 80.7 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 100.44
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 49.3 97.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 36.3 65.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 14 28 42 56 70 61.07
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 57.7 122.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 37.9 57.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 13 26 39 52 65 56.78
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 61.7 124.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 43.7 62.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 14 28 42 56 70 62.58
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 57.3 122.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 37.8 63.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 100 200 300 400 500 469.68
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 28.3 33.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
LZ4 Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 27.4 29.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 90 180 270 360 450 401.37
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 31.6 39.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
LZ4 Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 27.4 30.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 90 180 270 360 450 393.01
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 31.7 36.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
LZ4 Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 27.3 29.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
7-Zip Compression Compress Speed Test OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS Per Watt, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test 8 P + HT + 8 E 150 300 450 600 750 700.73
7-Zip Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 3.8 138.6 184.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better 7-Zip Compression 16.02 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
7-Zip Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 63.0 78.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better 7-Zip Compression 16.02 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
libavif avifenc CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 71.3 225.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
libavif avifenc CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 28.0 46.7 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
libavif avifenc CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 154.6 241.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
libavif avifenc CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 70.3 96.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
libavif avifenc CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.3 25.5 102.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
libavif avifenc CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 30.7 74.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 83.2 230.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
ASTC Encoder CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 48.8 82.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 187.3 239.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
ASTC Encoder CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 77.1 96.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
WebP Image Encode CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 14.2 35.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
WebP Image Encode CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 27.3 33.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
WebP Image Encode CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.4 23.8 34.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
WebP Image Encode CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 25.9 28.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
JPEG XL libjxl Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.7497 1.4994 2.2491 2.9988 3.7485 3.332
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 23.5 43.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 26.9 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
JPEG XL libjxl Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.3609 0.7218 1.0827 1.4436 1.8045 1.604
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 18.9 27.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 25.2 49.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
JPEG XL libjxl Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0549 0.1098 0.1647 0.2196 0.2745 0.244
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 36.1 74.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 22.0 30.1 69.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
JPEG XL libjxl Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0072 0.0144 0.0216 0.0288 0.036 0.032
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 4.35 / Avg: 22.18 / Max: 63.18
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 21 / Avg: 24.54 / Max: 59
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Threads: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: 1 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.596 1.192 1.788 2.384 2.98 2.649
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 31.0 35.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 33.0 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Threads: All OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: All 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 6.045
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 69.1 133.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 42.6 71.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Hugin CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 63.2 160.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Hugin CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Hugin CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 40.6 69.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hugin CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
RawTherapee CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 85.8 132.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
RawTherapee CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 48.3 70.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LibRaw Post-Processing Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Mpix/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LibRaw 0.20 Post-Processing Benchmark 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.3236 0.6472 0.9708 1.2944 1.618 1.438
LibRaw CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 43.5 72.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LibRaw 0.20 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LibRaw CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 33.4 70.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LibRaw 0.20 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.2414 0.4828 0.7242 0.9656 1.207 1.073
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 83.1 143.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
SVT-AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 45.2 69.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0473 0.0946 0.1419 0.1892 0.2365 0.21
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 105.1 164.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 50.9 78.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0155 0.031 0.0465 0.062 0.0775 0.069
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 87.8 170.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0 43.9 84.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0041 0.0082 0.0123 0.0164 0.0205 0.018
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 104.5 217.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
SVT-AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 26.0 53.0 88.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.6014 1.2028 1.8042 2.4056 3.007 2.673
SVT-HEVC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 84.9 227.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
SVT-HEVC CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 26.0 47.7 84.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 9.112
SVT-HEVC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 51.2 208.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
SVT-HEVC CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 35.1 74.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-VP9 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 6.612
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 55.9 196.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-VP9 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 35.2 70.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-VP9 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 6.7
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.3 55.2 194.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-VP9 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0 36.9 70.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 1.1054 2.2108 3.3162 4.4216 5.527 4.913
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 41.9 96.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 31.9 47.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.3105 0.621 0.9315 1.242 1.5525 1.38
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 64.6 107.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 40.4 61.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.7457 1.4914 2.2371 2.9828 3.7285 3.314
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 45.5 107.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 34.5 55.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.1717 0.3434 0.5151 0.6868 0.8585 0.763
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 78.5 119.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 44.4 62.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0396 0.0792 0.1188 0.1584 0.198 0.176
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.3 59.5 90.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0 40.1 73.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0369 0.0738 0.1107 0.1476 0.1845 0.164
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 2.4 77.7 108.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 45.1 73.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0446 0.0892 0.1338 0.1784 0.223 0.198
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 132.7 206.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 57.8 78.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 14.00
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 35.7 158.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 31.9 67.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0052 0.0104 0.0156 0.0208 0.026 0.023
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 205.1 246.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 83.5 98.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0027 0.0054 0.0081 0.0108 0.0135 0.012
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 215.6 242.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 33.0 90.2 100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0614 0.1228 0.1842 0.2456 0.307 0.273
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 130.3 235.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 33.0 65.0 89.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0081 0.0162 0.0243 0.0324 0.0405 0.036
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.2 194.4 240.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 29.0 79.6 94.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0727 0.1454 0.2181 0.2908 0.3635 0.323
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 88.5 232.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 51.2 88.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0029 0.0058 0.0087 0.0116 0.0145 0.013
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.2 181.4 217.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 28.0 76.1 88.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0279 0.0558 0.0837 0.1116 0.1395 0.124
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 177.2 207.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 77.0 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0227 0.0454 0.0681 0.0908 0.1135 0.101
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 194.8 232.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 80.7 94.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0311 0.0622 0.0933 0.1244 0.1555 0.138
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 177.1 210.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 74.9 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0245 0.049 0.0735 0.098 0.1225 0.109
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 194.8 233.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 81.0 93.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0011 0.0022 0.0033 0.0044 0.0055 0.005
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 2.5 72.6 129.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 40.6 69.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0011 0.0022 0.0033 0.0044 0.0055 0.005
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.0 71.0 123.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 39.4 69.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025 0.002
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 3.4 72.8 123.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 22.0 40.0 68.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Coremark CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second 8 P + HT + 8 E 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 5192.10
Coremark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 139.6 188.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Coremark 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Coremark CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 63.3 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Coremark 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Google SynthMark Test: VoiceMark_100 OpenBenchmarking.org Voices Per Watt, More Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 8 P + HT + 8 E 13 26 39 52 65 58.45
Google SynthMark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 17.5 22.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Google SynthMark CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 25.3 31.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 CPU Temperature Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
Stockfish Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Stockfish 13 Total Time 8 P + HT + 8 E 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K 253756.27
Stockfish CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 190.3 258.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stockfish 13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Stockfish CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 80.3 100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Stockfish 13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LeelaChessZero Backend: BLAS OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: BLAS 8 P + HT + 8 E 1.2886 2.5772 3.8658 5.1544 6.443 5.727
LeelaChessZero CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 190.7 246.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
LeelaChessZero CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 81.1 98.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: Eigen 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 9.892
LeelaChessZero CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.2 182.4 219.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
LeelaChessZero CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 76.7 90.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.2 162.6 225.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 73.6 96.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 159.6 225.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 28.0 71.8 93.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Mesa Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 150.1 224.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Timed Mesa Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 30.0 69.2 93.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3629.99
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 73.0 115.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 40.7 66.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite 8 P + HT + 8 E 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1631.71
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 81.0 112.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 43.9 67.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl 8 P + HT + 8 E 30 60 90 120 150 114.13
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 121.9 151.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 57.6 67.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Magi OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.7763 1.5526 2.3289 3.1052 3.8815 3.45
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 161.4 197.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 28.0 73.3 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Blake-2 S OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S 8 P + HT + 8 E 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 7393.09
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 73.3 138.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 28.0 42.1 73.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: x25x OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.7623 1.5246 2.2869 3.0492 3.8115 3.388
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 197.5 239.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 82.3 98.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Garlicoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 16.09
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.2 180.4 208.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 76.1 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Ringcoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 5 10 15 20 25 21.52
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.2 187.2 222.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 80.0 93.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Deepcoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 84.10
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 168.0 204.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 73.8 85.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Skeincoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 300 600 900 1200 1500 1301.48
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 88.6 163.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 28.0 46.3 57.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits 8 P + HT + 8 E 70 140 210 280 350 326.67
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 133.4 212.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 59.4 81.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 8 P + HT + 8 E 300 600 900 1200 1500 1538.21
OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 180.8 203.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenSSL CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 28.0 81.9 90.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA256 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 8 P + HT + 8 E 30M 60M 90M 120M 150M 121145527.94
OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 195.0 243.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OpenSSL CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 87.8 100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 100.1 188.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 29.0 49.0 66.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 81.4 148.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 26.0 44.1 57.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 121.0 190.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 52.5 72.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 120.5 216.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 27.0 57.0 85.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.4 183.6 205.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 27.0 73.6 82.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 184.3 205.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 74.4 82.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 183.5 209.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 75.1 84.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 183.6 209.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 75.2 84.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0509 0.1018 0.1527 0.2036 0.2545 0.226
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 4.36 / Avg: 40.99 / Max: 51.53
PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 23 / Avg: 40.26 / Max: 62
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0331 0.0662 0.0993 0.1324 0.1655 0.147
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 168.9 226.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 20.0 69.0 93.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0254 0.0508 0.0762 0.1016 0.127 0.113
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 182.6 225.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 27.0 74.0 94.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ONNX Runtime Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.8512 1.7024 2.5536 3.4048 4.256 3.783
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 4.62 / Avg: 169.18 / Max: 192.99
ONNX Runtime CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 32 / Avg: 85.57 / Max: 100
ONNX Runtime Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.126 0.252 0.378 0.504 0.63 0.56
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 173.4 199.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
ONNX Runtime CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 30.0 87.7 98.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ONNX Runtime Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 70 140 210 280 350 335.57
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 4.64 / Avg: 119.97 / Max: 136.06
ONNX Runtime CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 13 26 39 52 65 Min: 30 / Avg: 62.97 / Max: 69
ONNX Runtime Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 31.87
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 5.04 / Avg: 157.06 / Max: 184.16
ONNX Runtime CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 27 / Avg: 81.34 / Max: 96
OpenCV CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 103.5 202.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenCV CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 29.0 49.6 80.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenCV CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 4.07 / Avg: 70.64 / Max: 157.93
OpenCV CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 14 28 42 56 70 Min: 23 / Avg: 42.82 / Max: 73
OpenCV CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.4 51.6 151.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
OpenCV CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 38.9 67.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
NCNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 125.0 168.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
NCNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 55.8 69.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Euclidean Cluster OpenBenchmarking.org Test Cases Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Euclidean Cluster 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 31.50
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 51.3 95.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 34.7 51.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: NDT Mapping OpenBenchmarking.org Test Cases Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: NDT Mapping 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 29.33
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 43.6 69.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 30.5 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Temperature Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Points2Image OpenBenchmarking.org Test Cases Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Points2Image 8 P + HT + 8 E 130 260 390 520 650 604.21
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 56.3 70.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 34.5 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Sysbench Test: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Events Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 110 220 330 440 550 518.59
Sysbench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 121.7 129.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Sysbench 1.0.20 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Sysbench CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 57.0 62.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Sysbench 1.0.20 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.4 23.9 41.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0 25.5 34.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 12.74
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 2.6 21.0 40.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 19.0 25.0 54.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 6 12 18 24 30 23.47
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 16 32 48 64 80 Min: 2.34 / Avg: 9.41 / Max: 86.8
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 16 / Avg: 20.69 / Max: 61
Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs / Minute Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.554 1.108 1.662 2.216 2.77 2.462
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 26.4 38.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 19.0 24.6 36.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 2.4 22.1 126.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 19.0 24.5 57.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 14.6 36.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 19.0 23.2 53.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 8.4 25.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 19.0 20.6 55.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.2 15.5 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 19.0 23.4 58.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
DeepSpeech CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 36.8 45.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
DeepSpeech CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 19.0 30.3 48.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
RNNoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 24.5 30.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RNNoise 2020-06-28 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
RNNoise CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 39.7 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RNNoise 2020-06-28 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Meta Performance Per Watts Performance Per Watts OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watts, More Is Better Meta Performance Per Watts Performance Per Watts 8 P + HT + 8 E 110 220 330 440 550 492.37
CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 8 P + HT + 8 E 50 100 150 200 250 Min: 2.34 / Avg: 82.91 / Max: 258.28
CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 0 / Avg: 47.4 / Max: 100
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5