Core i9 12900K Core Configuration Intel Core i9-12900K testing with a ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (0702 BIOS) and Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 16GB on Ubuntu 21.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2111052-TJ-COREI912997&grr .
Core i9 12900K Core Configuration Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server OpenGL Vulkan Compiler File-System Screen Resolution 8 P + HT + 8 E Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (16 Cores / 24 Threads) ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (0702 BIOS) Intel Device 7aa7 64GB 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 + 2000GB Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 16GB (2575/1000MHz) Intel Device 7ad0 ASUS VP28U Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 Ubuntu 21.10 5.15.0-051500rc6daily20211023-generic (x86_64) 20211022 GNOME Shell 40.5 X Server 1.20.13 + Wayland 4.6 Mesa 22.0.0-devel (git-c2d522b 2021-10-23 impish-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 12.0.1 DRM 3.42 5.15.0-051500rc6daily20211023-generic) 1.2.195 GCC 11.2.0 ext4 3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise - CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=native" CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native" - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0x12 - Thermald 2.4.6 - BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 16368 MB - Python 3.9.7 - itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Core i9 12900K Core Configuration selenium: Jetstream 2 - Google Chrome plaidml: No - Inference - ResNet 50 - CPU opencv: Features 2D onnx: yolov4 - CPU onnx: shufflenet-v2-10 - CPU onnx: super-resolution-10 - CPU jpegxl: PNG - 8 lczero: BLAS lczero: Eigen aom-av1: Speed 6 Realtime - Bosphorus 1080p daphne: OpenMP - Points2Image aom-av1: Speed 6 Realtime - Bosphorus 4K opencv: Object Detection deepspeech: CPU selenium: Speedometer - Google Chrome plaidml: No - Inference - VGG16 - CPU openssl: SHA256 oidn: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 xmrig: Monero - 1M selenium: PSPDFKit WASM - Google Chrome build-mesa: Time To Compile xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultra unvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra jpegxl: PNG - 7 onnx: fcn-resnet101-11 - CPU stockfish: Total Time unvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - High ncnn: CPU - regnety_400m ncnn: CPU - squeezenet_ssd ncnn: CPU - yolov4-tiny ncnn: CPU - resnet50 ncnn: CPU - alexnet ncnn: CPU - resnet18 ncnn: CPU - vgg16 ncnn: CPU - googlenet ncnn: CPU - blazeface ncnn: CPU - efficientnet-b0 ncnn: CPU - mnasnet ncnn: CPU - shufflenet-v2 ncnn: CPU-v3-v3 - mobilenet-v3 ncnn: CPU-v2-v2 - mobilenet-v2 ncnn: CPU - mobilenet unvanquished: 3840 x 2160 - High gromacs: MPI CPU - water_GMX50_bare plaidml: No - Inference - VGG19 - CPU unvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - Medium wireguard: ospray: San Miguel - Path Tracer libraw: Post-Processing Benchmark xmrig: Wownero - 1M selenium: Kraken - Google Chrome xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - High unvanquished: 3840 x 2160 - Ultra unvanquished: 3840 x 2160 - Medium sysbench: CPU ospray: XFrog Forest - Path Tracer oidn: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 oidn: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 svt-av1: Preset 4 - Bosphorus 4K onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Training - u8s8f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - f32 - CPU onednn: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - u8s8f32 - CPU compress-zstd: 3 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 3 - Compression Speed jpegxl: JPEG - 7 selenium: StyleBench - Google Chrome daphne: OpenMP - Euclidean Cluster build-godot: Time To Compile selenium: WASM collisionDetection - Google Chrome onednn: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - u8s8f32 - CPU openssl: RSA4096 openssl: RSA4096 namd: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms aom-av1: Speed 8 Realtime - Bosphorus 4K compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed synthmark: VoiceMark_100 build-linux-kernel: Time To Compile ospray: XFrog Forest - SciVis compress-zstd: 8 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 8 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 9 - Compression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 3 - Compression Speed compress-zstd: 19 - Decompression Speed compress-zstd: 19 - Compression Speed aom-av1: Speed 10 Realtime - Bosphorus 4K rawtherapee: Total Benchmark Time astcenc: Exhaustive jpegxl-decode: 1 selenium: WASM imageConvolute - Google Chrome hugin: Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time selenium: ARES-6 - Google Chrome avifenc: 6, Lossless embree: Pathtracer - Crown ospray: NASA Streamlines - Path Tracer tesseract: 1920 x 1080 cpuminer-opt: Magi cpuminer-opt: Myriad-Groestl cpuminer-opt: Skeincoin cpuminer-opt: x25x cpuminer-opt: LBC, LBRY Credits cpuminer-opt: Deepcoin cpuminer-opt: Ringcoin cpuminer-opt: Garlicoin cpuminer-opt: Blake-2 S cpuminer-opt: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin cpuminer-opt: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Crown compress-7zip: Compress Speed Test compress-lz4: 1 - Decompression Speed compress-lz4: 1 - Compression Speed embree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragon svt-av1: Preset 8 - Bosphorus 4K xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimate svt-av1: Preset 4 - Bosphorus 1080p embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon opencv: DNN - Deep Neural Network coremark: CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second ospray: San Miguel - SciVis aom-av1: Speed 8 Realtime - Bosphorus 1080p daphne: OpenMP - NDT Mapping rnnoise: jpegxl-decode: All etlegacy: 3840 x 2160 webp: Quality 100, Lossless etlegacy: 1920 x 1080 jpegxl: JPEG - 8 aom-av1: Speed 10 Realtime - Bosphorus 1080p onednn: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - f32 - CPU ospray: NASA Streamlines - SciVis ospray: Magnetic Reconnection - SciVis onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - f32 - CPU onednn: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - u8s8f32 - CPU svt-av1: Preset 8 - Bosphorus 1080p avifenc: 6 astcenc: Thorough avifenc: 10 svt-vp9: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p svt-hevc: 7 - Bosphorus 1080p svt-vp9: VMAF Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p webp: Quality 100 svt-hevc: 10 - Bosphorus 1080p ospray: Magnetic Reconnection - Path Tracer build-nodejs: 8 P + HT + 8 E 220.740 9.28 193995 640 40257 5006 0.7 1092 1804 10.47 34007.622536905 12.72 44933 53.87142 267 24.90 23620518300 0.17 6298.0 2845 28.393 505.6699467 355.0 8.82 97 48294830 373.9 5.93 12.19 13.42 14.92 8.88 8.53 28.19 7.98 1.09 4.35 2.49 2.52 2.41 2.78 8.79 376.9 1.632 20.58 414.6 107.444 2.33 62.61 10624.1 553.0 561.1740678 383.9 371.7 63104.69 2.48 0.34 0.34 1.904 2878.71 2880.93 1615.78 1615.76 4956.6 4432.9 78.37 65.1 1617.13 65.553 270.66 2.04832 278159.7 4272.1 0.79125 59.90 3587.2 31.3 1022.13 48.084 4.71 3522.7 787.0 12445.7 75.37 12680.9 77.19 3500.8 42.2 89.24 36.077 32.7522 82.06 24.22 32.334 10.65 32.280 19.7558 6.99 988.5098 557.05 13917 115290 669.24 43567 14130 4028.40 2902.28 542007 264873 132160 21.2518 97090 13290.5 12072.72 21.9375 22.041 452.5932885 6.024 24.5257 5048 724700.468657 28.57 150.85 1280.03 15.868 417.81 746.2 12.681 743.9 30.26 205.83 1.26699 35.51 26.32 7.13769 7.48850 89.215 8.504 6.8296 2.518 369.28 226.98 369.93 1.615 466.33 500 OpenBenchmarking.org
Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 8.78, N = 9 220.74 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.15, N = 12 9.28
OpenCV Test: Features 2D OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Features 2D 8 P + HT + 8 E 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 12525.06, N = 12 193995 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -O3 -march=native -fsigned-char -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fvisibility=hidden -shared
ONNX Runtime Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 9.36, N = 12 640 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -mtune=native -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
ONNX Runtime Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 905.56, N = 12 40257 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -mtune=native -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
ONNX Runtime Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 76.35, N = 12 5006 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -mtune=native -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
JPEG XL libjxl Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.1575 0.315 0.4725 0.63 0.7875 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.7 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -funwind-tables -O2 -pthread -fPIE -pie
LeelaChessZero Backend: BLAS OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: BLAS 8 P + HT + 8 E 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 4.33, N = 3 1092 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -O3 -march=native -pthread
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: Eigen 8 P + HT + 8 E 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 17.57, N = 3 1804 1. (CXX) g++ options: -flto -O3 -march=native -pthread
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.49, N = 15 10.47 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Points2Image OpenBenchmarking.org Test Cases Per Minute, More Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Points2Image 8 P + HT + 8 E 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 790.95, N = 15 34007.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.39, N = 15 12.72 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
OpenCV Test: Object Detection OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: Object Detection 8 P + HT + 8 E 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 3180.69, N = 15 44933 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -O3 -march=native -fsigned-char -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fvisibility=hidden -shared
DeepSpeech Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.50, N = 15 53.87
Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs Per Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 10.56, N = 15 267 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.25, N = 6 24.90
OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA256 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 8 P + HT + 8 E 5000M 10000M 15000M 20000M 25000M SE +/- 86656587.15, N = 3 23620518300 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0383 0.0766 0.1149 0.1532 0.1915 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.17
Xmrig Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M 8 P + HT + 8 E 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 4.90, N = 3 6298.0 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fexceptions -fno-rtti -maes -Ofast -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -rdynamic -lssl -lcrypto -luv -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lhwloc
Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 53.74, N = 15 2845 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
Timed Mesa Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 Time To Compile 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.50, N = 15 28.39
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra 8 P + HT + 8 E 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 16.73, N = 15 505.67 MIN: 186 / MAX: 1390
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra 8 P + HT + 8 E 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 16.79, N = 15 355.0
JPEG XL libjxl Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 8.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -funwind-tables -O2 -pthread -fPIE -pie
ONNX Runtime Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 97 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -mtune=native -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
Stockfish Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Stockfish 13 Total Time 8 P + HT + 8 E 10M 20M 30M 40M 50M SE +/- 367596.14, N = 15 48294830 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lgcov -m64 -lpthread -O3 -march=native -fno-exceptions -std=c++17 -pedantic -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -mavx2 -msse4.1 -mssse3 -msse2 -mbmi2 -flto -fprofile-use -fno-peel-loops -fno-tracer -flto=jobserver
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High 8 P + HT + 8 E 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 14.47, N = 15 373.9
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m 8 P + HT + 8 E 1.3343 2.6686 4.0029 5.3372 6.6715 SE +/- 0.02, N = 8 5.93 MIN: 5.78 / MAX: 13.84 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.10, N = 8 12.19 MIN: 11.99 / MAX: 118.19 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.26, N = 8 13.42 MIN: 12.99 / MAX: 22.09 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 8 14.92 MIN: 14.82 / MAX: 22.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: alexnet OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 8 8.88 MIN: 8.85 / MAX: 9.7 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 8 8.53 MIN: 8.45 / MAX: 15.51 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.03, N = 8 28.19 MIN: 27.95 / MAX: 33.83 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: googlenet OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 8 7.98 MIN: 7.9 / MAX: 11.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: blazeface OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.2453 0.4906 0.7359 0.9812 1.2265 SE +/- 0.00, N = 8 1.09 MIN: 1.06 / MAX: 1.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.9788 1.9576 2.9364 3.9152 4.894 SE +/- 0.00, N = 8 4.35 MIN: 4.3 / MAX: 4.72 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.5603 1.1206 1.6809 2.2412 2.8015 SE +/- 0.00, N = 8 2.49 MIN: 2.45 / MAX: 3.01 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.567 1.134 1.701 2.268 2.835 SE +/- 0.00, N = 8 2.52 MIN: 2.48 / MAX: 2.72 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.5423 1.0846 1.6269 2.1692 2.7115 SE +/- 0.01, N = 8 2.41 MIN: 2.36 / MAX: 4.24 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.6255 1.251 1.8765 2.502 3.1275 SE +/- 0.01, N = 8 2.78 MIN: 2.73 / MAX: 3.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
NCNN Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.08, N = 8 8.79 MIN: 8.59 / MAX: 18.46 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -lgomp -lpthread
Unvanquished Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High 8 P + HT + 8 E 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 12.47, N = 15 376.9
GROMACS Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day, More Is Better GROMACS 2021.2 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.3672 0.7344 1.1016 1.4688 1.836 SE +/- 0.012, N = 3 1.632 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 20.58
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Medium 8 P + HT + 8 E 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 11.08, N = 15 414.6
WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 107.44
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.5243 1.0486 1.5729 2.0972 2.6215 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 2.33 MIN: 1.97 / MAX: 2.35
LibRaw Post-Processing Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Mpix/sec, More Is Better LibRaw 0.20 Post-Processing Benchmark 8 P + HT + 8 E 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 2.34, N = 15 62.61 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp -ljpeg -lz -lm
Xmrig Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M OpenBenchmarking.org H/s, More Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M 8 P + HT + 8 E 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 14.90, N = 3 10624.1 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -fexceptions -fno-rtti -maes -Ofast -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -rdynamic -lssl -lcrypto -luv -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lhwloc
Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 40.43, N = 15 553.0 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High 8 P + HT + 8 E 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 10.90, N = 12 561.17 MIN: 226 / MAX: 1581
Unvanquished Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra 8 P + HT + 8 E 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 16.01, N = 12 383.9
Unvanquished Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Medium 8 P + HT + 8 E 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 17.98, N = 12 371.7
Sysbench Test: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Events Per Second, More Is Better Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 2.25, N = 3 63104.69 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -funroll-loops -O3 -march=native -rdynamic -ldl -laio -lm
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.558 1.116 1.674 2.232 2.79 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 2.48 MIN: 1.95 / MAX: 2.52
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0765 0.153 0.2295 0.306 0.3825 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.34
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0765 0.153 0.2295 0.306 0.3825 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.34
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.4284 0.8568 1.2852 1.7136 2.142 SE +/- 0.020, N = 3 1.904 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq -pie
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 2878.71 MIN: 2870.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 1.27, N = 3 2880.93 MIN: 2871.58 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.96, N = 3 1615.78 MIN: 1610.55 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 1615.76 MIN: 1609.92 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 26.67, N = 3 4956.6 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 45.22, N = 6 4432.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
JPEG XL libjxl Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.27, N = 15 78.37 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -funwind-tables -O2 -pthread -fPIE -pie
Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs / Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 65.1 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Euclidean Cluster OpenBenchmarking.org Test Cases Per Minute, More Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Euclidean Cluster 8 P + HT + 8 E 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 17.52, N = 15 1617.13 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile 8 P + HT + 8 E 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 65.55
Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 23.23, N = 15 270.66 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
oneDNN Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.4609 0.9218 1.3827 1.8436 2.3045 SE +/- 0.11208, N = 15 2.04832 MIN: 1.43 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 8 P + HT + 8 E 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 1645.32, N = 3 278159.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org sign/s, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 8 P + HT + 8 E 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 16.07, N = 3 4272.1 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
NAMD ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.178 0.356 0.534 0.712 0.89 SE +/- 0.00323, N = 3 0.79125
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.53, N = 15 59.90 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 492.55, N = 3 3587.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 31.3 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
Google SynthMark Test: VoiceMark_100 OpenBenchmarking.org Voices, More Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 8 P + HT + 8 E 200 400 600 800 1000 1022.13 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -std=c++11 -Ofast
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 Time To Compile 8 P + HT + 8 E 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.40, N = 3 48.08
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 1.0598 2.1196 3.1794 4.2392 5.299 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 4.71 MIN: 3.6 / MAX: 4.78
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 2.94, N = 4 3522.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Compression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 8.96, N = 4 787.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 220.02, N = 3 12445.7 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 75.37 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 13.84, N = 3 12680.9 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 77.19 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 496.73, N = 3 3500.8 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 42.2 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lz -llzma
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.81, N = 15 89.24 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time 8 P + HT + 8 E 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 36.08 1. RawTherapee, version 5.8, command line.
ASTC Encoder Preset: Exhaustive OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Exhaustive 8 P + HT + 8 E 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 32.75 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -flto -pthread
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Threads: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: 1 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 82.06
Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 1.72, N = 15 24.22 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time 8 P + HT + 8 E 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 32.33
Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 10.65 1. chrome 95.0.4638.54
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 32.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown 8 P + HT + 8 E 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 19.76 MIN: 19.46 / MAX: 20.24
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 6.99 MIN: 5.41 / MAX: 7.14
Tesseract Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 8 P + HT + 8 E 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.41, N = 3 988.51
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Magi OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi 8 P + HT + 8 E 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 557.05 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl 8 P + HT + 8 E 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 21.86, N = 3 13917 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Skeincoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 745.01, N = 3 115290 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: x25x OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x 8 P + HT + 8 E 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 1.16, N = 3 669.24 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits 8 P + HT + 8 E 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 196.50, N = 3 43567 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Deepcoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 17.32, N = 3 14130 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Ringcoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 53.56, N = 3 4028.40 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Garlicoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 8.88, N = 3 2902.28 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Blake-2 S OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S 8 P + HT + 8 E 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 2502.49, N = 3 542007 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 1251.19, N = 3 264873 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite 8 P + HT + 8 E 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 20.82, N = 3 132160 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -lcurl -lz -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto -lgmp
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown 8 P + HT + 8 E 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 21.25 MIN: 20.93 / MAX: 21.83
7-Zip Compression Compress Speed Test OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test 8 P + HT + 8 E 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 682.68, N = 3 97090 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -lpthread
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 39.39, N = 3 13290.5 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 11.01, N = 3 12072.72 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon 8 P + HT + 8 E 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 21.94 MIN: 21.55 / MAX: 22.7
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 22.04 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq -pie
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate 8 P + HT + 8 E 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 5.40, N = 3 452.59 MIN: 78 / MAX: 1269
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.010, N = 3 6.024 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq -pie
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon 8 P + HT + 8 E 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 24.53 MIN: 24.29 / MAX: 25.1
OpenCV Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network 8 P + HT + 8 E 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 80.53, N = 15 5048 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -O3 -march=native -fsigned-char -pthread -fomit-frame-pointer -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fvisibility=hidden -shared
Coremark CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second 8 P + HT + 8 E 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 2264.99, N = 3 724700.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -O3 -march=native -lrt" -lrt
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 28.57 MIN: 23.26
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.26, N = 15 150.85 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: NDT Mapping OpenBenchmarking.org Test Cases Per Minute, More Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: NDT Mapping 8 P + HT + 8 E 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.87, N = 4 1280.03 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -fopenmp
RNNoise OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RNNoise 2020-06-28 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 15.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -pedantic -fvisibility=hidden
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Threads: All OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: All 8 P + HT + 8 E 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 417.81
ET: Legacy Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 8 P + HT + 8 E 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 2.49, N = 4 746.2
WebP Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless OpenBenchmarking.org Encode Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 12.68 1. (CC) gcc options: -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -march=native -lm -ljpeg -lpng16 -ltiff
ET: Legacy Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 8 P + HT + 8 E 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 7.99, N = 4 743.9
JPEG XL libjxl Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.05, N = 5 30.26 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -funwind-tables -O2 -pthread -fPIE -pie
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 2.81, N = 15 205.83 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
oneDNN Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.2851 0.5702 0.8553 1.1404 1.4255 SE +/- 0.00071, N = 4 1.26699 MIN: 1.23 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.21, N = 6 35.51 MIN: 34.48 / MAX: 35.71
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 26.32 MIN: 19.61 / MAX: 27.03
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00204, N = 7 7.13769 MIN: 7.05 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
oneDNN Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00286, N = 7 7.48850 MIN: 7.39 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -std=c++11 -fopenmp -msse4.1 -fPIC -pie -ldl -lpthread
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.37, N = 6 89.22 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq -pie
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 Encoder Speed: 6 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.055, N = 5 8.504 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
ASTC Encoder Preset: Thorough OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 Preset: Thorough 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.0126, N = 6 6.8296 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -march=native -flto -pthread
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 Encoder Speed: 10 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.5666 1.1332 1.6998 2.2664 2.833 SE +/- 0.026, N = 15 2.518 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
SVT-VP9 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 5.68, N = 15 369.28 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -march=native -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.44, N = 9 226.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fPIE -fPIC -O2 -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt
SVT-VP9 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.68, N = 11 369.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -march=native -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
WebP Image Encode Encode Settings: Quality 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Encode Time - Seconds, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.3634 0.7268 1.0902 1.4536 1.817 SE +/- 0.000, N = 11 1.615 1. (CC) gcc options: -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -march=native -lm -ljpeg -lpng16 -ltiff
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 0.39, N = 12 466.33 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fPIE -fPIC -O2 -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.00, N = 12 500 MIN: 250
CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 0 / Avg: 47.4 / Max: 100
CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring 8 P + HT + 8 E 50 100 150 200 250 Min: 2.34 / Avg: 82.91 / Max: 258.28
Meta Performance Per Watts Performance Per Watts OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watts, More Is Better Meta Performance Per Watts Performance Per Watts 8 P + HT + 8 E 110 220 330 440 550 492.37
RNNoise CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 39.7 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RNNoise 2020-06-28 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
RNNoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 24.5 30.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RNNoise 2020-06-28 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
DeepSpeech CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 19.0 30.3 48.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
DeepSpeech CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 36.8 45.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 19.0 23.4 58.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.2 15.5 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 19.0 20.6 55.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 8.4 25.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 19.0 23.2 53.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 14.6 36.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 19.0 24.5 57.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 2.4 22.1 126.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 19.0 24.6 36.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 26.4 38.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs / Minute Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.554 1.108 1.662 2.216 2.77 2.462
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 16 / Avg: 20.69 / Max: 61
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 16 32 48 64 80 Min: 2.34 / Avg: 9.41 / Max: 86.8
Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 6 12 18 24 30 23.47
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 19.0 25.0 54.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 2.6 21.0 40.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 12.74
Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0 25.5 34.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.4 23.9 41.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Sysbench CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 57.0 62.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Sysbench 1.0.20 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Sysbench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 121.7 129.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Sysbench 1.0.20 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Sysbench Test: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Events Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Sysbench 1.0.20 Test: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 110 220 330 440 550 518.59
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 34.5 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 56.3 70.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Points2Image OpenBenchmarking.org Test Cases Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Points2Image 8 P + HT + 8 E 130 260 390 520 650 604.21
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 30.5 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Temperature Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 43.6 69.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: NDT Mapping OpenBenchmarking.org Test Cases Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: NDT Mapping 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 29.33
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 34.7 51.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 51.3 95.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Euclidean Cluster OpenBenchmarking.org Test Cases Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Euclidean Cluster 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 31.50
NCNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 55.8 69.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
NCNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 125.0 168.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NCNN 20210720 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenCV CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 38.9 67.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenCV CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.4 51.6 151.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
OpenCV CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 14 28 42 56 70 Min: 23 / Avg: 42.82 / Max: 73
OpenCV CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 4.07 / Avg: 70.64 / Max: 157.93
OpenCV CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 29.0 49.6 80.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenCV CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 103.5 202.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenCV 4.5.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
ONNX Runtime CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 27 / Avg: 81.34 / Max: 96
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 5.04 / Avg: 157.06 / Max: 184.16
ONNX Runtime Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 31.87
ONNX Runtime CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 13 26 39 52 65 Min: 30 / Avg: 62.97 / Max: 69
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 30 60 90 120 150 Min: 4.64 / Avg: 119.97 / Max: 136.06
ONNX Runtime Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 70 140 210 280 350 335.57
ONNX Runtime CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 30.0 87.7 98.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 173.4 199.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
ONNX Runtime Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.126 0.252 0.378 0.504 0.63 0.56
ONNX Runtime CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 32 / Avg: 85.57 / Max: 100
ONNX Runtime CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 40 80 120 160 200 Min: 4.62 / Avg: 169.18 / Max: 192.99
ONNX Runtime Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Inferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is Better ONNX Runtime 1.9.1 Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.8512 1.7024 2.5536 3.4048 4.256 3.783
PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 27.0 74.0 94.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 182.6 225.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0254 0.0508 0.0762 0.1016 0.127 0.113
PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 20.0 69.0 93.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 168.9 226.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0331 0.0662 0.0993 0.1324 0.1655 0.147
PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 23 / Avg: 40.26 / Max: 62
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 10 20 30 40 50 Min: 4.36 / Avg: 40.99 / Max: 51.53
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0509 0.1018 0.1527 0.2036 0.2545 0.226
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 75.2 84.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 183.6 209.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 75.1 84.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 183.5 209.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 74.4 82.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 184.3 205.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 27.0 73.6 82.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.4 183.6 205.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 27.0 57.0 85.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 120.5 216.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 52.5 72.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 121.0 190.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 26.0 44.1 57.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 81.4 148.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
oneDNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 29.0 49.0 66.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
oneDNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 100.1 188.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better oneDNN 2.1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenSSL CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 87.8 100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 195.0 243.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OpenSSL Algorithm: SHA256 OpenBenchmarking.org byte/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: SHA256 8 P + HT + 8 E 30M 60M 90M 120M 150M 121145527.94
OpenSSL CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 28.0 81.9 90.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenSSL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 180.8 203.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OpenSSL Algorithm: RSA4096 OpenBenchmarking.org verify/s Per Watt, More Is Better OpenSSL 3.0 Algorithm: RSA4096 8 P + HT + 8 E 300 600 900 1200 1500 1538.21
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 59.4 81.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 133.4 212.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits 8 P + HT + 8 E 70 140 210 280 350 326.67
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 28.0 46.3 57.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 88.6 163.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Skeincoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Skeincoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 300 600 900 1200 1500 1301.48
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 73.8 85.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 168.0 204.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Deepcoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Deepcoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 84.10
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 80.0 93.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.2 187.2 222.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Ringcoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Ringcoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 5 10 15 20 25 21.52
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 76.1 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.2 180.4 208.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Garlicoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Garlicoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 16.09
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 82.3 98.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 197.5 239.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: x25x OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: x25x 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.7623 1.5246 2.2869 3.0492 3.8115 3.388
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 28.0 42.1 73.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 73.3 138.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Blake-2 S OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Blake-2 S 8 P + HT + 8 E 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 7393.09
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 28.0 73.3 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 161.4 197.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Magi OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Magi 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.7763 1.5526 2.3289 3.1052 3.8815 3.45
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 57.6 67.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 121.9 151.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl 8 P + HT + 8 E 30 60 90 120 150 114.13
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 43.9 67.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 81.0 112.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite 8 P + HT + 8 E 400 800 1200 1600 2000 1631.71
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 40.7 66.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Cpuminer-Opt CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 73.0 115.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Cpuminer-Opt Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin OpenBenchmarking.org kH/s Per Watt, More Is Better Cpuminer-Opt 3.18 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin 8 P + HT + 8 E 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3629.99
Timed Mesa Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 30.0 69.2 93.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Mesa Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 150.1 224.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Mesa Compilation 21.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 28.0 71.8 93.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 159.6 225.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 73.6 96.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.2 162.6 225.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
LeelaChessZero CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 76.7 90.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LeelaChessZero CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.2 182.4 219.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
LeelaChessZero Backend: Eigen OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: Eigen 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 9.892
LeelaChessZero CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 81.1 98.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LeelaChessZero CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 190.7 246.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
LeelaChessZero Backend: BLAS OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better LeelaChessZero 0.28 Backend: BLAS 8 P + HT + 8 E 1.2886 2.5772 3.8658 5.1544 6.443 5.727
Stockfish CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 80.3 100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Stockfish 13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Stockfish CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 190.3 258.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Stockfish 13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Stockfish Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Stockfish 13 Total Time 8 P + HT + 8 E 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K 253756.27
Google SynthMark CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 25.3 31.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 CPU Temperature Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
Google SynthMark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 17.5 22.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Google SynthMark Test: VoiceMark_100 OpenBenchmarking.org Voices Per Watt, More Is Better Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 8 P + HT + 8 E 13 26 39 52 65 58.45
Coremark CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 63.3 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Coremark 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Coremark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 139.6 188.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Coremark 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Coremark CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second 8 P + HT + 8 E 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 5192.10
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 22.0 40.0 68.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 3.4 72.8 123.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RTLightmap.hdr.4096x4096 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002 0.0025 0.002
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 39.4 69.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.0 71.0 123.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0011 0.0022 0.0033 0.0044 0.0055 0.005
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 40.6 69.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 2.5 72.6 129.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Intel Open Image Denoise Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0 Run: RT.hdr_alb_nrm.3840x2160 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0011 0.0022 0.0033 0.0044 0.0055 0.005
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 81.0 93.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 194.8 233.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0245 0.049 0.0735 0.098 0.1225 0.109
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 74.9 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.1 177.1 210.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0311 0.0622 0.0933 0.1244 0.1555 0.138
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 80.7 94.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 194.8 232.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0227 0.0454 0.0681 0.0908 0.1135 0.101
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 77.0 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 177.2 207.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 3.13 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0279 0.0558 0.0837 0.1116 0.1395 0.124
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 28.0 76.1 88.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.2 181.4 217.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0029 0.0058 0.0087 0.0116 0.0145 0.013
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 51.2 88.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 88.5 232.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0727 0.1454 0.2181 0.2908 0.3635 0.323
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 29.0 79.6 94.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.2 194.4 240.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0081 0.0162 0.0243 0.0324 0.0405 0.036
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 33.0 65.0 89.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 130.3 235.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0614 0.1228 0.1842 0.2456 0.307 0.273
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 33.0 90.2 100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 215.6 242.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0027 0.0054 0.0081 0.0108 0.0135 0.012
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 83.5 98.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 205.1 246.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0052 0.0104 0.0156 0.0208 0.026 0.023
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 31.9 67.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 35.7 158.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 14.00
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 57.8 78.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 132.7 206.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0446 0.0892 0.1338 0.1784 0.223 0.198
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 45.1 73.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 2.4 77.7 108.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0369 0.0738 0.1107 0.1476 0.1845 0.164
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0 40.1 73.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.3 59.5 90.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0396 0.0792 0.1188 0.1584 0.198 0.176
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 44.4 62.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 78.5 119.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.1717 0.3434 0.5151 0.6868 0.8585 0.763
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 34.5 55.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 45.5 107.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.7457 1.4914 2.2371 2.9828 3.7285 3.314
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 40.4 61.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 64.6 107.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.3105 0.621 0.9315 1.242 1.5525 1.38
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 31.9 47.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 41.9 96.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.2 Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 1.1054 2.2108 3.3162 4.4216 5.527 4.913
SVT-VP9 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0 36.9 70.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.3 55.2 194.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-VP9 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 6.7
SVT-VP9 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 35.2 70.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 55.9 196.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-VP9 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 6.612
SVT-HEVC CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 35.1 74.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-HEVC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 51.2 208.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 9.112
SVT-HEVC CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 26.0 47.7 84.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-HEVC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 84.9 227.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.6014 1.2028 1.8042 2.4056 3.007 2.673
SVT-AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 26.0 53.0 88.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 104.5 217.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0041 0.0082 0.0123 0.0164 0.0205 0.018
SVT-AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0 43.9 84.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 87.8 170.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 4 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0155 0.031 0.0465 0.062 0.0775 0.069
SVT-AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 50.9 78.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 105.1 164.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0473 0.0946 0.1419 0.1892 0.2365 0.21
SVT-AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 45.2 69.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 83.1 143.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8.7 Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.2414 0.4828 0.7242 0.9656 1.207 1.073
LibRaw CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 33.4 70.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LibRaw 0.20 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LibRaw CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 43.5 72.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LibRaw 0.20 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LibRaw Post-Processing Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Mpix/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LibRaw 0.20 Post-Processing Benchmark 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.3236 0.6472 0.9708 1.2944 1.618 1.438
RawTherapee CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 48.3 70.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
RawTherapee CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 85.8 132.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RawTherapee CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Hugin CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 40.6 69.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Hugin CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Hugin CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 63.2 160.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Hugin CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 42.6 71.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 69.1 133.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Threads: All OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: All 8 P + HT + 8 E 2 4 6 8 10 6.045
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 33.0 39.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 31.0 35.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
JPEG XL Decoding libjxl CPU Threads: 1 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better JPEG XL Decoding libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Threads: 1 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.596 1.192 1.788 2.384 2.98 2.649
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 21 / Avg: 24.54 / Max: 59
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 P + HT + 8 E 12 24 36 48 60 Min: 4.35 / Avg: 22.18 / Max: 63.18
JPEG XL libjxl Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0072 0.0144 0.0216 0.0288 0.036 0.032
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 22.0 30.1 69.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 36.1 74.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
JPEG XL libjxl Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0549 0.1098 0.1647 0.2196 0.2745 0.244
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 25.2 49.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 18.9 27.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
JPEG XL libjxl Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.3609 0.7218 1.0827 1.4436 1.8045 1.604
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 26.9 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
JPEG XL libjxl CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 23.5 43.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
JPEG XL libjxl Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 OpenBenchmarking.org MP/s Per Watt, More Is Better JPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.7497 1.4994 2.2491 2.9988 3.7485 3.332
WebP Image Encode CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 25.9 28.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
WebP Image Encode CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.4 23.8 34.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
WebP Image Encode CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 27.3 33.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
WebP Image Encode CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.7 14.2 35.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better WebP Image Encode 1.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
ASTC Encoder CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 77.1 96.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 187.3 239.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
ASTC Encoder CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 48.8 82.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 83.2 230.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
libavif avifenc CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 30.7 74.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
libavif avifenc CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.3 25.5 102.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
libavif avifenc CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 70.3 96.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
libavif avifenc CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 154.6 241.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
libavif avifenc CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 28.0 46.7 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
libavif avifenc CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 71.3 225.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
7-Zip Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 63.0 78.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better 7-Zip Compression 16.02 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
7-Zip Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 3.8 138.6 184.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better 7-Zip Compression 16.02 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
7-Zip Compression Compress Speed Test OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS Per Watt, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test 8 P + HT + 8 E 150 300 450 600 750 700.73
LZ4 Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 27.3 29.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 31.7 36.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 90 180 270 360 450 393.01
LZ4 Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 27.4 30.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 31.6 39.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 90 180 270 360 450 401.37
LZ4 Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 27.4 29.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
LZ4 Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 28.3 33.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
LZ4 Compression Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 100 200 300 400 500 469.68
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 37.8 63.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 57.3 122.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 14 28 42 56 70 62.58
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 43.7 62.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.5 61.7 124.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 13 26 39 52 65 56.78
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 37.9 57.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 57.7 122.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 8 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 14 28 42 56 70 61.07
Zstd Compression CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 36.3 65.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Zstd Compression CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 49.3 97.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Zstd Compression Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Zstd Compression 1.5.0 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed 8 P + HT + 8 E 20 40 60 80 100 100.44
Xmrig CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 31.0 80.7 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Xmrig CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 192.0 203.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Xmrig Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M 8 P + HT + 8 E 12 24 36 48 60 55.34
Xmrig CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 69.4 73.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Xmrig CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 161.8 167.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Xmrig Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M OpenBenchmarking.org H/s Per Watt, More Is Better Xmrig 6.12.1 Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M 8 P + HT + 8 E 9 18 27 36 45 38.92
GROMACS CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 32.0 83.7 100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better GROMACS 2021.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
GROMACS CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.4 182.9 213.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GROMACS 2021.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
GROMACS Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare OpenBenchmarking.org Ns Per Day Per Watt, More Is Better GROMACS 2021.2 Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.009
NAMD CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 27.0 87.4 100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
NAMD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 204.1 252.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 50.9 62.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 96.9 137.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
ET: Legacy CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 37.2 57.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
ET: Legacy CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 28.4 40.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
ET: Legacy Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 8 P + HT + 8 E 6 12 18 24 30 26.26
ET: Legacy CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 32.7 57.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
ET: Legacy CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 28.3 43.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
ET: Legacy Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better ET: Legacy 2.78 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 8 P + HT + 8 E 6 12 18 24 30 26.27
Unvanquished CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 24.0 29.1 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Unvanquished CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 28.1 41.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Unvanquished Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 13.66
Unvanquished CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 28.6 53.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Unvanquished CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 28.7 45.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Unvanquished Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 13.13
Unvanquished CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 28.2 51.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Unvanquished CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 27.0 43.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Unvanquished Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Medium 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 13.78
Unvanquished CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 28.0 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Unvanquished CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 26.8 44.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 13.26
Unvanquished CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0 27.8 51.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Unvanquished CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.9 27.7 44.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 13.48
Unvanquished CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 0.0 29.8 55.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Unvanquished CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 5.0 28.7 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Unvanquished Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unvanquished 0.52.1 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Medium 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 14.47
Xonotic CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 25.0 35.4 57.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Xonotic CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 37.5 51.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate 8 P + HT + 8 E 3 6 9 12 15 12.06
Xonotic CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 32.6 58.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Xonotic CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 33.8 51.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 14.96
Xonotic CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 23.0 30.8 54.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Xonotic CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.6 32.8 50.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 14 28 42 56 70
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High 8 P + HT + 8 E 4 8 12 16 20 17.11
Tesseract CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 21.0 31.4 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Tesseract CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max 8 P + HT + 8 E 4.8 33.4 55.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
Tesseract Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 8 P + HT + 8 E 7 14 21 28 35 29.59
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5