AMD EPYC 72F3 8-Core testing with a Supermicro H12SSL-i v1.01 (2.0 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 21.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2104226-IB-UBUNTU21033 Ubuntu 21.04 EPYC - Phoronix Test Suite Ubuntu 21.04 EPYC AMD EPYC 72F3 8-Core testing with a Supermicro H12SSL-i v1.01 (2.0 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 21.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2104226-IB-UBUNTU21033&sor&grs .
Ubuntu 21.04 EPYC Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Vulkan Compiler File-System Screen Resolution AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 8-Core @ 3.70GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads) Supermicro H12SSL-i v1.01 (2.0 BIOS) AMD Starship/Matisse 8 x 16 GB DDR4-3200MT/s 18ASF2G72PDZ-3G2E1 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP ASPEED VE228 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 2-port PCIe Ubuntu 21.04 5.11.0-16-generic (x86_64) GNOME Shell 3.38.4 X Server 1.20.7 1.0.2 GCC 11.0.1 20210413 ext4 1920x1080 1024x768 OpenBenchmarking.org Kernel Details - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise Compiler Details - --disable-multilib --enable-checking=release Processor Details - Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xa001119 Python Details - Python 3.9.4 Security Details - itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: always-on RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Ubuntu 21.04 EPYC askap: tConvolve MPI - Gridding luxcorerender: Rainbow Colors and Prism - CPU askap: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding deepspeech: CPU himeno: Poisson Pressure Solver pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latency cp2k: Fayalite-FIST askap: tConvolve MPI - Degridding x265: Bosphorus 1080p helsing: 12 digit plaidml: No - Inference - VGG19 - CPU luxcorerender: DLSC - CPU openfoam: Motorbike 30M pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latency askap: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding x265: Bosphorus 4K pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon Obj askap: tConvolve MT - Gridding embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Asian Dragon plaidml: No - Inference - ResNet 50 - CPU pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latency toktx: Zstd Compression 19 ospray: NASA Streamlines - Path Tracer pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latency pgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write cloverleaf: Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics svt-vp9: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p avifenc: 6 pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only aom-av1: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Bosphorus 4K luxcorerender: Danish Mood - CPU svt-av1: Enc Mode 0 - 1080p liquid-dsp: 1 - 256 - 57 luxcorerender: LuxCore Benchmark - CPU ospray: NASA Streamlines - SciVis pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only svt-av1: Enc Mode 8 - 1080p aom-av1: Speed 9 Realtime - Bosphorus 4K influxdb: 64 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 keydb: helsing: 14 digit encode-wavpack: WAV To WavPack lammps: Rhodopsin Protein coremark: CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second tensorflow-lite: Mobilenet Float build-wasmer: Time To Compile lammps: 20k Atoms numpy: pybench: Total For Average Test Times ospray: San Miguel - SciVis astcenc: Medium pgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latency simdjson: PartialTweets botan: AES-256 - Decrypt embree: Pathtracer - Crown liquid-dsp: 2 - 256 - 57 build-erlang: Time To Compile svt-vp9: VMAF Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p build-nodejs: Time To Compile botan: Blowfish tensorflow-lite: Inception V4 svt-hevc: 1 - Bosphorus 1080p botan: Blowfish - Decrypt embree: Pathtracer ISPC - Crown tensorflow-lite: NASNet Mobile avifenc: 10 aom-av1: Speed 8 Realtime - Bosphorus 4K svt-hevc: 10 - Bosphorus 1080p askap: tConvolve MT - Degridding tensorflow-lite: SqueezeNet avifenc: 6, Lossless simdjson: Kostya phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suite embree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragon plaidml: No - Inference - VGG16 - CPU toktx: Zstd Compression 9 svt-vp9: Visual Quality Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p tensorflow-lite: Inception ResNet V2 tnn: CPU - MobileNet v2 build-linux-kernel: Time To Compile embree: Pathtracer - Asian Dragon Obj toktx: UASTC 3 + Zstd Compression 19 tensorflow-lite: Mobilenet Quant hmmer: Pfam Database Search simdjson: DistinctUserID svt-av1: Enc Mode 4 - 1080p build-godot: Time To Compile encode-mp3: WAV To MP3 encode-opus: WAV To Opus Encode caffe: AlexNet - CPU - 100 securemark: SecureMark-TLS botan: ChaCha20Poly1305 rnnoise: toktx: UASTC 3 botan: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt liquid-dsp: 4 - 256 - 57 pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write encode-flac: WAV To FLAC oidn: Memorial liquid-dsp: 16 - 256 - 57 pgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latency astcenc: Thorough botan: AES-256 liquid-dsp: 8 - 256 - 57 botan: KASUMI botan: Twofish - Decrypt botan: Twofish svt-hevc: 7 - Bosphorus 1080p aom-av1: Speed 6 Realtime - Bosphorus 4K botan: CAST-256 - Decrypt tnn: CPU - SqueezeNet v1.1 caffe: GoogleNet - CPU - 100 namd: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms toktx: UASTC 4 + Zstd Compression 19 botan: KASUMI - Decrypt astcenc: Exhaustive botan: CAST-256 influxdb: 4 - 10000 - 2,5000,1 - 10000 openvkl: vklBenchmark aom-av1: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Bosphorus 4K aom-av1: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Bosphorus 4K ospray: Magnetic Reconnection - Path Tracer ospray: Magnetic Reconnection - SciVis ospray: XFrog Forest - Path Tracer ospray: San Miguel - Path Tracer ospray: XFrog Forest - SciVis luxcorerender: Orange Juice - CPU simdjson: LargeRand mt-dgemm: Sustained Floating-Point Rate AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 7951.38 6.71 5290.32 67.61087 4474.625633 23815 2.100 1143.528 6349.10 59.27 5.168 11.28 1.89 48.15 1.035 5471.5 11.78 241790 11.9864 5588.40 13.6141 9.75 0.415 17.746 4.24 11.362 22011 30.03 182.92 11.520 241137 7.26 1.24 0.128 68785667 1.41 20.14 231485 35.340 43.56 1673745.3 510311.00 543.044 12.985 6.907 409274.960801 125295 54.173 6.911 440.98 830 14.56 5.1671 0.216 4.31 6379.726 12.1806 137116667 117.524 174.09 396.021 440.172 2717090 8.42 438.477 11.9352 160125 3.002 36.15 255.90 4934.50 190511 49.062 3.39 728523 13.7019 14.02 2.461 137.81 2447280 245.680 89.154 12.6196 16.604 136944 91.254 4.96 4.549 125.825 6.686 7.119 37315 282076 839.414 17.826 11.174 823.610 271970000 25049 6.984 7.76 593143333 3.997 12.5981 6327.682 531100000 98.771 370.218 366.161 121.94 14.69 146.652 243.223 102172 1.95771 310.589 94.853 100.1242 146.674 1424060.5 145 3.85 0.15 166.67 10.53 1.51 1.18 2.81 2.79 1.11 3.573495 8358.57 6.43 5101.66 65.25172 4589.362834 24397 2.050 1118.667 6465.42 58.24 5.257 11.09 1.86 48.84 1.021 5542.45 11.63 244870 12.1326 5522.14 13.7730 9.85 0.411 17.918 4.20 11.469 21809 30.30 181.31 11.619 243193 7.20 1.25 0.129 68262000 1.40 20 233099 35.096 43.86 1662367.2 506884.14 546.632 13.061 6.868 411546.621008 125985 54.445 6.877 443.12 834 14.63 5.1916 0.215 4.33 6408.482 12.1280 136563333 117.065 173.44 397.502 438.570 2726880 8.39 436.947 11.9764 160671 3.012 36.27 255.08 4950.26 191115 49.211 3.38 730648 13.6623 13.98 2.468 137.44 2453380 246.263 89.361 12.5906 16.642 137252 91.052 4.97 4.540 126.070 6.699 7.132 37383 282560 838.024 17.854 11.191 824.760 271593333 25015 6.993 7.77 593886667 4.002 12.6125 6334.440 531646667 98.695 369.938 365.888 121.85 14.70 146.694 243.279 102194 1.95806 310.534 94.844 100.1169 146.678 1424062.0 145 3.85 0.15 166.67 10.53 1.51 1.18 2.81 2.79 1.11 3.291354 OpenBenchmarking.org
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding OpenBenchmarking.org Mpix/sec, More Is Better ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 64.79, N = 5 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 8358.57 7951.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fstrict-aliasing -fopenmp
LuxCoreRender Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 15 6.71 6.43 MIN: 6.39 / MAX: 6.92 MIN: 5.68 / MAX: 6.74
ASKAP Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second, More Is Better ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 34.80, N = 3 SE +/- 51.82, N = 15 5290.32 5101.66 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fstrict-aliasing -fopenmp
DeepSpeech Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.69, N = 3 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 65.25 67.61
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 67.21, N = 15 SE +/- 64.66, N = 15 4589.36 4474.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -mavx2
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 272.45, N = 3 SE +/- 104.83, N = 3 24397 23815 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 0.4725 0.945 1.4175 1.89 2.3625 SE +/- 0.023, N = 3 SE +/- 0.009, N = 3 2.050 2.100 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
CP2K Molecular Dynamics Input: Fayalite-FIST OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.1 Input: Fayalite-FIST EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 200 400 600 800 1000 1118.67 1143.53
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding OpenBenchmarking.org Mpix/sec, More Is Better ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 62.67, N = 5 SE +/- 50.79, N = 3 6465.42 6349.10 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fstrict-aliasing -fopenmp
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 SE +/- 0.30, N = 5 59.27 58.24 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
Helsing Digit Range: 12 digit OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 12 digit AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 1.1828 2.3656 3.5484 4.7312 5.914 5.168 5.257 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread -lcrypto
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 11.28 11.09
LuxCoreRender Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 0.4253 0.8506 1.2759 1.7012 2.1265 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 1.89 1.86 MIN: 1.81 / MAX: 1.96 MIN: 1.79 / MAX: 1.94
OpenFOAM Input: Motorbike 30M OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 48.15 48.84 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -m64 -O3 -ftemplate-depth-100 -fPIC -fuse-ld=bfd -Xlinker --add-needed --no-as-needed -lfiniteVolume -lgenericPatchFields -ldynamicMesh -lmeshTools -lOpenFOAM -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 0.2329 0.4658 0.6987 0.9316 1.1645 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 1.021 1.035 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
ASKAP Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second, More Is Better ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 35.96, N = 15 SE +/- 37.73, N = 3 5542.45 5471.50 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fstrict-aliasing -fopenmp
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 7 11.78 11.63 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 102.95, N = 3 SE +/- 207.21, N = 3 244870 241790 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 12.13 11.99 MIN: 11.99 / MAX: 12.42 MIN: 11.79 / MAX: 12.28
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second, More Is Better ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 21.67, N = 3 SE +/- 64.72, N = 3 5588.40 5522.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fstrict-aliasing -fopenmp
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 13.77 13.61 MIN: 13.57 / MAX: 14.09 MIN: 13.41 / MAX: 13.8
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 9.85 9.75
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 0.0934 0.1868 0.2802 0.3736 0.467 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.411 0.415 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
KTX-Software toktx Settings: Zstd Compression 19 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 Settings: Zstd Compression 19 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 17.75 17.92
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 0.954 1.908 2.862 3.816 4.77 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 4.24 4.20 MIN: 4.13 / MAX: 4.29 MIN: 3.97 / MAX: 4.26
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 11.36 11.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 42.31, N = 3 SE +/- 75.09, N = 3 22011 21809 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 30.03 30.30 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -funroll-loops -fopenmp
SVT-VP9 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 9 182.92 181.31 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 6 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 Encoder Speed: 6 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 11.52 11.62 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 571.75, N = 3 SE +/- 281.80, N = 3 243193 241137 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 7.26 7.20 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm -lpthread
LuxCoreRender Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 0.2813 0.5626 0.8439 1.1252 1.4065 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 4 1.25 1.24 MIN: 0.31 / MAX: 1.58 MIN: 0.31 / MAX: 1.58
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 0.029 0.058 0.087 0.116 0.145 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 SE +/- 0.001, N = 3 0.129 0.128 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
Liquid-DSP Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 15M 30M 45M 60M 75M SE +/- 87563.94, N = 3 SE +/- 573512.28, N = 3 68785667 68262000 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
LuxCoreRender Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 0.3173 0.6346 0.9519 1.2692 1.5865 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.41 1.40 MIN: 0.4 / MAX: 1.74 MIN: 0.4 / MAX: 1.73
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 20.14 20.00 MIN: 19.23 / MAX: 20.83 MIN: 19.23 / MAX: 20.83
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 332.66, N = 3 SE +/- 276.25, N = 3 233099 231485 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 5 35.34 35.10 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.38, N = 12 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 43.86 43.56 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm -lpthread
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 1784.04, N = 3 SE +/- 4165.96, N = 3 1673745.3 1662367.2
KeyDB OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec, More Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 110K 220K 330K 440K 550K SE +/- 258.74, N = 3 SE +/- 1632.83, N = 3 510311.00 506884.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -levent_openssl -levent -lcrypto -lssl -lpthread -lz -lpcre
Helsing Digit Range: 14 digit OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 14 digit AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 120 240 360 480 600 543.04 546.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread -lcrypto
WavPack Audio Encoding WAV To WavPack OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better WavPack Audio Encoding 5.3 WAV To WavPack AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 12.99 13.06 1. (CXX) g++ options: -rdynamic
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: Rhodopsin Protein OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.002, N = 3 SE +/- 0.013, N = 9 6.907 6.868 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lm
Coremark CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 1142.43, N = 3 SE +/- 884.76, N = 3 411546.62 409274.96 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt
TensorFlow Lite Model: Mobilenet Float OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Float AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 40.37, N = 3 SE +/- 102.61, N = 3 125295 125985
Timed Wasmer Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 1.0.2 Time To Compile AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 54.17 54.45 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -pie -nodefaultlibs -ldl -lgcc_s -lutil -lrt -lpthread -lm -lc
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: 20k Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.014, N = 3 SE +/- 0.016, N = 3 6.911 6.877 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread -lm
Numpy Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Numpy Benchmark EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 0.98, N = 3 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 443.12 440.98
PyBench Total For Average Test Times OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 2.08, N = 3 SE +/- 2.40, N = 3 830 834
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 14.63 14.56 MIN: 14.08 / MAX: 15.63 MIN: 14.08 / MAX: 15.63
ASTC Encoder Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.4 Preset: Medium AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 1.1681 2.3362 3.5043 4.6724 5.8405 SE +/- 0.0069, N = 3 SE +/- 0.0025, N = 7 5.1671 5.1916 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -pthread
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 0.0486 0.0972 0.1458 0.1944 0.243 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 SE +/- 0.000, N = 3 0.215 0.216 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
simdjson Throughput Test: PartialTweets OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 Throughput Test: PartialTweets EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 0.9743 1.9486 2.9229 3.8972 4.8715 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 4.33 4.31 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
Botan Test: AES-256 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 16.31, N = 3 SE +/- 5.41, N = 3 6408.48 6379.73 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 12.18 12.13 MIN: 12 / MAX: 12.47 MIN: 11.99 / MAX: 12.37
Liquid-DSP Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 30M 60M 90M 120M 150M SE +/- 61191.87, N = 3 SE +/- 552941.63, N = 3 137116667 136563333 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 23.2 Time To Compile EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 117.07 117.52
SVT-VP9 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 1.17, N = 9 174.09 173.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
Timed Node.js Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 15.11 Time To Compile AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 396.02 397.50
Botan Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.84, N = 3 440.17 438.57 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
TensorFlow Lite Model: Inception V4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception V4 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 342.20, N = 3 SE +/- 212.21, N = 3 2717090 2726880
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 8.42 8.39 1. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O3 -O2 -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt
Botan Test: Blowfish - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.73, N = 3 438.48 436.95 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 11.98 11.94 MIN: 11.46 / MAX: 12.26 MIN: 11.76 / MAX: 12.19
TensorFlow Lite Model: NASNet Mobile OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: NASNet Mobile AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 38.01, N = 3 SE +/- 103.00, N = 3 160125 160671
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 Encoder Speed: 10 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 0.6777 1.3554 2.0331 2.7108 3.3885 SE +/- 0.005, N = 3 SE +/- 0.006, N = 9 3.002 3.012 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 36.27 36.15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm -lpthread
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 10 255.90 255.08 1. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O3 -O2 -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second, More Is Better ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 34.90, N = 3 SE +/- 8.30, N = 3 4950.26 4934.50 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fstrict-aliasing -fopenmp
TensorFlow Lite Model: SqueezeNet OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: SqueezeNet AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 10.60, N = 3 SE +/- 62.38, N = 3 190511 191115
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 49.06 49.21 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
simdjson Throughput Test: Kostya OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 Throughput Test: Kostya AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 0.7628 1.5256 2.2884 3.0512 3.814 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 3.39 3.38 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 160K 320K 480K 640K 800K SE +/- 4873.12, N = 3 SE +/- 2636.91, N = 3 730648 728523
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 13.70 13.66 MIN: 13.54 / MAX: 13.98 MIN: 13.51 / MAX: 13.86
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 6 14.02 13.98
KTX-Software toktx Settings: Zstd Compression 9 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 Settings: Zstd Compression 9 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 0.5553 1.1106 1.6659 2.2212 2.7765 SE +/- 0.002, N = 3 SE +/- 0.002, N = 10 2.461 2.468
SVT-VP9 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 8 137.81 137.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
TensorFlow Lite Model: Inception ResNet V2 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception ResNet V2 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 357.91, N = 3 SE +/- 645.52, N = 3 2447280 2453380
TNN Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 245.68 246.26 MIN: 245.34 / MAX: 251.08 MIN: 245.29 / MAX: 254.35 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -rdynamic -ldl
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.10.20 Time To Compile AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.07, N = 3 SE +/- 1.07, N = 3 89.15 89.36
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 12.62 12.59 MIN: 12.55 / MAX: 12.76 MIN: 12.52 / MAX: 12.74
KTX-Software toktx Settings: UASTC 3 + Zstd Compression 19 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 Settings: UASTC 3 + Zstd Compression 19 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 4 16.60 16.64
TensorFlow Lite Model: Mobilenet Quant OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Quant AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 4.73, N = 3 SE +/- 79.39, N = 3 136944 137252
Timed HMMer Search Pfam Database Search OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed HMMer Search 3.3.1 Pfam Database Search EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 91.05 91.25 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lhmmer -leasel -lm
simdjson Throughput Test: DistinctUserID OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 1.1183 2.2366 3.3549 4.4732 5.5915 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 4.97 4.96 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 1.0235 2.047 3.0705 4.094 5.1175 SE +/- 0.021, N = 3 SE +/- 0.018, N = 3 4.549 4.540 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 125.83 126.07
LAME MP3 Encoding WAV To MP3 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.007, N = 3 SE +/- 0.009, N = 6 6.686 6.699 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fschedule-insns2 -fbranch-count-reg -fforce-addr -pipe -lncurses -lm
Opus Codec Encoding WAV To Opus Encode OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Opus Codec Encoding 1.3.1 WAV To Opus Encode AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.004, N = 5 SE +/- 0.014, N = 6 7.119 7.132 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fvisibility=hidden -logg -lm
Caffe Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Milli-Seconds, Fewer Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 100 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 62.17, N = 3 SE +/- 64.71, N = 3 37315 37383 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -O3 -rdynamic -lglog -lgflags -lprotobuf -lpthread -lsz -lz -ldl -lm -llmdb -lopenblas
SecureMark Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS OpenBenchmarking.org marks, More Is Better SecureMark 1.0.4 Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 1383.28, N = 3 SE +/- 801.00, N = 3 282560 282076 1. (CC) gcc options: -pedantic -O3
Botan Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 SE +/- 0.87, N = 3 839.41 838.02 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
RNNoise OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better RNNoise 2020-06-28 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 17.83 17.85 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pedantic -fvisibility=hidden
KTX-Software toktx Settings: UASTC 3 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 Settings: UASTC 3 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 11.17 11.19
Botan Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 824.76 823.61 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Liquid-DSP Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 60M 120M 180M 240M 300M SE +/- 710093.89, N = 3 SE +/- 1535625.10, N = 3 271970000 271593333 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 314.10, N = 5 SE +/- 423.48, N = 3 25049 25015 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
FLAC Audio Encoding WAV To FLAC OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.006, N = 5 SE +/- 0.005, N = 6 6.984 6.993 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -fvisibility=hidden -logg -lm
Intel Open Image Denoise Scene: Memorial OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 7.77 7.76
Liquid-DSP Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 130M 260M 390M 520M 650M SE +/- 355027.39, N = 3 SE +/- 554416.61, N = 3 593886667 593143333 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
PostgreSQL pgbench Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 0.9005 1.801 2.7015 3.602 4.5025 SE +/- 0.051, N = 5 SE +/- 0.067, N = 3 3.997 4.002 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
ASTC Encoder Preset: Thorough OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.4 Preset: Thorough AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 12.60 12.61 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -pthread
Botan Test: AES-256 OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 1.43, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 6334.44 6327.68 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Liquid-DSP Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 110M 220M 330M 440M 550M SE +/- 2041766.66, N = 3 SE +/- 3074692.40, N = 3 531646667 531100000 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lm -lc -lliquid
Botan Test: KASUMI OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 98.77 98.70 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Twofish - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 370.22 369.94 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
Botan Test: Twofish OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 366.16 365.89 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 7 121.94 121.85 1. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O3 -O2 -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 14.70 14.69 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm -lpthread
Botan Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 146.69 146.65 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
TNN Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 243.22 243.28 MIN: 242.89 / MAX: 243.69 MIN: 242.94 / MAX: 243.92 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -rdynamic -ldl
Caffe Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 100 OpenBenchmarking.org Milli-Seconds, Fewer Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 100 AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 153.26, N = 3 SE +/- 262.46, N = 3 102172 102194 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -O3 -rdynamic -lglog -lgflags -lprotobuf -lpthread -lsz -lz -ldl -lm -llmdb -lopenblas
NAMD ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 0.4406 0.8812 1.3218 1.7624 2.203 SE +/- 0.00064, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00055, N = 3 1.95771 1.95806
KTX-Software toktx Settings: UASTC 4 + Zstd Compression 19 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 Settings: UASTC 4 + Zstd Compression 19 EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 310.53 310.59
Botan Test: KASUMI - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 94.85 94.84 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
ASTC Encoder Preset: Exhaustive OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.4 Preset: Exhaustive EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 100.12 100.12 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -pthread
Botan Test: CAST-256 OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 146.68 146.67 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fstack-protector -m64 -pthread -lbotan-2 -ldl -lrt
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 4799.90, N = 3 SE +/- 3116.00, N = 3 1424062.0 1424060.5
Meta Performance Per Watts Performance Per Watts OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watts, More Is Better Meta Performance Per Watts Performance Per Watts EPYC 72F3 40 80 120 160 200 178.37
OpenVKL Benchmark: vklBenchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Items / Sec, More Is Better OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmark EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 30 60 90 120 150 145 145 MIN: 1 / MAX: 563 MIN: 1 / MAX: 560
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 0.8663 1.7326 2.5989 3.4652 4.3315 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 3.85 3.85 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm -lpthread
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 0.0338 0.0676 0.1014 0.1352 0.169 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.15 0.15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm -lpthread
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.00, N = 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 166.67 166.67 MIN: 142.86 / MAX: 200 MIN: 142.86 / MAX: 200
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 10.53 10.53 MIN: 10 / MAX: 11.11 MIN: 10.31 / MAX: 11.11
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 0.3398 0.6796 1.0194 1.3592 1.699 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.51 1.51 MIN: 1.47 / MAX: 1.53 MIN: 1.49 / MAX: 1.53
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 0.2655 0.531 0.7965 1.062 1.3275 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.18 1.18 MIN: 1.16 / MAX: 1.2 MIN: 1.16 / MAX: 1.19
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 0.6323 1.2646 1.8969 2.5292 3.1615 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 2.81 2.81 MIN: 2.7 / MAX: 2.85 MIN: 2.73 / MAX: 2.85
LuxCoreRender Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 0.6278 1.2556 1.8834 2.5112 3.139 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 2.79 2.79 MIN: 2.73 / MAX: 2.86 MIN: 2.74 / MAX: 2.87
simdjson Throughput Test: LargeRandom OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s, More Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 Throughput Test: LargeRandom EPYC 72F3 AMD EPYC 72F3 0.2498 0.4996 0.7494 0.9992 1.249 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.11 1.11 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pthread
CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring EPYC 72F3 13 26 39 52 65 Min: 34.5 / Avg: 51.16 / Max: 65.25
CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring EPYC 72F3 60 120 180 240 300 Min: 45.74 / Avg: 131.51 / Max: 316.71
InfluxDB CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.8 51.9 62.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
InfluxDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.7 137.2 276.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec Per Watt, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 EPYC 72F3 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K 12118.09
InfluxDB CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.3 50.6 61.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
InfluxDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 50.2 139.5 273.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
InfluxDB Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 OpenBenchmarking.org val/sec Per Watt, More Is Better InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 EPYC 72F3 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 10206.45
WavPack Audio Encoding CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.0 41.3 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better WavPack Audio Encoding 5.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
WavPack Audio Encoding CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.2 93.5 144.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better WavPack Audio Encoding 5.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PHPBench CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.0 41.1 42.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
PHPBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.7 97.0 148.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite EPYC 72F3 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 7535.44
PyBench CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.3 42.3 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
PyBench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 50.7 98.2 146.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 43.0 48.2 58.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 50.4 134.7 210.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU EPYC 72F3 0.0164 0.0328 0.0492 0.0656 0.082 0.073
PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.5 54.8 61.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 50.5 143.1 207.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU EPYC 72F3 0.0176 0.0352 0.0528 0.0704 0.088 0.078
PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.3 53.2 59.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 50.1 144.1 215.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PlaidML CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU EPYC 72F3 0.0218 0.0436 0.0654 0.0872 0.109 0.097
TNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.3 42.2 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
TNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.8 94.7 143.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
TNN CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.3 43.4 45.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
TNN CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.7 101.2 166.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TNN 0.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Caffe CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.5 59.7 64.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Caffe CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.0 171.0 276.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Caffe CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.3 57.3 64.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Caffe CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.4 163.8 280.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Caffe 2020-02-13 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
KTX-Software toktx CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.3 57.4 62.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
KTX-Software toktx CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.3 135.4 163.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
KTX-Software toktx CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 38.8 45.0 58.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
KTX-Software toktx CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.7 100.4 178.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
KTX-Software toktx CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 38.8 40.7 42.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
KTX-Software toktx CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.3 96.6 144.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
KTX-Software toktx CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.0 40.6 42.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
KTX-Software toktx CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.1 84.9 141.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
KTX-Software toktx CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.3 47.6 60.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
KTX-Software toktx CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.8 98.3 183.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better KTX-Software toktx 4.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
ASTC Encoder CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.3 56.6 63.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.1 136.8 171.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
ASTC Encoder CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.3 47.0 60.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.5 108.4 158.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
ASTC Encoder CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.3 43.0 59.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
ASTC Encoder CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.8 96.3 255.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
PostgreSQL pgbench CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.3 45.8 54.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
PostgreSQL pgbench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.6 122.1 316.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
PostgreSQL pgbench CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.0 46.2 58.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
PostgreSQL pgbench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.0 119.1 316.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
PostgreSQL pgbench CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.5 46.1 55.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
PostgreSQL pgbench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.2 125.1 302.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
PostgreSQL pgbench CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.5 46.2 55.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
PostgreSQL pgbench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.9 112.0 210.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
PostgreSQL pgbench CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.3 46.8 56.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
PostgreSQL pgbench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.1 115.5 214.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
PostgreSQL pgbench CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.8 48.3 59.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
PostgreSQL pgbench CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.2 121.5 310.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 80 160 240 320 400
TensorFlow Lite CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.0 58.7 62.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.2 137.9 169.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
TensorFlow Lite CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.0 56.3 62.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.9 123.9 149.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
TensorFlow Lite CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.5 56.6 62.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.6 131.7 165.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
TensorFlow Lite CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.0 58.6 63.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.4 137.3 177.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
TensorFlow Lite CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.8 58.6 62.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 50.1 141.0 171.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
TensorFlow Lite CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 44.0 57.8 63.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
TensorFlow Lite CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.4 132.9 189.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
KeyDB CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.5 50.7 56.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
KeyDB CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.7 136.4 249.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
KeyDB OpenBenchmarking.org Ops/sec Per Watt, More Is Better KeyDB 6.0.16 EPYC 72F3 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3716.95
ASKAP CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.3 43.5 52.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ASKAP 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
ASKAP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 46.6 105.3 201.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASKAP 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
ASKAP Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding EPYC 72F3 12 24 36 48 60 52.62
ASKAP CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.0 50.1 57.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ASKAP 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
ASKAP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.6 144.4 273.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASKAP 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding OpenBenchmarking.org Mpix/sec Per Watt, More Is Better ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding EPYC 72F3 13 26 39 52 65 57.89
ASKAP CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.3 45.0 56.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ASKAP 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
ASKAP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.3 109.9 179.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ASKAP 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
ASKAP Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding OpenBenchmarking.org Million Grid Points Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding EPYC 72F3 10 20 30 40 50 45.05
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.3 53.0 63.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.0 117.3 156.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Liquid-DSP Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 16 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 EPYC 72F3 1.1M 2.2M 3.3M 4.4M 5.5M 5060872.73
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.3 55.4 61.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.4 154.0 239.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Liquid-DSP Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 8 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 EPYC 72F3 700K 1400K 2100K 2800K 3500K 3451252.35
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 38.8 46.4 59.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.5 120.2 188.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Liquid-DSP Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 4 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 EPYC 72F3 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K 2259077.56
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 38.5 41.1 42.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.4 109.0 165.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Liquid-DSP Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 2 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 EPYC 72F3 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K 1252576.32
Liquid-DSP CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 38.8 40.3 41.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Liquid-DSP CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.4 98.3 149.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Liquid-DSP Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 OpenBenchmarking.org samples/s Per Watt, More Is Better Liquid-DSP 2021.01.31 Threads: 1 - Buffer Length: 256 - Filter Length: 57 EPYC 72F3 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K 694569.55
SecureMark CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.8 41.8 43.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SecureMark 1.0.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
SecureMark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.6 100.8 146.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SecureMark 1.0.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
SecureMark Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS OpenBenchmarking.org marks Per Watt, More Is Better SecureMark 1.0.4 Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS EPYC 72F3 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 2803.59
RNNoise CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.5 42.4 43.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better RNNoise 2020-06-28 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
RNNoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 50.2 94.1 142.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better RNNoise 2020-06-28 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Helsing CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.3 60.2 63.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Helsing CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.2 151.2 185.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Helsing 1.0-beta CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Opus Codec Encoding CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.3 41.1 43.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Opus Codec Encoding 1.3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Opus Codec Encoding CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.3 91.0 145.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Opus Codec Encoding 1.3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
LAME MP3 Encoding CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.8 42.9 55.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
LAME MP3 Encoding CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.6 91.5 148.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
FLAC Audio Encoding CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 38.8 43.8 55.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
FLAC Audio Encoding CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.5 92.5 153.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
DeepSpeech CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.3 47.0 54.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
DeepSpeech CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.9 124.8 188.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better DeepSpeech 0.6 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Timed Wasmer Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.8 55.9 63.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 1.0.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Wasmer Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.9 142.3 252.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Wasmer Compilation 1.0.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 38.8 49.8 62.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 23.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 51.8 130.7 281.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Erlang/OTP Compilation 23.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Numpy Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.3 45.9 58.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Numpy Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 50.9 103.5 172.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Numpy Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Numpy Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Numpy Benchmark EPYC 72F3 0.963 1.926 2.889 3.852 4.815 4.28
Timed Node.js Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 43.3 57.5 65.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 15.11 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Node.js Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.4 153.2 207.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Node.js Compilation 15.11 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.3 56.2 64.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.10.20 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 50.2 149.0 246.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.10.20 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.5 54.8 64.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 51.1 146.6 287.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
libavif avifenc CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 38.3 56.0 63.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
libavif avifenc CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 46.9 140.2 254.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
libavif avifenc CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 38.8 41.5 58.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
libavif avifenc CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.9 94.8 203.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
libavif avifenc CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.0 47.0 61.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
libavif avifenc CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.5 115.9 223.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
Himeno Benchmark CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.3 44.6 56.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Himeno Benchmark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.1 102.9 154.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS Per Watt, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver EPYC 72F3 10 20 30 40 50 44.61
Coremark CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.0 50.4 61.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Coremark 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Coremark CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.0 106.6 150.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Coremark 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Coremark CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations/Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second EPYC 72F3 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 3860.53
OpenVKL CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.8 50.2 63.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 0.9 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenVKL CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 46.4 129.9 247.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenVKL 0.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OpenVKL Benchmark: vklBenchmark OpenBenchmarking.org Items / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmark EPYC 72F3 0.2511 0.5022 0.7533 1.0044 1.2555 1.116
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 44.3 56.9 63.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Intel Open Image Denoise CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 52.0 160.6 252.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Intel Open Image Denoise Scene: Memorial OpenBenchmarking.org Images / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial EPYC 72F3 0.0108 0.0216 0.0324 0.0432 0.054 0.048
ACES DGEMM CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.3 50.7 57.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
ACES DGEMM CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.9 140.4 264.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
ACES DGEMM Sustained Floating-Point Rate OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s Per Watt, More Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate EPYC 72F3 0.0052 0.0104 0.0156 0.0208 0.026 0.023
x265 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.8 50.7 61.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better x265 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
x265 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.2 131.9 269.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better x265 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p EPYC 72F3 0.0992 0.1984 0.2976 0.3968 0.496 0.441
x265 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.5 51.6 63.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better x265 3.4 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
x265 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.3 140.4 286.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better x265 3.4 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
x265 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 72F3 0.0187 0.0374 0.0561 0.0748 0.0935 0.083
SVT-VP9 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.3 46.8 55.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 15 30 45 60 75
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.0 113.3 168.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-VP9 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p EPYC 72F3 0.2729 0.5458 0.8187 1.0916 1.3645 1.213
SVT-VP9 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.0 45.0 58.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.8 105.2 173.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-VP9 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p EPYC 72F3 0.3879 0.7758 1.1637 1.5516 1.9395 1.724
SVT-VP9 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.8 44.8 57.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
SVT-VP9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.5 105.9 163.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-VP9 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-VP9 0.3 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p EPYC 72F3 0.3683 0.7366 1.1049 1.4732 1.8415 1.637
SVT-HEVC CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.0 43.4 56.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
SVT-HEVC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.2 94.8 231.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p EPYC 72F3 0.6053 1.2106 1.8159 2.4212 3.0265 2.69
SVT-HEVC CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.8 45.3 58.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
SVT-HEVC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.4 104.6 181.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p EPYC 72F3 0.2621 0.5242 0.7863 1.0484 1.3105 1.165
SVT-HEVC CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.8 53.3 63.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-HEVC CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 51.7 136.9 166.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
SVT-HEVC Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-HEVC 1.5.0 Tuning: 1 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p EPYC 72F3 0.0137 0.0274 0.0411 0.0548 0.0685 0.061
SVT-AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.8 49.2 61.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 50.0 118.8 243.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p EPYC 72F3 0.0664 0.1328 0.1992 0.2656 0.332 0.295
SVT-AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.0 51.5 61.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.7 126.0 207.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p EPYC 72F3 0.0081 0.0162 0.0243 0.0324 0.0405 0.036
SVT-AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.3 51.3 63.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SVT-AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 50.6 126.5 244.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p EPYC 72F3 0.0002 0.0004 0.0006 0.0008 0.001 0.001
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.8 50.4 59.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.5 125.1 187.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj EPYC 72F3 0.0218 0.0436 0.0654 0.0872 0.109 0.097
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.8 53.8 59.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 51.8 137.1 179.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon EPYC 72F3 0.0225 0.045 0.0675 0.09 0.1125 0.1
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 43.0 50.5 60.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.7 123.5 184.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj EPYC 72F3 0.023 0.046 0.069 0.092 0.115 0.102
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 43.0 53.6 61.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.0 137.0 183.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon EPYC 72F3 0.0225 0.045 0.0675 0.09 0.1125 0.1
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.8 56.2 62.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 50.5 150.3 258.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Embree Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown EPYC 72F3 0.018 0.036 0.054 0.072 0.09 0.08
Embree CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 43.0 54.5 61.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.9.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Embree CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 50.6 142.0 268.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Embree 3.9.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Embree Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown EPYC 72F3 0.0191 0.0382 0.0573 0.0764 0.0955 0.085
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.8 49.6 59.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.9 130.0 244.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 72F3 0.0758 0.1516 0.2274 0.3032 0.379 0.337
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.5 49.0 58.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.8 132.8 247.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 72F3 0.0614 0.1228 0.1842 0.2456 0.307 0.273
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 43.0 54.5 63.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.6 144.7 269.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 72F3 0.0113 0.0226 0.0339 0.0452 0.0565 0.05
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.8 53.2 60.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.3 140.6 275.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 72F3 0.0236 0.0472 0.0708 0.0944 0.118 0.105
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.3 55.5 64.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.7 142.2 272.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 72F3 0.0061 0.0122 0.0183 0.0244 0.0305 0.027
AOM AV1 CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.3 53.3 65.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
AOM AV1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 51.0 135.3 262.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
AOM AV1 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better AOM AV1 3.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass - Input: Bosphorus 4K EPYC 72F3 0.0002 0.0004 0.0006 0.0008 0.001 0.001
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.3 46.0 56.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.4 101.7 236.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 72F3 0.3686 0.7372 1.1058 1.4744 1.843 1.638
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 43.0 56.0 62.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.2 137.3 185.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 72F3 0.007 0.014 0.021 0.028 0.035 0.031
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.8 52.0 59.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.0 123.3 233.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis EPYC 72F3 0.0191 0.0382 0.0573 0.0764 0.0955 0.085
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.5 58.7 64.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.8 149.0 193.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 72F3 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 43.8 50.7 61.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.2 115.3 185.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OSPray Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis EPYC 72F3 0.0389 0.0778 0.1167 0.1556 0.1945 0.173
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 43.0 54.3 61.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.0 136.6 211.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer EPYC 72F3 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.009
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.3 57.2 63.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.2 143.0 189.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OSPray Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis EPYC 72F3 0.0045 0.009 0.0135 0.018 0.0225 0.02
OSPray CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.8 46.2 59.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
OSPray CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.0 112.6 197.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
OSPray Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis EPYC 72F3 0.0293 0.0586 0.0879 0.1172 0.1465 0.13
LuxCoreRender CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.5 52.4 61.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LuxCoreRender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.7 113.9 188.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
LuxCoreRender Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 72F3 0.0126 0.0252 0.0378 0.0504 0.063 0.056
LuxCoreRender CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 43.0 55.8 63.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LuxCoreRender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.9 131.2 196.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
LuxCoreRender Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 72F3 0.0025 0.005 0.0075 0.01 0.0125 0.011
LuxCoreRender CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.3 54.7 62.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LuxCoreRender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 50.4 130.3 235.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
LuxCoreRender Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 72F3 0.0047 0.0094 0.0141 0.0188 0.0235 0.021
LuxCoreRender CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.5 54.9 61.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LuxCoreRender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.6 130.8 173.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
LuxCoreRender Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 72F3 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01
LuxCoreRender CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.0 55.9 62.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
LuxCoreRender CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.4 132.9 189.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
LuxCoreRender Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org M samples/sec Per Watt, More Is Better LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU EPYC 72F3 0.0032 0.0064 0.0096 0.0128 0.016 0.014
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.8 45.4 56.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Botan CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.6 99.2 145.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Botan Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt EPYC 72F3 2 4 6 8 10 8.317
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.0 42.6 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Botan CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.2 96.7 144.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Botan Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt EPYC 72F3 0.3413 0.6826 1.0239 1.3652 1.7065 1.517
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.8 41.4 43.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Botan CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.2 98.2 146.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Botan Test: Blowfish - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt EPYC 72F3 1.0017 2.0034 3.0051 4.0068 5.0085 4.452
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.0 42.7 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Botan CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 51.4 98.0 144.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Botan Test: Twofish - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt EPYC 72F3 0.8498 1.6996 2.5494 3.3992 4.249 3.777
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.3 43.3 44.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Botan CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.5 96.9 145.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Botan Test: AES-256 - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt EPYC 72F3 15 30 45 60 75 66.15
Botan CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.3 42.5 44.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Botan CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.5 96.9 145.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Botan 2.17.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
Botan Test: KASUMI - Decrypt OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s Per Watt, More Is Better Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt EPYC 72F3 0.2203 0.4406 0.6609 0.8812 1.1015 0.979
simdjson CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 39.5 41.7 43.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.0 102.0 151.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: DistinctUserID OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID EPYC 72F3 0.011 0.022 0.033 0.044 0.055 0.049
simdjson CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.3 43.4 44.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.1 102.6 150.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 40 80 120 160 200
simdjson Throughput Test: PartialTweets OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 Throughput Test: PartialTweets EPYC 72F3 0.0095 0.019 0.0285 0.038 0.0475 0.042
simdjson CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.5 43.6 46.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.4 116.5 174.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
simdjson Throughput Test: LargeRandom OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 Throughput Test: LargeRandom EPYC 72F3 0.0023 0.0046 0.0069 0.0092 0.0115 0.01
simdjson CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 40.8 43.4 45.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
simdjson CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.8 119.3 177.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
simdjson Throughput Test: Kostya OpenBenchmarking.org GB/s Per Watt, More Is Better simdjson 0.8.2 Throughput Test: Kostya EPYC 72F3 0.0063 0.0126 0.0189 0.0252 0.0315 0.028
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.3 48.6 58.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.0 112.4 235.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 60 120 180 240 300
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: Rhodopsin Protein OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein EPYC 72F3 0.0137 0.0274 0.0411 0.0548 0.0685 0.061
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 CPU Temperature Monitor EPYC 72F3 13 26 39 52 65 Min: 42.5 / Avg: 60.52 / Max: 64
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 CPU Power Consumption Monitor EPYC 72F3 50 100 150 200 250 Min: 49.53 / Avg: 178.15 / Max: 265.61
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Model: 20k Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org ns/day Per Watt, More Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms EPYC 72F3 0.0088 0.0176 0.0264 0.0352 0.044 0.039
OpenFOAM CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.5 57.1 64.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenFOAM CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.2 163.3 260.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenFOAM 8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
Timed HMMer Search CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.3 46.5 58.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Timed HMMer Search 3.3.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Timed HMMer Search CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.0 109.6 172.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Timed HMMer Search 3.3.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
NAMD CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 42.5 58.4 64.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
NAMD CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 48.4 142.8 162.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
CP2K Molecular Dynamics CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 41.5 56.3 64.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
CP2K Molecular Dynamics CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 49.3 157.0 294.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 70 140 210 280 350
CloverLeaf CPU Temperature Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 34.5 47.9 59.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better CloverLeaf CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
CloverLeaf CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max EPYC 72F3 47.8 126.1 172.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better CloverLeaf CPU Power Consumption Monitor 50 100 150 200 250
ACES DGEMM Sustained Floating-Point Rate OpenBenchmarking.org GFLOP/s, More Is Better ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate AMD EPYC 72F3 EPYC 72F3 0.804 1.608 2.412 3.216 4.02 SE +/- 0.062739, N = 13 SE +/- 0.021694, N = 3 3.573495 3.291354 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -fopenmp
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4