AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core testing with a MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2008290-SYST-LINUX5962 Linux 5.9 Frequency Scaling - Phoronix Test Suite Linux 5.9 Frequency Scaling AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core testing with a MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2008290-SYST-LINUX5962&rdt .
Linux 5.9 Frequency Scaling Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads) MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS) AMD Starship/Matisse 16GB 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002 AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz) AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio ASUS MG28U Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 Ubuntu 20.04 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200827-generic (x86_64) 20200826 GNOME Shell 3.36.4 X Server 1.20.8 amdgpu 19.1.0 4.6 Mesa 20.3.0-devel (git-31f75aa 2020-08-28 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 10.0.1) GCC 9.3.0 ext4 3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v Processor Details - CPUFreq Ondemand: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand - CPU Microcode: 0x8701021 - CPUFreq Powersave: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq powersave - CPU Microcode: 0x8701021 - CPUFreq Performance: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq performance - CPU Microcode: 0x8701021 - CPUFreq Schedutil: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil - CPU Microcode: 0x8701021 Graphics Details - GLAMOR Python Details - Python 3.8.2 Security Details - itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Linux 5.9 Frequency Scaling tesseract: 3840 x 2160 xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Low xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - High xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultra xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimate paraview: Many Spheres - 3840 x 2160 paraview: Many Spheres - 3840 x 2160 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 3840 x 2160 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 3840 x 2160 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 3840 x 2160 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 3840 x 2160 wireguard: namd: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms polyhedron: ac polyhedron: linpk polyhedron: protein tscp: AI Chess Performance dav1d: Summer Nature 4K dav1d: Summer Nature 1080p svt-av1: Enc Mode 4 - 1080p svt-av1: Enc Mode 8 - 1080p vpxenc: Speed 0 vpxenc: Speed 5 x264: H.264 Video Encoding x265: H.265 1080p Video Encoding avifenc: 0 avifenc: 2 avifenc: 8 avifenc: 10 build-linux-kernel: Time To Compile build-llvm: Time To Compile c-ray: Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel opm: Flow MPI Norne - 8 opm: Flow MPI Norne - 12 encode-flac: WAV To FLAC encode-mp3: WAV To MP3 tensorflow-lite: Inception V4 tensorflow-lite: Mobilenet Quant tensorflow-lite: Inception ResNet V2 astcenc: Thorough astcenc: Exhaustive hugin: Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time ocrmypdf: Processing 60 Page PDF Document v-ray: CPU blender: BMW27 - CPU-Only pyperformance: regex_compile pyperformance: python_startup geekbench: CPU Multi Core geekbench: CPU Multi Core - Gaussian Blur geekbench: CPU Multi Core - Face Detection geekbench: CPU Multi Core - Horizon Detection geekbench: CPU Single Core geekbench: CPU Single Core - Gaussian Blur geekbench: CPU Single Core - Face Detection geekbench: CPU Single Core - Horizon Detection selenium: Kraken - Firefox selenium: CanvasMark - Firefox selenium: StyleBench - Firefox selenium: Maze Solver - Firefox selenium: Speedometer - Firefox selenium: Kraken - Google Chrome selenium: PSPDFKit WASM - Firefox selenium: CanvasMark - Google Chrome selenium: StyleBench - Google Chrome selenium: Maze Solver - Google Chrome selenium: Speedometer - Google Chrome selenium: PSPDFKit WASM - Google Chrome selenium: WASM imageConvolute - Firefox selenium: WASM collisionDetection - Firefox selenium: WASM imageConvolute - Google Chrome selenium: WASM collisionDetection - Google Chrome tesseract-ocr: Time To OCR 7 Images CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 315.7819 484.6065394 304.0181918 276.4127583 237.5088647 37.23 3732.439 137.98 2207.621 149.95 1562.656 194.383 1.48719 5.82 3.16 12.05 1421630 198.57 543.61 4.538 36.863 7.70 25.95 140.66 62.17 66.340 40.178 4.516 4.327 56.227 438.278 41.904 229.008 303.315 7.584 6.902 1953663 94295.5 1758000 17.52 138.85 43.837 20.883 21642 108.91 152 8.09 11365 794.7 137.6 240.2 1440 88.6 11.6 33.2 732.6 13599 85.4 4.4 103 688.6 1298 22145 36.52 4.3 143 1309 26.3 356.6 27.180 272.8490 22.788 280.3981 296.3140651 216.5365450 197.7253891 171.9007646 36.92 3701.444 134.31 2148.902 148.30 1545.488 310.315 2.62037 11.53 3.74 24.51 667132 147.27 409.08 2.595 21.399 4.33 15.96 81.36 38.44 124.552 74.925 8.378 8.096 97.439 711.993 76.680 371.592 508.165 14.975 14.031 3562533 173472 3204470 31.95 252.14 81.642 38.71 12637 195.75 311 12.6 7746 455.4 74.7 192.3 724 44.2 5.72 16.8 1352.6 8478 62.5 4.7 54.50 1286.5 2365 13518 20.56 4.7 76.89 2456 52.8 718.1 54.5742 555.0065 42.684 340.8102 507.3093203 355.7423767 322.5801219 261.7768321 37.29 3738.390 165.70 2651.187 150.20 1565.254 188.869 1.49139 5.8 3.14 12.03 1341574 206.13 692.69 4.596 38.165 8.17 29.40 147.14 69.36 66.173 40.108 4.507 4.385 55.548 430.400 41.933 228.976 304.270 7.528 7.037 1952597 94728.2 1757590 17.51 138.91 43.612 20.392 21587 109.57 154 6.43 11375 793.0 135.2 242.5 1444 88.6 11.7 33.6 694.6 13841 101 4 105.5 657.2 1234 38.7 3.7 148.2 1304 25.7 360.1 27.3635 280.4287 22.546 291.6465 499.8553627 340.8627258 312.7655160 255.4396536 37.49 3758.793 154.43 2470.882 150.61 1569.490 194.825 1.48668 5.78 3.17 11.79 1394766 198.31 451.11 4.558 36.988 8.14 28.71 129.99 43.71 66.645 39.873 4.573 4.333 56.919 423.246 41.984 230.195 304.214 7.661 6.877 1949273 94400.8 1754397 17.48 138.82 44.161 20.434 21664 108.89 154 12.5 11207 741.8 139.4 242.0 1405 86.4 11.5 32.6 704.4 79.3 4.7 102 683.5 1391 21339 39.1 4.7 139 1346 25.2 348.3 27.1755 273.8042 22.509 OpenBenchmarking.org
Tesseract Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.75, N = 3 SE +/- 1.26, N = 3 SE +/- 2.71, N = 3 SE +/- 2.36, N = 3 315.78 280.40 340.81 291.65
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Low OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Low CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 2.34, N = 3 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 SE +/- 1.97, N = 3 SE +/- 3.12, N = 3 484.61 296.31 507.31 499.86 MIN: 304 / MAX: 1145 MIN: 184 / MAX: 597 MIN: 326 / MAX: 1174 MIN: 313 / MAX: 1113
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.98, N = 3 SE +/- 0.50, N = 3 SE +/- 3.03, N = 3 SE +/- 1.03, N = 3 304.02 216.54 355.74 340.86 MIN: 166 / MAX: 698 MIN: 145 / MAX: 580 MIN: 199 / MAX: 696 MIN: 165 / MAX: 703
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.58, N = 3 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 SE +/- 2.05, N = 3 SE +/- 1.96, N = 3 276.41 197.73 322.58 312.77 MIN: 157 / MAX: 614 MIN: 132 / MAX: 496 MIN: 200 / MAX: 614 MIN: 171 / MAX: 616
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.83, N = 3 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 SE +/- 0.87, N = 3 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 237.51 171.90 261.78 255.44 MIN: 51 / MAX: 514 MIN: 34 / MAX: 452 MIN: 52 / MAX: 510 MIN: 54 / MAX: 505
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 37.23 36.92 37.29 37.49
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 6.34, N = 3 SE +/- 25.66, N = 3 SE +/- 3.75, N = 3 SE +/- 6.99, N = 3 3732.44 3701.44 3738.39 3758.79
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.31, N = 15 SE +/- 1.62, N = 3 SE +/- 1.98, N = 3 SE +/- 2.49, N = 15 137.98 134.31 165.70 154.43
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 20.89, N = 15 SE +/- 25.89, N = 3 SE +/- 31.72, N = 3 SE +/- 39.81, N = 15 2207.62 2148.90 2651.19 2470.88
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.62, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.90, N = 3 SE +/- 2.38, N = 3 149.95 148.30 150.20 150.61
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 16.87, N = 3 SE +/- 0.82, N = 3 SE +/- 9.35, N = 3 SE +/- 24.82, N = 3 1562.66 1545.49 1565.25 1569.49
WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.05, N = 3 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 SE +/- 1.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.97, N = 3 194.38 310.32 188.87 194.83
NAMD ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms OpenBenchmarking.org days/ns, Fewer Is Better NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.5896 1.1792 1.7688 2.3584 2.948 SE +/- 0.00164, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00069, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00348, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00146, N = 3 1.48719 2.62037 1.49139 1.48668
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 5.82 11.53 5.80 5.78
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 0.8415 1.683 2.5245 3.366 4.2075 3.16 3.74 3.14 3.17
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 6 12 18 24 30 12.05 24.51 12.03 11.79
TSCP AI Chess Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 15499.14, N = 7 SE +/- 1132.89, N = 5 SE +/- 16763.32, N = 5 SE +/- 11565.31, N = 5 1421630 667132 1341574 1394766 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 4K OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 198.57 147.27 206.13 198.31 MIN: 161.48 / MAX: 209.2 MIN: 129.26 / MAX: 167 MIN: 168.9 / MAX: 216.32 MIN: 157.93 / MAX: 211.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
dav1d Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 3.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 SE +/- 2.39, N = 3 SE +/- 1.27, N = 3 543.61 409.08 692.69 451.11 MIN: 411.53 / MAX: 591.8 MIN: 318.68 / MAX: 449.05 MIN: 522.93 / MAX: 750.62 MIN: 339.95 / MAX: 493.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.0341 2.0682 3.1023 4.1364 5.1705 SE +/- 0.012, N = 3 SE +/- 0.002, N = 3 SE +/- 0.004, N = 3 SE +/- 0.002, N = 3 4.538 2.595 4.596 4.558 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
SVT-AV1 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 36.86 21.40 38.17 36.99 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -pie
VP9 libvpx Encoding Speed: Speed 0 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 0 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 7.70 4.33 8.17 8.14 1. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -fPIC -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -std=c++11
VP9 libvpx Encoding Speed: Speed 5 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 5 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 25.95 15.96 29.40 28.71 1. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -fPIC -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -std=c++11
x264 H.264 Video Encoding OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.74, N = 5 SE +/- 0.78, N = 3 SE +/- 2.14, N = 4 SE +/- 2.18, N = 3 140.66 81.36 147.14 129.99 1. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -lavformat -lavcodec -lavutil -lswscale -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -ffast-math -std=gnu99 -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-vectorize
x265 H.265 1080p Video Encoding OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x265 3.1.2 H.265 1080p Video Encoding CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 62.17 38.44 69.36 43.71 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lnuma
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 0 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 0 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 66.34 124.55 66.17 66.65 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 2 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 2 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 40.18 74.93 40.11 39.87 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 8 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.042, N = 3 SE +/- 0.019, N = 3 SE +/- 0.019, N = 3 SE +/- 0.034, N = 3 4.516 8.378 4.507 4.573 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC
libavif avifenc Encoder Speed: 10 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 10 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.033, N = 3 SE +/- 0.007, N = 3 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 SE +/- 0.022, N = 3 4.327 8.096 4.385 4.333 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 56.23 97.44 55.55 56.92
Timed LLVM Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 2.40, N = 3 SE +/- 2.68, N = 3 SE +/- 4.94, N = 3 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 438.28 711.99 430.40 423.25
C-Ray Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 41.90 76.68 41.93 41.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3
Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 8 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 8 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 229.01 371.59 228.98 230.20 1. flow 2020.04
Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 12 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 12 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.49, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 303.32 508.17 304.27 304.21 1. flow 2020.04
FLAC Audio Encoding WAV To FLAC OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.026, N = 5 SE +/- 0.005, N = 5 SE +/- 0.025, N = 5 SE +/- 0.029, N = 5 7.584 14.975 7.528 7.661 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -fvisibility=hidden -logg -lm
LAME MP3 Encoding WAV To MP3 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.105, N = 3 SE +/- 0.013, N = 3 SE +/- 0.068, N = 3 SE +/- 0.085, N = 3 6.902 14.031 7.037 6.877 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fschedule-insns2 -fbranch-count-reg -fforce-addr -pipe -lncurses -lm
TensorFlow Lite Model: Inception V4 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception V4 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 800K 1600K 2400K 3200K 4000K SE +/- 4509.99, N = 3 SE +/- 671.13, N = 3 SE +/- 4943.22, N = 3 SE +/- 4754.08, N = 3 1953663 3562533 1952597 1949273
TensorFlow Lite Model: Mobilenet Quant OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Quant CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 86.35, N = 3 SE +/- 3.71, N = 3 SE +/- 102.08, N = 3 SE +/- 12.59, N = 3 94295.5 173472.0 94728.2 94400.8
TensorFlow Lite Model: Inception ResNet V2 OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception ResNet V2 CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 700K 1400K 2100K 2800K 3500K SE +/- 851.25, N = 3 SE +/- 242.49, N = 3 SE +/- 870.88, N = 3 SE +/- 1265.02, N = 3 1758000 3204470 1757590 1754397
ASTC Encoder Preset: Thorough OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Thorough CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 17.52 31.95 17.51 17.48 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++14 -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -flto -mfpmath=sse -mavx2 -mpopcnt -lpthread
ASTC Encoder Preset: Exhaustive OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Exhaustive CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 138.85 252.14 138.91 138.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++14 -fvisibility=hidden -O3 -flto -mfpmath=sse -mavx2 -mpopcnt -lpthread
Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 43.84 81.64 43.61 44.16
OCRMyPDF Processing 60 Page PDF Document OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better OCRMyPDF 9.6.0+dfsg Processing 60 Page PDF Document CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 20.88 38.71 20.39 20.43
Chaos Group V-RAY Mode: CPU OpenBenchmarking.org Ksamples, More Is Better Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 42.45, N = 3 SE +/- 37.44, N = 3 SE +/- 82.35, N = 3 SE +/- 62.23, N = 3 21642 12637 21587 21664
Blender Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 108.91 195.75 109.57 108.89
PyPerformance Benchmark: regex_compile OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 152 311 154 154
PyPerformance Benchmark: python_startup OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 8.09 12.60 6.43 12.50
Geekbench Test: CPU Multi Core OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 23.58, N = 3 SE +/- 11.46, N = 3 SE +/- 13.30, N = 3 SE +/- 45.68, N = 3 11365 7746 11375 11207
Geekbench Test: CPU Multi Core - Gaussian Blur OpenBenchmarking.org Mpixels/sec, More Is Better Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core - Gaussian Blur CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.76, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 2.69, N = 3 SE +/- 6.58, N = 3 794.7 455.4 793.0 741.8
Geekbench Test: CPU Multi Core - Face Detection OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec, More Is Better Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core - Face Detection CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 SE +/- 0.80, N = 3 SE +/- 1.62, N = 3 SE +/- 0.95, N = 3 137.6 74.7 135.2 139.4
Geekbench Test: CPU Multi Core - Horizon Detection OpenBenchmarking.org Gpixels/sec, More Is Better Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core - Horizon Detection CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 240.2 192.3 242.5 242.0
Geekbench Test: CPU Single Core OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 7.22, N = 3 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 1440 724 1444 1405
Geekbench Test: CPU Single Core - Gaussian Blur OpenBenchmarking.org Mpixels/sec, More Is Better Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core - Gaussian Blur CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 88.6 44.2 88.6 86.4
Geekbench Test: CPU Single Core - Face Detection OpenBenchmarking.org images/sec, More Is Better Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core - Face Detection CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 11.60 5.72 11.70 11.50
Geekbench Test: CPU Single Core - Horizon Detection OpenBenchmarking.org Gpixels/sec, More Is Better Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core - Horizon Detection CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 33.2 16.8 33.6 32.6
Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 1.52, N = 3 SE +/- 1.33, N = 3 SE +/- 2.75, N = 3 SE +/- 3.08, N = 3 732.6 1352.6 694.6 704.4 1. firefox 80.0
Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 207.02, N = 12 SE +/- 22.50, N = 3 SE +/- 74.50, N = 2 13599 8478 13841 1. firefox 80.0
Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox OpenBenchmarking.org Runs / Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.45, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 85.4 62.5 101.0 79.3 1. firefox 80.0
Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.0575 2.115 3.1725 4.23 5.2875 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 15 4.4 4.7 4.0 4.7 1. firefox 80.0
Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox OpenBenchmarking.org Runs Per Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 1.04, N = 3 SE +/- 1.20, N = 3 103.00 54.50 105.50 102.00 1. firefox 80.0
Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 5.75, N = 3 SE +/- 2.53, N = 3 SE +/- 8.27, N = 3 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 688.6 1286.5 657.2 683.5 1. chrome 85.0.4183.83
Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox OpenBenchmarking.org Score, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 7.84, N = 3 SE +/- 6.66, N = 3 SE +/- 7.97, N = 3 SE +/- 7.06, N = 3 1298 2365 1234 1391 1. firefox 80.0
Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google Chrome CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Schedutil 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 172.14, N = 3 SE +/- 58.88, N = 3 SE +/- 180.50, N = 2 22145 13518 21339 1. chrome 85.0.4183.83
Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs / Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.12, N = 3 36.52 20.56 38.70 39.10 1. chrome 85.0.4183.83
Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Google Chrome CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 1.0575 2.115 3.1725 4.23 5.2875 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 15 4.3 4.7 3.7 4.7 1. chrome 85.0.4183.83
Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Runs Per Minute, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 143.00 76.89 148.20 139.00 1. chrome 85.0.4183.83
Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org Score, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 2.03, N = 3 SE +/- 5.57, N = 3 SE +/- 2.08, N = 3 1309 2456 1304 1346 1. chrome 85.0.4183.83
Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 26.3 52.8 25.7 25.2 1. firefox 80.0
Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 3.89, N = 3 SE +/- 2.70, N = 3 SE +/- 4.65, N = 4 SE +/- 3.94, N = 7 356.6 718.1 360.1 348.3 1. firefox 80.0
Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.34, N = 3 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 SE +/- 0.38, N = 3 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 27.18 54.57 27.36 27.18 1. chrome 85.0.4183.83
Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome OpenBenchmarking.org ms, Fewer Is Better Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 4.58, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 1.00, N = 3 SE +/- 4.46, N = 3 272.85 555.01 280.43 273.80 1. chrome 85.0.4183.83
Tesseract OCR Time To OCR 7 Images OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 Time To OCR 7 Images CPUFreq Ondemand CPUFreq Powersave CPUFreq Performance CPUFreq Schedutil 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 22.79 42.68 22.55 22.51
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4