Intel Xeon E5-2609 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2609 0 testing with a Supermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF v0123456789 and Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450 on Ubuntu 12.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1304113-LSAU-MERGE1369&grw&sor .
Intel Xeon E5-2609 Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Network OS Kernel Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz (8 Cores) Supermicro X9DRH-7TF/7F/iTF/iF v0123456789 Intel Sandy Bridge DMI2 4 x 8192 MB DDR3-1066MHz Samsung 2000GB Western Digital WD2001FASS-0 Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450 Intel 10 Gigabit X540-AT2 Ubuntu 12.04 3.2.0-39-generic (x86_64) GCC 4.6 ext4 1280x1024 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (24 Cores) 4 x 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz Samsung 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (32 Cores) 4 x 8192 MB DDR3-1600MHz Samsung 3.2.0-40-generic (x86_64) OpenBenchmarking.org Compiler Details - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-arch-32=i686 --with-tune=generic -v Disk Details - CFQ / barrier=1,data=ordered,errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw,user_xattr Processor Details - Scaling Governor: ondemand System Details - Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Python 2.7.3.
Intel Xeon E5-2609 tscp: AI Chess Performance scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization crafty: Elapsed Time clomp: Static OMP Speedup compilebench: Read Compiled Tree ramspeed: Average - Integer ramspeed: Average - Floating Point tiobench: Rand Read - 256MB - 32 stream: Triad network-loopback: Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback minion: Solitaire unpack-linux: linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2 blake2: Phoronix Test Suite v4.4.1 botan: X9.19-MAC java-scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization cachebench: Read / Modify / Write encode-flac: WAV To FLAC encode-mp3: WAV To MP3 encode-ape: WAV To APE encode-wavpack: WAV To WavPack encode-ogg: WAV To Ogg dcraw: RAW To PPM Image Conversion espeak: Text-To-Speech Synthesis dbench: 256 fio: Example Network Job fio: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern fs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size iozone: 1MB - 8GB - Read Performance iozone: 1MB - 8GB - Write Performance hmmer: Pfam Database Search mafft: Multiple Sequence Alignment mrbayes: Primate Phylogeny Analysis himeno: Poisson Pressure Solver dolfyn: Computational Fluid Dynamics lammps: Rhodopsin Protein parboil: Two-Point Angular Correlation npb: SP.A rodinia: OpenMP Streamcluster ffte: N=64, 1D Complex FFT Routine postmark: Disk Transaction Performance n-queens: Elapsed Time build-imagemagick: Time To Compile build-mplayer: Time To Compile primesieve: 1e12 Prime Number Generation compress-7zip: Compress Speed Test john-the-ripper: Blowfish build-php: Time To Compile compress-pbzip2: 256MB File Compression nero2d: Total Time build-linux-kernel: Time To Compile open-porous-media: Upscale-Relperm sunflow: Global Illumination + Image Synthesis vpxenc: vpxenc graphics-magick: Sharpen compress-lzma: 256MB File Compression tachyon: Total Time x264: H.264 Video Encoding c-ray: Total Time ttsiod-renderer: Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping povray: Total Time ffmpeg: H.264 HD To NTSC DV blogbench: Read nginx: Static Web Page Serving apache: Static Web Page Serving sample-program: Phoronix Test Suite v4.4.1 openssl: RSA 4096-bit Performance phpbench: PHP Benchmark Suite sqlite: /tmp [/dev/sda6] sqlite: Default Test Directory byte: Floating-Point Arithmetic fhourstones: Complex Connect-4 Solving gmpbench: Total Time sudokut: Total Time compress-gzip: 2GB File Compression gnupg: 1GB File Encryption bork: File Encryption Time mencoder: AVI To LAVC pybench: Total For Average Test Times aio-stress: Rand Write smallpt: Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 344537 1454.21 121.47 2.88 458.82 17743.71 15124.50 7599.96 23210.08 24.68 137.35 14.07 5.93 47.58 1947.63 11733.15 9.56 22.09 9.15 14.97 12.61 97.26 62.92 108.64 7.44 3294.71 20.47 6325.51 85.38 12.31 6.22 23.42 965.60 39.71 65.88 2320.22 1278.50 81.82 3371.41 3205 43.71 56.23 47.82 75.39 18362 4560 33.42 7.96 725.48 81.54 181.78 4.92 24.07 54 203.30 13.30 138.85 37.74 16.57 1075 25.10 1320263 18511.10 20998.79 5.66 74.73 59978 1071.55 1510.46 1 8037.63 2121.40 33.19 18.70 13.70 29.56 35.80 3124 1646.46 101 359140 1521.65 116.31 3.38 455.99 19869.93 16261.81 7598.45 30703.03 29.58 134.30 14.39 4.75 49.03 2066.77 12316.60 9.24 21.35 8.81 14.41 12.13 93.34 60.86 102.39 8.98 3282.77 20.37 5405.73 86.79 12.90 5.73 1003.10 38.23 63.77 2573.68 936.64 69.18 3510.18 3378 21.54 40.00 35.45 46.18 32874 9393 24.42 4.48 699.55 51.12 181.42 2.22 20.21 90 182.79 7.50 189.94 27.04 17.31 1040 30.02 1300092 19202.21 16290.14 5.46 77.53 62443 1054.72 1643.16 1 8389.62 2206.40 32.60 18.07 13.12 27.87 34.25 2997 1826.84 50 400346 1706.67 103.79 3.20 493.19 22364.09 18087.99 8252.82 56886.16 29.15 120.86 13.66 3.95 55.52 2454.81 13938.42 8.27 18.96 7.90 12.86 10.86 83.53 54.32 100.01 8.58 3487.98 20.43 5840.62 86.99 12.18 5.74 1121.67 34.29 56.46 2864.11 998.76 42.11 3900.19 3694 15.51 32.67 28.48 33.45 42753 12842 20.63 3.32 625.41 38.85 152.90 1.78 19.71 108 162.38 5.45 210.83 19.43 17.42 923 31.22 1279039 21705.75 16885.02 4.90 86.73 69461 1117.98 1565.79 1 9658.30 2473.90 29.50 16.15 11.72 25.26 30.62 2675 1926.95 37 OpenBenchmarking.org
TSCP AI Chess Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 1146.43, N = 5 SE +/- 158.74, N = 5 SE +/- 146.20, N = 5 400346 359140 344537
SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 1.58, N = 4 SE +/- 2.18, N = 4 SE +/- 0.99, N = 4 1706.67 1521.65 1454.21
Crafty Elapsed Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Crafty 23.4 Elapsed Time Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 103.79 116.31 121.47 1. (CC) gcc options: -lstdc++ -lm
CLOMP Static OMP Speedup OpenBenchmarking.org Speedup, More Is Better CLOMP 3.3 Static OMP Speedup Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 0.7605 1.521 2.2815 3.042 3.8025 SE +/- 0.04, N = 10 SE +/- 0.04, N = 10 SE +/- 0.03, N = 5 3.38 3.20 2.88 1. (CC) gcc options: --openmp -O3 -lm
Compile Bench Test: Read Compiled Tree OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 6.68, N = 5 SE +/- 7.34, N = 3 493.19 458.82 455.99
RAMspeed SMP Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K 22364.09 19869.93 17743.71
RAMspeed SMP Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K 18087.99 16261.81 15124.50
Threaded I/O Tester Test: Random Read - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 32 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Threaded I/O Tester 0.3.3 Test: Random Read - Size Per Thread: 256MB - Thread Count: 32 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 132.45, N = 8 SE +/- 96.88, N = 4 SE +/- 131.80, N = 4 8252.82 7599.96 7598.45
Stream Type: Triad OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Stream 2009-04-11 Type: Triad Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 222.38, N = 10 SE +/- 35.23, N = 10 SE +/- 225.56, N = 10 56886.16 30703.03 23210.08 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -fopenmp
Loopback TCP Network Performance Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Loopback TCP Network Performance Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.40, N = 3 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 24.68 29.15 29.58
Minion Benchmark: Solitaire OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Minion 0.15 Benchmark: Solitaire Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.59, N = 3 SE +/- 0.66, N = 3 120.86 134.30 137.35 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -rdynamic -lboost_iostreams-mt -lz -lbz2
Unpacking The Linux Kernel linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Unpacking The Linux Kernel linux-2.6.32.tar.bz2 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.06, N = 4 SE +/- 0.07, N = 4 SE +/- 0.19, N = 4 13.66 14.07 14.39
BLAKE2 Phoronix Test Suite v4.4.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Cycles Per Byte, Fewer Is Better BLAKE2 20121223 Phoronix Test Suite v4.4.1 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 1.3343 2.6686 4.0029 5.3372 6.6715 SE +/- 0.29, N = 6 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 3.95 4.75 5.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -O3 -march=native
Botan Test: X9.19-MAC OpenBenchmarking.org Mbytes/s, More Is Better Botan 1.10.3 Test: X9.19-MAC Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 12 24 36 48 60 55.52 49.03 47.58 1. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -ldl -lpthread -lrt
Java SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 1.45, N = 4 SE +/- 31.46, N = 5 SE +/- 8.47, N = 4 2454.81 2066.77 1947.63
CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 55.98, N = 3 SE +/- 103.15, N = 3 SE +/- 161.52, N = 5 13938.42 12316.60 11733.15 1. (CC) gcc options: -lrt
FLAC Audio Encoding WAV To FLAC OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better FLAC Audio Encoding 1.2.1 WAV To FLAC Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 SE +/- 0.01, N = 5 SE +/- 0.01, N = 5 8.27 9.24 9.56 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -logg -lm
LAME MP3 Encoding WAV To MP3 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better LAME MP3 Encoding 3.99.3 WAV To MP3 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 5 SE +/- 0.12, N = 5 SE +/- 0.01, N = 5 18.96 21.35 22.09
Monkey Audio Encoding WAV To APE OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Monkey Audio Encoding 3.99u4b5s6 WAV To APE Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.07, N = 5 SE +/- 0.08, N = 5 SE +/- 0.08, N = 5 7.90 8.81 9.15 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pedantic
WavPack Audio Encoding WAV To WavPack OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better WavPack Audio Encoding 4.41.0 WAV To WavPack Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.00, N = 5 SE +/- 0.03, N = 5 SE +/- 0.03, N = 5 12.86 14.41 14.97 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm
Ogg Encoding WAV To Ogg OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Ogg Encoding 1.3.0 WAV To Ogg Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.01, N = 5 SE +/- 0.01, N = 5 SE +/- 0.01, N = 5 10.86 12.13 12.61 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ffast-math -fsigned-char -lm -logg
dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 83.53 93.34 97.26 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm
eSpeak Speech Engine Text-To-Speech Synthesis OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better eSpeak Speech Engine 1.40.02 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 54.32 60.86 62.92 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lstdc++ -lespeak
Dbench Client Count: 256 OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 256 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.88, N = 3 SE +/- 1.78, N = 3 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 108.64 102.39 100.01 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt
Flexible IO Tester Test: Example Network Job OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds (Run Time), Fewer Is Better Flexible IO Tester 1.57 Test: Example Network Job Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 7.44 8.58 8.98
Flexible IO Tester Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds (Run Time), Fewer Is Better Flexible IO Tester 1.57 Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Pattern Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 5.40, N = 3 SE +/- 5.68, N = 3 SE +/- 19.24, N = 3 3282.77 3294.71 3487.98
FS-Mark Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 20.47 20.43 20.37 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 51.09, N = 3 SE +/- 242.95, N = 6 SE +/- 196.06, N = 6 6325.51 5840.62 5405.73 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
IOzone Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.405 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 1.48, N = 6 86.99 86.79 85.38 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Timed HMMer Search Pfam Database Search OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 12.18 12.31 12.90 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread -lhmmer -lsquid -lm
Timed MAFFT Alignment Multiple Sequence Alignment OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MAFFT Alignment 6.864 Multiple Sequence Alignment Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.26, N = 6 SE +/- 0.11, N = 6 SE +/- 0.09, N = 6 5.73 5.74 6.22 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lm -lpthread
Timed MrBayes Analysis Primate Phylogeny Analysis OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.1.2 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Comparatif Intel E5 #1 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 23.42
Himeno Benchmark Poisson Pressure Solver OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 4.61, N = 3 SE +/- 3.98, N = 3 SE +/- 7.89, N = 3 1121.67 1003.10 965.60 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Dolfyn Computational Fluid Dynamics OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 34.29 38.23 39.71
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator Test: Rhodopsin Protein OpenBenchmarking.org Loop Time, Fewer Is Better LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 1.0 Test: Rhodopsin Protein Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 56.46 63.77 65.88 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lfftw -lmpich
Parboil Test: Two-Point Angular Correlation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parboil 2.5 Test: Two-Point Angular Correlation Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 12.66, N = 3 SE +/- 8.59, N = 3 SE +/- 42.48, N = 3 2320.22 2573.68 2864.11 1. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp
NAS Parallel Benchmarks Test / Class: SP.A OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3 Test / Class: SP.A Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.60, N = 3 SE +/- 2.86, N = 3 SE +/- 0.62, N = 3 1278.50 998.76 936.64 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -lmpi -pthread -lmpi_f77 -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -ldl -lnsl -lutil -lm
Rodinia Test: OpenMP Streamcluster OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Rodinia 2.2 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 4.17, N = 6 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 2.27, N = 6 42.11 69.18 81.82 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fopenmp
FFTE Test: N=64, 1D Complex FFT Routine OpenBenchmarking.org MFLOPS, More Is Better FFTE 5.0 Test: N=64, 1D Complex FFT Routine Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 14.82, N = 3 SE +/- 2.60, N = 3 SE +/- 0.68, N = 3 3900.19 3510.18 3371.41 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fopenmp -pthread -lmpi_f90 -lmpi_f77 -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -ldl -lnsl -lutil -lm
PostMark Disk Transaction Performance OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 18.33, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 23.67, N = 3 3694 3378 3205 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
N-Queens Elapsed Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 15.51 21.54 43.71 1. (CC) gcc options: -static -fopenmp -O3
Timed ImageMagick Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.8.1-10 Time To Compile Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 32.67 40.00 56.23
Timed MPlayer Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.0-rc3 Time To Compile Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.53, N = 3 28.48 35.45 47.82
Primesieve 1e12 Prime Number Generation OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Primesieve 4.2 1e12 Prime Number Generation Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 33.45 46.18 75.39 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -fopenmp
7-Zip Compression Compress Speed Test OpenBenchmarking.org MIPS, More Is Better 7-Zip Compression 9.20.1 Compress Speed Test Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 406.72, N = 3 SE +/- 141.17, N = 3 SE +/- 41.67, N = 3 42753 32874 18362 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -lpthread
John The Ripper Test: Blowfish OpenBenchmarking.org Real C/S, More Is Better John The Ripper 1.7.9-jumbo-7 Test: Blowfish Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 55.94, N = 3 SE +/- 68.86, N = 3 SE +/- 27.71, N = 3 12842 9393 4560 1. (CC) gcc options: -lssl -lcrypto -lm -lz -fopenmp -lcrypt -ldl
Timed PHP Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed PHP Compilation 5.2.9 Time To Compile Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 20.63 24.42 33.42 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pedantic -ldl -lz -lm
Parallel BZIP2 Compression 256MB File Compression OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.6 256MB File Compression Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 3.32 4.48 7.96 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -pthread -lbz2 -lpthread
Open FMM Nero2D Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 Total Time Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 160 320 480 640 800 625.41 699.55 725.48 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lfftw3 -llapack -lblas -lgfortran -lquadmath -lm
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation Time To Compile OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 3.1 Time To Compile Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.55, N = 6 SE +/- 0.95, N = 3 SE +/- 0.94, N = 3 38.85 51.12 81.54
Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Upscale-Relperm OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Open Porous Media 2012-10-26 OPM Benchmark: Upscale-Relperm Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 40 80 120 160 200 152.90 181.42 181.78 1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -O3 -pthread -lmpi -lopen-rte -lopen-pal -lm -lboost_system-mt -lboost_date_time-mt -lsuperlu -lgfortran -lquadmath -lblas -lnsl -lutil -ldl -llapack
Sunflow Rendering System Global Illumination + Image Synthesis OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 Global Illumination + Image Synthesis Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 1.107 2.214 3.321 4.428 5.535 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 2 SE +/- 0.04, N = 2 1.78 2.22 4.92
VP8 libvpx Encoding vpxenc OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better VP8 libvpx Encoding 1.1.0 vpxenc Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 SE +/- 0.16, N = 3 SE +/- 0.31, N = 3 24.07 20.21 19.71 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lvpx -lm -lpthread
GraphicsMagick Operation: Sharpen OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.16 Operation: Sharpen Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 108 90 54 1. (CC) gcc options: -std=gnu99 -fopenmp -O2 -pthread -ljpeg -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
LZMA Compression 256MB File Compression OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better LZMA Compression 256MB File Compression Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.59, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 SE +/- 0.79, N = 3 162.38 182.79 203.30 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2
Tachyon Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Tachyon 0.98.9 Total Time Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 5.45 7.50 13.30 1. (CC) gcc options: -m32 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -ltachyon -lm -lpthread
x264 H.264 Video Encoding OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better x264 2013-01-28 H.264 Video Encoding Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.48, N = 4 SE +/- 3.22, N = 3 SE +/- 1.81, N = 3 210.83 189.94 138.85
C-Ray Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.20, N = 3 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 19.43 27.04 37.74 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3
TTSIOD 3D Renderer Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.2z Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 17.42 17.31 16.57 1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -mtune=native -flto -msse -mrecip -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -mssse3 -lSDL -lstdc++
POV-Ray Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better POV-Ray 3.6.1 Total Time Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 200 400 600 800 1000 923 1040 1075 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -O3 -msse -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -march=k8 -mtune=k8 -malign-double -ltiff -ljpeg -lz -lXpm -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lm
FFmpeg H.264 HD To NTSC DV OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 1.1 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 25.10 30.02 31.22 1. (CC) gcc options: -lavdevice -lavfilter -lavformat -lavcodec -lswresample -lswscale -lavutil -ldl -lasound -lSDL -lm -pthread -lbz2 -lrt
BlogBench Test: Read OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.0 Test: Read Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 2962.66, N = 3 SE +/- 21076.38, N = 3 SE +/- 19542.50, N = 3 1320263 1300092 1279039 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
NGINX Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better NGINX Benchmark 1.0.11 Static Web Page Serving Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 410.23, N = 3 SE +/- 333.00, N = 3 SE +/- 332.64, N = 3 21705.75 19202.21 18511.10 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread -lcrypt -lcrypto -lz
Apache Benchmark Static Web Page Serving OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Apache Benchmark 2.4.3 Static Web Page Serving Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 243.82, N = 3 SE +/- 214.15, N = 3 SE +/- 239.04, N = 3 20998.79 16885.02 16290.14 1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread
Sample Pi Program Phoronix Test Suite v4.4.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Sample Pi Program Phoronix Test Suite v4.4.1 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 1.2735 2.547 3.8205 5.094 6.3675 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 4.90 5.46 5.66
OpenSSL RSA 4096-bit Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Signs Per Second, More Is Better OpenSSL 1.0.1c RSA 4096-bit Performance Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 86.73 77.53 74.73 1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
PHPBench PHP Benchmark Suite OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 931.15, N = 3 SE +/- 512.47, N = 3 SE +/- 39.64, N = 3 69461 62443 59978
SQLite Test Target: /tmp [/dev/sda6] OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.7.3 Test Target: /tmp [/dev/sda6] Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 5.94, N = 3 SE +/- 4.59, N = 3 SE +/- 3.77, N = 3 1054.72 1071.55 1117.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lcurses -ldl -lpthread
SQLite Test Target: Default Test Directory OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.7.3 Test Target: Default Test Directory Comparatif Intel E5 #1 Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 16.00, N = 3 SE +/- 83.51, N = 3 SE +/- 136.41, N = 3 1510.46 1565.79 1643.16 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lcurses -ldl -lpthread
BYTE Unix Benchmark Computational Test: Floating-Point Arithmetic OpenBenchmarking.org LPS, More Is Better BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Floating-Point Arithmetic Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 0.225 0.45 0.675 0.9 1.125 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1 1 1
Fhourstones Complex Connect-4 Solving OpenBenchmarking.org Kpos / sec, More Is Better Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 9.98, N = 3 SE +/- 177.24, N = 6 SE +/- 37.49, N = 3 9658.30 8389.62 8037.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
GMPbench Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org GMPbench Score, More Is Better GMPbench 0.2 Total Time Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2473.90 2206.40 2121.40 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
Sudokut Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 29.50 32.60 33.19
Gzip Compression 2GB File Compression OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Gzip Compression 2GB File Compression Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 16.15 18.07 18.70
GnuPG 1GB File Encryption OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better GnuPG 1.4.10 1GB File Encryption Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.01, N = 4 SE +/- 0.02, N = 4 SE +/- 0.03, N = 4 11.72 13.12 13.70
Bork File Encrypter File Encryption Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.39, N = 6 SE +/- 0.30, N = 3 SE +/- 0.61, N = 6 25.26 27.87 29.56
Mencoder AVI To LAVC OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Mencoder 1.1 AVI To LAVC Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.27, N = 3 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 30.62 34.25 35.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -ffast-math -lncurses -lpng -lz -ljpeg -lungif -lasound -ldl -lpthread -lfreetype -lfontconfig -lfribidi -lass -lenca -lbz2 -lmad -lspeex -ltheoradec -logg -lrtmp -lopencore-amrnb -lopencore-amrwb -rdynamic -lfaac -lmp3lame
PyBench Total For Average Test Times OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2008-08-14 Total For Average Test Times Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 8.51, N = 3 SE +/- 4.36, N = 3 SE +/- 2.52, N = 3 2675 2997 3124
AIO-Stress Test: Random Write OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better AIO-Stress 0.21 Test: Random Write Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 36.95, N = 3 SE +/- 15.87, N = 3 SE +/- 24.10, N = 3 1926.95 1826.84 1646.46 1. (CC) gcc options: -laio -lpthread
Smallpt Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 100 Samples Comparatif Intel E5 #3 Comparatif Intel E5 #2 Comparatif Intel E5 #1 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 37 50 101 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5