USB 2.0 vs. USB 3.0 Corsair Flash Drive

Benchmarking 16GB USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 Corsair Flash Voyagers with the F2FS file-system from the Linux 3.8 kernel. Benchmarking for a future article on Phoronix.com.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1303045-FO-USB20VSUS50
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
USB 3.0 Flash Voyager
March 04 2013
 
USB 2.0 Flash Voyager
March 04 2013
 
Invert Hiding All Results Option
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


USB 2.0 vs. USB 3.0 Corsair Flash DriveOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteAMD FX-8350 Eight-Core @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores)ASUS Crosshair V FormulaAMD ATI RD890 bridge8192MB60GB OCZ VERTEX2AMD Radeon HD 6570 512MBRealtek ALC889DELL P2210HIntel 82583V Gigabit ConnectionUbuntu 13.043.8.0-7-generic (x86_64)Xfce 4.10X Server 1.13.2radeon 7.1.02.1 Mesa 9.2-devel (git-d8d58bd) Gallium 0.4GCC 4.7 + Clang 3.3 (SVN 176002) + LLVM 3.3svnF2FS1920x1080ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionUSB 2.0 Vs. USB 3.0 Corsair Flash Drive BenchmarksSystem Logs- --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-cloog-version-check --disable-ppl-version-check --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-cloog-backend=ppl --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,c++,go,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-cloog --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-tune=generic -v - DEADLINE / acl,active_logs=6,background_gc_on,relatime,rw,user_xattr- Disk Scheduler: DEADLINE.

USB 3.0 Flash Voyager vs. USB 2.0 Flash Voyager ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+45.4%+45.4%+90.8%+90.8%+136.2%+136.2%4.2%4.F.3.S.D.1.S181.4%1.F.1.S176%122.7%D.T.PFS-MarkFS-MarkDbenchPostMarkUSB 3.0 Flash VoyagerUSB 2.0 Flash Voyager

USB 2.0 vs. USB 3.0 Corsair Flash Drivefs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Sizefs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Sizedbench: 1postmark: Disk Transaction PerformanceUSB 3.0 Flash VoyagerUSB 2.0 Flash Voyager18.1317.5347.1937316.576.2338.473886OpenBenchmarking.org

FS-Mark

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB SizeUSB 3.0 Flash VoyagerUSB 2.0 Flash Voyager48121620SE +/- 0.35, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 318.136.571. (CC) gcc options: -static
OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB SizeUSB 3.0 Flash VoyagerUSB 2.0 Flash Voyager510152025Min: 17.6 / Avg: 18.13 / Max: 18.8Min: 6.5 / Avg: 6.57 / Max: 6.61. (CC) gcc options: -static

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB SizeUSB 3.0 Flash VoyagerUSB 2.0 Flash Voyager48121620SE +/- 0.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 317.536.231. (CC) gcc options: -static
OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB SizeUSB 3.0 Flash VoyagerUSB 2.0 Flash Voyager48121620Min: 17 / Avg: 17.53 / Max: 17.8Min: 6.2 / Avg: 6.23 / Max: 6.31. (CC) gcc options: -static

Dbench

Dbench is a benchmark designed by the Samba project as a free alternative to netbench, but dbench contains only file-system calls for testing the disk performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.0Client Count: 1USB 3.0 Flash VoyagerUSB 2.0 Flash Voyager1122334455SE +/- 0.66, N = 3SE +/- 0.52, N = 347.1938.471. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.0Client Count: 1USB 3.0 Flash VoyagerUSB 2.0 Flash Voyager1020304050Min: 46.18 / Avg: 47.19 / Max: 48.42Min: 37.45 / Avg: 38.47 / Max: 39.111. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt

PostMark

This is a test of NetApp's PostMark benchmark designed to simulate small-file testing similar to the tasks endured by web and mail servers. This test profile will set PostMark to perform 25,000 transactions with 500 files simultaneously with the file sizes ranging between 5 and 512 kilobytes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostMark 1.51Disk Transaction PerformanceUSB 3.0 Flash VoyagerUSB 2.0 Flash Voyager8001600240032004000SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 20.00, N = 3373138861. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostMark 1.51Disk Transaction PerformanceUSB 3.0 Flash VoyagerUSB 2.0 Flash Voyager7001400210028003500Min: 3731 / Avg: 3731 / Max: 3731Min: 3846 / Avg: 3886 / Max: 39061. (CC) gcc options: -O3