Linux 3.2 FSes On ThinkPad W510

On a Linux 3.2 development kernel running Ubuntu 11.10 x86_64 comparing the performance of EXT4, Btrfs, and NILFS2 with default mount options for a future article on Phoronix.com by Michael Larabel.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1112147-AR-LINUX32FS17
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results
Show Result Confidence Charts
Allow Limiting Results To Certain Suite(s)

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Toggle/Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
EXT4
December 14 2011
 
Btrfs
December 14 2011
 
NILFS2
December 15 2011
 
Invert Behavior (Only Show Selected Data)
 

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Linux 3.2 FSes On ThinkPad W510OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i7 720Q @ 1.60GHz (8 Cores)LENOVO 4318CTOIntel Core DMI2 x 2048 MB 1066MHz160GB INTEL SSDSA2M160NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 1024MB (550/790MHz)Conexant CX20585Intel 82577LM Gigabit Connection + Intel Centrino Ultimate-N 6300Ubuntu 11.103.2.0-030200rc2-generic (x86_64)Unity 4.22.0X Server 1.10.4nouveau 0.0.162.1 Mesa 7.11 Gallium 0.4GCC 4.6.1ext4btrfsnilfs1600x900ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemsScreen ResolutionLinux 3.2 FSes On ThinkPad W510 BenchmarksSystem Logs- Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Python 2.7.2+. Compiz was running on this system.

EXT4BtrfsNILFS2Result OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%292%484%676%868%PostMarkFlexible IO TesterDbenchSQLiteCompile BenchIOzone

Linux 3.2 FSes On ThinkPad W510fio: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Patterndbench: 6sqlite: Default Test Directorycompilebench: Compileiozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Write Performanceiozone: 1MB - 8GB - Write Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Write Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Read Performanceiozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Read Performancecompilebench: Read Compiled Treeiozone: 1MB - 8GB - Read Performancepostmark: Disk Transaction Performancecompilebench: Initial CreateEXT4BtrfsNILFS2105.88523.2719.14109.12107.17103.71103.66251.59251.35510.37242.78339394.40585.05518.5585.68105.79104.72106.00104.19217.55217.42527.82220.35277759.60731.4998.2732.6774.6679.6379.2178.45226.33226.40511.75210.5739149.03OpenBenchmarking.org

Flexible IO Tester

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds (Run Time), Fewer Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 1.57Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access PatternBtrfsEXT4NILFS2160320480640800SE +/- 5.68, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 4.24, N = 3585.05105.88731.49

Dbench

Dbench is a benchmark designed by the Samba project as a free alternative to netbench, but dbench contains only file-system calls for testing the disk performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.0Client Count: 6BtrfsEXT4NILFS2110220330440550SE +/- 6.72, N = 3SE +/- 0.70, N = 3518.55523.2798.27

SQLite

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.7.3Test Target: Default Test DirectoryBtrfsEXT4NILFS220406080100SE +/- 1.20, N = 5SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 385.6819.1432.67

Compile Bench

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: CompileBtrfsEXT4NILFS220406080100SE +/- 0.50, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.27, N = 3105.79109.1274.66

IOzone

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.347Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write PerformanceBtrfsEXT4NILFS220406080100SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 2104.72107.1779.63

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.347Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write PerformanceBtrfsEXT4NILFS220406080100SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 2106.00103.7179.21

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.347Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write PerformanceBtrfsEXT4NILFS220406080100SE +/- 0.70, N = 3SE +/- 0.88, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3104.19103.6678.45

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.347Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read PerformanceBtrfsEXT4NILFS250100150200250SE +/- 0.51, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3217.55251.59226.33

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.347Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read PerformanceBtrfsEXT4NILFS250100150200250SE +/- 1.73, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3217.42251.35226.40

Compile Bench

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Read Compiled TreeBtrfsEXT4NILFS2110220330440550SE +/- 3.18, N = 3SE +/- 2.38, N = 3SE +/- 6.01, N = 3527.82510.37511.75

IOzone

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.347Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read PerformanceBtrfsEXT4NILFS250100150200250SE +/- 0.81, N = 3SE +/- 7.60, N = 6SE +/- 0.32, N = 3220.35242.78210.57

PostMark

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostMark 1.51Disk Transaction PerformanceBtrfsEXT4NILFS27001400210028003500SE +/- 0.00, N = 5SE +/- 72.83, N = 10SE +/- 1.20, N = 527773393391

Compile Bench

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Initial CreateBtrfsEXT4NILFS220406080100SE +/- 1.47, N = 6SE +/- 1.46, N = 5SE +/- 0.49, N = 359.6094.4049.03