suite_16112011

Pentium E5200 testing with a Intel D945GCNL and Intel 82945G/GZ IGP 256MB on Ubuntu 10.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1111177-LI-SUITE161193
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
suite_16112011
November 16 2011
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

suite_16112011

Processor: Pentium E5200 @ 2.40GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: Intel D945GCNL, Chipset: Intel 82945G/GZ/P/PL + ICH7, Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 160GB SAMSUNG HD161HJ, Graphics: Intel 82945G/GZ IGP 256MB, Audio: Realtek ALC888, Monitor: 712Sa, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168B

OS: Ubuntu 10.04, Kernel: 2.6.32-35-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME 2.30.2, Display Server: X Server 1.7.6, Display Driver: intel 2.9.1, Compiler: GCC 4.4.3, File-System: ext2/ext3, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024

System Notes: Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Python 2.6.5. Compiz was running on this system. The was in a power-savings mode.

suite_16112011OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuitePentium E5200 @ 2.40GHz (2 Cores)Intel D945GCNLIntel 82945G/GZ/P/PL + ICH72048MB160GB SAMSUNG HD161HJIntel 82945G/GZ IGP 256MBRealtek ALC888712SaRealtek RTL8111/8168BUbuntu 10.042.6.32-35-generic (x86_64)GNOME 2.30.2X Server 1.7.6intel 2.9.1GCC 4.4.3ext2/ext31280x1024ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionSuite_16112011 BenchmarksSystem Logs- Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Python 2.6.5. Compiz was running on this system. The was in a power-savings mode.

suite_16112011fs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Sizeblogbench: Readblogbench: Writebyte: Floating-Point Arithmeticcachebench: Read / Modify / Writeaio-stress: Rand Writestream: Triadramspeed: Average - Integerramspeed: Average - Floating Pointcompilebench: Read Compiled Treehimeno: Poisson Pressure Solvercompress-7zip: Compress Speed Testjohn-the-ripper: Blowfishapache: Static Web Page Servingopenssl: RSA 4096-bit Performancenpb: UA.Apostmark: Disk Transaction Performancegcrypt: CAMELLIA256-ECB Cipherfio: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Patternfio: Example Network Jobsqlite: Default Test Directorypovray: Total Timecompress-pbzip2: 256MB File Compressionencode-mp3: WAV To MP3c-ray: Total Timenetwork-loopback: Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopbacksuite_1611201151.231278075371945203.8312053.749.072055.042037.122023.9150.40162.9333106207808.6235.235.91386381712420.6811.5737.29129156.5236.57209.9836.81OpenBenchmarking.org

FS-Mark

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Sizesuite_161120111224364860SE +/- 0.60, N = 351.23

BlogBench

OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.0Test: Readsuite_1611201130K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 9011.91, N = 6127807

OpenBenchmarking.orgFinal Score, More Is BetterBlogBench 1.0Test: Writesuite_16112011120240360480600SE +/- 2.40, N = 3537

BYTE Unix Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgLPS, More Is BetterBYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6Computational Test: Floating-Point Arithmeticsuite_16112011400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 230.66, N = 31945203.83

CacheBench

This is a performance test of CacheBench, which is part of LLCbench. CacheBench is designed to test the memory and cache bandwidth performance Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: Read / Modify / Writesuite_161120113K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 1.89, N = 312053.74

AIO-Stress

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterAIO-Stress 0.21Test: Random Writesuite_161120113691215SE +/- 0.14, N = 59.07

Stream

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterStream 2009-04-11Type: Triadsuite_16112011400800120016002000SE +/- 2.27, N = 102055.04

RAMspeed SMP

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Average - Benchmark: Integersuite_161120114008001200160020002037.12

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Pointsuite_161120114008001200160020002023.91

Compile Bench

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Read Compiled Treesuite_161120111122334455SE +/- 1.27, N = 650.40

Himeno Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgMFLOPS, More Is BetterHimeno Benchmark 3.0Poisson Pressure Solversuite_161120114080120160200SE +/- 0.05, N = 3162.93

7-Zip Compression

OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 9.13Compress Speed Testsuite_161120117001400210028003500SE +/- 2.91, N = 33310

John The Ripper

OpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.7.8Test: Blowfishsuite_16112011130260390520650SE +/- 0.00, N = 3620

Apache Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterApache Benchmark 2.2.17Static Web Page Servingsuite_161120112K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 54.40, N = 37808.62

OpenSSL

OpenBenchmarking.orgSigns Per Second, More Is BetterOpenSSL 1.0.0aRSA 4096-bit Performancesuite_16112011816243240SE +/- 0.02, N = 435.23

NAS Parallel Benchmarks

OpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3Test / Class: UA.Asuite_161120111.32982.65963.98945.31926.649SE +/- 0.00, N = 35.91

PostMark

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostMark 1.51Disk Transaction Performancesuite_1611201180160240320400SE +/- 22.42, N = 10386

Gcrypt Library

OpenBenchmarking.orgMicroseconds, Fewer Is BetterGcrypt Library 1.4.4CAMELLIA256-ECB Ciphersuite_161120118001600240032004000SE +/- 3.33, N = 33817

Flexible IO Tester

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds (Run Time), Fewer Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 1.57Test: Intel IOMeter File Server Access Patternsuite_161120113K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 15.35, N = 312420.68

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds (Run Time), Fewer Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 1.57Test: Example Network Jobsuite_161120113691215SE +/- 0.38, N = 611.57

SQLite

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.7.3Test Target: Default Test Directorysuite_16112011918273645SE +/- 0.10, N = 337.29

POV-Ray

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPOV-Ray 3.6.1Total Timesuite_16112011300600900120015001291

Parallel BZIP2 Compression

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterParallel BZIP2 Compression 1.0.5256MB File Compressionsuite_161120111326395265SE +/- 0.86, N = 356.52

LAME MP3 Encoding

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterLAME MP3 Encoding 3.98.2WAV To MP3suite_16112011816243240SE +/- 0.06, N = 536.57

C-Ray

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterC-Ray 1.1Total Timesuite_1611201150100150200250SE +/- 0.07, N = 3209.98

Loopback TCP Network Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterLoopback TCP Network PerformanceTime To Transfer 10GB Via Loopbacksuite_16112011816243240SE +/- 0.13, N = 336.81

suite_16112011

Processor: Pentium E5200 @ 2.40GHz (2 Cores), Motherboard: Intel D945GCNL, Chipset: Intel 82945G/GZ/P/PL + ICH7, Memory: 2048MB, Disk: 160GB SAMSUNG HD161HJ, Graphics: Intel 82945G/GZ IGP 256MB, Audio: Realtek ALC888, Monitor: 712Sa, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168B

OS: Ubuntu 10.04, Kernel: 2.6.32-35-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME 2.30.2, Display Server: X Server 1.7.6, Display Driver: intel 2.9.1, Compiler: GCC 4.4.3, File-System: ext2/ext3, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024

System Notes: Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Python 2.6.5. Compiz was running on this system. The was in a power-savings mode.

Testing initiated at 16 November 2011 19:59 by user walisson.