AIO-Stress

AIO-Stress is an a-synchronous I/O benchmark created by SuSE. Current this profile uses a 2048MB test file and a 64KB record size.

To run this test with the Phoronix Test Suite, the basic command is: phoronix-test-suite benchmark aio-stress.

Use with caution this test profile is currently marked Deprecated.

Test Created

6 December 2010

Last Updated

6 August 2022

Test Maintainer

Michael Larabel

Test Type

Disk

Average Install Time

2 Seconds

Average Run Time

19 Seconds

Test Dependencies

C/C++ Compiler Toolchain + Linux AIO

Accolades

250k+ Downloads + 10k+ Public Benchmark Results

Supported Platforms

* Uploading of benchmark result data to OpenBenchmarking.org is always optional (opt-in) via the Phoronix Test Suite for users wishing to share their results publicly.
** Data based on those opting to upload their test results to OpenBenchmarking.org and users enabling the opt-in anonymous statistics reporting while running benchmarks from an Internet-connected platform.
*** Test profile page view reporting began March 2021.
Data updated weekly as of 27 December 2024.

Revision History

pts/aio-stress-1.1.3 [View Source] Sat, 06 Aug 2022 18:44:11 GMT
This test is still deprecated and not useful when there are tests like FIO, but update download link so at least mirror is serving for those wanting it...

pts/aio-stress-1.1.2 [View Source] Sun, 27 Sep 2020 09:51:14 GMT
Deprecate aio-stress.

pts/aio-stress-1.1.1 [View Source] Tue, 13 Aug 2013 15:38:53 GMT
Fix aio-stress compilation.

pts/aio-stress-1.1.0 [View Source] Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:00:19 GMT
Initial import into OpenBenchmarking.org

Performance Metrics

Analyze Test Configuration:

AIO-Stress 0.21

Test: Random Write

OpenBenchmarking.org metrics for this test profile configuration based on 6,283 public results since 26 February 2011 with the latest data as of 13 December 2024.

Below is an overview of the generalized performance for components where there is sufficient statistically significant data based upon user-uploaded results. It is important to keep in mind particularly in the Linux/open-source space there can be vastly different OS configurations, with this overview intended to offer just general guidance as to the performance expectations.

Component

Percentile Rank

# Compatible Public Results

MB/s (Average)

750GB Western Digital WD7500BPKX-7

100th

5298 ^{+/- 85}

1024GB Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH

100th

4845 ^{+/- 16}

480GB PERC H755 Front

100th

4704 ^{+/- 222}

2 x 240GB INTEL SSDSC2BW24

100th

4680 ^{+/- 205}

4 x 1920GB Micron_5300_MTFD

100th

4542 ^{+/- 8}

5758GB MR9361-8i

100th

4508 ^{+/- 651}

480GB MR408i-o Gen11

100th

4491 ^{+/- 146}

4 x 256GB LITEONIT LCS-256

100th

4033 ^{+/- 43}

960GB INTEL SSDPED1D960GAY

100th

4016 ^{+/- 45}

1000GB PERC H330 Adp

100th

3901 ^{+/- 34}

2 x 120GB TOSHIBA-TR150

100th

3869 ^{+/- 61}

4001GB Western Digital WD40EZRX-00S

99th

3847 ^{+/- 131}

4798GB MR9361-8i

99th

3704 ^{+/- 321}

2000GB Seagate ST2000DM006-2DM1

98th

3599 ^{+/- 118}

240GB OCZ VERTEX3

98th

3582 ^{+/- 99}

256GB INTEL SSDSC2KW25

98th

3570 ^{+/- 45}

1024GB SK hynix PC711 HFS001TDE9X073N

98th

3558 ^{+/- 9}

4798GB MR9271-8i

97th

3523 ^{+/- 62}

3001GB 9650SE-12M DISK

96th

3410 ^{+/- 369}

500GB Toshiba

95th

3255 ^{+/- 368}

1920GB Seagate IronWolf510 ZP1920NM30001-2S9303

95th

3211 ^{+/- 167}

3839GB MR9271-8i

95th

3094 ^{+/- 15}

8000GB RMS25CB040

94th

2987 ^{+/- 38}

512GB Micron MTFDKBA512TFK

93rd

2967 ^{+/- 5}

500GB Western Digital WD5003ABYX-1

93rd

2947 ^{+/- 294}

525GB Crucial_CT525MX3

93rd

2906 ^{+/- 405}

2879GB MR9271-8i

93rd

2906 ^{+/- 85}

2 x 8002GB HGST HUH728080AL

93rd

2895 ^{+/- 166}

600GB PERC H730 Mini

91st

2622 ^{+/- 303}

120GB INTEL SSDSC2BW12

91st

2620 ^{+/- 365}

731GB PERC H710P

90th

2455 ^{+/- 358}

120GB OCZ VERTEX460

89th

2426 ^{+/- 11}

250GB Western Digital WD2500JD-00H

89th

2419 ^{+/- 123}

1000GB Seagate ST1000LM014-SSHD

88th

2371 ^{+/- 108}

99GB MR9266-8i

87th

2285 ^{+/- 33}

13190GB PERC H730P Mini

87th

2247 ^{+/- 38}

600GB OCZ Z-DRIVE R4 C

87th

2228 ^{+/- 68}

320GB Western Digital WDC WD3200AAKX-0

84th

107

2154 ^{+/- 52}

2 x 500GB Seagate ST500NM0011

84th

2135 ^{+/- 69}

480GB MR

83rd

2083 ^{+/- 250}

120GB PH5-CE120

81st

1915 ^{+/- 7}

64GB SAMSUNG MZ7PC064

81st

1886 ^{+/- 40}

3839GB Supermicro SMC3108

80th

1832 ^{+/- 31}

6 x 500GB Samsung SSD 850

80th

1820 ^{+/- 114}

479GB MR9261-8i

80th

1803 ^{+/- 9}

250GB Seagate ST3250310NS

79th

1780 ^{+/- 5}

120GB KINGSTON SVP200S

79th

1763 ^{+/- 20}

4 x 4001GB Seagate ST4000DM000-1F21

78th

1747 ^{+/- 6}

2 x 2000GB Western Digital WD20EZRX-07D

78th

1744 ^{+/- 10}

36 x 6001GB HGST HUS726060AL

78th

1732 ^{+/- 63}

599GB LSI

78th

1722 ^{+/- 11}

19 x 1000GB Western Digital WD1003FBYZ-0

77th

1689 ^{+/- 35}

Mid-Tier

75th

< 1603

299GB PERC H710

75th

1594 ^{+/- 31}

4093GB database

75th

1580 ^{+/- 24}

512GB database

75th

1573 ^{+/- 59}

900GB Seagate ST900MM0026

75th

1573 ^{+/- 40}

2 x 500GB Seagate ST3500413AS

75th

1569 ^{+/- 51}

299GB PERC H710P

73rd

1471 ^{+/- 145}

18 x 1000GB Western Digital WD1003FBYZ-0

73rd

1465 ^{+/- 127}

4 x 1024GB Samsung SSD 850

73rd

1456 ^{+/- 194}

12 x 1000GB Western Digital WD1003FBYZ-0

72nd

1405 ^{+/- 131}

9GB Amazon Elastic Block Store

71st

1377 ^{+/- 139}

599GB ServeRAID M5110

71st

1348 ^{+/- 30}

1600GB VK1600GECVP

69th

1222 ^{+/- 5}

1000GB MR9270-8i

68th

1158 ^{+/- 15}

56003GB MR9361-8i

66th

1084 ^{+/- 32}

399GB PERC H740P Adp

66th

1067 ^{+/- 62}

419GB PERC H740P Mini

64th

970 ^{+/- 40}

84008GB SMC3108

63rd

913 ^{+/- 100}

128GB OCZ VERTEX4

60th

778 ^{+/- 34}

9 x 1000GB SAMSUNG HD103UJ

58th

663 ^{+/- 2}

30GB KINGSTON SS200S3

55th

516 ^{+/- 8}

6 x 600GB DKR5C-J600SS

54th

475 ^{+/- 41}

Median

50th

375

128GB KLUDG8J1CB-B0B1

44th

217 ^{+/- 3}

128GB MTFDDAK128MAM-1J

42nd

181 ^{+/- 15}

64GB SAMSUNG SSD 830

41st

166 ^{+/- 17}

1000GB Samsung SSD 840

40th

156 ^{+/- 2}

3 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DL003-9VT1

34th

99 ^{+/- 8}

2 x 1000GB MR9260-8i

32nd

82 ^{+/- 1}

250GB Hitachi HTS72502

29th

59 ^{+/- 6}

Low-Tier

25th

< 48

250GB Western Digital WDC WD2500AAJS-0

23rd

38 ^{+/- 1}

2500GB 5

19th

250GB Hitachi HCC54322

18th

28 ^{+/- 4}

1000GB Western Digital WD10JPVT-75A

18th

26 ^{+/- 1}

2 x 250GB Western Digital WDC WD2500JS-75N

17th

25 ^{+/- 1}

2 x 500GB Western Digital WD5003ABYX-0

16th

24 ^{+/- 2}

160GB Western Digital WD1600AAJB-0

16th

23 ^{+/- 2}

2 x 1000GB Western Digital WD1003FBYZ-0

15th

250GB Western Digital WDC WD2500JS-23M

13th

18 ^{+/- 1}

2 x 250GB Seagate ST3250820AS

10th

14 ^{+/- 1}

80GB Western Digital WD800JD-08MS

9th

250GB Seagate ST9250315AS

8th

320GB Seagate ST9320325AS

7th

11 ^{+/- 1}

160GB SAMSUNG HD161HJ

6th

Detailed Performance Overview

Based on OpenBenchmarking.org data, the selected test / test configuration (AIO-Stress 0.21 - Test: Random Write) has an average run-time of 3 minutes. By default this test profile is set to run at least 3 times but may increase if the standard deviation exceeds pre-defined defaults or other calculations deem additional runs necessary for greater statistical accuracy of the result.

Based on public OpenBenchmarking.org results, the selected test / test configuration has an average standard deviation of 8.9%.

Tested CPU Architectures

This benchmark has been successfully tested on the below mentioned architectures. The CPU architectures listed is where successful OpenBenchmarking.org result uploads occurred, namely for helping to determine if a given test is compatible with various alternative CPU architectures.

CPU Architecture

Kernel Identifier

Verified On

Intel / AMD x86 64-bit

x86_64

(Many Processors)

IBM POWER (PowerPC) 64-bit

ppc64le

POWER8, POWER9 16-Core

IBM POWER (PowerPC) 64-bit

ppc64

(Many Processors)

mips64el

ICT Loongson-3A R3

MIPS 64-bit

mips64

ICT Loongson-3A V0.5 FPU V0.1, Loongson-3A R2

Intel / AMD x86 32-bit

i686

(Many Processors)

ARMv7 32-bit

armv7l

ARMv7 Cortex-A72 4-Core, ARMv7 rev 0 2-Core, ARMv7 rev 1 4-Core, ARMv7 rev 10 4-Core, ARMv7 rev 2 16-Core, ARMv7 rev 3 4-Core, ARMv7 rev 3 8-Core, ARMv7 rev 4 2-Core, ARMv7 rev 4 4-Core, ARMv7 rev 5 2-Core, ARMv7 rev 5 4-Core, Exynos ARMv7 rev 0 4-Core, Exynos ARMv7 rev 3 8-Core

ARMv6 32-bit

armv6l

ARMv6-compatible rev 7

ARMv8 64-bit

aarch64

AArch64 rev 4, ARMv8 Cortex-A72 6-Core, ARMv8 rev 0 4-Core, ARMv8 rev 1 4-Core, ARMv8 rev 3 4-Core, ARMv8 rev 3 6-Core, Phytium FT1500A, SiFive RISC-V, phytium FT1500a

amd-ryzen-9-5900x 5 Systems - 31 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core - ASUS PRIME B350M-A - AMD Starship Fedora 39 - 6.8.11-200.fc39.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 45.7
amd-ryzen-9-5900x 5 Systems - 31 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core - ASUS PRIME B350M-A - AMD Starship Fedora 40 - 6.11.10-200.fc40.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 46.6
amd-ryzen-9-5900x 4 Systems - 31 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core - ASUS PRIME B350M-A - AMD Starship Fedora 39 - 6.8.11-200.fc39.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 45.7
mint3800x 3 Systems - 27 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8-Core - ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR - AMD Starship Linuxmint 22 - 6.8.0-49-generic - Cinnamon 6.2.9
mint3800x 3 Systems - 27 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8-Core - ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR - AMD Starship Linuxmint 22 - 6.8.0-49-generic - Cinnamon 6.2.9
mint3800x 3 Systems - 7 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 7 3800X 8-Core - ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR - AMD Starship Linuxmint 22 - 6.8.0-49-generic - Cinnamon 6.2.9
amd-ryzen-9-5900x 4 Systems - 30 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core - ASUS PRIME B350M-A - AMD Starship Fedora 39 - 6.8.11-200.fc39.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 45.7
amd-ryzen-9-5900x 3 Systems - 30 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core - ASUS PRIME B350M-A - AMD Starship Fedora 39 - 6.9.5-100.fc39.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 45.7
amd-ryzen-9-5900x 3 Systems - 28 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core - ASUS PRIME B350M-A - AMD Starship Fedora 39 - 6.9.5-100.fc39.x86_64 - GNOME Shell 45.7
disktestafter 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	Intel Core i5-1035G4 - Oracle VirtualBox v1.2 - Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC openSUSE 15.6 - 6.4.0-150600.21-default - KDE Plasma 5.27.11
diskTESTBefore 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	Intel Core i5-1035G4 - Oracle VirtualBox v1.2 - Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC openSUSE 15.6 - 6.4.0-150600.21-default - KDE Plasma 5.27.11
4X4_Benchmark_10-17-2024-10:43AM 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	AMD Ryzen 7 4800U - ASRock 4X4 BOX 4X4-4000 - AMD Renoir Rocky Linux 9.4 - 5.14.0-427.18.1.el9_4.x86_64 - GCC 11.4.1 20231218
aiodisktest 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	Intel Pentium D - Intel SE7230NH1LX - Intel E7230 ManjaroLinux 24.1.0 - 6.10.11-2-MANJARO - Xfce 4.18
phoronix-test-result 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	Intel Xeon Platinum 8370C - Microsoft Virtual Machine - 1 x 7GB Microsoft Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.5.0-1025-azure - 1.3.255
system_test_1 1 System - 1 Benchmark Result	AMD Ryzen 5 5500U - ASUS X513UA v1.0 - AMD Renoir Ubuntu 22.04 - 6.5.0-26-generic - GNOME Shell 42.9

MickMake UDOO X86 Advanced Plus 20170628 2 Systems - 927 Benchmark Results	Intel Celeron N3160 - SECO UDOO x86 - Intel Atom Debian 9.0 - 4.9.0-3-amd64 - LXDE 0.9.3
MickMake EspressoBin 2G 20170901 6 Systems - 1421 Benchmark Results	Unknown - Marvell Armada 3720 Board - 2048MB Ubuntu 16.04 - 4.4.52-armada-17.06.2-g12feccb - GCC 5.4.0 20160609
staging-xpti-off 3 Systems - 9 Benchmark Results	Intel Xeon E5620 - 10240MB - 40GB Debian unstable - 4.14.0-3-amd64 - GCC 7.2.0
3dn_xeon_broadwell_patched 2 Systems - 601 Benchmark Results	2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6140 - Intel S2600WFT - Intel Device 2020 Debian 9.4 - 4.9.0-6-amd64 - GCC 6.3.0 20170516 + Clang 3.8.1-24
ZFS SSD Benchmark: RAW IMAGE vs QCOW2 vs ZVOL for KVM 6 Systems - 28 Benchmark Results	8 x Intel Celeron_4x0 (Conroe/Merom Class Core 2) - QEMU Standard PC - Intel 440FX- 82441FX PMC Debian 9.1 - 4.9.0-4-amd64 - GCC 6.3.0 20170516
MickMake NanoPC-T4 20180921 (default heatsink) 1 System - 1004 Benchmark Results	SiFive RISC-V - FriendlyElec NanoPC-T4 - Rockchip RK3399 Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.4.138 - LXDE 0.9.3
amitest20180601 2 Systems - 1813 Benchmark Results	Intel Xeon Platinum 8163 - Alibaba Cloud ECS - Intel 440FX- 82441FX PMC Amazon Linux 2 - 4.14.33-59.37.amzn2.x86_64 - GCC 7.3.1 20180303
amitest20180601 3 Systems - 1848 Benchmark Results	Intel Xeon Platinum 8163 - Alibaba Cloud ECS - Intel 440FX- 82441FX PMC Amazon Linux 2 - 4.14.33-59.37.amzn2.x86_64 - GCC 7.3.1 20180303
amitest20180601 3 Systems - 1847 Benchmark Results	Intel Xeon Platinum 8163 - Alibaba Cloud ECS - Intel 440FX- 82441FX PMC Amazon Linux 2 - 4.14.33-59.37.amzn2.x86_64 - GCC 7.3.1 20180303
i7-7700k-msi-z270 1 System - 748 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i7-7700K - MSI Z270 GAMING M7 - Intel Intel Kaby Lake + Z270 Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.15.0-23-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.1
Ubuntu18.04-BM-2400-Evo960 1 System - 211 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core - ASRock X399 Taichi - AMD Family 17h Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.15.0-23-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.1
Mint19-BM-2400-Evo960 1 System - 191 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core - ASRock X399 Taichi - AMD Family 17h LinuxMint 19 - 4.15.0-20-generic - Cinnamon 3.8.6
First run of finalized tests 1 System - 166 Benchmark Results	AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core - ASRock X399 Taichi - AMD Family 17h Ubuntu 18.04 - 4.15.0-23-generic - GNOME Shell 3.28.1
xen-coresched-rfc-bm-smt 7 Systems - 217 Benchmark Results	Intel Xeon W3530 - Dell 09KPNV - Intel 5520 openSUSE Tumbleweed 20190403 - 5.0.5-1-vanilla - GNOME Shell 3.30.2
ltoize 8 Systems - 478 Benchmark Results	Intel Core i9-7980XE - ASRock X299 Taichi XE - Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers Gentoo - 5.0.17-gentoo - X Server 1.20.5

AIO-Stress

Test Created

Last Updated

Test Maintainer

Test Type

Average Install Time

Average Run Time

Test Dependencies

Accolades

Supported Platforms

Revision History

Performance Metrics

AIO-Stress 0.21

Test: Random Write

Tested CPU Architectures

Recent Test Results

Most Popular Test Results