benchmark_20241010_121529

Automated benchmark

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2410129-NE-BENCHMARK82
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
graph-clear-linux-ex130s
October 10
  1 Day, 18 Hours, 17 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


benchmark_20241010_121529OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Xeon Gold 5412U @ 3.90GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads)ASRockRack SPC741D8UD-2T/X550/H (2.07.HZ04 BIOS)Intel Device 1bce4 x 32 GB DDR5-4400MT/s Samsung M321R4GA3BB6-CQKVS2 x 3841GB INTEL SSDPF2KX038T1ASPEED2 x Intel X550Clear Linux OS 424106.10.9-1462.native (x86_64)X ServerGCC 14.2.1 20241002 releases/gcc-14.2.0-204-ge69c03971a + Clang 19.1.0 + LLVM 19.1.0ext41920x1200ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkOSKernelDisplay ServerCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionBenchmark_20241010_121529 PerformanceSystem Logs- Transparent Huge Pages: always- --build=x86_64-generic-linux --disable-libmpx --disable-libunwind-exceptions --disable-multiarch --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-host-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,go,jit --enable-ld=default --enable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-linux-futex --enable-lto --enable-multilib --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --exec-prefix=/usr --includedir=/usr/include --target=x86_64-generic-linux --with-arch=x86-64-v3 --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-glibc-version=2.35 --with-gnu-ld --with-isl --with-pic --with-ppl=yes --with-tune=sapphirerapids --with-zstd - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: default) - CPU Microcode: 0x2b0005c0- gather_data_sampling: Not affected + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + reg_file_data_sampling: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence; BHI: BHI_DIS_S + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

benchmark_20241010_121529ramspeed: Add - Integerramspeed: Copy - Integerramspeed: Scale - Integerramspeed: Triad - Integerramspeed: Average - Integerramspeed: Add - Floating Pointramspeed: Copy - Floating Pointramspeed: Scale - Floating Pointramspeed: Triad - Floating Pointramspeed: Average - Floating Pointstream: Copystream: Scalestream: Triadstream: Addfs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Sizefs-mark: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threadsfs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Sizefs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSynciozone: 1MB - 2GB - Read Performanceiozone: 1MB - 4GB - Read Performanceiozone: 1MB - 8GB - Read Performanceiozone: 2MB - 2GB - Read Performanceiozone: 2MB - 4GB - Read Performanceiozone: 2MB - 8GB - Read Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 2GB - Read Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 4GB - Read Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Read Performanceiozone: 1MB - 2GB - Write Performanceiozone: 1MB - 4GB - Write Performanceiozone: 1MB - 8GB - Write Performanceiozone: 2MB - 2GB - Write Performanceiozone: 2MB - 4GB - Write Performanceiozone: 2MB - 8GB - Write Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 2GB - Write Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 4GB - Write Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Write Performanceiozone: 64Kb - 2GB - Read Performanceiozone: 64Kb - 4GB - Read Performanceiozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Read Performanceiozone: 1MB - 512MB - Read Performanceiozone: 2MB - 512MB - Read Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 512MB - Read Performanceiozone: 64Kb - 2GB - Write Performanceiozone: 64Kb - 4GB - Write Performanceiozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Write Performanceiozone: 1MB - 512MB - Write Performanceiozone: 2MB - 512MB - Write Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 512MB - Write Performanceiozone: 64Kb - 512MB - Read Performanceiozone: 64Kb - 512MB - Write Performancetensorflow: CPU - 1 - VGG-16tensorflow: GPU - 1 - VGG-16tensorflow: CPU - 1 - AlexNettensorflow: CPU - 16 - VGG-16tensorflow: CPU - 32 - VGG-16tensorflow: CPU - 64 - VGG-16tensorflow: GPU - 1 - AlexNettensorflow: GPU - 16 - VGG-16tensorflow: GPU - 32 - VGG-16tensorflow: GPU - 64 - VGG-16tensorflow: CPU - 16 - AlexNettensorflow: CPU - 256 - VGG-16tensorflow: CPU - 32 - AlexNettensorflow: CPU - 512 - VGG-16tensorflow: CPU - 64 - AlexNettensorflow: GPU - 16 - AlexNettensorflow: GPU - 256 - VGG-16tensorflow: GPU - 32 - AlexNettensorflow: GPU - 512 - VGG-16tensorflow: GPU - 64 - AlexNettensorflow: CPU - 1 - GoogLeNettensorflow: CPU - 1 - ResNet-50tensorflow: CPU - 256 - AlexNettensorflow: CPU - 512 - AlexNettensorflow: GPU - 1 - GoogLeNettensorflow: GPU - 1 - ResNet-50tensorflow: GPU - 256 - AlexNettensorflow: GPU - 512 - AlexNettensorflow: CPU - 16 - GoogLeNettensorflow: CPU - 16 - ResNet-50tensorflow: CPU - 32 - GoogLeNettensorflow: CPU - 32 - ResNet-50tensorflow: CPU - 64 - GoogLeNettensorflow: CPU - 64 - ResNet-50tensorflow: GPU - 16 - GoogLeNettensorflow: GPU - 16 - ResNet-50tensorflow: GPU - 32 - GoogLeNettensorflow: GPU - 32 - ResNet-50tensorflow: GPU - 64 - GoogLeNettensorflow: GPU - 64 - ResNet-50tensorflow: CPU - 256 - GoogLeNettensorflow: CPU - 256 - ResNet-50tensorflow: CPU - 512 - GoogLeNettensorflow: CPU - 512 - ResNet-50tensorflow: GPU - 256 - GoogLeNettensorflow: GPU - 256 - ResNet-50tensorflow: GPU - 512 - GoogLeNettensorflow: GPU - 512 - ResNet-50numpy: coremark: CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Secondstockfish: Chess Benchmarkbuild-llvm: Ninjabuild-llvm: Unix Makefilesbuild-linux-kernel: defconfigsysbench: RAM / Memorysysbench: CPUsmallpt: Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samplessqlite: 8sqlite: 16sqlite: 32sqlite: 48graph-clear-linux-ex130s41054.3343281.7041087.1238912.8340209.6440409.7643699.7343813.5340860.1042024.08108423.8109465.8112156.1111824.91552.83076.81593.83350.58636.988720.729078.818188.983072928373.188730.257053.727401.827601.041640.201661.901705.7740885421650.391702.511709.2462.5962.3662.068420.038927.5058593759234.808600.837857.257286.23643.274088542627.19641.471665.411728.9262.178459.83637.699.982.4732.2225.9026.1227.0712.703.363.433.47290.5227.57401.7227.36483.4949.833.5257.343.5260.4255.8516.41574.21594.2026.547.7566.0266.72189.1656.05204.4462.50214.0666.7734.579.6834.399.9234.4710.00216.3966.75215.5868.2335.0810.2235.4110.21548.50924233.62295650248727392.291455.93364.19317046.7156718.993.5022.3523.6355.7318.287OpenBenchmarking.org

RAMspeed SMP

This benchmark tests the system memory (RAM) performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Add - Benchmark: Integergraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 64.46, N = 341054.331. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integergraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 233.90, N = 343281.701. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integergraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 426.65, N = 541087.121. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integergraph-clear-linux-ex130s8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 300.60, N = 338912.831. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Average - Benchmark: Integergraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 163.47, N = 340209.641. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Pointgraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 562.34, N = 340409.761. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Pointgraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 322.24, N = 343699.731. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Pointgraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 595.35, N = 343813.531. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Pointgraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 274.43, N = 340860.101. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterRAMspeed SMP 3.5.0Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Pointgraph-clear-linux-ex130s9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 399.77, N = 342024.081. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

Stream

This is a benchmark of Stream, the popular system memory (RAM) benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterStream 2013-01-17Type: Copygraph-clear-linux-ex130s20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 156.45, N = 5108423.81. (CC) gcc options: -mcmodel=medium -O3 -march=native -fopenmp

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterStream 2013-01-17Type: Scalegraph-clear-linux-ex130s20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 31.43, N = 5109465.81. (CC) gcc options: -mcmodel=medium -O3 -march=native -fopenmp

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterStream 2013-01-17Type: Triadgraph-clear-linux-ex130s20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 23.35, N = 5112156.11. (CC) gcc options: -mcmodel=medium -O3 -march=native -fopenmp

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterStream 2013-01-17Type: Addgraph-clear-linux-ex130s20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 18.13, N = 5111824.91. (CC) gcc options: -mcmodel=medium -O3 -march=native -fopenmp

FS-Mark

FS_Mark is designed to test a system's file-system performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Sizegraph-clear-linux-ex130s30060090012001500SE +/- 9.54, N = 31552.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threadsgraph-clear-linux-ex130s7001400210028003500SE +/- 57.79, N = 153076.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Sizegraph-clear-linux-ex130s30060090012001500SE +/- 10.95, N = 31593.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSyncgraph-clear-linux-ex130s7001400210028003500SE +/- 18.43, N = 33350.5

IOzone

The IOzone benchmark tests the hard disk drive / file-system performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 43.31, N = 38636.981. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 69.82, N = 38720.721. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 89.18, N = 39078.811. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 64.89, N = 38188.981. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 75.51, N = 38373.181. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 16.74, N = 38730.251. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s15003000450060007500SE +/- 36.20, N = 37053.721. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s16003200480064008000SE +/- 63.86, N = 37401.821. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s16003200480064008000SE +/- 44.08, N = 37601.041. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 16.01, N = 151640.201. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 11.25, N = 31661.901. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 4.53, N = 31705.771. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 18.68, N = 31650.391. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 3.45, N = 31702.511. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 8.84, N = 31709.241. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s1428425670SE +/- 0.47, N = 362.591. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s1428425670SE +/- 0.36, N = 362.361. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s1428425670SE +/- 0.19, N = 362.061. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 112.98, N = 38420.031. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 74.23, N = 38927.511. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 45.17, N = 39234.801. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 13.60, N = 38600.831. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 107.77, N = 37857.251. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s16003200480064008000SE +/- 82.81, N = 37286.231. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s140280420560700SE +/- 1.15, N = 3643.271. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s140280420560700SE +/- 6.48, N = 5627.191. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s140280420560700SE +/- 6.11, N = 3641.471. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 8.05, N = 31665.411. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 2MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s400800120016002000SE +/- 11.10, N = 31728.921. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s1428425670SE +/- 0.32, N = 362.171. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 92.87, N = 38459.831. (CC) gcc options: -O3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performancegraph-clear-linux-ex130s140280420560700SE +/- 3.36, N = 3637.691. (CC) gcc options: -O3

TensorFlow

This is a benchmark of the TensorFlow deep learning framework using the TensorFlow reference benchmarks (tensorflow/benchmarks with tf_cnn_benchmarks.py). Note with the Phoronix Test Suite there is also pts/tensorflow-lite for benchmarking the TensorFlow Lite binaries if desired for complementary metrics. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 39.98

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.55581.11161.66742.22322.779SE +/- 0.02, N = 32.47

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s714212835SE +/- 0.05, N = 332.22

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s612182430SE +/- 0.01, N = 325.90

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s612182430SE +/- 0.02, N = 326.12

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s612182430SE +/- 0.03, N = 327.07

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.10, N = 312.70

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.7561.5122.2683.0243.78SE +/- 0.01, N = 33.36

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.77181.54362.31543.08723.859SE +/- 0.00, N = 33.43

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.78081.56162.34243.12323.904SE +/- 0.00, N = 33.47

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s60120180240300SE +/- 0.52, N = 3290.52

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s612182430SE +/- 0.03, N = 327.57

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s90180270360450SE +/- 0.94, N = 3401.72

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s612182430SE +/- 0.03, N = 327.36

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s100200300400500SE +/- 0.81, N = 3483.49

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s1122334455SE +/- 0.06, N = 349.83

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.7921.5842.3763.1683.96SE +/- 0.00, N = 33.52

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s1326395265SE +/- 0.18, N = 357.34

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: VGG-16graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.7921.5842.3763.1683.96SE +/- 0.00, N = 33.52

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s1428425670SE +/- 0.57, N = 360.42

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s1326395265SE +/- 0.36, N = 355.85

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s48121620SE +/- 0.01, N = 316.41

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s120240360480600SE +/- 0.60, N = 3574.21

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s130260390520650SE +/- 6.56, N = 5594.20

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s612182430SE +/- 0.14, N = 326.54

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 1 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s246810SE +/- 0.04, N = 37.75

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s1530456075SE +/- 0.11, N = 366.02

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: AlexNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s1530456075SE +/- 0.06, N = 366.72

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s4080120160200SE +/- 0.57, N = 3189.16

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s1326395265SE +/- 0.07, N = 356.05

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s4080120160200SE +/- 0.30, N = 3204.44

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s1428425670SE +/- 0.12, N = 362.50

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s50100150200250SE +/- 0.02, N = 3214.06

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s1530456075SE +/- 0.05, N = 366.77

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s816243240SE +/- 0.23, N = 334.57

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 16 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.02, N = 39.68

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s816243240SE +/- 0.08, N = 334.39

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 32 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.03, N = 39.92

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s816243240SE +/- 0.06, N = 334.47

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 64 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 310.00

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s50100150200250SE +/- 0.19, N = 3216.39

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s1530456075SE +/- 0.18, N = 366.75

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s50100150200250SE +/- 0.03, N = 3215.58

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: CPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s1530456075SE +/- 0.14, N = 368.23

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s816243240SE +/- 0.02, N = 335.08

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 256 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 310.22

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: GoogLeNetgraph-clear-linux-ex130s816243240SE +/- 0.03, N = 335.41

OpenBenchmarking.orgimages/sec, More Is BetterTensorFlow 2.16.1Device: GPU - Batch Size: 512 - Model: ResNet-50graph-clear-linux-ex130s3691215SE +/- 0.02, N = 310.21

Numpy Benchmark

This is a test to obtain the general Numpy performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterNumpy Benchmarkgraph-clear-linux-ex130s120240360480600SE +/- 0.55, N = 3548.50

Coremark

This is a test of EEMBC CoreMark processor benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations/Sec, More Is BetterCoremark 1.0CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Secondgraph-clear-linux-ex130s200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 807.17, N = 3924233.621. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt

Stockfish

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterStockfish 17Chess Benchmarkgraph-clear-linux-ex130s11M22M33M44M55MSE +/- 1627957.42, N = 12502487271. (CXX) g++ options: -lgcov -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++17 -fno-peel-loops -fno-tracer -pedantic -O3 -funroll-loops -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -mavx2 -mbmi -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512vnni -mavx512dq -mavx512vl -msse4.1 -mssse3 -msse2 -mbmi2 -flto -flto-partition=one -flto=jobserver

Timed LLVM Compilation

This test times how long it takes to compile/build the LLVM compiler stack. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed LLVM Compilation 16.0Build System: Ninjagraph-clear-linux-ex130s90180270360450SE +/- 0.42, N = 3392.29

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed LLVM Compilation 16.0Build System: Unix Makefilesgraph-clear-linux-ex130s100200300400500SE +/- 1.00, N = 3455.93

Timed Linux Kernel Compilation

This test times how long it takes to build the Linux kernel in a default configuration (defconfig) for the architecture being tested or alternatively an allmodconfig for building all possible kernel modules for the build. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 6.8Build: defconfiggraph-clear-linux-ex130s1428425670SE +/- 0.81, N = 364.19

Build: allmodconfig

graph-clear-linux-ex130s: The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status. E: cc1: error: failed to initialize plugin ./scripts/gcc-plugins/latent_entropy_plugin.so

Sysbench

This is a benchmark of Sysbench with the built-in CPU and memory sub-tests. Sysbench is a scriptable multi-threaded benchmark tool based on LuaJIT. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/sec, More Is BetterSysbench 1.0.20Test: RAM / Memorygraph-clear-linux-ex130s4K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 64.18, N = 317046.711. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -funroll-loops -rdynamic -ldl -laio -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgEvents Per Second, More Is BetterSysbench 1.0.20Test: CPUgraph-clear-linux-ex130s12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 2.33, N = 356718.991. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -funroll-loops -rdynamic -ldl -laio -lm

Smallpt

Smallpt is a C++ global illumination renderer written in less than 100 lines of code. Global illumination is done via unbiased Monte Carlo path tracing and there is multi-threading support via the OpenMP library. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSmallpt 1.0Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samplesgraph-clear-linux-ex130s0.7881.5762.3643.1523.94SE +/- 0.042, N = 153.5021. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -O3

SQLite

This is a simple benchmark of SQLite. At present this test profile just measures the time to perform a pre-defined number of insertions on an indexed database with a variable number of concurrent repetitions -- up to the maximum number of CPU threads available. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

Threads / Copies: 1

graph-clear-linux-ex130s: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Threads / Copies: 2

graph-clear-linux-ex130s: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

Threads / Copies: 4

graph-clear-linux-ex130s: The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result. The test run did not produce a result.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.41.2Threads / Copies: 8graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.52921.05841.58762.11682.646SE +/- 0.021, N = 32.3521. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ledit -ltinfo -lz -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.41.2Threads / Copies: 16graph-clear-linux-ex130s0.81791.63582.45373.27164.0895SE +/- 0.032, N = 153.6351. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ledit -ltinfo -lz -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.41.2Threads / Copies: 32graph-clear-linux-ex130s1.28952.5793.86855.1586.4475SE +/- 0.007, N = 35.7311. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ledit -ltinfo -lz -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.41.2Threads / Copies: 48graph-clear-linux-ex130s246810SE +/- 0.062, N = 158.2871. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ledit -ltinfo -lz -lm

111 Results Shown

RAMspeed SMP:
  Add - Integer
  Copy - Integer
  Scale - Integer
  Triad - Integer
  Average - Integer
  Add - Floating Point
  Copy - Floating Point
  Scale - Floating Point
  Triad - Floating Point
  Average - Floating Point
Stream:
  Copy
  Scale
  Triad
  Add
FS-Mark:
  1000 Files, 1MB Size
  5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads
  4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size
  1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync
IOzone:
  1MB - 2GB - Read Performance
  1MB - 4GB - Read Performance
  1MB - 8GB - Read Performance
  2MB - 2GB - Read Performance
  2MB - 4GB - Read Performance
  2MB - 8GB - Read Performance
  4Kb - 2GB - Read Performance
  4Kb - 4GB - Read Performance
  4Kb - 8GB - Read Performance
  1MB - 2GB - Write Performance
  1MB - 4GB - Write Performance
  1MB - 8GB - Write Performance
  2MB - 2GB - Write Performance
  2MB - 4GB - Write Performance
  2MB - 8GB - Write Performance
  4Kb - 2GB - Write Performance
  4Kb - 4GB - Write Performance
  4Kb - 8GB - Write Performance
  64Kb - 2GB - Read Performance
  64Kb - 4GB - Read Performance
  64Kb - 8GB - Read Performance
  1MB - 512MB - Read Performance
  2MB - 512MB - Read Performance
  4Kb - 512MB - Read Performance
  64Kb - 2GB - Write Performance
  64Kb - 4GB - Write Performance
  64Kb - 8GB - Write Performance
  1MB - 512MB - Write Performance
  2MB - 512MB - Write Performance
  4Kb - 512MB - Write Performance
  64Kb - 512MB - Read Performance
  64Kb - 512MB - Write Performance
TensorFlow:
  CPU - 1 - VGG-16
  GPU - 1 - VGG-16
  CPU - 1 - AlexNet
  CPU - 16 - VGG-16
  CPU - 32 - VGG-16
  CPU - 64 - VGG-16
  GPU - 1 - AlexNet
  GPU - 16 - VGG-16
  GPU - 32 - VGG-16
  GPU - 64 - VGG-16
  CPU - 16 - AlexNet
  CPU - 256 - VGG-16
  CPU - 32 - AlexNet
  CPU - 512 - VGG-16
  CPU - 64 - AlexNet
  GPU - 16 - AlexNet
  GPU - 256 - VGG-16
  GPU - 32 - AlexNet
  GPU - 512 - VGG-16
  GPU - 64 - AlexNet
  CPU - 1 - GoogLeNet
  CPU - 1 - ResNet-50
  CPU - 256 - AlexNet
  CPU - 512 - AlexNet
  GPU - 1 - GoogLeNet
  GPU - 1 - ResNet-50
  GPU - 256 - AlexNet
  GPU - 512 - AlexNet
  CPU - 16 - GoogLeNet
  CPU - 16 - ResNet-50
  CPU - 32 - GoogLeNet
  CPU - 32 - ResNet-50
  CPU - 64 - GoogLeNet
  CPU - 64 - ResNet-50
  GPU - 16 - GoogLeNet
  GPU - 16 - ResNet-50
  GPU - 32 - GoogLeNet
  GPU - 32 - ResNet-50
  GPU - 64 - GoogLeNet
  GPU - 64 - ResNet-50
  CPU - 256 - GoogLeNet
  CPU - 256 - ResNet-50
  CPU - 512 - GoogLeNet
  CPU - 512 - ResNet-50
  GPU - 256 - GoogLeNet
  GPU - 256 - ResNet-50
  GPU - 512 - GoogLeNet
  GPU - 512 - ResNet-50
Numpy Benchmark
Coremark
Stockfish
Timed LLVM Compilation:
  Ninja
  Unix Makefiles
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation
Sysbench:
  RAM / Memory
  CPU
Smallpt
SQLite:
  8
  16
  32
  48