Intel Core i9-10850K testing with a ASUS ROG MAXIMUS XII APEX (2701 BIOS) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 12GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
i9-10850K Processor: Intel Core i9-10850K @ 5.20GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG MAXIMUS XII APEX (2701 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 12GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ROG PG259QN, Network: Intel Device 15f3 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-88-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.9, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13, Display Driver: NVIDIA 545.23.06, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Vulkan: 1.3.260, Compiler: GCC 9.4.0 + CUDA 12.3, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0xf8 - Thermald 1.9.1Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.20.1+1-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04)Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Mitigation of Microcode + itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of VMX disabled + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + retbleed: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence + srbds: Mitigation of Microcode + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 2.23, N = 3 119.24 MAX: 26684.41
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
i9-10850K: The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 1183.84, N = 3 352557
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.29, N = 3 115.37 MAX: 25435.9
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
i9-10850K: The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 3602.46, N = 3 550422
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 119.73 MAX: 25743.42
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
i9-10850K: The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 2202.87, N = 10 280380
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 0.62, N = 10 63.71 MAX: 23934.95
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
i9-10850K: The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 3074.15, N = 3 672408
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.47, N = 3 66.44 MAX: 23943.01
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
i9-10850K: The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 7208.33, N = 3 1047089
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 67.51 MAX: 23999.92
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
i9-10850K: The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 5917.01, N = 7 657649
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.25, N = 7 28.03 MAX: 15090.81
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 8178.17, N = 4 659462
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.11, N = 4 106.71 MAX: 27809.17
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 18347.26, N = 3 1485313
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 31.12 MAX: 13859.76
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 7320.52, N = 3 1514093
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.72, N = 3 114.55 MAX: 26461.84
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 11698.76, N = 3 2187881
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.18, N = 3 33.70 MAX: 12614.48
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 16044.36, N = 3 2173506
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.39, N = 3 126.55 MAX: 26298.13
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 5145.14, N = 3 994792
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 18.71 MAX: 23892.52
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 2723.80, N = 3 1008098
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 72.57 MAX: 26207.42
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 14992.64, N = 3 2083525
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 22.58 MAX: 23931.04
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 16702.15, N = 3 2148382
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.85, N = 3 85.03 MAX: 27105.28
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 34979.15, N = 3 2907650
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 25.98 MAX: 23942.84
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 600K 1200K 1800K 2400K 3000K SE +/- 30864.37, N = 5 2943310
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 1 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.81, N = 5 99.23 MAX: 26410.36
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 3M 6M 9M 12M 15M SE +/- 20022.23, N = 3 12778793
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.83, N = 3 124.72 MAX: 25630.22
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
i9-10850K: The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 6M 12M 18M 24M 30M SE +/- 191818.62, N = 15 26110651
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.89, N = 15 152.99 MAX: 27739.4
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
i9-10850K: The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 7M 14M 21M 28M 35M SE +/- 183724.83, N = 3 33935543
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 2.51, N = 3 186.53 MAX: 27452.98
Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
i9-10850K: The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 5M 10M 15M 20M 25M SE +/- 148257.23, N = 13 22157436
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.83, N = 13 77.83 MAX: 24027.71
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400
i9-10850K: The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 8M 16M 24M 32M 40M SE +/- 463353.16, N = 3 39233784
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.90, N = 3 108.93 MAX: 24316.56
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400
i9-10850K: The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 10M 20M 30M 40M 50M SE +/- 343951.85, N = 3 48388725
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.66, N = 3 140.22 MAX: 24185.56
Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400
i9-10850K: The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status. The test quit with a non-zero exit status.
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 8M 16M 24M 32M 40M SE +/- 412221.66, N = 4 37458672
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.67, N = 4 48.37 MAX: 12602.38
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 8M 16M 24M 32M 40M SE +/- 182283.51, N = 3 36943198
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 172.13 MAX: 27030.77
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 11M 22M 33M 44M 55M SE +/- 226866.15, N = 3 51765037
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 89.06 MAX: 11459.87
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 11M 22M 33M 44M 55M SE +/- 196221.81, N = 3 51780533
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.13, N = 3 303.54 MAX: 26781.65
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 12M 24M 36M 48M 60M SE +/- 271788.77, N = 3 55446116
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.99, N = 3 134.99 MAX: 11407.05
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 12M 24M 36M 48M 60M SE +/- 406887.93, N = 3 56627813
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 6.08, N = 3 437.96 MAX: 26952.39
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 10M 20M 30M 40M 50M SE +/- 491863.82, N = 3 44362489
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 42.44 MAX: 23919.19
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 10M 20M 30M 40M 50M SE +/- 61020.81, N = 3 44769524
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.86, N = 3 160.24 MAX: 26649.61
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 12M 24M 36M 48M 60M SE +/- 100402.64, N = 3 54878147
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 86.86 MAX: 23990.34
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 12M 24M 36M 48M 60M SE +/- 675395.21, N = 3 56294648
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 6.03, N = 3 322.56 MAX: 26606.87
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 11M 22M 33M 44M 55M SE +/- 65505.62, N = 3 50375602
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100 i9-10850K 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.35, N = 3 151.94 MAX: 23948.6
OpenBenchmarking.org point/sec, More Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 11M 22M 33M 44M 55M SE +/- 490776.31, N = 3 52795568
OpenBenchmarking.org Average Latency, Fewer Is Better Apache IoTDB 1.2 Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400 i9-10850K 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 6.88, N = 3 557.09 MAX: 26830.99
i9-10850K Processor: Intel Core i9-10850K @ 5.20GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG MAXIMUS XII APEX (2701 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 12GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ROG PG259QN, Network: Intel Device 15f3 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.15.0-88-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.9, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13, Display Driver: NVIDIA 545.23.06, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Vulkan: 1.3.260, Compiler: GCC 9.4.0 + CUDA 12.3, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madviseProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance (EPP: performance) - CPU Microcode: 0xf8 - Thermald 1.9.1Java Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.20.1+1-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04)Security Notes: gather_data_sampling: Mitigation of Microcode + itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of VMX disabled + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + retbleed: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS + spec_rstack_overflow: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence + srbds: Mitigation of Microcode + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Testing initiated at 6 November 2023 04:19 by user michaelajarman.