icl new

Intel Core i7-1165G7 testing with a Dell 0GG9PT (3.15.0 BIOS) and Intel Xe TGL GT2 15GB on Ubuntu 23.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2309247-SYST-ICLNEW681
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
a
September 24 2023
  6 Hours, 40 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


icl newOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i7-1165G7 @ 4.70GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads)Dell 0GG9PT (3.15.0 BIOS)Intel Tiger Lake-LP16GBKioxia KBG40ZNS256G NVMe 256GB + 2 x 0GB MassStorageClassIntel Xe TGL GT2 15GB (1300MHz)Realtek ALC289Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201Ubuntu 23.106.3.0-7-generic (x86_64)GNOME ShellX Server + Wayland4.6 Mesa 23.1.7-1ubuntu1GCC 13.2.0ext41920x1200ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionIcl New BenchmarksSystem Logs- Transparent Huge Pages: madvise- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave (EPP: balance_performance) - CPU Microcode: 0xac - Thermald 2.5.4 - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 17.0.9-ea+4-Ubuntu-1)- itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + mmio_stale_data: Not affected + retbleed: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced / Automatic IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

icl newapache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 800 - 400apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 800 - 400apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 800 - 100apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 800 - 100apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 500 - 400apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 500 - 400apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 500 - 100apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 500 - 100apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 200 - 400apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 200 - 400apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 200 - 100apache-iotdb: 800 - 100 - 200 - 100apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 800 - 400apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 800 - 400apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 800 - 100apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 800 - 100apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 500 - 400apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 500 - 400apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 500 - 100apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 500 - 100apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 200 - 400apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 200 - 400apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 200 - 100apache-iotdb: 500 - 100 - 200 - 100apache-iotdb: 200 - 100 - 800 - 100apache-iotdb: 200 - 100 - 800 - 100apache-iotdb: 200 - 100 - 500 - 100apache-iotdb: 200 - 100 - 500 - 100apache-iotdb: 200 - 100 - 200 - 100apache-iotdb: 200 - 100 - 200 - 100apache-iotdb: 100 - 100 - 800 - 100apache-iotdb: 100 - 100 - 800 - 100apache-iotdb: 100 - 100 - 500 - 100apache-iotdb: 100 - 100 - 500 - 100apache-iotdb: 100 - 100 - 200 - 100apache-iotdb: 100 - 100 - 200 - 100openradioss: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Containeropenradioss: Rubber O-Ring Seal Installationopenradioss: Bird Strike on Windshieldopenradioss: Cell Phone Drop Testopenradioss: Chrysler Neon 1Mopenradioss: Bumper Beamapache-iotdb: 100 - 100 - 200 - 400a1369.04199464771209.1265115462432.147613954606.858060607668.911106651163.09111591742839.878819483869.3488604981201.2511956564397.2411980969338.5417595086105.4217524343522.4613290642218.0519760321115.0914329565300.7119917130216.5617659905163.797680521390.34499.85685.29255.032300.69331.48OpenBenchmarking.org

Apache IoTDB

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400a300600900120015001369.04MAX: 118929.99

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400a4M8M12M16M20M19946477

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100a300600900120015001209.12MAX: 25037.55

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100a1.4M2.8M4.2M5.6M7M6511546

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400a50010001500200025002432.14MAX: 39917.88

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400a1.6M3.2M4.8M6.4M8M7613954

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100a130260390520650606.85MAX: 24986.94

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100a2M4M6M8M10M8060607

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400a140280420560700668.9MAX: 36810.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400a2M4M6M8M10M11106651

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100a4080120160200163.09MAX: 24658.96

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 800 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100a2M4M6M8M10M11159174

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400a60012001800240030002839.87MAX: 33513.55

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400a2M4M6M8M10M8819483

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100a2004006008001000869.34MAX: 14685.76

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100a2M4M6M8M10M8860498

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400a300600900120015001201.25MAX: 30349.14

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 400a3M6M9M12M15M11956564

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100a90180270360450397.24MAX: 15005.74

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100a3M6M9M12M15M11980969

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400a70140210280350338.54MAX: 26942.05

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400a4M8M12M16M20M17595086

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100a20406080100105.42MAX: 15521.75

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 500 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100a4M8M12M16M20M17524343

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100a110220330440550522.46MAX: 24770.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100a3M6M9M12M15M13290642

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100a50100150200250218.05MAX: 25664.86

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100a4M8M12M16M20M19760321

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100a306090120150115.09MAX: 25361.72

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 200 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100a3M6M9M12M15M14329565

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100a70140210280350300.71MAX: 26395.54

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 100a4M8M12M16M20M19917130

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100a50100150200250216.56MAX: 26040.42

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 500 - Client Number: 100a4M8M12M16M20M17659905

OpenBenchmarking.orgAverage Latency, Fewer Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100a4080120160200163.7MAX: 25665.27

OpenBenchmarking.orgpoint/sec, More Is BetterApache IoTDB 1.2Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 100a2M4M6M8M10M9768052

OpenRadioss

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenRadioss 2023.09.15Model: INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Containera300600900120015001390.34

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenRadioss 2023.09.15Model: Rubber O-Ring Seal Installationa110220330440550499.85

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenRadioss 2023.09.15Model: Bird Strike on Windshielda150300450600750685.29

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenRadioss 2023.09.15Model: Cell Phone Drop Testa60120180240300255.03

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenRadioss 2023.09.15Model: Chrysler Neon 1Ma50010001500200025002300.69

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenRadioss 2023.09.15Model: Bumper Beama70140210280350331.48

Apache IoTDB

Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 800 - Client Number: 400

a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.

Device Count: 100 - Batch Size Per Write: 100 - Sensor Count: 200 - Client Number: 400

a: The test quit with a non-zero exit status.

42 Results Shown

Apache IoTDB:
  800 - 100 - 800 - 400:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  800 - 100 - 800 - 100:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  800 - 100 - 500 - 400:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  800 - 100 - 500 - 100:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  800 - 100 - 200 - 400:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  800 - 100 - 200 - 100:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  500 - 100 - 800 - 400:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  500 - 100 - 800 - 100:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  500 - 100 - 500 - 400:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  500 - 100 - 500 - 100:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  500 - 100 - 200 - 400:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  500 - 100 - 200 - 100:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  200 - 100 - 800 - 100:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  200 - 100 - 500 - 100:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  200 - 100 - 200 - 100:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  100 - 100 - 800 - 100:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  100 - 100 - 500 - 100:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
  100 - 100 - 200 - 100:
    Average Latency
    point/sec
OpenRadioss:
  INIVOL and Fluid Structure Interaction Drop Container
  Rubber O-Ring Seal Installation
  Bird Strike on Windshield
  Cell Phone Drop Test
  Chrysler Neon 1M
  Bumper Beam