omega

fatty

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2205195-NE-OMEGA680989
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results
Show Result Confidence Charts
Allow Limiting Results To Certain Suite(s)

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Toggle/Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
alpha
May 19 2022
  3 Minutes
fatty
May 19 2022
  40 Minutes
Invert Behavior (Only Show Selected Data)
  21 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


omegaProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionalphafattyIntel 0000 @ 2.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads)Supermicro X10SRA v1.01 (2.0a BIOS)Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon32GB960GB TOSHIBA TR150 + 120GB SPCC Solid State + 500GB Samsung SSD 850 + 60GB Toshiba MKNSSDEC60GBMSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970Realtek ALC1150Acer X233H2 x Intel I210Fedora Linux 365.17.7-300.fc36.x86_64 (x86_64)Xfce 4.16X Server 1.20.14NVIDIA 510.68.024.6.0GCC 12.1.1 20220507 + Clang 14.0.0 + LLVM 14.0.0ext41920x1080OpenBenchmarking.orgKernel Details- Transparent Huge Pages: madviseEnvironment Details- DEBUGINFOD_URLS=https://debuginfod.fedoraproject.org/Processor Details- Scaling Governor: intel_cpufreq performance - CPU Microcode: 0x14Python Details- Python 3.10.4Security Details- SELinux + itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of VMX disabled + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT vulnerable + mds: Vulnerable: Clear buffers attempted no microcode; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Vulnerable + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Retpolines STIBP: disabled RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

omegapybench: Total For Average Test Timespyperformance: gopyperformance: 2to3pyperformance: chaospyperformance: floatpyperformance: nbodypyperformance: pathlibpyperformance: raytracepyperformance: json_loadspyperformance: crypto_pyaespyperformance: regex_compilepyperformance: python_startuppyperformance: django_templatepyperformance: pickle_pure_pythonalphafatty208640956419519627433.987943.721931416.784.2806OpenBenchmarking.org

PyBench

This test profile reports the total time of the different average timed test results from PyBench. PyBench reports average test times for different functions such as BuiltinFunctionCalls and NestedForLoops, with this total result providing a rough estimate as to Python's average performance on a given system. This test profile runs PyBench each time for 20 rounds. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2018-02-16Total For Average Test Timesalpha400800120016002000SE +/- 4.91, N = 32086

PyPerformance

PyPerformance is the reference Python performance benchmark suite. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: gofatty90180270360450SE +/- 0.33, N = 3409

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: 2to3fatty120240360480600SE +/- 1.76, N = 3564

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: chaosfatty4080120160200SE +/- 0.00, N = 3195

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: floatfatty4080120160200SE +/- 0.00, N = 3196

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: nbodyfatty60120180240300SE +/- 0.33, N = 3274

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: pathlibfatty816243240SE +/- 0.09, N = 333.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: raytracefatty2004006008001000SE +/- 0.88, N = 3879

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: json_loadsfatty1020304050SE +/- 0.03, N = 343.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: crypto_pyaesfatty50100150200250SE +/- 0.00, N = 3219

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: regex_compilefatty70140210280350SE +/- 0.33, N = 3314

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: python_startupfatty48121620SE +/- 0.07, N = 316.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: django_templatefatty20406080100SE +/- 0.07, N = 384.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: pickle_pure_pythonfatty2004006008001000SE +/- 0.33, N = 3806