Intel Core i9 12900K Core Configurations Linux

Intel Core i9-12900K core benchmarks for a future article on Phoronix.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2112132-TJ-INTELCORE64
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

AV1 4 Tests
Web Browsers 1 Tests
Chess Test Suite 3 Tests
Timed Code Compilation 4 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 12 Tests
Compression Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 15 Tests
Creator Workloads 19 Tests
Cryptography 3 Tests
Desktop Graphics 2 Tests
Encoding 6 Tests
Game Development 6 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 4 Tests
Imaging 5 Tests
Machine Learning 2 Tests
Molecular Dynamics 2 Tests
Multi-Core 22 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 3 Tests
Intel oneAPI 3 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 5 Tests
Python Tests 5 Tests
Renderers 2 Tests
Scientific Computing 2 Tests
Server CPU Tests 11 Tests
Texture Compression 3 Tests
Video Encoding 6 Tests
Common Workstation Benchmarks 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
1 P + 8 E
December 13 2021
  6 Hours, 25 Minutes
1 P + HT + 8 E
December 12 2021
  6 Hours, 21 Minutes
8 P + HT
December 12 2021
  3 Hours, 50 Minutes
8 P + 8 E
December 12 2021
  6 Hours, 6 Minutes
8 P + HT + 8 E
December 11 2021
  5 Hours, 55 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  5 Hours, 43 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

1 P + 8 E

Processor: Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (9 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (0803 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7aa7, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0, Graphics: Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 16GB (2575/1000MHz), Audio: Intel Device 7ad0, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411

OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.15.7-051507-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2 (LLVM 12.0.1), Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave (EPP: balance_performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x15 - Thermald 2.4.6
Graphics Notes: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 16368 MB
Python Notes: Python 3.9.7
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

1 P + HT + 8 E

Changed Processor to Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (9 Cores / 10 Threads).

8 P + HT

Changed Processor to Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads).

8 P + 8 E

Changed Processor to Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (16 Cores).

8 P + HT + 8 E

Changed Processor to Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (16 Cores / 24 Threads).

Intel Core i9 12900K Core Configurations LinuxOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (9 Cores)Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (9 Cores / 10 Threads)Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (16 Cores)Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (16 Cores / 24 Threads)ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (0803 BIOS)Intel Device 7aa764GB1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 16GB (2575/1000MHz)Intel Device 7ad0ASUS VP28UIntel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411Ubuntu 21.105.15.7-051507-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 40.5X Server 1.20.13 + Wayland4.6 Mesa 21.2.2 (LLVM 12.0.1)1.2.182GCC 11.2.0ext43840x2160ProcessorsMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerOpenGLVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionIntel Core I9 12900K Core Configurations Linux BenchmarksSystem Logs- Transparent Huge Pages: madvise- --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave (EPP: balance_performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x15 - Thermald 2.4.6 - BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 16368 MB- Python 3.9.7- itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 EResult OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%191%283%374%465%CLOMPPrimesieveOSPrayEmbreeOpenSSLBlenderNAMDXmrigStockfishPlaidMLASTC EncoderSVT-HEVCCoremarkONNX RuntimeIntel Open Image Denoise7-Zip CompressionSVT-VP9Timed Linux Kernel CompilationTimed FFmpeg CompilationSVT-AV1Timed Godot Game Engine CompilationTimed Mesa CompilationGROMACSlibavif avifencSysbenchBasis UniversalXonoticUnvanquishedAOM AV1RawTherapeeZstd CompressionSecureMarkKTX-Software toktxSeleniumrav1eHuginJPEG XL libjxlTesseractTSCPCraftyLibRaw

1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 EPer Watt Result OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%165%229%294%358%CLOMPMeta Performance Per WattsSysbenchSVT-VP9SVT-HEVCCoremark7-Zip CompressionOpenSSLStockfishZstd CompressionOSPrayrav1eLibRawAOM AV1TSCPTesseractPlaidMLSVT-AV1EmbreeIntel Open Image DenoiseONNX RuntimeSeleniumXmrigXonoticSecureMarkCraftyUnvanquishedGROMACSJPEG XL libjxlP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.MP.W.G.M

Intel Core i9 12900K Core Configurations Linuxtesseract: 1920 x 1080tesseract: 3840 x 2160xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimateunvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - Highunvanquished: 1920 x 1080 - Ultraunvanquished: 3840 x 2160 - Highunvanquished: 3840 x 2160 - Ultranamd: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atomsgromacs: MPI CPU - water_GMX50_barexmrig: Monero - 1Mxmrig: Wownero - 1Mcompress-zstd: 19 - Compression Speedcompress-zstd: 19 - Decompression Speedcompress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speedcompress-zstd: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speedcompress-7zip: Compression Ratingcompress-7zip: Decompression Ratingavifenc: 2avifenc: 6avifenc: 6, Losslessastcenc: Thoroughastcenc: Exhaustivejpegxl: JPEG - 8jpegxl: PNG - 8hugin: Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Timerawtherapee: Total Benchmark Timelibraw: Post-Processing Benchmarkbasis: ETC1Sbasis: UASTC Level 3toktx: Zstd Compression 9toktx: Zstd Compression 19toktx: UASTC 3toktx: UASTC 3 + Zstd Compression 19toktx: UASTC 4 + Zstd Compression 19clomp: Static OMP Speedupprimesieve: 1e12 Prime Number Generationsvt-av1: Preset 8 - Bosphorus 4Ksvt-vp9: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Bosphorus 1080psvt-vp9: VMAF Optimized - Bosphorus 1080psvt-hevc: 7 - Bosphorus 1080psvt-hevc: 10 - Bosphorus 1080prav1e: 10rav1e: 6rav1e: 5aom-av1: Speed 10 Realtime - Bosphorus 4Kaom-av1: Speed 9 Realtime - Bosphorus 4Kaom-av1: Speed 6 Realtime - Bosphorus 4Kospray: NASA Streamlines - SciVisospray: NASA Streamlines - Path Tracerembree: Pathtracer - Crownembree: Pathtracer ISPC - Crownoidn: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x2160coremark: CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Secondsecuremark: SecureMark-TLSsynthmark: VoiceMark_100stockfish: Total Timetscp: AI Chess Performancecrafty: Elapsed Timebuild-godot: Time To Compilebuild-linux-kernel: Time To Compilebuild-mesa: Time To Compilebuild-ffmpeg: Time To Compileopenssl: RSA4096openssl: RSA4096openssl: SHA256plaidml: No - Inference - VGG16 - CPUplaidml: No - Inference - VGG19 - CPUonnx: yolov4 - CPUonnx: fcn-resnet101-11 - CPUonnx: shufflenet-v2-10 - CPUonnx: super-resolution-10 - CPUsysbench: CPUselenium: Jetstream 2 - Google Chromeselenium: StyleBench - Google Chromeselenium: PSPDFKit WASM - Google Chromeselenium: WASM collisionDetection - Google Chromeselenium: WASM imageConvolute - Google Chromeselenium: Kraken - Google Chromeblender: BMW27 - CPU-Only1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E615.9745641.0057314.3699942248.9138446278.2258.6276.3254.62.264280.8562946.23183.926.93099.218.93656.3529473607651.42817.81962.98513.4627120.755030.780.9348.82261.04639.2029.13665.3803.41720.82714.91520.953389.8444.654.05210.501154.27152.5084.87183.918.3112.9112.21653.9549.448.4710.992.206.47436.56680.19288049.005032244752650.5931800995113349648462623144.284112.59954.67663.5841243.580958.8111074023779.627.602343422717193031830.78161.28742.93098413.4928.53760.3216.97654.7070670.6529314.5100447254.5921067266.2263.5264.2246.82.075910.8453339.03606.528.13552.919.53178.9547154113839.65913.07059.60212.4518112.476928.130.7237.50250.98751.7422.40261.5512.00214.20113.41017.639371.4745.253.22611.470160.43158.4190.87199.109.1622.9492.29161.4954.659.4112.152.427.12757.35810.19303461.5614993843591020.5819534110201183712513338134.657105.2952.32061.3741310.085954.41160214180010.268.052263222803199332072.92167.24943.03112399.0631.16755.0200.60994.7974915.7445541.6336249452.1626233465.2455.1436.3442.61.071151.6286928.58974.446.84515.643.34636.9979246673725.0479.18642.6227.867941.967943.121.1031.87938.41256.3817.82843.724214.2529.32713.573239.62721.418.64423.196280.90274.84178.51373.5812.0454.6953.59188.7081.3014.9429.415.2715.162617.81380.48488917.1220373902143270006320112711262197780.63860.91631.33435.9823393.6220812.11412877632324.0419.735087641025460435660.33244.43164.82575211.4417.91441.4104.76829.0955819.6847507.3819005406.5403020348.6310.9306.2294.90.902681.7696830.47952.038.94483.130.54133.1983116552527.4469.83837.2057.953739.207342.391.1046.93345.25340.2017.65631.71614.0987.59811.834182.6158.014.33220.456256.82242.00190.63388.969.1833.2812.42189.8081.0913.3127.035.3514.442015.38010.34515837.6166893830353931855420112711261165971.40354.40226.87531.5043786.6241227.82056440296724.5519.735709829499552161044.28193.59556.332893345.4325.07586.593.10983.6398857.9529521.8978981439.9323368397.1406.6395.0360.60.811601.6156338.310680.540.03183.932.03531.01166499725126.2458.44232.3487.017033.617129.860.7431.98036.27847.3317.86429.54314.1306.74911.043162.10712.716.96022.183374.76370.01227.89465.8510.8953.9583.04787.1579.8913.1835.716.9619.504021.04500.34749727.5976973875814820296520107271260098965.72547.35225.52628.6774236.5278744.72365977970724.6420.556629646998461763122.12212.25860.53065320.1722.46525.276.43OpenBenchmarking.org

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 10801 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E2004006008001000SE +/- 7.68, N = 3SE +/- 7.78, N = 3SE +/- 3.66, N = 3SE +/- 39.50, N = 12SE +/- 9.71, N = 3615.97654.71994.80829.10983.64
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 10801 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E81624324034.4530.9225.0530.2230.75
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1020304050Min: 5.03 / Avg: 17.88 / Max: 23.26Min: 4.89 / Avg: 21.18 / Max: 44.12Min: 4.73 / Avg: 39.72 / Max: 49.55Min: 4.04 / Avg: 27.44 / Max: 43.78Min: 4.94 / Avg: 31.99 / Max: 51.151. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 644 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 762 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 1403 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 976 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1141 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1122334455Min: 28 / Avg: 32.25 / Max: 36Min: 29 / Avg: 35.94 / Max: 58Min: 23 / Avg: 32.75 / Max: 39Min: 23 / Avg: 29.66 / Max: 51Min: 23 / Avg: 30.58 / Max: 50
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 10801 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E2004006008001000Min: 607.74 / Avg: 615.97 / Max: 631.31Min: 641.41 / Avg: 654.71 / Max: 668.34Min: 987.74 / Avg: 994.8 / Max: 1000Min: 647.09 / Avg: 829.1 / Max: 998.33Min: 964.33 / Avg: 983.64 / Max: 994.98

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 21601 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E2004006008001000SE +/- 8.82, N = 3SE +/- 5.46, N = 15SE +/- 9.83, N = 3SE +/- 29.64, N = 15SE +/- 23.77, N = 12641.01670.65915.74819.68857.95
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 21601 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E81624324033.7330.8227.1831.1529.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E918273645Min: 4.94 / Avg: 19.01 / Max: 24.99Min: 4.9 / Avg: 21.76 / Max: 30.7Min: 5.06 / Avg: 33.69 / Max: 43.38Min: 5.1 / Avg: 26.32 / Max: 37.68Min: 4.98 / Avg: 28.69 / Max: 43.231. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 684 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 778 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 1202 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 937 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1019 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1224364860Min: 29 / Avg: 34.03 / Max: 39Min: 30 / Avg: 38.56 / Max: 50Min: 28 / Avg: 34.4 / Max: 61Min: 27 / Avg: 32.23 / Max: 49Min: 28 / Avg: 34.87 / Max: 44
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 21601 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E160320480640800Min: 628.19 / Avg: 641.01 / Max: 657.9Min: 640.1 / Avg: 670.65 / Max: 709.17Min: 896.32 / Avg: 915.74 / Max: 928.09Min: 649.89 / Avg: 819.68 / Max: 921.4Min: 684.56 / Avg: 857.95 / Max: 924.5

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E120240360480600SE +/- 3.38, N = 4SE +/- 1.54, N = 3SE +/- 6.24, N = 3SE +/- 17.86, N = 12SE +/- 0.96, N = 3314.37314.51541.63507.38521.90MIN: 185 / MAX: 1324MIN: 186 / MAX: 696MIN: 323 / MAX: 1412MIN: 188 / MAX: 1407MIN: 256 / MAX: 1319
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4812162015.4514.3914.9616.2816.11
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E918273645Min: 5.07 / Avg: 20.35 / Max: 35.72Min: 5.3 / Avg: 21.86 / Max: 27.52Min: 5.13 / Avg: 36.22 / Max: 46.48Min: 5.22 / Avg: 31.17 / Max: 45.881. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 890 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 969 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 1026 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 940 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E1122334455Min: 32 / Avg: 38.9 / Max: 53Min: 35 / Avg: 40.98 / Max: 48Min: 28 / Avg: 33.24 / Max: 38Min: 0 / Avg: 32.88 / Max: 58
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E100200300400500Min: 309.18 / Avg: 314.37 / Max: 323.88Min: 312.76 / Avg: 314.51 / Max: 317.57Min: 529.16 / Avg: 541.63 / Max: 548.41Min: 313.98 / Avg: 507.38 / Max: 544.67Min: 520.33 / Avg: 521.9 / Max: 523.65

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E100200300400500SE +/- 0.75, N = 3SE +/- 0.68, N = 3SE +/- 4.45, N = 6SE +/- 18.18, N = 15SE +/- 2.34, N = 3248.91254.59452.16406.54439.93MIN: 46 / MAX: 814MIN: 45 / MAX: 713MIN: 69 / MAX: 1286MIN: 42 / MAX: 1282MIN: 73 / MAX: 1267
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4812162013.1911.5312.0813.7713.22
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E1020304050Min: 5.29 / Avg: 18.87 / Max: 30.53Min: 5.35 / Avg: 22.08 / Max: 29.66Min: 5.03 / Avg: 37.43 / Max: 49.42Min: 5.15 / Avg: 29.53 / Max: 42.471. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1000 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1156 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 1198 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1061 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E1224364860Min: 32 / Avg: 37.86 / Max: 55Min: 34 / Avg: 41.02 / Max: 52Min: 28 / Avg: 34.45 / Max: 40Min: 0 / Avg: 32.33 / Max: 62
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E80160240320400Min: 247.42 / Avg: 248.91 / Max: 249.83Min: 253.25 / Avg: 254.59 / Max: 255.47Min: 442.17 / Avg: 452.16 / Max: 466.82Min: 255.92 / Avg: 406.54 / Max: 457.22Min: 435.78 / Avg: 439.93 / Max: 443.86

Unvanquished

Unvanquished is a modern fork of the Tremulous first person shooter. Unvanquished is powered by the Daemon engine, a combination of the ioquake3 engine with the graphically-beautiful XreaL engine. Unvanquished supports a modern OpenGL 3 renderer and other advanced graphics features for this open-source game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E100200300400500SE +/- 5.08, N = 15SE +/- 1.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 3SE +/- 0.85, N = 3SE +/- 14.04, N = 15278.2266.2465.2348.6397.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4812162014.4012.4613.4513.3413.37
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1020304050Min: 5.17 / Avg: 19.31 / Max: 27.92Min: 5.35 / Avg: 21.36 / Max: 27.35Min: 5.24 / Avg: 34.59 / Max: 48.15Min: 5.08 / Avg: 26.14 / Max: 36.06Min: 5.42 / Avg: 29.71 / Max: 46.51. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 662 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 748 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 819 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 741 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 776 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1326395265Min: 31 / Avg: 35.54 / Max: 50Min: 32 / Avg: 37.98 / Max: 50Min: 28 / Avg: 38.69 / Max: 65Min: 27 / Avg: 31.04 / Max: 45Min: 27 / Avg: 34.58 / Max: 62
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E80160240320400Min: 254.8 / Avg: 278.25 / Max: 315.6Min: 265 / Avg: 266.2 / Max: 268.5Min: 464.8 / Avg: 465.23 / Max: 465.8Min: 346.9 / Avg: 348.6 / Max: 349.5Min: 292.1 / Avg: 397.13 / Max: 460.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E100200300400500SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.97, N = 3SE +/- 1.12, N = 3SE +/- 13.34, N = 15SE +/- 10.68, N = 12258.6263.5455.1310.9406.6
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4812162014.0912.4012.9813.3013.53
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1020304050Min: 5.19 / Avg: 18.35 / Max: 28.26Min: 5.18 / Avg: 21.24 / Max: 28Min: 5.18 / Avg: 35.07 / Max: 49.63Min: 5.12 / Avg: 23.38 / Max: 37.2Min: 4.99 / Avg: 30.04 / Max: 48.071. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 673 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 758 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 865 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 754 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 784 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1122334455Min: 31 / Avg: 35.35 / Max: 50Min: 32 / Avg: 37.16 / Max: 55Min: 28 / Avg: 38.01 / Max: 55Min: 25 / Avg: 30.01 / Max: 39Min: 0 / Avg: 33.92 / Max: 57
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E80160240320400Min: 256.7 / Avg: 258.57 / Max: 260.1Min: 261.7 / Avg: 263.53 / Max: 265Min: 453.6 / Avg: 455.1 / Max: 457.3Min: 258.5 / Avg: 310.89 / Max: 439.5Min: 349.9 / Avg: 406.58 / Max: 444.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E90180270360450SE +/- 2.45, N = 3SE +/- 0.50, N = 3SE +/- 3.30, N = 3SE +/- 11.52, N = 15SE +/- 13.10, N = 15276.3264.2436.3306.2395.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4812162014.4312.6212.8713.5913.56
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1020304050Min: 5.29 / Avg: 19.15 / Max: 27.98Min: 5.12 / Avg: 20.93 / Max: 26.07Min: 5.14 / Avg: 33.9 / Max: 47.69Min: 5.11 / Avg: 22.54 / Max: 37.37Min: 5.25 / Avg: 29.13 / Max: 42.661. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 658 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 740 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 825 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 727 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 757 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1122334455Min: 31 / Avg: 35.49 / Max: 51Min: 32 / Avg: 36.95 / Max: 55Min: 27 / Avg: 35.64 / Max: 57Min: 27 / Avg: 30.68 / Max: 41Min: 28 / Avg: 33.47 / Max: 50
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E80160240320400Min: 273.4 / Avg: 276.33 / Max: 281.2Min: 263.2 / Avg: 264.2 / Max: 264.8Min: 431.7 / Avg: 436.3 / Max: 442.7Min: 259.8 / Avg: 306.21 / Max: 437.3Min: 274.4 / Avg: 395 / Max: 438.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E100200300400500SE +/- 3.50, N = 15SE +/- 0.90, N = 3SE +/- 3.23, N = 11SE +/- 13.20, N = 15SE +/- 16.88, N = 12254.6246.8442.6294.9360.6
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E369121513.1511.6013.0012.7212.92
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1020304050Min: 5.17 / Avg: 19.37 / Max: 32.01Min: 5.14 / Avg: 21.28 / Max: 32.76Min: 5.22 / Avg: 34.06 / Max: 49.24Min: 7.21 / Avg: 23.19 / Max: 37.74Min: 5.22 / Avg: 27.91 / Max: 45.351. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 719 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 787 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 842 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 782 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 796 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1122334455Min: 32 / Avg: 36.29 / Max: 56Min: 31 / Avg: 36.57 / Max: 47Min: 27 / Avg: 35.13 / Max: 55Min: 27 / Avg: 30.91 / Max: 54Min: 28 / Avg: 32.91 / Max: 57
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnvanquished 0.52.1Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E80160240320400Min: 234 / Avg: 254.62 / Max: 281.4Min: 245.2 / Avg: 246.8 / Max: 248.3Min: 426 / Avg: 442.59 / Max: 459.1Min: 242.8 / Avg: 294.87 / Max: 415.6Min: 250.1 / Avg: 360.63 / Max: 436.5

NAMD

NAMD is a parallel molecular dynamics code designed for high-performance simulation of large biomolecular systems. NAMD was developed by the Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group in the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgdays/ns, Fewer Is BetterNAMD 2.14ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.50951.0191.52852.0382.5475SE +/- 0.00713, N = 3SE +/- 0.00370, N = 3SE +/- 0.00137, N = 3SE +/- 0.00293, N = 3SE +/- 0.00797, N = 62.264282.075911.071150.902680.81160
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNAMD 2.14CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E50100150200250Min: 5.15 / Avg: 82.19 / Max: 90.2Min: 5.16 / Avg: 90.96 / Max: 99.02Min: 5.19 / Avg: 196.77 / Max: 250.34Min: 4.99 / Avg: 181.59 / Max: 222.52Min: 2.75 / Avg: 200.1 / Max: 259.681. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 9671 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 9824 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 10691 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 11924 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 9505 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterNAMD 2.14CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 32 / Avg: 62.86 / Max: 68Min: 32 / Avg: 71.09 / Max: 77Min: 28 / Avg: 90.96 / Max: 100Min: 27 / Avg: 75.78 / Max: 88Min: 29 / Avg: 83.36 / Max: 100
OpenBenchmarking.orgdays/ns, Fewer Is BetterNAMD 2.14ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E246810Min: 2.26 / Avg: 2.26 / Max: 2.28Min: 2.07 / Avg: 2.08 / Max: 2.08Min: 1.07 / Avg: 1.07 / Max: 1.07Min: 0.9 / Avg: 0.9 / Max: 0.91Min: 0.79 / Avg: 0.81 / Max: 0.83

GROMACS

The GROMACS (GROningen MAchine for Chemical Simulations) molecular dynamics package testing with the water_GMX50 data. This test profile allows selecting between CPU and GPU-based GROMACS builds. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Day, More Is BetterGROMACS 2021.2Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.3980.7961.1941.5921.99SE +/- 0.006, N = 3SE +/- 0.010, N = 4SE +/- 0.010, N = 3SE +/- 0.019, N = 5SE +/- 0.017, N = 50.8560.8451.6281.7691.6151. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Day Per Watt, More Is BetterGROMACS 2021.2Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.00230.00460.00690.00920.01150.0100.0100.0090.0100.009
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGROMACS 2021.2CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.28 / Avg: 85.3 / Max: 95.46Min: 5.24 / Avg: 86.41 / Max: 95.25Min: 5.36 / Avg: 183.84 / Max: 207.44Min: 5.23 / Avg: 173.91 / Max: 221.31Min: 5.39 / Avg: 186.22 / Max: 213.951. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 18965 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 19032 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 21325 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 21391 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 21899 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterGROMACS 2021.2CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 37 / Avg: 65.5 / Max: 75Min: 36 / Avg: 67.48 / Max: 76Min: 36 / Avg: 84.02 / Max: 97Min: 35 / Avg: 73.05 / Max: 90Min: 36 / Avg: 83.85 / Max: 98
OpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Day, More Is BetterGROMACS 2021.2Implementation: MPI CPU - Input: water_GMX50_bare1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E246810Min: 0.85 / Avg: 0.86 / Max: 0.86Min: 0.81 / Avg: 0.84 / Max: 0.86Min: 1.61 / Avg: 1.63 / Max: 1.65Min: 1.69 / Avg: 1.77 / Max: 1.8Min: 1.55 / Avg: 1.61 / Max: 1.641. (CXX) g++ options: -O3

Xmrig

Xmrig is an open-source cross-platform CPU/GPU miner for RandomX, KawPow, CryptoNight and AstroBWT. This test profile is setup to measure the Xmlrig CPU mining performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgH/s, More Is BetterXmrig 6.12.1Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E15003000450060007500SE +/- 12.10, N = 3SE +/- 2.75, N = 3SE +/- 57.62, N = 3SE +/- 25.02, N = 3SE +/- 10.46, N = 32946.23339.06928.56830.46338.31. (CXX) g++ options: -fexceptions -fno-rtti -maes -O3 -Ofast -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -rdynamic -lssl -lcrypto -luv -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lhwloc
OpenBenchmarking.orgH/s Per Watt, More Is BetterXmrig 6.12.1Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E102030405041.2342.4537.0444.5738.72
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXmrig 6.12.1CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.21 / Avg: 71.46 / Max: 83.77Min: 5.19 / Avg: 78.66 / Max: 80.46Min: 5.1 / Avg: 186.91 / Max: 195.96Min: 5.25 / Avg: 153.27 / Max: 168.93Min: 4.98 / Avg: 163.7 / Max: 169.51. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 24963 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 24123 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 28161 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 23501 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 26738 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXmrig 6.12.1CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1632486480Min: 36 / Avg: 56.45 / Max: 61Min: 36 / Avg: 61.76 / Max: 65Min: 35 / Avg: 82.6 / Max: 86Min: 36 / Avg: 68.7 / Max: 73Min: 35 / Avg: 72.34 / Max: 76
OpenBenchmarking.orgH/s, More Is BetterXmrig 6.12.1Variant: Monero - Hash Count: 1M1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E12002400360048006000Min: 2922 / Avg: 2946.2 / Max: 2958.7Min: 3335.5 / Avg: 3338.97 / Max: 3344.4Min: 6815.1 / Avg: 6928.5 / Max: 7003Min: 6783.8 / Avg: 6830.4 / Max: 6869.5Min: 6323.8 / Avg: 6338.3 / Max: 6358.61. (CXX) g++ options: -fexceptions -fno-rtti -maes -O3 -Ofast -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -rdynamic -lssl -lcrypto -luv -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lhwloc

OpenBenchmarking.orgH/s, More Is BetterXmrig 6.12.1Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 0.52, N = 3SE +/- 1.72, N = 3SE +/- 48.25, N = 3SE +/- 1.15, N = 3SE +/- 29.35, N = 33183.93606.58974.47952.010680.51. (CXX) g++ options: -fexceptions -fno-rtti -maes -O3 -Ofast -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -rdynamic -lssl -lcrypto -luv -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lhwloc
OpenBenchmarking.orgH/s Per Watt, More Is BetterXmrig 6.12.1Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E132639526546.1047.2445.9552.6056.24
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXmrig 6.12.1CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.23 / Avg: 69.07 / Max: 78.42Min: 4.82 / Avg: 76.35 / Max: 78.1Min: 5.39 / Avg: 195.33 / Max: 214.54Min: 4.88 / Avg: 151.18 / Max: 168.27Min: 5.25 / Avg: 189.92 / Max: 200.761. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 22331 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 21734 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 22853 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 20157 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 18866 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXmrig 6.12.1CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 36 / Avg: 55.65 / Max: 61Min: 36 / Avg: 60.98 / Max: 64Min: 35 / Avg: 86.76 / Max: 94Min: 36 / Avg: 68.65 / Max: 73Min: 38 / Avg: 77.65 / Max: 82
OpenBenchmarking.orgH/s, More Is BetterXmrig 6.12.1Variant: Wownero - Hash Count: 1M1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E2K4K6K8K10KMin: 3183 / Avg: 3183.9 / Max: 3184.8Min: 3603.1 / Avg: 3606.5 / Max: 3608.6Min: 8882.5 / Avg: 8974.43 / Max: 9045.8Min: 7949.7 / Avg: 7952 / Max: 7953.2Min: 10623.7 / Avg: 10680.47 / Max: 10721.81. (CXX) g++ options: -fexceptions -fno-rtti -maes -O3 -Ofast -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ -rdynamic -lssl -lcrypto -luv -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lhwloc

Zstd Compression

This test measures the time needed to compress/decompress a sample file (a FreeBSD disk image - FreeBSD-12.2-RELEASE-amd64-memstick.img) using Zstd compression with options for different compression levels / settings. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1122334455SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.34, N = 1526.928.146.838.940.01. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 19 - Compression Speed1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1020304050Min: 26.5 / Avg: 26.87 / Max: 27.2Min: 28 / Avg: 28.1 / Max: 28.2Min: 46.4 / Avg: 46.8 / Max: 47.1Min: 38.8 / Avg: 38.9 / Max: 39Min: 37.9 / Avg: 39.98 / Max: 41.41. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E10002000300040005000SE +/- 1.71, N = 3SE +/- 463.30, N = 3SE +/- 22.67, N = 3SE +/- 1.22, N = 3SE +/- 93.54, N = 153099.23552.94515.64483.13183.91. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s Per Watt, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E2040608010072.5477.6359.8375.1453.27
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150Min: 5.18 / Avg: 42.72 / Max: 72.25Min: 5.1 / Avg: 45.77 / Max: 71.48Min: 5.26 / Avg: 75.47 / Max: 140.58Min: 5.1 / Avg: 59.66 / Max: 129.13Min: 5.07 / Avg: 59.77 / Max: 127.611. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2749 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2777 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 3396 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2963 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2961 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1530456075Min: 35 / Avg: 46.13 / Max: 58Min: 34 / Avg: 47.74 / Max: 60Min: 32 / Avg: 55.3 / Max: 76Min: 32 / Avg: 43.19 / Max: 61Min: 29 / Avg: 42.54 / Max: 65
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 19 - Decompression Speed1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E8001600240032004000Min: 3095.9 / Avg: 3099.23 / Max: 3101.6Min: 3089.3 / Avg: 3552.9 / Max: 4479.5Min: 4487.3 / Avg: 4515.57 / Max: 4560.4Min: 4480.7 / Avg: 4483.1 / Max: 4484.7Min: 3073 / Avg: 3183.89 / Max: 4493.21. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1020304050SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.35, N = 418.919.543.330.532.01. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Compression Speed1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E918273645Min: 18.5 / Avg: 18.93 / Max: 19.2Min: 19.5 / Avg: 19.53 / Max: 19.6Min: 42.8 / Avg: 43.3 / Max: 43.6Min: 30.3 / Avg: 30.5 / Max: 30.7Min: 31.6 / Avg: 31.95 / Max: 331. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E10002000300040005000SE +/- 475.71, N = 3SE +/- 4.66, N = 3SE +/- 28.02, N = 3SE +/- 479.25, N = 3SE +/- 360.20, N = 43656.33178.94636.94133.13531.01. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s Per Watt, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E2040608010089.9172.9757.8369.5860.05
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150Min: 5.07 / Avg: 40.67 / Max: 64.87Min: 5.05 / Avg: 43.57 / Max: 66.33Min: 5.18 / Avg: 80.19 / Max: 138.73Min: 5.12 / Avg: 59.4 / Max: 126.43Min: 4.82 / Avg: 58.8 / Max: 124.261. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3267 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3340 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 3769 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3386 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3293 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1530456075Min: 34 / Avg: 44.84 / Max: 60Min: 33 / Avg: 46.46 / Max: 56Min: 31 / Avg: 54.72 / Max: 77Min: 28 / Avg: 40.89 / Max: 61Min: 0 / Avg: 41.92 / Max: 62
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterZstd Compression 1.5.0Compression Level: 19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E8001600240032004000Min: 3171.9 / Avg: 3656.33 / Max: 4607.7Min: 3169.9 / Avg: 3178.9 / Max: 3185.5Min: 4606.4 / Avg: 4636.93 / Max: 4692.9Min: 3174.6 / Avg: 4133.1 / Max: 4613.3Min: 3163.2 / Avg: 3530.95 / Max: 4611.51. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz -llzma

7-Zip Compression

This is a test of 7-Zip compression/decompression with its integrated benchmark feature. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 21.06Test: Compression Rating1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 99.88, N = 3SE +/- 112.05, N = 3SE +/- 1058.12, N = 3SE +/- 88.10, N = 3SE +/- 619.45, N = 3529475471597924983111166491. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 21.06Test: Compression Rating1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20K40K60K80K100KMin: 52786 / Avg: 52947.33 / Max: 53130Min: 54539 / Avg: 54714.67 / Max: 54923Min: 95825 / Avg: 97924 / Max: 99207Min: 98173 / Avg: 98311.33 / Max: 98475Min: 115647 / Avg: 116649 / Max: 1177811. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC

OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 21.06Test: Decompression Rating1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 74.04, N = 3SE +/- 9.26, N = 3SE +/- 150.78, N = 3SE +/- 8.97, N = 3SE +/- 401.61, N = 336076411386673765525972511. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC
OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS Per Watt, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 21.06Test: Decompression Rating1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E150300450600750621.38662.67467.35616.07694.45
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Better7-Zip Compression 21.06CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.13 / Avg: 58.06 / Max: 76.85Min: 5.11 / Avg: 62.08 / Max: 79.93Min: 5.27 / Avg: 142.8 / Max: 196.04Min: 5.06 / Avg: 106.36 / Max: 163.71Min: 5.21 / Avg: 140.04 / Max: 184.111. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1819 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1780 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 3903 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2978 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 4201 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is Better7-Zip Compression 21.06CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 33 / Avg: 50.77 / Max: 62Min: 33 / Avg: 54.07 / Max: 65Min: 31 / Avg: 73.89 / Max: 89Min: 29 / Avg: 57.26 / Max: 76Min: 30 / Avg: 65.07 / Max: 78
OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 21.06Test: Decompression Rating1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20K40K60K80K100KMin: 35993 / Avg: 36076.33 / Max: 36224Min: 41121 / Avg: 41137.67 / Max: 41153Min: 66449 / Avg: 66737.33 / Max: 66958Min: 65508 / Avg: 65525.33 / Max: 65538Min: 96452 / Avg: 97250.67 / Max: 977241. (CXX) g++ options: -lpthread -ldl -O2 -fPIC

libavif avifenc

This is a test of the AOMedia libavif library testing the encoding of a JPEG image to AV1 Image Format (AVIF). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterlibavif avifenc 0.9.0Encoder Speed: 21 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1224364860SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 1.29, N = 15SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 1.40, N = 1551.4339.6625.0527.4526.251. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Betterlibavif avifenc 0.9.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.09 / Avg: 42.68 / Max: 84.66Min: 4.99 / Avg: 59.7 / Max: 93.6Min: 5.01 / Avg: 121.41 / Max: 228.43Min: 4.97 / Avg: 83.06 / Max: 165.39Min: 4.51 / Avg: 90.58 / Max: 237.251. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2362 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2607 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 3561 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2630 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2742 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is Betterlibavif avifenc 0.9.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 33 / Avg: 48.82 / Max: 62Min: 33 / Avg: 58.94 / Max: 73Min: 32 / Avg: 68.01 / Max: 100Min: 31 / Avg: 49.22 / Max: 77Min: 30 / Avg: 52.71 / Max: 89
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterlibavif avifenc 0.9.0Encoder Speed: 21 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1020304050Min: 50.98 / Avg: 51.43 / Max: 52.14Min: 36.64 / Avg: 39.66 / Max: 47.75Min: 24.88 / Avg: 25.05 / Max: 25.25Min: 27.03 / Avg: 27.45 / Max: 27.77Min: 21.48 / Avg: 26.24 / Max: 34.21. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterlibavif avifenc 0.9.0Encoder Speed: 61 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E48121620SE +/- 0.104, N = 3SE +/- 0.005, N = 4SE +/- 0.032, N = 5SE +/- 0.020, N = 5SE +/- 0.049, N = 517.81913.0709.1869.8388.4421. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Betterlibavif avifenc 0.9.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.12 / Avg: 34.83 / Max: 67.28Min: 5.04 / Avg: 49.26 / Max: 90.31Min: 5.29 / Avg: 86.9 / Max: 236.45Min: 4.97 / Avg: 61.81 / Max: 157.26Min: 5.18 / Avg: 71.92 / Max: 226.731. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 766 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 850 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 1147 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 853 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 892 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is Betterlibavif avifenc 0.9.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 33 / Avg: 43.86 / Max: 57Min: 33 / Avg: 52.62 / Max: 70Min: 31 / Avg: 57.26 / Max: 98Min: 30 / Avg: 42.86 / Max: 73Min: 30 / Avg: 45.21 / Max: 85
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterlibavif avifenc 0.9.0Encoder Speed: 61 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E510152025Min: 17.62 / Avg: 17.82 / Max: 17.96Min: 13.06 / Avg: 13.07 / Max: 13.08Min: 9.09 / Avg: 9.19 / Max: 9.27Min: 9.77 / Avg: 9.84 / Max: 9.88Min: 8.35 / Avg: 8.44 / Max: 8.591. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterlibavif avifenc 0.9.0Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1428425670SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 362.9959.6042.6237.2132.351. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Betterlibavif avifenc 0.9.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.01 / Avg: 62.01 / Max: 89.62Min: 5.06 / Avg: 78.29 / Max: 95.38Min: 5.3 / Avg: 167.27 / Max: 232.45Min: 5.12 / Avg: 120.63 / Max: 198.2Min: 5.01 / Avg: 152.93 / Max: 231.691. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 4155 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 4985 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 7806 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 4986 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 5557 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is Betterlibavif avifenc 0.9.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 32 / Avg: 55.23 / Max: 67Min: 33 / Avg: 67.17 / Max: 75Min: 31 / Avg: 81.68 / Max: 100Min: 30 / Avg: 59.17 / Max: 81Min: 28 / Avg: 68.62 / Max: 92
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterlibavif avifenc 0.9.0Encoder Speed: 6, Lossless1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1224364860Min: 62.91 / Avg: 62.98 / Max: 63.14Min: 59.41 / Avg: 59.6 / Max: 59.85Min: 42.33 / Avg: 42.62 / Max: 43.07Min: 36.97 / Avg: 37.2 / Max: 37.52Min: 31.95 / Avg: 32.35 / Max: 32.81. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fPIC -lm

ASTC Encoder

ASTC Encoder (astcenc) is for the Adaptive Scalable Texture Compression (ASTC) format commonly used with OpenGL, OpenGL ES, and Vulkan graphics APIs. This test profile does a coding test of both compression/decompression. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterASTC Encoder 3.2Preset: Thorough1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E3691215SE +/- 0.0071, N = 3SE +/- 0.0100, N = 4SE +/- 0.0634, N = 6SE +/- 0.1459, N = 15SE +/- 0.0820, N = 1513.462712.45187.86797.95377.01701. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterASTC Encoder 3.2CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.16 / Avg: 53.3 / Max: 79.22Min: 5.07 / Avg: 58.45 / Max: 85.21Min: 5.33 / Avg: 94.21 / Max: 240.5Min: 4.48 / Avg: 78.96 / Max: 195.7Min: 4.51 / Avg: 84.59 / Max: 231.11. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1172 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1184 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 1131 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 948 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 931 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterASTC Encoder 3.2CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 33 / Avg: 49.95 / Max: 60Min: 34 / Avg: 56.72 / Max: 67Min: 32 / Avg: 59.15 / Max: 97Min: 31 / Avg: 47.41 / Max: 76Min: 31 / Avg: 51.19 / Max: 85
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterASTC Encoder 3.2Preset: Thorough1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E48121620Min: 13.45 / Avg: 13.46 / Max: 13.47Min: 12.43 / Avg: 12.45 / Max: 12.47Min: 7.75 / Avg: 7.87 / Max: 8.09Min: 7.58 / Avg: 7.95 / Max: 8.88Min: 6.88 / Avg: 7.02 / Max: 8.161. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -pthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterASTC Encoder 3.2Preset: Exhaustive1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3120.76112.4841.9739.2133.621. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterASTC Encoder 3.2CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.18 / Avg: 73.65 / Max: 79.59Min: 5.05 / Avg: 79.1 / Max: 84.07Min: 5.37 / Avg: 185.38 / Max: 233.02Min: 5.05 / Avg: 166.15 / Max: 197.28Min: 5.13 / Avg: 181.51 / Max: 227.791. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 9550 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 9518 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 9145 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 7753 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 7442 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterASTC Encoder 3.2CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 34 / Avg: 57.62 / Max: 61Min: 33 / Avg: 64.1 / Max: 67Min: 31 / Avg: 86.47 / Max: 98Min: 31 / Avg: 70.73 / Max: 80Min: 31 / Avg: 77.11 / Max: 89
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterASTC Encoder 3.2Preset: Exhaustive1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 120.67 / Avg: 120.75 / Max: 120.83Min: 112.43 / Avg: 112.48 / Max: 112.5Min: 41.82 / Avg: 41.97 / Max: 42.05Min: 39.2 / Avg: 39.21 / Max: 39.22Min: 33.18 / Avg: 33.62 / Max: 33.871. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -flto -pthread

JPEG XL libjxl

The JPEG XL Image Coding System is designed to provide next-generation JPEG image capabilities with JPEG XL offering better image quality and compression over legacy JPEG. This test profile is currently focused on the multi-threaded JPEG XL image encode performance using the reference libjxl library. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMP/s, More Is BetterJPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 81 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1020304050SE +/- 0.36, N = 15SE +/- 0.05, N = 5SE +/- 0.06, N = 6SE +/- 0.30, N = 6SE +/- 0.08, N = 530.7828.1343.1242.3929.861. (CXX) g++ options: -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -pthread -fPIE -pie
OpenBenchmarking.orgMP/s Per Watt, More Is BetterJPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 81 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.37190.74381.11571.48761.85951.5611.4801.5421.6531.486
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterJPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E918273645Min: 5.09 / Avg: 19.72 / Max: 35.93Min: 5.05 / Avg: 19 / Max: 26.76Min: 5.25 / Avg: 27.97 / Max: 43.43Min: 4.87 / Avg: 25.64 / Max: 42.7Min: 5.03 / Avg: 20.09 / Max: 29.891. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 271 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 277 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 308 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 286 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 281 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterJPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1326395265Min: 31 / Avg: 39.26 / Max: 57Min: 32 / Avg: 39.64 / Max: 55Min: 29 / Avg: 35.05 / Max: 53Min: 29 / Avg: 35.6 / Max: 67Min: 31 / Avg: 34.14 / Max: 57
OpenBenchmarking.orgMP/s, More Is BetterJPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 81 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E918273645Min: 28 / Avg: 30.78 / Max: 33.25Min: 28 / Avg: 28.13 / Max: 28.3Min: 42.86 / Avg: 43.12 / Max: 43.27Min: 41.42 / Avg: 42.39 / Max: 43.08Min: 29.69 / Avg: 29.86 / Max: 30.151. (CXX) g++ options: -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -pthread -fPIE -pie

OpenBenchmarking.orgMP/s, More Is BetterJPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 81 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.24750.4950.74250.991.2375SE +/- 0.04, N = 9SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 30.930.721.101.100.741. (CXX) g++ options: -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -pthread -fPIE -pie
OpenBenchmarking.orgMP/s Per Watt, More Is BetterJPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 81 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.00740.01480.02220.02960.0370.0320.0320.0290.0310.033
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterJPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 5.1 / Avg: 29.15 / Max: 68.88Min: 5.07 / Avg: 22.32 / Max: 63.96Min: 5.07 / Avg: 38.23 / Max: 91.91Min: 4.81 / Avg: 35.39 / Max: 78.01Min: 4.81 / Avg: 22.13 / Max: 62.771. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 9402 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 8982 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 10206 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 9650 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 8718 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterJPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1530456075Min: 31 / Avg: 46.87 / Max: 60Min: 31 / Avg: 41.91 / Max: 67Min: 28 / Avg: 33.13 / Max: 76Min: 27 / Avg: 34.78 / Max: 62Min: 27 / Avg: 28.82 / Max: 58
OpenBenchmarking.orgMP/s, More Is BetterJPEG XL libjxl 0.6.1Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 81 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E246810Min: 0.73 / Avg: 0.93 / Max: 1.03Min: 0.72 / Avg: 0.72 / Max: 0.73Min: 1.09 / Avg: 1.1 / Max: 1.1Min: 1.08 / Avg: 1.1 / Max: 1.12Min: 0.74 / Avg: 0.74 / Max: 0.741. (CXX) g++ options: -funwind-tables -O3 -O2 -pthread -fPIE -pie

Hugin

Hugin is an open-source, cross-platform panorama photo stitcher software package. This test profile times how long it takes to run the assistant and panorama photo stitching on a set of images. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHuginPanorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1122334455SE +/- 1.20, N = 15SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.47, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 1548.8237.5031.8846.9331.98
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHuginCPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.17 / Avg: 36.08 / Max: 89.18Min: 5.08 / Avg: 47.27 / Max: 92.77Min: 5.16 / Avg: 74.88 / Max: 194.42Min: 4.9 / Avg: 45.88 / Max: 125.29Min: 4.79 / Avg: 66.42 / Max: 171.311. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1924 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1985 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 2746 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2371 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2422 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterHuginCPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1530456075Min: 32 / Avg: 45.23 / Max: 63Min: 30 / Avg: 54.39 / Max: 66Min: 27 / Avg: 46.79 / Max: 78Min: 28 / Avg: 38.26 / Max: 73Min: 26 / Avg: 46.73 / Max: 81
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHuginPanorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1020304050Min: 39.24 / Avg: 48.82 / Max: 51.94Min: 37.44 / Avg: 37.5 / Max: 37.58Min: 31.55 / Avg: 31.88 / Max: 32.17Min: 46 / Avg: 46.93 / Max: 47.47Min: 30.58 / Avg: 31.98 / Max: 36.4

RawTherapee

RawTherapee is a cross-platform, open-source multi-threaded RAW image processing program. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRawTherapeeTotal Benchmark Time1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1428425670SE +/- 0.60, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.69, N = 15SE +/- 0.03, N = 361.0550.9938.4145.2536.281. RawTherapee, version 5.8, command line.
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterRawTherapeeCPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150Min: 5.11 / Avg: 45.51 / Max: 67.45Min: 5.06 / Avg: 56.89 / Max: 72.63Min: 4.59 / Avg: 99.58 / Max: 162.88Min: 2.71 / Avg: 71.06 / Max: 113.21Min: 5.12 / Avg: 87.91 / Max: 137.131. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3003 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3167 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 4282 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3544 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3604 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterRawTherapeeCPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 32 / Avg: 48.06 / Max: 61Min: 32 / Avg: 57.51 / Max: 70Min: 29 / Avg: 59.23 / Max: 92Min: 28 / Avg: 46.16 / Max: 69Min: 29 / Avg: 48.79 / Max: 76
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRawTherapeeTotal Benchmark Time1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1224364860Min: 60.4 / Avg: 61.05 / Max: 62.24Min: 50.86 / Avg: 50.99 / Max: 51.12Min: 38.36 / Avg: 38.41 / Max: 38.46Min: 39.63 / Avg: 45.25 / Max: 48.2Min: 36.22 / Avg: 36.28 / Max: 36.311. RawTherapee, version 5.8, command line.

LibRaw

LibRaw is a RAW image decoder for digital camera photos. This test profile runs LibRaw's post-processing benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMpix/sec, More Is BetterLibRaw 0.20Post-Processing Benchmark1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1326395265SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 1.41, N = 1539.2051.7456.3840.2047.331. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -fopenmp -ljpeg -lz -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgMpix/sec Per Watt, More Is BetterLibRaw 0.20Post-Processing Benchmark1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.24840.49680.74520.99361.2421.1041.0440.7910.9550.928
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterLibRaw 0.20CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 5.11 / Avg: 35.5 / Max: 44.77Min: 5.08 / Avg: 49.57 / Max: 59.26Min: 4.76 / Avg: 71.24 / Max: 96.03Min: 4.86 / Avg: 42.11 / Max: 55.2Min: 4.9 / Avg: 51 / Max: 79.161. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1254 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1371 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 1852 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1460 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1540 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterLibRaw 0.20CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1428425670Min: 33 / Avg: 45.64 / Max: 56Min: 32 / Avg: 56.24 / Max: 66Min: 29 / Avg: 49.99 / Max: 74Min: 31 / Avg: 37.9 / Max: 58Min: 27 / Avg: 40.79 / Max: 74
OpenBenchmarking.orgMpix/sec, More Is BetterLibRaw 0.20Post-Processing Benchmark1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1122334455Min: 39.16 / Avg: 39.2 / Max: 39.26Min: 51.7 / Avg: 51.74 / Max: 51.78Min: 55.79 / Avg: 56.38 / Max: 56.89Min: 40.15 / Avg: 40.2 / Max: 40.28Min: 40.74 / Avg: 47.33 / Max: 54.391. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -fopenmp -ljpeg -lz -lm

Basis Universal

Basis Universal is a GPU texture codec. This test times how long it takes to convert sRGB PNGs into Basis Univeral assets with various settings. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBasis Universal 1.13Settings: ETC1S1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E714212835SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.49, N = 15SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 15SE +/- 0.49, N = 1429.1422.4017.8317.6617.861. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterBasis Universal 1.13CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150Min: 5.07 / Avg: 27.36 / Max: 72.51Min: 4.94 / Avg: 36.16 / Max: 76.9Min: 5.1 / Avg: 51.66 / Max: 148.44Min: 4.59 / Avg: 43.87 / Max: 151.67Min: 4.54 / Avg: 43.79 / Max: 158.581. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 912 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 960 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 1137 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 953 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 963 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterBasis Universal 1.13CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1530456075Min: 32 / Avg: 41.16 / Max: 57Min: 32 / Avg: 49.11 / Max: 65Min: 28 / Avg: 41.03 / Max: 80Min: 0 / Avg: 37.4 / Max: 66Min: 28 / Avg: 38.58 / Max: 71
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBasis Universal 1.13Settings: ETC1S1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E612182430Min: 29.12 / Avg: 29.14 / Max: 29.14Min: 21.45 / Avg: 22.4 / Max: 27.04Min: 17.78 / Avg: 17.83 / Max: 17.88Min: 16.96 / Avg: 17.66 / Max: 22.67Min: 16.72 / Avg: 17.86 / Max: 24.041. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBasis Universal 1.13Settings: UASTC Level 31 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1530456075SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 365.3861.5543.7231.7229.541. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterBasis Universal 1.13CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.13 / Avg: 68.74 / Max: 80.62Min: 5.05 / Avg: 76.17 / Max: 86.18Min: 5.09 / Avg: 166.95 / Max: 209.48Min: 4.81 / Avg: 142.5 / Max: 186.82Min: 5.07 / Avg: 157.94 / Max: 211.711. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 4789 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 5002 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 7958 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 5130 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 5317 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterBasis Universal 1.13CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 31 / Avg: 57.32 / Max: 65Min: 30 / Avg: 66.75 / Max: 72Min: 28 / Avg: 83.97 / Max: 97Min: 28 / Avg: 66.25 / Max: 80Min: 27 / Avg: 70.64 / Max: 89
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBasis Universal 1.13Settings: UASTC Level 31 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1326395265Min: 65.37 / Avg: 65.38 / Max: 65.39Min: 61.5 / Avg: 61.55 / Max: 61.58Min: 43.55 / Avg: 43.72 / Max: 43.84Min: 31.71 / Avg: 31.72 / Max: 31.73Min: 29.46 / Avg: 29.54 / Max: 29.691. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++11 -fvisibility=hidden -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lm -lpthread

KTX-Software toktx

This is a benchmark of The Khronos Group's KTX-Software library and tools. KTX-Software provides "toktx" for converting/creating in the KTX container format for image textures. This benchmark times how long it takes to convert to KTX 2.0 format with various settings using a reference PNG sample input. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0Settings: Zstd Compression 91 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT0.76881.53762.30643.07523.844SE +/- 0.003, N = 93.4172.0022.000
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT714212835Min: 5.07 / Avg: 11.39 / Max: 19.67Min: 5.05 / Avg: 13.97 / Max: 33.5Min: 5.17 / Avg: 14.25 / Max: 33.131. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 85 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT1122334455Min: 31 / Avg: 34.88 / Max: 39Min: 33 / Avg: 38.2 / Max: 55Min: 30 / Avg: 33.33 / Max: 44
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0Settings: Zstd Compression 91 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT246810Min: 3.41 / Avg: 3.42 / Max: 3.44

Settings: Zstd Compression 9

8 P + 8 E: Test failed to run.

8 P + HT + 8 E: Test failed to run.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0Settings: Zstd Compression 191 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E510152025SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 4SE +/- 0.01, N = 4SE +/- 0.00, N = 4SE +/- 0.01, N = 420.8314.2014.2514.1014.13
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E714212835Min: 5.08 / Avg: 16.19 / Max: 18.57Min: 5.09 / Avg: 24.98 / Max: 33.2Min: 5.06 / Avg: 24.87 / Max: 32.53Min: 4.95 / Avg: 24.82 / Max: 32.4Min: 4.58 / Avg: 25.25 / Max: 33.511. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 399 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 456 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 454 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 447 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 454 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1020304050Min: 30 / Avg: 34.58 / Max: 37Min: 31 / Avg: 43.9 / Max: 52Min: 27 / Avg: 36.77 / Max: 41Min: 27 / Avg: 32.53 / Max: 35Min: 27 / Avg: 30.36 / Max: 32
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0Settings: Zstd Compression 191 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E510152025Min: 20.77 / Avg: 20.83 / Max: 20.89Min: 14.18 / Avg: 14.2 / Max: 14.23Min: 14.23 / Avg: 14.25 / Max: 14.27Min: 14.1 / Avg: 14.1 / Max: 14.1Min: 14.11 / Avg: 14.13 / Max: 14.15

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0Settings: UASTC 31 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E48121620SE +/- 0.004, N = 4SE +/- 0.003, N = 4SE +/- 0.016, N = 5SE +/- 0.003, N = 6SE +/- 0.004, N = 614.91513.4109.3277.5986.749
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.09 / Avg: 51.78 / Max: 76.46Min: 5.07 / Avg: 57.88 / Max: 81.39Min: 5.12 / Avg: 116.13 / Max: 209.48Min: 4.71 / Avg: 91.22 / Max: 174.67Min: 5.1 / Avg: 97.49 / Max: 203.051. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 984 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1013 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 1556 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1064 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1056 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 29 / Avg: 47.55 / Max: 57Min: 31 / Avg: 56.49 / Max: 67Min: 26 / Avg: 64.45 / Max: 94Min: 27 / Avg: 51.26 / Max: 73Min: 27 / Avg: 51.4 / Max: 80
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0Settings: UASTC 31 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E48121620Min: 14.91 / Avg: 14.92 / Max: 14.92Min: 13.4 / Avg: 13.41 / Max: 13.42Min: 9.28 / Avg: 9.33 / Max: 9.36Min: 7.59 / Avg: 7.6 / Max: 7.61Min: 6.74 / Avg: 6.75 / Max: 6.76

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0Settings: UASTC 3 + Zstd Compression 191 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E510152025SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 4SE +/- 0.00, N = 4SE +/- 0.03, N = 520.9517.6413.5711.8311.04
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.19 / Avg: 43.6 / Max: 76.85Min: 4.99 / Avg: 52.36 / Max: 81.49Min: 5.01 / Avg: 95.72 / Max: 209.64Min: 4.97 / Avg: 74.51 / Max: 173.52Min: 5.03 / Avg: 78.6 / Max: 202.731. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1090 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1134 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 1699 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1192 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1195 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 32 / Avg: 46.01 / Max: 58Min: 33 / Avg: 54.29 / Max: 67Min: 31 / Avg: 59.85 / Max: 94Min: 30 / Avg: 46.45 / Max: 73Min: 29 / Avg: 49.42 / Max: 81
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0Settings: UASTC 3 + Zstd Compression 191 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E510152025Min: 20.93 / Avg: 20.95 / Max: 20.97Min: 17.63 / Avg: 17.64 / Max: 17.64Min: 13.54 / Avg: 13.57 / Max: 13.65Min: 11.83 / Avg: 11.83 / Max: 11.84Min: 11.01 / Avg: 11.04 / Max: 11.15

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0Settings: UASTC 4 + Zstd Compression 191 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E80160240320400SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.27, N = 3389.84371.47239.63182.62162.11
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.14 / Avg: 74.58 / Max: 78.36Min: 5.06 / Avg: 80.57 / Max: 83.18Min: 5.16 / Avg: 188.54 / Max: 207.94Min: 4.83 / Avg: 168.93 / Max: 179.58Min: 5.13 / Avg: 185.94 / Max: 209.291. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 29360 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 30240 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 45878 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 31533 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 30804 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 32 / Avg: 59.71 / Max: 62Min: 32 / Avg: 68.79 / Max: 72Min: 31 / Avg: 92.76 / Max: 98Min: 28 / Avg: 74.72 / Max: 80Min: 30 / Avg: 83.04 / Max: 90
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterKTX-Software toktx 4.0Settings: UASTC 4 + Zstd Compression 191 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E70140210280350Min: 389.76 / Avg: 389.84 / Max: 389.92Min: 371.43 / Avg: 371.47 / Max: 371.53Min: 239.28 / Avg: 239.63 / Max: 239.84Min: 182.6 / Avg: 182.62 / Max: 182.63Min: 161.56 / Avg: 162.11 / Max: 162.43

CLOMP

CLOMP is the C version of the Livermore OpenMP benchmark developed to measure OpenMP overheads and other performance impacts due to threading in order to influence future system designs. This particular test profile configuration is currently set to look at the OpenMP static schedule speed-up across all available CPU cores using the recommended test configuration. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSpeedup, More Is BetterCLOMP 1.2Static OMP Speedup1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E510152025SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 8SE +/- 0.07, N = 15SE +/- 0.17, N = 34.65.221.48.012.71. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgSpeedup Per Watt, More Is BetterCLOMP 1.2Static OMP Speedup1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.10550.2110.31650.4220.52750.1310.1370.4690.1830.300
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCLOMP 1.2CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150Min: 5.14 / Avg: 35.18 / Max: 62.47Min: 5.13 / Avg: 38.04 / Max: 71.9Min: 5.21 / Avg: 45.58 / Max: 190.13Min: 2.54 / Avg: 43.63 / Max: 141.28Min: 5.15 / Avg: 42.27 / Max: 170.381. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2017 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2105 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 1709 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1928 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1719 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterCLOMP 1.2CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1428425670Min: 34 / Avg: 42.87 / Max: 50Min: 34 / Avg: 44.45 / Max: 54Min: 31 / Avg: 38.62 / Max: 74Min: 30 / Avg: 36.75 / Max: 57Min: 31 / Avg: 39.75 / Max: 62
OpenBenchmarking.orgSpeedup, More Is BetterCLOMP 1.2Static OMP Speedup1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E510152025Min: 4.6 / Avg: 4.63 / Max: 4.7Min: 5.1 / Avg: 5.2 / Max: 5.3Min: 20.6 / Avg: 21.43 / Max: 22Min: 7.7 / Avg: 7.95 / Max: 8.3Min: 12.4 / Avg: 12.73 / Max: 12.91. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O3 -lm

Primesieve

Primesieve generates prime numbers using a highly optimized sieve of Eratosthenes implementation. Primesieve benchmarks the CPU's L1/L2 cache performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPrimesieve 7.71e12 Prime Number Generation1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1224364860SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 4SE +/- 0.04, N = 354.0553.2318.6414.3316.961. (CXX) g++ options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterPrimesieve 7.7CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.16 / Avg: 62.59 / Max: 68.65Min: 5.09 / Avg: 68.91 / Max: 76.1Min: 5.19 / Avg: 170.73 / Max: 226.13Min: 4.35 / Avg: 142.52 / Max: 192.15Min: 5.16 / Avg: 158.03 / Max: 211.421. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3651 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3951 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 3870 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2637 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3319 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterPrimesieve 7.7CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 33 / Avg: 58.8 / Max: 62Min: 34 / Avg: 67.84 / Max: 72Min: 28 / Avg: 80.25 / Max: 97Min: 28 / Avg: 65.19 / Max: 80Min: 28 / Avg: 71.48 / Max: 88
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPrimesieve 7.71e12 Prime Number Generation1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1122334455Min: 53.98 / Avg: 54.05 / Max: 54.14Min: 53.19 / Avg: 53.23 / Max: 53.26Min: 18.47 / Avg: 18.64 / Max: 18.74Min: 14.28 / Avg: 14.33 / Max: 14.41Min: 16.89 / Avg: 16.96 / Max: 17.011. (CXX) g++ options: -O3

SVT-AV1

This is a benchmark of the SVT-AV1 open-source video encoder/decoder. SVT-AV1 was originally developed by Intel as part of their Open Visual Cloud / Scalable Video Technology (SVT). Development of SVT-AV1 has since moved to the Alliance for Open Media as part of upstream AV1 development. SVT-AV1 is a CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the AV1 video format with a sample YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.8.7Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E612182430SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 310.5011.4723.2020.4622.181. (CXX) g++ options: -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq -pie
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.8.7Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.04610.09220.13830.18440.23050.1820.1750.1610.2050.205
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.8.7CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.13 / Avg: 57.78 / Max: 87.39Min: 5.12 / Avg: 65.65 / Max: 96.32Min: 5.22 / Avg: 143.93 / Max: 200.38Min: 4.96 / Avg: 99.83 / Max: 167.62Min: 5.34 / Avg: 108.24 / Max: 181.541. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3582 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3742 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 4462 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3427 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3464 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.8.7CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 33 / Avg: 54.48 / Max: 62Min: 33 / Avg: 59.52 / Max: 72Min: 33 / Avg: 72.31 / Max: 97Min: 32 / Avg: 51.5 / Max: 76Min: 33 / Avg: 57.15 / Max: 88
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.8.7Encoder Mode: Preset 8 - Input: Bosphorus 4K1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E510152025Min: 10.34 / Avg: 10.5 / Max: 10.59Min: 11.45 / Avg: 11.47 / Max: 11.5Min: 22.92 / Avg: 23.2 / Max: 23.49Min: 19.98 / Avg: 20.46 / Max: 20.71Min: 21.97 / Avg: 22.18 / Max: 22.331. (CXX) g++ options: -mno-avx -mavx2 -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512dq -pie

SVT-VP9

This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-VP9 CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the VP9 video format with a sample YUV input video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.3Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E80160240320400SE +/- 0.43, N = 8SE +/- 0.53, N = 8SE +/- 0.79, N = 10SE +/- 1.04, N = 10SE +/- 0.40, N = 11154.27160.43280.90256.82374.761. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.3Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E2468103.8663.8144.1835.2256.514
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.3CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.17 / Avg: 39.91 / Max: 80.49Min: 5.12 / Avg: 42.06 / Max: 86.97Min: 5.16 / Avg: 67.16 / Max: 204.8Min: 4.99 / Avg: 49.15 / Max: 138.88Min: 4.8 / Avg: 57.53 / Max: 200.881. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 324 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 337 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 423 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 324 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 340 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.3CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 33 / Avg: 44.62 / Max: 60Min: 34 / Avg: 47.53 / Max: 68Min: 31 / Avg: 48.14 / Max: 89Min: 30 / Avg: 40.2 / Max: 63Min: 31 / Avg: 42.05 / Max: 77
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.3Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E70140210280350Min: 151.58 / Avg: 154.27 / Max: 155.27Min: 157.06 / Avg: 160.43 / Max: 161.85Min: 274.85 / Avg: 280.9 / Max: 284.18Min: 250.15 / Avg: 256.82 / Max: 260.87Min: 372.45 / Avg: 374.76 / Max: 376.421. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.3Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E80160240320400SE +/- 0.16, N = 8SE +/- 0.18, N = 8SE +/- 0.34, N = 10SE +/- 1.26, N = 10SE +/- 0.55, N = 11152.50158.41274.84242.00370.011. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.3Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E2468103.8743.8094.3065.4046.687
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.3CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.1 / Avg: 39.36 / Max: 78.73Min: 4.87 / Avg: 41.59 / Max: 84.69Min: 5.12 / Avg: 63.83 / Max: 194.49Min: 4.67 / Avg: 44.79 / Max: 126.34Min: 5.03 / Avg: 55.33 / Max: 194.691. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 320 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 333 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 415 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 305 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 327 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.3CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1632486480Min: 32 / Avg: 42.91 / Max: 57Min: 32 / Avg: 44.48 / Max: 64Min: 29 / Avg: 44.58 / Max: 85Min: 27 / Avg: 34.93 / Max: 54Min: 28 / Avg: 39.03 / Max: 74
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 0.3Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E70140210280350Min: 151.81 / Avg: 152.5 / Max: 153.09Min: 157.97 / Avg: 158.41 / Max: 159.16Min: 273.11 / Avg: 274.84 / Max: 276.67Min: 235.79 / Avg: 242 / Max: 246.01Min: 368.03 / Avg: 370.01 / Max: 372.711. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -fcommon -fPIE -fPIC -fvisibility=hidden -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm

SVT-HEVC

This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-HEVC CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the HEVC / H.265 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.5.0Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E50100150200250SE +/- 0.13, N = 6SE +/- 0.12, N = 6SE +/- 0.67, N = 9SE +/- 0.32, N = 9SE +/- 0.19, N = 984.8790.87178.51190.63227.891. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O3 -O2 -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.5.0Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.59471.18941.78412.37882.97351.6491.5971.6762.4322.643
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.5.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.2 / Avg: 51.45 / Max: 82.83Min: 5.06 / Avg: 56.89 / Max: 92.06Min: 5.12 / Avg: 106.54 / Max: 245.47Min: 5.02 / Avg: 78.4 / Max: 184.82Min: 4.83 / Avg: 86.21 / Max: 226.091. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 592 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 626 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 817 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 592 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 603 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.5.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 31 / Avg: 47.33 / Max: 59Min: 32 / Avg: 51.05 / Max: 67Min: 28 / Avg: 57.16 / Max: 97Min: 27 / Avg: 45.16 / Max: 73Min: 27 / Avg: 49.22 / Max: 85
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.5.0Tuning: 7 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 84.31 / Avg: 84.87 / Max: 85.2Min: 90.28 / Avg: 90.87 / Max: 91.09Min: 174.47 / Avg: 178.51 / Max: 180.51Min: 188.38 / Avg: 190.63 / Max: 191.51Min: 227.01 / Avg: 227.89 / Max: 229.011. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O3 -O2 -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.5.0Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E100200300400500SE +/- 0.17, N = 9SE +/- 0.22, N = 9SE +/- 0.37, N = 11SE +/- 0.77, N = 11SE +/- 0.60, N = 12183.91199.10373.58388.96465.851. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O3 -O2 -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.5.0Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E36912155.0595.0415.7378.1239.030
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.5.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.11 / Avg: 36.35 / Max: 79.94Min: 5.1 / Avg: 39.71 / Max: 89.45Min: 4.93 / Avg: 65.12 / Max: 230.24Min: 4.81 / Avg: 47.89 / Max: 174.38Min: 4.9 / Avg: 51.59 / Max: 208.421. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 279 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 296 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 391 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 287 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 292 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.5.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 32 / Avg: 41.83 / Max: 56Min: 32 / Avg: 44.85 / Max: 63Min: 29 / Avg: 45.85 / Max: 92Min: 24 / Avg: 37.88 / Max: 67Min: 28 / Avg: 38.78 / Max: 74
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 1.5.0Tuning: 10 - Input: Bosphorus 1080p1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E80160240320400Min: 182.87 / Avg: 183.91 / Max: 184.5Min: 197.89 / Avg: 199.1 / Max: 199.93Min: 371.29 / Avg: 373.58 / Max: 375.23Min: 385.36 / Avg: 388.96 / Max: 393.7Min: 462.96 / Avg: 465.85 / Max: 470.591. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O3 -O2 -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt

rav1e

Xiph rav1e is a Rust-written AV1 video encoder that claims to be the fastest and safest AV1 encoder. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterrav1e 0.5Speed: 101 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E3691215SE +/- 0.054, N = 4SE +/- 0.071, N = 5SE +/- 0.121, N = 6SE +/- 0.104, N = 15SE +/- 0.146, N = 158.3119.16212.0459.18310.895
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Betterrav1e 0.5Speed: 101 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.05740.11480.17220.22960.2870.2550.2460.1830.2110.200
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Betterrav1e 0.5CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 4.93 / Avg: 32.58 / Max: 45.35Min: 5.06 / Avg: 37.22 / Max: 54.79Min: 5.08 / Avg: 65.82 / Max: 106.48Min: 4.6 / Avg: 43.48 / Max: 69.22Min: 4.75 / Avg: 54.41 / Max: 92.131. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 521 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 558 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 812 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 649 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 718 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is Betterrav1e 0.5CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1530456075Min: 32 / Avg: 42.41 / Max: 55Min: 32 / Avg: 48.64 / Max: 66Min: 28 / Avg: 43.64 / Max: 81Min: 27 / Avg: 39.17 / Max: 65Min: 27 / Avg: 39.37 / Max: 66
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterrav1e 0.5Speed: 101 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E48121620Min: 8.15 / Avg: 8.31 / Max: 8.39Min: 8.97 / Avg: 9.16 / Max: 9.38Min: 11.67 / Avg: 12.04 / Max: 12.53Min: 8.72 / Avg: 9.18 / Max: 10.17Min: 10.17 / Avg: 10.89 / Max: 12.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterrav1e 0.5Speed: 61 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1.05642.11283.16924.22565.282SE +/- 0.010, N = 3SE +/- 0.018, N = 3SE +/- 0.031, N = 4SE +/- 0.040, N = 15SE +/- 0.062, N = 152.9112.9494.6953.2813.958
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Betterrav1e 0.5Speed: 61 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.01730.03460.05190.06920.08650.0770.0680.0560.0680.063
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Betterrav1e 0.5CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 5.28 / Avg: 37.8 / Max: 50.97Min: 5.08 / Avg: 43.58 / Max: 60.54Min: 5.11 / Avg: 83.11 / Max: 121.02Min: 4.58 / Avg: 48.56 / Max: 81.26Min: 4.73 / Avg: 62.84 / Max: 115.371. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 945 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1061 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 1413 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1088 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1211 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is Betterrav1e 0.5CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1530456075Min: 32 / Avg: 45.64 / Max: 57Min: 32 / Avg: 50.36 / Max: 67Min: 28 / Avg: 50.65 / Max: 80Min: 28 / Avg: 38 / Max: 67Min: 29 / Avg: 45.47 / Max: 73
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterrav1e 0.5Speed: 61 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E246810Min: 2.89 / Avg: 2.91 / Max: 2.93Min: 2.92 / Avg: 2.95 / Max: 2.98Min: 4.63 / Avg: 4.69 / Max: 4.78Min: 3.04 / Avg: 3.28 / Max: 3.6Min: 3.57 / Avg: 3.96 / Max: 4.49

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterrav1e 0.5Speed: 51 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.8081.6162.4243.2324.04SE +/- 0.006, N = 3SE +/- 0.027, N = 4SE +/- 0.017, N = 3SE +/- 0.007, N = 3SE +/- 0.051, N = 152.2162.2913.5912.4213.047
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Betterrav1e 0.5Speed: 51 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.01260.02520.03780.05040.0630.0560.0490.0380.0480.043
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Betterrav1e 0.5CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.17 / Avg: 39.62 / Max: 79.66Min: 5.1 / Avg: 47.12 / Max: 78.43Min: 5.17 / Avg: 94.38 / Max: 191.83Min: 5.01 / Avg: 50.85 / Max: 114.22Min: 4.65 / Avg: 70.82 / Max: 188.721. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1242 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1425 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 1951 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1441 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1690 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is Betterrav1e 0.5CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1632486480Min: 33 / Avg: 46.88 / Max: 61Min: 33 / Avg: 54.17 / Max: 70Min: 31 / Avg: 55.66 / Max: 84Min: 28 / Avg: 34.65 / Max: 67Min: 0 / Avg: 47.96 / Max: 82
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterrav1e 0.5Speed: 51 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E246810Min: 2.21 / Avg: 2.22 / Max: 2.23Min: 2.22 / Avg: 2.29 / Max: 2.33Min: 3.56 / Avg: 3.59 / Max: 3.62Min: 2.41 / Avg: 2.42 / Max: 2.43Min: 2.73 / Avg: 3.05 / Max: 3.38

AOM AV1

This is a test of the AOMedia AV1 encoder (libaom) developed by AOMedia and Google. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterAOM AV1 3.2Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100SE +/- 0.62, N = 4SE +/- 0.51, N = 15SE +/- 0.95, N = 15SE +/- 1.77, N = 15SE +/- 1.20, N = 1553.9561.4988.7089.8087.151. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterAOM AV1 3.2Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.32720.65440.98161.30881.6361.3641.2721.1091.4541.361
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterAOM AV1 3.2CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 5.17 / Avg: 39.56 / Max: 57.42Min: 4.93 / Avg: 48.33 / Max: 68.48Min: 5.14 / Avg: 79.99 / Max: 131.9Min: 4.72 / Avg: 61.75 / Max: 104.46Min: 4.98 / Avg: 64.01 / Max: 105.921. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 663 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 715 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 944 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 729 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 760 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterAOM AV1 3.2CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1530456075Min: 32 / Avg: 42.7 / Max: 51Min: 33 / Avg: 50.26 / Max: 65Min: 30 / Avg: 51.35 / Max: 76Min: 0 / Avg: 42.84 / Max: 61Min: 0 / Avg: 42.26 / Max: 62
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterAOM AV1 3.2Encoder Mode: Speed 10 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 52.09 / Avg: 53.95 / Max: 54.7Min: 54.37 / Avg: 61.49 / Max: 62.34Min: 75.4 / Avg: 88.7 / Max: 89.96Min: 69.56 / Avg: 89.8 / Max: 94.95Min: 76.55 / Avg: 87.15 / Max: 91.181. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterAOM AV1 3.2Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100SE +/- 0.34, N = 4SE +/- 0.38, N = 15SE +/- 0.07, N = 6SE +/- 1.06, N = 15SE +/- 0.92, N = 1549.4454.6581.3081.0979.891. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterAOM AV1 3.2Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.26840.53680.80521.07361.3421.1761.0570.9141.1931.144
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterAOM AV1 3.2CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150Min: 5.16 / Avg: 42.05 / Max: 66.09Min: 5.06 / Avg: 51.69 / Max: 71.59Min: 4.71 / Avg: 88.93 / Max: 137.21Min: 4.44 / Avg: 67.95 / Max: 110Min: 4.91 / Avg: 69.86 / Max: 111.311. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 778 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 817 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 1082 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 829 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 862 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterAOM AV1 3.2CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1530456075Min: 33 / Avg: 44.3 / Max: 55Min: 34 / Avg: 50.93 / Max: 65Min: 31 / Avg: 57.07 / Max: 80Min: 31 / Avg: 45.46 / Max: 63Min: 31 / Avg: 46.13 / Max: 65
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterAOM AV1 3.2Encoder Mode: Speed 9 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1632486480Min: 49.06 / Avg: 49.44 / Max: 50.46Min: 51.8 / Avg: 54.65 / Max: 55.83Min: 81 / Avg: 81.3 / Max: 81.45Min: 72.91 / Avg: 81.09 / Max: 84.4Min: 70.42 / Avg: 79.89 / Max: 82.331. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterAOM AV1 3.2Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E48121620SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 15SE +/- 0.11, N = 15SE +/- 0.32, N = 12SE +/- 0.26, N = 158.479.4114.9413.3113.181. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterAOM AV1 3.2Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.04070.08140.12210.16280.20350.1690.1630.1290.1810.170
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterAOM AV1 3.2CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150Min: 5.15 / Avg: 50.18 / Max: 57.75Min: 4.96 / Avg: 57.59 / Max: 68.73Min: 5 / Avg: 115.59 / Max: 141.87Min: 4.91 / Avg: 73.73 / Max: 99.43Min: 5.06 / Avg: 77.73 / Max: 109.971. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3797 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3955 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 5186 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3699 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3933 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterAOM AV1 3.2CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 33 / Avg: 51.39 / Max: 60Min: 34 / Avg: 56.31 / Max: 70Min: 29 / Avg: 65.27 / Max: 89Min: 31 / Avg: 47.62 / Max: 70Min: 0 / Avg: 49.77 / Max: 73
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterAOM AV1 3.2Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime - Input: Bosphorus 4K1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E48121620Min: 8.42 / Avg: 8.47 / Max: 8.54Min: 8.87 / Avg: 9.41 / Max: 9.81Min: 14.3 / Avg: 14.94 / Max: 15.63Min: 11.56 / Avg: 13.31 / Max: 14.52Min: 11.43 / Avg: 13.18 / Max: 14.711. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -std=c++11 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lm

OSPray

Intel OSPray is a portable ray-tracing engine for high-performance, high-fidenlity scientific visualizations. OSPray builds off Intel's Embree and Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC) components as part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOSPray 1.8.5Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E816243240SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 5SE +/- 0.00, N = 5SE +/- 0.00, N = 610.9912.1529.4127.0335.71MIN: 10.87 / MAX: 11.11MIN: 11.63 / MAX: 12.35MIN: 24.39 / MAX: 30.3MIN: 26.32 / MAX: 27.78MIN: 33.33
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS Per Watt, More Is BetterOSPray 1.8.5Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.06260.12520.18780.25040.3130.1750.1760.2180.2210.278
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterOSPray 1.8.5CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.18 / Avg: 62.64 / Max: 80.17Min: 5.09 / Avg: 69.2 / Max: 86.94Min: 5.23 / Avg: 135 / Max: 240.85Min: 5.03 / Avg: 122.27 / Max: 200.22Min: 5.21 / Avg: 128.46 / Max: 233.321. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1587 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1569 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 1728 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1614 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1456 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterOSPray 1.8.5CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 34 / Avg: 52.79 / Max: 60Min: 34 / Avg: 58.16 / Max: 66Min: 31 / Avg: 68.14 / Max: 96Min: 31 / Avg: 58.47 / Max: 78Min: 31 / Avg: 60.49 / Max: 86
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOSPray 1.8.5Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E816243240Min: 10.99 / Avg: 10.99 / Max: 10.99Min: 12.05 / Avg: 12.15 / Max: 12.2Min: 29.41 / Avg: 29.41 / Max: 29.41Min: 27.03 / Avg: 27.03 / Max: 27.03Min: 35.71 / Avg: 35.71 / Max: 35.71

OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOSPray 1.8.5Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E246810SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 32.202.425.275.356.96MIN: 2.16 / MAX: 2.23MIN: 2.38 / MAX: 2.46MIN: 4.13 / MAX: 5.41MIN: 5.18 / MAX: 5.49MIN: 6.58 / MAX: 7.19
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS Per Watt, More Is BetterOSPray 1.8.5Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.00830.01660.02490.03320.04150.0290.0300.0270.0300.037
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterOSPray 1.8.5CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.18 / Avg: 75.98 / Max: 81.03Min: 5.1 / Avg: 81.69 / Max: 86.85Min: 5.35 / Avg: 198.49 / Max: 239.11Min: 5.02 / Avg: 176.58 / Max: 201.95Min: 5.03 / Avg: 189.86 / Max: 232.221. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 7775 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 7570 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 9064 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 7946 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 6835 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterOSPray 1.8.5CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 35 / Avg: 58.47 / Max: 63Min: 34 / Avg: 63.78 / Max: 67Min: 33 / Avg: 84.94 / Max: 97Min: 32 / Avg: 72.13 / Max: 81Min: 32 / Avg: 76.75 / Max: 88
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterOSPray 1.8.5Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E3691215Min: 2.2 / Avg: 2.2 / Max: 2.2Min: 2.42 / Avg: 2.42 / Max: 2.42Min: 5.26 / Avg: 5.27 / Max: 5.29Min: 5.35 / Avg: 5.35 / Max: 5.35Min: 6.94 / Avg: 6.96 / Max: 6.99

Embree

Intel Embree is a collection of high-performance ray-tracing kernels for execution on CPUs and supporting instruction sets such as SSE, AVX, AVX2, and AVX-512. Embree also supports making use of the Intel SPMD Program Compiler (ISPC). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.13Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E510152025SE +/- 0.0220, N = 3SE +/- 0.0194, N = 3SE +/- 0.0525, N = 3SE +/- 0.0276, N = 3SE +/- 0.0384, N = 36.47437.127515.162614.442019.5040MIN: 6.42 / MAX: 6.6MIN: 7.05 / MAX: 7.25MIN: 14.96 / MAX: 15.65MIN: 14.29 / MAX: 14.75MIN: 18.93 / MAX: 20.03
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterEmbree 3.13Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.02340.04680.07020.09360.1170.0850.0870.0790.0850.104
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterEmbree 3.13CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.12 / Avg: 76.46 / Max: 80.65Min: 5.09 / Avg: 81.49 / Max: 86.22Min: 5.43 / Avg: 190.91 / Max: 229.6Min: 5.07 / Avg: 169.86 / Max: 189.11Min: 5.34 / Avg: 188.23 / Max: 227.711. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 7671 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 7497 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 8782 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 8097 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 6902 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterEmbree 3.13CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 36 / Avg: 58.2 / Max: 62Min: 35 / Avg: 64.83 / Max: 70Min: 36 / Avg: 86.46 / Max: 100Min: 34 / Avg: 72.94 / Max: 80Min: 35 / Avg: 80.14 / Max: 90
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.13Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E510152025Min: 6.45 / Avg: 6.47 / Max: 6.52Min: 7.09 / Avg: 7.13 / Max: 7.15Min: 15.08 / Avg: 15.16 / Max: 15.26Min: 14.4 / Avg: 14.44 / Max: 14.49Min: 19.43 / Avg: 19.5 / Max: 19.56

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.13Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E510152025SE +/- 0.0028, N = 3SE +/- 0.0190, N = 3SE +/- 0.0421, N = 3SE +/- 0.0225, N = 3SE +/- 0.0434, N = 36.56687.358117.813815.380121.0450MIN: 6.53 / MAX: 6.65MIN: 7.29 / MAX: 7.49MIN: 17.57 / MAX: 18.42MIN: 15.22 / MAX: 15.7MIN: 20.46 / MAX: 21.75
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterEmbree 3.13Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.0250.050.0750.10.1250.0850.0890.0910.0890.111
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterEmbree 3.13CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.12 / Avg: 77.04 / Max: 80.91Min: 5.14 / Avg: 82.57 / Max: 87.15Min: 5.37 / Avg: 195.17 / Max: 236.02Min: 5.3 / Avg: 173.58 / Max: 194.2Min: 4.61 / Avg: 189.09 / Max: 228.141. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 7653 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 7349 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 7676 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 7811 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 6429 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterEmbree 3.13CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 36 / Avg: 58.37 / Max: 62Min: 35 / Avg: 63.96 / Max: 68Min: 35 / Avg: 87.17 / Max: 100Min: 35 / Avg: 73.3 / Max: 80Min: 35 / Avg: 79.63 / Max: 89
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterEmbree 3.13Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E510152025Min: 6.56 / Avg: 6.57 / Max: 6.57Min: 7.33 / Avg: 7.36 / Max: 7.39Min: 17.73 / Avg: 17.81 / Max: 17.87Min: 15.36 / Avg: 15.38 / Max: 15.43Min: 20.99 / Avg: 21.05 / Max: 21.13

Intel Open Image Denoise

Open Image Denoise is a denoising library for ray-tracing and part of the oneAPI rendering toolkit. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages / Sec, More Is BetterIntel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x21601 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.1080.2160.3240.4320.54SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 30.190.190.480.340.34
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages / Sec Per Watt, More Is BetterIntel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x21601 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.00110.00220.00330.00440.00550.0040.0040.0040.0050.005
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterIntel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150Min: 4.86 / Avg: 45.4 / Max: 72.85Min: 4.83 / Avg: 45.3 / Max: 72.97Min: 5 / Avg: 111.74 / Max: 177.4Min: 3.3 / Avg: 72.85 / Max: 125.42Min: 3.89 / Avg: 72.71 / Max: 126.641. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 7082 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 7068 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 7412 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 6702 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 6641 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterIntel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1632486480Min: 31 / Avg: 50.08 / Max: 64Min: 31 / Avg: 49.77 / Max: 65Min: 32 / Avg: 61.57 / Max: 84Min: 31 / Avg: 45.18 / Max: 73Min: 31 / Avg: 45.77 / Max: 73
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages / Sec, More Is BetterIntel Open Image Denoise 1.4.0Run: RT.ldr_alb_nrm.3840x21601 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E12345Min: 0.19 / Avg: 0.19 / Max: 0.19Min: 0.19 / Avg: 0.19 / Max: 0.19Min: 0.48 / Avg: 0.48 / Max: 0.48Min: 0.34 / Avg: 0.34 / Max: 0.34Min: 0.34 / Avg: 0.34 / Max: 0.34

Coremark

This is a test of EEMBC CoreMark processor benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations/Sec, More Is BetterCoremark 1.0CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E160K320K480K640K800KSE +/- 72.71, N = 3SE +/- 2179.49, N = 3SE +/- 3570.84, N = 3SE +/- 5243.56, N = 15SE +/- 591.99, N = 3288049.01303461.56488917.12515837.62749727.601. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations/Sec Per Watt, More Is BetterCoremark 1.0CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E110022003300440055004888.064428.823223.985179.205255.58
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCoremark 1.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.16 / Avg: 58.93 / Max: 72.44Min: 4.96 / Avg: 68.52 / Max: 80.02Min: 5.26 / Avg: 151.65 / Max: 194.65Min: 4.6 / Avg: 99.6 / Max: 155.05Min: 5 / Avg: 142.65 / Max: 192.781. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2416 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3700 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 5459 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2590 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3709 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterCoremark 1.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 30 / Avg: 48.73 / Max: 55Min: 30 / Avg: 60.14 / Max: 66Min: 31 / Avg: 81.04 / Max: 96Min: 28 / Avg: 55.72 / Max: 71Min: 28 / Avg: 66.58 / Max: 84
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations/Sec, More Is BetterCoremark 1.0CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E130K260K390K520K650KMin: 287916.5 / Avg: 288049.01 / Max: 288167.14Min: 300676.52 / Avg: 303461.56 / Max: 307758.07Min: 482153.62 / Avg: 488917.12 / Max: 494284.83Min: 492257.2 / Avg: 515837.62 / Max: 553346.01Min: 748557.47 / Avg: 749727.6 / Max: 750469.041. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt

SecureMark

SecureMark is an objective, standardized benchmarking framework for measuring the efficiency of cryptographic processing solutions developed by EEMBC. SecureMark-TLS is benchmarking Transport Layer Security performance with a focus on IoT/edge computing. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgmarks, More Is BetterSecureMark 1.0.4Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E80K160K240K320K400KSE +/- 73.99, N = 3SE +/- 87.86, N = 3SE +/- 572.24, N = 3SE +/- 802.50, N = 3SE +/- 2617.02, N = 32447523843593902143830353875811. (CC) gcc options: -pedantic -O3
OpenBenchmarking.orgmarks Per Watt, More Is BetterSecureMark 1.0.4Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E3K6K9K12K15K13502.8412094.5311656.6512276.8511688.37
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSecureMark 1.0.4CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E816243240Min: 2.72 / Avg: 18.13 / Max: 19.48Min: 5.06 / Avg: 31.78 / Max: 35.57Min: 4.84 / Avg: 33.48 / Max: 38.44Min: 5 / Avg: 31.2 / Max: 35.16Min: 4.8 / Avg: 33.16 / Max: 38.051. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 5172 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 9068 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 9563 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 9048 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 9473 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSecureMark 1.0.4CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1326395265Min: 31 / Avg: 37.17 / Max: 43Min: 31 / Avg: 52.43 / Max: 60Min: 27 / Avg: 57.66 / Max: 65Min: 26 / Avg: 33.69 / Max: 40Min: 0 / Avg: 30.11 / Max: 35
OpenBenchmarking.orgmarks, More Is BetterSecureMark 1.0.4Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E70K140K210K280K350KMin: 244610.73 / Avg: 244751.57 / Max: 244861.34Min: 384186.34 / Avg: 384358.54 / Max: 384474.94Min: 389548.56 / Avg: 390214.04 / Max: 391353.16Min: 381514.66 / Avg: 383035.04 / Max: 384240.59Min: 382359.19 / Avg: 387580.97 / Max: 390501.881. (CC) gcc options: -pedantic -O3

Google SynthMark

SynthMark is a cross platform tool for benchmarking CPU performance under a variety of real-time audio workloads. It uses a polyphonic synthesizer model to provide standardized tests for latency, jitter and computational throughput. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgVoices, More Is BetterGoogle SynthMark 20201109Test: VoiceMark_1001 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E2004006008001000SE +/- 7.68, N = 4SE +/- 0.46, N = 2650.591020.581. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -std=c++11 -Ofast
OpenBenchmarking.orgVoices Per Watt, More Is BetterGoogle SynthMark 20201109Test: VoiceMark_1001 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E132639526545.6455.69
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGoogle SynthMark 20201109CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E510152025Min: 4.93 / Avg: 14.25 / Max: 16.4Min: 4.98 / Avg: 18.32 / Max: 21.961. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 485 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1558 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterGoogle SynthMark 20201109CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E816243240Min: 29 / Avg: 33.87 / Max: 36Min: 31 / Avg: 34.39 / Max: 38
OpenBenchmarking.orgVoices, More Is BetterGoogle SynthMark 20201109Test: VoiceMark_1001 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E2004006008001000Min: 627.54 / Avg: 650.59 / Max: 658.55Min: 1020.12 / Avg: 1020.58 / Max: 1021.041. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -std=c++11 -Ofast

Test: VoiceMark_100

8 P + HT: Test failed to run.

8 P + 8 E: Test failed to run.

8 P + HT + 8 E: Test failed to run.

Stockfish

This is a test of Stockfish, an advanced open-source C++11 chess benchmark that can scale up to 512 CPU threads. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterStockfish 13Total Time1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E10M20M30M40M50MSE +/- 92096.32, N = 3SE +/- 88660.61, N = 3SE +/- 239312.63, N = 15SE +/- 448256.37, N = 3SE +/- 687002.66, N = 318009951195341103270006339318554482029651. (CXX) g++ options: -lgcov -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++17 -fprofile-use -fno-peel-loops -fno-tracer -pedantic -O3 -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -mavx2 -msse4.1 -mssse3 -msse2 -mbmi2 -flto -flto=jobserver
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterStockfish 13Total Time1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E60K120K180K240K300K239741.66242477.00181137.09243644.67260531.61
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterStockfish 13CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E50100150200250Min: 5.01 / Avg: 75.12 / Max: 85.97Min: 5.01 / Avg: 80.56 / Max: 93.69Min: 4.89 / Avg: 180.53 / Max: 250.56Min: 4.96 / Avg: 161.38 / Max: 211.93Min: 4.9 / Avg: 185.02 / Max: 251.311. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3230 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3196 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 5596 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3981 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 4872 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterStockfish 13CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 29 / Avg: 56.3 / Max: 63Min: 30 / Avg: 63.05 / Max: 71Min: 25 / Avg: 87.23 / Max: 100Min: 24 / Avg: 67.45 / Max: 81Min: 25 / Avg: 75.09 / Max: 90
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterStockfish 13Total Time1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E8M16M24M32M40MMin: 17907448 / Avg: 18009951.33 / Max: 18193736Min: 19357800 / Avg: 19534109.67 / Max: 19638644Min: 31756514 / Avg: 32700062.67 / Max: 35536287Min: 38857564 / Avg: 39318554 / Max: 40214945Min: 47237268 / Avg: 48202965.33 / Max: 495322711. (CXX) g++ options: -lgcov -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++17 -fprofile-use -fno-peel-loops -fno-tracer -pedantic -O3 -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -mavx2 -msse4.1 -mssse3 -msse2 -mbmi2 -flto -flto=jobserver

TSCP

This is a performance test of TSCP, Tom Kerrigan's Simple Chess Program, which has a built-in performance benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterTSCP 1.81AI Chess Performance1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 1349.00, N = 12SE +/- 895.53, N = 13SE +/- 766.89, N = 13SE +/- 766.89, N = 13SE +/- 407.74, N = 25133496420118372011271201127120107271. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTSCP 1.81AI Chess Performance1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E50K100K150K200K250K164099.69214456.15206628.59217647.59211002.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTSCP 1.81CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E612182430Min: 5.11 / Avg: 8.14 / Max: 18.23Min: 5.06 / Avg: 9.38 / Max: 26.57Min: 4.81 / Avg: 9.73 / Max: 27.63Min: 4.8 / Avg: 9.24 / Max: 26.03Min: 2.57 / Avg: 9.53 / Max: 27.021. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 43 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 45 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 48 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 45 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 46 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTSCP 1.81CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1020304050Min: 31 / Avg: 33.84 / Max: 38Min: 31 / Avg: 35.56 / Max: 52Min: 28 / Avg: 32.17 / Max: 38Min: 27 / Avg: 31.17 / Max: 36Min: 24 / Avg: 28.73 / Max: 36
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterTSCP 1.81AI Chess Performance1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E300K600K900K1200K1500KMin: 1327175 / Avg: 1334963.92 / Max: 1343360Min: 2010138 / Avg: 2011837.15 / Max: 2017501Min: 2010138 / Avg: 2011270.77 / Max: 2017501Min: 2010138 / Avg: 2011270.77 / Max: 2017501Min: 2010138 / Avg: 2010727.04 / Max: 20175011. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native

Crafty

This is a performance test of Crafty, an advanced open-source chess engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterCrafty 25.2Elapsed Time1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E3M6M9M12M15MSE +/- 15457.21, N = 3SE +/- 16091.28, N = 4SE +/- 28326.11, N = 4SE +/- 12784.87, N = 4SE +/- 12094.82, N = 48462623125133381262197712611659126009891. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lstdc++ -fprofile-use -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterCrafty 25.2Elapsed Time1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E110K220K330K440K550K505007.89437024.46439666.41449662.21450088.90
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCrafty 25.2CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E816243240Min: 5.02 / Avg: 16.76 / Max: 19.69Min: 4.97 / Avg: 28.63 / Max: 35.44Min: 4.78 / Avg: 28.71 / Max: 35.23Min: 4.95 / Avg: 28.05 / Max: 34.78Min: 4.8 / Avg: 28 / Max: 35.581. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 452 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 566 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 560 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 554 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 546 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterCrafty 25.2CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1224364860Min: 29 / Avg: 35.35 / Max: 40Min: 31 / Avg: 49.97 / Max: 61Min: 27 / Avg: 32.73 / Max: 35Min: 25 / Avg: 31.84 / Max: 35Min: 23 / Avg: 30.55 / Max: 34
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterCrafty 25.2Elapsed Time1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E2M4M6M8M10MMin: 8433601 / Avg: 8462623.33 / Max: 8486357Min: 12481313 / Avg: 12513338.25 / Max: 12557999Min: 12546031 / Avg: 12621976.75 / Max: 12680667Min: 12574779 / Avg: 12611658.75 / Max: 12631780Min: 12567722 / Avg: 12600988.75 / Max: 126253821. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lstdc++ -fprofile-use -lm

Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation

This test times how long it takes to compile the Godot Game Engine. Godot is a popular, open-source, cross-platform 2D/3D game engine and is built using the SCons build system and targeting the X11 platform. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3Time To Compile1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150SE +/- 0.84, N = 3SE +/- 0.80, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.54, N = 15SE +/- 0.40, N = 3144.28134.6680.6471.4065.73
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTimed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.12 / Avg: 70.54 / Max: 87.31Min: 5.05 / Avg: 77.99 / Max: 91.37Min: 5.12 / Avg: 172.3 / Max: 220.53Min: 4.93 / Avg: 143 / Max: 196.68Min: 5.12 / Avg: 155.03 / Max: 219.61. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 10510 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 10866 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 14703 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 10868 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 10955 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTimed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 29 / Avg: 56.95 / Max: 72Min: 30 / Avg: 64.11 / Max: 76Min: 27 / Avg: 82.73 / Max: 100Min: 26 / Avg: 67.09 / Max: 86Min: 25 / Avg: 69.7 / Max: 89
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3Time To Compile1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150Min: 142.63 / Avg: 144.28 / Max: 145.33Min: 133.11 / Avg: 134.66 / Max: 135.78Min: 80.16 / Avg: 80.64 / Max: 81.17Min: 68.93 / Avg: 71.4 / Max: 75.03Min: 64.96 / Avg: 65.73 / Max: 66.31

Timed Linux Kernel Compilation

This test times how long it takes to build the Linux kernel in a default configuration (defconfig) for the architecture being tested. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14Time To Compile1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150SE +/- 0.90, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.54, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 4SE +/- 0.47, N = 5112.60105.2960.9254.4047.35
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.24 / Avg: 69.22 / Max: 82.52Min: 5.11 / Avg: 78.53 / Max: 88.14Min: 5.46 / Avg: 167.63 / Max: 227.53Min: 5.07 / Avg: 137.19 / Max: 191.21Min: 5.2 / Avg: 156.89 / Max: 221.81. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 8653 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 8874 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 11958 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 9020 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 8880 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 33 / Avg: 57.08 / Max: 68Min: 34 / Avg: 64.88 / Max: 72Min: 32 / Avg: 81.89 / Max: 100Min: 31 / Avg: 65.17 / Max: 85Min: 31 / Avg: 72.96 / Max: 90
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14Time To Compile1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 111.64 / Avg: 112.6 / Max: 114.4Min: 104.82 / Avg: 105.29 / Max: 106.01Min: 60.22 / Avg: 60.92 / Max: 61.98Min: 53.35 / Avg: 54.4 / Max: 56.03Min: 46.41 / Avg: 47.35 / Max: 48.97

Timed Mesa Compilation

This test profile times how long it takes to compile Mesa with Meson/Ninja. For minimizing build dependencies and avoid versioning conflicts, test this is just the core Mesa build without LLVM or the extra Gallium3D/Mesa drivers enabled. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Mesa Compilation 21.0Time To Compile1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1224364860SE +/- 0.26, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.26, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 354.6852.3231.3326.8825.53
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTimed Mesa Compilation 21.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.24 / Avg: 73.06 / Max: 85.91Min: 5.13 / Avg: 79.13 / Max: 90.97Min: 5.32 / Avg: 166.33 / Max: 226.69Min: 2.68 / Avg: 138.6 / Max: 193.21Min: 5.06 / Avg: 150.64 / Max: 220.111. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 4408 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 4537 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 6099 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 4574 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 4670 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTimed Mesa Compilation 21.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 35 / Avg: 58.72 / Max: 71Min: 34 / Avg: 64.88 / Max: 73Min: 34 / Avg: 82.37 / Max: 100Min: 32 / Avg: 65.76 / Max: 86Min: 33 / Avg: 70.63 / Max: 90
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Mesa Compilation 21.0Time To Compile1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1122334455Min: 54.35 / Avg: 54.68 / Max: 55.19Min: 52.03 / Avg: 52.32 / Max: 52.77Min: 31.29 / Avg: 31.33 / Max: 31.36Min: 26.57 / Avg: 26.88 / Max: 27.4Min: 25.38 / Avg: 25.53 / Max: 25.67

Timed FFmpeg Compilation

This test times how long it takes to build the FFmpeg multimedia library. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4Time To Compile1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1428425670SE +/- 0.56, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 15SE +/- 0.33, N = 1563.5861.3735.9831.5028.68
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTimed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.24 / Avg: 70.52 / Max: 85.14Min: 5.12 / Avg: 77.19 / Max: 92.42Min: 5.37 / Avg: 161.58 / Max: 226.03Min: 5.08 / Avg: 142.91 / Max: 195.79Min: 5.06 / Avg: 153.85 / Max: 224.681. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 5007 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 5172 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 6948 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 5192 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 5138 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTimed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 35 / Avg: 58.09 / Max: 68Min: 34 / Avg: 65.35 / Max: 75Min: 0 / Avg: 81.48 / Max: 100Min: 32 / Avg: 67.08 / Max: 85Min: 32 / Avg: 71.87 / Max: 92
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4Time To Compile1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1224364860Min: 62.47 / Avg: 63.58 / Max: 64.21Min: 61.29 / Avg: 61.37 / Max: 61.48Min: 35.94 / Avg: 35.98 / Max: 36.01Min: 29.95 / Avg: 31.5 / Max: 34.05Min: 27.52 / Avg: 28.68 / Max: 30.28

OpenSSL

OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test profile makes use of the built-in "openssl speed" benchmarking capabilities. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgsign/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: RSA40961 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E9001800270036004500SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 4.53, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 22.31, N = 31243.51310.03393.63786.64236.51. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.orgsign/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: RSA40961 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E7001400210028003500Min: 1242.9 / Avg: 1243.47 / Max: 1243.8Min: 1309.9 / Avg: 1310 / Max: 1310.2Min: 3386.3 / Avg: 3393.57 / Max: 3401.9Min: 3786.3 / Avg: 3786.6 / Max: 3787Min: 4212.9 / Avg: 4236.5 / Max: 4281.11. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgverify/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: RSA40961 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E60K120K180K240K300KSE +/- 4.08, N = 3SE +/- 11.12, N = 3SE +/- 135.56, N = 3SE +/- 5.96, N = 3SE +/- 546.17, N = 380958.885954.4220812.1241227.8278744.71. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.orgverify/s Per Watt, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: RSA40961 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E300600900120015001293.951282.261182.611543.221550.77
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.22 / Avg: 62.57 / Max: 68.31Min: 5.07 / Avg: 67.03 / Max: 73.03Min: 5.3 / Avg: 186.72 / Max: 208.48Min: 5.27 / Avg: 156.31 / Max: 170.06Min: 5.14 / Avg: 179.75 / Max: 202.131. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 4004 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 4312 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 11950 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 10056 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 11504 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 35 / Avg: 55.26 / Max: 58Min: 33 / Avg: 62.68 / Max: 68Min: 34 / Avg: 92.69 / Max: 100Min: 32 / Avg: 73.28 / Max: 77Min: 34 / Avg: 82.65 / Max: 89
OpenBenchmarking.orgverify/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: RSA40961 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E50K100K150K200K250KMin: 80954.2 / Avg: 80958.77 / Max: 80966.9Min: 85942.8 / Avg: 85954.37 / Max: 85976.6Min: 220596.7 / Avg: 220812.1 / Max: 221062.4Min: 241216.9 / Avg: 241227.83 / Max: 241237.4Min: 277718.9 / Avg: 278744.7 / Max: 279582.71. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgbyte/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: SHA2561 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E5000M10000M15000M20000M25000MSE +/- 53039025.85, N = 3SE +/- 55204761.90, N = 3SE +/- 13630756.26, N = 3SE +/- 8487160.57, N = 3SE +/- 99673867.94, N = 311107402377116021418001412877632320564402967236597797071. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.orgbyte/s Per Watt, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: SHA2561 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E30M60M90M120M150M149138996.90143658245.5478514001.62121395219.52126128447.59
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.15 / Avg: 74.48 / Max: 96.29Min: 4.88 / Avg: 80.76 / Max: 104.49Min: 5.33 / Avg: 179.95 / Max: 215.79Min: 5.27 / Avg: 169.4 / Max: 212.99Min: 5.34 / Avg: 187.58 / Max: 246.511. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 13704 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 14860 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 33171 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 31170 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 34516 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 35 / Avg: 59 / Max: 68Min: 33 / Avg: 67.68 / Max: 78Min: 35 / Avg: 90.82 / Max: 98Min: 32 / Avg: 76.25 / Max: 88Min: 34 / Avg: 84.28 / Max: 98
OpenBenchmarking.orgbyte/s, More Is BetterOpenSSL 3.0Algorithm: SHA2561 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4000M8000M12000M16000M20000MMin: 11003940800 / Avg: 11107402376.67 / Max: 11179411020Min: 11494580910 / Avg: 11602141800 / Max: 11677502060Min: 14109610240 / Avg: 14128776323.33 / Max: 14155148900Min: 20555571240 / Avg: 20564402966.67 / Max: 20581372560Min: 23460969550 / Avg: 23659779706.67 / Max: 237718548701. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

PlaidML

This test profile uses PlaidML deep learning framework developed by Intel for offering up various benchmarks. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterPlaidMLFP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E612182430SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 89.6210.2624.0424.5524.64
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS Per Watt, More Is BetterPlaidMLFP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.03290.06580.09870.13160.16450.1170.1150.1450.1460.139
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterPlaidMLCPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.13 / Avg: 82.08 / Max: 98.74Min: 5.14 / Avg: 88.97 / Max: 102.33Min: 5.2 / Avg: 165.26 / Max: 206.1Min: 4.81 / Avg: 168.64 / Max: 210.05Min: 5.13 / Avg: 177.33 / Max: 226.681. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 19015 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 19188 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 16251 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 16358 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 16736 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterPlaidMLCPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 33 / Avg: 63.27 / Max: 71Min: 33 / Avg: 68.06 / Max: 75Min: 31 / Avg: 77.25 / Max: 98Min: 32 / Avg: 69.55 / Max: 86Min: 0 / Avg: 73.6 / Max: 92
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterPlaidMLFP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E612182430Min: 9.4 / Avg: 9.62 / Max: 9.78Min: 10.19 / Avg: 10.26 / Max: 10.36Min: 24.03 / Avg: 24.04 / Max: 24.05Min: 24.34 / Avg: 24.55 / Max: 24.67Min: 23.21 / Avg: 24.64 / Max: 25.26

OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterPlaidMLFP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E510152025SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 37.608.0519.7319.7320.55
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS Per Watt, More Is BetterPlaidMLFP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.02570.05140.07710.10280.12850.0900.0890.1140.1100.112
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterPlaidMLCPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.17 / Avg: 84.19 / Max: 98.98Min: 5.17 / Avg: 90.24 / Max: 102.9Min: 5.3 / Avg: 173.75 / Max: 205.38Min: 5.35 / Avg: 178.62 / Max: 208.2Min: 5.29 / Avg: 183.7 / Max: 225.411. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 24330 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 24577 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 20502 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 21077 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 20881 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterPlaidMLCPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 33 / Avg: 63.99 / Max: 71Min: 34 / Avg: 67.91 / Max: 76Min: 32 / Avg: 76 / Max: 98Min: 32 / Avg: 72.42 / Max: 88Min: 34 / Avg: 74.35 / Max: 93
OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterPlaidMLFP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E510152025Min: 7.55 / Avg: 7.6 / Max: 7.65Min: 7.93 / Avg: 8.05 / Max: 8.13Min: 19.65 / Avg: 19.73 / Max: 19.81Min: 19.63 / Avg: 19.73 / Max: 19.82Min: 20.52 / Avg: 20.55 / Max: 20.57

ONNX Runtime

ONNX Runtime is developed by Microsoft and partners as a open-source, cross-platform, high performance machine learning inferencing and training accelerator. This test profile runs the ONNX Runtime with various models available from the ONNX Zoo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgInferences Per Minute, More Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E140280420560700SE +/- 1.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 1.04, N = 32342265085706621. (CXX) g++ options: -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
OpenBenchmarking.orgInferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.99861.99722.99583.99444.9934.3324.0544.4384.4133.850
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.12 / Avg: 54.02 / Max: 58.21Min: 5.1 / Avg: 55.75 / Max: 59.2Min: 5.36 / Avg: 114.46 / Max: 119.71Min: 5.31 / Avg: 129.17 / Max: 136.26Min: 5.32 / Avg: 171.93 / Max: 193.531. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 6771 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 6969 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 14270 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 16104 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 21491 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 34 / Avg: 59.51 / Max: 65Min: 34 / Avg: 58.62 / Max: 64Min: 34 / Avg: 73.84 / Max: 81Min: 35 / Avg: 68.96 / Max: 78Min: 36 / Avg: 82.9 / Max: 96
OpenBenchmarking.orgInferences Per Minute, More Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10Model: yolov4 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E120240360480600Min: 233 / Avg: 234.33 / Max: 237Min: 225.5 / Avg: 225.83 / Max: 226Min: 507.5 / Avg: 508.33 / Max: 509Min: 569.5 / Avg: 570.33 / Max: 571Min: 660 / Avg: 661.5 / Max: 663.51. (CXX) g++ options: -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt

OpenBenchmarking.orgInferences Per Minute, More Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.73, N = 334327698961. (CXX) g++ options: -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
OpenBenchmarking.orgInferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.15350.3070.46050.6140.76750.6240.5710.6790.6820.558
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.18 / Avg: 54.51 / Max: 57.54Min: 5.11 / Avg: 56.08 / Max: 60.45Min: 5.37 / Avg: 111.88 / Max: 117.93Min: 5.13 / Avg: 143.64 / Max: 150.88Min: 5.27 / Avg: 171.96 / Max: 199.221. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 6959 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 7123 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 14059 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 18003 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 21553 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 33 / Avg: 59.49 / Max: 64Min: 33 / Avg: 59.24 / Max: 65Min: 32 / Avg: 73.18 / Max: 81Min: 32 / Avg: 72.59 / Max: 81Min: 34 / Avg: 86.91 / Max: 98
OpenBenchmarking.orgInferences Per Minute, More Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 34 / Avg: 34 / Max: 34Min: 32 / Avg: 32 / Max: 32Min: 76 / Avg: 76.17 / Max: 76.5Min: 98 / Avg: 98 / Max: 98Min: 95 / Avg: 96.33 / Max: 97.51. (CXX) g++ options: -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt

OpenBenchmarking.orgInferences Per Minute, More Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E10K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 28.76, N = 3SE +/- 118.51, N = 3SE +/- 21.81, N = 3SE +/- 24.12, N = 3SE +/- 133.90, N = 322717228034102529499469981. (CXX) g++ options: -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
OpenBenchmarking.orgInferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E110220330440550518.14488.43438.21326.47354.53
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150Min: 5.1 / Avg: 43.84 / Max: 45.58Min: 5.07 / Avg: 46.69 / Max: 48.86Min: 5.28 / Avg: 93.62 / Max: 97.45Min: 2.67 / Avg: 90.36 / Max: 94.29Min: 5.35 / Avg: 132.56 / Max: 139.031. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 5451 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 5789 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 11640 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 11235 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 16438 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1428425670Min: 33 / Avg: 51.1 / Max: 55Min: 33 / Avg: 50.84 / Max: 54Min: 32 / Avg: 63.6 / Max: 66Min: 31 / Avg: 56.34 / Max: 60Min: 32 / Avg: 69.52 / Max: 74
OpenBenchmarking.orgInferences Per Minute, More Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E8K16K24K32K40KMin: 22665.5 / Avg: 22716.67 / Max: 22765Min: 22567.5 / Avg: 22803 / Max: 22944Min: 40987.5 / Avg: 41024.5 / Max: 41063Min: 29468 / Avg: 29499 / Max: 29546.5Min: 46794 / Avg: 46997.5 / Max: 472501. (CXX) g++ options: -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt

OpenBenchmarking.orgInferences Per Minute, More Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E12002400360048006000SE +/- 4.04, N = 3SE +/- 1.45, N = 3SE +/- 0.73, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 37.75, N = 3193019934604552146171. (CXX) g++ options: -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt
OpenBenchmarking.orgInferences Per Minute Per Watt, More Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E102030405037.2535.6540.0541.6629.73
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150Min: 5.21 / Avg: 51.82 / Max: 54.87Min: 5.08 / Avg: 55.91 / Max: 59.17Min: 5.33 / Avg: 114.96 / Max: 120.38Min: 5.11 / Avg: 132.54 / Max: 137.9Min: 5.01 / Avg: 155.3 / Max: 168.791. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 6426 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 6951 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 14217 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 16435 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 19257 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 33 / Avg: 57.88 / Max: 63Min: 33 / Avg: 59.59 / Max: 65Min: 32 / Avg: 75.83 / Max: 80Min: 31 / Avg: 70.45 / Max: 77Min: 33 / Avg: 80.12 / Max: 90
OpenBenchmarking.orgInferences Per Minute, More Is BetterONNX Runtime 1.10Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E10002000300040005000Min: 1922.5 / Avg: 1930.33 / Max: 1936Min: 1990 / Avg: 1992.67 / Max: 1995Min: 4602.5 / Avg: 4603.67 / Max: 4605Min: 5520.5 / Avg: 5521.33 / Max: 5522Min: 4541.5 / Avg: 4617 / Max: 46551. (CXX) g++ options: -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -flto -fno-fat-lto-objects -ldl -lrt

Sysbench

This is a benchmark of Sysbench with the built-in CPU and memory sub-tests. Sysbench is a scriptable multi-threaded benchmark tool based on LuaJIT. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgEvents Per Second, More Is BetterSysbench 1.0.20Test: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 5.82, N = 3SE +/- 12.47, N = 3SE +/- 0.91, N = 3SE +/- 6.04, N = 3SE +/- 4.21, N = 331830.7832072.9235660.3361044.2863122.121. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -funroll-loops -rdynamic -ldl -laio -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgEvents Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterSysbench 1.0.20Test: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E120240360480600544.74545.35303.52480.98481.43
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSysbench 1.0.20CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150Min: 5.13 / Avg: 58.43 / Max: 62.21Min: 5.03 / Avg: 58.81 / Max: 62.28Min: 5.32 / Avg: 117.49 / Max: 124.63Min: 5.2 / Avg: 126.92 / Max: 134.09Min: 4.85 / Avg: 131.11 / Max: 137.991. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 5493 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 5528 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 11083 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 11972 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 12325 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSysbench 1.0.20CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1428425670Min: 33 / Avg: 50.1 / Max: 52Min: 33 / Avg: 50.16 / Max: 52Min: 31 / Avg: 67.71 / Max: 73Min: 33 / Avg: 63.97 / Max: 69Min: 32 / Avg: 65.77 / Max: 70
OpenBenchmarking.orgEvents Per Second, More Is BetterSysbench 1.0.20Test: CPU1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E11K22K33K44K55KMin: 31821.34 / Avg: 31830.78 / Max: 31841.4Min: 32060.14 / Avg: 32072.92 / Max: 32097.85Min: 35658.88 / Avg: 35660.33 / Max: 35662.02Min: 61032.75 / Avg: 61044.28 / Max: 61053.18Min: 63113.95 / Avg: 63122.12 / Max: 63127.991. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -funroll-loops -rdynamic -ldl -laio -lm

Selenium

This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers such as Firefox and Google Chrome. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E50100150200250SE +/- 0.68, N = 3SE +/- 2.05, N = 12SE +/- 1.95, N = 3SE +/- 7.51, N = 12SE +/- 6.73, N = 15161.29167.25244.43193.60212.261. chrome 95.0.4638.69
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E36912159.2848.2266.8307.7787.893
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumCPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E306090120150Min: 5.13 / Avg: 17.37 / Max: 47.66Min: 2.67 / Avg: 20.33 / Max: 55.45Min: 5.16 / Avg: 35.79 / Max: 150.94Min: 4.83 / Avg: 24.89 / Max: 76.33Min: 4.82 / Avg: 26.89 / Max: 91.391. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3092 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2894 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 3591 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 2968 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 3042 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumCPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1428425670Min: 29 / Avg: 36.11 / Max: 58Min: 29 / Avg: 38.19 / Max: 63Min: 25 / Avg: 38.15 / Max: 74Min: 25 / Avg: 31.21 / Max: 70Min: 0 / Avg: 31.92 / Max: 66
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 160.17 / Avg: 161.29 / Max: 162.52Min: 156.96 / Avg: 167.25 / Max: 177.49Min: 240.54 / Avg: 244.43 / Max: 246.5Min: 160.08 / Avg: 193.6 / Max: 235.36Min: 172.08 / Avg: 212.26 / Max: 249.711. chrome 95.0.4638.69

OpenBenchmarking.orgRuns / Minute, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1428425670SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 2.51, N = 15SE +/- 2.08, N = 1542.9043.0064.8056.3360.501. chrome 95.0.4638.69
OpenBenchmarking.orgRuns / Minute Per Watt, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E0.58341.16681.75022.33362.9172.4742.3732.3022.5932.518
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumCPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1020304050Min: 4.99 / Avg: 17.34 / Max: 32.8Min: 5.05 / Avg: 18.12 / Max: 33.31Min: 5.05 / Avg: 28.15 / Max: 46.79Min: 4.76 / Avg: 21.72 / Max: 37.16Min: 4.79 / Avg: 24.03 / Max: 39.61. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1734 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1788 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 2017 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1807 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 1876 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumCPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1224364860Min: 29 / Avg: 36.18 / Max: 56Min: 30 / Avg: 37.65 / Max: 56Min: 27 / Avg: 38.93 / Max: 62Min: 0 / Avg: 29.16 / Max: 61Min: 25 / Avg: 32.19 / Max: 62
OpenBenchmarking.orgRuns / Minute, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1326395265Min: 42.4 / Avg: 42.93 / Max: 43.7Min: 42.7 / Avg: 43.03 / Max: 43.7Min: 64.2 / Avg: 64.8 / Max: 65.3Min: 41.09 / Avg: 56.33 / Max: 66.3Min: 41.1 / Avg: 60.46 / Max: 65.81. chrome 95.0.4638.69

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E7001400210028003500SE +/- 33.17, N = 3SE +/- 15.24, N = 3SE +/- 16.37, N = 3SE +/- 54.67, N = 15SE +/- 34.70, N = 3309831122575289330651. chrome 95.0.4638.69
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumCPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 5.05 / Avg: 16.32 / Max: 64.91Min: 5.18 / Avg: 17.12 / Max: 68.31Min: 4.91 / Avg: 23.68 / Max: 129.14Min: 4.84 / Avg: 19.61 / Max: 114.51Min: 5.11 / Avg: 20.05 / Max: 122.71. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 620 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 645 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 774 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 698 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 749 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumCPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1224364860Min: 29 / Avg: 33.32 / Max: 55Min: 31 / Avg: 34.35 / Max: 55Min: 27 / Avg: 31.84 / Max: 63Min: 23 / Avg: 29.1 / Max: 63Min: 25 / Avg: 28.96 / Max: 55
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E5001000150020002500Min: 3033 / Avg: 3098 / Max: 3142Min: 3082 / Avg: 3112.33 / Max: 3130Min: 2553 / Avg: 2575 / Max: 2607Min: 2550 / Avg: 2892.67 / Max: 3122Min: 3024 / Avg: 3065 / Max: 31341. chrome 95.0.4638.69

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E90180270360450SE +/- 0.05, N = 4SE +/- 14.35, N = 14SE +/- 0.24, N = 5SE +/- 25.70, N = 15SE +/- 26.65, N = 15413.49399.06211.44345.43320.171. chrome 95.0.4638.69
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumCPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E816243240Min: 5.02 / Avg: 12.47 / Max: 18.85Min: 4.85 / Avg: 12.78 / Max: 36.32Min: 5.16 / Avg: 15.95 / Max: 36.62Min: 4.76 / Avg: 13.26 / Max: 36.98Min: 4.92 / Avg: 14.1 / Max: 37.491. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 252 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 250 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 236 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 242 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 246 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumCPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1122334455Min: 29 / Avg: 35.89 / Max: 45Min: 29 / Avg: 36.43 / Max: 55Min: 25 / Avg: 28.86 / Max: 40Min: 23 / Avg: 26.19 / Max: 58Min: 24 / Avg: 27.24 / Max: 58
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E70140210280350Min: 413.35 / Avg: 413.49 / Max: 413.58Min: 212.45 / Avg: 399.06 / Max: 413.55Min: 210.77 / Avg: 211.44 / Max: 212.2Min: 207.23 / Avg: 345.43 / Max: 413.56Min: 207.09 / Avg: 320.17 / Max: 413.551. chrome 95.0.4638.69

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E714212835SE +/- 1.39, N = 15SE +/- 0.18, N = 6SE +/- 0.09, N = 6SE +/- 1.77, N = 15SE +/- 1.64, N = 1528.5331.1617.9125.0722.461. chrome 95.0.4638.69
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumCPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E612182430Min: 3.19 / Avg: 8.08 / Max: 22.76Min: 4.9 / Avg: 7.91 / Max: 19.1Min: 5.06 / Avg: 9.3 / Max: 24.68Min: 4.71 / Avg: 8.31 / Max: 23.13Min: 5.02 / Avg: 8.71 / Max: 23.661. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 88 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 87 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 98 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 90 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 93 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumCPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1224364860Min: 28 / Avg: 29.29 / Max: 38Min: 28 / Avg: 30.15 / Max: 40Min: 24 / Avg: 26.22 / Max: 37Min: 21 / Avg: 24.43 / Max: 59Min: 23 / Avg: 24.92 / Max: 46
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E714212835Min: 18.14 / Avg: 28.53 / Max: 32.08Min: 30.88 / Avg: 31.16 / Max: 32.03Min: 17.63 / Avg: 17.91 / Max: 18.13Min: 17.67 / Avg: 25.07 / Max: 31.99Min: 17.83 / Avg: 22.46 / Max: 31.551. chrome 95.0.4638.69

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E160320480640800SE +/- 8.65, N = 3SE +/- 8.52, N = 15SE +/- 1.18, N = 3SE +/- 42.76, N = 12SE +/- 36.29, N = 15760.3755.0441.4586.5525.21. chrome 95.0.4638.69
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumCPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E918273645Min: 4.97 / Avg: 12.92 / Max: 25.26Min: 4.84 / Avg: 13.32 / Max: 31.29Min: 5.13 / Avg: 18.56 / Max: 43.66Min: 4.47 / Avg: 14.73 / Max: 36.96Min: 2.64 / Avg: 15.52 / Max: 37.221. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 336 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 341 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 396 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 346 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 351 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumCPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E1224364860Min: 28 / Avg: 32.56 / Max: 45Min: 28 / Avg: 33.04 / Max: 52Min: 23 / Avg: 31.92 / Max: 62Min: 23 / Avg: 26.06 / Max: 49Min: 0 / Avg: 26.34 / Max: 56
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E130260390520650Min: 748.7 / Avg: 760.27 / Max: 777.2Min: 678.9 / Avg: 755.03 / Max: 790Min: 439.1 / Avg: 441.43 / Max: 442.9Min: 438.9 / Avg: 586.47 / Max: 767.3Min: 439.2 / Avg: 525.24 / Max: 762.31. chrome 95.0.4638.69

Blender

Blender is an open-source 3D creation and modeling software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles benchmark with various sample files. GPU computing via NVIDIA OptiX and NVIDIA CUDA is currently supported. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 3.0Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E50100150200250SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.37, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.83, N = 3216.97200.60104.7693.1076.43
OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterBlender 3.0CPU Power Consumption Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 5.05 / Avg: 75.37 / Max: 78.18Min: 4.93 / Avg: 82.11 / Max: 85.62Min: 5.21 / Avg: 200.19 / Max: 244Min: 4.91 / Avg: 184.49 / Max: 199.71Min: 5.12 / Avg: 204.17 / Max: 245.921. 1 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 16707 Joules per run.2. 1 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 16805 Joules per run.3. 8 P + HT: Approximate power consumption of 21888 Joules per run.4. 8 P + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 18080 Joules per run.5. 8 P + HT + 8 E: Approximate power consumption of 16538 Joules per run.
OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterBlender 3.0CPU Temperature Monitor1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 29 / Avg: 58.64 / Max: 62Min: 29 / Avg: 69.13 / Max: 73Min: 25 / Avg: 93.03 / Max: 100Min: 24 / Avg: 76.17 / Max: 84Min: 24 / Avg: 86.1 / Max: 100
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 3.0Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E4080120160200Min: 216.48 / Avg: 216.97 / Max: 217.45Min: 200.18 / Avg: 200.6 / Max: 201.35Min: 104.16 / Avg: 104.76 / Max: 105.06Min: 93.02 / Avg: 93.1 / Max: 93.15Min: 74.79 / Avg: 76.43 / Max: 77.49

Meta Performance Per Watts

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watts, More Is BetterMeta Performance Per WattsPerformance Per Watts1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E150300450600750371.31399.20678.36622.29695.26

CPU Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsCPU Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System Monitoring1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E50100150200250Min: 2.72 / Avg: 49.29 / Max: 98.98Min: 2.59 / Avg: 53.77 / Max: 104.49Min: 2.57 / Avg: 108.28 / Max: 250.56Min: 2.54 / Avg: 77.93 / Max: 222.52Min: 2.56 / Avg: 85.96 / Max: 259.68

CPU Temperature Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsiusCPU Temperature MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System Monitoring1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E20406080100Min: 28 / Avg: 50.2 / Max: 75Min: 28 / Avg: 54.28 / Max: 78Min: 0 / Avg: 63.63 / Max: 100Min: 0 / Avg: 47.53 / Max: 90Min: 0 / Avg: 50.88 / Max: 100

Geometric Mean Of All Test Results

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean, More Is BetterGeometric Mean Of All Test ResultsResult Composite - Intel Core i9 12900K Core Configurations Linux1 P + 8 E1 P + HT + 8 E8 P + HT8 P + 8 E8 P + HT + 8 E30609012015068.1673.62125.07118.13131.27

84 Results Shown

Tesseract:
  1920 x 1080
  3840 x 2160
Xonotic:
  3840 x 2160 - Ultra
  3840 x 2160 - Ultimate
Unvanquished:
  1920 x 1080 - High
  1920 x 1080 - Ultra
  3840 x 2160 - High
  3840 x 2160 - Ultra
NAMD
GROMACS
Xmrig:
  Monero - 1M
  Wownero - 1M
Zstd Compression:
  19 - Compression Speed
  19 - Decompression Speed
  19, Long Mode - Compression Speed
  19, Long Mode - Decompression Speed
7-Zip Compression:
  Compression Rating
  Decompression Rating
libavif avifenc:
  2
  6
  6, Lossless
ASTC Encoder:
  Thorough
  Exhaustive
JPEG XL libjxl:
  JPEG - 8
  PNG - 8
Hugin
RawTherapee
LibRaw
Basis Universal:
  ETC1S
  UASTC Level 3
KTX-Software toktx:
  Zstd Compression 9
  Zstd Compression 19
  UASTC 3
  UASTC 3 + Zstd Compression 19
  UASTC 4 + Zstd Compression 19
CLOMP
Primesieve
SVT-AV1
SVT-VP9:
  PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p
  VMAF Optimized - Bosphorus 1080p
SVT-HEVC:
  7 - Bosphorus 1080p
  10 - Bosphorus 1080p
rav1e:
  10
  6
  5
AOM AV1:
  Speed 10 Realtime - Bosphorus 4K
  Speed 9 Realtime - Bosphorus 4K
  Speed 6 Realtime - Bosphorus 4K
OSPray:
  NASA Streamlines - SciVis
  NASA Streamlines - Path Tracer
Embree:
  Pathtracer - Crown
  Pathtracer ISPC - Crown
Intel Open Image Denoise
Coremark
SecureMark
Google SynthMark
Stockfish
TSCP
Crafty
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation
Timed Mesa Compilation
Timed FFmpeg Compilation
OpenSSL:
  RSA4096:
    sign/s
    verify/s
  SHA256:
    byte/s
PlaidML:
  No - Inference - VGG16 - CPU
  No - Inference - VGG19 - CPU
ONNX Runtime:
  yolov4 - CPU
  fcn-resnet101-11 - CPU
  shufflenet-v2-10 - CPU
  super-resolution-10 - CPU
Sysbench
Selenium:
  Jetstream 2 - Google Chrome
  StyleBench - Google Chrome
  PSPDFKit WASM - Google Chrome
  WASM collisionDetection - Google Chrome
  WASM imageConvolute - Google Chrome
  Kraken - Google Chrome
Blender
Meta Performance Per Watts:
  Performance Per Watts
  Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring
  Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring
  Result Composite - Intel Core i9 12900K Core Configurations Linux

1 P + 8 E

Processor: Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (9 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (0803 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7aa7, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0, Graphics: Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 16GB (2575/1000MHz), Audio: Intel Device 7ad0, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411

OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.15.7-051507-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2 (LLVM 12.0.1), Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave (EPP: balance_performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x15 - Thermald 2.4.6
Graphics Notes: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 16368 MB
Python Notes: Python 3.9.7
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Testing initiated at 13 December 2021 05:07 by user phoronix.

1 P + HT + 8 E

Processor: Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (9 Cores / 10 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (0803 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7aa7, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0, Graphics: Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 16GB (2575/1000MHz), Audio: Intel Device 7ad0, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411

OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.15.7-051507-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2 (LLVM 12.0.1), Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave (EPP: balance_performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x15 - Thermald 2.4.6
Graphics Notes: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 16368 MB
Python Notes: Python 3.9.7
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Testing initiated at 12 December 2021 17:47 by user phoronix.

8 P + HT

Processor: Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (0803 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7aa7, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0, Graphics: Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 16GB (2575/1000MHz), Audio: Intel Device 7ad0, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411

OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.15.7-051507-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2 (LLVM 12.0.1), Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave (EPP: balance_performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x15 - Thermald 2.4.6
Graphics Notes: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 16368 MB
Python Notes: Python 3.9.7
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Testing initiated at 12 December 2021 12:47 by user phoronix.

8 P + 8 E

Processor: Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (0803 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7aa7, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0, Graphics: Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 16GB (2575/1000MHz), Audio: Intel Device 7ad0, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411

OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.15.7-051507-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2 (LLVM 12.0.1), Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave (EPP: balance_performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x15 - Thermald 2.4.6
Graphics Notes: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 16368 MB
Python Notes: Python 3.9.7
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Testing initiated at 12 December 2021 04:53 by user phoronix.

8 P + HT + 8 E

Processor: Intel Core i9-12900K @ 6.50GHz (16 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI (0803 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 7aa7, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0, Graphics: Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 16GB (2575/1000MHz), Audio: Intel Device 7ad0, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Intel I225-V + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411

OS: Ubuntu 21.10, Kernel: 5.15.7-051507-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 40.5, Display Server: X Server 1.20.13 + Wayland, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.2.2 (LLVM 12.0.1), Vulkan: 1.2.182, Compiler: GCC 11.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: Transparent Huge Pages: madvise
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-cet --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-serialization=2 --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave (EPP: balance_performance) - CPU Microcode: 0x15 - Thermald 2.4.6
Graphics Notes: BAR1 / Visible vRAM Size: 16368 MB
Python Notes: Python 3.9.7
Security Notes: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Testing initiated at 11 December 2021 14:59 by user phoronix.