KarinaTest1

probamos

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1912276-KH-KARINATES73
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
KarinaTest1
December 27 2019
 
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

KarinaTest1

Processor: Intel Core i7-8550U @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS UX410UAR v1.0, Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 1000GB TOSHIBA MQ04ABF1 + 128GB HFS128G39TND-N21, Graphics: Intel UHD 620, Audio: Conexant Generic, Network: Intel Wireless 8265 / 8275

OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.0-72-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Xfce 4.12, Display Driver: modesetting 1.19.6, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.8, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Disk Notes: CFQ / data=ordered,relatime,rw
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave
System Notes: Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Python 2.7.17. This was running on battery power.

KarinaTest1OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i7-8550U @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores)ASUS UX410UAR v1.0Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th8192MB1000GB TOSHIBA MQ04ABF1 + 128GB HFS128G39TND-N21Intel UHD 620Conexant GenericIntel Wireless 8265 / 8275Ubuntu 18.044.15.0-72-generic (x86_64)Xfce 4.12modesetting 1.19.64.5 Mesa 19.0.8ext41920x1080ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay DriverOpenGLFile-SystemScreen ResolutionKarinaTest1 BenchmarksSystem Logs- CFQ / data=ordered,relatime,rw- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Python 2.7.17. This was running on battery power.

KarinaTest1sqlite: Timed SQLite Insertionsfs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Sizefs-mark: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threadsfs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Sizefs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSyncdbench: 12 Clientsdbench: 1 Clientscompilebench: Compilecompilebench: Initial Createcompilebench: Read Compiled Treepostmark: Disk Transaction PerformanceKarinaTest181.9857.4793.6057.331246.40287.1666.81300.52210.22767.134777OpenBenchmarking.org

SQLite

This is a simple benchmark of SQLite. At present this test profile just measures the time to perform a pre-defined number of insertions on an indexed database. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.30.1Timed SQLite InsertionsKarinaTest120406080100SE +/- 0.14, N = 381.98

FS-Mark

FS_Mark is designed to test a system's file-system performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB SizeKarinaTest11326395265SE +/- 0.03, N = 357.47

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 ThreadsKarinaTest120406080100SE +/- 0.00, N = 393.60

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB SizeKarinaTest11326395265SE +/- 0.22, N = 357.33

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSyncKarinaTest130060090012001500SE +/- 22.22, N = 31246.40

Dbench

Dbench is a benchmark designed by the Samba project as a free alternative to netbench, but dbench contains only file-system calls for testing the disk performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.012 ClientsKarinaTest160120180240300SE +/- 0.38, N = 3287.16

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.01 ClientsKarinaTest11530456075SE +/- 0.15, N = 366.81

Compile Bench

Compilebench tries to age a filesystem by simulating some of the disk IO common in creating, compiling, patching, stating and reading kernel trees. It indirectly measures how well filesystems can maintain directory locality as the disk fills up and directories age. This current test is setup to use the makej mode with 10 initial directories Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: CompileKarinaTest170140210280350SE +/- 1.77, N = 3300.52

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Initial CreateKarinaTest150100150200250SE +/- 2.20, N = 3210.22

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Read Compiled TreeKarinaTest1170340510680850SE +/- 7.39, N = 3767.13

PostMark

This is a test of NetApp's PostMark benchmark designed to simulate small-file testing similar to the tasks endured by web and mail servers. This test profile will set PostMark to perform 25,000 transactions with 500 files simultaneously with the file sizes ranging between 5 and 512 kilobytes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostMark 1.51Disk Transaction PerformanceKarinaTest110002000300040005000SE +/- 30.33, N = 34777

KarinaTest1

Processor: Intel Core i7-8550U @ 4.00GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS UX410UAR v1.0, Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 1000GB TOSHIBA MQ04ABF1 + 128GB HFS128G39TND-N21, Graphics: Intel UHD 620, Audio: Conexant Generic, Network: Intel Wireless 8265 / 8275

OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.0-72-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Xfce 4.12, Display Driver: modesetting 1.19.6, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.8, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

Disk Notes: CFQ / data=ordered,relatime,rw
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave
System Notes: Disk Scheduler: CFQ. Python 2.7.17. This was running on battery power.

Testing initiated at 27 December 2019 20:11 by user bestia.