Low End GPU

Intel Core i9-9900KS testing with a ASUS PRIME Z390-A (1302 BIOS) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1911278-HU-LOWENDGPU50
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
RTX 2060
November 27 2019
  7 Hours, 21 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Low End GPUOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test Suite 10.6.1Intel Core i9-9900KS @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)ASUS PRIME Z390-A (1302 BIOS)Intel Cannon Lake PCH16384MBSamsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENTNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB (1365/7000MHz)Realtek ALC1220Acer B286HKIntel I219-VUbuntu 19.105.3.0-23-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.34.1X Server 1.20.5NVIDIA 440.364.6.01.1.119GCC 9.2.1 20191008ext41920x1080ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionLow End GPU BenchmarksSystem Logs- --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance - CPU Microcode: 0xc6- GPU Compute Cores: 1920- Python 2.7.17rc1 + Python 3.7.5rc1- itlb_multihit: KVM: Vulnerable + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + tsx_async_abort: Mitigation of TSX disabled

Low End GPUbatman-origins: 1920 x 1080csgo: 1920 x 1080dota2: 1920 x 1080 - OpenGLdota2: 1920 x 1080 - Vulkandeus-exmd: 1920 x 1080 - High Qualitydirt-rally2: 1920 x 1080 - Highf12017: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - Offf12017: 1920 x 1080 - High - Offf12017: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra High - Offhitman: 1920 x 1080 - Ultrahitman2: 1920 x 1080 - Ultrariseofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - FXAA - Spine Of The Mountainriseofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - FXAA - Prophets Tombriseofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - FXAA - Geothermal Valleyriseofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Very High - FXAA - Spine Of The Mountainriseofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Very High - FXAA - Prophets Tombriseofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Very High - FXAA - Geothermal Valleyshadowofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - Offshadowofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - SMAAshadowofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Highest - Offshadowofthetombraider: 1920 x 1080 - Highest - SMAAstrange-brigade: 1920 x 1080 - Highstrange-brigade: 1920 x 1080 - Ultratww2: 1920 x 1080 - High - Skaven Battletww2: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra - Skaven Battletwtk: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - Battle Benchmarktwtk: 1920 x 1080 - High - Battle Benchmarktwtk: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra - Battle Benchmarkdow3: 1920 x 1080 - High - Vulkanxplane11: Medium - 1920 x 1080xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimatetesseract: 1920 x 1080etlegacy: Renderer2 - 1920 x 1080selenium: MotionMark - Firefoxselenium: MotionMark - Google Chromeselenium: CanvasMark - Firefoxselenium: CanvasMark - Google Chromeparaview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080blender: BMW27 - CUDAblender: Classroom - CUDAoctanebench: Total Scoreindigobench: Supercarindigobench: Bedroomneatbench: GPUluxmark: GPU - Luxball HDRluxmark: GPU - Microphoneluxmark: GPU - HotelRTX 2060142.07215.8146.4140.770.8106.04101516815412080.8590.97176.2131.7139.9147.5117.7109.9102.9102.984.985.0172.4156.7102.771.6109.071.649.8105.369469132.93313.8793565475.1243270.0293.10755.75151142112440.904100.751183.461911.859280.064480.89671.38294.18165.91203816.2834.43128.221724137344915OpenBenchmarking.org

Batman: Arkham Origins

This is a benchmark of >Batman: Arkham Origins running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that Batman: Arkham Origins is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterBatman: Arkham OriginsResolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 2060306090120150SE +/- 0.75, N = 3142.07MIN: 38.86 / MAX: 260.99

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterBatman: Arkham OriginsResolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 20600.58281.16561.74842.33122.9142.59

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.2854.8107.97OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterBatman: Arkham OriginsGPU Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

MinAvgMaxRTX 206029.0042.451.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterBatman: Arkham OriginsGPU Temperature Monitor1530456075

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

This is a benchmark of Valve's Counter-Strike: Global Offensive game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is already installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 206050100150200250SE +/- 5.34, N = 15215.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame TimeRTX 20605001000150020002500Min: 1.93 / Avg: 5.93 / Max: 2771.26

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.2145.5133.11OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206038.0042.950.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterCounter-Strike: Global OffensiveGPU Temperature Monitor1428425670

Dota 2

This is a benchmark of Valve's Dota 2 game. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you have rights to Dota 2. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized time demo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLRTX 2060306090120150SE +/- 1.34, N = 10146.4MIN: 134.8 / MAX: 149.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGLRTX 20600.60081.20161.80242.40323.0042.67

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.1954.8139.52OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDota 2GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206040.0044.650.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterDota 2GPU Temperature Monitor1428425670

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: VulkanRTX 2060306090120150SE +/- 1.76, N = 5140.7MIN: 133.7 / MAX: 142.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDota 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: VulkanRTX 20600.54681.09361.64042.18722.7342.43

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.4657.8143.70OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDota 2GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206041.0045.650.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterDota 2GPU Temperature Monitor1428425670

Deus Ex: Mankind Divided

This is a benchmark of Deus Ex: Mankind Divided on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedPreset: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityRTX 20601632486480SE +/- 0.24, N = 370.8MIN: 53.4 / MAX: 93.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedPreset: 1920 x 1080 - High QualityRTX 20600.24980.49960.74940.99921.2491.11

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.4164.0146.41OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206031.0046.168.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterDeus Ex: Mankind DividedGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

DiRT Rally 2.0

This is a benchmark of DiRT Rally 2.0 running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that the game is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized scene. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: HighRTX 206020406080100SE +/- 0.15, N = 3106.04MIN: 86.34 / MAX: 136

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: HighRTX 20600.18680.37360.56040.74720.9340.83

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.65128.4159.16OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206049.0066.372.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterDiRT Rally 2.0GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

F1 2017

F1 2017 on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 2017Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: OffRTX 20604080120160200168MIN: 120 / MAX: 213

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterF1 2017Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: OffRTX 20600.33980.67961.01941.35921.6991.51

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.79111.5158.00OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterF1 2017GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206050.0063.268.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterF1 2017GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 2017Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Anti Aliasing: OffRTX 2060306090120150154MIN: 114 / MAX: 193

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterF1 2017Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Anti Aliasing: OffRTX 20600.29480.58960.88441.17921.4741.31

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.72117.7156.80OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterF1 2017GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206050.0064.169.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterF1 2017GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterF1 2017Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra High - Anti Aliasing: OffRTX 2060306090120150SE +/- 1.33, N = 3120MIN: 87 / MAX: 155

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterF1 2017Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra High - Anti Aliasing: OffRTX 20600.20480.40960.61440.81921.0240.91

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.79131.5163.57OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterF1 2017GPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206051.0066.772.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterF1 2017GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

HITMAN

This is a benchmark of HITMAN on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHITMANResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: UltraRTX 206020406080100SE +/- 0.18, N = 380.85MIN: 80.49 / MAX: 81.04

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterHITMANResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: Ultra - Total Frame TimeRTX 206020406080100Min: 3.94 / Avg: 12.42 / Max: 103.2

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.74113.1161.79OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHITMANGPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206049.0063.669.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterHITMANGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

HITMAN 2

This is a benchmark of HITMAN 2 on Steam running on Linux under Steam Play. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterHITMAN 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: UltraRTX 206020406080100SE +/- 0.28, N = 390.97MIN: 90.67 / MAX: 91.52

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterHITMAN 2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: Ultra - Total Frame TimeRTX 2060714212835Min: 4.36 / Avg: 10.93 / Max: 29.81

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.58130.7163.60OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterHITMAN 2GPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206050.0066.973.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterHITMAN 2GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Backs up old preferences (in ~/.local/share/feral-interactive/) for the run. NOTES for cross-platform comparisons: Due to the extreme demands of "Very High" 4K Texture Detail on all platforms, which can need ~6GB+ of VRAM, the "Very High" graphics preset on Linux only sets Texture Detail to "High". Nvidia ambient occlusion modes are not featured on the Linux version (HBAO+ and VXAO). See notes in install.sh for a few small tweaks including disabling the CPU governor check when testing for it's effects Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Spine Of The MountainRTX 20604080120160200SE +/- 0.15, N = 3176.2MIN: 75.6 / MAX: 328.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Prophets TombRTX 2060306090120150SE +/- 0.06, N = 3131.7MIN: 56.1 / MAX: 238.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Geothermal ValleyRTX 2060306090120150SE +/- 0.30, N = 3139.9MIN: 69.9 / MAX: 185.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Geothermal ValleyRTX 20600.27450.5490.82351.0981.37251.22

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.69115.0163.67OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206048.0063.572.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Spine Of The MountainRTX 2060306090120150SE +/- 0.41, N = 3147.5MIN: 28 / MAX: 233.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Prophets TombRTX 2060306090120150SE +/- 0.15, N = 3117.7MIN: 31.4 / MAX: 211.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Geothermal ValleyRTX 206020406080100SE +/- 0.15, N = 3109.9MIN: 68.8 / MAX: 144.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Very High - Anti Aliasing: FXAA - Scene: Geothermal ValleyRTX 20600.19130.38260.57390.76520.95650.85

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.77128.6163.85OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206050.0066.072.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterRise of the Tomb RaiderGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Backs up old preferences (in ~/.local/share/feral-interactive/) for the run. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: OffRTX 206020406080100SE +/- 0.28, N = 3102.9MAX: 171.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: OffRTX 20600.180.360.540.720.90.80

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.84129.2164.42OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206048.0066.873.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: SMAARTX 206020406080100SE +/- 0.25, N = 3102.9MAX: 192.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Anti Aliasing: SMAARTX 20600.17330.34660.51990.69320.86650.77

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.83133.5163.62OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206051.0068.174.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Highest - Anti Aliasing: OffRTX 206020406080100SE +/- 0.29, N = 384.9MAX: 158.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Highest - Anti Aliasing: OffRTX 20600.14850.2970.44550.5940.74250.66

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.70128.6163.05OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206051.0067.273.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Highest - Anti Aliasing: SMAARTX 206020406080100SE +/- 0.03, N = 385.0MAX: 163.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Highest - Anti Aliasing: SMAARTX 20600.14850.2970.44550.5940.74250.66

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.84128.5164.36OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderGPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206051.0067.173.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterShadow of the Tomb RaiderGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

Strange Brigade

This is a benchmark of Strange Brigade running under Steam Play (Proton) on Linux. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that the game is already purchased/installed. This automates the process of executing the game and using a standardized scene. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterStrange BrigadeResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: HighRTX 20604080120160200SE +/- 0.26, N = 3172.4MIN: 33 / MAX: 376.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterStrange BrigadeResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: HighRTX 20600.3690.7381.1071.4761.8451.64

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.36105.0164.14OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterStrange BrigadeGPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206050.0062.071.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterStrange BrigadeGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterStrange BrigadeResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: UltraRTX 2060306090120150SE +/- 0.44, N = 3156.7MIN: 27.8 / MAX: 369.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterStrange BrigadeResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Setting: UltraRTX 20600.3330.6660.9991.3321.6651.48

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.48106.1163.85OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterStrange BrigadeGPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206048.0061.570.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterStrange BrigadeGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

Total War: WARHAMMER II

Total War: WARHAMMER II on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Backs up old preferences (in ~/.local/share/feral-interactive/) for the run. NOTES for cross-platform comparisons: TODO Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Skaven BattleRTX 206020406080100SE +/- 0.61, N = 3102.7MIN: 5.4 / MAX: 283.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeRTX 20601428425670Min: 4.6 / Avg: 9.71 / Max: 71.4

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.73102.9164.69OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206046.0060.670.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Scenario: Skaven BattleRTX 20601632486480SE +/- 0.12, N = 371.6MIN: 11.7 / MAX: 161.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeRTX 20601122334455Min: 6.7 / Avg: 13.99 / Max: 57

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.72103.8162.60OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0GPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206047.0060.870.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

Total War: Three Kingdoms

Total War: Three Kingdoms on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Backs up old preferences (in ~/.local/share/feral-interactive/) for the run. NOTES for cross-platform comparisons: TODO Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: Three Kingdoms 1.0.1Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Battle BenchmarkRTX 206020406080100SE +/- 0.15, N = 3109.0MIN: 14.6 / MAX: 336.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: Three Kingdoms 1.0.1Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Battle Benchmark - Total Frame TimeRTX 20601326395265Min: 3 / Avg: 9.16 / Max: 64.8

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.64134.9164.91OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: Three Kingdoms 1.0.1GPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206049.0067.273.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: Three Kingdoms 1.0.1GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: Three Kingdoms 1.0.1Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Battle BenchmarkRTX 20601632486480SE +/- 0.12, N = 371.6MIN: 13 / MAX: 225

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: Three Kingdoms 1.0.1Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Battle Benchmark - Total Frame TimeRTX 20601530456075Min: 4.5 / Avg: 14.01 / Max: 77

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.81136.4163.23OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: Three Kingdoms 1.0.1GPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206053.0068.072.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: Three Kingdoms 1.0.1GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: Three Kingdoms 1.0.1Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Scenario: Battle BenchmarkRTX 20601122334455SE +/- 0.12, N = 349.8MIN: 11.4 / MAX: 207.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: Three Kingdoms 1.0.1Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Ultra - Scenario: Battle Benchmark - Total Frame TimeRTX 20601632486480Min: 5 / Avg: 20 / Max: 83.9

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.80132.6163.95OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: Three Kingdoms 1.0.1GPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206053.0067.472.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: Three Kingdoms 1.0.1GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

Dawn of War III

Dawn of War III Mad Max on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterDawn of War IIIResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Renderer: VulkanRTX 206020406080100SE +/- 0.82, N = 3105.37MIN: 81.19 / MAX: 193.81

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterDawn of War IIIResolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Renderer: VulkanRTX 20600.29480.58960.88441.17921.4741.31

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.6580.4156.01OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206048.0056.765.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterDawn of War IIIGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

X-Plane

This is a test of X-Plane, a realistic multi-platform flight simulator designed for personal computers. This is commercial closed-source software and relies upon the Steam version. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterX-Plane 11Quality: Medium - Resolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 2060306090120150132.93

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterX-Plane 11Quality: Medium - Resolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 20600.42530.85061.27591.70122.12651.89

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.4870.2101.78OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterX-Plane 11GPU Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

MinAvgMaxRTX 206044.0052.458.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterX-Plane 11GPU Temperature Monitor1632486480

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateRTX 206070140210280350SE +/- 1.32, N = 3313.88MIN: 53 / MAX: 686

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateRTX 20600.8731.7462.6193.4924.3653.88

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.6080.9124.47OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206047.0054.459.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2GPU Temperature Monitor1632486480

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 2060100200300400500SE +/- 1.32, N = 3475.12

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 20601.20152.4033.60454.8066.00755.34

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.6489.0117.29OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206048.0056.060.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12GPU Temperature Monitor1632486480

ET: Legacy

ETLegacy is an open-source engine evolution of Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory, a World War II era first person shooter that was released for free by Splash Damage using the id Tech 3 engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.75Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 206060120180240300SE +/- 3.03, N = 15270.0

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.75Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 20601.17232.34463.51694.68925.86155.21

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.5651.889.74OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.75GPU Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

MinAvgMaxRTX 206043.0047.553.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterET: Legacy 2.75GPU Temperature Monitor1530456075

Selenium

This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: MotionMark - Browser: FirefoxRTX 206060120180240300SE +/- 4.27, N = 9293.101. firefox 70.0.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: MotionMark - Browser: FirefoxRTX 206051015202519.41

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumGPU Power Consumption MonitorRTX 2060714212835Min: 9.22 / Avg: 15.1 / Max: 34.94

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumGPU Temperature MonitorRTX 2060918273645Min: 30 / Avg: 31.63 / Max: 42

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Google ChromeRTX 2060160320480640800SE +/- 3.56, N = 3755.751. chrome 78.0.3904.97

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Google ChromeRTX 206081624324033.52

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.2722.555.09OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumGPU Power Consumption Monitor1530456075

MinAvgMaxRTX 206030.0033.137.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumGPU Temperature Monitor1122334455

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: FirefoxRTX 20603K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 116.80, N = 3151141. firefox 70.0.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: FirefoxRTX 206020040060080010001026.54

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.2414.734.40OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumGPU Power Consumption Monitor1020304050

MinAvgMaxRTX 206030.0031.233.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumGPU Temperature Monitor1020304050

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google ChromeRTX 20605K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 76.93, N = 3211241. chrome 78.0.3904.97

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google ChromeRTX 206020040060080010001032.38

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.3520.546.65OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumGPU Power Consumption Monitor1428425670

MinAvgMaxRTX 206030.0032.335.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumGPU Temperature Monitor1020304050

ParaView

This test runs ParaView benchmarks: an open-source data analytics and visualization application. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 2060918273645SE +/- 0.36, N = 440.90

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 20609001800270036004500SE +/- 36.32, N = 44100.75

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 20604080120160200163.11

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.3325.1120.31OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterParaView 5.4.1GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206031.0033.038.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterParaView 5.4.1GPU Temperature Monitor1122334455

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 20604080120160200SE +/- 5.29, N = 15183.46

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 2060400800120016002000SE +/- 55.09, N = 151911.86

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 2060142842567064.31

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.3729.786.57OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterParaView 5.4.1GPU Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

MinAvgMaxRTX 206032.0034.440.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterParaView 5.4.1GPU Temperature Monitor1122334455

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 206060120180240300SE +/- 3.29, N = 15280.06

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 206010002000300040005000SE +/- 52.58, N = 154480.90

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec Per Watt, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080RTX 206050100150200250220.76

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.3520.348.43OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterParaView 5.4.1GPU Power Consumption Monitor1428425670

MinAvgMaxRTX 206033.0033.535.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterParaView 5.4.1GPU Temperature Monitor1020304050

Blender

Blender is an open-source 3D creation software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles benchmark with various sample files. GPU computing via OpenCL or CUDA is supported. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CUDARTX 20601632486480SE +/- 0.14, N = 371.38

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.33108.8128.96OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206032.0054.263.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CUDARTX 206060120180240300SE +/- 0.02, N = 3294.18

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.74112.2119.29OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206049.0063.365.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.81GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OctaneBench

OctaneBench is a test of the OctaneRender on the GPU and requires the use of NVIDIA CUDA. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterOctaneBench 4.00cTotal ScoreRTX 20604080120160200165.91

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterOctaneBench 4.00cTotal ScoreRTX 20600.2790.5580.8371.1161.3951.24

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.68133.8159.16OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterOctaneBench 4.00cGPU Power Consumption Monitor50100150200250

MinAvgMaxRTX 206051.0067.371.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterOctaneBench 4.00cGPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

IndigoBench

This is a test of Indigo Renderer's IndigoBench benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64Scene: SupercarRTX 206048121620SE +/- 0.02, N = 316.28

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s Per Watt, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64Scene: SupercarRTX 20600.05630.11260.16890.22520.28150.25

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.4266.2134.60OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206041.0051.562.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64Scene: BedroomRTX 20600.9971.9942.9913.9884.985SE +/- 0.003, N = 34.431

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s Per Watt, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64Scene: BedroomRTX 20600.01580.03160.04740.06320.0790.07

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.5066.1141.76OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206040.0049.561.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterIndigoBench 4.0.64GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

NeatBench

NeatBench is a benchmark of the cross-platform Neat Video software on the CPU and optional GPU (OpenCL / CUDA) support. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterNeatBench 5Acceleration: GPURTX 2060714212835SE +/- 0.23, N = 1528.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS Per Watt, More Is BetterNeatBench 5Acceleration: GPURTX 20600.16650.3330.49950.6660.83250.74

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.7437.985.35OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNeatBench 5GPU Power Consumption Monitor20406080100

MinAvgMaxRTX 206045.0049.053.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterNeatBench 5GPU Temperature Monitor1530456075

LuxMark

LuxMark is a multi-platform OpenGL benchmark using LuxRender. LuxMark supports targeting different OpenCL devices and has multiple scenes available for rendering. LuxMark is a fully open-source OpenCL program with real-world rendering examples. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDRRTX 20605K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 40.73, N = 321724

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Luxball HDRRTX 20604080120160200176.31

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.45123.2129.72OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterLuxMark 3.1GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206043.0063.667.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterLuxMark 3.1GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: MicrophoneRTX 20603K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 16.17, N = 313734

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: MicrophoneRTX 2060306090120150115.28

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.81119.1124.95OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterLuxMark 3.1GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206053.0064.867.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterLuxMark 3.1GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: HotelRTX 206011002200330044005500SE +/- 5.69, N = 34915

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterLuxMark 3.1OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: HotelRTX 206081624324035.46

MinAvgMaxRTX 20609.75138.6151.17OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterLuxMark 3.1GPU Power Consumption Monitor4080120160200

MinAvgMaxRTX 206052.0068.471.00OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsius, Fewer Is BetterLuxMark 3.1GPU Temperature Monitor20406080100

Meta Performance Per Watts

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watts, More Is BetterMeta Performance Per WattsPerformance Per WattsRTX 206070140210280350309.57

GPU Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsGPU Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringRTX 2060306090120150Min: 9.19 / Avg: 83.49 / Max: 164.91

GPU Temperature Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsiusGPU Temperature MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringRTX 20601428425670Min: 29 / Avg: 53.58 / Max: 74