python

Intel Core i9-7980XE testing with a ASRock X299 Taichi XE (P1.60 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB on Gentoo/Linux via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1911216-HV-PYTHON92677
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results
Show Result Confidence Charts
Allow Limiting Results To Certain Suite(s)

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Toggle/Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
LTO PGO STATIC
November 15 2019
  40 Minutes
LTO PGO
November 18 2019
  40 Minutes
LTO
November 18 2019
  40 Minutes
no SEMINTERPOS
November 20 2019
 
no SEMINTERPOS 2
November 20 2019
  42 Minutes
Invert Behavior (Only Show Selected Data)
  32 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


pythonOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i9-7980XE @ 4.40GHz (18 Cores / 36 Threads)ASRock X299 Taichi XE (P1.60 BIOS)Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers129024MB960GB INTEL SSDPED1D960GAY + 2000GB Western Digital WD20EARS-00S + 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM001-1CH1 + 3 x 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM001-1ER1 + 2000GB Western Digital WD20EARS-00M + 250GB HITACHI HTS54322eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB (135/324MHz)Realtek ALC1220Intel I219-V + Intel I211 + Intel Dual Band-AC 3168NGWGentoo/Linux5.0.17-gentoo (x86_64)X Server 1.20.5modesetting 1.20.51.1.119GCC 9.2.0 + Clang 9.0.0 + LLVM 9.0.0 + CUDA 10.1ext43840x1080ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioNetworkOSKernelDisplay ServerDisplay DriverVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionPython BenchmarksSystem Logs- NONE / noatime,rw- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- Python 3.6.9- l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT vulnerable + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling

pythoncompilebench: Compilecompilebench: Initial Createcompilebench: Read Compiled Treecython-bench: numpy: pybench: Total For Average Test TimesLTO PGO STATICLTO PGOLTOno SEMINTERPOSno SEMINTERPOS 22389549277520.95480943410502425560279521.30481223610492408558279422.994826106121222.4651346571213OpenBenchmarking.org

Compile Bench

Compilebench tries to age a filesystem by simulating some of the disk IO common in creating, compiling, patching, stating and reading kernel trees. It indirectly measures how well filesystems can maintain directory locality as the disk fills up and directories age. This current test is setup to use the makej mode with 10 initial directories Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: CompileLTO PGO STATICLTOLTO PGO5001000150020002500SE +/- 12.80, N = 3SE +/- 7.39, N = 3SE +/- 10.22, N = 3238924082425

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Initial CreateLTO PGO STATICLTOLTO PGO120240360480600SE +/- 2.49, N = 3SE +/- 1.69, N = 3SE +/- 2.43, N = 3549558560

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Read Compiled TreeLTO PGO STATICLTOLTO PGO6001200180024003000SE +/- 18.44, N = 3SE +/- 16.47, N = 3SE +/- 28.25, N = 3277527942795

Cython benchmark

Stress benchmark tests to measure time consumed by cython code Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterCython benchmark 0.27LTOno SEMINTERPOS 2LTO PGOLTO PGO STATIC612182430SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 322.9922.4621.3020.95

Numpy Benchmark

This is a test to obtain the general Numpy performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds, Fewer Is BetterNumpy Benchmarkno SEMINTERPOS 2LTOLTO PGOLTO PGO STATIC1.1M2.2M3.3M4.4M5.5M5134657482610648122364809434

PyBench

This test profile reports the total time of the different average timed test results from PyBench. PyBench reports average test times for different functions such as BuiltinFunctionCalls and NestedForLoops, with this total result providing a rough estimate as to Python's average performance on a given system. This test profile runs PyBench each time for 20 rounds. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2018-02-16Total For Average Test Timesno SEMINTERPOS 2LTOLTO PGO STATICLTO PGO30060090012001500SE +/- 3.61, N = 3SE +/- 2.65, N = 3SE +/- 1.15, N = 31213121210501049