clear-linux-intel-graphics Intel Core i7-1065G7 testing with a Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS) and Intel Iris Plus 3GB on Clear Linux OS 31340 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1910193-HU-CLEARLINU95 Core i7-1065G7 Processor: Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 34ef, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: KBG40ZPZ512G NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB, Graphics: Intel Iris Plus 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Device 34f0
OS: Clear Linux OS 31340, Kernel: 5.3.6-850.native (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 19.3.0-devel, Vulkan: 1.1.102, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191017 gcc-9-branch@277087 + Clang 9.0.0 + LLVM 9.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Environment Notes: CFFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=32 -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -malign-data=abi -fno-semantic-interposition -ftree-vectorize -ftree-loop-vectorize -Wl,-sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags" FFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=32 -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -malign-data=abi -fno-semantic-interposition -ftree-vectorize -ftree-loop-vectorize -Wl,--enable-new-dtags" CXXFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=32 -Wformat -Wformat-security -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -fno-semantic-interposition -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -Wl,-sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -mtune=skylake -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wl,--enable-new-dtags" MESA_GLSL_CACHE_DISABLE=0 CFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=32 -Wformat -Wformat-security -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -fno-semantic-interposition -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -Wl,-sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -mtune=skylake" THEANO_FLAGS="floatX=float32,openmp=true,gcc.cxxflags="-ftree-vectorize -mavx""Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performanceJava Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0-u222-ga-b00)Python Notes: Python 3.7.4Security Notes: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling
clear-linux-intel-graphics OpenBenchmarking.org Phoronix Test Suite Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads) Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS) Intel Device 34ef 16384MB KBG40ZPZ512G NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB Intel Iris Plus 3GB (1100MHz) Realtek ALC289 Intel Device 34f0 Clear Linux OS 31340 5.3.6-850.native (x86_64) GNOME Shell 3.34.1 X Server 1.20.5 modesetting 1.20.5 4.6 Mesa 19.3.0-devel 1.1.102 GCC 9.2.1 20191017 gcc-9-branch@277087 + Clang 9.0.0 + LLVM 9.0.0 ext4 1920x1080 Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL Vulkan Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Clear-linux-intel-graphics Performance System Logs - CFFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=32 -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -malign-data=abi -fno-semantic-interposition -ftree-vectorize -ftree-loop-vectorize -Wl,-sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags" FFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=32 -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -malign-data=abi -fno-semantic-interposition -ftree-vectorize -ftree-loop-vectorize -Wl,--enable-new-dtags" CXXFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=32 -Wformat -Wformat-security -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -fno-semantic-interposition -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -Wl,-sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -mtune=skylake -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wl,--enable-new-dtags" MESA_GLSL_CACHE_DISABLE=0 CFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=32 -Wformat -Wformat-security -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -fno-semantic-interposition -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -Wl,-sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -mtune=skylake" THEANO_FLAGS="floatX=float32,openmp=true,gcc.cxxflags="-ftree-vectorize -mavx"" - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0-u222-ga-b00) - Python 3.7.4 - l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling
clear-linux-intel-graphics paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080 tesseract: 1920 x 1080 xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - High xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultra xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Low xonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimate openarena: 1920 x 1080 supertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - 2 - Candela City supertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - 2 - Cocoa Temple supertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - 2 - Gran Paradiso Island supertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Ultimate - 2 - Gran Paradiso Island unigine-super: 1280 x 1024 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGL unigine-valley: 1280 x 1024 - Fullscreen - OpenGL supertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Ultimate - 2 - Candela City supertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Ultimate - 2 - Cocoa Temple paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080 selenium: MotionMark - Firefox selenium: CanvasMark - Firefox j2dbench: Vector Graphics Rendering j2dbench: Image Rendering j2dbench: All Rendering Tests j2dbench: Text Rendering Core i7-1065G7 5.61 31.60 63.21 88.03 151.10 120.78 256.84 92.15 114.27 21.13 21.51 23.13 22.12 21.03 23.78 20.73 19.68 562.58 329.29 1011.33 240.34 13451 1798545.22 2459919.87 1921285.55 18104.44 OpenBenchmarking.org
CPU Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius CPU Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Core i7-1065G7 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 28 / Avg: 59.32 / Max: 100
System Temperature Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius System Temperature Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Core i7-1065G7 20 40 60 80 100 Min: 33 / Avg: 66.42 / Max: 99
CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts CPU Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Core i7-1065G7 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 0.5 / Avg: 13.6 / Max: 30.06
System Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts System Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Core i7-1065G7 9 18 27 36 45 Min: 4.5 / Avg: 23.32 / Max: 43.7
Tesseract OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Core i7-1065G7 0.8303 1.6606 2.4909 3.3212 4.1515 3.69
Unigine Superposition OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL Core i7-1065G7 0.18 0.36 0.54 0.72 0.9 0.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Core i7-1065G7 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.78, N = 3 120.78 MIN: 62 / MAX: 240
Unigine Valley OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL Core i7-1065G7 0.207 0.414 0.621 0.828 1.035 0.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Core i7-1065G7 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 92.15 MIN: 42 / MAX: 195
SuperTuxKart This is a test of SuperTuxKart, an open-source racing game. The engine, Antarctica, is a highly modified version of Irrlicht and uses OpenGL 3.1+. Bullet is used for physics. Sound is provided by OpenAL. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Core i7-1065G7 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 21.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Core i7-1065G7 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 21.51
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Gran Paradiso Island Core i7-1065G7 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 23.13
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Gran Paradiso Island Core i7-1065G7 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.24, N = 3 22.12
Unigine Valley This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL 3 core profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL Core i7-1065G7 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 23.78
Xonotic OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low Core i7-1065G7 3 6 9 12 15 10.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Core i7-1065G7 1.3185 2.637 3.9555 5.274 6.5925 5.86
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Core i7-1065G7 1.0395 2.079 3.1185 4.158 5.1975 4.62
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Core i7-1065G7 0.7943 1.5886 2.3829 3.1772 3.9715 3.53
SuperTuxKart OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Core i7-1065G7 0.189 0.378 0.567 0.756 0.945 0.84
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Core i7-1065G7 0.1823 0.3646 0.5469 0.7292 0.9115 0.81
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 2 - Scene: Gran Paradiso Island Core i7-1065G7 0.2003 0.4006 0.6009 0.8012 1.0015 0.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Core i7-1065G7 0.1778 0.3556 0.5334 0.7112 0.889 0.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Core i7-1065G7 0.1688 0.3376 0.5064 0.6752 0.844 0.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Gran Paradiso Island Core i7-1065G7 0.1913 0.3826 0.5739 0.7652 0.9565 0.85
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Candela City Core i7-1065G7 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.15, N = 3 20.73
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 2 - Scene: Cocoa Temple Core i7-1065G7 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.29, N = 4 19.68
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Core i7-1065G7 5 10 15 20 25 22.47
OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Core i7-1065G7 6 12 18 24 30 23.52
OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Core i7-1065G7 14 28 42 56 70 62.04
Meta Performance Per Watt OpenBenchmarking.org Performance Per Watt, More Is Better Meta Performance Per Watt Performance Per Watt Core i7-1065G7 110 220 330 440 550 492.13
Selenium OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox Core i7-1065G7 200 400 600 800 1000 791.24
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Firefox Core i7-1065G7 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 3.12, N = 3 240.34 1. firefox 69.0.3
OpenBenchmarking.org Score, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox Core i7-1065G7 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 63.97, N = 3 13451 1. firefox 69.0.3
OpenBenchmarking.org Score Per Watt, More Is Better Selenium Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Firefox Core i7-1065G7 3 6 9 12 15 10.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: All Rendering Tests Core i7-1065G7 17K 34K 51K 68K 85K 77726.57
OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Vector Graphics Rendering Core i7-1065G7 16K 32K 48K 64K 80K 72777.09
OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Image Rendering Core i7-1065G7 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K 101741.87
OpenBenchmarking.org Units Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 Rendering Test: Text Rendering Core i7-1065G7 200 400 600 800 1000 815.03
Selenium Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 31.0 60.4 93.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 33.0 68.5 91.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 46.0 55.9 91.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 49.0 65.9 96.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Tesseract Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 45.0 64.9 88.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 56.0 70.3 90.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Xonotic Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 46.0 58.8 75.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 52.0 73.3 88.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 48.0 58.6 89.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 54.0 66.5 85.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 49.0 61.7 73.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 61.0 69.6 88.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 49.0 61.5 93.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 54.0 68.1 91.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenArena Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 53.0 60.2 95.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 54.0 65.6 83.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
SuperTuxKart Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 35.0 53.3 58.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 16 32 48 64 80
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 42.0 60.1 75.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 46.0 58.0 66.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 50.0 63.3 87.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 49.0 59.8 87.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 56.0 64.2 76.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 52.0 60.3 71.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 52.0 64.2 92.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 49.0 60.1 68.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 54.0 64.5 72.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 53.0 60.5 64.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 53.0 64.5 71.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ParaView Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 51.0 72.0 100.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 53.0 75.8 99.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Java 2D Microbenchmark Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 48.0 62.0 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 54.0 70.5 84.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 52.0 61.7 87.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 53.0 70.3 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 49.0 61.0 88.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 52.0 69.1 89.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 48.0 64.1 90.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 51.0 71.9 86.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Unigine Superposition Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 48.0 60.9 92.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 51.0 65.5 82.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Unigine Valley Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 50.0 59.8 80.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 CPU Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 54.0 66.3 89.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Celsius, Fewer Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 System Temperature Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
OpenArena OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time Core i7-1065G7 5 10 15 20 25 Min: 1 / Avg: 8.72 / Max: 22
Selenium Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 1.9 14.1 18.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 4.8 23.4 30.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 2.0 10.7 17.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium CPU Power Consumption Monitor 5 10 15 20 25
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 5.3 17.0 25.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Selenium System Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Tesseract Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 0.7 13.9 24.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 5.6 23.9 38.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 System Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Xonotic Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 0.8 14.9 22.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 5.7 25.4 36.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 System Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 0.8 14.9 27.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 6.1 25.8 41.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 System Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 0.7 14.9 28.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 6.0 26.2 43.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 System Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 0.7 15.0 30.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 5.9 26.1 42.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 System Power Consumption Monitor 12 24 36 48 60
OpenArena Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 2.6 15.0 24.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 5.9 25.4 37.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better OpenArena 0.8.8 System Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
SuperTuxKart Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 0.7 15.1 22.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 4.6 25.3 35.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 System Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 0.8 15.0 24.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 6.4 26.4 37.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 System Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 0.7 14.8 23.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 6.1 26.0 35.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 System Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 2.6 15.1 23.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 6.3 26.3 36.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 System Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 0.8 15.1 24.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 6.7 26.2 37.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 System Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 1.4 15.0 23.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 6.1 26.1 36.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 System Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
ParaView Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 2.3 14.2 18.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 6.1 25.0 31.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.4.1 System Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
Java 2D Microbenchmark Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 0.7 15.0 26.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 5.4 24.7 39.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 3.0 15.0 27.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 5.6 24.7 38.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 0.7 14.9 21.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 5.7 24.2 33.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 0.6 14.0 21.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 5.5 22.2 31.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
Unigine Superposition Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 0.8 14.8 23.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 8 16 24 32 40
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 5.4 26.3 37.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Unigine Valley Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 0.8 14.9 29.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
Min Avg Max Core i7-1065G7 6.2 25.7 41.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Core i7-1065G7 Processor: Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 34ef, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: KBG40ZPZ512G NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB, Graphics: Intel Iris Plus 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Device 34f0
OS: Clear Linux OS 31340, Kernel: 5.3.6-850.native (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 19.3.0-devel, Vulkan: 1.1.102, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191017 gcc-9-branch@277087 + Clang 9.0.0 + LLVM 9.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Environment Notes: CFFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=32 -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -malign-data=abi -fno-semantic-interposition -ftree-vectorize -ftree-loop-vectorize -Wl,-sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags" FFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=32 -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -malign-data=abi -fno-semantic-interposition -ftree-vectorize -ftree-loop-vectorize -Wl,--enable-new-dtags" CXXFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=32 -Wformat -Wformat-security -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -fno-semantic-interposition -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -Wl,-sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -mtune=skylake -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wl,--enable-new-dtags" MESA_GLSL_CACHE_DISABLE=0 CFLAGS="-g -O3 -feliminate-unused-debug-types -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=32 -Wformat -Wformat-security -m64 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wp,-D_REENTRANT -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns -Wl,-z -Wl,now -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -fno-semantic-interposition -ffat-lto-objects -fno-trapping-math -Wl,-sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -mtune=skylake" THEANO_FLAGS="floatX=float32,openmp=true,gcc.cxxflags="-ftree-vectorize -mavx""Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performanceJava Notes: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0-u222-ga-b00)Python Notes: Python 3.7.4Security Notes: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling
Testing initiated at 19 October 2019 12:56 by user phoronix.