mark4-1

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 testing with a HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB on openSUSE 15.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/1908208-CJCO-MERGE1994.

mark4-1ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionOpenGLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #4Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #5Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #6AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v32 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v32 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores)HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS)Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon32768MB512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640ASNVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (324/324MHz)Intel C610/X99DELL U2410Intel I218-LM + Intel I210openSUSE 15.14.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64)KDE Plasma 5.12.8X Server 1.20.3NVIDIA 390.1161.0.65GCC 7.4.0ext41920x1200NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (666/3004MHz)4.5.0AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Eight-Core @ 3.70GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (0803 BIOS)AMD 17h16384MB2000GB Force MP600AMD Vega 20 16GB (1802/1001MHz)AMD Device ab20ASUS VP28URealtek Device 8125 + Intel I211 + Intel Device 2723Ubuntu 19.045.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190811GNOME Shell 3.32.2X Server 1.20.4amdgpu 19.0.14.5 Mesa 19.0.2 (LLVM 8.0.0)GCC 8.3.03840x2160AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6-Core @ 3.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads)AMD Device 1480AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core @ 3.60GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads)Intel Core i5-9400F @ 4.10GHz (6 Cores)ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS)Intel Cannon Lake PCHRealtek ALC1220Acer B286HKIntel I219-VIntel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores)HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS)Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon32768MB512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640ASNVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (324/324MHz)Intel C610/X99DELL U2410Intel I218-LM + Intel I210openSUSE 15.14.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64)KDE Plasma 5.12.8X Server 1.20.3NVIDIA 390.1161.0.65GCC 7.4.01920x1200NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (666/3004MHz)NVIDIA 390.1294.5.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCompiler Details- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1: --build=x86_64-suse-linux --disable-libcc1 --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-plugin --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,ada,go --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --enable-linux-futex --enable-multilib --enable-offload-targets=hsa,nvptx-none=/usr/nvptx-none, --enable-ssp --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --host=x86_64-suse-linux --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch-32=x86-64 --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver --without-system-libunwind- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2: --build=x86_64-suse-linux --disable-libcc1 --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-plugin --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,ada,go --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --enable-linux-futex --enable-multilib --enable-offload-targets=hsa,nvptx-none=/usr/nvptx-none, --enable-ssp --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --host=x86_64-suse-linux --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch-32=x86-64 --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver --without-system-libunwind- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3: --build=x86_64-suse-linux --disable-libcc1 --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-plugin --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,ada,go --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --enable-linux-futex --enable-multilib --enable-offload-targets=hsa,nvptx-none=/usr/nvptx-none, --enable-ssp --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --host=x86_64-suse-linux --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch-32=x86-64 --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver --without-system-libunwind- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #4: --build=x86_64-suse-linux --disable-libcc1 --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-plugin --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,ada,go --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --enable-linux-futex --enable-multilib --enable-offload-targets=hsa,nvptx-none=/usr/nvptx-none, --enable-ssp --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --host=x86_64-suse-linux --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch-32=x86-64 --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver --without-system-libunwind- AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v- AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v- AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v- Intel Core i5 9400F: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v- Intel Core i9 9900K: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v3: --build=x86_64-suse-linux --disable-libcc1 --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-plugin --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,ada,go --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --enable-linux-futex --enable-multilib --enable-offload-targets=hsa,nvptx-none=/usr/nvptx-none, --enable-ssp --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --host=x86_64-suse-linux --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch-32=x86-64 --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver --without-system-libunwind- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: --build=x86_64-suse-linux --disable-libcc1 --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-plugin --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,ada,go --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --enable-linux-futex --enable-multilib --enable-offload-targets=hsa,nvptx-none=/usr/nvptx-none, --enable-ssp --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --host=x86_64-suse-linux --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch-32=x86-64 --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver --without-system-libunwindProcessor Details- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #4: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #5: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #6: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- Intel Core i5 9400F: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- Intel Core i9 9900K: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v3: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveOpenCL Details- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1, Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3, Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #6, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v3, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: GPU Compute Cores: 2304Security Details- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB filling- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB filling- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB filling- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #4: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB filling- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #5: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB filling- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #6: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB filling- AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional STIBP: disabled RSB filling- AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling- AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling- Intel Core i5 9400F: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: disabled RSB filling- Intel Core i9 9900K: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v3: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB filling- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB fillingDisk Details- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2: DEADLINE / data=ordered,relatime,rwPython Details- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2: Python 2.7.14 + Python 3.6.5- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3: Python 2.7.14 + Python 3.6.5- AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- Intel Core i5 9400F: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- Intel Core i9 9900K: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v3: Python 2.7.14 + Python 3.6.5- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: Python 2.7.14 + Python 3.6.5Graphics Details- AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, AMD Ryzen 5 3600X, AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, Intel Core i5 9400F, Intel Core i9 9900K: GLAMOR

mark4-1rodinia: OpenMP LavaMDrodinia: OpenMP CFD Solvernamd: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atomsx264: H.264 Video Encodingx265: H.265 1080p Video Encodingcompress-7zip: Compress Speed Teststockfish: Total Timeasmfish: 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depthbuild-gcc: Time To Compilebuild-linux-kernel: Time To Compileradiance: Serialradiance: SMP Parallelopenssl: RSA 4096-bit Performancectx-clock: Context Switch Timesysbench: CPUsqlite: Timed SQLite Insertionsfio: Rand Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 2MB - Default Test Directoryfio: Rand Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Rand Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Rand Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 2MB - Default Test Directoryfio: Rand Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Rand Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 2MB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 2MB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Sizefs-mark: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threadsfs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Sizefs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSyncdbench: 12 Clientsdbench: 1 Clientscompilebench: Compilecompilebench: Initial Createcompilebench: Read Compiled Treepostmark: Disk Transaction Performanceparboil: OpenMP CUTCPttsiod-renderer: Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mappingsvt-hevc: 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encodesvt-vp9: 1080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video Encodegraphics-magick: Resizingswet: Averagebuild-llvm: Time To Compilec-ray: Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixelcompress-pbzip2: 256MB File Compressionprimesieve: 1e12 Prime Number Generationsmallpt: Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samplessysbench: Memoryunigine-heaven: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - OpenGLunigine-sanctuary: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreenunigine-super: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGLunigine-super: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - High - OpenGLunigine-super: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - Ultra - OpenGLunigine-super: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGLunigine-tropics: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - OpenGLblender: BMW27 - CUDAblender: BMW27 - OpenCLblender: BMW27 - CPU-Onlyblender: Classroom - CUDAblender: Fishy Cat - CUDAblender: Barbershop - CUDAblender: Classroom - OpenCLblender: Fishy Cat - OpenCLblender: Barbershop - OpenCLblender: Classroom - CPU-Onlyblender: Fishy Cat - CPU-Onlyblender: Barbershop - CPU-Onlyblender: Pabellon Barcelona - CUDAblender: Pabellon Barcelona - OpenCLblender: Pabellon Barcelona - CPU-Onlytesseract: 3840 x 2160xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimatesupertuxkart: 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen - Ultimate - 6 - Candela Citydarktable: Boat - CPU-onlydarktable: Masskrug - CPU-onlydarktable: Server Room - CPU-onlygimp: unsharp-maskgimp: resizegimp: rotategimp: auto-levelsappleseed: Emilyappleseed: Disney Materialappleseed: Material Testercoremark: CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Secondselenium: ARES-6 - Firefoxselenium: ARES-6 - Google Chromeselenium: Octane - Firefoxselenium: Octane - Google Chromeselenium: Jetstream - Firefoxselenium: Jetstream - Google Chrometjbench: Decompression Throughputjohn-the-ripper: Blowfishgromacs: Water Benchmarkcp2k: Fayalite-FIST Datasvt-av1: 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encodevpxenc: vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encodedav1d: Summer Nature 1080pdav1d: Summer Nature 4Kcompress-zstd: Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19compress-xz: Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9pybench: Total For Average Test Timesgo-benchmark: buildgo-benchmark: httpgo-benchmark: jsongo-benchmark: garbagerust-mandel: Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrottensorflow: Cifar10tungsten: Hairtungsten: Water Caustictungsten: Non-Exponentialtungsten: Volumetric Causticdarktable: Boat - CPU-onlydarktable: Masskrug - CPU-onlydarktable: Server Room - CPU-onlygimp: unsharp-maskgimp: resizegimp: rotategimp: auto-levelsZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #4Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #5Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #6AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v32 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v359.6220.851.3985291.1010.86611093138274733462707836.1762.28936.89280.142425.57117815609.49109.312157644164733149540310300016968432158001500769196833104.57207.88102.031734.40292.6257.531582.73402.191975.7548703.56402.20148.8352.72208642066116333.9865.373.7017.9010.434056583.3149.66212.0170.27247.8032.93168.4358.04378.74382.81149.24453.841041.57778.78451.601008.60772.95408.75229.87635.721099.971100.01525.9061.7421.871.4005310.8160400313519293365465662.3115595.182.2988078.6130.27233290572420543076.09149473195775342.9629423472.9912.496.234.1217.648.6613.2615.36422.69242.13225.6026906359.7323.273287442670197195181179190.7253025.9813511.7834.2828.9439.4211051600118962857976529598137698645.8236.1227.6630.899.2611.752.7046976.9038.88204533162156459572.04156412212849371.3736928973.3811.106.094.3715.257.8211.8813.43481.78309.83272.9727973951.5719.463710849221223222219145990.6632226.0914110.5830.7127.2538.839591359043924565687583507156399344.7927.5732.5830.5811.6813.492.0693592.9443.48263254992821989258.16193334163655368.7737729373.6011.415.343.8715.817.5211.8013.61378.97238.12213.6637143050.9419.213698049499225224220195950.7631835.401369.7926.0822.3431.519411375033899752165816657117326540.7025.9324.9126.788.3010.261.45296139.2552.24375671273934538141.87248244114460376.1937329273.5411.174.543.5717.167.4911.8014.34271.99168.73162.5253193351.5019.253786250093226224227282910.9832646.041798.0421.8717.9625.49919137868863434911406423285980836.1521.8817.5323.986.887.522.7136458.2933.581407143015284406112.171206293071283279.0428824073.7213.197.665.3515.628.2413.1314.07774.80406.82421.1018648451.7919.95350344549420521420097720.7478022.4612812.6842.6128.7945.859541282585645279168114011205660776.4233.5452.8339.3715.5119.241.7557794.5344.94251728232804673965.98192370172675353.5135428874.3813.785.394.2015.026.7711.1412.67421.19245.34232.0739468151.2123.293978645482231208240166780.8463835.211917.6826.5624.2028.468011101544574743535738127115156444.0423.8628.0325.057.7110.001.3980790.5510.89315643513404686162.3515634914661029322545.9538694970.1125.082574234657154169155200601.25251231.3417517.0824.1316261992946253665144447534144699058.7824.0130.4714.6311.788.046.093.8645.669.6223.3822.80OpenBenchmarking.org

Rodinia

Test: OpenMP LavaMD

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 2.4Test: OpenMP LavaMDZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #21428425670SE +/- 0.26, N = 3SE +/- 0.76, N = 359.6261.741. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL

Rodinia

Test: OpenMP CFD Solver

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 2.4Test: OpenMP CFD SolverZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2510152025SE +/- 0.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 1520.8521.871. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL

NAMD

ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms

OpenBenchmarking.orgdays/ns, Fewer Is BetterNAMD 2.13b1ATPase Simulation - 327,506 AtomsZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v30.61061.22121.83182.44243.053SE +/- 0.00337, N = 3SE +/- 0.00173, N = 3SE +/- 0.00116, N = 8SE +/- 0.00123, N = 11SE +/- 0.00078, N = 7SE +/- 0.00477, N = 3SE +/- 0.00742, N = 3SE +/- 0.00394, N = 3SE +/- 0.00182, N = 31.398521.400532.298802.704692.069351.452962.713641.755771.39807

x264

H.264 Video Encoding

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2018-09-25H.264 Video EncodingZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3306090120150SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.70, N = 3SE +/- 0.76, N = 3SE +/- 0.90, N = 3SE +/- 1.89, N = 3SE +/- 0.92, N = 3SE +/- 0.82, N = 3SE +/- 0.60, N = 391.1078.6176.9092.94139.2558.2994.5390.551. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -ffast-math -std=gnu99 -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-vectorize

x265

H.265 1080p Video Encoding

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx265 3.0H.265 1080p Video EncodingZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31224364860SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 310.8610.8130.2738.8843.4852.2433.5844.9410.89-lnuma-lnuma1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl

7-Zip Compression

Compress Speed Test

OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 16.02Compress Speed TestZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #213K26K39K52K65KSE +/- 435.68, N = 3SE +/- 275.37, N = 361109604001. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -lpthread

Stockfish

Total Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterStockfish 9Total TimeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v38M16M24M32M40MSE +/- 135172.55, N = 3SE +/- 417821.87, N = 4SE +/- 47780.58, N = 3SE +/- 160816.35, N = 3SE +/- 159059.56, N = 3SE +/- 31926.05, N = 3SE +/- 83551.49, N = 3SE +/- 158667.61, N = 3SE +/- 79600.42, N = 33138274731351929233290572045331626325499375671271407143025172823315643511. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++11 -pedantic -O3 -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -flto

asmFish

1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes/second, More Is BetterasmFish 2018-07-231024 Hash Memory, 26 DepthZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v38M16M24M32M40MSE +/- 272766.83, N = 3SE +/- 445113.17, N = 3SE +/- 59405.65, N = 3SE +/- 255715.94, N = 3SE +/- 247680.63, N = 3SE +/- 358905.13, N = 3SE +/- 192896.54, N = 5SE +/- 242476.95, N = 3SE +/- 515708.70, N = 3334627073365465624205430215645952821989239345381152844062804673934046861

Timed GCC Compilation

Time To Compile

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed GCC Compilation 8.2Time To CompileZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000836.17

Timed Linux Kernel Compilation

Time To Compile

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18Time To CompileZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3306090120150SE +/- 0.86, N = 3SE +/- 0.83, N = 3SE +/- 0.84, N = 3SE +/- 0.65, N = 3SE +/- 0.71, N = 3SE +/- 0.62, N = 4SE +/- 0.91, N = 3SE +/- 0.80, N = 3SE +/- 0.85, N = 362.2862.3176.0972.0458.1641.87112.1765.9862.35

Radiance Benchmark

Test: Serial

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRadiance Benchmark 5.0Test: SerialZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000936.89

Radiance Benchmark

Test: SMP Parallel

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRadiance Benchmark 5.0Test: SMP ParallelZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #160120180240300280.14

OpenSSL

RSA 4096-bit Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgSigns Per Second, More Is BetterOpenSSL 1.1.1RSA 4096-bit PerformanceZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #15001000150020002500SE +/- 2.46, N = 32425.571. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

ctx_clock

Context Switch Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgClocks, Fewer Is Betterctx_clockContext Switch TimeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #130060090012001500SE +/- 1.67, N = 31178

Sysbench

Test: CPU

OpenBenchmarking.orgEvents Per Second, More Is BetterSysbench 2018-07-28Test: CPUZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #23K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 10.52, N = 3SE +/- 4.32, N = 315609.4915595.181. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -O3 -funroll-loops -ggdb3 -march=haswell -rdynamic -ldl -laio -lm

SQLite

Timed SQLite Insertions

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.22Timed SQLite InsertionsZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #120406080100SE +/- 0.17, N = 3109.311. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lz -ldl -lpthread

Flexible IO Tester

Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1500100015002000250021571. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

Flexible IO Tester

Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1140280420560700SE +/- 10.74, N = 156441. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

Flexible IO Tester

Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #140K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 2743.77, N = 151647331. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

Flexible IO Tester

Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #130060090012001500SE +/- 3.21, N = 314951. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

Flexible IO Tester

Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1901802703604504031. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

Flexible IO Tester

Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #120K40K60K80K100K1030001. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

Flexible IO Tester

Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1400800120016002000SE +/- 0.33, N = 316961. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

Flexible IO Tester

Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000SE +/- 39.12, N = 158431. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

Flexible IO Tester

Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #150K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 10025.78, N = 152158001. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

Flexible IO Tester

Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #130060090012001500SE +/- 3.18, N = 315001. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

Flexible IO Tester

Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1170340510680850SE +/- 24.05, N = 127691. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

Flexible IO Tester

Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #140K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 6138.35, N = 121968331. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

FS-Mark

Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB SizeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #120406080100SE +/- 0.84, N = 3104.571. (CC) gcc options: -static

FS-Mark

Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 ThreadsZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #150100150200250SE +/- 6.74, N = 15207.881. (CC) gcc options: -static

FS-Mark

Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB SizeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #120406080100SE +/- 0.32, N = 3102.031. (CC) gcc options: -static

FS-Mark

Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSyncZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1400800120016002000SE +/- 2.31, N = 31734.401. (CC) gcc options: -static

Dbench

12 Clients

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.012 ClientsZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #160120180240300SE +/- 0.78, N = 3292.621. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2

Dbench

1 Clients

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.01 ClientsZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #11326395265SE +/- 0.08, N = 357.531. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2

Compile Bench

Test: Compile

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: CompileZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #130060090012001500SE +/- 19.55, N = 31582.73

Compile Bench

Test: Initial Create

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Initial CreateZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #190180270360450SE +/- 4.63, N = 3402.19

Compile Bench

Test: Read Compiled Tree

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Read Compiled TreeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1400800120016002000SE +/- 42.24, N = 31975.75

PostMark

Disk Transaction Performance

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostMark 1.51Disk Transaction PerformanceZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #110002000300040005000SE +/- 31.33, N = 348701. (CC) gcc options: -O3

Parboil

Test: OpenMP CUTCP

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterParboil 2.5Test: OpenMP CUTCPZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #10.8011.6022.4033.2044.005SE +/- 0.01, N = 33.561. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp

TTSIOD 3D Renderer

Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping

OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterTTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3bPhong Rendering With Soft-Shadow MappingZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #190180270360450SE +/- 2.43, N = 3402.201. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -mtune=native -flto -msse -mrecip -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -mssse3 -lSDL -lpthread -fopenmp -fwhole-program -lstdc++

SVT-HEVC

1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 2019-02-031080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video EncodeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v350100150200250SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 1.43, N = 3SE +/- 1.16, N = 3SE +/- 1.68, N = 3SE +/- 2.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.66, N = 3SE +/- 0.66, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3148.83149.00156.00193.00248.00120.00192.00156.001. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O2 -flto -fvisibility=hidden -march=native -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt

SVT-VP9

1080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video Encode

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 2019-02-171080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video EncodeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #11224364860SE +/- 0.06, N = 352.721. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O2 -flto -fvisibility=hidden -mavx -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm

GraphicsMagick

Operation: Resizing

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.30Operation: ResizingZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #150100150200250SE +/- 0.58, N = 32081. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -pthread -ltiff -lfreetype -ljpeg -lpng16 -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread

Swet

Average

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterSwet 1.5.16AverageZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1140M280M420M560M700MSE +/- 2422102.64, N = 36420661161. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -lncurses -lrt

Timed LLVM Compilation

Time To Compile

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1Time To CompileZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3140280420560700333.98473.00412.00334.00244.00629.00370.00349.00

C-Ray

Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterC-Ray 1.1Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per PixelZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #11530456075SE +/- 0.03, N = 365.371. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3

Parallel BZIP2 Compression

256MB File Compression

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterParallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12256MB File CompressionZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #10.83251.6652.49753.334.1625SE +/- 0.04, N = 33.701. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -pthread -lbz2 -lpthread

Primesieve

1e12 Prime Number Generation

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPrimesieve 7.41e12 Prime Number GenerationZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #148121620SE +/- 0.02, N = 317.901. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lpthread

Smallpt

Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSmallpt 1.0Global Illumination Renderer; 128 SamplesZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #13691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 310.431. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -O3

Sysbench

Test: Memory

OpenBenchmarking.orgEvents Per Second, More Is BetterSysbench 2018-07-28Test: MemoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1900K1800K2700K3600K4500KSE +/- 8789.90, N = 34056583.311. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -O3 -funroll-loops -ggdb3 -march=haswell -rdynamic -ldl -laio -lm

Unigine Heaven

Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #11122334455SE +/- 0.37, N = 349.66

Unigine Sanctuary

Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Sanctuary 2.3Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: FullscreenZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #150100150200250SE +/- 0.62, N = 3212.01

Unigine Superposition

Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #11632486480SE +/- 0.03, N = 370.27MAX: 93

Unigine Superposition

Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGL

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #161218243024MAX: 29.2

Unigine Superposition

Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Ultra - Renderer: OpenGL

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Ultra - Renderer: OpenGLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1246810SE +/- 0.00, N = 37.80MAX: 8.6

Unigine Superposition

Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGL

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1816243240SE +/- 0.03, N = 332.93MAX: 42.7

Unigine Tropics

Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Tropics 1.3Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: FullscreenZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #14080120160200SE +/- 0.02, N = 3168.43

Unigine Valley

Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #11326395265SE +/- 0.04, N = 358.04

Blender

Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CUDA

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CUDAZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #180160240320400SE +/- 3.55, N = 3378.74

Blender

Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: OpenCL

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: OpenCLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #180160240320400SE +/- 0.97, N = 3382.81

Blender

Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-OnlyZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v370140210280350SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.52, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.60, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3149.24195.00212.00163.00114.00307.00172.00146.00

Blender

Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CUDA

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CUDAZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1100200300400500SE +/- 0.53, N = 3453.84

Blender

Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CUDA

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CUDAZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000SE +/- 5.04, N = 31041.57

Blender

Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CUDA

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CUDAZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000SE +/- 3.19, N = 3778.78

Blender

Blend File: Classroom - Compute: OpenCL

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Classroom - Compute: OpenCLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1100200300400500SE +/- 1.09, N = 3451.60

Blender

Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: OpenCL

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: OpenCLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000SE +/- 6.70, N = 31008.60

Blender

Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: OpenCL

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: OpenCLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1170340510680850SE +/- 4.16, N = 3772.95

Blender

Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-OnlyZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #190180270360450SE +/- 0.44, N = 3408.75

Blender

Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-OnlyZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #150100150200250SE +/- 0.10, N = 3229.87

Blender

Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-OnlyZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v330060090012001500SE +/- 0.68, N = 3SE +/- 1.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 0.52, N = 3SE +/- 1.05, N = 3SE +/- 2.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.73, N = 3SE +/- 1.01, N = 3635.72775.00849.00655.00460.001283.00675.00610.00

Blender

Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CUDA

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CUDAZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000SE +/- 1.43, N = 31099.97

Blender

Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: OpenCL

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: OpenCLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000SE +/- 0.40, N = 31100.01

Blender

Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-OnlyZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1110220330440550SE +/- 0.56, N = 3525.90

Tesseract

Resolution: 3840 x 2160

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K80160240320400SE +/- 3.65, N = 3SE +/- 1.96, N = 3SE +/- 4.61, N = 3SE +/- 2.47, N = 3SE +/- 3.56, N = 3SE +/- 10.89, N = 15342.96371.37368.77376.19279.04353.51

Xonotic

Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v380160240320400SE +/- 1.94, N = 3SE +/- 1.01, N = 3SE +/- 1.27, N = 3SE +/- 2.34, N = 3SE +/- 3.21, N = 3SE +/- 1.10, N = 3SE +/- 1.09, N = 3294369377373288354293MIN: 147 / MAX: 684MIN: 183 / MAX: 807MIN: 177 / MAX: 839MIN: 161 / MAX: 815MIN: 126 / MAX: 719MIN: 138 / MAX: 829MIN: 146 / MAX: 638

Xonotic

Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v360120180240300SE +/- 0.92, N = 3SE +/- 0.46, N = 3SE +/- 0.83, N = 3SE +/- 1.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.86, N = 3SE +/- 0.89, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3234289293292240288225MIN: 40 / MAX: 621MIN: 52 / MAX: 647MIN: 52 / MAX: 652MIN: 53 / MAX: 654MIN: 49 / MAX: 632MIN: 50 / MAX: 654MIN: 35 / MAX: 473

SuperTuxKart

Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela CityAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v320406080100SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 1.94, N = 1572.9973.3873.6073.5473.7274.3845.95

Darktable

Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-onlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K48121620SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 4SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 312.4911.1011.4111.1713.1913.78

Darktable

Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-onlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K246810SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 36.236.095.344.547.665.39

Darktable

Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-onlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K1.20382.40763.61144.81526.019SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 5SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 5SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 34.124.373.873.575.354.20

GIMP

Test: unsharp-mask

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Test: unsharp-maskAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K48121620SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 317.6415.2515.8117.1615.6215.02

GIMP

Test: resize

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Test: resizeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K246810SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 38.667.827.527.498.246.77

GIMP

Test: rotate

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Test: rotateAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 13SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 313.2611.8811.8011.8013.1311.14

GIMP

Test: auto-levels

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Test: auto-levelsAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K48121620SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 315.3613.4313.6114.3414.0712.67

Appleseed

Scene: Emily

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaScene: EmilyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2004006008001000422.69481.78378.97271.99774.80421.19

Appleseed

Scene: Disney Material

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaScene: Disney MaterialAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K90180270360450242.13309.83238.12168.73406.82245.34

Appleseed

Scene: Material Tester

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaScene: Material TesterAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K90180270360450225.60272.97213.66162.52421.10232.07

Coremark

CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations/Sec, More Is BetterCoremark 1.0CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per SecondAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3110K220K330K440K550KSE +/- 2700.80, N = 3SE +/- 578.99, N = 3SE +/- 2122.46, N = 3SE +/- 5555.00, N = 3SE +/- 691.75, N = 3SE +/- 5211.05, N = 3SE +/- 4432.83, N = 32690632797393714305319331864843946813869491. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt

Selenium

Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31632486480SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 359.7351.5750.9451.5051.7951.2170.111. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: firefox 68.0.12. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: firefox 68.0.13. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: firefox 68.0.14. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: firefox 68.0.15. Intel Core i5 9400F: firefox 68.0.26. Intel Core i9 9900K: firefox 68.0.27. 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: firefox 68.0.1

Selenium

Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3612182430SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 323.2719.4619.2119.2519.9523.2925.081. chrome 76.0.3809.100

Selenium

Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Octane - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v39K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 255.26, N = 3SE +/- 123.50, N = 3SE +/- 154.49, N = 3SE +/- 388.71, N = 3SE +/- 143.80, N = 3SE +/- 143.36, N = 3SE +/- 65.97, N = 3328743710836980378623503439786257421. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: firefox 68.0.12. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: firefox 68.0.13. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: firefox 68.0.14. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: firefox 68.0.15. Intel Core i5 9400F: firefox 68.0.26. Intel Core i9 9900K: firefox 68.0.27. 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: firefox 68.0.1

Selenium

Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google Chrome

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Octane - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v311K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 99.65, N = 3SE +/- 219.19, N = 3SE +/- 58.30, N = 3SE +/- 213.82, N = 3SE +/- 111.06, N = 3SE +/- 39.48, N = 3SE +/- 66.06, N = 3426704922149499500934549445482346571. chrome 76.0.3809.100

Selenium

Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Firefox

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v350100150200250SE +/- 0.46, N = 3SE +/- 0.70, N = 3SE +/- 0.74, N = 3SE +/- 0.43, N = 3SE +/- 0.37, N = 3SE +/- 0.65, N = 3SE +/- 0.78, N = 31972232252262052311541. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: firefox 68.0.12. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: firefox 68.0.13. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: firefox 68.0.14. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: firefox 68.0.15. Intel Core i5 9400F: firefox 68.0.26. Intel Core i9 9900K: firefox 68.0.27. 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: firefox 68.0.1

Selenium

Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google Chrome

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v350100150200250SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 1.68, N = 3SE +/- 1.13, N = 3SE +/- 2.46, N = 3SE +/- 1.99, N = 3SE +/- 1.70, N = 3SE +/- 0.43, N = 31952222242242142081691. chrome 76.0.3809.100

libjpeg-turbo tjbench

Test: Decompression Throughput

OpenBenchmarking.orgMegapixels/sec, More Is Betterlibjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2Test: Decompression ThroughputAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v350100150200250SE +/- 0.34, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.66, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.88, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 1.19, N = 3181219220227200240155-lm1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -rdynamic

John The Ripper

Test: Blowfish

OpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1Test: BlowfishAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v36K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 23.46, N = 3SE +/- 5.51, N = 3SE +/- 19.85, N = 3SE +/- 50.00, N = 3SE +/- 2.00, N = 3SE +/- 30.46, N = 3SE +/- 34.86, N = 31791914599195952829197721667820060-lgmp-lgmp-lgmp-lgmp1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -pthread -lm -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2

GROMACS

Water Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Day, More Is BetterGROMACS 2018.3Water BenchmarkAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v30.28130.56260.84391.12521.4065SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 30.720.660.760.980.740.841.251. (CXX) g++ options: -march=core-avx2 -std=c++11 -O3 -funroll-all-loops -fopenmp -lrt -lpthread -lm

CP2K Molecular Dynamics

Fayalite-FIST Data

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterCP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1Fayalite-FIST DataAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v350010001500200025005303223183267806382512

SVT-AV1

1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.51080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31020304050SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 325.9826.0935.4046.0422.4635.2131.341. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pie -lpthread -lm

VP9 libvpx Encoding

vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterVP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0vpxenc VP9 1080p Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v34080120160200SE +/- 1.90, N = 3SE +/- 2.95, N = 12SE +/- 1.53, N = 6SE +/- 1.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.48, N = 3SE +/- 0.93, N = 3SE +/- 1.01, N = 31351411361791281911751. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -fPIC -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -std=c++11

dav1d

Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterdav1d 0.3Video Input: Summer Nature 1080pAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3691215SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 311.7810.589.798.0412.687.681. (CC) gcc options: -pthread

dav1d

Video Input: Summer Nature 4K

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterdav1d 0.3Video Input: Summer Nature 4KAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K1020304050SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 334.2830.7126.0821.8742.6126.561. (CC) gcc options: -pthread

Zstd Compression

Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterZstd Compression 1.3.4Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3714212835SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 1528.9427.2522.3417.9628.7924.2017.08-llzma-llzma1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz

XZ Compression

Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterXZ Compression 5.2.4Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31020304050SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 339.4238.8331.5125.4945.8528.4624.131. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -O2

PyBench

Total For Average Test Times

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2018-02-16Total For Average Test TimesAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v330060090012001500SE +/- 2.96, N = 3SE +/- 5.69, N = 3SE +/- 3.67, N = 3SE +/- 4.98, N = 3SE +/- 0.88, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 2.60, N = 311059599419199548011626

Go Benchmarks

Test: build

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: buildAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v34000M8000M12000M16000M20000MSE +/- 208994255.42, N = 3SE +/- 164685684.20, N = 3SE +/- 152619770.85, N = 3SE +/- 154588275.99, N = 3SE +/- 116621421.09, N = 3SE +/- 118424227.34, N = 7SE +/- 56467190.13, N = 316001189628135904392451375033899713786886343128258564521101544574719929462536

Go Benchmarks

Test: http

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: httpAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 2.40, N = 3SE +/- 1.76, N = 3SE +/- 20.17, N = 3SE +/- 52.17, N = 3SE +/- 2.08, N = 3SE +/- 6.49, N = 35797656852164911791643536514

Go Benchmarks

Test: json

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: jsonAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v32M4M6M8M10MSE +/- 16902.96, N = 3SE +/- 15662.60, N = 3SE +/- 18947.61, N = 3SE +/- 8942.16, N = 3SE +/- 7995.80, N = 3SE +/- 8436.42, N = 3SE +/- 6165.43, N = 36529598758350758166574064232811401157381274447534

Go Benchmarks

Test: garbage

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: garbageAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 1839.52, N = 3SE +/- 2347.95, N = 3SE +/- 2870.38, N = 3SE +/- 984.87, N = 3SE +/- 6125.38, N = 3SE +/- 617.39, N = 3SE +/- 4618.94, N = 3137698615639931173265859808205660711515641446990

Rust Mandelbrot

Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRust MandelbrotTime To Complete Serial/Parallel MandelbrotAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v320406080100SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 345.8244.7940.7036.1576.4244.0458.781. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -pie -nodefaultlibs -lutil -ldl -lrt -lpthread -lgcc_s -lc -lm

Tensorflow

Build: Cifar10

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTensorflow 2017-02-03Build: Cifar10AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K816243240SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 336.1227.5725.9321.8833.5423.86

Tungsten Renderer

Scene: Hair

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Scene: HairAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31224364860SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 327.6632.5824.9117.5352.8328.0324.01-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=haswell -mno-sse4a -ljpeg1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -ldl

Tungsten Renderer

Scene: Water Caustic

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Scene: Water CausticAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3918273645SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 330.8930.5826.7823.9839.3725.0530.47-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=haswell -mno-sse4a -ljpeg1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -ldl

Tungsten Renderer

Scene: Non-Exponential

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Scene: Non-ExponentialAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v348121620SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 15SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 39.2611.688.306.8815.517.7114.63-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=haswell -mno-sse4a -ljpeg1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -ldl

Tungsten Renderer

Scene: Volumetric Caustic

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Scene: Volumetric CausticAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3510152025SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 311.7513.4910.267.5219.2410.0011.78-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=haswell -mno-sse4a -ljpeg1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -ldl

Tesseract

Resolution: 3840 x 2160

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.360.721.081.441.81.281.301.301.201.601.52

Tesseract

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70140210280350Min: 82.7 / Avg: 267.83 / Max: 320.6Min: 72.2 / Avg: 285.99 / Max: 347.2Min: 72.7 / Avg: 282.91 / Max: 345.6Min: 74.2 / Avg: 313.92 / Max: 390Min: 49.3 / Avg: 173.98 / Max: 265.2Min: 45 / Avg: 232.12 / Max: 363.4

Xonotic

Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.5491.0981.6472.1962.7451.741.792.011.762.292.44

Xonotic

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70140210280350Min: 78.5 / Avg: 169.41 / Max: 225.1Min: 77.1 / Avg: 206.06 / Max: 379.2Min: 78.2 / Avg: 187.98 / Max: 312.1Min: 82 / Avg: 212.56 / Max: 308Min: 53.5 / Avg: 125.84 / Max: 258.3Min: 49.4 / Avg: 145.12 / Max: 229.5

Xonotic

Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.40730.81461.22191.62922.03651.211.211.351.251.811.53

Xonotic

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70140210280350Min: 77.3 / Avg: 192.95 / Max: 346.6Min: 78.6 / Avg: 238.64 / Max: 370.3Min: 77.6 / Avg: 217.25 / Max: 401.6Min: 80.8 / Avg: 233.68 / Max: 392Min: 53.4 / Avg: 132.63 / Max: 216.6Min: 48.6 / Avg: 188.21 / Max: 313.5

SuperTuxKart

Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela CityAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.05630.11260.16890.22520.28150.210.210.210.210.250.24

SuperTuxKart

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70140210280350Min: 74.6 / Avg: 350.01 / Max: 402.8Min: 76.6 / Avg: 342.64 / Max: 391.8Min: 75.6 / Avg: 344.42 / Max: 394Min: 80.3 / Avg: 353.6 / Max: 411Min: 54 / Avg: 292.02 / Max: 341.7Min: 49.3 / Avg: 304.48 / Max: 352.5

Blender

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74.1 / Avg: 221.59 / Max: 229.7Min: 76.5 / Avg: 163.75 / Max: 170.9Min: 79.2 / Avg: 168.72 / Max: 177Min: 79.6 / Avg: 232.92 / Max: 247.7Min: 48.6 / Avg: 105.52 / Max: 109.7Min: 49.7 / Avg: 139.24 / Max: 148.5

Blender

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74 / Avg: 215.17 / Max: 221.6Min: 74.3 / Avg: 160.02 / Max: 162.8Min: 75 / Avg: 170.99 / Max: 175.6Min: 78.9 / Avg: 237.97 / Max: 245.4Min: 48.6 / Avg: 105.08 / Max: 106.6Min: 45.7 / Avg: 140.74 / Max: 150.2

Darktable

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 73.4 / Avg: 128.79 / Max: 150.4Min: 73.7 / Avg: 125.48 / Max: 151Min: 78.9 / Avg: 152.02 / Max: 191Min: 48.4 / Avg: 81.38 / Max: 102.6Min: 45.5 / Avg: 109.84 / Max: 149.4

Darktable

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 9 3900X4080120160200Min: 72.1 / Avg: 106.08 / Max: 152.3Min: 76.9 / Avg: 125.28 / Max: 198.5

GIMP

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 72 / Avg: 117.96 / Max: 142.5Min: 72.9 / Avg: 103.78 / Max: 117Min: 74.1 / Avg: 114.8 / Max: 123.3Min: 76.9 / Avg: 128.83 / Max: 150.6Min: 48.1 / Avg: 66.8 / Max: 74.6Min: 44.3 / Avg: 83.9 / Max: 111.7

GIMP

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20406080100Min: 71.8 / Avg: 94.9 / Max: 104.8Min: 74.6 / Avg: 94.53 / Max: 106.1Min: 76 / Avg: 106.93 / Max: 123.4Min: 47.5 / Avg: 58.49 / Max: 61.8Min: 45 / Avg: 65.06 / Max: 76.4

GIMP

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 73.2 / Avg: 95.99 / Max: 112.5Min: 73.2 / Avg: 104.75 / Max: 119.7Min: 80.4 / Avg: 128.4 / Max: 143.1Min: 48.1 / Avg: 60.43 / Max: 71.7Min: 44.5 / Avg: 79.42 / Max: 109.2

Appleseed

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 72.8 / Avg: 218.01 / Max: 227.5Min: 73.3 / Avg: 162.23 / Max: 167.3Min: 74.6 / Avg: 168.52 / Max: 174.1Min: 75.6 / Avg: 232.25 / Max: 242.7Min: 48.1 / Avg: 101.5 / Max: 103.6Min: 45.5 / Avg: 140.89 / Max: 151.2

Appleseed

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 76.6 / Avg: 224.28 / Max: 232Min: 74.2 / Avg: 165.41 / Max: 169.1Min: 73.9 / Avg: 168.41 / Max: 170.7Min: 78.3 / Avg: 233.98 / Max: 241.9Min: 48.4 / Avg: 104.79 / Max: 105.6Min: 45.6 / Avg: 138.37 / Max: 140.3

Appleseed

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 75.4 / Avg: 224.46 / Max: 231.2Min: 74.4 / Avg: 161.25 / Max: 163.5Min: 74.5 / Avg: 169.02 / Max: 171Min: 79 / Avg: 233.03 / Max: 241.7Min: 48.6 / Avg: 100.19 / Max: 101.3Min: 45.6 / Avg: 138.65 / Max: 160.8

Timed LLVM Compilation

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTimed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74.8 / Avg: 192.91 / Max: 213.3Min: 74.1 / Avg: 156.2 / Max: 165.8Min: 75.8 / Avg: 167.66 / Max: 176.9Min: 79.9 / Avg: 215.93 / Max: 244.1Min: 48.7 / Avg: 101.14 / Max: 104.7Min: 45.4 / Avg: 142.27 / Max: 156.3

Timed Linux Kernel Compilation

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 76 / Avg: 195.51 / Max: 219.8Min: 76.3 / Avg: 153.45 / Max: 167.3Min: 74.7 / Avg: 158.55 / Max: 176.4Min: 78.7 / Avg: 199.09 / Max: 244Min: 48.7 / Avg: 97.01 / Max: 105.4Min: 45.3 / Avg: 127.66 / Max: 166.9

Coremark

CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations/Sec Per Watt, More Is BetterCoremark 1.0CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per SecondAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70014002100280035001895.852150.982508.532847.102306.203386.01

Coremark

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCoremark 1.0System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 76.6 / Avg: 141.92 / Max: 182.1Min: 73.6 / Avg: 130.05 / Max: 143.1Min: 74.2 / Avg: 148.07 / Max: 162.2Min: 76.8 / Avg: 186.83 / Max: 218.6Min: 49 / Avg: 80.86 / Max: 89.7Min: 45.2 / Avg: 116.56 / Max: 140.3

Selenium

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20406080100Min: 72.7 / Avg: 107.41 / Max: 126.7Min: 72.8 / Avg: 100.3 / Max: 109.7Min: 73.8 / Avg: 101.9 / Max: 112.5Min: 77.6 / Avg: 116.09 / Max: 123.6Min: 48.2 / Avg: 60.98 / Max: 67.9Min: 44.9 / Avg: 71.91 / Max: 82.3

Selenium

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 73.5 / Avg: 103.47 / Max: 119.8Min: 73 / Avg: 97.54 / Max: 111.3Min: 72.6 / Avg: 99.48 / Max: 113.3Min: 77.1 / Avg: 112.89 / Max: 134Min: 48 / Avg: 60.95 / Max: 69.3Min: 43.1 / Avg: 66.72 / Max: 77.4

Selenium

Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean Per Watt, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Octane - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K130260390520650328.59383.73384.79334.27599.20613.10

Selenium

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 73.2 / Avg: 100.05 / Max: 120.4Min: 72.5 / Avg: 96.7 / Max: 110.7Min: 73 / Avg: 96.1 / Max: 110.5Min: 77.1 / Avg: 113.27 / Max: 134.2Min: 48.2 / Avg: 58.47 / Max: 68.9Min: 43.7 / Avg: 64.89 / Max: 79.8

Selenium

Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google Chrome

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean Per Watt, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Octane - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2004006008001000422.18507.02504.48452.48777.39680.15

Selenium

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 73.4 / Avg: 101.07 / Max: 121.8Min: 72.8 / Avg: 97.08 / Max: 115.7Min: 73.7 / Avg: 98.12 / Max: 118.4Min: 76.9 / Avg: 110.71 / Max: 133.4Min: 48.2 / Avg: 58.52 / Max: 71.3Min: 44 / Avg: 66.87 / Max: 88.4

Selenium

Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Firefox

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.78531.57062.35593.14123.92651.902.262.261.993.493.46

Selenium

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20406080100Min: 73.5 / Avg: 103.87 / Max: 122.8Min: 73 / Avg: 98.72 / Max: 111.3Min: 72.5 / Avg: 99.4 / Max: 110.3Min: 77.3 / Avg: 114.03 / Max: 127.9Min: 48.3 / Avg: 58.8 / Max: 71.3Min: 44 / Avg: 66.88 / Max: 81.7

Selenium

Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google Chrome

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.8011.6022.4033.2044.0051.782.212.211.943.563.04

Selenium

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 72.7 / Avg: 109.58 / Max: 129.1Min: 73.2 / Avg: 100.67 / Max: 113.5Min: 72.5 / Avg: 101.18 / Max: 114.8Min: 76.1 / Avg: 115.67 / Max: 142.1Min: 48 / Avg: 60.09 / Max: 70.1Min: 43.9 / Avg: 68.32 / Max: 82.9

libjpeg-turbo tjbench

Test: Decompression Throughput

OpenBenchmarking.orgMegapixels/sec Per Watt, More Is Betterlibjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2Test: Decompression ThroughputAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.8821.7642.6463.5284.411.962.592.512.313.743.92

John The Ripper

Test: Blowfish

OpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S Per Watt, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1Test: BlowfishAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K30609012015098.66108.41131.82140.94110.61125.73

John The Ripper

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74.2 / Avg: 181.63 / Max: 207.4Min: 72.6 / Avg: 134.67 / Max: 146.1Min: 72.2 / Avg: 148.65 / Max: 165.2Min: 76 / Avg: 200.73 / Max: 224.5Min: 48.7 / Avg: 88.34 / Max: 93.4Min: 44.1 / Avg: 132.65 / Max: 156.7

GROMACS

Water Benchmark

OpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Day Per Watt, More Is BetterGROMACS 2018.3Water BenchmarkAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.00230.00460.00690.00920.01150.010.01

GROMACS

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGROMACS 2018.3System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74.2 / Avg: 200.04 / Max: 212.3Min: 74.4 / Avg: 150.04 / Max: 154.7Min: 73.9 / Avg: 154.88 / Max: 159.8Min: 75.8 / Avg: 198.82 / Max: 211.7Min: 48.6 / Avg: 108.12 / Max: 111.3Min: 45.1 / Avg: 143.9 / Max: 151.2

CP2K Molecular Dynamics

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 75.7 / Avg: 141.31 / Max: 148.3Min: 74.2 / Avg: 119 / Max: 126.8Min: 75.9 / Avg: 125.02 / Max: 131.6Min: 78.1 / Avg: 154.99 / Max: 162.6Min: 48.6 / Avg: 85.41 / Max: 88.9Min: 45.2 / Avg: 115.04 / Max: 120.4

SVT-AV1

1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.51080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.07880.15760.23640.31520.3940.190.210.310.290.270.35

SVT-HEVC

1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 2019-02-031080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.48150.9631.44451.9262.40751.241.581.732.141.651.86

SVT-HEVC

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSVT-HEVC 2019-02-03System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 9 3900X4080120160200Min: 74.4 / Avg: 115.67 / Max: 233.8

VP9 libvpx Encoding

vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterVP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0vpxenc VP9 1080p Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.3510.7021.0531.4041.7550.801.051.001.051.451.56

VP9 libvpx Encoding

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterVP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 110.1 / Avg: 168.42 / Max: 200.9Min: 71.4 / Avg: 134.48 / Max: 158.7Min: 72 / Avg: 135.38 / Max: 158.5Min: 74.1 / Avg: 170.51 / Max: 204.2Min: 48.3 / Avg: 87.83 / Max: 103.4Min: 44.9 / Avg: 122.64 / Max: 164.8

x264

H.264 Video Encoding

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Betterx264 2018-09-25H.264 Video EncodingAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.20930.41860.62790.83721.04650.450.660.670.880.710.93

x265

H.265 1080p Video Encoding

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Betterx265 3.0H.265 1080p Video EncodingAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.090.180.270.360.450.170.270.300.290.350.40

x265

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Betterx265 3.0System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74.2 / Avg: 178.11 / Max: 211.3Min: 73.2 / Avg: 143.83 / Max: 159.7Min: 72.5 / Avg: 143.09 / Max: 167.6Min: 75.7 / Avg: 179.5 / Max: 217.8Min: 48.4 / Avg: 97.08 / Max: 111.4Min: 45.5 / Avg: 112.19 / Max: 146.1

dav1d

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Betterdav1d 0.3System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 73.5 / Avg: 182.82 / Max: 209.7Min: 73.6 / Avg: 141.02 / Max: 159.5Min: 74 / Avg: 157.37 / Max: 173.7Min: 76.4 / Avg: 184.45 / Max: 222.2Min: 48.2 / Avg: 94.11 / Max: 104Min: 45 / Avg: 127.84 / Max: 149.8

Zstd Compression

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterZstd Compression 1.3.4System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 74.8 / Avg: 139.19 / Max: 157.6Min: 73.9 / Avg: 115.86 / Max: 128.9Min: 74 / Avg: 123.48 / Max: 135.8Min: 77.2 / Avg: 149.73 / Max: 171.3Min: 48.5 / Avg: 82.29 / Max: 91.8Min: 45.1 / Avg: 113.07 / Max: 127.6

XZ Compression

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXZ Compression 5.2.4System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 75.1 / Avg: 144.56 / Max: 174.5Min: 73.8 / Avg: 123.5 / Max: 142.3Min: 73.3 / Avg: 134.82 / Max: 153.6Min: 77.5 / Avg: 158.44 / Max: 184.4Min: 48.3 / Avg: 83.85 / Max: 94.9Min: 45 / Avg: 126.01 / Max: 176.4

Stockfish

Total Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterStockfish 9Total TimeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K40K80K120K160K200K111706.02127374.61155686.49160646.26139652.94181677.15

Stockfish

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterStockfish 9System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 75.2 / Avg: 208.84 / Max: 220Min: 74.1 / Avg: 160.58 / Max: 164.8Min: 73.5 / Avg: 169.09 / Max: 174.2Min: 78.2 / Avg: 233.85 / Max: 243.7Min: 48.8 / Avg: 100.76 / Max: 104.6Min: 45.2 / Avg: 138.56 / Max: 153.5

asmFish

1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes/second Per Watt, More Is BetterasmFish 2018-07-231024 Hash Memory, 26 DepthAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K40K80K120K160K200K117198.66139128.31165344.01166630.69152150.93198396.58

asmFish

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterasmFish 2018-07-23System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 75.8 / Avg: 206.53 / Max: 213.1Min: 72.4 / Avg: 155 / Max: 159Min: 74.3 / Avg: 170.67 / Max: 174.8Min: 78.7 / Avg: 236.12 / Max: 243.6Min: 48.4 / Avg: 100.46 / Max: 102.6Min: 46 / Avg: 141.37 / Max: 145.7

PyBench

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2018-02-16System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20406080100Min: 71.7 / Avg: 96.86 / Max: 104.1Min: 72.7 / Avg: 97.21 / Max: 103.5Min: 79.2 / Avg: 116.39 / Max: 120.8Min: 48.2 / Avg: 58.01 / Max: 61.3Min: 44.5 / Avg: 69.75 / Max: 76.2

NAMD

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNAMD 2.13b1System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74.6 / Avg: 221.56 / Max: 232.8Min: 73.3 / Avg: 158.67 / Max: 163.8Min: 72.5 / Avg: 168.72 / Max: 173.7Min: 76.4 / Avg: 227.79 / Max: 242.1Min: 48.2 / Avg: 107.63 / Max: 110.2Min: 44.6 / Avg: 140.87 / Max: 165.6

Go Benchmarks

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20406080100Min: 75.8 / Avg: 98.97 / Max: 110.1Min: 71.6 / Avg: 91.42 / Max: 101.8Min: 73.7 / Avg: 95.77 / Max: 103.2Min: 75 / Avg: 104.44 / Max: 120.2Min: 48.5 / Avg: 57.88 / Max: 62Min: 44.4 / Avg: 65.52 / Max: 74.4

Go Benchmarks

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 77.5 / Avg: 173.23 / Max: 212.8Min: 44.5 / Avg: 109.38 / Max: 143.8

Go Benchmarks

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 72.6 / Avg: 134.9 / Max: 161Min: 72.1 / Avg: 134.54 / Max: 172Min: 78.2 / Avg: 167.36 / Max: 239.3Min: 48.6 / Avg: 77.77 / Max: 109.2Min: 45.5 / Avg: 120.11 / Max: 144.3

Go Benchmarks

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 72.5 / Avg: 143.09 / Max: 173.6Min: 76.2 / Avg: 176.78 / Max: 237Min: 48.3 / Avg: 86.83 / Max: 105.3Min: 45.1 / Avg: 118.1 / Max: 166.2

Rust Mandelbrot

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterRust MandelbrotSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 74.5 / Avg: 120.57 / Max: 176.2Min: 71.4 / Avg: 105.54 / Max: 128.9Min: 73 / Avg: 100.87 / Max: 143.1Min: 78.5 / Avg: 119.39 / Max: 186.5Min: 47.8 / Avg: 64.17 / Max: 80.1Min: 44.9 / Avg: 77.87 / Max: 134.8

Tensorflow

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTensorflow 2017-02-03System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 73.9 / Avg: 177.01 / Max: 202.6Min: 72.9 / Avg: 134.71 / Max: 154.7Min: 73.1 / Avg: 139.75 / Max: 165.3Min: 77.6 / Avg: 170.66 / Max: 208.4Min: 48.2 / Avg: 93.05 / Max: 106.4Min: 44.9 / Avg: 116.34 / Max: 157.1

Tungsten Renderer

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 75.2 / Avg: 182.87 / Max: 219.6Min: 73.8 / Avg: 145.59 / Max: 159.6Min: 71.6 / Avg: 149.83 / Max: 171.1Min: 78.1 / Avg: 204.41 / Max: 240.9Min: 48.4 / Avg: 93.43 / Max: 98.5Min: 45.2 / Avg: 125.66 / Max: 145.4

Tungsten Renderer

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74.6 / Avg: 160.13 / Max: 202.8Min: 73.8 / Avg: 127.14 / Max: 153.9Min: 74.7 / Avg: 131.08 / Max: 159.6Min: 76.2 / Avg: 156.51 / Max: 196.7Min: 48.4 / Avg: 82.58 / Max: 97.9Min: 44.7 / Avg: 119.2 / Max: 157.3

Tungsten Renderer

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 73.5 / Avg: 117.81 / Max: 148.2Min: 76.3 / Avg: 155.73 / Max: 228.1Min: 48.4 / Avg: 80.01 / Max: 98.4Min: 44.9 / Avg: 91.91 / Max: 141.5

Meta Performance Per Watt

Performance Per Watt

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watt, More Is BetterMeta Performance Per WattPerformance Per WattAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4008001200160020001593.401284.881433.661689.591695.161452.53

System Power Consumption Monitor

Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring

OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsSystem Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70140210280350Min: 72 / Avg: 179.65 / Max: 402.8Min: 71.4 / Avg: 143.91 / Max: 394.9Min: 71.6 / Avg: 148.51 / Max: 401.6Min: 73.5 / Avg: 183.98 / Max: 411Min: 47.5 / Avg: 92.05 / Max: 111.4Min: 43.1 / Avg: 124.3 / Max: 363.4

GIMP

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XIntel Core i5 9400F20406080100Min: 72.4 / Avg: 97.04 / Max: 115.8Min: 73.8 / Avg: 97.95 / Max: 124.9Min: 48.2 / Avg: 66.55 / Max: 81

SVT-AV1

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.5System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 72.6 / Avg: 127.26 / Max: 162.4Min: 73.6 / Avg: 114.74 / Max: 169.3Min: 48.3 / Avg: 82.44 / Max: 105.9Min: 44.7 / Avg: 99.53 / Max: 147.5

dav1d

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Betterdav1d 0.3System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XIntel Core i5 9400F306090120150Min: 73.9 / Avg: 120.09 / Max: 146.8Min: 74.1 / Avg: 118.21 / Max: 151.2Min: 48.4 / Avg: 83.4 / Max: 97.3

Tungsten Renderer

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 72.1 / Avg: 128.13 / Max: 156.2Min: 73.5 / Avg: 144.36 / Max: 172.3Min: 48.3 / Avg: 87.41 / Max: 102.1Min: 45 / Avg: 105.36 / Max: 141.9

Darktable

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600X20406080100Min: 72.5 / Avg: 74.06 / Max: 75.8Min: 72.7 / Avg: 79.94 / Max: 104.4

Darktable

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0System Power Consumption MonitorIntel Core i5 9400F20406080100Min: 48.6 / Avg: 67.87 / Max: 100.1

x264

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Betterx264 2018-09-25System Power Consumption MonitorIntel Core i5 9400F20406080100Min: 48.6 / Avg: 81.91 / Max: 103.8

Tesseract

Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.42080.84161.26241.68322.1041.351.491.120.751.870.721. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Xonotic

Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.43430.86861.30291.73722.17151.161.481.150.751.930.721. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Xonotic

Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.36230.72461.08691.44921.81150.921.160.890.591.610.581. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

SuperTuxKart

Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela CityAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.11030.22060.33090.44120.55150.290.290.220.150.490.151. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Blender

Performance / Cost - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Performance / Cost - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-OnlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20K40K60K80K100K49458.8852847.7653603.9756756.2645671.4884780.281. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Blender

Performance / Cost - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Performance / Cost - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-OnlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70K140K210K280K350K196778.88211341.24215629.89229584.91191162.53333479.641. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Darktable

Performance / Cost - Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Performance / Cost - Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-onlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K150030004500600075003172.462763.903753.895573.831965.316807.321. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Darktable

Performance / Cost - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Performance / Cost - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-onlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K60012001800240030001582.421516.411756.862265.461141.342662.661. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Darktable

Performance / Cost - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Performance / Cost - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-onlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4008001200160020001046.481088.131273.231781.43797.152074.801. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

GIMP

Performance / Cost - Test: unsharp-mask

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Performance / Cost - Test: unsharp-maskAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2K4K6K8K10K4480.563797.255201.498562.842327.387419.881. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

GIMP

Performance / Cost - Test: resize

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Performance / Cost - Test: resizeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K80016002400320040002199.641947.182474.083737.511227.763344.381. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

GIMP

Performance / Cost - Test: rotate

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Performance / Cost - Test: rotateAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K130026003900520065003368.042958.123882.205888.201956.375503.161. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

GIMP

Performance / Cost - Test: auto-levels

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Performance / Cost - Test: auto-levelsAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K150030004500600075003901.443344.074477.697155.662096.436258.981. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Appleseed

Performance / Cost - Scene: Emily

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaPerformance / Cost - Scene: EmilyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K40K80K120K160K200K107363.26119963.22124681.13135723.01115445.20208067.861. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Appleseed

Performance / Cost - Scene: Disney Material

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaPerformance / Cost - Scene: Disney MaterialAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K30K60K90K120K150K61501.0277147.6778341.4884196.2760616.18121197.961. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Appleseed

Performance / Cost - Scene: Material Tester

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaPerformance / Cost - Scene: Material TesterAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20K40K60K80K100K57302.4067969.5370294.1481097.4862743.90114642.581. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Timed LLVM Compilation

Performance / Cost - Time To Compile

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterTimed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1Performance / Cost - Time To CompileAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K40K80K120K160K200K120218.20102588.00109741.24121551.4193791.03182962.781. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Timed Linux Kernel Compilation

Performance / Cost - Time To Compile

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18Performance / Cost - Time To CompileAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K7K14K21K28K35K19326.8617937.9619134.6420893.1316713.3332594.121. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Coremark

Performance / Cost - CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations/Sec Per Dollar, More Is BetterCoremark 1.0Performance / Cost - CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per SecondAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K300600900120015001059.301123.451128.971066.001251.57798.951. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Selenium

Performance / Cost - Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox

OpenBenchmarking.orgms x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumPerformance / Cost - Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K6K12K18K24K30K15171.4212840.9316759.2625698.507716.7125297.741. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Selenium

Performance / Cost - Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome

OpenBenchmarking.orgms x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumPerformance / Cost - Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2K4K6K8K10K5910.584845.546320.099605.752972.5511505.261. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Selenium

Performance / Cost - Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean Per Dollar, More Is BetterSeleniumPerformance / Cost - Benchmark: Octane - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K50100150200250129.43149.03112.4075.88235.1380.541. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Selenium

Performance / Cost - Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google Chrome

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean Per Dollar, More Is BetterSeleniumPerformance / Cost - Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70140210280350167.99197.67150.45100.39305.3392.071. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Selenium

Performance / Cost - Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Firefox

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Dollar, More Is BetterSeleniumPerformance / Cost - Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.31050.6210.93151.2421.55250.780.900.680.451.380.471. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Selenium

Performance / Cost - Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google Chrome

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Dollar, More Is BetterSeleniumPerformance / Cost - Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.3240.6480.9721.2961.620.770.890.680.451.440.421. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

libjpeg-turbo tjbench

Performance / Cost - Test: Decompression Throughput

OpenBenchmarking.orgMegapixels/sec Per Dollar, More Is Betterlibjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2Performance / Cost - Test: Decompression ThroughputAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.30150.6030.90451.2061.50750.710.880.670.451.340.491. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

John The Ripper

Performance / Cost - Test: Blowfish

OpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S Per Dollar, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1Performance / Cost - Test: BlowfishAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K163248648070.5558.6359.5656.7065.5833.761. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

CP2K Molecular Dynamics

Performance / Cost - Fayalite-FIST Data

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterCP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1Performance / Cost - Fayalite-FIST DataAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70K140K210K280K350K134703.8280068.44104733.86162539.27116267.68315191.761. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

SVT-AV1

Performance / Cost - 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.5Performance / Cost - 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.03380.06760.10140.13520.1690.100.100.110.090.150.071. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

SVT-HEVC

Performance / Cost - 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 2019-02-03Performance / Cost - 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.18230.36460.54690.72920.91150.590.630.590.500.810.391. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

VP9 libvpx Encoding

Performance / Cost - vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterVP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0Performance / Cost - vpxenc VP9 1080p Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.19350.3870.58050.7740.96750.530.570.410.360.860.391. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

x264

Performance / Cost - H.264 Video Encoding

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Betterx264 2018-09-25Performance / Cost - H.264 Video EncodingAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.08780.17560.26340.35120.4390.310.310.280.280.390.191. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

x265

Performance / Cost - H.265 1080p Video Encoding

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Betterx265 3.0Performance / Cost - H.265 1080p Video EncodingAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.05180.10360.15540.20720.2590.120.160.130.100.230.091. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

dav1d

Performance / Cost - Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is Betterdav1d 0.3Performance / Cost - Video Input: Summer Nature 1080pAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K90018002700360045002992.122634.423220.914011.961889.323793.921. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

dav1d

Performance / Cost - Video Input: Summer Nature 4K

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is Betterdav1d 0.3Performance / Cost - Video Input: Summer Nature 4KAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3K6K9K12K15K8707.127646.798580.3210913.136348.8913120.641. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Zstd Compression

Performance / Cost - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterZstd Compression 1.3.4Performance / Cost - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3K6K9K12K15K7350.766785.257349.868962.044289.7111954.801. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

XZ Compression

Performance / Cost - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterXZ Compression 5.2.4Performance / Cost - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3K6K9K12K15K10012.689668.6710366.7912719.516831.6514059.241. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Stockfish

Performance / Cost - Total Time

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterStockfish 9Performance / Cost - Total TimeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20K40K60K80K100K91846.6882141.8380016.7175284.8294439.1350957.131. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

asmFish

Performance / Cost - 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes/second Per Dollar, More Is BetterasmFish 2018-07-23Performance / Cost - 1024 Hash Memory, 26 DepthAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20K40K60K80K100K95296.9786604.8085774.7578848.46102579.9156774.781. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

PyBench

Performance / Cost - Total For Average Test Times

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2018-02-16Performance / Cost - Total For Average Test TimesAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K100K200K300K400K500K280670.00238791.00309589.00458581.00142146.00395694.001. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

NAMD

Performance / Cost - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms

OpenBenchmarking.orgdays/ns x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterNAMD 2.13b1Performance / Cost - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 AtomsAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2004006008001000583.90673.47680.82725.03404.33867.351. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Go Benchmarks

Performance / Cost - Test: build

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksPerformance / Cost - Test: buildAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K1500000M3000000M4500000M6000000M7500000M4064302165512.003384019372005.004523861530013.006879656285157.001911052611348.005441630199018.001. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Go Benchmarks

Performance / Cost - Test: http

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksPerformance / Cost - Test: httpAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K500K1000K1500K2000K2500K1472438.001635432.001716064.002450589.001179484.002150382.001. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Go Benchmarks

Performance / Cost - Test: json

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksPerformance / Cost - Test: jsonAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K600M1200M1800M2400M3000M1658517892.001888293243.001913680153.002028051768.001208987639.002834634738.001. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Go Benchmarks

Performance / Cost - Test: garbage

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksPerformance / Cost - Test: garbageAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K120M240M360M480M600M349754444.00389434257.00386004185.00429044192.00306434443.00568872616.001. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Rust Mandelbrot

Performance / Cost - Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterRust MandelbrotPerformance / Cost - Time To Complete Serial/Parallel MandelbrotAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K5K10K15K20K25K11638.2811152.7113390.3018038.8511386.5821755.761. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Tensorflow

Performance / Cost - Build: Cifar10

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterTensorflow 2017-02-03Performance / Cost - Build: Cifar10AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3K6K9K12K15K9174.486864.938530.9710918.124997.4611786.841. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Tungsten Renderer

Performance / Cost - Scene: Hair

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Performance / Cost - Scene: HairAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3K6K9K12K15K7025.648112.428195.398747.477871.6713846.821. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Tungsten Renderer

Performance / Cost - Scene: Water Caustic

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Performance / Cost - Scene: Water CausticAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3K6K9K12K15K7846.067614.428810.6211966.025866.1312374.701. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Tungsten Renderer

Performance / Cost - Scene: Non-Exponential

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Performance / Cost - Scene: Non-ExponentialAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K80016002400320040002352.042908.322730.703433.122310.993808.741. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Tungsten Renderer

Performance / Cost - Scene: Volumetric Caustic

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Performance / Cost - Scene: Volumetric CausticAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K110022003300440055002984.503359.013375.543752.482866.764940.001. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Darktable

Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.2Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3246810SE +/- 0.06, N = 38.04

Darktable

Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.2Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3246810SE +/- 0.06, N = 86.09

Darktable

Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.2Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v30.86851.7372.60553.4744.3425SE +/- 0.06, N = 153.86

GIMP

Test: unsharp-mask

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.8.22Test: unsharp-mask2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31020304050SE +/- 0.06, N = 345.66

GIMP

Test: resize

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.8.22Test: resize2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v33691215SE +/- 0.03, N = 39.62

GIMP

Test: rotate

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.8.22Test: rotate2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3612182430SE +/- 0.04, N = 323.38

GIMP

Test: auto-levels

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.8.22Test: auto-levels2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3510152025SE +/- 0.05, N = 322.80

Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4