mark4-1

2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 testing with a HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB on openSUSE 15.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1908208-CJCO-MERGE1994
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

AV1 2 Tests
Web Browsers 1 Tests
Chess Test Suite 2 Tests
Timed Code Compilation 3 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 17 Tests
Compression Tests 4 Tests
CPU Massive 36 Tests
Creator Workloads 18 Tests
Cryptography 2 Tests
Desktop Graphics 4 Tests
Disk Test Suite 6 Tests
Encoding 7 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 6 Tests
Imaging 4 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 3 Tests
Molecular Dynamics 3 Tests
Multi-Core 33 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 3 Tests
OpenCL 3 Tests
OpenGL Demos Test Suite 5 Tests
OpenMPI Tests 2 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 5 Tests
Python Tests 5 Tests
Renderers 7 Tests
Scientific Computing 3 Tests
Server 2 Tests
Server CPU Tests 28 Tests
Single-Threaded 4 Tests
Unigine Test Suite 5 Tests
Video Encoding 7 Tests
Common Workstation Benchmarks 6 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1
August 17 2019
  13 Hours, 13 Minutes
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2
August 18 2019
  30 Minutes
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3
August 18 2019
 
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #4
August 18 2019
 
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #5
August 19 2019
 
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #6
August 19 2019
 
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
August 15 2019
  3 Hours, 38 Minutes
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
August 13 2019
  4 Hours, 5 Minutes
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
August 13 2019
  3 Hours, 13 Minutes
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
August 12 2019
  2 Hours, 35 Minutes
Intel Core i5 9400F
August 18 2019
  4 Hours, 39 Minutes
Intel Core i9 9900K
August 16 2019
  3 Hours, 18 Minutes
2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v3
August 20 2019
 
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3
August 20 2019
  3 Hours, 27 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  2 Hours, 46 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


mark4-1ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionOpenGLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #4Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #5Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #6AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v32 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v32 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores)HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS)Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon32768MB512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640ASNVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (324/324MHz)Intel C610/X99DELL U2410Intel I218-LM + Intel I210openSUSE 15.14.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64)KDE Plasma 5.12.8X Server 1.20.3NVIDIA 390.1161.0.65GCC 7.4.0ext41920x1200NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (666/3004MHz)4.5.0AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Eight-Core @ 3.70GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (0803 BIOS)AMD 17h16384MB2000GB Force MP600AMD Vega 20 16GB (1802/1001MHz)AMD Device ab20ASUS VP28URealtek Device 8125 + Intel I211 + Intel Device 2723Ubuntu 19.045.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190811GNOME Shell 3.32.2X Server 1.20.4amdgpu 19.0.14.5 Mesa 19.0.2 (LLVM 8.0.0)GCC 8.3.03840x2160AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6-Core @ 3.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads)AMD Device 1480AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core @ 3.60GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads)Intel Core i5-9400F @ 4.10GHz (6 Cores)ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS)Intel Cannon Lake PCHRealtek ALC1220Acer B286HKIntel I219-VIntel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores)HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS)Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon32768MB512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640ASNVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (324/324MHz)Intel C610/X99DELL U2410Intel I218-LM + Intel I210openSUSE 15.14.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64)KDE Plasma 5.12.8X Server 1.20.3NVIDIA 390.1161.0.65GCC 7.4.01920x1200NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (666/3004MHz)NVIDIA 390.1294.5.0OpenBenchmarking.orgCompiler Details- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1: --build=x86_64-suse-linux --disable-libcc1 --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-plugin --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,ada,go --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --enable-linux-futex --enable-multilib --enable-offload-targets=hsa,nvptx-none=/usr/nvptx-none, --enable-ssp --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --host=x86_64-suse-linux --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch-32=x86-64 --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver --without-system-libunwind- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2: --build=x86_64-suse-linux --disable-libcc1 --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-plugin --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,ada,go --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --enable-linux-futex --enable-multilib --enable-offload-targets=hsa,nvptx-none=/usr/nvptx-none, --enable-ssp --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --host=x86_64-suse-linux --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch-32=x86-64 --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver --without-system-libunwind- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3: --build=x86_64-suse-linux --disable-libcc1 --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-plugin --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,ada,go --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --enable-linux-futex --enable-multilib --enable-offload-targets=hsa,nvptx-none=/usr/nvptx-none, --enable-ssp --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --host=x86_64-suse-linux --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch-32=x86-64 --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver --without-system-libunwind- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #4: --build=x86_64-suse-linux --disable-libcc1 --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-plugin --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,ada,go --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --enable-linux-futex --enable-multilib --enable-offload-targets=hsa,nvptx-none=/usr/nvptx-none, --enable-ssp --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --host=x86_64-suse-linux --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch-32=x86-64 --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver --without-system-libunwind- AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v- AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v- AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v- Intel Core i5 9400F: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v- Intel Core i9 9900K: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v3: --build=x86_64-suse-linux --disable-libcc1 --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-plugin --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,ada,go --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --enable-linux-futex --enable-multilib --enable-offload-targets=hsa,nvptx-none=/usr/nvptx-none, --enable-ssp --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --host=x86_64-suse-linux --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch-32=x86-64 --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver --without-system-libunwind- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: --build=x86_64-suse-linux --disable-libcc1 --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-plugin --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,ada,go --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --enable-linux-futex --enable-multilib --enable-offload-targets=hsa,nvptx-none=/usr/nvptx-none, --enable-ssp --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --host=x86_64-suse-linux --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch-32=x86-64 --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver --without-system-libunwindProcessor Details- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #4: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #5: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #6: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand- Intel Core i5 9400F: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- Intel Core i9 9900K: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v3: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersaveOpenCL Details- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1, Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3, Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #6, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v3, 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: GPU Compute Cores: 2304Security Details- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB filling- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB filling- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB filling- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #4: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB filling- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #5: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB filling- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #6: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB filling- AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional STIBP: disabled RSB filling- AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling- AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional STIBP: always-on RSB filling- Intel Core i5 9400F: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: disabled RSB filling- Intel Core i9 9900K: l1tf: Not affected + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v3: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB filling- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT disabled + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT disabled + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW RSB fillingDisk Details- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2: DEADLINE / data=ordered,relatime,rwPython Details- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2: Python 2.7.14 + Python 3.6.5- Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3: Python 2.7.14 + Python 3.6.5- AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- Intel Core i5 9400F: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- Intel Core i9 9900K: Python 2.7.16 + Python 3.7.3- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v3: Python 2.7.14 + Python 3.6.5- 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: Python 2.7.14 + Python 3.6.5Graphics Details- AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, AMD Ryzen 5 3600X, AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, Intel Core i5 9400F, Intel Core i9 9900K: GLAMOR

mark4-1rodinia: OpenMP LavaMDrodinia: OpenMP CFD Solvernamd: ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atomsx264: H.264 Video Encodingx265: H.265 1080p Video Encodingcompress-7zip: Compress Speed Teststockfish: Total Timeasmfish: 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depthbuild-gcc: Time To Compilebuild-linux-kernel: Time To Compileradiance: Serialradiance: SMP Parallelopenssl: RSA 4096-bit Performancectx-clock: Context Switch Timesysbench: CPUsqlite: Timed SQLite Insertionsfio: Rand Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 2MB - Default Test Directoryfio: Rand Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Rand Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Rand Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 2MB - Default Test Directoryfio: Rand Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Rand Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 2MB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 2MB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Sizefs-mark: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threadsfs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Sizefs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSyncdbench: 12 Clientsdbench: 1 Clientscompilebench: Compilecompilebench: Initial Createcompilebench: Read Compiled Treepostmark: Disk Transaction Performanceparboil: OpenMP CUTCPttsiod-renderer: Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mappingsvt-hevc: 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encodesvt-vp9: 1080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video Encodegraphics-magick: Resizingswet: Averagebuild-llvm: Time To Compilec-ray: Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixelcompress-pbzip2: 256MB File Compressionprimesieve: 1e12 Prime Number Generationsmallpt: Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samplessysbench: Memoryunigine-heaven: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - OpenGLunigine-sanctuary: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreenunigine-super: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGLunigine-super: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - High - OpenGLunigine-super: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - Ultra - OpenGLunigine-super: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGLunigine-tropics: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreenunigine-valley: 1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - OpenGLblender: BMW27 - CUDAblender: BMW27 - OpenCLblender: BMW27 - CPU-Onlyblender: Classroom - CUDAblender: Fishy Cat - CUDAblender: Barbershop - CUDAblender: Classroom - OpenCLblender: Fishy Cat - OpenCLblender: Barbershop - OpenCLblender: Classroom - CPU-Onlyblender: Fishy Cat - CPU-Onlyblender: Barbershop - CPU-Onlyblender: Pabellon Barcelona - CUDAblender: Pabellon Barcelona - OpenCLblender: Pabellon Barcelona - CPU-Onlytesseract: 3840 x 2160xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimatesupertuxkart: 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen - Ultimate - 6 - Candela Citydarktable: Boat - CPU-onlydarktable: Masskrug - CPU-onlydarktable: Server Room - CPU-onlygimp: unsharp-maskgimp: resizegimp: rotategimp: auto-levelsappleseed: Emilyappleseed: Disney Materialappleseed: Material Testercoremark: CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Secondselenium: ARES-6 - Firefoxselenium: ARES-6 - Google Chromeselenium: Octane - Firefoxselenium: Octane - Google Chromeselenium: Jetstream - Firefoxselenium: Jetstream - Google Chrometjbench: Decompression Throughputjohn-the-ripper: Blowfishgromacs: Water Benchmarkcp2k: Fayalite-FIST Datasvt-av1: 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encodevpxenc: vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encodedav1d: Summer Nature 1080pdav1d: Summer Nature 4Kcompress-zstd: Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19compress-xz: Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9pybench: Total For Average Test Timesgo-benchmark: buildgo-benchmark: httpgo-benchmark: jsongo-benchmark: garbagerust-mandel: Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrottensorflow: Cifar10tungsten: Hairtungsten: Water Caustictungsten: Non-Exponentialtungsten: Volumetric Causticdarktable: Boat - CPU-onlydarktable: Masskrug - CPU-onlydarktable: Server Room - CPU-onlygimp: unsharp-maskgimp: resizegimp: rotategimp: auto-levelsZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #4Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #5Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #6AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v32 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v359.6220.851.3985291.1010.86611093138274733462707836.1762.28936.89280.142425.57117815609.49109.312157644164733149540310300016968432158001500769196833104.57207.88102.031734.40292.6257.531582.73402.191975.7548703.56402.20148.8352.72208642066116333.9865.373.7017.9010.434056583.3149.66212.0170.27247.8032.93168.4358.04378.74382.81149.24453.841041.57778.78451.601008.60772.95408.75229.87635.721099.971100.01525.9061.7421.871.4005310.8160400313519293365465662.3115595.182.2988078.6130.27233290572420543076.09149473195775342.9629423472.9912.496.234.1217.648.6613.2615.36422.69242.13225.6026906359.7323.273287442670197195181179190.7253025.9813511.7834.2828.9439.4211051600118962857976529598137698645.8236.1227.6630.899.2611.752.7046976.9038.88204533162156459572.04156412212849371.3736928973.3811.106.094.3715.257.8211.8813.43481.78309.83272.9727973951.5719.463710849221223222219145990.6632226.0914110.5830.7127.2538.839591359043924565687583507156399344.7927.5732.5830.5811.6813.492.0693592.9443.48263254992821989258.16193334163655368.7737729373.6011.415.343.8715.817.5211.8013.61378.97238.12213.6637143050.9419.213698049499225224220195950.7631835.401369.7926.0822.3431.519411375033899752165816657117326540.7025.9324.9126.788.3010.261.45296139.2552.24375671273934538141.87248244114460376.1937329273.5411.174.543.5717.167.4911.8014.34271.99168.73162.5253193351.5019.253786250093226224227282910.9832646.041798.0421.8717.9625.49919137868863434911406423285980836.1521.8817.5323.986.887.522.7136458.2933.581407143015284406112.171206293071283279.0428824073.7213.197.665.3515.628.2413.1314.07774.80406.82421.1018648451.7919.95350344549420521420097720.7478022.4612812.6842.6128.7945.859541282585645279168114011205660776.4233.5452.8339.3715.5119.241.7557794.5344.94251728232804673965.98192370172675353.5135428874.3813.785.394.2015.026.7711.1412.67421.19245.34232.0739468151.2123.293978645482231208240166780.8463835.211917.6826.5624.2028.468011101544574743535738127115156444.0423.8628.0325.057.7110.001.3980790.5510.89315643513404686162.3515634914661029322545.9538694970.1125.082574234657154169155200601.25251231.3417517.0824.1316261992946253665144447534144699058.7824.0130.4714.6311.788.046.093.8645.669.6223.3822.80OpenBenchmarking.org

Rodinia

Rodinia is a suite focused upon accelerating compute-intensive applications with accelerators. CUDA, OpenMP, and OpenCL parallel models are supported by the included applications. This profile utilizes the OpenCL and OpenMP test binaries at the moment. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 2.4Test: OpenMP LavaMDZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #21428425670SE +/- 0.26, N = 3SE +/- 0.76, N = 359.6261.741. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 2.4Test: OpenMP LavaMDZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #21224364860Min: 59.1 / Avg: 59.62 / Max: 59.88Min: 60.25 / Avg: 61.74 / Max: 62.721. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 2.4Test: OpenMP CFD SolverZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2510152025SE +/- 0.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 1520.8521.871. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 2.4Test: OpenMP CFD SolverZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2510152025Min: 20.33 / Avg: 20.85 / Max: 21.21Min: 20.45 / Avg: 21.87 / Max: 26.451. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lOpenCL

NAMD

NAMD is a parallel molecular dynamics code designed for high-performance simulation of large biomolecular systems. NAMD was developed by the Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group in the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgdays/ns, Fewer Is BetterNAMD 2.13b1ATPase Simulation - 327,506 AtomsZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v30.61061.22121.83182.44243.053SE +/- 0.00337, N = 3SE +/- 0.00173, N = 3SE +/- 0.00116, N = 8SE +/- 0.00123, N = 11SE +/- 0.00078, N = 7SE +/- 0.00477, N = 3SE +/- 0.00742, N = 3SE +/- 0.00394, N = 3SE +/- 0.00182, N = 31.398521.400532.298802.704692.069351.452962.713641.755771.39807
OpenBenchmarking.orgdays/ns, Fewer Is BetterNAMD 2.13b1ATPase Simulation - 327,506 AtomsZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3246810Min: 1.39 / Avg: 1.4 / Max: 1.4Min: 1.4 / Avg: 1.4 / Max: 1.4Min: 2.29 / Avg: 2.3 / Max: 2.31Min: 2.7 / Avg: 2.7 / Max: 2.71Min: 2.07 / Avg: 2.07 / Max: 2.07Min: 1.44 / Avg: 1.45 / Max: 1.46Min: 2.7 / Avg: 2.71 / Max: 2.73Min: 1.75 / Avg: 1.76 / Max: 1.76Min: 1.4 / Avg: 1.4 / Max: 1.4

x264

This is a simple test of the x264 encoder run on the CPU (OpenCL support disabled) with a sample video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2018-09-25H.264 Video EncodingZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3306090120150SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.70, N = 3SE +/- 0.76, N = 3SE +/- 0.90, N = 3SE +/- 1.89, N = 3SE +/- 0.92, N = 3SE +/- 0.82, N = 3SE +/- 0.60, N = 391.1078.6176.9092.94139.2558.2994.5390.551. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -ffast-math -std=gnu99 -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-vectorize
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2018-09-25H.264 Video EncodingZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3306090120150Min: 90.91 / Avg: 91.1 / Max: 91.41Min: 77.22 / Avg: 78.61 / Max: 79.46Min: 75.43 / Avg: 76.9 / Max: 77.96Min: 91.15 / Avg: 92.94 / Max: 93.98Min: 135.51 / Avg: 139.25 / Max: 141.63Min: 56.45 / Avg: 58.29 / Max: 59.24Min: 92.89 / Avg: 94.53 / Max: 95.41Min: 89.37 / Avg: 90.55 / Max: 91.331. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -ffast-math -std=gnu99 -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-vectorize

x265

This is a simple test of the x265 encoder run on the CPU with a sample 1080p video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx265 3.0H.265 1080p Video EncodingZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31224364860SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 310.8610.8130.2738.8843.4852.2433.5844.9410.89-lnuma-lnuma1. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx265 3.0H.265 1080p Video EncodingZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31020304050Min: 10.84 / Avg: 10.86 / Max: 10.89Min: 10.79 / Avg: 10.81 / Max: 10.85Min: 30.24 / Avg: 30.27 / Max: 30.29Min: 38.74 / Avg: 38.88 / Max: 39.15Min: 43.3 / Avg: 43.48 / Max: 43.69Min: 51.92 / Avg: 52.24 / Max: 52.55Min: 33.5 / Avg: 33.58 / Max: 33.69Min: 44.67 / Avg: 44.94 / Max: 45.13Min: 10.82 / Avg: 10.89 / Max: 10.971. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -ldl

7-Zip Compression

This is a test of 7-Zip using p7zip with its integrated benchmark feature or upstream 7-Zip for the Windows x64 build. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 16.02Compress Speed TestZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #213K26K39K52K65KSE +/- 435.68, N = 3SE +/- 275.37, N = 361109604001. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 16.02Compress Speed TestZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #211K22K33K44K55KMin: 60297 / Avg: 61108.67 / Max: 61789Min: 59975 / Avg: 60400.33 / Max: 609161. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -lpthread

Stockfish

This is a test of Stockfish, an advanced C++11 chess benchmark that can scale up to 128 CPU cores. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterStockfish 9Total TimeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v38M16M24M32M40MSE +/- 135172.55, N = 3SE +/- 417821.87, N = 4SE +/- 47780.58, N = 3SE +/- 160816.35, N = 3SE +/- 159059.56, N = 3SE +/- 31926.05, N = 3SE +/- 83551.49, N = 3SE +/- 158667.61, N = 3SE +/- 79600.42, N = 33138274731351929233290572045331626325499375671271407143025172823315643511. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++11 -pedantic -O3 -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -flto
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterStockfish 9Total TimeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v37M14M21M28M35MMin: 31134646 / Avg: 31382747 / Max: 31599799Min: 30890036 / Avg: 31351928.75 / Max: 32603305Min: 23235804 / Avg: 23329057.33 / Max: 23393762Min: 20136103 / Avg: 20453316.33 / Max: 20657939Min: 26030052 / Avg: 26325499.33 / Max: 26575365Min: 37523394 / Avg: 37567127.33 / Max: 37629285Min: 13904643 / Avg: 14071429.67 / Max: 14163723Min: 24862465 / Avg: 25172823 / Max: 25385314Min: 31407658 / Avg: 31564350.67 / Max: 316670741. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lpthread -fno-exceptions -std=c++11 -pedantic -O3 -msse -msse3 -mpopcnt -flto

asmFish

This is a test of asmFish, an advanced chess benchmark written in Assembly. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes/second, More Is BetterasmFish 2018-07-231024 Hash Memory, 26 DepthZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v38M16M24M32M40MSE +/- 272766.83, N = 3SE +/- 445113.17, N = 3SE +/- 59405.65, N = 3SE +/- 255715.94, N = 3SE +/- 247680.63, N = 3SE +/- 358905.13, N = 3SE +/- 192896.54, N = 5SE +/- 242476.95, N = 3SE +/- 515708.70, N = 3334627073365465624205430215645952821989239345381152844062804673934046861
OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes/second, More Is BetterasmFish 2018-07-231024 Hash Memory, 26 DepthZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v37M14M21M28M35MMin: 32953543 / Avg: 33462707 / Max: 33886904Min: 32792850 / Avg: 33654656.33 / Max: 34278807Min: 24109441 / Avg: 24205429.67 / Max: 24314060Min: 21091714 / Avg: 21564595.33 / Max: 21969735Min: 27902009 / Avg: 28219892 / Max: 28707847Min: 38756384 / Avg: 39345380.67 / Max: 39995197Min: 14898547 / Avg: 15284406 / Max: 15902705Min: 27592041 / Avg: 28046739.33 / Max: 28420110Min: 33215431 / Avg: 34046861 / Max: 34991168

Timed GCC Compilation

This test times how long it takes to build the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC). Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed GCC Compilation 8.2Time To CompileZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000836.17

Timed Linux Kernel Compilation

This test times how long it takes to build the Linux kernel in a default configuration. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18Time To CompileZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3306090120150SE +/- 0.86, N = 3SE +/- 0.83, N = 3SE +/- 0.84, N = 3SE +/- 0.65, N = 3SE +/- 0.71, N = 3SE +/- 0.62, N = 4SE +/- 0.91, N = 3SE +/- 0.80, N = 3SE +/- 0.85, N = 362.2862.3176.0972.0458.1641.87112.1765.9862.35
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18Time To CompileZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v320406080100Min: 61.37 / Avg: 62.28 / Max: 64Min: 61.46 / Avg: 62.31 / Max: 63.97Min: 75.22 / Avg: 76.09 / Max: 77.76Min: 71.35 / Avg: 72.04 / Max: 73.35Min: 57.46 / Avg: 58.16 / Max: 59.58Min: 41.24 / Avg: 41.87 / Max: 43.72Min: 111 / Avg: 112.17 / Max: 113.96Min: 65.07 / Avg: 65.98 / Max: 67.57Min: 61.37 / Avg: 62.35 / Max: 64.04

Radiance Benchmark

This is a benchmark of NREL Radiance, a synthetic imaging system that is open-source and developed by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRadiance Benchmark 5.0Test: SerialZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000936.89

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRadiance Benchmark 5.0Test: SMP ParallelZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #160120180240300280.14

OpenSSL

OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test measures the RSA 4096-bit performance of OpenSSL. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSigns Per Second, More Is BetterOpenSSL 1.1.1RSA 4096-bit PerformanceZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #15001000150020002500SE +/- 2.46, N = 32425.571. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl

ctx_clock

Ctx_clock is a simple test program to measure the context switch time in clock cycles. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgClocks, Fewer Is Betterctx_clockContext Switch TimeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #130060090012001500SE +/- 1.67, N = 31178

Sysbench

This is a benchmark of Sysbench with CPU and memory sub-tests. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgEvents Per Second, More Is BetterSysbench 2018-07-28Test: CPUZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #23K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 10.52, N = 3SE +/- 4.32, N = 315609.4915595.181. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -O3 -funroll-loops -ggdb3 -march=haswell -rdynamic -ldl -laio -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgEvents Per Second, More Is BetterSysbench 2018-07-28Test: CPUZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #23K6K9K12K15KMin: 15596.87 / Avg: 15609.49 / Max: 15630.39Min: 15590.2 / Avg: 15595.18 / Max: 15603.791. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -O3 -funroll-loops -ggdb3 -march=haswell -rdynamic -ldl -laio -lm

SQLite

This is a simple benchmark of SQLite. At present this test profile just measures the time to perform a pre-defined number of insertions on an indexed database. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.22Timed SQLite InsertionsZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #120406080100SE +/- 0.17, N = 3109.311. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lz -ldl -lpthread

Flexible IO Tester

Fio is an advanced disk benchmark that depends upon the kernel's AIO access library. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1500100015002000250021571. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1140280420560700SE +/- 10.74, N = 156441. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #140K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 2743.77, N = 151647331. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #130060090012001500SE +/- 3.21, N = 314951. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1901802703604504031. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #120K40K60K80K100K1030001. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1400800120016002000SE +/- 0.33, N = 316961. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000SE +/- 39.12, N = 158431. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #150K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 10025.78, N = 152158001. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #130060090012001500SE +/- 3.18, N = 315001. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1170340510680850SE +/- 24.05, N = 127691. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #140K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 6138.35, N = 121968331. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lz -lm -lpthread -ldl

FS-Mark

FS_Mark is designed to test a system's file-system performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB SizeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #120406080100SE +/- 0.84, N = 3104.571. (CC) gcc options: -static

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 ThreadsZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #150100150200250SE +/- 6.74, N = 15207.881. (CC) gcc options: -static

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB SizeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #120406080100SE +/- 0.32, N = 3102.031. (CC) gcc options: -static

OpenBenchmarking.orgFiles/s, More Is BetterFS-Mark 3.3Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSyncZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1400800120016002000SE +/- 2.31, N = 31734.401. (CC) gcc options: -static

Dbench

Dbench is a benchmark designed by the Samba project as a free alternative to netbench, but dbench contains only file-system calls for testing the disk performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.012 ClientsZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #160120180240300SE +/- 0.78, N = 3292.621. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDbench 4.01 ClientsZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #11326395265SE +/- 0.08, N = 357.531. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2

Compile Bench

Compilebench tries to age a filesystem by simulating some of the disk IO common in creating, compiling, patching, stating and reading kernel trees. It indirectly measures how well filesystems can maintain directory locality as the disk fills up and directories age. This current test is setup to use the makej mode with 10 initial directories Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: CompileZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #130060090012001500SE +/- 19.55, N = 31582.73

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Initial CreateZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #190180270360450SE +/- 4.63, N = 3402.19

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Read Compiled TreeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1400800120016002000SE +/- 42.24, N = 31975.75

PostMark

This is a test of NetApp's PostMark benchmark designed to simulate small-file testing similar to the tasks endured by web and mail servers. This test profile will set PostMark to perform 25,000 transactions with 500 files simultaneously with the file sizes ranging between 5 and 512 kilobytes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostMark 1.51Disk Transaction PerformanceZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #110002000300040005000SE +/- 31.33, N = 348701. (CC) gcc options: -O3

Parboil

The Parboil Benchmarks from the IMPACT Research Group at University of Illinois are a set of throughput computing applications for looking at computing architecture and compilers. Parboil test-cases support OpenMP, OpenCL, and CUDA multi-processing environments. However, at this time the test profile is just making use of the OpenMP and OpenCL test workloads. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterParboil 2.5Test: OpenMP CUTCPZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #10.8011.6022.4033.2044.005SE +/- 0.01, N = 33.561. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp

TTSIOD 3D Renderer

A portable GPL 3D software renderer that supports OpenMP and Intel Threading Building Blocks with many different rendering modes. This version does not use OpenGL but is entirely CPU/software based. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterTTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3bPhong Rendering With Soft-Shadow MappingZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #190180270360450SE +/- 2.43, N = 3402.201. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -mtune=native -flto -msse -mrecip -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -mssse3 -lSDL -lpthread -fopenmp -fwhole-program -lstdc++

SVT-HEVC

This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-HEVC CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the HEVC / H.265 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 2019-02-031080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video EncodeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v350100150200250SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 1.43, N = 3SE +/- 1.16, N = 3SE +/- 1.68, N = 3SE +/- 2.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.66, N = 3SE +/- 0.66, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3148.83149.00156.00193.00248.00120.00192.00156.001. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O2 -flto -fvisibility=hidden -march=native -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 2019-02-031080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video EncodeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v34080120160200Min: 148.4 / Avg: 148.83 / Max: 149.07Min: 145.91 / Avg: 148.76 / Max: 150.23Min: 153.41 / Avg: 155.74 / Max: 156.94Min: 189.33 / Avg: 192.69 / Max: 194.43Min: 243.61 / Avg: 247.63 / Max: 250.1Min: 119 / Avg: 120.25 / Max: 121.24Min: 191.02 / Avg: 192.33 / Max: 193.11Min: 155.56 / Avg: 156.01 / Max: 156.411. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O2 -flto -fvisibility=hidden -march=native -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt

SVT-VP9

This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-VP9 CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the VP9 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-VP9 2019-02-171080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video EncodeZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #11224364860SE +/- 0.06, N = 352.721. (CC) gcc options: -fPIE -fPIC -O2 -flto -fvisibility=hidden -mavx -pie -rdynamic -lpthread -lrt -lm

GraphicsMagick

This is a test of GraphicsMagick with its OpenMP implementation that performs various imaging tests to stress the system's CPU. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.30Operation: ResizingZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #150100150200250SE +/- 0.58, N = 32081. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -pthread -ltiff -lfreetype -ljpeg -lpng16 -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread

Swet

Swet is a synthetic CPU/RAM benchmark, includes multi-processor test cases. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgOperations Per Second, More Is BetterSwet 1.5.16AverageZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1140M280M420M560M700MSE +/- 2422102.64, N = 36420661161. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -lncurses -lrt

Timed LLVM Compilation

This test times how long it takes to build the LLVM compiler. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1Time To CompileZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3140280420560700333.98473.00412.00334.00244.00629.00370.00349.00

C-Ray

This is a test of C-Ray, a simple raytracer designed to test the floating-point CPU performance. This test is multi-threaded (16 threads per core), will shoot 8 rays per pixel for anti-aliasing, and will generate a 1600 x 1200 image. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterC-Ray 1.1Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per PixelZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #11530456075SE +/- 0.03, N = 365.371. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3

Parallel BZIP2 Compression

This test measures the time needed to compress a file (a .tar package of the Linux kernel source code) using BZIP2 compression. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterParallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12256MB File CompressionZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #10.83251.6652.49753.334.1625SE +/- 0.04, N = 33.701. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -pthread -lbz2 -lpthread

Primesieve

Primesieve generates prime numbers using a highly optimized sieve of Eratosthenes implementation. Primesieve benchmarks the CPU's L1/L2 cache performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPrimesieve 7.41e12 Prime Number GenerationZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #148121620SE +/- 0.02, N = 317.901. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -lpthread

Smallpt

Smallpt is a C++ global illumination renderer written in less than 100 lines of code. Global illumination is done via unbiased Monte Carlo path tracing and there is multi-threading support via the OpenMP library. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSmallpt 1.0Global Illumination Renderer; 128 SamplesZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #13691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 310.431. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -O3

Sysbench

This is a benchmark of Sysbench with CPU and memory sub-tests. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgEvents Per Second, More Is BetterSysbench 2018-07-28Test: MemoryZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1900K1800K2700K3600K4500KSE +/- 8789.90, N = 34056583.311. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -O3 -funroll-loops -ggdb3 -march=haswell -rdynamic -ldl -laio -lm

Unigine Heaven

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Heaven demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #11122334455SE +/- 0.37, N = 349.66

Unigine Sanctuary

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Sanctuary demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is very demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Sanctuary 2.3Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: FullscreenZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #150100150200250SE +/- 0.62, N = 3212.01

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Superposition demo for the Unigine engine, released in 2017. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #11632486480SE +/- 0.03, N = 370.27MAX: 93

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #161218243024MAX: 29.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Ultra - Renderer: OpenGLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1246810SE +/- 0.00, N = 37.80MAX: 8.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1816243240SE +/- 0.03, N = 332.93MAX: 42.7

Unigine Tropics

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Tropics / Islands demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is very demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Tropics 1.3Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: FullscreenZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #14080120160200SE +/- 0.02, N = 3168.43

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL 3 core profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #11326395265SE +/- 0.04, N = 358.04

Blender

Blender is an open-source 3D creation software project. This test is of Blender's Cycles benchmark with various sample files. GPU computing via OpenCL or CUDA is supported. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CUDAZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #180160240320400SE +/- 3.55, N = 3378.74

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: OpenCLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #180160240320400SE +/- 0.97, N = 3382.81

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-OnlyZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v370140210280350SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.52, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.60, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3149.24195.00212.00163.00114.00307.00172.00146.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-OnlyZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v360120180240300Min: 148.8 / Avg: 149.24 / Max: 149.54Min: 193.87 / Avg: 194.72 / Max: 195.66Min: 211.52 / Avg: 212.24 / Max: 213.03Min: 162.16 / Avg: 162.93 / Max: 164.1Min: 113.65 / Avg: 113.74 / Max: 113.82Min: 305.74 / Avg: 306.52 / Max: 307.28Min: 171.05 / Avg: 171.62 / Max: 171.95Min: 145.18 / Avg: 145.68 / Max: 146.16

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CUDAZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1100200300400500SE +/- 0.53, N = 3453.84

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CUDAZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000SE +/- 5.04, N = 31041.57

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CUDAZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000SE +/- 3.19, N = 3778.78

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Classroom - Compute: OpenCLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1100200300400500SE +/- 1.09, N = 3451.60

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: OpenCLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000SE +/- 6.70, N = 31008.60

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: OpenCLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1170340510680850SE +/- 4.16, N = 3772.95

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-OnlyZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #190180270360450SE +/- 0.44, N = 3408.75

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-OnlyZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #150100150200250SE +/- 0.10, N = 3229.87

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-OnlyZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v330060090012001500SE +/- 0.68, N = 3SE +/- 1.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 0.52, N = 3SE +/- 1.05, N = 3SE +/- 2.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.73, N = 3SE +/- 1.01, N = 3635.72775.00849.00655.00460.001283.00675.00610.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-OnlyZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v32004006008001000Min: 634.89 / Avg: 635.72 / Max: 637.06Min: 772.57 / Avg: 774.72 / Max: 776.72Min: 848.24 / Avg: 848.76 / Max: 849.53Min: 654.37 / Avg: 655.41 / Max: 655.98Min: 458.88 / Avg: 460.09 / Max: 462.19Min: 1280.19 / Avg: 1282.97 / Max: 1286.85Min: 673.63 / Avg: 675.06 / Max: 676.07Min: 609.22 / Avg: 610.42 / Max: 612.43

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CUDAZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000SE +/- 1.43, N = 31099.97

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: OpenCLZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #12004006008001000SE +/- 0.40, N = 31100.01

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-OnlyZ840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1110220330440550SE +/- 0.56, N = 3525.90

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K80160240320400SE +/- 3.65, N = 3SE +/- 1.96, N = 3SE +/- 4.61, N = 3SE +/- 2.47, N = 3SE +/- 3.56, N = 3SE +/- 10.89, N = 15342.96371.37368.77376.19279.04353.51
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70140210280350Min: 335.7 / Avg: 342.96 / Max: 347.19Min: 368.24 / Avg: 371.37 / Max: 374.97Min: 361.6 / Avg: 368.77 / Max: 377.37Min: 372.26 / Avg: 376.19 / Max: 380.74Min: 274.61 / Avg: 279.04 / Max: 286.09Min: 265.03 / Avg: 353.51 / Max: 426.42

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v380160240320400SE +/- 1.94, N = 3SE +/- 1.01, N = 3SE +/- 1.27, N = 3SE +/- 2.34, N = 3SE +/- 3.21, N = 3SE +/- 1.10, N = 3SE +/- 1.09, N = 3294369377373288354293MIN: 147 / MAX: 684MIN: 183 / MAX: 807MIN: 177 / MAX: 839MIN: 161 / MAX: 815MIN: 126 / MAX: 719MIN: 138 / MAX: 829MIN: 146 / MAX: 638
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v370140210280350Min: 290.97 / Avg: 294.21 / Max: 297.67Min: 366.92 / Avg: 368.93 / Max: 370.1Min: 374.6 / Avg: 377.14 / Max: 378.51Min: 368.81 / Avg: 373.33 / Max: 376.63Min: 283.93 / Avg: 288.28 / Max: 294.54Min: 352.74 / Avg: 353.85 / Max: 356.05Min: 290.32 / Avg: 292.5 / Max: 293.66

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v360120180240300SE +/- 0.92, N = 3SE +/- 0.46, N = 3SE +/- 0.83, N = 3SE +/- 1.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.86, N = 3SE +/- 0.89, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3234289293292240288225MIN: 40 / MAX: 621MIN: 52 / MAX: 647MIN: 52 / MAX: 652MIN: 53 / MAX: 654MIN: 49 / MAX: 632MIN: 50 / MAX: 654MIN: 35 / MAX: 473
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v350100150200250Min: 232.52 / Avg: 234.27 / Max: 235.65Min: 288.72 / Avg: 289.28 / Max: 290.2Min: 291.51 / Avg: 293.16 / Max: 294.08Min: 288.74 / Avg: 292.01 / Max: 294.2Min: 238.69 / Avg: 239.83 / Max: 241.52Min: 287.58 / Avg: 288.48 / Max: 290.25Min: 224.28 / Avg: 224.52 / Max: 224.89

SuperTuxKart

This is a test of SuperTuxKart, an open-source racing game. The engine, Antarctica, is a highly modified version of Irrlicht and uses OpenGL 3.1+. Bullet is used for physics. Sound is provided by OpenAL. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela CityAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v320406080100SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 1.94, N = 1572.9973.3873.6073.5473.7274.3845.95
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela CityAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31428425670Min: 72.93 / Avg: 72.99 / Max: 73.04Min: 73.18 / Avg: 73.38 / Max: 73.67Min: 73.28 / Avg: 73.6 / Max: 73.8Min: 73.12 / Avg: 73.54 / Max: 74.1Min: 73.6 / Avg: 73.72 / Max: 73.94Min: 73.86 / Avg: 74.38 / Max: 75.07Min: 34.2 / Avg: 45.95 / Max: 51.57

Darktable

Darktable is an open-source photography / workflow application this will use any system-installed Darktable program or on Windows will automatically download the pre-built binary from the project. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-onlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K48121620SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 4SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 312.4911.1011.4111.1713.1913.78
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-onlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K48121620Min: 12.46 / Avg: 12.49 / Max: 12.51Min: 11.07 / Avg: 11.1 / Max: 11.14Min: 11.36 / Avg: 11.41 / Max: 11.46Min: 11.16 / Avg: 11.17 / Max: 11.17Min: 13.18 / Avg: 13.19 / Max: 13.2Min: 13.77 / Avg: 13.78 / Max: 13.79

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-onlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K246810SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 36.236.095.344.547.665.39
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-onlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3691215Min: 6.2 / Avg: 6.23 / Max: 6.25Min: 6.06 / Avg: 6.09 / Max: 6.14Min: 5.31 / Avg: 5.34 / Max: 5.37Min: 4.5 / Avg: 4.54 / Max: 4.56Min: 7.65 / Avg: 7.66 / Max: 7.68Min: 5.38 / Avg: 5.39 / Max: 5.41

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-onlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K1.20382.40763.61144.81526.019SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 5SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 5SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 34.124.373.873.575.354.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-onlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K246810Min: 4.11 / Avg: 4.12 / Max: 4.13Min: 4.36 / Avg: 4.37 / Max: 4.37Min: 3.87 / Avg: 3.87 / Max: 3.87Min: 3.57 / Avg: 3.57 / Max: 3.57Min: 5.34 / Avg: 5.35 / Max: 5.37Min: 4.2 / Avg: 4.2 / Max: 4.21

GIMP

GIMP is an open-source image manipulaton program. This test profile will use the system-provided GIMP program otherwise on Windows relys upon a pre-packaged Windows binary from upstream GIMP.org. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Test: unsharp-maskAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K48121620SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 317.6415.2515.8117.1615.6215.02
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Test: unsharp-maskAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K48121620Min: 17.56 / Avg: 17.64 / Max: 17.79Min: 15.15 / Avg: 15.25 / Max: 15.37Min: 15.76 / Avg: 15.81 / Max: 15.85Min: 17.06 / Avg: 17.16 / Max: 17.29Min: 15.55 / Avg: 15.62 / Max: 15.76Min: 14.9 / Avg: 15.02 / Max: 15.26

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Test: resizeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K246810SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 38.667.827.527.498.246.77
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Test: resizeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3691215Min: 8.51 / Avg: 8.66 / Max: 8.77Min: 7.8 / Avg: 7.82 / Max: 7.84Min: 7.43 / Avg: 7.52 / Max: 7.62Min: 7.44 / Avg: 7.49 / Max: 7.53Min: 8.22 / Avg: 8.24 / Max: 8.26Min: 6.63 / Avg: 6.77 / Max: 6.84

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Test: rotateAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 13SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 313.2611.8811.8011.8013.1311.14
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Test: rotateAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K48121620Min: 13.24 / Avg: 13.26 / Max: 13.27Min: 11.73 / Avg: 11.88 / Max: 13.14Min: 11.78 / Avg: 11.8 / Max: 11.83Min: 11.73 / Avg: 11.8 / Max: 11.86Min: 13.11 / Avg: 13.13 / Max: 13.16Min: 11.12 / Avg: 11.14 / Max: 11.17

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Test: auto-levelsAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K48121620SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 315.3613.4313.6114.3414.0712.67
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Test: auto-levelsAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K48121620Min: 15.27 / Avg: 15.36 / Max: 15.41Min: 13.35 / Avg: 13.43 / Max: 13.58Min: 13.55 / Avg: 13.61 / Max: 13.68Min: 14.24 / Avg: 14.34 / Max: 14.45Min: 13.9 / Avg: 14.07 / Max: 14.17Min: 12.63 / Avg: 12.67 / Max: 12.71

Appleseed

Appleseed is an open-source production renderer focused on physically-based global illumination rendering engine primarily designed for animation and visual effects. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaScene: EmilyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2004006008001000422.69481.78378.97271.99774.80421.19

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaScene: Disney MaterialAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K90180270360450242.13309.83238.12168.73406.82245.34

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaScene: Material TesterAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K90180270360450225.60272.97213.66162.52421.10232.07

Coremark

This is a test of EEMBC CoreMark processor benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations/Sec, More Is BetterCoremark 1.0CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per SecondAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3110K220K330K440K550KSE +/- 2700.80, N = 3SE +/- 578.99, N = 3SE +/- 2122.46, N = 3SE +/- 5555.00, N = 3SE +/- 691.75, N = 3SE +/- 5211.05, N = 3SE +/- 4432.83, N = 32690632797393714305319331864843946813869491. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt
OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations/Sec, More Is BetterCoremark 1.0CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per SecondAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v390K180K270K360K450KMin: 263663.83 / Avg: 269062.8 / Max: 271908.46Min: 278721.37 / Avg: 279738.98 / Max: 280726.38Min: 367525.08 / Avg: 371429.54 / Max: 374824.3Min: 521569.05 / Avg: 531933.25 / Max: 540581.12Min: 185110.2 / Avg: 186483.53 / Max: 187315.25Min: 384492.15 / Avg: 394681.26 / Max: 401673.64Min: 379596.68 / Avg: 386948.53 / Max: 394915.461. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lrt" -lrt

Selenium

This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31632486480SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.44, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 359.7351.5750.9451.5051.7951.2170.111. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: firefox 68.0.12. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: firefox 68.0.13. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: firefox 68.0.14. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: firefox 68.0.15. Intel Core i5 9400F: firefox 68.0.26. Intel Core i9 9900K: firefox 68.0.27. 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: firefox 68.0.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31428425670Min: 59.46 / Avg: 59.73 / Max: 60.09Min: 51.46 / Avg: 51.57 / Max: 51.76Min: 50.66 / Avg: 50.94 / Max: 51.19Min: 50.98 / Avg: 51.5 / Max: 51.9Min: 51.65 / Avg: 51.79 / Max: 51.97Min: 50.5 / Avg: 51.21 / Max: 52.01Min: 69.57 / Avg: 70.11 / Max: 70.591. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: firefox 68.0.12. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: firefox 68.0.13. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: firefox 68.0.14. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: firefox 68.0.15. Intel Core i5 9400F: firefox 68.0.26. Intel Core i9 9900K: firefox 68.0.27. 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: firefox 68.0.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3612182430SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 323.2719.4619.2119.2519.9523.2925.081. chrome 76.0.3809.100
OpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3612182430Min: 23.16 / Avg: 23.27 / Max: 23.35Min: 19.4 / Avg: 19.46 / Max: 19.57Min: 19.16 / Avg: 19.21 / Max: 19.26Min: 19.19 / Avg: 19.25 / Max: 19.3Min: 19.91 / Avg: 19.95 / Max: 20.01Min: 23.14 / Avg: 23.29 / Max: 23.37Min: 24.96 / Avg: 25.08 / Max: 25.161. chrome 76.0.3809.100

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Octane - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v39K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 255.26, N = 3SE +/- 123.50, N = 3SE +/- 154.49, N = 3SE +/- 388.71, N = 3SE +/- 143.80, N = 3SE +/- 143.36, N = 3SE +/- 65.97, N = 3328743710836980378623503439786257421. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: firefox 68.0.12. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: firefox 68.0.13. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: firefox 68.0.14. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: firefox 68.0.15. Intel Core i5 9400F: firefox 68.0.26. Intel Core i9 9900K: firefox 68.0.27. 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: firefox 68.0.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Octane - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v37K14K21K28K35KMin: 32455 / Avg: 32873.67 / Max: 33336Min: 36881 / Avg: 37107.67 / Max: 37306Min: 36716 / Avg: 36979.67 / Max: 37251Min: 37343 / Avg: 37862.33 / Max: 38623Min: 34757 / Avg: 35033.67 / Max: 35240Min: 39527 / Avg: 39786 / Max: 40022Min: 25651 / Avg: 25741.67 / Max: 258701. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: firefox 68.0.12. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: firefox 68.0.13. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: firefox 68.0.14. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: firefox 68.0.15. Intel Core i5 9400F: firefox 68.0.26. Intel Core i9 9900K: firefox 68.0.27. 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: firefox 68.0.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Octane - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v311K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 99.65, N = 3SE +/- 219.19, N = 3SE +/- 58.30, N = 3SE +/- 213.82, N = 3SE +/- 111.06, N = 3SE +/- 39.48, N = 3SE +/- 66.06, N = 3426704922149499500934549445482346571. chrome 76.0.3809.100
OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Octane - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v39K18K27K36K45KMin: 42471 / Avg: 42670 / Max: 42779Min: 48885 / Avg: 49221.33 / Max: 49633Min: 49388 / Avg: 49499.33 / Max: 49585Min: 49693 / Avg: 50093 / Max: 50424Min: 45313 / Avg: 45494 / Max: 45696Min: 45426 / Avg: 45481.67 / Max: 45558Min: 34528 / Avg: 34656.67 / Max: 347471. chrome 76.0.3809.100

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v350100150200250SE +/- 0.46, N = 3SE +/- 0.70, N = 3SE +/- 0.74, N = 3SE +/- 0.43, N = 3SE +/- 0.37, N = 3SE +/- 0.65, N = 3SE +/- 0.78, N = 31972232252262052311541. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: firefox 68.0.12. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: firefox 68.0.13. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: firefox 68.0.14. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: firefox 68.0.15. Intel Core i5 9400F: firefox 68.0.26. Intel Core i9 9900K: firefox 68.0.27. 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: firefox 68.0.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v34080120160200Min: 196.37 / Avg: 197.27 / Max: 197.84Min: 221.61 / Avg: 223 / Max: 223.8Min: 224.29 / Avg: 225.14 / Max: 226.61Min: 225.71 / Avg: 226.48 / Max: 227.19Min: 204.97 / Avg: 205.48 / Max: 206.2Min: 229.92 / Avg: 231.14 / Max: 232.13Min: 153.18 / Avg: 154.25 / Max: 155.761. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: firefox 68.0.12. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: firefox 68.0.13. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: firefox 68.0.14. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: firefox 68.0.15. Intel Core i5 9400F: firefox 68.0.26. Intel Core i9 9900K: firefox 68.0.27. 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: firefox 68.0.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v350100150200250SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 1.68, N = 3SE +/- 1.13, N = 3SE +/- 2.46, N = 3SE +/- 1.99, N = 3SE +/- 1.70, N = 3SE +/- 0.43, N = 31952222242242142081691. chrome 76.0.3809.100
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v34080120160200Min: 194.3 / Avg: 194.53 / Max: 194.67Min: 219.83 / Avg: 222.04 / Max: 225.34Min: 221.78 / Avg: 223.96 / Max: 225.59Min: 220.94 / Avg: 224.19 / Max: 229.01Min: 209.85 / Avg: 213.82 / Max: 216.08Min: 204.65 / Avg: 207.78 / Max: 210.48Min: 168.72 / Avg: 169.46 / Max: 170.211. chrome 76.0.3809.100

libjpeg-turbo tjbench

tjbench is a JPEG decompression/compression benchmark part of libjpeg-turbo. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMegapixels/sec, More Is Betterlibjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2Test: Decompression ThroughputAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v350100150200250SE +/- 0.34, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.66, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.88, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 1.19, N = 3181219220227200240155-lm1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -rdynamic
OpenBenchmarking.orgMegapixels/sec, More Is Betterlibjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2Test: Decompression ThroughputAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v34080120160200Min: 180.57 / Avg: 181.01 / Max: 181.68Min: 217.98 / Avg: 218.61 / Max: 219.1Min: 219.09 / Avg: 220.41 / Max: 221.1Min: 226.11 / Avg: 226.84 / Max: 227.33Min: 198.57 / Avg: 200.32 / Max: 201.33Min: 239.92 / Avg: 240.07 / Max: 240.3Min: 152.44 / Avg: 154.81 / Max: 156.051. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -rdynamic

John The Ripper

This is a benchmark of John The Ripper, which is a password cracker. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1Test: BlowfishAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v36K12K18K24K30KSE +/- 23.46, N = 3SE +/- 5.51, N = 3SE +/- 19.85, N = 3SE +/- 50.00, N = 3SE +/- 2.00, N = 3SE +/- 30.46, N = 3SE +/- 34.86, N = 31791914599195952829197721667820060-lgmp-lgmp-lgmp-lgmp1. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -pthread -lm -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2
OpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1Test: BlowfishAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v35K10K15K20K25KMin: 17888 / Avg: 17919 / Max: 17965Min: 14589 / Avg: 14599 / Max: 14608Min: 19574 / Avg: 19595.33 / Max: 19635Min: 28207 / Avg: 28291 / Max: 28380Min: 9768 / Avg: 9772 / Max: 9774Min: 16636 / Avg: 16677.67 / Max: 16737Min: 19990 / Avg: 20059.67 / Max: 200971. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -fopenmp -pthread -lm -lz -ldl -lcrypt -lbz2

GROMACS

The Gromacs molecular dynamics package testing on the CPU with the water_GMX50 data. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Day, More Is BetterGROMACS 2018.3Water BenchmarkAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v30.28130.56260.84391.12521.4065SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 30.720.660.760.980.740.841.251. (CXX) g++ options: -march=core-avx2 -std=c++11 -O3 -funroll-all-loops -fopenmp -lrt -lpthread -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Day, More Is BetterGROMACS 2018.3Water BenchmarkAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3246810Min: 0.72 / Avg: 0.72 / Max: 0.73Min: 0.66 / Avg: 0.66 / Max: 0.67Min: 0.76 / Avg: 0.76 / Max: 0.76Min: 0.97 / Avg: 0.98 / Max: 0.98Min: 0.74 / Avg: 0.74 / Max: 0.75Min: 0.83 / Avg: 0.84 / Max: 0.84Min: 1.24 / Avg: 1.25 / Max: 1.271. (CXX) g++ options: -march=core-avx2 -std=c++11 -O3 -funroll-all-loops -fopenmp -lrt -lpthread -lm

CP2K Molecular Dynamics

CP2K is an open-source molecular dynamics software package focused on quantum chemistry and solid-state physics. This test profile currently makes use of the OpenMP implementation and using the Fayalite-FIST molecular dynamics run and measures the total time to complete. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterCP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1Fayalite-FIST DataAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v350010001500200025005303223183267806382512

SVT-AV1

This is a test of the Intel Open Visual Cloud Scalable Video Technology SVT-AV1 CPU-based multi-threaded video encoder for the AV1 video format with a sample 1080p YUV video file. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.51080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31020304050SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 325.9826.0935.4046.0422.4635.2131.341. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pie -lpthread -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.51080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3918273645Min: 25.85 / Avg: 25.98 / Max: 26.18Min: 26.01 / Avg: 26.09 / Max: 26.16Min: 35.33 / Avg: 35.4 / Max: 35.49Min: 45.77 / Avg: 46.04 / Max: 46.36Min: 22.4 / Avg: 22.46 / Max: 22.53Min: 35.09 / Avg: 35.21 / Max: 35.4Min: 30.94 / Avg: 31.34 / Max: 31.591. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -pie -lpthread -lm

VP9 libvpx Encoding

This is a standard video encoding performance test of Google's libvpx library and the vpxenc command for the VP9/WebM format using a sample 1080p video. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterVP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0vpxenc VP9 1080p Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v34080120160200SE +/- 1.90, N = 3SE +/- 2.95, N = 12SE +/- 1.53, N = 6SE +/- 1.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.48, N = 3SE +/- 0.93, N = 3SE +/- 1.01, N = 31351411361791281911751. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -fPIC -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -std=c++11
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterVP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0vpxenc VP9 1080p Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v34080120160200Min: 132.35 / Avg: 134.67 / Max: 138.43Min: 109.32 / Avg: 140.95 / Max: 147.43Min: 128.31 / Avg: 135.73 / Max: 138.23Min: 176.63 / Avg: 178.62 / Max: 180.27Min: 126.78 / Avg: 127.51 / Max: 128.42Min: 190.36 / Avg: 191.33 / Max: 193.19Min: 172.78 / Avg: 174.73 / Max: 176.181. (CXX) g++ options: -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -fPIC -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -std=c++11

dav1d

Dav1d is an open-source, speedy AV1 video decoder. This test profile times how long it takes to decode some sample AV1 video content. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterdav1d 0.3Video Input: Summer Nature 1080pAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3691215SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 311.7810.589.798.0412.687.681. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterdav1d 0.3Video Input: Summer Nature 1080pAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K48121620Min: 11.7 / Avg: 11.78 / Max: 11.89Min: 10.5 / Avg: 10.58 / Max: 10.69Min: 9.73 / Avg: 9.79 / Max: 9.89Min: 8.01 / Avg: 8.04 / Max: 8.11Min: 12.66 / Avg: 12.68 / Max: 12.71Min: 7.62 / Avg: 7.68 / Max: 7.751. (CC) gcc options: -pthread

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterdav1d 0.3Video Input: Summer Nature 4KAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K1020304050SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 334.2830.7126.0821.8742.6126.561. (CC) gcc options: -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Betterdav1d 0.3Video Input: Summer Nature 4KAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K918273645Min: 34.15 / Avg: 34.28 / Max: 34.5Min: 30.57 / Avg: 30.71 / Max: 30.92Min: 25.95 / Avg: 26.08 / Max: 26.28Min: 21.72 / Avg: 21.87 / Max: 22.08Min: 42.54 / Avg: 42.61 / Max: 42.69Min: 26.46 / Avg: 26.56 / Max: 26.721. (CC) gcc options: -pthread

Zstd Compression

This test measures the time needed to compress a sample file (an Ubuntu file-system image) using Zstd compression. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterZstd Compression 1.3.4Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3714212835SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 1528.9427.2522.3417.9628.7924.2017.08-llzma-llzma1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterZstd Compression 1.3.4Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3612182430Min: 28.39 / Avg: 28.94 / Max: 29.25Min: 27.22 / Avg: 27.25 / Max: 27.31Min: 22.23 / Avg: 22.34 / Max: 22.47Min: 17.84 / Avg: 17.96 / Max: 18.06Min: 28.77 / Avg: 28.79 / Max: 28.82Min: 24.13 / Avg: 24.2 / Max: 24.27Min: 15.7 / Avg: 17.08 / Max: 19.891. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -lz

XZ Compression

This test measures the time needed to compress a sample file (an Ubuntu file-system image) using XZ compression. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterXZ Compression 5.2.4Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31020304050SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 339.4238.8331.5125.4945.8528.4624.131. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -O2
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterXZ Compression 5.2.4Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3918273645Min: 39.29 / Avg: 39.42 / Max: 39.53Min: 38.81 / Avg: 38.83 / Max: 38.86Min: 31.43 / Avg: 31.51 / Max: 31.65Min: 25.34 / Avg: 25.49 / Max: 25.66Min: 45.56 / Avg: 45.85 / Max: 45.99Min: 28.43 / Avg: 28.46 / Max: 28.5Min: 24.09 / Avg: 24.13 / Max: 24.151. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -fvisibility=hidden -O2

PyBench

This test profile reports the total time of the different average timed test results from PyBench. PyBench reports average test times for different functions such as BuiltinFunctionCalls and NestedForLoops, with this total result providing a rough estimate as to Python's average performance on a given system. This test profile runs PyBench each time for 20 rounds. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2018-02-16Total For Average Test TimesAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v330060090012001500SE +/- 2.96, N = 3SE +/- 5.69, N = 3SE +/- 3.67, N = 3SE +/- 4.98, N = 3SE +/- 0.88, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 2.60, N = 311059599419199548011626
OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2018-02-16Total For Average Test TimesAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v330060090012001500Min: 1101 / Avg: 1105.33 / Max: 1111Min: 948 / Avg: 959 / Max: 967Min: 937 / Avg: 940.67 / Max: 948Min: 911 / Avg: 918.67 / Max: 928Min: 953 / Avg: 954.33 / Max: 956Min: 800 / Avg: 801 / Max: 802Min: 1621 / Avg: 1625.67 / Max: 1630

Go Benchmarks

Benchmark for monitoring real time performance of the Go implementation for HTTP, JSON and garbage testing per iteration. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: buildAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v34000M8000M12000M16000M20000MSE +/- 208994255.42, N = 3SE +/- 164685684.20, N = 3SE +/- 152619770.85, N = 3SE +/- 154588275.99, N = 3SE +/- 116621421.09, N = 3SE +/- 118424227.34, N = 7SE +/- 56467190.13, N = 316001189628135904392451375033899713786886343128258564521101544574719929462536
OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: buildAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v33000M6000M9000M12000M15000MMin: 15785393066 / Avg: 16001189627.67 / Max: 16419103520Min: 13384470541 / Avg: 13590439244.67 / Max: 13916014687Min: 13587373776 / Avg: 13750338997.33 / Max: 14055339249Min: 13616481123 / Avg: 13786886343 / Max: 14095503704Min: 12670503751 / Avg: 12825856452.33 / Max: 13054200720Min: 10850976687 / Avg: 11015445747 / Max: 11721246031Min: 19822348718 / Avg: 19929462536 / Max: 20014013044

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: httpAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v32K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 2.40, N = 3SE +/- 1.76, N = 3SE +/- 20.17, N = 3SE +/- 52.17, N = 3SE +/- 2.08, N = 3SE +/- 6.49, N = 35797656852164911791643536514
OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: httpAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v314002800420056007000Min: 5792 / Avg: 5796.67 / Max: 5800Min: 6565 / Avg: 6568.33 / Max: 6571Min: 4880 / Avg: 4911.33 / Max: 4949Min: 7814 / Avg: 7916 / Max: 7986Min: 4350 / Avg: 4353 / Max: 4357Min: 6502 / Avg: 6514.33 / Max: 6524

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: jsonAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v32M4M6M8M10MSE +/- 16902.96, N = 3SE +/- 15662.60, N = 3SE +/- 18947.61, N = 3SE +/- 8942.16, N = 3SE +/- 7995.80, N = 3SE +/- 8436.42, N = 3SE +/- 6165.43, N = 36529598758350758166574064232811401157381274447534
OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: jsonAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31.4M2.8M4.2M5.6M7MMin: 6495855 / Avg: 6529597.67 / Max: 6548259Min: 7552940 / Avg: 7583507 / Max: 7604723Min: 5787270 / Avg: 5816657 / Max: 5852071Min: 4054468 / Avg: 4064231.67 / Max: 4082090Min: 8098166 / Avg: 8114010.67 / Max: 8123806Min: 5721631 / Avg: 5738127 / Max: 5749446Min: 4435787 / Avg: 4447533.67 / Max: 4456655

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: garbageAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 1839.52, N = 3SE +/- 2347.95, N = 3SE +/- 2870.38, N = 3SE +/- 984.87, N = 3SE +/- 6125.38, N = 3SE +/- 617.39, N = 3SE +/- 4618.94, N = 3137698615639931173265859808205660711515641446990
OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: garbageAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3400K800K1200K1600K2000KMin: 1374098 / Avg: 1376986.33 / Max: 1380404Min: 1560024 / Avg: 1563993.33 / Max: 1568151Min: 1167537 / Avg: 1173264.67 / Max: 1176464Min: 858387 / Avg: 859808.33 / Max: 861700Min: 2044360 / Avg: 2056607.33 / Max: 2062982Min: 1150668 / Avg: 1151564.33 / Max: 1152748Min: 1438928 / Avg: 1446990.33 / Max: 1454927

Rust Mandelbrot

This test profile is of the combined time for the serial and parallel Mandelbrot sets written in Rustlang via willi-kappler/mandel-rust. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRust MandelbrotTime To Complete Serial/Parallel MandelbrotAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v320406080100SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 345.8244.7940.7036.1576.4244.0458.781. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -pie -nodefaultlibs -lutil -ldl -lrt -lpthread -lgcc_s -lc -lm
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRust MandelbrotTime To Complete Serial/Parallel MandelbrotAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31530456075Min: 45.68 / Avg: 45.82 / Max: 45.92Min: 44.66 / Avg: 44.79 / Max: 45.02Min: 40.68 / Avg: 40.7 / Max: 40.72Min: 35.74 / Avg: 36.15 / Max: 36.87Min: 75.65 / Avg: 76.42 / Max: 76.81Min: 44.01 / Avg: 44.04 / Max: 44.07Min: 58.71 / Avg: 58.78 / Max: 58.851. (CC) gcc options: -m64 -pie -nodefaultlibs -lutil -ldl -lrt -lpthread -lgcc_s -lc -lm

Tensorflow

This is a benchmark of the Tensorflow deep learning framework using the CIFAR10 data set. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTensorflow 2017-02-03Build: Cifar10AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K816243240SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 336.1227.5725.9321.8833.5423.86
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTensorflow 2017-02-03Build: Cifar10AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K816243240Min: 36.09 / Avg: 36.12 / Max: 36.16Min: 27.48 / Avg: 27.57 / Max: 27.62Min: 25.87 / Avg: 25.93 / Max: 25.97Min: 21.84 / Avg: 21.88 / Max: 21.92Min: 33.42 / Avg: 33.54 / Max: 33.6Min: 23.83 / Avg: 23.86 / Max: 23.89

Tungsten Renderer

Tungsten is a C++ physically based renderer that makes use of Intel's Embree ray tracing library. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Scene: HairAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31224364860SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 327.6632.5824.9117.5352.8328.0324.01-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=haswell -mno-sse4a -ljpeg1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Scene: HairAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31122334455Min: 27.62 / Avg: 27.66 / Max: 27.72Min: 32.55 / Avg: 32.58 / Max: 32.6Min: 24.86 / Avg: 24.91 / Max: 24.96Min: 17.51 / Avg: 17.53 / Max: 17.55Min: 52.8 / Avg: 52.83 / Max: 52.85Min: 27.91 / Avg: 28.03 / Max: 28.12Min: 23.98 / Avg: 24.01 / Max: 24.031. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Scene: Water CausticAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3918273645SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 330.8930.5826.7823.9839.3725.0530.47-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=haswell -mno-sse4a -ljpeg1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Scene: Water CausticAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3816243240Min: 30.79 / Avg: 30.89 / Max: 30.94Min: 30.36 / Avg: 30.58 / Max: 30.76Min: 26.49 / Avg: 26.78 / Max: 26.93Min: 23.95 / Avg: 23.98 / Max: 24.04Min: 39.25 / Avg: 39.37 / Max: 39.49Min: 24.98 / Avg: 25.05 / Max: 25.13Min: 30.13 / Avg: 30.47 / Max: 30.871. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Scene: Non-ExponentialAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v348121620SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 15SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 39.2611.688.306.8815.517.7114.63-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=haswell -mno-sse4a -ljpeg1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Scene: Non-ExponentialAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v348121620Min: 9.19 / Avg: 9.26 / Max: 9.3Min: 11.65 / Avg: 11.68 / Max: 11.7Min: 8.27 / Avg: 8.3 / Max: 8.31Min: 5.73 / Avg: 6.88 / Max: 7.07Min: 15.49 / Avg: 15.51 / Max: 15.53Min: 7.68 / Avg: 7.71 / Max: 7.73Min: 14.59 / Avg: 14.63 / Max: 14.721. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -ldl

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Scene: Volumetric CausticAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3510152025SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 311.7513.4910.267.5219.2410.0011.78-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=znver1 -msse4a-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=skylake -mno-sse4a -ljpeg-march=haswell -mno-sse4a -ljpeg1. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Scene: Volumetric CausticAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3510152025Min: 11.72 / Avg: 11.75 / Max: 11.77Min: 13.48 / Avg: 13.49 / Max: 13.51Min: 10.23 / Avg: 10.26 / Max: 10.28Min: 7.5 / Avg: 7.52 / Max: 7.53Min: 19.21 / Avg: 19.24 / Max: 19.28Min: 9.98 / Avg: 10 / Max: 10.06Min: 11.71 / Avg: 11.78 / Max: 11.831. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++0x -msse2 -msse3 -mssse3 -msse4.1 -msse4.2 -mfma -mbmi2 -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -mno-xop -mno-fma4 -mno-avx512f -mno-avx512vl -mno-avx512pf -mno-avx512er -mno-avx512cd -mno-avx512dq -mno-avx512bw -mno-avx512ifma -mno-avx512vbmi -fstrict-aliasing -O3 -rdynamic -lpthread -ldl

Tesseract

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 3840 x 2160AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.360.721.081.441.81.281.301.301.201.601.52

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70140210280350Min: 82.7 / Avg: 267.83 / Max: 320.6Min: 72.2 / Avg: 285.99 / Max: 347.2Min: 72.7 / Avg: 282.91 / Max: 345.6Min: 74.2 / Avg: 313.92 / Max: 390Min: 49.3 / Avg: 173.98 / Max: 265.2Min: 45 / Avg: 232.12 / Max: 363.4

Xonotic

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.5491.0981.6472.1962.7451.741.792.011.762.292.44

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70140210280350Min: 78.5 / Avg: 169.41 / Max: 225.1Min: 77.1 / Avg: 206.06 / Max: 379.2Min: 78.2 / Avg: 187.98 / Max: 312.1Min: 82 / Avg: 212.56 / Max: 308Min: 53.5 / Avg: 125.84 / Max: 258.3Min: 49.4 / Avg: 145.12 / Max: 229.5

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.40730.81461.22191.62922.03651.211.211.351.251.811.53

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70140210280350Min: 77.3 / Avg: 192.95 / Max: 346.6Min: 78.6 / Avg: 238.64 / Max: 370.3Min: 77.6 / Avg: 217.25 / Max: 401.6Min: 80.8 / Avg: 233.68 / Max: 392Min: 53.4 / Avg: 132.63 / Max: 216.6Min: 48.6 / Avg: 188.21 / Max: 313.5

SuperTuxKart

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela CityAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.05630.11260.16890.22520.28150.210.210.210.210.250.24

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70140210280350Min: 74.6 / Avg: 350.01 / Max: 402.8Min: 76.6 / Avg: 342.64 / Max: 391.8Min: 75.6 / Avg: 344.42 / Max: 394Min: 80.3 / Avg: 353.6 / Max: 411Min: 54 / Avg: 292.02 / Max: 341.7Min: 49.3 / Avg: 304.48 / Max: 352.5

Blender

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74.1 / Avg: 221.59 / Max: 229.7Min: 76.5 / Avg: 163.75 / Max: 170.9Min: 79.2 / Avg: 168.72 / Max: 177Min: 79.6 / Avg: 232.92 / Max: 247.7Min: 48.6 / Avg: 105.52 / Max: 109.7Min: 49.7 / Avg: 139.24 / Max: 148.5

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74 / Avg: 215.17 / Max: 221.6Min: 74.3 / Avg: 160.02 / Max: 162.8Min: 75 / Avg: 170.99 / Max: 175.6Min: 78.9 / Avg: 237.97 / Max: 245.4Min: 48.6 / Avg: 105.08 / Max: 106.6Min: 45.7 / Avg: 140.74 / Max: 150.2

Darktable

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 73.4 / Avg: 128.79 / Max: 150.4Min: 73.7 / Avg: 125.48 / Max: 151Min: 78.9 / Avg: 152.02 / Max: 191Min: 48.4 / Avg: 81.38 / Max: 102.6Min: 45.5 / Avg: 109.84 / Max: 149.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 9 3900X4080120160200Min: 72.1 / Avg: 106.08 / Max: 152.3Min: 76.9 / Avg: 125.28 / Max: 198.5

GIMP

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 72 / Avg: 117.96 / Max: 142.5Min: 72.9 / Avg: 103.78 / Max: 117Min: 74.1 / Avg: 114.8 / Max: 123.3Min: 76.9 / Avg: 128.83 / Max: 150.6Min: 48.1 / Avg: 66.8 / Max: 74.6Min: 44.3 / Avg: 83.9 / Max: 111.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20406080100Min: 71.8 / Avg: 94.9 / Max: 104.8Min: 74.6 / Avg: 94.53 / Max: 106.1Min: 76 / Avg: 106.93 / Max: 123.4Min: 47.5 / Avg: 58.49 / Max: 61.8Min: 45 / Avg: 65.06 / Max: 76.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 73.2 / Avg: 95.99 / Max: 112.5Min: 73.2 / Avg: 104.75 / Max: 119.7Min: 80.4 / Avg: 128.4 / Max: 143.1Min: 48.1 / Avg: 60.43 / Max: 71.7Min: 44.5 / Avg: 79.42 / Max: 109.2

Appleseed

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 72.8 / Avg: 218.01 / Max: 227.5Min: 73.3 / Avg: 162.23 / Max: 167.3Min: 74.6 / Avg: 168.52 / Max: 174.1Min: 75.6 / Avg: 232.25 / Max: 242.7Min: 48.1 / Avg: 101.5 / Max: 103.6Min: 45.5 / Avg: 140.89 / Max: 151.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 76.6 / Avg: 224.28 / Max: 232Min: 74.2 / Avg: 165.41 / Max: 169.1Min: 73.9 / Avg: 168.41 / Max: 170.7Min: 78.3 / Avg: 233.98 / Max: 241.9Min: 48.4 / Avg: 104.79 / Max: 105.6Min: 45.6 / Avg: 138.37 / Max: 140.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 75.4 / Avg: 224.46 / Max: 231.2Min: 74.4 / Avg: 161.25 / Max: 163.5Min: 74.5 / Avg: 169.02 / Max: 171Min: 79 / Avg: 233.03 / Max: 241.7Min: 48.6 / Avg: 100.19 / Max: 101.3Min: 45.6 / Avg: 138.65 / Max: 160.8

Timed LLVM Compilation

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTimed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74.8 / Avg: 192.91 / Max: 213.3Min: 74.1 / Avg: 156.2 / Max: 165.8Min: 75.8 / Avg: 167.66 / Max: 176.9Min: 79.9 / Avg: 215.93 / Max: 244.1Min: 48.7 / Avg: 101.14 / Max: 104.7Min: 45.4 / Avg: 142.27 / Max: 156.3

Timed Linux Kernel Compilation

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 76 / Avg: 195.51 / Max: 219.8Min: 76.3 / Avg: 153.45 / Max: 167.3Min: 74.7 / Avg: 158.55 / Max: 176.4Min: 78.7 / Avg: 199.09 / Max: 244Min: 48.7 / Avg: 97.01 / Max: 105.4Min: 45.3 / Avg: 127.66 / Max: 166.9

Coremark

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations/Sec Per Watt, More Is BetterCoremark 1.0CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per SecondAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70014002100280035001895.852150.982508.532847.102306.203386.01

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCoremark 1.0System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 76.6 / Avg: 141.92 / Max: 182.1Min: 73.6 / Avg: 130.05 / Max: 143.1Min: 74.2 / Avg: 148.07 / Max: 162.2Min: 76.8 / Avg: 186.83 / Max: 218.6Min: 49 / Avg: 80.86 / Max: 89.7Min: 45.2 / Avg: 116.56 / Max: 140.3

Selenium

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20406080100Min: 72.7 / Avg: 107.41 / Max: 126.7Min: 72.8 / Avg: 100.3 / Max: 109.7Min: 73.8 / Avg: 101.9 / Max: 112.5Min: 77.6 / Avg: 116.09 / Max: 123.6Min: 48.2 / Avg: 60.98 / Max: 67.9Min: 44.9 / Avg: 71.91 / Max: 82.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 73.5 / Avg: 103.47 / Max: 119.8Min: 73 / Avg: 97.54 / Max: 111.3Min: 72.6 / Avg: 99.48 / Max: 113.3Min: 77.1 / Avg: 112.89 / Max: 134Min: 48 / Avg: 60.95 / Max: 69.3Min: 43.1 / Avg: 66.72 / Max: 77.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean Per Watt, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Octane - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K130260390520650328.59383.73384.79334.27599.20613.10

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 73.2 / Avg: 100.05 / Max: 120.4Min: 72.5 / Avg: 96.7 / Max: 110.7Min: 73 / Avg: 96.1 / Max: 110.5Min: 77.1 / Avg: 113.27 / Max: 134.2Min: 48.2 / Avg: 58.47 / Max: 68.9Min: 43.7 / Avg: 64.89 / Max: 79.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean Per Watt, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Octane - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2004006008001000422.18507.02504.48452.48777.39680.15

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 73.4 / Avg: 101.07 / Max: 121.8Min: 72.8 / Avg: 97.08 / Max: 115.7Min: 73.7 / Avg: 98.12 / Max: 118.4Min: 76.9 / Avg: 110.71 / Max: 133.4Min: 48.2 / Avg: 58.52 / Max: 71.3Min: 44 / Avg: 66.87 / Max: 88.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.78531.57062.35593.14123.92651.902.262.261.993.493.46

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20406080100Min: 73.5 / Avg: 103.87 / Max: 122.8Min: 73 / Avg: 98.72 / Max: 111.3Min: 72.5 / Avg: 99.4 / Max: 110.3Min: 77.3 / Avg: 114.03 / Max: 127.9Min: 48.3 / Avg: 58.8 / Max: 71.3Min: 44 / Avg: 66.88 / Max: 81.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Watt, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.8011.6022.4033.2044.0051.782.212.211.943.563.04

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 72.7 / Avg: 109.58 / Max: 129.1Min: 73.2 / Avg: 100.67 / Max: 113.5Min: 72.5 / Avg: 101.18 / Max: 114.8Min: 76.1 / Avg: 115.67 / Max: 142.1Min: 48 / Avg: 60.09 / Max: 70.1Min: 43.9 / Avg: 68.32 / Max: 82.9

libjpeg-turbo tjbench

OpenBenchmarking.orgMegapixels/sec Per Watt, More Is Betterlibjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2Test: Decompression ThroughputAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.8821.7642.6463.5284.411.962.592.512.313.743.92

John The Ripper

OpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S Per Watt, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1Test: BlowfishAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K30609012015098.66108.41131.82140.94110.61125.73

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74.2 / Avg: 181.63 / Max: 207.4Min: 72.6 / Avg: 134.67 / Max: 146.1Min: 72.2 / Avg: 148.65 / Max: 165.2Min: 76 / Avg: 200.73 / Max: 224.5Min: 48.7 / Avg: 88.34 / Max: 93.4Min: 44.1 / Avg: 132.65 / Max: 156.7

GROMACS

OpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Day Per Watt, More Is BetterGROMACS 2018.3Water BenchmarkAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.00230.00460.00690.00920.01150.010.01

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGROMACS 2018.3System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74.2 / Avg: 200.04 / Max: 212.3Min: 74.4 / Avg: 150.04 / Max: 154.7Min: 73.9 / Avg: 154.88 / Max: 159.8Min: 75.8 / Avg: 198.82 / Max: 211.7Min: 48.6 / Avg: 108.12 / Max: 111.3Min: 45.1 / Avg: 143.9 / Max: 151.2

CP2K Molecular Dynamics

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 75.7 / Avg: 141.31 / Max: 148.3Min: 74.2 / Avg: 119 / Max: 126.8Min: 75.9 / Avg: 125.02 / Max: 131.6Min: 78.1 / Avg: 154.99 / Max: 162.6Min: 48.6 / Avg: 85.41 / Max: 88.9Min: 45.2 / Avg: 115.04 / Max: 120.4

SVT-AV1

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.51080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.07880.15760.23640.31520.3940.190.210.310.290.270.35

SVT-HEVC

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 2019-02-031080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.48150.9631.44451.9262.40751.241.581.732.141.651.86

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSVT-HEVC 2019-02-03System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 9 3900X4080120160200Min: 74.4 / Avg: 115.67 / Max: 233.8

VP9 libvpx Encoding

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterVP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0vpxenc VP9 1080p Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.3510.7021.0531.4041.7550.801.051.001.051.451.56

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterVP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 110.1 / Avg: 168.42 / Max: 200.9Min: 71.4 / Avg: 134.48 / Max: 158.7Min: 72 / Avg: 135.38 / Max: 158.5Min: 74.1 / Avg: 170.51 / Max: 204.2Min: 48.3 / Avg: 87.83 / Max: 103.4Min: 44.9 / Avg: 122.64 / Max: 164.8

x264

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Betterx264 2018-09-25H.264 Video EncodingAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.20930.41860.62790.83721.04650.450.660.670.880.710.93

x265

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Betterx265 3.0H.265 1080p Video EncodingAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.090.180.270.360.450.170.270.300.290.350.40

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Betterx265 3.0System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74.2 / Avg: 178.11 / Max: 211.3Min: 73.2 / Avg: 143.83 / Max: 159.7Min: 72.5 / Avg: 143.09 / Max: 167.6Min: 75.7 / Avg: 179.5 / Max: 217.8Min: 48.4 / Avg: 97.08 / Max: 111.4Min: 45.5 / Avg: 112.19 / Max: 146.1

dav1d

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Betterdav1d 0.3System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 73.5 / Avg: 182.82 / Max: 209.7Min: 73.6 / Avg: 141.02 / Max: 159.5Min: 74 / Avg: 157.37 / Max: 173.7Min: 76.4 / Avg: 184.45 / Max: 222.2Min: 48.2 / Avg: 94.11 / Max: 104Min: 45 / Avg: 127.84 / Max: 149.8

Zstd Compression

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterZstd Compression 1.3.4System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 74.8 / Avg: 139.19 / Max: 157.6Min: 73.9 / Avg: 115.86 / Max: 128.9Min: 74 / Avg: 123.48 / Max: 135.8Min: 77.2 / Avg: 149.73 / Max: 171.3Min: 48.5 / Avg: 82.29 / Max: 91.8Min: 45.1 / Avg: 113.07 / Max: 127.6

XZ Compression

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterXZ Compression 5.2.4System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 75.1 / Avg: 144.56 / Max: 174.5Min: 73.8 / Avg: 123.5 / Max: 142.3Min: 73.3 / Avg: 134.82 / Max: 153.6Min: 77.5 / Avg: 158.44 / Max: 184.4Min: 48.3 / Avg: 83.85 / Max: 94.9Min: 45 / Avg: 126.01 / Max: 176.4

Stockfish

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterStockfish 9Total TimeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K40K80K120K160K200K111706.02127374.61155686.49160646.26139652.94181677.15

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterStockfish 9System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 75.2 / Avg: 208.84 / Max: 220Min: 74.1 / Avg: 160.58 / Max: 164.8Min: 73.5 / Avg: 169.09 / Max: 174.2Min: 78.2 / Avg: 233.85 / Max: 243.7Min: 48.8 / Avg: 100.76 / Max: 104.6Min: 45.2 / Avg: 138.56 / Max: 153.5

asmFish

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes/second Per Watt, More Is BetterasmFish 2018-07-231024 Hash Memory, 26 DepthAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K40K80K120K160K200K117198.66139128.31165344.01166630.69152150.93198396.58

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterasmFish 2018-07-23System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 75.8 / Avg: 206.53 / Max: 213.1Min: 72.4 / Avg: 155 / Max: 159Min: 74.3 / Avg: 170.67 / Max: 174.8Min: 78.7 / Avg: 236.12 / Max: 243.6Min: 48.4 / Avg: 100.46 / Max: 102.6Min: 46 / Avg: 141.37 / Max: 145.7

PyBench

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2018-02-16System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20406080100Min: 71.7 / Avg: 96.86 / Max: 104.1Min: 72.7 / Avg: 97.21 / Max: 103.5Min: 79.2 / Avg: 116.39 / Max: 120.8Min: 48.2 / Avg: 58.01 / Max: 61.3Min: 44.5 / Avg: 69.75 / Max: 76.2

NAMD

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNAMD 2.13b1System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74.6 / Avg: 221.56 / Max: 232.8Min: 73.3 / Avg: 158.67 / Max: 163.8Min: 72.5 / Avg: 168.72 / Max: 173.7Min: 76.4 / Avg: 227.79 / Max: 242.1Min: 48.2 / Avg: 107.63 / Max: 110.2Min: 44.6 / Avg: 140.87 / Max: 165.6

Go Benchmarks

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20406080100Min: 75.8 / Avg: 98.97 / Max: 110.1Min: 71.6 / Avg: 91.42 / Max: 101.8Min: 73.7 / Avg: 95.77 / Max: 103.2Min: 75 / Avg: 104.44 / Max: 120.2Min: 48.5 / Avg: 57.88 / Max: 62Min: 44.4 / Avg: 65.52 / Max: 74.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 77.5 / Avg: 173.23 / Max: 212.8Min: 44.5 / Avg: 109.38 / Max: 143.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 72.6 / Avg: 134.9 / Max: 161Min: 72.1 / Avg: 134.54 / Max: 172Min: 78.2 / Avg: 167.36 / Max: 239.3Min: 48.6 / Avg: 77.77 / Max: 109.2Min: 45.5 / Avg: 120.11 / Max: 144.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 72.5 / Avg: 143.09 / Max: 173.6Min: 76.2 / Avg: 176.78 / Max: 237Min: 48.3 / Avg: 86.83 / Max: 105.3Min: 45.1 / Avg: 118.1 / Max: 166.2

Rust Mandelbrot

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterRust MandelbrotSystem Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 74.5 / Avg: 120.57 / Max: 176.2Min: 71.4 / Avg: 105.54 / Max: 128.9Min: 73 / Avg: 100.87 / Max: 143.1Min: 78.5 / Avg: 119.39 / Max: 186.5Min: 47.8 / Avg: 64.17 / Max: 80.1Min: 44.9 / Avg: 77.87 / Max: 134.8

Tensorflow

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTensorflow 2017-02-03System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 73.9 / Avg: 177.01 / Max: 202.6Min: 72.9 / Avg: 134.71 / Max: 154.7Min: 73.1 / Avg: 139.75 / Max: 165.3Min: 77.6 / Avg: 170.66 / Max: 208.4Min: 48.2 / Avg: 93.05 / Max: 106.4Min: 44.9 / Avg: 116.34 / Max: 157.1

Tungsten Renderer

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 75.2 / Avg: 182.87 / Max: 219.6Min: 73.8 / Avg: 145.59 / Max: 159.6Min: 71.6 / Avg: 149.83 / Max: 171.1Min: 78.1 / Avg: 204.41 / Max: 240.9Min: 48.4 / Avg: 93.43 / Max: 98.5Min: 45.2 / Avg: 125.66 / Max: 145.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 74.6 / Avg: 160.13 / Max: 202.8Min: 73.8 / Avg: 127.14 / Max: 153.9Min: 74.7 / Avg: 131.08 / Max: 159.6Min: 76.2 / Avg: 156.51 / Max: 196.7Min: 48.4 / Avg: 82.58 / Max: 97.9Min: 44.7 / Avg: 119.2 / Max: 157.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4080120160200Min: 73.5 / Avg: 117.81 / Max: 148.2Min: 76.3 / Avg: 155.73 / Max: 228.1Min: 48.4 / Avg: 80.01 / Max: 98.4Min: 44.9 / Avg: 91.91 / Max: 141.5

Meta Performance Per Watt

OpenBenchmarking.orgPerformance Per Watt, More Is BetterMeta Performance Per WattPerformance Per WattAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4008001200160020001593.401284.881433.661689.591695.161452.53

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsSystem Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70140210280350Min: 72 / Avg: 179.65 / Max: 402.8Min: 71.4 / Avg: 143.91 / Max: 394.9Min: 71.6 / Avg: 148.51 / Max: 401.6Min: 73.5 / Avg: 183.98 / Max: 411Min: 47.5 / Avg: 92.05 / Max: 111.4Min: 43.1 / Avg: 124.3 / Max: 363.4

GIMP

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XIntel Core i5 9400F20406080100Min: 72.4 / Avg: 97.04 / Max: 115.8Min: 73.8 / Avg: 97.95 / Max: 124.9Min: 48.2 / Avg: 66.55 / Max: 81

SVT-AV1

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.5System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 72.6 / Avg: 127.26 / Max: 162.4Min: 73.6 / Avg: 114.74 / Max: 169.3Min: 48.3 / Avg: 82.44 / Max: 105.9Min: 44.7 / Avg: 99.53 / Max: 147.5

dav1d

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Betterdav1d 0.3System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XIntel Core i5 9400F306090120150Min: 73.9 / Avg: 120.09 / Max: 146.8Min: 74.1 / Avg: 118.21 / Max: 151.2Min: 48.4 / Avg: 83.4 / Max: 97.3

Tungsten Renderer

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K306090120150Min: 72.1 / Avg: 128.13 / Max: 156.2Min: 73.5 / Avg: 144.36 / Max: 172.3Min: 48.3 / Avg: 87.41 / Max: 102.1Min: 45 / Avg: 105.36 / Max: 141.9

Darktable

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0System Power Consumption MonitorAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600X20406080100Min: 72.5 / Avg: 74.06 / Max: 75.8Min: 72.7 / Avg: 79.94 / Max: 104.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0System Power Consumption MonitorIntel Core i5 9400F20406080100Min: 48.6 / Avg: 67.87 / Max: 100.1

x264

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is Betterx264 2018-09-25System Power Consumption MonitorIntel Core i5 9400F20406080100Min: 48.6 / Avg: 81.91 / Max: 103.8

Tesseract

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.42080.84161.26241.68322.1041.351.491.120.751.870.721. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Xonotic

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.43430.86861.30291.73722.17151.161.481.150.751.930.721. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.36230.72461.08691.44921.81150.921.160.890.591.610.581. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

SuperTuxKart

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela CityAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.11030.22060.33090.44120.55150.290.290.220.150.490.151. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Blender

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Performance / Cost - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-OnlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20K40K60K80K100K49458.8852847.7653603.9756756.2645671.4884780.281. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.80Performance / Cost - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-OnlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70K140K210K280K350K196778.88211341.24215629.89229584.91191162.53333479.641. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Darktable

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Performance / Cost - Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-onlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K150030004500600075003172.462763.903753.895573.831965.316807.321. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Performance / Cost - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-onlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K60012001800240030001582.421516.411756.862265.461141.342662.661. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.0Performance / Cost - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-onlyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K4008001200160020001046.481088.131273.231781.43797.152074.801. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

GIMP

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Performance / Cost - Test: unsharp-maskAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2K4K6K8K10K4480.563797.255201.498562.842327.387419.881. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Performance / Cost - Test: resizeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K80016002400320040002199.641947.182474.083737.511227.763344.381. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Performance / Cost - Test: rotateAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K130026003900520065003368.042958.123882.205888.201956.375503.161. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.10.8Performance / Cost - Test: auto-levelsAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K150030004500600075003901.443344.074477.697155.662096.436258.981. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Appleseed

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaPerformance / Cost - Scene: EmilyAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K40K80K120K160K200K107363.26119963.22124681.13135723.01115445.20208067.861. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaPerformance / Cost - Scene: Disney MaterialAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K30K60K90K120K150K61501.0277147.6778341.4884196.2760616.18121197.961. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterAppleseed 2.0 BetaPerformance / Cost - Scene: Material TesterAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20K40K60K80K100K57302.4067969.5370294.1481097.4862743.90114642.581. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Timed LLVM Compilation

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterTimed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1Performance / Cost - Time To CompileAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K40K80K120K160K200K120218.20102588.00109741.24121551.4193791.03182962.781. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Timed Linux Kernel Compilation

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18Performance / Cost - Time To CompileAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K7K14K21K28K35K19326.8617937.9619134.6420893.1316713.3332594.121. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Coremark

OpenBenchmarking.orgIterations/Sec Per Dollar, More Is BetterCoremark 1.0Performance / Cost - CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per SecondAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K300600900120015001059.301123.451128.971066.001251.57798.951. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Selenium

OpenBenchmarking.orgms x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumPerformance / Cost - Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K6K12K18K24K30K15171.4212840.9316759.2625698.507716.7125297.741. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgms x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterSeleniumPerformance / Cost - Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2K4K6K8K10K5910.584845.546320.099605.752972.5511505.261. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean Per Dollar, More Is BetterSeleniumPerformance / Cost - Benchmark: Octane - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K50100150200250129.43149.03112.4075.88235.1380.541. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgGeometric Mean Per Dollar, More Is BetterSeleniumPerformance / Cost - Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70140210280350167.99197.67150.45100.39305.3392.071. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Dollar, More Is BetterSeleniumPerformance / Cost - Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: FirefoxAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.31050.6210.93151.2421.55250.780.900.680.451.380.471. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore Per Dollar, More Is BetterSeleniumPerformance / Cost - Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google ChromeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.3240.6480.9721.2961.620.770.890.680.451.440.421. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

libjpeg-turbo tjbench

OpenBenchmarking.orgMegapixels/sec Per Dollar, More Is Betterlibjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2Performance / Cost - Test: Decompression ThroughputAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.30150.6030.90451.2061.50750.710.880.670.451.340.491. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

John The Ripper

OpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S Per Dollar, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1Performance / Cost - Test: BlowfishAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K163248648070.5558.6359.5656.7065.5833.761. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

CP2K Molecular Dynamics

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterCP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1Performance / Cost - Fayalite-FIST DataAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K70K140K210K280K350K134703.8280068.44104733.86162539.27116267.68315191.761. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

SVT-AV1

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterSVT-AV1 0.5Performance / Cost - 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.03380.06760.10140.13520.1690.100.100.110.090.150.071. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

SVT-HEVC

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterSVT-HEVC 2019-02-03Performance / Cost - 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.18230.36460.54690.72920.91150.590.630.590.500.810.391. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

VP9 libvpx Encoding

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterVP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0Performance / Cost - vpxenc VP9 1080p Video EncodeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.19350.3870.58050.7740.96750.530.570.410.360.860.391. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

x264

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Betterx264 2018-09-25Performance / Cost - H.264 Video EncodingAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.08780.17560.26340.35120.4390.310.310.280.280.390.191. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

x265

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second Per Dollar, More Is Betterx265 3.0Performance / Cost - H.265 1080p Video EncodingAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K0.05180.10360.15540.20720.2590.120.160.130.100.230.091. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

dav1d

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is Betterdav1d 0.3Performance / Cost - Video Input: Summer Nature 1080pAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K90018002700360045002992.122634.423220.914011.961889.323793.921. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is Betterdav1d 0.3Performance / Cost - Video Input: Summer Nature 4KAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3K6K9K12K15K8707.127646.798580.3210913.136348.8913120.641. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Zstd Compression

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterZstd Compression 1.3.4Performance / Cost - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3K6K9K12K15K7350.766785.257349.868962.044289.7111954.801. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

XZ Compression

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterXZ Compression 5.2.4Performance / Cost - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3K6K9K12K15K10012.689668.6710366.7912719.516831.6514059.241. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Stockfish

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterStockfish 9Performance / Cost - Total TimeAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20K40K60K80K100K91846.6882141.8380016.7175284.8294439.1350957.131. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

asmFish

OpenBenchmarking.orgNodes/second Per Dollar, More Is BetterasmFish 2018-07-23Performance / Cost - 1024 Hash Memory, 26 DepthAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K20K40K60K80K100K95296.9786604.8085774.7578848.46102579.9156774.781. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

PyBench

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2018-02-16Performance / Cost - Total For Average Test TimesAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K100K200K300K400K500K280670.00238791.00309589.00458581.00142146.00395694.001. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

NAMD

OpenBenchmarking.orgdays/ns x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterNAMD 2.13b1Performance / Cost - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 AtomsAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K2004006008001000583.90673.47680.82725.03404.33867.351. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Go Benchmarks

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksPerformance / Cost - Test: buildAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K1500000M3000000M4500000M6000000M7500000M4064302165512.003384019372005.004523861530013.006879656285157.001911052611348.005441630199018.001. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksPerformance / Cost - Test: httpAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K500K1000K1500K2000K2500K1472438.001635432.001716064.002450589.001179484.002150382.001. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksPerformance / Cost - Test: jsonAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K600M1200M1800M2400M3000M1658517892.001888293243.001913680153.002028051768.001208987639.002834634738.001. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksPerformance / Cost - Test: garbageAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K120M240M360M480M600M349754444.00389434257.00386004185.00429044192.00306434443.00568872616.001. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Rust Mandelbrot

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterRust MandelbrotPerformance / Cost - Time To Complete Serial/Parallel MandelbrotAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K5K10K15K20K25K11638.2811152.7113390.3018038.8511386.5821755.761. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Tensorflow

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterTensorflow 2017-02-03Performance / Cost - Build: Cifar10AMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3K6K9K12K15K9174.486864.938530.9710918.124997.4611786.841. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Tungsten Renderer

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Performance / Cost - Scene: HairAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3K6K9K12K15K7025.648112.428195.398747.477871.6713846.821. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Performance / Cost - Scene: Water CausticAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K3K6K9K12K15K7846.067614.428810.6211966.025866.1312374.701. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Performance / Cost - Scene: Non-ExponentialAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K80016002400320040002352.042908.322730.703433.122310.993808.741. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds x Dollar, Fewer Is BetterTungsten Renderer 0.2.2Performance / Cost - Scene: Volumetric CausticAMD Ryzen 7 2700XAMD Ryzen 5 3600XAMD Ryzen 7 3700XAMD Ryzen 9 3900XIntel Core i5 9400FIntel Core i9 9900K110022003300440055002984.503359.013375.543752.482866.764940.001. AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: $254 reported cost.2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 reported cost.3. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 reported cost.4. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 reported cost.5. Intel Core i5 9400F: $149 reported cost.6. Intel Core i9 9900K: $494 reported cost.

Darktable

Darktable is an open-source photography / workflow application this will use any system-installed Darktable program or on Windows will automatically download the pre-built binary from the project. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.2Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3246810SE +/- 0.06, N = 38.04

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.2Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3246810SE +/- 0.06, N = 86.09

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterDarktable 2.6.2Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v30.86851.7372.60553.4744.3425SE +/- 0.06, N = 153.86

GIMP

GIMP is an open-source image manipulaton program. This test profile will use the system-provided GIMP program otherwise on Windows relys upon a pre-packaged Windows binary from upstream GIMP.org. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.8.22Test: unsharp-mask2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v31020304050SE +/- 0.06, N = 345.66

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.8.22Test: resize2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v33691215SE +/- 0.03, N = 39.62

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.8.22Test: rotate2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3612182430SE +/- 0.04, N = 323.38

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGIMP 2.8.22Test: auto-levels2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3510152025SE +/- 0.05, N = 322.80

246 Results Shown

Rodinia:
  OpenMP LavaMD
  OpenMP CFD Solver
NAMD
x264
x265
7-Zip Compression
Stockfish
asmFish
Timed GCC Compilation
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation
Radiance Benchmark:
  Serial
  SMP Parallel
OpenSSL
ctx_clock
Sysbench
SQLite
Flexible IO Tester:
  Rand Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 2MB - Default Test Directory
  Rand Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directory
  Rand Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directory
  Rand Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 2MB - Default Test Directory
  Rand Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directory
  Rand Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directory
  Seq Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 2MB - Default Test Directory
  Seq Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directory
  Seq Read - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directory
  Seq Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 2MB - Default Test Directory
  Seq Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directory
  Seq Write - Linux AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directory
FS-Mark:
  1000 Files, 1MB Size
  5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads
  4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size
  1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync
Dbench:
  12 Clients
  1 Clients
Compile Bench:
  Compile
  Initial Create
  Read Compiled Tree
PostMark
Parboil
TTSIOD 3D Renderer
SVT-HEVC
SVT-VP9
GraphicsMagick
Swet
Timed LLVM Compilation
C-Ray
Parallel BZIP2 Compression
Primesieve
Smallpt
Sysbench
Unigine Heaven
Unigine Sanctuary
Unigine Superposition:
  1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGL
  1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - High - OpenGL
  1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - Ultra - OpenGL
  1920 x 1200 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGL
Unigine Tropics
Unigine Valley
Blender:
  BMW27 - CUDA
  BMW27 - OpenCL
  BMW27 - CPU-Only
  Classroom - CUDA
  Fishy Cat - CUDA
  Barbershop - CUDA
  Classroom - OpenCL
  Fishy Cat - OpenCL
  Barbershop - OpenCL
  Classroom - CPU-Only
  Fishy Cat - CPU-Only
  Barbershop - CPU-Only
  Pabellon Barcelona - CUDA
  Pabellon Barcelona - OpenCL
  Pabellon Barcelona - CPU-Only
Tesseract
Xonotic:
  3840 x 2160 - Ultra
  3840 x 2160 - Ultimate
SuperTuxKart
Darktable:
  Boat - CPU-only
  Masskrug - CPU-only
  Server Room - CPU-only
GIMP:
  unsharp-mask
  resize
  rotate
  auto-levels
Appleseed:
  Emily
  Disney Material
  Material Tester
Coremark
Selenium:
  ARES-6 - Firefox
  ARES-6 - Google Chrome
  Octane - Firefox
  Octane - Google Chrome
  Jetstream - Firefox
  Jetstream - Google Chrome
libjpeg-turbo tjbench
John The Ripper
GROMACS
CP2K Molecular Dynamics
SVT-AV1
VP9 libvpx Encoding
dav1d:
  Summer Nature 1080p
  Summer Nature 4K
Zstd Compression
XZ Compression
PyBench
Go Benchmarks:
  build
  http
  json
  garbage
Rust Mandelbrot
Tensorflow
Tungsten Renderer:
  Hair
  Water Caustic
  Non-Exponential
  Volumetric Caustic
Tesseract:
  3840 x 2160
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  3840 x 2160 - Ultra
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  3840 x 2160 - Ultimate
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen - Ultimate - 6 - Candela City
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  Octane - Firefox
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  Octane - Google Chrome
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  Jetstream - Firefox
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  Jetstream - Google Chrome
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  Decompression Throughput
  Blowfish
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  Water Benchmark
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode
  1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  H.264 Video Encoding
  H.265 1080p Video Encoding
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  Total Time
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  Performance Per Watt
  Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  System Power Consumption Monitor
  Performance / Cost - 3840 x 2160
  Performance / Cost - 3840 x 2160 - Ultra
  Performance / Cost - 3840 x 2160 - Ultimate
  Performance / Cost - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen - Ultimate - 6 - Candela City
  Performance / Cost - BMW27 - CPU-Only
  Performance / Cost - Barbershop - CPU-Only
  Performance / Cost - Boat - CPU-only
  Performance / Cost - Masskrug - CPU-only
  Performance / Cost - Server Room - CPU-only
  Performance / Cost - unsharp-mask
  Performance / Cost - resize
  Performance / Cost - rotate
  Performance / Cost - auto-levels
  Performance / Cost - Emily
  Performance / Cost - Disney Material
  Performance / Cost - Material Tester
  Performance / Cost - Time To Compile
  Performance / Cost - Time To Compile
  Performance / Cost - CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second
  Performance / Cost - ARES-6 - Firefox
  Performance / Cost - ARES-6 - Google Chrome
  Performance / Cost - Octane - Firefox
  Performance / Cost - Octane - Google Chrome
  Performance / Cost - Jetstream - Firefox
  Performance / Cost - Jetstream - Google Chrome
  Performance / Cost - Decompression Throughput
  Performance / Cost - Blowfish
  Performance / Cost - Fayalite-FIST Data
  Performance / Cost - 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode
  Performance / Cost - 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode
  Performance / Cost - vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode
  Performance / Cost - H.264 Video Encoding
  Performance / Cost - H.265 1080p Video Encoding
  Performance / Cost - Summer Nature 1080p
  Performance / Cost - Summer Nature 4K
  Performance / Cost - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19
  Performance / Cost - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9
  Performance / Cost - Total Time
  Performance / Cost - 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth
  Performance / Cost - Total For Average Test Times
  Performance / Cost - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms
  Performance / Cost - build
  Performance / Cost - http
  Performance / Cost - json
  Performance / Cost - garbage
  Performance / Cost - Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot
  Performance / Cost - Cifar10
  Performance / Cost - Hair
  Performance / Cost - Water Caustic
  Performance / Cost - Non-Exponential
  Performance / Cost - Volumetric Caustic
Darktable:
  Boat - CPU-only
  Masskrug - CPU-only
  Server Room - CPU-only
GIMP:
  unsharp-mask
  resize
  rotate
  auto-levels